Misplaced Pages

Talk:Van Wickle Gates: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:11, 22 August 2021 editCzar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,314 edits Old AFD: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Van Wickle Gates closed as keep (XFDcloser)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:47, 27 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,269 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi |date=15 August 2021 |result='''keep''' |page=Van Wickle Gates}} {{Old AfD multi|date=15 August 2021 |result='''keep''' |page=Van Wickle Gates}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Higher education}}
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low |RI=y}}
}}


== Notability == == Notability ==

Latest revision as of 10:47, 27 February 2024

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconHigher education
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Misplaced Pages. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
WikiProject iconArchitecture
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Rhode Island Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island.

Notability

Not relevant for its own Wiki article, in my opinion. Merging into Brown under a 'traditions' section would probably be better. Jacotto (talk) 04:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Gallery

@Drmies and Beyond My Ken: There is no reason for the gallery to be any larger than the default size. If a larger size was necessary, the default would simply be larger. Filetime (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

The default size in a gallery is just that, the default size. It is not the ideal size, it's simply the size that the images will be displayed at if no other size is specified. The fact that we have the capability of specifying a different size is an indication that doing so is not disallowed. My philosophy is that images in Misplaced Pages articles should be presented at a sufficient size in order that they can be "read" by our users without requiring them to have to click through. Some will click through anyway because they want to see more detail but for most readers, a look at the gallery is sufficient if they can actually see the image which is extremely hard to do at the default size. For this reason, I believe that gallery images should be a large as is practicable, and not tiny, difficult to see images smaller than a postage stamp. There certainly is not policy or reccommendation in MOS which justifies your reverting my adjustments to the image size in the gallery- by doing so, you are only doing a disservice to our readers. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Categories: