Revision as of 23:28, 29 January 2007 editMetamagician3000 (talk | contribs)Administrators10,853 edits →Design: break uip a looooong sentence← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:48, 15 December 2024 edit undoHauntedSoil (talk | contribs)52 editsm →Design: Inserted possessive apostrophe where one had been missed.Tag: Visual edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|US Air Force strategic bomber (1949–1959)}} | |||
<!-- This article is a part of ]. Please see ] for recommended layout. -->{{Infobox Aircraft | |||
{{Infobox aircraft | |||
|name=Convair B-36 "Peacemaker" | |||
|name= B-36 "Peacemaker" | |||
|image= File:Convair B-36 Peacemaker.jpg | |||
|caption=The B-36D used both piston and jet engines. | |||
|caption=Beginning with the B-36D (B-36J shown), the Peacemaker used 6 radial piston engines and 4 jet engines. | |||
|type=] | |||
|type= ] | |||
|manufacturer=] | |||
|national_origin = United States | |||
|first flight=] | |||
|manufacturer= ] | |||
|introduced=] | |||
|designer= | |||
|retired=] | |||
|first_flight= 8 August 1946 | |||
|produced= | |||
|introduction= 1948 | |||
|number built=384 | |||
|retired= 12 February 1959 | |||
|primary user= ] | |||
|produced= 1946–1954 | |||
|unit cost=]4.1 million (B-36D)<ref name="knaack">{{cite book|author=Knaack, Marcelle Size|title=Post-World War II bombers, 1945-1973|publisher=Office of Air Force History|year=1988|id=ISBN 0-16-002260-6}}</ref> | |||
|number_built= 384 | |||
|variants with their own articles=] | |||
|primary_user= ] | |||
|variants= ]<br />] | |||
|developed_into= ]<br />] | |||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Convair B-36''' was a ] built by ] for the ], the first to have truly intercontinental range. Unofficially nicknamed the '''"Peacemaker"''', the B-36 was the first ] delivery vehicle, the largest piston aircraft ever to be mass-produced, and the largest warplane of any kind. Although there have been larger military aircraft, they have all been transports. | |||
The '''Convair B-36 "Peacemaker"'''{{refn|Convair proposed the name "Peacemaker" in a submission to a contest to name the bomber. Although the name "Peacemaker" was not officially adopted, it was commonly used and sources often state or imply the name is "official".<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070426130752/http://www.7bwb-36assn.org/peacemaker.html |date=26 April 2007 }} 7th Bomb Wing B-36 Association. Retrieved: 28 August 2010.</ref> |group=N}} is a ] built by ] and operated by the ] (USAF) from 1949 to 1959. The B-36 is the largest mass-produced ] aircraft ever built, although it was exceeded in span and weight by the one-off ]. It has the longest ] of any combat aircraft. The B-36 was capable of intercontinental flight without refueling. | |||
==History== | |||
The genesis of the B-36 can be traced to early 1941, prior to the entry of the US into ]. At the time it appeared that there was a very real chance that ] could fall, making a strategic bombing effort by the US against Germany impossible.{{fact}} A new class of bomber would be needed to fill this role, one that offered trans-Atlantic range so that it could bomb targets in Europe from bases inside the continental USA.{{fact}} The ] opened up a design competition for the ''very long-range bomber'' on ], 1941, asking for a 450 mph top speed, a 275 mph cruising speed, a service ceiling of 45,000 feet, and a maximum range of 12,000 miles at 25,000 feet.{{fact}} These proved too demanding for any short-term design, so on ], 1941 they were reduced to a maximum range of 10,000 miles, an effective combat radius of 4,000 miles with a 10,000 pound bombload, a cruising speed between 240 and 300 mph, and a service ceiling of 40,000 feet.{{fact}} | |||
Entering service in 1948, the B-36 was the primary ] vehicle of ] (SAC) until it was replaced by the jet-powered ] beginning in 1955. All but four aircraft have been scrapped. | |||
After the ] began in earnest with the 1948 ] and the 1949 atmospheric test of the first Soviet atomic bomb, American military planners sought bombers capable of delivering the very large and heavy first-generation nuclear bombs. The B-36 was the only American aircraft with the range and payload to carry such bombs from airfields on American soil to targets in the USSR, as storing nuclear weapons in foreign countries was (and remains) diplomatically delicate. The ] the B-36 afforded may have kept the Soviet Red Army from fighting alongside the North Korean and Chinese armies during the ].{{fact}} | |||
==Development== | |||
The B-36 was arguably obsolete from the outset, because it was piston-powered in a world of jet interceptors.{{fact}} But its jet rival, the ], which did not become fully operational until 1953, lacked sufficient range to attack the Soviet heartland from North American airbases and could not carry the huge first-generation ] (Neither could the other American piston bombers of the day, the ] and its later revision the ]).{{fact}} ]s (ICBMs) did not become effective deterrents until the ].{{fact}} Until the ] became operational in the late 1950s, the B-36, as the only truly intercontinental bomber, was the mainstay of the ] (SAC).{{fact}} | |||
] | |||
The design of the B-36 can be traced to early 1941, prior to the entry of the United States into ]. At the time, ] to the ], making strategic bombing attacks by the ] (USAAC) against Germany impossible with the aircraft available.<ref name="NMUSAF">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/197636/convair-b-36j-peacemaker/|title=Convair B-36J Peacemaker|publisher=National Museum of the United States Air Force|date=28 May 2015|access-date=15 January 2018}}.</ref> | |||
The United States would need a new bomber to reach ] and return to bases in North America,<ref name="taylor1969">{{cite book |last1=Taylor |first1=John W.R. |title=Combat Aircraft of the World from 1909 to the present |date=1969 |publisher=G.P. Putnam's Sons |location=New York |isbn=0-425-03633-2 |page=465}}</ref> necessitating a combat range of at least {{cvt|5700|mi}}, the length of a ]–] round trip. The USAAC therefore sought a bomber of truly intercontinental range.<ref name="johnsen1978">{{cite book |last1=Johnsen |first1=Frederick A. |title=Thundering Peacemaker: the B-36 Story in Words and Pictures |date=1978 |publisher=Bomber Books |location=Tacoma, Washington |page=1 }}</ref><ref name="jacobsenwagner1980">{{cite book |last1=Jacobsen |first1=Meyers K. |last2=Wagner |first2=Ray |title=B-36 in action |date=1980 |publisher=Squadron/Signal Publications |location=Carrollton, Tex. |isbn=0897471016 |page=4 |series=Aircraft in Action |volume=42 }}</ref> The German ]'s (RLM) would request the similar ultralong-range '']'' program on 12 May 1942. | |||
Convair touted the B-36 as an "aluminum overcast," a "long rifle" to give SAC a global reach.{{fact}} When General ] headed SAC (1949-57) and turned it into an effective nuclear delivery force, the B-36 formed the heart of his command. Its maximum payload was more than four times that of the B-29, even exceeding that of the B-52. The B-36 was slow and could not refuel in the air, but could fly missions to targets 3,400 miles (5,500 km) away and stay aloft as long as 50 hours.{{fact}} Moreover, the B-36 was believed to have an ace up its sleeve: a high cruising altitude, made possible by its huge wing area, that put it out of reach of all piston fighters and early jet interceptors.{{fact}} | |||
The USAAC sent out an initial request on 11 April 1941, asking for a {{cvt|450|mph}} top speed, a {{cvt|275|mph}} cruising speed, a service ceiling of {{cvt|45000|ft}} and a maximum range of {{cvt|12000|mi}} at {{cvt|25000|ft}}.<ref name="winchester2006">{{cite book |last1=Winchester |first1=Jim |title=Military aircraft of the Cold War |date=2006 |publisher=The Grange plc. |location=Rochester, Kent, UK |isbn=1-84013-929-3 |page=49 |section=Convair B-36 |series=The Aviation Factfile }}</ref> These requirements were too demanding and far exceeded the technology of the day,<ref name="johnsen1978" /> so on 19 August 1941, they were reduced, to a maximum range of {{cvt|10000|mi}}, an effective ] of {{cvt|4000|mi}} with a {{cvt|10000|lb}} bomb-load, a cruising speed between {{cvt|240|and|300|mph}}, and a service ceiling of {{cvt|40000|ft}}<ref name="taylor1969" /> The ceiling in both cases was chosen to exceed the maximum effective altitude of most of ]'s ] guns. | |||
Nevertheless, the B-36 was difficult to operate, prone in its early service years to catastrophic engine fires and other costly malfunctions. To its critics, these problems made it a "billion-dollar blunder".{{fact}} In particular, the ] saw it as a costly bungle that diverted funding and interest from their pet project, ]–based nuclear bombers. In 1947, the Navy attacked Congressional funding for the B-36, alleging that the aircraft failed to meet Pentagon requirements. The Navy believed that the dominance of the ] in the ] during ] proved that carrier-based air strikes would be decisive in future wars. To this end, the Navy designed ], a "]" capable of launching huge fleets of aircraft — or nuclear bombers. It then pushed to have funding transferred from the B-36 to the ''United States''. The Air Force successfully defended the B-36 project, and the ''United States'' was officially cancelled by ] ]. Several high-level Navy officials questioned the government's decision, alleging a conflict of interest because Johnson had once served on Convair's Board of Directors. The uproar following the cancellation of ''United States'' was nicknamed the "]".<ref name="revolt">Barlow, Jeffrey G. Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945–1950. Washington, D.C.: Naval Historical Center, 1994. ISBN 0-16-042094-6.</ref> The furor resulted in the immediately following ] of supercarriers, with very similar specifications. | |||
===World War II and after=== | |||
]]] | |||
In the Pacific, the USAAF needed a bomber capable of reaching ] from bases in ], and the development of the B-36 became a priority. Secretary of War ], in discussions with high-ranking officers of the USAAF, decided to waive normal army procurement procedures. On 23 July 1943, 15 months after the Germans' ''Amerikabomber'' proposals, and the same day that the German firm ] began design on ] of their own,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Griehl |first1=Manfred |last2=Dressel |first2=Joachim |title=Heinkel He 177 – 277 – 274 |year=1998 |publisher=Airlife Publishing |location=Shrewsbury, UK |isbn=1-85310-364-0 |page=197 }}</ref> the USAAF submitted a "letter of intent" to Convair for an initial production run of 100, even before testing of the two prototypes was complete.<ref name="knaack1988"/>{{rp|3−10}} The first delivery was due in August 1945, and the last in October 1946, but Consolidated (by now renamed Convair after merging with ]) delayed delivery. Three months after ] the aircraft was unveiled on 20 August 1945, and flew for the first time on 8 August 1946.<ref> ], 1946. Retrieved: 20 February 2012.</ref> | |||
After the start of the ] with the 1948 ], and the 1949 atmospheric test of the ], American military planners sought bombers capable of delivering the very large and heavy first-generation atomic bombs. | |||
The B-36 was the only American aircraft with the range and ] to carry such bombs from airfields on American soil to targets in the USSR. The modification to allow the use of larger atomic weapons on the B-36 was called the "Grand Slam Installation".<ref name="knaack1988"/>{{rp|24}} | |||
The B-36 was obsolete from the outset, while it now faced the widespread introduction of opposing jet fighters.<ref name="NMUSAF"/><ref name="wagner1968">{{cite book |last1=Wagner |first1=Ray |title=American Combat Planes |date=1968 |publisher=Doubleday & Company, Inc. |location=New York |isbn=0-385-04134-9 |page=142}}</ref> The ], its jet engined counterpart, did not become fully operational until 1953, and lacked the range to attack the Soviet Union from North America without aerial refueling and could not carry the huge ]. | |||
The other American piston bombers of the day, the ] and ], were also too limited in range.<ref name="yenne2004">{{cite book |last1=Yenne |first1=Bill |title=International Air Power Review |section=Convair B-36 Peacemaker |volume=13 |date=2004 |publisher=AIRtime Publishing, Inc. |location=Norwalk, CT |isbn=1-880588-84-6}}</ref>{{rp|124–126}} ]s did not become sufficiently reliable until the early 1960s. Until the ] became operational in 1955, the B-36 was the primary nuclear weapons delivery vehicle of the SAC.<ref name="NMUSAF"/> | |||
Convair touted the B-36 as the "aluminum overcast", a so-called "]", giving SAC truly global reach.<ref name="NMUSAF"/> During General ]'s tenure as head of SAC (1949–57), the B-36 formed the heart of the Strategic Air Command. Its maximum payload was more than four times that of the B-29 and exceeded that of the later B-52. | |||
The B-36 was slow and could not refuel in midair, but could fly missions to targets {{cvt|3400|mi}} away and stay aloft as long as 40 hours.<ref name="NMUSAF"/> Moreover, the B-36 was believed to have "an ace up its sleeve": a phenomenal cruising altitude for a piston-driven aircraft, made possible by its huge wing area and six engines, putting it out of range of most interceptors, as well as ground-based ]s.<ref name="NMUSAF"/> | |||
===Experimentals and prototypes=== | |||
] (later Convair) and ] took part in the competition, with Consolidated winning a tender on 16 October 1941. Consolidated asked for a $15 million contract with $800,000 for research and development, mockup, and tooling. Two experimental bombers were proposed, the first to be delivered in 30 months, and the second within 36 months. Originally designated Model B-35, the name was changed to B-36 to avoid confusion with the ] piston-engined flying-wing bomber,<ref name="johnsen1978" /><ref name="leach2008">{{cite book |last1=Leach |first1=Norman S. |title=Broken Arrow: America's First Lost Nuclear Weapon |date=2008 |publisher=Red Deer Press |location=Calgary |isbn=978-0889953482}}</ref>{{rp|26–28}} against which the B-36 was meant to compete for a production contract. | |||
Throughout its development, the B-36 program encountered delays. When the United States entered World War II, Consolidated was ordered to slow B-36 development to greatly increase ] production. The first mockup was inspected on 20 July 1942, following six months of refinements. A month after the inspection, the project was moved from San Diego, California, to Fort Worth, Texas, which set back development several months. Consolidated changed the tail from a twin-tail to a single, thereby saving {{cvt|3850|lb}}, but this change delayed delivery by a further 120 days. | |||
Changes in the USAAF requirements added back the weight saved in redesigns, and cost more time. A new antenna system needed to be designed to accommodate a new radio and radar system and the Pratt and Whitney engines were redesigned, adding another {{cvt|1000|lb}}.<ref name="leach2008" />{{rp|30}} | |||
==Design== | ==Design== | ||
] | ] | ||
In ], the fall of ] to a ] invasion seemed imminent. This would have left the ] (AAC) with no bases in Europe from which to bomb Germany. American bombers would have needed to reach ] from bases in North America. Doing so would require a combat range of at least 9200 km, the length of a ]–] round trip. Hence the AAC sought a bomber of truly intercontinental range.{{fact}} | |||
The B-36 was two-thirds longer than the previous "superbomber", the B-29 and its wingspan and height exceeded those of the Soviet Union's 1960s ], the largest ] aircraft ever produced.<ref name="NMUSAF"/> Only with the advent of the ] and the ], both designed two decades later, did aircraft capable of lifting a heavier payload enter service. | |||
On ] ], the AAC announced a design competition for an aircraft with a 275 mph (445 km/h) cruising speed, a service ceiling of 45,000 ft (14,000 m), capable of delivering 10,000 lb (4,500 kg) of bombs to targets 10,000 miles (16,000 km) away. These requirements far exceeded the technology of the day. The B-36 concept began with a proposal by ] (later ]) to meet this requirement; the same design request led to the ]. Though the need to bomb Germany from North American bases never arose, the project was not canceled because the B-36 was seen as playing a possible eventual role in the Pacific war.{{fact}} | |||
The wings of the B-36 were large even when compared with present-day aircraft, exceeding, for example, those of the C-5 Galaxy, and enabled the B-36 to carry enough fuel to fly the intended long missions without refueling. The maximum thickness of the wing, measured perpendicular to the ], was {{cvt|7.5|ft}}, containing a crawlspace that allowed access to the engines.<ref name="popsci1961">Griswold, Wesley P. ''Popular Science'', September 1961.</ref> The wing area permitted cruising altitudes well above the operating ceiling of any 1940s-era fighters, at over {{cvt|40000|ft}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/research/aircraft/bomber/index.asp |title=National Museum of the USAF – Bomber |access-date=12 November 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141108000856/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/research/aircraft/bomber/index.asp |archive-date=8 November 2014 }}</ref> In 1954, the ] and other nonessential equipment were stripped out (not unlike the earlier ] program for the atomic bomb-carrying "specialist" B-29s), resulting in a "featherweight" configuration that increased top speed to {{cvt|423|mph}},<ref name="jacobsen1974">{{cite magazine |page=54 |date=November 1974 |title=Peacemaker |magazine=Airpower |volume=4 |issue=6 |last1=Jacobsen |first1=Meyers K. }}</ref> and cruise at {{cvt|50000|ft}} and dash at over {{cvt|55000|ft}}, perhaps even higher.<ref name="yenne2004" />{{rp|136–137}} | |||
The B-36 took shape as an aircraft of immense proportions.<ref>see http://www.air-and-space.com/peacemkr.htm for a table comparing the large aircraft designed in the 1940s</ref> It was two-thirds longer than the previous superbomber, the ]. Its wingspan and tail height exceeded those of the ], the largest ever mass-produced propeller-driven aircraft. The wingspan of the B-36 exceeded even that of the ]. Only with the advent of the ] and the C-5, both designed two decades later, did aircraft larger than the B-36 and capable of lifting a heavier payload, become routine.{{fact}} | |||
The |
The large wing area, with the four jet engines supplementing the piston engines in later versions gave the B-36 a wide margin between ] (''V''<sub>S</sub>) and maximum speed (''V''<sub>max</sub>) at these altitudes. This made the B-36 more maneuverable at high altitude than most jet interceptors of the day, which could not maneuver effectively above {{cvt|40000|ft}}.<ref name="B361" /> However, the U.S. Navy ] fighter could intercept the B-36, thanks to its ability to operate at more than {{cvt|50000|ft}}.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061206065849/http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/hist-ac/f2h-2.pdf |date=6 December 2006 }} history.naval.mil. Retrieved: 28 August 2010.</ref> Later, the new Secretary of Defense, ], who considered the U.S. Navy and naval aviation essentially obsolete in favor of the USAF and SAC, forbade putting the Navy's claim to the test.<ref> ''Air Command and Staff College Air University''. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> | ||
The propulsion system of the B-36 |
The propulsion system of the B-36 was unique, with six 28-cylinder ] ]s mounted in an unusual ], rather than the conventional ] layout of other ]s. The prototype's six R-4360s delivered {{cvt|18000|hp}} which resulted in early B-36s needing long takeoff runs, which was ameliorated when power was boosted to {{cvt|22800|hp}}.<ref name="yenne2004" />{{rp|137–138}} Each engine drove a three-bladed propeller, {{cvt|19|ft}} in diameter, mounted in a pusher configuration. This unusual configuration prevented propeller turbulence from interfering with airflow over the wing, but led to engine overheating due to insufficient airflow around the engines, resulting in inflight ]. The large, slow-turning propellers interacted with the high-pressure airflow behind the wings to produce an easily recognizable very-low-frequency pulse at ground level that betrayed approaching flights. | ||
===Addition of jet propulsion=== | |||
Beginning with the B-36D, Convair suspended a pair of ] jet engines from each wing; these engines were also retrofitted to all extant B-36Bs. The jet pods greatly improved takeoff performance and dash speed over the target. In normal cruising flight, the jet engines were shut down to conserve fuel. | |||
Beginning with the B-36D, Convair added a pair of ]-19 ]s suspended near the end of each wing which were also retrofitted to surviving B-36Bs. Consequently, the B-36 was configured to have 10 engines, six radial propeller engines and four jet engines, leading to the B-36 slogan of "six turnin' and four burnin{{'"}}. The B-36 had more engines than any other mass-produced aircraft. The jet pods greatly improved takeoff performance and dash speed over the target. In normal cruising flight, the jet engines were shut down to conserve fuel. When the jet engines were shut down, louvers closed off the front of the pods to reduce drag.<ref> ''Popular Mechanics'', October 1950, p. 117.</ref> The two pods with four turbojets and the six piston engines combined gave the B-36 a total of {{cvt|40000|hp}} for short periods of time.<ref> ''Popular Mechanics'', July 1949, p. 124.</ref> | |||
].<ref>From the ] website ().</ref>]] | |||
Thus the B-36 came to have 10 engines, more than any other mass-produced aircraft. If all engines functioned normally at full power during the pre-takeoff warm up, the lead flight engineer would say to the captain "six turning and four burning". Erratic reliability led to the wisecrack "two turning, two burning, two joking, and two smoking," with two engines not accounted for.{{fact}} | |||
===Crew=== | |||
The B-36 required a standard crew of 15. As in the B-29, the pressurized flight deck and crew compartment were linked to the rear compartment by a pressurized tunnel through the bomb bay. In the B-36, one rode through the tunnel on a wheeled trolley, by pulling oneself on a rope. The rear compartment led to the rear gun turret, and featured six bunks and a galley for long missions.{{fact}} | |||
The B-36 had a crew of 15. As with the B-29 and B-50, the pressurized flight deck and crew compartment were linked to the rear compartment by a pressurized tunnel through the bomb bay. In the B-36, movement through the tunnel was on a wheeled trolley, pulling on a rope. The rear compartment featured six bunks and a dining galley and led to the tail turret.<ref name="shiel1996">{{Cite tech report |title=The B-36 Peacemaker: 'There Aren't Programs Like This Anymore' |url=http://cessnawarbirds.com/articles/PDF/peacemaker.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040621081814/http://cessnawarbirds.com/articles/PDF/peacemaker.pdf |archive-date=June 21, 2004 |url-status=dead |last1=Shiel |first1=Walter P. |year=1996 |page=7 }}</ref> | |||
===Landing gear=== | |||
The XB-36 featured single-wheel landing gear requiring the largest tires ever manufactured up to that time, 9 ft, 2 in (2.7 m) tall, 3 ft (1 m) thick, and weighing 1,320 lb (600 kg), with enough rubber for 60 automobile tires.<ref name="rubber">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2584|title=Convair XB-36 Peacemaker|accessdate=2006-09-04|work=National Museum of the United States Air Force}}</ref> These tires placed so much weight per unit area on runways that the XB-36 was restricted to the Fort Worth airfield where it was manufactured, and to a mere two USAF bases. At the suggestion of General ] the single-wheel landing gear was soon replaced by a more conventional four-wheel bogie.<ref name=four_wheel_bogie">An image of the four-wheel landing gear may be found .</ref> At one point a tanklike tracked landing gear<ref name="caterpillargear">{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2585|title=Convair XB-36 Landing Gear|accessdate=2006-09-04|work=National Museum of the United States Air Force}}<!-- note to editors: this is not the same link as the one a few sentences before, so please do not merge them --></ref> was also tried on the XB-36, but proved heavy and noisy and was quickly abandoned. | |||
{{multiple image|total_width=220|align=right|direction=vertical|image1=Convair XB-36 main landing gear detail 061128-F-1234S-028.jpg|image2=B-36 tracked gear edit.jpg|image3=Convair_RB-36H_Peacemaker_(28339777523).jpg|footer=The main landing gear evolved from a single-wheel design (top) to a 4-wheel bogie (bottom), but a tracked assembly (center) was also tested.|alt1=The single main tire of an XB-36 is about 1.5 times taller than the person standing beside it.|alt2=The experimental tracked landing gear unit of an XB-36, consisting of 2 flexible tracks supported by wheels, is pictured stopped in short grass with ruts trailing behind it.|alt3=The 4-wheel bogie of a retired RB-36H is pictured from the outboard side.}} | |||
The ] of the XB-36 featured a single-wheel main ] whose tires were the largest ever manufactured up to that time: {{cvt|9|ft|2|in}} tall, {{cvt|3|ft}} wide, and weighing {{cvt|1320|lb}}, with enough rubber for 60 automobile tires.<ref name="NMUSAF"/>{{Irrelevant citation|date=July 2018}} These tires placed so much ] on runways that the XB-36 was restricted to ] adjacent to the factory in Texas, ] in Florida, and ] in California.<ref name="jenkins2002">{{cite book |last1=Jenkins |first1=Dennis R. |title=Magnesium Overcast: The Story of the Convair B-36 |date=2002 |publisher=Specialty Press |location=North Branch, Minnesota |isbn=978-1-58007-129-1 }}</ref>{{rp|14–15}} The single-wheel gear was soon replaced by a four-wheeled ].<ref name="puryear1981">{{cite book |last1=Puryear |first1=Edgar F. |title=Stars in Flight |date=1981 |publisher=Presidio Press |location=Novato, CA |isbn=0-89141-128-3 |page=26}}</ref><ref name="johnsen1978" /><ref>{{cite book |last1=Schmidt |first1=Robert Kyle |title=The Design of Aircraft Landing Gear |date=18 February 2021 |publisher=SAE International |isbn=978-0-7680-9943-0 |pages=8–9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6Xh0EAAAQBAJ |language=en}}</ref><ref name="leach2008" />{{rp|29}} At one point, a tank-like tracked landing gear was also tried on the XB-36,<ref>{{cite magazine |date=August 1950 |title=It makes the B-36 light on its feet |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7zkvrEAD3_8C&pg=PA35|magazine=] |page=35}}</ref> but it proved heavy and noisy and was soon abandoned. | |||
===Weaponry=== | ===Weaponry=== | ||
{{more citations needed|section|date=August 2017}} | |||
The four bomb bays could carry up to 86,000 pounds of bombs, more than five times the load carried by the WWII workhorse, the ].{{fact}} The B-36 was not designed with nuclear weaponry in mind, because the mere existence of such weapons was top secret during most of the period when the B-36 was engineered (1941-46), and their mode of delivery had yet to be determined. Nevertheless, the B-36 stepped into a nuclear delivery role immediately upon becoming operational. In all respects but speed, the B-36 could match what was arguably its Soviet counterpart, the ] (still in service).{{fact}} Until the B-52 came on line, the B-36 was the only means of delivering the first generation Mark-17 hydrogen bomb,<ref>http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/mk17.htm</ref> 25 feet (7.5 m) long, 5 ft (1.5 m) in diameter, and weighing 42,000 lb (19,000 kg), the heaviest and bulkiest American nuclear weapon ever. Carrying this massive weapon required merging two adjacent bomb bays.{{fact}} | |||
The four ]s could carry up to {{cvt|87200|lb}} of bombs, more than 10 times the load carried by the World War II ].<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070107080528/http://www.boeing.com/history/boeing/b17.html |date=7 January 2007 }} ''boeing.com''. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> The B-36 was not designed with nuclear weapons in mind, because the existence of such weapons was top secret during the period when the B-36 was conceived and designed, and the initial B-36A was not capable of accommodating them.<ref>Peacock October 1990, p. 233</ref> Nevertheless, the B-36 stepped into its nuclear delivery role immediately upon becoming operational. In all respects except speed, the B-36 could match what was arguably its approximate Soviet counterpart, the later ].<ref> BBC News, 9 August 2007. Retrieved: 30 April 2010.</ref> Until the B-52 became operational, the B-36 was the only means of delivering the first generation ],<ref>{{cite book |last1=Tucker |first1=Spencer C. |title=Weapons and Warfare : From Ancient and Medieval Times to the 21st Century |date=26 March 2020 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing USA |isbn=978-1-4408-6728-6 |page=352 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VETPEAAAQBAJ |language=en}}</ref> {{cvt|25|ft}} long, {{cvt|5|ft}} in diameter, and weighing {{cvt|42000|lb}}, the heaviest and bulkiest American aerial nuclear bomb. The Mark 17 took up the aircraft's two aft bomb bays, while the forward bay could hold a Mark 6 atomic weapon.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Page |first1=Joseph |title=Ellsworth Air Force Base |date=2021 |publisher=Arcadia Publishing |isbn=978-1-4671-0694-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=17ksEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA29 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The defensive armament consisted of six |
The defensive armament consisted of six retractable gun turrets, with side-by-side turrets mounted in forward dorsal, aft dorsal and ventral positions, aft dorsal and non-retractable tail and nose turrets. Each turret was fitted with two {{cvt|20|mm|2}} ], for a total of 16, and all turrets were remote controlled.<ref>Peacock October 1990, p. 234</ref> ] vibration from gunnery practice often caused the aircraft's electrical wiring to jar loose or the ] electronics to malfunction, leading to failure of the aircraft controls and navigation equipment, which contributed to the crash of B-36B 44-92035 on 22 November 1950.<ref name="summaryaccidentreport44-92035">Lockett, Brian. Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> | ||
] {{cvt|20|mm|2}} cannon]] | |||
The Convair B-36 was the only plane designed to carry the ] Cloud Maker, a ] weighing 43,600 lb and designed to produce an ] effect. The T12 still remains the heaviest conventional bomb to have been employed by the United States.{{fact}} | |||
The Convair B-36 was the only aircraft capable of carrying the ], a ] weighing {{cvt|43600|lb}} and designed to produce an ] effect. Part of the testing process involved dropping two of them in a single flight, one from {{cvt|30000|ft}} and the second from {{cvt|40000|ft}}. | |||
==Production== | |||
] | |||
{| class=wikitable style="float:right" | |||
|- | |||
!Variant!!Built | |||
|- | |||
|XB-36||1 | |||
|- | |||
|YB-36||1 | |||
|- | |||
|B-36A||21 | |||
|- | |||
|B-36B||62 | |||
|- | |||
|B-36D||26 | |||
|- | |||
|RB-36D||24 | |||
|- | |||
|B-36F||36 | |||
|- | |||
|RB-36F||24 | |||
|- | |||
|B-36H||83 | |||
|- | |||
|RB-36H||73 | |||
|- | |||
|B-36J||33 | |||
|- style="border-top:1px solid #999;" | |||
|Total||384 | |||
|}{{fact}} | |||
The first prototype XB-36 flew on |
The first prototype XB-36 flew on 8 August 1946. The speed and range of the prototype failed to meet the standards set out by the USAAC in 1941. This was expected, as the Pratt & Whitney R-4360 engines required were not yet available.<ref name="knaack1988"/>{{rp|12−13}}<ref name="leach2008" />{{rp|32}} | ||
A second aircraft, the YB-36, flew on |
A second aircraft, the YB-36, flew on 4 December 1947. It had a redesigned, high-visibility, yet still heavily framed greenhouse dome-shaped canopy, which was later adopted for production, and the engines used on the YB-36 were more powerful and more efficient. Altogether, the YB-36 was much closer to the production aircraft. | ||
] | |||
The first of 21 B-36As were delivered in ]. They were admitted interim airframes, intended for crew training and later conversion. No defensive armament was fitted as none was ready. Once later models were available, all B-36As were converted to RB-36E reconnaissance models. The first B-36 variant meant for normal operation was the B-36B, delivered beginning in November 1948. This aircraft met all the 1941 requirements, but had serious problems with engine reliability, and with the availability of armaments and spare parts. Later models featured more powerful variants of the R-4360 engine, improved radar, and redesigned crew compartments.<ref>See http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum//research/bombers/bomber3.htm for more detail on the features and performance of each of 16 variants of the B-36</ref> | |||
The first 21 B-36As were delivered in 1948 as interim airframes intended for crew training. No defensive armament was fitted, since none was ready. All surviving B-36As were converted to RB-36E reconnaissance models once later models became available. Deliveries began in November 1948 of the combat-capable B-36B, which finally met the 1941 requirements, but had serious engine reliability and maintenance problems (changing the 336 spark plugs was a task dreaded by ground crews) and with the availability of weapons and spares. Later models had more powerful R-4360 engines, improved radar, and redesigned crew compartments. | |||
The four jet engines raised fuel consumption, thus reducing range. Meanwhile, new ]s made hand-aimed guns mounted in heavy turrets obsolete; they were also unreliable. In February of 1954, the USAF awarded Convair a contract to reduce the weight of the entire B-36 fleet by implementing a new "Featherweight" design in three configurations: | |||
* I removed the 6 movable gun turrets and other defensive hardware. | |||
* II removed the rear compartment crew comfort features, and all hardware accommodating the ] parasite fighter. | |||
* III incorporated both I and II. | |||
The six turrets eliminated by I reduced the crew from 15 to nine. III enabled a longer range and an operating ceiling of at least 47,000 feet (14,000 m), features especially valuable for reconnaissance missions. The B-36J-III configuration (the last 14 made) featured a single radar-aimed tail turret, extra fuel tanks in the outer wings, and landing gear allowing the maximum gross weight to rise to 410,000 pounds (190,000 kg). Production of the B-36 ceased in 1954.{{fact}} | |||
The jet engines increased fuel consumption and reduced range. Gun turrets were already recognized as obsolete, and newer bombers had only a tail turret, or no gunners at all for several years but the development of ]s, such as the Soviet ] which began test firings in 1951, eliminated remaining justifications for keeping them. | |||
==Reconnaissance capability== | |||
In February 1954, the USAF awarded Convair a contract for a new "Featherweight" program, which significantly reduced weight and crew size. The three configurations were: | |||
More than a third of all B-36 models were reconnaissance models, designated RB-36. Before the development of the ], the RB-36 was the mainstay of American photo reconnaissance over hostile territory. It was the only American aircraft having range enough to fly into Asia from bases in the USA, and size enough to carry the bulky high-resolution cameras of the day. The RB-36 performed a number of rarely acknowledged reconnaissance missions, and is suspected of having carried out numerous penetrations of ] (and possibly ]) airspace.{{fact}} | |||
* Featherweight I removed defensive hardware, including the six gun turrets. | |||
* Featherweight II removed the rear compartment crew comfort features, and all hardware accommodating the ] ]. | |||
* Featherweight III incorporated both configurations I and II. | |||
The six turrets eliminated by Featherweight I reduced the crew from 15 to 9. Featherweight III had a longer range and an operating ceiling of at least {{cvt|47000|ft}}, especially valuable for reconnaissance missions. The B-36J-III configuration (the last 14 made) had a single radar-aimed tail turret, extra fuel tanks in the outer wings, and landing gear allowing the maximum gross weight to be increased to {{cvt|410000|lb}}. | |||
Production of the B-36 ceased in 1954.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071014181534/http://www.cowtown.net/proweb/last_one.htm |date=14 October 2007 }} cowtown.net, 1 October 2006. Retrieved: 21 September 2007.</ref> | |||
The RB-36 was well-suited for such ] missions. Its high cruising altitude made it difficult to intercept, and its fuel capacity enabled missions up to 50 hours long. The RB-36 featured a pressurized camera compartment staffed by a crew of seven, in place of a forward bomb bay. The aft bomb bay contained tanks for extra fuel. The RB-36 cameras could produce very high resolution photographs: pictures of a golf course taken from 40,000 ft (12,000 m) show recognizable golf balls. RB-36s were distinguished by the bright aluminum of the camera compartment (contrasting with the dull magnesium of the rest of the fuselage), and by a series of ] under the aft fuselage, varying in number and placement.{{fact}} | |||
===Operating and financial problems=== | |||
Due to problems that occurred with the B-36 in its early stages of testing, development, and later in service, some critics referred to the aircraft as a "billion-dollar blunder".<ref name="wolk2003">{{cite book |last1=Wolk |first1=Herman S. |title=Fulcrum of Power: Essays on the United States Air Force and National Security |date=2003 |publisher=Diane Publishing |location=Darby, PA |isbn=1-4289-9008-9 |page=163}}</ref> In particular, the ] saw it as a costly bungle, diverting congressional funding and interest from ] and ]s in general, and carrier–based nuclear bombers in particular. In 1947, the Navy attacked congressional funding for the B-36, alleging it failed to meet Pentagon requirements. The Navy held to the pre-eminence of the aircraft carrier in the ] during World War II, presuming carrier-based aircraft would be decisive in future wars. To this end, the Navy designed {{USS|United States|CVA-58|6}}, a "]" capable of launching huge fleets of tactical aircraft or nuclear bombers. It then pushed to have funding transferred from the B-36 to USS ''United States''. The Air Force successfully defended the B-36 project, and ''United States'' was cancelled by ] ] in a cost-cutting move over the objections of both ] ] and the Navy's senior leadership. Sullivan resigned in protest and was replaced as Secretary of the Navy by ], who had limited familiarity with defense issues, but was a close friend of Johnson. Several high-level Navy officials questioned the government's decision in cancelling the ''United States'' to fund the B-36, alleging a conflict of interest because Johnson had once served on Convair's board of directors. The uproar following the cancellation of ''United States'' in 1949 was nicknamed the "]", during which time Matthews dismissed and forced into retirement the serving Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), Admiral ], following Denfeld's testimony before the ].<ref name="revolt">{{cite book |last1=Barlow |first1=Jeffrey G. |title=Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945–1950 |date=1994 |publisher=Naval Historical Center, Dept. of the Navy |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=0-16-042094-6}}</ref>{{rp|42}} | |||
The congressional and media furor over the firing of Admiral Denfeld, as well as the significant use of aircraft carriers in the ], resulted in the Truman administration subsequently ousting both Johnson and Matthews, and procuring {{Sclass|Forrestal|aircraft carrier|0}} supercarriers, which were similar in size to ''United States'', but geared towards multirole use with air wings of fighter, attack, reconnaissance, ], ] and ] aircraft. Simultaneously, heavy manned bombers for SAC were also deemed crucial to national defense and the two systems would never again be in competition for funding.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Articles/1981/1981%20mcfarland.pdf|last=McFarland|first=Keith|title=The 1949 Revolt of the Admirals|work=Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College Quarterly Vol. XI, No. 2|pages=53–63|year=1980|access-date=28 April 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126181734/http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Articles/1981/1981%20mcfarland.pdf|archive-date=26 January 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="revolt" /> | |||
==Operational history== | ==Operational history== | ||
] |
] | ||
The B-36, including its GRB-36, RB-36, and XC-99 variants, was in USAF service as part of the SAC from 1948 to 1959. The RB-36 variants of the B-36 were used for reconnaissance during the Cold War with the Soviet Union and the B-36 bomber variants conducted training and test operations and stood ground and airborne alert, but were never flown offensively as bombers against hostile forces.<ref>{{cite news |title=Costly Bomber Gives Way to Jet |url=https://www.newspapers.com/image/701186089 |access-date=28 January 2024 |work=Newspapers.com |publisher=Evening Vanguard |date=25 Feb 1957 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The B-36, including its RGB-36, RB-36, and XC-99 variants, was in service as part of the ] ] from 1948 through 1958. | |||
===Maintenance=== | |||
Unlike the B-52, which has seen action in the ] and the two ]s, no B-36 ever dropped a bomb or fired a shot at an enemy. The closest the B-36 came to seeing action was during the ] and the ], when nuclear-armed B-36s were dispatched to Turkey and Morocco.{{fact}} | |||
] | |||
The Wasp Major engines had a prodigious appetite for ] and each engine required a dedicated {{cvt|100|usgal|L}} tank.{{citation needed|date=April 2011}} Normal maintenance consisted of tedious measures, such as changing the 56 ]s on each of the six engines which were often fouled by the ] in the ] ] anti] fuel required. Thus, each service required changing 336 spark plugs. | |||
The B-36 was too large to fit in most ]s. Since even an aircraft with the range of the B-36 needed to be stationed as close to enemy targets as possible, this meant the plane was largely based in the extreme weather locations of the northern continental United States, Alaska, and the ]. Since the maintenance had to be performed outdoors, the crews were largely exposed to the elements, with temperatures of {{cvt|-60|°F|°C}} in winters and {{cvt|100|°F|°C}} in summers, depending on the location. Special shelters were built to provide the maintenance crews a modicum of protection. ]s were at risk of slipping and falling from icy wings. The ]s were thick enough, at {{cvt|7|ft}}, to enable a ] to access the backs of the engines and the landing gear during flight by crawling through the wings but was only possible at lower altitudes.<ref>Morris, Ted. zianet.com, 2000. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> | |||
In 1950, Consolidated-Vultee developed streamlined pods that looked like large drop tanks that mounted on each side of the fuselage to carry spare engines between bases. Each pod could airlift two engines. When the pods were empty, they were removed and carried in the bomb bays. No record exists of the pods being used.<ref> ''Popular Mechanics'', September 1950, p. 146,</ref> | |||
Though the B-36 had a better than average overall safety record, ten crashed between 1949 and 1954 (three 36Bs, three 36Ds, and four 36H's). Goleta Air and Space Museum maintains a web site with photographs and lengthy excerpts from the official crash reports.<ref>http://www.air-and-space.com/b-36%20wrecks.htm</ref> | |||
===Engine fires=== | |||
A B-36 was also involved in two "]" incidents. On February 13, 1950, a B-36, serial number ], crashed in an unpopulated region of ], resulting in the first loss of an American ]. On May 22, 1957, a B-36 accidentally dropped a Mark-17 ] on a deserted area while landing at Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque NM. Only the conventional trigger detonated, the bomb being unarmed. These incidents were classified for decades. See ].<ref>http://www.hkhinc.com/newmexico/albuquerque/doomsday/</ref><ref>http://www.air-and-space.com/b-36%20wrecks.htm</ref> | |||
] | |||
As engine fires occurred with the B-36's radial engines, some crews humorously changed the ] from "six turning, four burning" into "two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking and two more unaccounted for".<ref name="turn&burn">Daciek, Michael R. .{{unreliable source?|date=May 2015}} YourHub.com, 13 December 2006. Retrieved: 6 April 2009.</ref>{{refn|Quote attributed to Captain Banda when he was escorting Air Cadet Michael R. Daciek, later Lieutenant Colonel Daciek, on an inside tour of the XC-99 in 1953.|group=N}} This problem was exacerbated by the propellers' pusher configuration, which increased ]. The design of the R-4360 engine tacitly assumed that it would be mounted in the conventional tractor configuration with the air flowing in the order of propeller/air intake/cylinders and to the carburetor. In this configuration, the carburetor is bathed in warm air flowing past the engine, so is unlikely to ice up. However, they were mounted backwards in the B-36 and the carburetor was in front of the engine, where it would not benefit from engine heat and made more existing ] systems unsuitable.{{Why|date=June 2018}} Hence, when intake air was cold and humid, ice gradually obstructed the carburetor intake, which increased the ] richness until unburned fuel in the ] caught fire.<ref>Ricketts, Bruce. : Interview with ] Co-pilot 1st Lt R. P. Whitfield. mysteriesofcanada.com, 1998. Retrieved: 24 September 2007.</ref> Three engine fires of this nature led to the first loss of an American ] when a B-36 ] in February 1950. | |||
===Maintenance=== | |||
] | |||
The B-36 needed a great deal of maintenance between flights; although in an emergency an aircraft could be "turned" in a few hours for a ferry flight, it took much longer to get the airplane ready for an operational mission.<ref name="maintenance">{{cite web|url=http://forums.delphiforums.com/B36forum/messages/?msg=308.1|title=B-36 maintenance discussion|publisher=Delphi Forums}}</ref> In January 1951, a B-36 amassed 200 hours of flight time (8.3 standard 24-hour missions), an apparent record.{{fact}} | |||
===Crew experience=== | |||
The B-36 was too large to fit in most hangars. Moreover, even an aircraft with the range of the B-36 needed to be stationed as close to the enemy as possible, and this meant the northern USA, Alaska, and the Arctic. As a result, most "normal" maintenance, such as changing the 56 spark plugs (always at risk of fouling by the leaded fuel of the day) on each of its six engines, or replacing the dozens of bomb bay light bulbs shattered after a gunnery mission, was performed out of doors, in 100-degree summers and 60-below winters. Special shelters were built so that the maintenance crews could enjoy a modicum of protection while working on the engines. Often, ground crews risked slipping and falling from ice-covered wings, or being blown off by a propeller running in reverse pitch. Some procedures even required a mechanic to sit astride a running engine, a 19-foot diameter propeller at his feet, his hand near the 34-inch diameter cooling fan.{{fact}} | |||
] | |||
Training missions were typically in two parts, a 40-hour flight—followed by time on the ground for refueling and maintenance—and then a 24-hour second flight. With a sufficiently light load, the B-36 could fly at least {{cvt|10000|mi}} nonstop, and the highest cruising speed of any version, the B-36J-III, was at {{cvt|230|mph}}. Engaging the jet engines could raise the cruising speed to over {{cvt|400|mph}}. Hence, a 40-hour mission, with the jets used only for takeoff and climbing, flew about {{cvt|9200|mi}}. | |||
Due to its size, the B-36 was never sprightly or agile. Lieutenant General James Edmundson likened it to "sitting on your front porch and flying your house around".<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110131172413/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/filmmore/reference/interview/edmund10.html |date=31 January 2011 }}. ''American Experience'', PBS, January 1999. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> Crew compartments were nonetheless cramped, especially when occupied for 24 hours by a crew of 15. | |||
The wing roots were thick enough, 7 ft (2.1 m), to enable a flight engineer to access the engines and landing gear by crawling through the wings. This was possible only at altitudes not requiring pressurization.{{fact}} | |||
War missions would have been one-way, taking off from ]s in ] or ], overflying the USSR, and landing in Europe, Morocco, or the Middle East. Veteran crews recall feeling confident in their ability to fly the missions, but not to survive weapon delivery, as the aircraft were not fast enough to escape the blast.<ref>. delphiforums.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> These concerns were confirmed by the 1954 ] tests, in which B-36s were flown at combat distances from detonations of bombs in the 15-megaton range. At distances typical of wartime delivery, aircraft suffered extensive flash and blast damage.<ref>. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080227063837/http://worf.eh.doe.gov/data/ihp1d/11658e.pdf |date=27 February 2008 }}. worf.eh.doe.gov, 1 February 1980. Retrieved: 23 September 2007.</ref>{{Failed verification|date=August 2022|reason=Source describes Operation Castle B-36 damage by blast, thermal, and gust-loading effects: blast damage reported as minor, thermal energy predictions shown as conservative, and the sole gust-loading concern related to its horizontal stabilizer response.}} | |||
The Wasp Major engines also had a prodigious appetite for lubricating oil, each engine requiring a 100 gallon (380 L) tank. A former ground crewman has written: " an oil change interval as I think the oil consumption factor handled that." It was not unusual for a mission to end because one or more engines ran out of oil. Though the B-36 could continue flying with as many as three inoperative engines, the extra stress on the remaining engines put them at risk of failing.{{fact}} | |||
=== |
===Experiments=== | ||
] nuclear reactor testbed]] | |||
Like all large aircraft powered by piston engines, the B-36 was prone to engine fires, a problem exacerbated by the pusher configuration. When a crash occurred for any reason, the ]-rich airframe burned readily.{{fact}} | |||
] | |||
The B-36 was employed in a variety of aeronautical experiments throughout its service life. Its immense size, range, and payload capacity lent itself to use in research and development programs. These included nuclear propulsion studies, and "parasite" programs in which the B-36 carried smaller interceptors or reconnaissance aircraft.<ref name="millercripliver1978">{{cite magazine|title=B-36: The Ponderous Peacemaker|magazine=Aviation Quarterly |volume=4 |issue=4 |year=1978 |last1=Miller |first1=Jay |last2=Cripliver |first2=Roger |pages=366, 369 }}</ref> | |||
In May 1946, the Air Force began the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft project, which was followed in May 1951 by the ] (ANP) program. The ANP program used modified B-36s to study shielding requirements for an airborne reactor to determine whether a ] was feasible.<ref name="auto1">{{Cite web|url=https://enseccoe.org/data/public/uploads/2021/10/d1_the-future-role-of-nuclear-propulsion-in-the-military.pdf|title=The Future Role of Nuclear Propulsion in the Military|last=Trakimavičius|first=Lukas|website=NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence|language=en|access-date=2021-10-15|archive-date=18 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211018194534/https://enseccoe.org/data/public/uploads/2021/10/d1_the-future-role-of-nuclear-propulsion-in-the-military.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> Convair modified two B-36s under the MX-1589 project. The Nuclear Test Aircraft was a B-36H-20-CF (serial number 51-5712) that had been damaged in a tornado at Carswell AFB on 1 September 1952. This aircraft, redesignated the XB-36H (and later ]), was modified to carry a {{nowrap|1 MW}}, air-cooled ] in the aft bomb bay, with a four-ton ] installed in the middle of the aircraft between the reactor and the cockpit. A number of large air intake and exhaust holes were installed in the sides and bottom of the aircraft's rear fuselage to cool the reactor in flight. On the ground, a crane would be used to remove the {{cvt|35000|lb}} reactor from the aircraft. To protect the crew, the highly modified cockpit was encased in lead and rubber, with a {{cvt|1|ft|cm|adj=mid|4=-thick}} ] ]. The reactor was operational, but did not power the aircraft as its purpose was to investigate the effect of radiation. Between 1955 and 1957, the NB-36H completed 47 test flights and 215 hours of flight time, during 89 of which the reactor was critical.{{citation needed|date=June 2015}} | |||
When thinking about these engine fires, keep in mind that: | |||
*The ambient temperatures typical of the B-36's cruising altitude and of the high latitude bases where it was often stationed, were usually far below freezing. | |||
*Radial aircraft engines like the R-4360 are air-cooled. Hence the large volume of air flowing past the cylinders during flight underwent substantial warming.{{fact}} | |||
Other experiments involved providing the B-36 with its own fighter defense in the form of ] carried partially or wholly in a bomb bay. One parasite aircraft was the diminutive football-shaped ], which docked using a trapeze. The concept was tested using a B-29 carrier, but docking was difficult even for experienced test pilots. Moreover, the XF-85 was no match for contemporary foreign powers' interceptors in development or in service and consequently the project was cancelled.{{Citation needed|date=September 2022}} | |||
The design of the R-4360 engine tacitly assumed that it would be mounted in the following conventional ]: | |||
The ] was more successful and involving a modified B-36 (a GRB-36D "mothership") and the ], a fighter modified for ], in a bomb bay. The GRB-36D would ferry the RF-84K to the vicinity of the objective, whereupon the RF-84K would disconnect and begin its mission. Ten GRB-36Ds and 25 RF-84Ks were built and had limited service in 1955–1956.{{citation needed|date=June 2015}} | |||
propeller -- air intake -- 28 cylinders -- carburetor | |||
Projects ] and Tom-Tom involved docking ] to the wingtips of B-29s and B-36s. The hope was that the increased ] of the combined aircraft would result in a greater range. Project Tip Tow was cancelled when an EF-84D and a specially modified test EB-29A crashed, killing everyone on both aircraft. This accident was attributed to the EF-84D flipping over onto the wing of the EB-29A. Project Tom-Tom, involving RF-84Fs and a GRB-36D from the FICON project (redesignated JRB-36F), continued for a few months after this crash, but was also cancelled due to the violent ] induced by the ] of the B-36.<ref name="tomtom">Lockett, Brian. Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> | |||
with air flowing from left to right . The carburetor is bathed in air warmed by engine cooling, and so is unlikely to ice up. The B-36 employed the following ]: | |||
===Strategic reconnaissance=== | |||
air intake -- carburetor -- 28 cylinders -- propeller | |||
] RB-36Ds were deployed to the ]. This was the first RB-36 used in the ]n theater. While not employed in combat, these RB-36s conducted high-altitude aerial reconnaissance over Chinese ] and Soviet ].<ref>Hall, R. Cargill. "The Truth About Overflights: Military Reconnaissance Missions over Russia Before the U-2." ''Quarterly Journal of Military History'', Spring 1997.</ref>]] | |||
One of the SAC's initial missions was to plan strategic aerial reconnaissance on a global scale. The first efforts were in photo-reconnaissance and mapping. Along with the photo-reconnaissance mission, a small ] cadre operated. Weather reconnaissance was part of the effort, as was long-range detection of Soviet atomic explosions. In the late 1940s, strategic intelligence on Soviet capabilities and intentions was scarce. Before the development of the ] high-altitude spy plane and ] orbital reconnaissance satellites, technology and politics limited American reconnaissance efforts to the borders, of the Soviet Union.<ref>Wack, Fred J. ''The Secret Explorers: Saga of the 46th/72nd Reconnaissance Squadrons''. Self-published, 1990.</ref> | |||
Because the carburetor is now in front of the engine, it cannot benefit from engine heat. Hence when the intake air was cold and humid, ice gradually obstructed the carburetor air intake, increasing the richness of the air/fuel mixture, until the unburned fuel in the exhaust caught fire. Engine fires of this nature led to the first loss of an American ], described above. Adding electric heating to the carburetor intakes eliminated the problem.{{fact}} | |||
One of the essential criteria of the early postwar reconnaissance aircraft was the ability to cruise above {{cvt|40000|ft}}, a level partly determined by knowledge of the capability of Soviet ]. The main Soviet air-defense radar in the 1950s was the American-supplied ], or locally made copies, which were only effective up to {{cvt|40000|ft}}{{snd}} in theory, and an aircraft cruising above this level likely would remain undetected.<ref name="B361">{{cite book |last1=Jacobsen |first1=Meyers K. |title=Convair B-36: A Comprehensive History of America's 'Big Stick' |date=1997 |publisher=Schiffer Military History |location=Atglen, PA |isbn=0764305301}}</ref>{{page needed|date=August 2020}} | |||
===Crew experience=== | |||
Training missions were typically in two parts, first a 40 hour flight, followed by some time on the ground for refueling and a bit of maintenance, then a 24 hour second flight. When thinking about missions of such great duration, two facts should be kept in mind: | |||
*Given a sufficiently light load, the B-36 could fly at least 10,000 miles (16,000 km) nonstop; | |||
*The highest cruising speed of any version, the B-36J-III, was only 230 mph (380 km/h). Turning the jet engines on could raise the cruising speed to over 400 mph (650 km/h), but the resulting higher fuel consumption reduced the range. | |||
Hence a 40 hour mission, with the jets used only for takeoff and climbing, flew about 9200 miles (15000 km). Many missions were flown "around the flag pole"; they began and ended at the same base.{{fact}} | |||
The first aircraft to put this theory to the test was the RB-36D specialized ] version of the {{nowrap|B-36D}}. It was outwardly identical to the standard B-36D, but carried a crew of 22 rather than 15, the additional crew members being needed to operate the reconnaissance equipment carried. The forward bomb bay was filled with a pressurized, manned compartment with 14 cameras and a ], where a photo technician would develop the film. The second bomb bay contained up to 80 T-86 ]s, while the third bay could carry an extra {{cvt|3000|USgal|L|order=flip}} droppable fuel tank. The fourth bomb bay carried ] equipment. The full defensive armament was retained. The extra fuel tanks increased the flight endurance to up to 50 hours and it had an operational ceiling of {{cvt|50000|ft}}. Later, a lightweight version of this aircraft, the RB-36-III, could reach {{cvt|58000|ft}}. RB-36s were distinguished by the bright aluminum finish of the camera compartment (contrasting with the dull magnesium of the rest of the fuselage) and by a series of ] under the aft fuselage, varying in number and placement. When developed, it was the only American aircraft large enough to carry the bulky, high-resolution cameras of the day.{{Citation needed|date=September 2022}} | |||
The B-36 was not a sprightly aircraft: Lieutenant General James Edmundson likened it to "...sitting on your front porch and flying your house around."<ref>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/filmmore/reference/interview/edmund10.html</ref> Despite its immense exterior size, the pressurized crew compartments were relatively cramped, especially when occupied for 24 hours by a crew of fifteen in full flight kit. Although the rear compartment included six bunks, and the radio compartment behind the flight deck included a couple of bunks, crewmen usually chose to sleep in their seats.{{fact}} | |||
] | |||
War missions would have been essentially one-way: taking off from forward bases in Alaska or Greenland, overflying the USSR, and landing in Europe or the Middle East. The recollections of crew veterans reveal that while crews were confident of their ability to complete a mission if called upon to do so, they were less confident of surviving the weapon delivery itself.<ref>http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/main.asp?webtag=B36forum</ref> These concerns were borne out by the 1954 ] tests, in which B-36s flew near atmospheric detonations in the 15 megaton range, at distances believed typical of wartime delivery, and experienced serious heat and blast damage.{{fact}} | |||
The standard RB-36D carried up to 23 cameras, primarily K-17C, K-22A, K-38, and K-40 cameras. A special ] (known as the Boston Camera after the university where it was designed) was tested on 44-92088, the aircraft being redesignated ERB-36D. The long focal length was achieved by using a two-mirror reflection system and could resolve a golf ball from {{cvt|45000|ft}} and up to {{cvt|63600|ft}} away. | |||
The first RB-36D (44-92088) made its initial flight on 18 December 1949, six months after the B-36D, but initially flew without turbojets. The ] based at ], ], received its first RB-36D on 3 June 1950 but due to severe material shortages, they were not operational until June 1951. The 24th and last RB-36D was delivered in May 1951. Some RB-36Ds were later modified to the featherweight configuration, in which all but the tail guns were removed and the crew reduced from 22 to 19. These aircraft were redesignated as RB-36D-III. Modifications were carried out by Convair from February to November 1954.{{Citation needed|date=September 2022}} | |||
===Experiments=== | |||
] | |||
The B-36 was employed in a variety of aeronautical experiments throughout its service life. Its immense size, range and payload capacity lent itself to use in research and development programs. These included nuclear propulsion studies, and "parasite" programs in which the B-36 carried smaller interceptors or reconnaissance aircraft.{{fact}} | |||
With a range of {{cvt|9300|mi}}, RB-36Ds began probing the Arctic boundaries of the Soviet Union in 1951. Although on-board equipment indicated detection by Soviet radar, interceptions at the B-36's service ceiling remained difficult. RB-36 aircraft operating from ] in England made a number of overflights of Soviet Arctic bases, particularly the new nuclear weapons test complex at ]. RB-36s performed a number of rarely acknowledged reconnaissance missions and are believed to have frequently penetrated Chinese (and Soviet) ] under the direction of General Curtis LeMay.<ref name="B361"/>{{page needed|date=August 2020}} | |||
In May 1946, the Air Force began the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project which was followed in May 1951 by the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program. The ANP program required that Convair modify two B-36s under the MX-1589 project. One of the modified B-36s studied shielding requirements for an airborne reactor to determine whether a ] was feasible. The Nuclear Test Aircraft (NTA) was a B-36H-20-CF (Serial Number 51-5712) that had been damaged in a tornado at ] on September 1, 1952. This plane, designated the NB-36H, was modified to carry a 1 MW, air-cooled ] in the aft bomb bay, with a 4 ton lead shield between the reactor and the cockpit. The cockpit was encased in lead and rubber, with a 6-inch (15 cm)–thick ] windshield. The reactor was operational but did not power the plane; its sole purpose was to investigate the effect of radiation on aircraft systems. Between ] and ], the NB-36H completed 47 test flights and 215 hours of flight time, during 89 of which the reactor was critical. The NB-36H was scrapped at Fort Worth in ] when the nuclear aircraft program was abandoned.{{fact}} | |||
In early 1950, Convair began converting B-36As for reconnaissance, including the sole YB-36, which were all redesignated RB-36E. The R-4360-25 engines were replaced by R-4360-41s and were fitted with four J-47 jet engines as on the RB-36D. Its normal crew was 22, which included five gunners. The last conversion was completed in July 1951. The USAF later bought 73 long-range reconnaissance versions of the B-36H under the designation RB-36H. Of these, 23 were accepted during the first six months of 1952, and the last were delivered by September 1953. More than a third of all B-36s were reconnaissance models.{{Citation needed|date=September 2022}} | |||
Other experiments involved providing the B-36 with its own fighter defense in the form of ] carried partially or wholly in a bomb bay. One parasite aircraft was the tiny McDonnell ], which docked using a trapeze system. The concept was tested successfully using a B-29 carrier, but docking proved difficult even for experienced test pilots. Moreover, the XF-85 was seen as no match for Soviet aircraft, and the project was cancelled.{{fact}} | |||
Advances in Soviet air defense systems limited the RB-36 to flying outside the Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe. In the mid-1950s, the jet-powered Boeing ] continued to penetrate Soviet airspace and conducted a variety of spectacular and highly illegal overflights of the Soviet Union, where they took photographic and radar recordings of the routes SAC bombers would follow. Flights that involved penetrating mainland Russia were termed sensitive intelligence (SENSINT) missions. | |||
More successful was the ], involving a modified B-36, a GRB-36D "mothership", carrying an ] fighter modified for reconnaissance, the RF-84K, in a bomb bay. The B-36 would ferry the RF-84K to the vicinity of the objective, whereupon the RF-84K would disconnect and begin its mission. Ten GRB-36Ds and 25 RF-84ks were built and saw active service until 1959. | |||
As with the strategic bombardment versions, the RB-36 was phased out of the SAC inventory beginning in 1956, the last being sent to ] in January 1959.{{Citation needed|date=August 2019}} | |||
Projects TIP TOW and ] involved docking F-84s to the wingtips of B-29s and B-36s. The hope was that the increased ] of the combined aircraft would result in a greater range. Project TIP TOW was canceled when the combination of two EF-84Ds and a specially modified test EB-29A crashed, killing everyone on all three aircraft. This accident was attributed to one of the EF-84Ds flipping over onto the wing of the EB-29A. Project Tom-Tom, involving RF-84Fs and a GRB-36D from the FICON project (redesignated JRB-36F), continued for a few months after this crash, but was also canceled due to the violent turbulence induced by the ] of the B-36.<ref name="tomtom">{{cite web|url=http://www.air-and-space.com/tomtom.htm|title=Parasite Fighter Programs: Project Tom-Tom|publisher=Goleta Air and Space Museum|last=Lockett|first=Brian}}</ref> | |||
===Obsolescence=== | ===Obsolescence=== | ||
] | |||
The operational life of the B-36 ended because: | |||
* Long range jet-powered bombers became feasible, with cruising speeds more than double that of the B-36; | |||
* The speed and operating ceiling of jet interceptors steadily rose; | |||
* Radar-guided surface-to air missiles capable of reaching 20,000 meters emerged; | |||
* The airframe, especially the wings, proved vulnerable to metal fatigue; | |||
* Wing flexing led to fuel leakage, a common problem. | |||
The B-36 was gradually decommissioned as the ] entered service.{{fact}} | |||
With the appearance of the Soviet ] over ] in 1950, USAF propeller-driven bombers were made obsolete as strategic offensive weapons. Both the B-36 and the B-29/B-50 Superfortresses were designed during World War II, prior to the ]. A new generation of jet bombers, flying higher and faster, was needed to effectively overcome Soviet interceptors.{{citation needed|date=June 2015}} In 1952, while fighting continued during the ], the ], developed from the B-36, entered a design competition against the Boeing YB-52. By early 1953, the Boeing had emerged as the preferred design. | |||
===Survivors=== | |||
]]] | |||
Only four (and a half) aircraft survive from the 384 produced.{{fact}} | |||
*YB-36/RB-36E serial number 42-13571. This was the first prototype to be converted to the bubble canopy used on production B-36s. It was on display in the 1950's at the former Air Force Museum on ] near ]. When the Museum was moved to a different location on the base the cost of moving the bomber was more than simply flying a different B-36 to the new location and the aircraft was slated to be scrapped. Instead, Walter Soplata bought it and transported the pieces by truck to his farm in ], where it sits today in several large pieces.<ref>http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Fea1/101-200/Fea182_Walters-Farm_Williams/part1/Fea182.htm</ref> The center fuselage currently stores a complete P-47N still contained in its original shipping crate. | |||
*RB-36H serial number 51-13730, is on display at the ] in ]. | |||
*B-36J serial number 52-2217, is on display at the ] (formerly located at ]) and now near ]. | |||
*B-36J serial number 52-2220, is on display at the ] (formerly The U.S. Air Force Museum) at ] near ]. Its flight to the museum from Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona on April 30, 1959 was the last flight of a B-36. This B-36J replaced the former Air Force Museum's original YB-36 serial number 42-13571 (see above). This was also the first aircraft to be placed in the Museum's new display hangar, and was not moved again until relocated to the Museum's latest addition in 2003. It is displayed alongside the only surviving example of the massive 9 ft. XB-36 wheel and tire. | |||
*B-36J, serial number 52-2827, the final B-36 built, is now undergoing restoration and reassembly at the ] in ]. | |||
After fighting in Korea had ceased, ] called for a ]. His administration retired nearly all of its SAC B-29/B-50s in favour of the new B-47 Stratojet, introduced in 1951. By 1955, the B-52 Stratofortress was entering the inventory in substantial numbers, replacing B-36s.{{citation needed|date=June 2015}} | |||
==Related models== | |||
:''Main article: ]'' | |||
Two major factors contributing to the obsolescence of the B-36 and its phaseout were a lack of aerial refueling capability and its low speed which made it vulnerable to interceptors and severely decreased its ability to reach Soviet targets.{{citation needed|date=December 2015}} | |||
In 1951, the USAF asked Convair to build a prototype all-jet variant of the B-36. Convair complied by adding swept wings and eight ] jet engines to a B-36F. The result was the B-36G, later renamed the ]. Although the YB-60 could carry a heavier bomb load than the YB-52, it did not go forward because it was also over 100 mph (160 km/h) slower and suffered from handling problems.<ref>http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/bombers/b3-81.htm</ref> | |||
] in Tucson in 1958]] | |||
The B-36 was the basis for the ], a double-decked military cargo aircraft, the longest practical aircraft (185 ft, 56 m) of its era. Only one example was ever built; it was extensively employed for nearly a decade, especially for cross-country cargo flights during the ]. In 2005 the XC-99 was dismantled and moved from the former Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, where it has been retired since 1957. It is currently being transported in pieces to the ] at ] near ] aboard C-5 Galaxy transports as space and schedule permits.{{fact}} | |||
The scrapping of B-36s began in February 1956. Once replaced by B-52s, they were flown directly from squadrons to ], ], where the Mar-Pak Corporation handled their reclamation and destruction. Defense cutbacks in FY 1958 stretched out B-52 procurement and B-36 service life had to be extended. B-36s still in service were supported with parts taken from aircraft sent to Davis–Monthan. Further update work was undertaken by Convair at San Diego (Specialized Aircraft Maintenance, SAM-SAC) until 1957 to extend the service life of the B-36s. By December 1958, only 22 were still operational. | |||
On 12 February 1959, the last B-36J built, USAF Serial No. 52-2827, left ], Texas, where it had been on duty with the ], and was flown to ] in Fort Worth, where it was put on display. Within two years, all B-36s, except five used for museum display, had been scrapped.{{Citation needed|date=September 2022}} | |||
A commercial airliner derived from the XC-99, the ], never left the drawing board. It would have been the first "jumbo" airliner.{{fact}} | |||
==Variants== | |||
==B-36 in the Media== | |||
{{Main|Convair B-36 Peacemaker variants}} | |||
The B-36 appeared in only one motion picture, '']'' (1955), starring ] and ]. In the film Jimmy Stewart's character is forced to crash land his B-36 in the Arctic. '']'' features many good aerial shots of B-36s and ]s. | |||
{| class = "wikitable sortable" style = "float:right; font-size:90%; margin-left:15px" | |||
|- | |||
!Variant!!Built | |||
|- | |||
|XB-36|| {{right|1}} | |||
|- | |||
|YB-36|| {{right|1}} | |||
|- | |||
|B-36A|| {{right|22}} | |||
|- | |||
|]|| {{right|1}} | |||
|- | |||
|B-36B|| {{right|62}} | |||
|- | |||
|B-36D|| {{right|22}} | |||
|- | |||
|RB-36D|| {{right|24}} | |||
|- | |||
|B-36F|| {{right|34}} | |||
|- | |||
|RB-36F|| {{right|24}} | |||
|- | |||
|B-36H|| {{right|83}} | |||
|- | |||
|RB-36H|| {{right|73}} | |||
|- | |||
|B-36J|| {{right|33}} | |||
|- | |||
|]|| {{right|2}} | |||
|- style="border-top:1px solid #999;" | |||
|'''Total'''|| {{right|'''385'''}}<ref name="knaack1988">{{cite tech report |last1=Knaack |first1=Marcelle Size |title=Encyclopedia of U.S. Air Force aircraft and missile systems |volume=II Post World War II Bombers |url=https://media.defense.gov/2010/May/26/2001330264/-1/-1/0/AFD-100526-026.pdf |publisher=Office of Air Force History |isbn=0912799595 |via=media.defense.gov |date=1988 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230308105438/https://media.defense.gov/2010/May/26/2001330264/-1/-1/0/AFD-100526-026.pdf |archive-date=March 8, 2023 |url-status=live }}</ref>{{rp|53}} | |||
|} | |||
;XB-36 | |||
==Specifications (B-36J-III)== | |||
:Unarmed prototype powered by six {{cvt|3000|hp}} R-4360-25 engines, one built. | |||
{{aircraft specifications | |||
;YB-36 | |||
<!-- if you do not understand how to use this template, please ask at ] --> | |||
:Prototype, s/n 42-13571,<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718092450/http://www.aero-web.org/specs/convair/yb-36.htm |date=18 July 2011 }} AeroWeb. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> with modified nose and raised cockpit roof, one built, later converted to YB-36A. | |||
;YB-36A | |||
:Former YB-36 with modified four-wheel landing gear, later modified as a RB-36E. | |||
;B-36A | |||
:Unarmed interim production variant, used for training, 22 built, all but one converted to RB-36E. | |||
;] | |||
:A cargo/transport version of the B-36. One built. | |||
;B-36B | |||
:Armed production variant with six {{cvt|3500|hp}} R-4360-41 engines, 73 built, later conversions to RB-36D and B-36D. | |||
;RB-36B | |||
:Designation for 39 B-36Bs temporarily fitted with a camera installation. | |||
;YB-36C | |||
:Projected variant of the B-36B with six {{cvt|4300|hp}} R-4360-51 engines driving tractor propellers, not built. | |||
;B-36C | |||
:Production version of the YB-36, completed as B-36Bs. | |||
;B-36D | |||
:Same as B-36B, but fitted with four J47-GE-19 engines, two each in two underwing pods, 22 built and 64 conversions from B-36B. | |||
;RB-36D | |||
:Strategic reconnaissance variant with two bomb bays fitted with camera installation, 17 built and seven conversions from B-36B. | |||
;GRB-36D | |||
:Same as RB-36D, but modified to carry a ] on a ventral trapeze as part of the FICON program, 10 modified. | |||
;RB-36E | |||
:The YB-36A and 21 B-36As converted to RB-36D standards. | |||
;B-36F | |||
:Same as B-36D, but fitted with six {{cvt|3800|hp}} R-4360-53 engines and four J47-GE-19 engines, 34 built. | |||
;RB-36F | |||
:Strategic reconnaissance variant of the B-36F with additional fuel capacity, 24 built. | |||
;YB-36G | |||
:See YB-60. | |||
;B-36H | |||
:Same as B-36F with improved cockpit and equipment changes, 83 built. | |||
;] | |||
:One B-36H fitted with a nuclear reactor installation for trials, had a revised cockpit and raised nose. This was intended to evolve into the ]. | |||
;RB-36H | |||
:Strategic reconnaissance variant of the B-36H, 73 built. | |||
;B-36J | |||
:High altitude variant with strengthened landing gear, increased fuel capacity, armament reduced to tail guns only and reduced crew, 33 built. | |||
;] | |||
:Originally designated the YB-36G, s/n 49-2676 and 49-2684.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718104138/http://www.aero-web.org/specs/convair/yb-36g.htm |date=18 July 2011 }} ''AeroWeb''. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> Project for a jet-powered swept wing variant. Due to the differences from a standard B-36 its designation was changed to YB-60. | |||
;Model 6 | |||
:Proposed double-deck airliner marrying the fuselage of the B-36 with the wings and empennage of the YB-60; not built.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://hushkit.net/2012/08/07/artists-impressions-of-concept-aircraft-1950-90-a-gallery/convair_model_6_jet_airliner/|title = Convair Model 6 Jet Airliner|date = 7 August 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://aviationtrivia.blogspot.com/2010/06/people-sometimes-ask-me-how-i-decide.html|title = Tails Through Time: The Convair Model 6: A Jumbo Before Its Time|date = 21 June 2010}}</ref> | |||
===Related models=== | |||
<!-- please answer the following questions --> | |||
] | |||
|plane or copter?=plane | |||
], Texas, 23 November 1949]] | |||
|jet or prop?=both | |||
In 1951, the USAF asked Convair to build an all-jet B-36. Convair replaced a B-36F's wings with swept wings, from which were suspended eight ] jet engines. The result was the B-36G, later renamed the ]. The YB-60 was inferior to Boeing's YB-52, and was terminated.<ref name="NMUSAFyb60"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071115224605/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2750 |date=15 November 2007 }} National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> The B-36 was the basis for the ], a double-decked military transport that was the largest piston-engined, land-based transport aircraft built. Its length of {{cvt|185|ft}} made it the longest practical aircraft of its era. The sole example was used for nearly 10 years, especially for Korean War cross-country cargo flights. In 2005, it was dismantled in anticipation of its being moved from the former ], now the Kelly Field Annex of ] in ], where it had been stored since 1957. The XC-99 was then relocated to the National Museum of the United States Air Force at Wright-Patterson AFB for restoration, with C-5 Galaxy transports carrying XC-99 pieces there.<ref name="AFL04">Hill, 1st Lt Bruce R. Jr. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071103143301/http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123007543 |date=3 November 2007 }} ''433rd Airlift Wing Public Affairs'', 22 April 2004.</ref> | |||
A commercial airliner derived from the XC-99, the ], never left the drawing board.<ref name="NMUSAF"/> | |||
<!-- Now, fill out the specs. Please include units where appropriate (main comes first, alt in parentheses). If an item doesn't apply, like capacity, leave it blank. For additional lines, end your alt units with a right parenthesis ")" and start a new, fully-formatted line with beginning with an asterisk "*" --> | |||
|ref={{fact}} | |||
|crew=9 | |||
|capacity= | |||
|length main=162 ft 1 in | |||
|length alt=49.40 m | |||
|span main=230 ft 0 in | |||
|span alt=70.10 m | |||
|height main=46 ft 9 in | |||
|height alt=14.25 m | |||
|area main=4,772 ft² | |||
|area alt=443.3 m² | |||
|airfoil=] root, NACA 63(420)-517 tip | |||
|empty weight main=171,035 lb | |||
|empty weight alt=77,580 kg | |||
|loaded weight main=266,100 lb | |||
|loaded weight alt=120,700 kg | |||
|max takeoff weight main=410,000 lb | |||
|max takeoff weight alt=190,000 kg | |||
==Operators== | |||
|engine (jet)=] | |||
;{{flag|United States|1912}} | |||
|type of jet=]s | |||
''']''' – ]<ref> strategic-air-command.com. Retrieved: 14 June 2010.</ref><br> | |||
|number of jets=4 | |||
] | |||
|thrust main=5,200 lbf | |||
: ] – ], Puerto Rico (October 1952 – January 1959) | |||
|thrust alt=23 kN | |||
::60th and 301st Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Square F | |||
|engine (prop)=]-53 "Wasp Major" | |||
] | |||
|type of prop=] | |||
: ] – ], New Mexico (August 1952 – August 1957) | |||
|number of props=6 | |||
::24th, 39th and 40th Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Triangle R | |||
|power main=3,800 hp | |||
: ] – ], Texas (June 1948 – May 1958) | |||
|power alt=2,500 kW | |||
::9th, 436th and 492d Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Triangle J | |||
: ] – ], Texas (December 1948 – December 1957) | |||
::26th, 42d and 98th Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Triangle U | |||
: ] – ], South Dakota (May 1949 – April 1950) | |||
::77th, 717th and 718th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle X | |||
: ], ], Maine (April 1953 – September 1956) | |||
::69th, 70th and 75th Bombardment Squadrons | |||
] | |||
: ] – ], Washington (July 1951 – March 1956) | |||
::325th, 326th and 327th Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle W | |||
: ] – ], Texas (August 1953 – February 1959) | |||
::334th, 335th and 336th Bombardment Squadrons | |||
: ] – Fairfield-Suisun AFB (later ]), California (January 1951 – September 1958) | |||
::5th, 31st and 72d Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle X | |||
: ] – Fairfield-Suisun AFB, California (May 1949 – April 1950) | |||
::1st Bombardment Squadron | |||
: ] – ], Washington (August 1951 – September 1956) | |||
::346th, 347th and 348th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle I | |||
Note: SAC eliminated tail codes in 1953. | |||
|max speed main=420 mph | |||
|max speed alt=365 knots, 685 km/h | |||
|max speed more=with jets on | |||
|cruise speed main=230 mph | |||
|cruise speed alt=200 knots, 380 km/h | |||
|cruise speed more=with jets off | |||
|combat radius main=6,800 mi | |||
|combat radius alt=5,900 nm, 11,000 km | |||
|ferry range main=10,000 mi | |||
|ferry range alt=8,700 nm, 16,000 km | |||
|ceiling main=48,000 ft | |||
|ceiling alt=15,000 m | |||
|climb rate main=1,920 ft/min | |||
|climb rate alt=9.75 m/s | |||
|loading main=55.76 lb/ft² | |||
|loading alt=272.3 kg/m² | |||
|thrust/weight=0.078 | |||
|power/mass main=0.086 hp/lb | |||
|power/mass alt=120 W/kg | |||
==Surviving aircraft== | |||
|guns=2× ] (0.787 in) ] ]|bombs=86,000 lb (39,000 kg) | |||
{{as of|2022}} four complete B-36 type aircraft survive from the original 384 produced.<ref name="yenne2004" />{{rp|149}} | |||
;RB-36H | |||
].]] | |||
* AF Ser. No. 51-13730 is at ] at the former ] in ]. Previously displayed at the former ] in ] from 1957 to 1991.<ref> Castle Air Museum. Retrieved: 14 December 2017.</ref> | |||
;B-36J | |||
}} | |||
].]] | |||
].]] | |||
].]] | |||
* AF Ser. No. 52-2217 is at the ], formerly located at ], and now off-base near ].<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140531043645/http://www.sasmuseum.com/aircraft/b-36j-peacemaker/ |date=31 May 2014 }} SAC Museum. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> | |||
* AF Ser. No. 52-2220 is at the ] at ]. Its flight to the museum from Davis–Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona on 30 April 1959 was the last flight of a B-36. This B-36J replaced the former Air Force Museum's original YB-36. This was the first aircraft placed in the museum's new display hangar. It is displayed alongside the massive {{cvt|9|ft}} lower main gear strut, single wheel and tire from the XB-36.<ref> National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 14 December 2017.</ref> | |||
* AF Ser. No. 52-2827 is at the ], adjacent to Davis–Monthan Air Force Base in ]. This aircraft was the final B-36 built, named ''The City of Fort Worth'', and lent to the city of Fort Worth on 12 February 1959. It sat on the field at the ] until that airfield was closed and the property was redeveloped adjacent to ]. Some attempts were made to begin restoration at that location through the early 1970s. It then moved to the short-lived ], between the former ] (now ]) and the former ] (now ]) assembly plant, where it was originally built. Some restoration took place there. As Lockheed Martin had no room to display it, and efforts in Fort Worth to build a facility fell short, the NMUSAF repossessed the aircraft and it was transported to Tucson for loan to the Pima Air and Space Museum. It was fully restored and reassembled at that museum, just south of Davis–Monthan AFB, and is displayed there.<ref> Pima Air & Space Museum. Retrieved: 9 April 2012.</ref> | |||
==Notable incidents and accidents== | |||
==Media== | |||
Though the B-36 had a good overall safety record, well above average for the class and time, 10 B-36s were involved in accidents between 1949 and 1954 (three B-36Bs, three B-36Ds, and four B-36Hs).<ref name="B-36 wrecks">Lockett, Brian. Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> A total of 32 B-36s were written off in accidents between 1949 and 1957 of 385 built.<ref name="jenkins2002" />{{rp|238}} When a crash occurred, the ]-rich airframe burned easily.<ref>Lockett, Brian. Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com, 30 July 2003. Retrieved: 23 September 2007.</ref> | |||
{{multi-video start}} | |||
{{multi-video item|filename=B-36 bomber.ogg|title=B-36 construction and features.ogg|description= Video clip of the construction and features of the B-36 bomber.|format=]}} | |||
{{multi-video end}} | |||
On 14 February 1950 off the northwest coast of ] on ], 17 crew ]; 12 crewmen were found with one injured, and five were missing.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.gendisasters.com/british-columbia/14168/mount-kologet-bc-bomber-crash-feb-1950 |title=Gen disasters |access-date=10 December 2020 |archive-date=5 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200705191043/http://www.gendisasters.com/british-columbia/14168/mount-kologet-bc-bomber-crash-feb-1950 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
==References== | |||
<!--See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags--> | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
* {{cite journal | |||
|last=Ford | |||
|first=Daniel | |||
|url=http://www.airspacemag.com/ASM/Mag/Index/1996/AM/bacr.html | |||
|title=B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads | |||
|journal=Air and Space/Smithsonian | |||
|date=April 1996}} | |||
* {{cite book | |||
|last=Jacobsen | |||
|first=Meyers K. | |||
|year=1997 | |||
|title=Convair B-36: A Comprehensive History of America's "Big Stick" | |||
|location=Atglen | |||
|publisher=Schiffer Military History | |||
|id=ISBN 0-7643-0974-9}} | |||
* {{cite book | |||
|last=Jenkins | |||
|first=Dennis R. | |||
|year=1999 | |||
|title=Convair B-36 Peacemaker | |||
|publisher=Specialty Press Publishers and Wholsalers | |||
|id=ISBN 1-58007-019-1}} | |||
* {{cite book | |||
|last=Jenkins | |||
|first=Dennis R | |||
|year=2001 | |||
|title=Magnesium Overcast | |||
|location=Minnesota | |||
|publisher=Voyageur Press | |||
|id=ISBN 1-58007-042-6}} | |||
* {{cite web | |||
|last=Morris | |||
|first=Lt. Col. (ret.) Ted Allan | |||
|date=©2000 | |||
|url=http://www.zianet.com/tmorris/b36.html | |||
|title=Flying the Aluminum and Magnesium Overcast | |||
|work=The collected articles and photographs of Ted A. Morris | |||
|accessdate=2006-09-04}}<br/> | |||
On Labor Day, Monday, 1 September 1952, a tornado hit Carswell Air Force Base, Fort Worth, damaging aircraft of the 7th and 11th Bomber Wings' complement of B-36s. Some two-thirds of the USAF's entire B-36 fleet was damaged, as well as six aircraft being built at that point at Convair's Fort Worth plant. The base was shut down and operations transferred to ]. Joint repairs by Convair and the USAF had repaired 18 of the 19 heavily damaged aircraft (and the six damaged and unfinished aircraft at Convair) by May 1953. One example was to be scrapped, but was used as a nuclear testing site ground target. Another heavily damaged aircraft was rebuilt as the ] Nuclear Reactor Testbed aircraft.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120301174913/http://www.cowtown.net/proweb/tornado/tornado.htm |date=1 March 2012 }} cotown.net, 27 August 2007. Retrieved: 4 April 2012.</ref> | |||
==Further reading== | |||
] | |||
* {{cite book | |||
|last=Jacobsen | |||
|first=Meyers K. | |||
|year=1999 | |||
|title=Convair B-36: A Photo Chronicle | |||
|location=Atglen | |||
|publisher=Schiffer Military History | |||
|id=ISBN 0-7643-0974-9}} | |||
* {{cite book | |||
|last=Jenkins | |||
|first=Dennis R | |||
|year=2003 | |||
|title=B-36 Photo Scrapbook | |||
|location=Minnesota | |||
|publisher=Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers | |||
|id=ISBN 1-58007-075-2}} | |||
* {{cite book | |||
|last=Pyeatt | |||
|first=Don | |||
|year=2006 | |||
|title=B-36: Saving the Last Peacemaker Third Edition | |||
|location=Texas | |||
|publisher=ProWeb Publishing | |||
|id=ISBN 0-9677593-2-3}} | |||
On February 2, 1953 Convair B-36H Serial No 51-5729 crashed 16 miles southwest of ], ], following a transatlantic flight from ]. The aircraft crashed in hilly wooded terrain. The investigation determined that a ] failure was at fault. Two of the 17 crew perished. | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* "'': Flying B-36 and B-47 planes.''". Race For the Superbomb. ] Online. | |||
On the night of 17 March 1953 RB-36H-25, 51-13721 departed the Canary Islands to test North American air defenses. Change in weather conditions drove the aircraft off course, and early in the morning on 18 March the aircraft collided with a mountain on the west side of Trinity Bay ({{Coord|48.184352|N|53.664271|W|display=inline|name=RB-36H-25}}) just north of ], Newfoundland, Canada. All 23 crew, including Brigadier General ], were killed.<ref> Retrieved: 21 Mar 2024.</ref> | |||
==Related content== | |||
{{portalpar|Military of the United States|Naval Jack of the United States.svg|65}} | |||
{{commons|B-36 Peacemaker}} | |||
{{aircontent | |||
] | |||
|sequence= | |||
B-36s were involved in two "]" incidents. On 13 February 1950, B-36 serial number ] of ], resulting in the first loss of an American atom bomb. The inert bomb's ] had been replaced with lead, but it did have ], and it detonated over the ocean before the crew bailed out.<ref>Pyeatt, Don. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090118032640/http://www.cowtown.net/proweb/brokenarrow3.htm |date=18 January 2009 }} cotown.net, 31 August 1998. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.</ref> Locating the crash site took some effort.<ref>Ricketts, Bruce. Mysteries of Canada, 11 January 2006. Retrieved: 17 August 2007.</ref> On 4 November 2016, however, an object similar to the bomb was reported to have been located by a diver near the ] archipelago , {{cvt|80|km|order=flip}} off the coast of British Columbia. The ] deployed vessels to investigate.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/04/canada-lost-nuke-found-cold-war-bomb |title=Diver may have found 'lost nuke' missing since cold war off Canada coast |newspaper=The Guardian |date=4 November 2016 |access-date=4 November 2016}}</ref> After investigation, the Royal Canadian Navy determined that it was not the lost bomb.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38112808 |title=Object found off British Columbia coast not missing nuke |work=BBC News |date=25 November 2016 |access-date=26 November 2016}}</ref> Later in 1954, the airframe, stripped of sensitive material, was substantially destroyed '']'' by a U.S. military recovery team. | |||
* '''U.S. Air Force:''' ] - ] - ] - '''B-36''' - ] - ] - ] | |||
* '''Convair:''' ] - ] - ] - '''35''' - '''36''' - ] - ] - ] | |||
On 22 May 1957, a B-36 accidentally dropped a ] ] {{cvt|4.5|mi}} away from the control tower while landing at ] in ], ]. The weapon had come loose from its mounts and fell through the bomb bay doors, and sending the aircraft into an uncontrollable climb due to the sudden and unexpected weight shift. Only the conventional explosives detonated, as the bomb was unarmed. The aircraft made a safe landing. These incidents remained classified for decades. See ].<ref name="B-36 wrecks"/><ref>Adler, Les. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190515060717/http://www.hkhinc.com/newmexico/albuquerque/doomsday/ |date=15 May 2019 }} ''Albuquerque Tribune'', 20 January 1994. Retrieved: 10 August 2009.</ref> | |||
|similar aircraft= | |||
* ] | |||
==Specifications (B-36J-III)== | |||
* ] | |||
] | |||
* ] | |||
] | |||
{{Aircraft specs | |||
|ref=National Museum of the U.S. Air Force<ref name="B36J factsheet"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090806073801/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2544 |date=6 August 2009 }}. National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 8 October 2010.</ref> | |||
|prime units?=imp | |||
|crew=13 | |||
|length ft=162 | |||
|length in=1 | |||
|span ft=230 | |||
|span in=0 | |||
|height ft=46 | |||
|height in=9 | |||
|wing area sqft=4772 | |||
|wing area note=<ref name="knaack1988" />{{rp|54–55}} | |||
|airfoil='''root:''' ]; '''tip:''' ]<ref name="Selig">{{cite web |last1=Lednicer |first1=David |title=The Incomplete Guide to Airfoil Usage |url=https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/ads/aircraft.html |website=m-selig.ae.illinois.edu |access-date=16 April 2019}}</ref> | |||
|empty weight lb=166165 | |||
|max takeoff weight lb=410000 | |||
|max takeoff weight note= | |||
|fuel capacity= | |||
<!-- Powerplant --> | |||
|eng1 number=6 | |||
|eng1 name=] | |||
|eng1 type=28-cylinder 4-row air-cooled radial piston engines | |||
|eng1 hp=3800 | |||
|eng1 note=for take-off | |||
|eng2 number=4 | |||
|eng2 name=] | |||
|eng2 type=] engines | |||
|eng2 lbf=5200 | |||
|eng2 note=in pylon mounted pods outboard of piston engines | |||
|prop blade number=3 | |||
|prop name=] constant-speed fully-feathering pusher propellers | |||
|prop dia ft= | |||
|prop dia in= | |||
|prop dia note= | |||
<!-- Performance --> | |||
|max speed mph=435 | |||
|cruise speed mph=230 | |||
|range miles= | |||
|range note= | |||
|combat range miles=3985 | |||
|ferry range miles=10000 | |||
|ferry range note=<ref name="knaack1988" />{{rp|54–55}} | |||
|endurance=<!-- if range unknown --> | |||
|ceiling ft=43600 | |||
|ceiling note= | |||
|climb rate ftmin=1995 | |||
|climb rate note= | |||
|wing loading lb/sqft= | |||
|wing loading note= | |||
|fuel consumption lb/mi= | |||
|power/weight= | |||
|thrust/weight= | |||
<!-- Armament --> | |||
|guns=1 remotely operated tail turret with 2 × ] ]<ref name="knaack1988" />{{rp|54–55}} | |||
|bombs={{cvt|86000|lb|kg}} with weight restrictions, {{cvt|72000|lb}} normal<ref name="knaack1988" />{{rp|54–55}} | |||
|avionics= | |||
}} | |||
==Notable appearances in media== | |||
<!-- All content about the aircraft in fictional and gaming use has been moved to ], please see ] --> | |||
{{Main|Aircraft in fiction#B-36 Peacemaker}} | |||
In 1949, the B-36 was featured in the documentary film, ''Target: Peace'', about the operations of the 7th Bombardment Wing at ]. Other scenes included B-36 production at the Fort Worth plant. | |||
'']'' is a 1955 American film starring ] as a ] star and World War II veteran who is called back to active duty to become a B-36 pilot and flight commander for SAC. | |||
The documentary '']'' (2004) chronicles a 2003 Canadian expedition to find the first lost nuclear weapon which traveled to the mountain site of the 1950 ] B-36 crash.<ref>Jorgenson, Michael, producer. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090818082921/http://www.telefilm.gc.ca/data/production/prod_3152.asp?lang=en&cat=tv&g=doc&y=2004 |date=18 August 2009 }} Myth Merchant Films, Spruce Grove, Alberta, 2004.</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Portal|Aviation}} | |||
{{aircontent | |||
|related= | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
|similar aircraft= | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
|lists= | |lists= | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
|see also= | |see also= | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * "]" | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{Convair aircraft}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
==References== | |||
] | |||
===Notes=== | |||
] | |||
{{Reflist|group=N}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
===Citations=== | |||
{{Link FA|no}} | |||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
===Bibliography=== | |||
* Barlow, Jeffrey G. ''Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945–1950''. Washington, D.C.: Naval Historical Center, 1994. {{ISBN|0-16-042094-6}}. | |||
* Ford, Daniel. ''Air and Space/Smithsonian'', April 1996. Retrieved: 3 February 2007. | |||
* Grant, R.G. and John R. Dailey. ''Flight: 100 Years of Aviation''. Harlow, Essex, UK: DK Adult, 2007. {{ISBN|978-0-7566-1902-2}}. | |||
* Jacobsen, Meyers K. ''Convair B-36: A Comprehensive History of America's "Big Stick"''. Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer Military History, 1997. {{ISBN|0-7643-0974-9}}. | |||
* Jacobsen, Meyers K. ''Convair B-36: A Photo Chronicle''. Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer Military History, 1999. {{ISBN|0-7643-0974-9}}. | |||
* Jacobsen, Meyers K. "Peacemaker." ''Airpower'', Vol. 4, No. 6, November 1974. | |||
* Jacobsen, Meyers K. and Ray Wagner. ''B-36 in Action (Aircraft in Action Number 42)''. Carrollton, Texas: Squadron/Signal Publications Inc., 1980. {{ISBN|0-89747-101-6}}. | |||
* Jenkins, Dennis R. ''B-36 Photo Scrapbook''. St. Paul, Minnesota: Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers, 2003. {{ISBN|1-58007-075-2}}. | |||
* Jenkins, Dennis R. ''Convair B-36 Peacemaker''. St. Paul, Minnesota: Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers, 1999. {{ISBN|1-58007-019-1}}. | |||
* Jenkins, Dennis R. ''Magnesium Overcast: The Story of the Convair B-36''. North Branch, Minnesota: Specialty Press, 2002., {{ISBN|978-1-58007-129-1}}. | |||
* Johnsen, Frederick A. ''Thundering Peacemaker, the B-36 Story in Words and Pictures''. Tacoma, Washington: Bomber Books, 1978. | |||
* Knaack, Marcelle Size. ''Encyclopedia of U.S. Air Force aircraft and missile systems '' Volume II: Post-World War II Bombers, 1945–1973. Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, 1988. {{ISBN|0-16-002260-6}}. | |||
* Leach, Norman S. ''Broken Arrow: America's First Lost Nuclear Weapon''. Calgary, Alberta: Red Deer Press, 2008. {{ISBN|978-0-88995-348-2}}. | |||
* Miller, Jay and Roger Cripliver. "B-36: The Ponderous Peacemaker." ''Aviation Quarterly'', Vol. 4, No. 4, 1978. | |||
* Miller, Jay. "Tip Tow & Tom-Tom". '']'', No. 9, February–May 1979, pp. 40–42. {{ISSN|0143-5450}}. | |||
* Morris, Lt. Col. (ret.) and Ted Allan. ''The collected articles and photographs of Ted A. Morris'', 2000. Retrieved: 4 September 2006. | |||
* Orman, Edward W. "One Thousand on Top: A Gunner's View of Flight from the Scanning Blister of a B-36." ''Airpower'', Vol. 17, No. 2, March 1987. | |||
* Peacock, Lindsay. "B-36: Convair's "Big Stick": Part One". '']'', Vol. 39, No. 4, October 1990. pp. 230–234. {{issn|0306-5634}}. | |||
* Peacock, Lindsay. "B-36: Convair's "Big Stick": Part Two". ''Air International'', Vol. 39, No. 5, November 1990. pp. 279–286, 306. {{issn|0306-5634}}. | |||
* Puryear, Edgar. ''Stars in Flight''. Novato, California: Presidio Press, 1981. {{ISBN|0-89141-128-3}} | |||
* Pyeatt, Don. ''B-36: Saving the Last Peacemaker (Third Edition)''. Fort Worth, Texas: ProWeb Publishing, 2006. {{ISBN|0-9677593-2-3}}. | |||
* Shiel, Walter P. ''cessnawarbirds.com''. Retrieved: 19 July 2009. | |||
* Taylor, John W.R. "Convair B-36." ''Combat Aircraft of the World from 1909 to the present''. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1969. {{ISBN|0-425-03633-2}}. | |||
* Thomas, Tony. ''A Wonderful Life: The Films and Career of James Stewart''. Secaucus, New Jersey: Citadel Press, 1988. {{ISBN|0-8065-1081-1}}. | |||
* Wagner, Ray. ''American Combat Planes''. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1968. {{ISBN|0-385-04134-9}}. | |||
* Wilson, Stewart. ''Combat Aircraft since 1945.'' London: Aerospace Publications, 2000. {{ISBN|1-875671-50-1}}. | |||
* Winchester, Jim. "Convair B-36". ''Military Aircraft of the Cold War (The Aviation Factfile)''. Rochester, Kent, UK: The Grange plc., 2006. {{ISBN|1-84013-929-3}}. | |||
* Wolk, Herman S. ''Fulcrum of Power: Essays on the United States Air Force and National Security''. Darby, Pennsylvania: Diane Publishing, 2003. {{ISBN|1-4289-9008-9}}. | |||
* Yenne, Bill. "Convair B-36 Peacemaker." ''International Air Power Review'', Vol. 13, Summer 2004. London: AirTime Publishing Inc., 2004. {{ISBN|1-880588-84-6}}. | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Commons category multi|Convair B-36 Peacemaker}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* , '']'', April 1954, pp. 98–102, 264. | |||
* | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110131172413/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/filmmore/reference/interview/edmund10.html |date=31 January 2011 }}. ] Online. | |||
* | |||
* , ''Popular Mechanics'', September 1950 | |||
* | |||
* – | |||
{{Consolidated aircraft}} | |||
{{Convair aircraft}} | |||
{{USAF bomber aircraft}} | |||
{{Nuclear propulsion}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2019}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 22:48, 15 December 2024
US Air Force strategic bomber (1949–1959)B-36 "Peacemaker" | |
---|---|
Beginning with the B-36D (B-36J shown), the Peacemaker used 6 radial piston engines and 4 jet engines. | |
General information | |
Type | Strategic bomber |
National origin | United States |
Manufacturer | Convair |
Primary user | United States Air Force |
Number built | 384 |
History | |
Manufactured | 1946–1954 |
Introduction date | 1948 |
First flight | 8 August 1946 |
Retired | 12 February 1959 |
Variants | Convair XC-99 Convair NB-36H |
Developed into | Convair YB-60 Convair X-6 |
The Convair B-36 "Peacemaker" is a strategic bomber built by Convair and operated by the United States Air Force (USAF) from 1949 to 1959. The B-36 is the largest mass-produced piston-engined aircraft ever built, although it was exceeded in span and weight by the one-off Hughes H-4 Hercules. It has the longest wingspan of any combat aircraft. The B-36 was capable of intercontinental flight without refueling.
Entering service in 1948, the B-36 was the primary nuclear weapons delivery vehicle of Strategic Air Command (SAC) until it was replaced by the jet-powered Boeing B-52 Stratofortress beginning in 1955. All but four aircraft have been scrapped.
Development
The design of the B-36 can be traced to early 1941, prior to the entry of the United States into World War II. At the time, Britain was at risk of falling to the Nazi "Blitz" attacks, making strategic bombing attacks by the United States Army Air Corps (USAAC) against Germany impossible with the aircraft available.
The United States would need a new bomber to reach Europe and return to bases in North America, necessitating a combat range of at least 5,700 mi (9,200 km), the length of a Gander, Newfoundland–Berlin round trip. The USAAC therefore sought a bomber of truly intercontinental range. The German Reichsluftfahrtministerium's (RLM) would request the similar ultralong-range Amerikabomber program on 12 May 1942.
The USAAC sent out an initial request on 11 April 1941, asking for a 450 mph (720 km/h) top speed, a 275 mph (443 km/h) cruising speed, a service ceiling of 45,000 ft (14,000 m) and a maximum range of 12,000 mi (19,000 km) at 25,000 ft (7,600 m). These requirements were too demanding and far exceeded the technology of the day, so on 19 August 1941, they were reduced, to a maximum range of 10,000 mi (16,000 km), an effective combat radius of 4,000 mi (6,400 km) with a 10,000 lb (4,500 kg) bomb-load, a cruising speed between 240 and 300 mph (390 and 480 km/h), and a service ceiling of 40,000 ft (12,000 m) The ceiling in both cases was chosen to exceed the maximum effective altitude of most of Nazi Germany's anti-aircraft guns.
World War II and after
In the Pacific, the USAAF needed a bomber capable of reaching Japan from bases in Hawaii, and the development of the B-36 became a priority. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, in discussions with high-ranking officers of the USAAF, decided to waive normal army procurement procedures. On 23 July 1943, 15 months after the Germans' Amerikabomber proposals, and the same day that the German firm Heinkel began design on a six-engined bomber of their own, the USAAF submitted a "letter of intent" to Convair for an initial production run of 100, even before testing of the two prototypes was complete. The first delivery was due in August 1945, and the last in October 1946, but Consolidated (by now renamed Convair after merging with Vultee Aircraft) delayed delivery. Three months after V-E Day the aircraft was unveiled on 20 August 1945, and flew for the first time on 8 August 1946.
After the start of the Cold War with the 1948 Berlin Airlift, and the 1949 atmospheric test of the first Soviet atomic bomb, American military planners sought bombers capable of delivering the very large and heavy first-generation atomic bombs.
The B-36 was the only American aircraft with the range and payload to carry such bombs from airfields on American soil to targets in the USSR. The modification to allow the use of larger atomic weapons on the B-36 was called the "Grand Slam Installation".
The B-36 was obsolete from the outset, while it now faced the widespread introduction of opposing jet fighters. The Boeing B-47 Stratojet, its jet engined counterpart, did not become fully operational until 1953, and lacked the range to attack the Soviet Union from North America without aerial refueling and could not carry the huge Mark 16 hydrogen bomb.
The other American piston bombers of the day, the Boeing B-29 Superfortress and Boeing B-50 Superfortress, were also too limited in range. Intercontinental ballistic missiles did not become sufficiently reliable until the early 1960s. Until the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress became operational in 1955, the B-36 was the primary nuclear weapons delivery vehicle of the SAC.
Convair touted the B-36 as the "aluminum overcast", a so-called "long rifle", giving SAC truly global reach. During General Curtis LeMay's tenure as head of SAC (1949–57), the B-36 formed the heart of the Strategic Air Command. Its maximum payload was more than four times that of the B-29 and exceeded that of the later B-52.
The B-36 was slow and could not refuel in midair, but could fly missions to targets 3,400 mi (5,500 km) away and stay aloft as long as 40 hours. Moreover, the B-36 was believed to have "an ace up its sleeve": a phenomenal cruising altitude for a piston-driven aircraft, made possible by its huge wing area and six engines, putting it out of range of most interceptors, as well as ground-based anti-aircraft guns.
Experimentals and prototypes
Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corporation (later Convair) and Boeing Aircraft Company took part in the competition, with Consolidated winning a tender on 16 October 1941. Consolidated asked for a $15 million contract with $800,000 for research and development, mockup, and tooling. Two experimental bombers were proposed, the first to be delivered in 30 months, and the second within 36 months. Originally designated Model B-35, the name was changed to B-36 to avoid confusion with the Northrop YB-35 piston-engined flying-wing bomber, against which the B-36 was meant to compete for a production contract.
Throughout its development, the B-36 program encountered delays. When the United States entered World War II, Consolidated was ordered to slow B-36 development to greatly increase Consolidated B-24 Liberator production. The first mockup was inspected on 20 July 1942, following six months of refinements. A month after the inspection, the project was moved from San Diego, California, to Fort Worth, Texas, which set back development several months. Consolidated changed the tail from a twin-tail to a single, thereby saving 3,850 lb (1,750 kg), but this change delayed delivery by a further 120 days.
Changes in the USAAF requirements added back the weight saved in redesigns, and cost more time. A new antenna system needed to be designed to accommodate a new radio and radar system and the Pratt and Whitney engines were redesigned, adding another 1,000 lb (450 kg).
Design
The B-36 was two-thirds longer than the previous "superbomber", the B-29 and its wingspan and height exceeded those of the Soviet Union's 1960s Antonov An-22, the largest turboprop aircraft ever produced. Only with the advent of the Boeing 747 and the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy, both designed two decades later, did aircraft capable of lifting a heavier payload enter service.
The wings of the B-36 were large even when compared with present-day aircraft, exceeding, for example, those of the C-5 Galaxy, and enabled the B-36 to carry enough fuel to fly the intended long missions without refueling. The maximum thickness of the wing, measured perpendicular to the chord, was 7.5 ft (2.3 m), containing a crawlspace that allowed access to the engines. The wing area permitted cruising altitudes well above the operating ceiling of any 1940s-era fighters, at over 40,000 ft (12,000 m). In 1954, the turrets and other nonessential equipment were stripped out (not unlike the earlier Silverplate program for the atomic bomb-carrying "specialist" B-29s), resulting in a "featherweight" configuration that increased top speed to 423 mph (681 km/h), and cruise at 50,000 ft (15,000 m) and dash at over 55,000 ft (17,000 m), perhaps even higher.
The large wing area, with the four jet engines supplementing the piston engines in later versions gave the B-36 a wide margin between stall speed (VS) and maximum speed (Vmax) at these altitudes. This made the B-36 more maneuverable at high altitude than most jet interceptors of the day, which could not maneuver effectively above 40,000 ft (12,000 m). However, the U.S. Navy McDonnell F2H Banshee fighter could intercept the B-36, thanks to its ability to operate at more than 50,000 ft (15,000 m). Later, the new Secretary of Defense, Louis A. Johnson, who considered the U.S. Navy and naval aviation essentially obsolete in favor of the USAF and SAC, forbade putting the Navy's claim to the test.
The propulsion system of the B-36 was unique, with six 28-cylinder Pratt & Whitney R-4360 Wasp Major radial engines mounted in an unusual pusher configuration, rather than the conventional tractor propeller layout of other heavy bombers. The prototype's six R-4360s delivered 18,000 hp (13,000 kW) which resulted in early B-36s needing long takeoff runs, which was ameliorated when power was boosted to 22,800 hp (17,000 kW). Each engine drove a three-bladed propeller, 19 ft (5.8 m) in diameter, mounted in a pusher configuration. This unusual configuration prevented propeller turbulence from interfering with airflow over the wing, but led to engine overheating due to insufficient airflow around the engines, resulting in inflight engine fires. The large, slow-turning propellers interacted with the high-pressure airflow behind the wings to produce an easily recognizable very-low-frequency pulse at ground level that betrayed approaching flights.
Addition of jet propulsion
Beginning with the B-36D, Convair added a pair of General Electric J47-19 jet engines suspended near the end of each wing which were also retrofitted to surviving B-36Bs. Consequently, the B-36 was configured to have 10 engines, six radial propeller engines and four jet engines, leading to the B-36 slogan of "six turnin' and four burnin'". The B-36 had more engines than any other mass-produced aircraft. The jet pods greatly improved takeoff performance and dash speed over the target. In normal cruising flight, the jet engines were shut down to conserve fuel. When the jet engines were shut down, louvers closed off the front of the pods to reduce drag. The two pods with four turbojets and the six piston engines combined gave the B-36 a total of 40,000 hp (30,000 kW) for short periods of time.
Crew
The B-36 had a crew of 15. As with the B-29 and B-50, the pressurized flight deck and crew compartment were linked to the rear compartment by a pressurized tunnel through the bomb bay. In the B-36, movement through the tunnel was on a wheeled trolley, pulling on a rope. The rear compartment featured six bunks and a dining galley and led to the tail turret.
Landing gear
The main landing gear evolved from a single-wheel design (top) to a 4-wheel bogie (bottom), but a tracked assembly (center) was also tested.The tricycle landing gear of the XB-36 featured a single-wheel main landing gear whose tires were the largest ever manufactured up to that time: 9 ft 2 in (2.79 m) tall, 3 ft (0.91 m) wide, and weighing 1,320 lb (600 kg), with enough rubber for 60 automobile tires. These tires placed so much ground pressure on runways that the XB-36 was restricted to Carswell Field adjacent to the factory in Texas, Eglin Field in Florida, and Fairfield-Suisun Field in California. The single-wheel gear was soon replaced by a four-wheeled bogie. At one point, a tank-like tracked landing gear was also tried on the XB-36, but it proved heavy and noisy and was soon abandoned.
Weaponry
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Convair B-36 Peacemaker" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The four bomb bays could carry up to 87,200 lb (39,600 kg) of bombs, more than 10 times the load carried by the World War II Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress. The B-36 was not designed with nuclear weapons in mind, because the existence of such weapons was top secret during the period when the B-36 was conceived and designed, and the initial B-36A was not capable of accommodating them. Nevertheless, the B-36 stepped into its nuclear delivery role immediately upon becoming operational. In all respects except speed, the B-36 could match what was arguably its approximate Soviet counterpart, the later Tu-95. Until the B-52 became operational, the B-36 was the only means of delivering the first generation Mark 17 hydrogen bomb, 25 ft (7.6 m) long, 5 ft (1.5 m) in diameter, and weighing 42,000 lb (19,000 kg), the heaviest and bulkiest American aerial nuclear bomb. The Mark 17 took up the aircraft's two aft bomb bays, while the forward bay could hold a Mark 6 atomic weapon.
The defensive armament consisted of six retractable gun turrets, with side-by-side turrets mounted in forward dorsal, aft dorsal and ventral positions, aft dorsal and non-retractable tail and nose turrets. Each turret was fitted with two 20 mm (0.79 in) cannon, for a total of 16, and all turrets were remote controlled. Recoil vibration from gunnery practice often caused the aircraft's electrical wiring to jar loose or the vacuum tube electronics to malfunction, leading to failure of the aircraft controls and navigation equipment, which contributed to the crash of B-36B 44-92035 on 22 November 1950.
The Convair B-36 was the only aircraft capable of carrying the T-12 Cloudmaker, a gravity bomb weighing 43,600 lb (19,800 kg) and designed to produce an earthquake bomb effect. Part of the testing process involved dropping two of them in a single flight, one from 30,000 ft (9,100 m) and the second from 40,000 ft (12,000 m).
The first prototype XB-36 flew on 8 August 1946. The speed and range of the prototype failed to meet the standards set out by the USAAC in 1941. This was expected, as the Pratt & Whitney R-4360 engines required were not yet available.
A second aircraft, the YB-36, flew on 4 December 1947. It had a redesigned, high-visibility, yet still heavily framed greenhouse dome-shaped canopy, which was later adopted for production, and the engines used on the YB-36 were more powerful and more efficient. Altogether, the YB-36 was much closer to the production aircraft.
The first 21 B-36As were delivered in 1948 as interim airframes intended for crew training. No defensive armament was fitted, since none was ready. All surviving B-36As were converted to RB-36E reconnaissance models once later models became available. Deliveries began in November 1948 of the combat-capable B-36B, which finally met the 1941 requirements, but had serious engine reliability and maintenance problems (changing the 336 spark plugs was a task dreaded by ground crews) and with the availability of weapons and spares. Later models had more powerful R-4360 engines, improved radar, and redesigned crew compartments.
The jet engines increased fuel consumption and reduced range. Gun turrets were already recognized as obsolete, and newer bombers had only a tail turret, or no gunners at all for several years but the development of air-to-air missiles, such as the Soviet K-5 which began test firings in 1951, eliminated remaining justifications for keeping them. In February 1954, the USAF awarded Convair a contract for a new "Featherweight" program, which significantly reduced weight and crew size. The three configurations were:
- Featherweight I removed defensive hardware, including the six gun turrets.
- Featherweight II removed the rear compartment crew comfort features, and all hardware accommodating the McDonnell XF-85 Goblin parasite fighter.
- Featherweight III incorporated both configurations I and II.
The six turrets eliminated by Featherweight I reduced the crew from 15 to 9. Featherweight III had a longer range and an operating ceiling of at least 47,000 ft (14,000 m), especially valuable for reconnaissance missions. The B-36J-III configuration (the last 14 made) had a single radar-aimed tail turret, extra fuel tanks in the outer wings, and landing gear allowing the maximum gross weight to be increased to 410,000 lb (190,000 kg).
Production of the B-36 ceased in 1954.
Operating and financial problems
Due to problems that occurred with the B-36 in its early stages of testing, development, and later in service, some critics referred to the aircraft as a "billion-dollar blunder". In particular, the United States Navy saw it as a costly bungle, diverting congressional funding and interest from naval aviation and aircraft carriers in general, and carrier–based nuclear bombers in particular. In 1947, the Navy attacked congressional funding for the B-36, alleging it failed to meet Pentagon requirements. The Navy held to the pre-eminence of the aircraft carrier in the Pacific during World War II, presuming carrier-based aircraft would be decisive in future wars. To this end, the Navy designed USS United States, a "supercarrier" capable of launching huge fleets of tactical aircraft or nuclear bombers. It then pushed to have funding transferred from the B-36 to USS United States. The Air Force successfully defended the B-36 project, and United States was cancelled by Secretary of Defense Louis A. Johnson in a cost-cutting move over the objections of both Secretary of the Navy John L. Sullivan and the Navy's senior leadership. Sullivan resigned in protest and was replaced as Secretary of the Navy by Francis P. Matthews, who had limited familiarity with defense issues, but was a close friend of Johnson. Several high-level Navy officials questioned the government's decision in cancelling the United States to fund the B-36, alleging a conflict of interest because Johnson had once served on Convair's board of directors. The uproar following the cancellation of United States in 1949 was nicknamed the "Revolt of the Admirals", during which time Matthews dismissed and forced into retirement the serving Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), Admiral Louis E. Denfeld, following Denfeld's testimony before the House Armed Services Committee.
The congressional and media furor over the firing of Admiral Denfeld, as well as the significant use of aircraft carriers in the Korean War, resulted in the Truman administration subsequently ousting both Johnson and Matthews, and procuring Forrestal-class supercarriers, which were similar in size to United States, but geared towards multirole use with air wings of fighter, attack, reconnaissance, electronic warfare, early warning and antisubmarine-warfare aircraft. Simultaneously, heavy manned bombers for SAC were also deemed crucial to national defense and the two systems would never again be in competition for funding.
Operational history
The B-36, including its GRB-36, RB-36, and XC-99 variants, was in USAF service as part of the SAC from 1948 to 1959. The RB-36 variants of the B-36 were used for reconnaissance during the Cold War with the Soviet Union and the B-36 bomber variants conducted training and test operations and stood ground and airborne alert, but were never flown offensively as bombers against hostile forces.
Maintenance
The Wasp Major engines had a prodigious appetite for lubricating oil and each engine required a dedicated 100 US gal (380 L) tank. Normal maintenance consisted of tedious measures, such as changing the 56 spark plugs on each of the six engines which were often fouled by the lead in the 145 octane antiknock fuel required. Thus, each service required changing 336 spark plugs. The B-36 was too large to fit in most hangars. Since even an aircraft with the range of the B-36 needed to be stationed as close to enemy targets as possible, this meant the plane was largely based in the extreme weather locations of the northern continental United States, Alaska, and the Arctic. Since the maintenance had to be performed outdoors, the crews were largely exposed to the elements, with temperatures of −60 °F (−51 °C) in winters and 100 °F (38 °C) in summers, depending on the location. Special shelters were built to provide the maintenance crews a modicum of protection. Ground crews were at risk of slipping and falling from icy wings. The wing roots were thick enough, at 7 ft (2.1 m), to enable a flight engineer to access the backs of the engines and the landing gear during flight by crawling through the wings but was only possible at lower altitudes.
In 1950, Consolidated-Vultee developed streamlined pods that looked like large drop tanks that mounted on each side of the fuselage to carry spare engines between bases. Each pod could airlift two engines. When the pods were empty, they were removed and carried in the bomb bays. No record exists of the pods being used.
Engine fires
As engine fires occurred with the B-36's radial engines, some crews humorously changed the aircraft's slogan from "six turning, four burning" into "two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking and two more unaccounted for". This problem was exacerbated by the propellers' pusher configuration, which increased carburetor icing. The design of the R-4360 engine tacitly assumed that it would be mounted in the conventional tractor configuration with the air flowing in the order of propeller/air intake/cylinders and to the carburetor. In this configuration, the carburetor is bathed in warm air flowing past the engine, so is unlikely to ice up. However, they were mounted backwards in the B-36 and the carburetor was in front of the engine, where it would not benefit from engine heat and made more existing carburetor heat systems unsuitable. Hence, when intake air was cold and humid, ice gradually obstructed the carburetor intake, which increased the air/fuel mixture richness until unburned fuel in the exhaust caught fire. Three engine fires of this nature led to the first loss of an American nuclear weapon when a B-36 crashed in February 1950.
Crew experience
Training missions were typically in two parts, a 40-hour flight—followed by time on the ground for refueling and maintenance—and then a 24-hour second flight. With a sufficiently light load, the B-36 could fly at least 10,000 mi (16,000 km) nonstop, and the highest cruising speed of any version, the B-36J-III, was at 230 mph (370 km/h). Engaging the jet engines could raise the cruising speed to over 400 mph (640 km/h). Hence, a 40-hour mission, with the jets used only for takeoff and climbing, flew about 9,200 mi (14,800 km).
Due to its size, the B-36 was never sprightly or agile. Lieutenant General James Edmundson likened it to "sitting on your front porch and flying your house around". Crew compartments were nonetheless cramped, especially when occupied for 24 hours by a crew of 15.
War missions would have been one-way, taking off from forward bases in Alaska or Greenland, overflying the USSR, and landing in Europe, Morocco, or the Middle East. Veteran crews recall feeling confident in their ability to fly the missions, but not to survive weapon delivery, as the aircraft were not fast enough to escape the blast. These concerns were confirmed by the 1954 Operation Castle tests, in which B-36s were flown at combat distances from detonations of bombs in the 15-megaton range. At distances typical of wartime delivery, aircraft suffered extensive flash and blast damage.
Experiments
The B-36 was employed in a variety of aeronautical experiments throughout its service life. Its immense size, range, and payload capacity lent itself to use in research and development programs. These included nuclear propulsion studies, and "parasite" programs in which the B-36 carried smaller interceptors or reconnaissance aircraft.
In May 1946, the Air Force began the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft project, which was followed in May 1951 by the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program. The ANP program used modified B-36s to study shielding requirements for an airborne reactor to determine whether a nuclear-powered aircraft was feasible. Convair modified two B-36s under the MX-1589 project. The Nuclear Test Aircraft was a B-36H-20-CF (serial number 51-5712) that had been damaged in a tornado at Carswell AFB on 1 September 1952. This aircraft, redesignated the XB-36H (and later NB-36H), was modified to carry a 1 MW, air-cooled nuclear reactor in the aft bomb bay, with a four-ton lead disc shield installed in the middle of the aircraft between the reactor and the cockpit. A number of large air intake and exhaust holes were installed in the sides and bottom of the aircraft's rear fuselage to cool the reactor in flight. On the ground, a crane would be used to remove the 35,000 lb (16,000 kg) reactor from the aircraft. To protect the crew, the highly modified cockpit was encased in lead and rubber, with a 1 ft-thick (30 cm) leaded glass windshield. The reactor was operational, but did not power the aircraft as its purpose was to investigate the effect of radiation. Between 1955 and 1957, the NB-36H completed 47 test flights and 215 hours of flight time, during 89 of which the reactor was critical.
Other experiments involved providing the B-36 with its own fighter defense in the form of parasite aircraft carried partially or wholly in a bomb bay. One parasite aircraft was the diminutive football-shaped McDonnell XF-85 Goblin, which docked using a trapeze. The concept was tested using a B-29 carrier, but docking was difficult even for experienced test pilots. Moreover, the XF-85 was no match for contemporary foreign powers' interceptors in development or in service and consequently the project was cancelled.
The FICON project was more successful and involving a modified B-36 (a GRB-36D "mothership") and the RF-84K, a fighter modified for reconnaissance, in a bomb bay. The GRB-36D would ferry the RF-84K to the vicinity of the objective, whereupon the RF-84K would disconnect and begin its mission. Ten GRB-36Ds and 25 RF-84Ks were built and had limited service in 1955–1956.
Projects Tip Tow and Tom-Tom involved docking F-84s to the wingtips of B-29s and B-36s. The hope was that the increased aspect ratio of the combined aircraft would result in a greater range. Project Tip Tow was cancelled when an EF-84D and a specially modified test EB-29A crashed, killing everyone on both aircraft. This accident was attributed to the EF-84D flipping over onto the wing of the EB-29A. Project Tom-Tom, involving RF-84Fs and a GRB-36D from the FICON project (redesignated JRB-36F), continued for a few months after this crash, but was also cancelled due to the violent turbulence induced by the wingtip vortices of the B-36.
Strategic reconnaissance
One of the SAC's initial missions was to plan strategic aerial reconnaissance on a global scale. The first efforts were in photo-reconnaissance and mapping. Along with the photo-reconnaissance mission, a small electronic intelligence cadre operated. Weather reconnaissance was part of the effort, as was long-range detection of Soviet atomic explosions. In the late 1940s, strategic intelligence on Soviet capabilities and intentions was scarce. Before the development of the Lockheed U-2 high-altitude spy plane and Corona orbital reconnaissance satellites, technology and politics limited American reconnaissance efforts to the borders, of the Soviet Union.
One of the essential criteria of the early postwar reconnaissance aircraft was the ability to cruise above 40,000 ft (12,000 m), a level partly determined by knowledge of the capability of Soviet air-defense radar. The main Soviet air-defense radar in the 1950s was the American-supplied SCR-270, or locally made copies, which were only effective up to 40,000 ft (12,000 m) – in theory, and an aircraft cruising above this level likely would remain undetected.
The first aircraft to put this theory to the test was the RB-36D specialized photo-reconnaissance version of the B-36D. It was outwardly identical to the standard B-36D, but carried a crew of 22 rather than 15, the additional crew members being needed to operate the reconnaissance equipment carried. The forward bomb bay was filled with a pressurized, manned compartment with 14 cameras and a darkroom, where a photo technician would develop the film. The second bomb bay contained up to 80 T-86 photoflash bombs, while the third bay could carry an extra 11,000 L (3,000 US gal) droppable fuel tank. The fourth bomb bay carried electronic countermeasure equipment. The full defensive armament was retained. The extra fuel tanks increased the flight endurance to up to 50 hours and it had an operational ceiling of 50,000 ft (15,000 m). Later, a lightweight version of this aircraft, the RB-36-III, could reach 58,000 ft (18,000 m). RB-36s were distinguished by the bright aluminum finish of the camera compartment (contrasting with the dull magnesium of the rest of the fuselage) and by a series of radar domes under the aft fuselage, varying in number and placement. When developed, it was the only American aircraft large enough to carry the bulky, high-resolution cameras of the day.
The standard RB-36D carried up to 23 cameras, primarily K-17C, K-22A, K-38, and K-40 cameras. A special 240 in (6,100 mm) focal length camera (known as the Boston Camera after the university where it was designed) was tested on 44-92088, the aircraft being redesignated ERB-36D. The long focal length was achieved by using a two-mirror reflection system and could resolve a golf ball from 45,000 ft (14,000 m) and up to 63,600 ft (19,400 m) away.
The first RB-36D (44-92088) made its initial flight on 18 December 1949, six months after the B-36D, but initially flew without turbojets. The 28th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing based at Rapid City AFB (later renamed Ellsworth AFB), South Dakota, received its first RB-36D on 3 June 1950 but due to severe material shortages, they were not operational until June 1951. The 24th and last RB-36D was delivered in May 1951. Some RB-36Ds were later modified to the featherweight configuration, in which all but the tail guns were removed and the crew reduced from 22 to 19. These aircraft were redesignated as RB-36D-III. Modifications were carried out by Convair from February to November 1954.
With a range of 9,300 mi (15,000 km), RB-36Ds began probing the Arctic boundaries of the Soviet Union in 1951. Although on-board equipment indicated detection by Soviet radar, interceptions at the B-36's service ceiling remained difficult. RB-36 aircraft operating from RAF Sculthorpe in England made a number of overflights of Soviet Arctic bases, particularly the new nuclear weapons test complex at Novaya Zemlya. RB-36s performed a number of rarely acknowledged reconnaissance missions and are believed to have frequently penetrated Chinese (and Soviet) airspace under the direction of General Curtis LeMay.
In early 1950, Convair began converting B-36As for reconnaissance, including the sole YB-36, which were all redesignated RB-36E. The R-4360-25 engines were replaced by R-4360-41s and were fitted with four J-47 jet engines as on the RB-36D. Its normal crew was 22, which included five gunners. The last conversion was completed in July 1951. The USAF later bought 73 long-range reconnaissance versions of the B-36H under the designation RB-36H. Of these, 23 were accepted during the first six months of 1952, and the last were delivered by September 1953. More than a third of all B-36s were reconnaissance models.
Advances in Soviet air defense systems limited the RB-36 to flying outside the Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe. In the mid-1950s, the jet-powered Boeing RB-47E continued to penetrate Soviet airspace and conducted a variety of spectacular and highly illegal overflights of the Soviet Union, where they took photographic and radar recordings of the routes SAC bombers would follow. Flights that involved penetrating mainland Russia were termed sensitive intelligence (SENSINT) missions.
As with the strategic bombardment versions, the RB-36 was phased out of the SAC inventory beginning in 1956, the last being sent to Davis–Monthan Air Force Base in January 1959.
Obsolescence
With the appearance of the Soviet Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 over North Korea in 1950, USAF propeller-driven bombers were made obsolete as strategic offensive weapons. Both the B-36 and the B-29/B-50 Superfortresses were designed during World War II, prior to the jet age. A new generation of jet bombers, flying higher and faster, was needed to effectively overcome Soviet interceptors. In 1952, while fighting continued during the Korean War, the Convair YB-60, developed from the B-36, entered a design competition against the Boeing YB-52. By early 1953, the Boeing had emerged as the preferred design.
After fighting in Korea had ceased, President Eisenhower called for a "new look" at national defense. His administration retired nearly all of its SAC B-29/B-50s in favour of the new B-47 Stratojet, introduced in 1951. By 1955, the B-52 Stratofortress was entering the inventory in substantial numbers, replacing B-36s.
Two major factors contributing to the obsolescence of the B-36 and its phaseout were a lack of aerial refueling capability and its low speed which made it vulnerable to interceptors and severely decreased its ability to reach Soviet targets.
The scrapping of B-36s began in February 1956. Once replaced by B-52s, they were flown directly from squadrons to Davis–Monthan AFB, Arizona, where the Mar-Pak Corporation handled their reclamation and destruction. Defense cutbacks in FY 1958 stretched out B-52 procurement and B-36 service life had to be extended. B-36s still in service were supported with parts taken from aircraft sent to Davis–Monthan. Further update work was undertaken by Convair at San Diego (Specialized Aircraft Maintenance, SAM-SAC) until 1957 to extend the service life of the B-36s. By December 1958, only 22 were still operational.
On 12 February 1959, the last B-36J built, USAF Serial No. 52-2827, left Biggs AFB, Texas, where it had been on duty with the 95th Heavy Bombardment Wing, and was flown to Amon Carter Field in Fort Worth, where it was put on display. Within two years, all B-36s, except five used for museum display, had been scrapped.
Variants
Main article: Convair B-36 Peacemaker variantsVariant | Built |
---|---|
XB-36 | 1 |
YB-36 | 1 |
B-36A | 22 |
XC-99 | 1 |
B-36B | 62 |
B-36D | 22 |
RB-36D | 24 |
B-36F | 34 |
RB-36F | 24 |
B-36H | 83 |
RB-36H | 73 |
B-36J | 33 |
YB-60 | 2 |
Total | 385 |
- XB-36
- Unarmed prototype powered by six 3,000 hp (2,200 kW) R-4360-25 engines, one built.
- YB-36
- Prototype, s/n 42-13571, with modified nose and raised cockpit roof, one built, later converted to YB-36A.
- YB-36A
- Former YB-36 with modified four-wheel landing gear, later modified as a RB-36E.
- B-36A
- Unarmed interim production variant, used for training, 22 built, all but one converted to RB-36E.
- XC-99
- A cargo/transport version of the B-36. One built.
- B-36B
- Armed production variant with six 3,500 hp (2,600 kW) R-4360-41 engines, 73 built, later conversions to RB-36D and B-36D.
- RB-36B
- Designation for 39 B-36Bs temporarily fitted with a camera installation.
- YB-36C
- Projected variant of the B-36B with six 4,300 hp (3,200 kW) R-4360-51 engines driving tractor propellers, not built.
- B-36C
- Production version of the YB-36, completed as B-36Bs.
- B-36D
- Same as B-36B, but fitted with four J47-GE-19 engines, two each in two underwing pods, 22 built and 64 conversions from B-36B.
- RB-36D
- Strategic reconnaissance variant with two bomb bays fitted with camera installation, 17 built and seven conversions from B-36B.
- GRB-36D
- Same as RB-36D, but modified to carry a GRF-84F Thunderstreak on a ventral trapeze as part of the FICON program, 10 modified.
- RB-36E
- The YB-36A and 21 B-36As converted to RB-36D standards.
- B-36F
- Same as B-36D, but fitted with six 3,800 hp (2,800 kW) R-4360-53 engines and four J47-GE-19 engines, 34 built.
- RB-36F
- Strategic reconnaissance variant of the B-36F with additional fuel capacity, 24 built.
- YB-36G
- See YB-60.
- B-36H
- Same as B-36F with improved cockpit and equipment changes, 83 built.
- NB-36H
- One B-36H fitted with a nuclear reactor installation for trials, had a revised cockpit and raised nose. This was intended to evolve into the Convair X-6.
- RB-36H
- Strategic reconnaissance variant of the B-36H, 73 built.
- B-36J
- High altitude variant with strengthened landing gear, increased fuel capacity, armament reduced to tail guns only and reduced crew, 33 built.
- YB-60
- Originally designated the YB-36G, s/n 49-2676 and 49-2684. Project for a jet-powered swept wing variant. Due to the differences from a standard B-36 its designation was changed to YB-60.
- Model 6
- Proposed double-deck airliner marrying the fuselage of the B-36 with the wings and empennage of the YB-60; not built.
Related models
In 1951, the USAF asked Convair to build an all-jet B-36. Convair replaced a B-36F's wings with swept wings, from which were suspended eight Pratt & Whitney XJ57-P-3 jet engines. The result was the B-36G, later renamed the Convair YB-60. The YB-60 was inferior to Boeing's YB-52, and was terminated. The B-36 was the basis for the Convair XC-99, a double-decked military transport that was the largest piston-engined, land-based transport aircraft built. Its length of 185 ft (56 m) made it the longest practical aircraft of its era. The sole example was used for nearly 10 years, especially for Korean War cross-country cargo flights. In 2005, it was dismantled in anticipation of its being moved from the former Kelly Air Force Base, now the Kelly Field Annex of Lackland AFB in San Antonio, Texas, where it had been stored since 1957. The XC-99 was then relocated to the National Museum of the United States Air Force at Wright-Patterson AFB for restoration, with C-5 Galaxy transports carrying XC-99 pieces there.
A commercial airliner derived from the XC-99, the Convair Model 37, never left the drawing board.
Operators
United States Air Force – Strategic Air Command
2d Air Force
- 72d Strategic Reconnaissance Wing – Ramey AFB, Puerto Rico (October 1952 – January 1959)
- 60th and 301st Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Square F
- 6th Bombardment Wing – Walker AFB, New Mexico (August 1952 – August 1957)
- 24th, 39th and 40th Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Triangle R
- 7th Bombardment Wing – Carswell AFB, Texas (June 1948 – May 1958)
- 9th, 436th and 492d Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Triangle J
- 11th Bombardment Wing – Carswell AFB, Texas (December 1948 – December 1957)
- 26th, 42d and 98th Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Triangle U
- 28th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing – Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota (May 1949 – April 1950)
- 77th, 717th and 718th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle X
- 42d Bombardment Wing, Loring AFB, Maine (April 1953 – September 1956)
- 69th, 70th and 75th Bombardment Squadrons
- 92d Bombardment Wing – Fairchild AFB, Washington (July 1951 – March 1956)
- 325th, 326th and 327th Bombardment Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle W
- 95th Bombardment Wing – Biggs AFB, Texas (August 1953 – February 1959)
- 334th, 335th and 336th Bombardment Squadrons
- 5th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing – Fairfield-Suisun AFB (later Travis AFB), California (January 1951 – September 1958)
- 5th, 31st and 72d Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle X
- 9th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing – Fairfield-Suisun AFB, California (May 1949 – April 1950)
- 1st Bombardment Squadron
- 99th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing – Fairchild AFB, Washington (August 1951 – September 1956)
- 346th, 347th and 348th Strategic Reconnaissance Squadrons, Tail Code: Circle I
Note: SAC eliminated tail codes in 1953.
Surviving aircraft
As of 2022 four complete B-36 type aircraft survive from the original 384 produced.
- RB-36H
- AF Ser. No. 51-13730 is at Castle Air Museum at the former Castle Air Force Base in Atwater, California. Previously displayed at the former Chanute Air Force Base in Rantoul, Illinois from 1957 to 1991.
- B-36J
- AF Ser. No. 52-2217 is at the Strategic Air Command and Aerospace Museum, formerly located at Offutt Air Force Base, and now off-base near Ashland, Nebraska.
- AF Ser. No. 52-2220 is at the National Museum of the United States Air Force at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Its flight to the museum from Davis–Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona on 30 April 1959 was the last flight of a B-36. This B-36J replaced the former Air Force Museum's original YB-36. This was the first aircraft placed in the museum's new display hangar. It is displayed alongside the massive 9 ft (2.7 m) lower main gear strut, single wheel and tire from the XB-36.
- AF Ser. No. 52-2827 is at the Pima Air and Space Museum, adjacent to Davis–Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona. This aircraft was the final B-36 built, named The City of Fort Worth, and lent to the city of Fort Worth on 12 February 1959. It sat on the field at the Greater Southwest International Airport until that airfield was closed and the property was redeveloped adjacent to Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. Some attempts were made to begin restoration at that location through the early 1970s. It then moved to the short-lived Southwest Aerospace Museum, between the former Carswell Air Force Base (now Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth) and the former General Dynamics (now Lockheed Martin) assembly plant, where it was originally built. Some restoration took place there. As Lockheed Martin had no room to display it, and efforts in Fort Worth to build a facility fell short, the NMUSAF repossessed the aircraft and it was transported to Tucson for loan to the Pima Air and Space Museum. It was fully restored and reassembled at that museum, just south of Davis–Monthan AFB, and is displayed there.
Notable incidents and accidents
Though the B-36 had a good overall safety record, well above average for the class and time, 10 B-36s were involved in accidents between 1949 and 1954 (three B-36Bs, three B-36Ds, and four B-36Hs). A total of 32 B-36s were written off in accidents between 1949 and 1957 of 385 built. When a crash occurred, the magnesium-rich airframe burned easily.
On 14 February 1950 off the northwest coast of British Columbia on Princess Royal Island, 17 crew parachuted from their blazing B-36B; 12 crewmen were found with one injured, and five were missing.
On Labor Day, Monday, 1 September 1952, a tornado hit Carswell Air Force Base, Fort Worth, damaging aircraft of the 7th and 11th Bomber Wings' complement of B-36s. Some two-thirds of the USAF's entire B-36 fleet was damaged, as well as six aircraft being built at that point at Convair's Fort Worth plant. The base was shut down and operations transferred to Meacham Field. Joint repairs by Convair and the USAF had repaired 18 of the 19 heavily damaged aircraft (and the six damaged and unfinished aircraft at Convair) by May 1953. One example was to be scrapped, but was used as a nuclear testing site ground target. Another heavily damaged aircraft was rebuilt as the NB-36H Nuclear Reactor Testbed aircraft.
On February 2, 1953 Convair B-36H Serial No 51-5729 crashed 16 miles southwest of CFB Goose Bay, Labrador, following a transatlantic flight from RAF Fairford. The aircraft crashed in hilly wooded terrain. The investigation determined that a Ground-controlled approach failure was at fault. Two of the 17 crew perished.
On the night of 17 March 1953 RB-36H-25, 51-13721 departed the Canary Islands to test North American air defenses. Change in weather conditions drove the aircraft off course, and early in the morning on 18 March the aircraft collided with a mountain on the west side of Trinity Bay (48°11′04″N 53°39′51″W / 48.184352°N 53.664271°W / 48.184352; -53.664271 (RB-36H-25)) just north of Burgoyne's Cove, Newfoundland, Canada. All 23 crew, including Brigadier General Richard Ellsworth, were killed.
B-36s were involved in two "Broken Arrow" incidents. On 13 February 1950, B-36 serial number 44-92075, crashed in an unpopulated region of British Columbia, resulting in the first loss of an American atom bomb. The inert bomb's plutonium core had been replaced with lead, but it did have TNT, and it detonated over the ocean before the crew bailed out. Locating the crash site took some effort. On 4 November 2016, however, an object similar to the bomb was reported to have been located by a diver near the Haida Gwaii archipelago , 50 mi (80 km) off the coast of British Columbia. The Royal Canadian Navy deployed vessels to investigate. After investigation, the Royal Canadian Navy determined that it was not the lost bomb. Later in 1954, the airframe, stripped of sensitive material, was substantially destroyed in situ by a U.S. military recovery team.
On 22 May 1957, a B-36 accidentally dropped a Mark 17 thermonuclear bomb 4.5 mi (7.2 km) away from the control tower while landing at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The weapon had come loose from its mounts and fell through the bomb bay doors, and sending the aircraft into an uncontrollable climb due to the sudden and unexpected weight shift. Only the conventional explosives detonated, as the bomb was unarmed. The aircraft made a safe landing. These incidents remained classified for decades. See list of military nuclear accidents.
Specifications (B-36J-III)
Data from National Museum of the U.S. Air Force
General characteristics
- Crew: 13
- Length: 162 ft 1 in (49.40 m)
- Wingspan: 230 ft 0 in (70.10 m)
- Height: 46 ft 9 in (14.25 m)
- Wing area: 4,772 sq ft (443.3 m)
- Airfoil: root: NACA 63(420)-422; tip: NACA 63(420)-517
- Empty weight: 166,165 lb (75,371 kg)
- Max takeoff weight: 410,000 lb (185,973 kg)
- Powerplant: 6 × Pratt & Whitney R-4360-53 Wasp Major 28-cylinder 4-row air-cooled radial piston engines, 3,800 hp (2,800 kW) each for take-off
- Powerplant: 4 × General Electric J47 turbojet engines, 5,200 lbf (23 kN) thrust each in pylon mounted pods outboard of piston engines
- Propellers: 3-bladed Curtiss Electric constant-speed fully-feathering pusher propellers
Performance
- Maximum speed: 435 mph (700 km/h, 378 kn)
- Cruise speed: 230 mph (370 km/h, 200 kn)
- Combat range: 3,985 mi (6,413 km, 3,463 nmi)
- Ferry range: 10,000 mi (16,000 km, 8,700 nmi)
- Service ceiling: 43,600 ft (13,300 m)
- Rate of climb: 1,995 ft/min (10.13 m/s)
Armament
- Guns: 1 remotely operated tail turret with 2 × 20 mm (0.787 in) M24A1 autocannon
- Bombs: 86,000 lb (39,000 kg) with weight restrictions, 72,000 lb (33,000 kg) normal
Notable appearances in media
Main article: Aircraft in fiction § B-36 PeacemakerIn 1949, the B-36 was featured in the documentary film, Target: Peace, about the operations of the 7th Bombardment Wing at Carswell AFB. Other scenes included B-36 production at the Fort Worth plant.
Strategic Air Command is a 1955 American film starring James Stewart as a Major League Baseball star and World War II veteran who is called back to active duty to become a B-36 pilot and flight commander for SAC.
The documentary Lost Nuke (2004) chronicles a 2003 Canadian expedition to find the first lost nuclear weapon which traveled to the mountain site of the 1950 British Columbia B-36 crash.
See also
- B-36 Peacemaker Museum
- Convair B-36 variants
- Lycoming XR-7755
- Revolt of the Admirals
- "Victory Bomber"
- Kégresse track
Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
Related lists
References
Notes
- Convair proposed the name "Peacemaker" in a submission to a contest to name the bomber. Although the name "Peacemaker" was not officially adopted, it was commonly used and sources often state or imply the name is "official".
- Quote attributed to Captain Banda when he was escorting Air Cadet Michael R. Daciek, later Lieutenant Colonel Daciek, on an inside tour of the XC-99 in 1953.
Citations
- "Peacemaker Name Certificate." Archived 26 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine 7th Bomb Wing B-36 Association. Retrieved: 28 August 2010.
- ^ "Convair B-36J Peacemaker". National Museum of the United States Air Force. 28 May 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2018..
- ^ Taylor, John W.R. (1969). Combat Aircraft of the World from 1909 to the present. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. p. 465. ISBN 0-425-03633-2.
- ^ Johnsen, Frederick A. (1978). Thundering Peacemaker: the B-36 Story in Words and Pictures. Tacoma, Washington: Bomber Books. p. 1.
- Jacobsen, Meyers K.; Wagner, Ray (1980). B-36 in action. Aircraft in Action. Vol. 42. Carrollton, Tex.: Squadron/Signal Publications. p. 4. ISBN 0897471016.
- Winchester, Jim (2006). "Convair B-36". Military aircraft of the Cold War. The Aviation Factfile. Rochester, Kent, UK: The Grange plc. p. 49. ISBN 1-84013-929-3.
- Griehl, Manfred; Dressel, Joachim (1998). Heinkel He 177 – 277 – 274. Shrewsbury, UK: Airlife Publishing. p. 197. ISBN 1-85310-364-0.
- ^ Knaack, Marcelle Size (1988). Encyclopedia of U.S. Air Force aircraft and missile systems (PDF) (Technical report). Vol. II Post World War II Bombers. Office of Air Force History. ISBN 0912799595. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2023 – via media.defense.gov.
- "Video: Biggest Bomber, 1946/08/15." Universal Newsreel, 1946. Retrieved: 20 February 2012.
- Wagner, Ray (1968). American Combat Planes. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc. p. 142. ISBN 0-385-04134-9.
- ^ Yenne, Bill (2004). "Convair B-36 Peacemaker". International Air Power Review. Vol. 13. Norwalk, CT: AIRtime Publishing, Inc. ISBN 1-880588-84-6.
- ^ Leach, Norman S. (2008). Broken Arrow: America's First Lost Nuclear Weapon. Calgary: Red Deer Press. ISBN 978-0889953482.
- Griswold, Wesley P. "Remember the B-36." Popular Science, September 1961.
- "National Museum of the USAF – Bomber". Archived from the original on 8 November 2014. Retrieved 12 November 2014.
- Jacobsen, Meyers K. (November 1974). "Peacemaker". Airpower. Vol. 4, no. 6. p. 54.
- ^ Jacobsen, Meyers K. (1997). Convair B-36: A Comprehensive History of America's 'Big Stick'. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Military History. ISBN 0764305301.
- AU/ACSC/166/1998-04 "Standard Aircraft Characteristics: F2H-2 Banshee." Archived 6 December 2006 at the Wayback Machine history.naval.mil. Retrieved: 28 August 2010.
- "The Revolt of the Admirals." Air Command and Staff College Air University. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "Doors Shield Jets From Blowing Dirt" Popular Mechanics, October 1950, p. 117.
- "B-36 Adds Four Jet Engines." Popular Mechanics, July 1949, p. 124.
- Shiel, Walter P. (1996). The B-36 Peacemaker: 'There Aren't Programs Like This Anymore' (PDF) (Technical report). p. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 June 2004.
- ^ Jenkins, Dennis R. (2002). Magnesium Overcast: The Story of the Convair B-36. North Branch, Minnesota: Specialty Press. ISBN 978-1-58007-129-1.
- Puryear, Edgar F. (1981). Stars in Flight. Novato, CA: Presidio Press. p. 26. ISBN 0-89141-128-3.
- Schmidt, Robert Kyle (18 February 2021). The Design of Aircraft Landing Gear. SAE International. pp. 8–9. ISBN 978-0-7680-9943-0.
- "It makes the B-36 light on its feet". Flying. August 1950. p. 35.
- "History: Boeing B-17." Archived 7 January 2007 at the Wayback Machine boeing.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- Peacock October 1990, p. 233
- "Russia sparks Cold War scramble." BBC News, 9 August 2007. Retrieved: 30 April 2010.
- Tucker, Spencer C. (26 March 2020). Weapons and Warfare [2 volumes]: From Ancient and Medieval Times to the 21st Century [2 volumes]. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 352. ISBN 978-1-4408-6728-6.
- Page, Joseph (2021). Ellsworth Air Force Base. Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4671-0694-8.
- Peacock October 1990, p. 234
- Lockett, Brian. "Summary of Air Force accident report." Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "The Last B-36 and the people who saved it from destruction." Archived 14 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine cowtown.net, 1 October 2006. Retrieved: 21 September 2007.
- Wolk, Herman S. (2003). Fulcrum of Power: Essays on the United States Air Force and National Security. Darby, PA: Diane Publishing. p. 163. ISBN 1-4289-9008-9.
- ^ Barlow, Jeffrey G. (1994). Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945–1950. Washington, D.C.: Naval Historical Center, Dept. of the Navy. ISBN 0-16-042094-6.
- McFarland, Keith (1980). "The 1949 Revolt of the Admirals" (PDF). Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College Quarterly Vol. XI, No. 2. pp. 53–63. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 28 April 2014.
- "Costly Bomber Gives Way to Jet". Newspapers.com. Evening Vanguard. 25 February 1957. Retrieved 28 January 2024.
- Morris, Ted. "Flying the Aluminum and Magnesium Overcast." zianet.com, 2000. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "Bomber Carries Spare Engines." Popular Mechanics, September 1950, p. 146,
- Daciek, Michael R. "Speaking at random about flying and writing: B-36 Peacemaker/Ten Engine Bomber". YourHub.com, 13 December 2006. Retrieved: 6 April 2009.
- Ricketts, Bruce. "Broken Arrow, A lost nuclear weapon in Canada": Interview with B-36B 44-92075 Co-pilot 1st Lt R. P. Whitfield. mysteriesofcanada.com, 1998. Retrieved: 24 September 2007.
- "Lt. General James Edmundson on: Flying B-36 and B-47 planes" Archived 31 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine. American Experience, PBS, January 1999. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "B-36 Era and Cold War Aviation Forum". delphiforums.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "Operation Castle: Report of Commander, Task Group 7.1, p. 24 (extract version)". Archived 27 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine. worf.eh.doe.gov, 1 February 1980. Retrieved: 23 September 2007.
- Miller, Jay; Cripliver, Roger (1978). "B-36: The Ponderous Peacemaker". Aviation Quarterly. Vol. 4, no. 4. pp. 366, 369.
- Trakimavičius, Lukas. "The Future Role of Nuclear Propulsion in the Military" (PDF). NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- Lockett, Brian. "Parasite Fighter Programs: Project Tom-Tom." Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- Hall, R. Cargill. "The Truth About Overflights: Military Reconnaissance Missions over Russia Before the U-2." Quarterly Journal of Military History, Spring 1997.
- Wack, Fred J. The Secret Explorers: Saga of the 46th/72nd Reconnaissance Squadrons. Self-published, 1990.
- "Convair YB-36 'Peacemaker'." Archived 18 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine AeroWeb. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "Convair YB-36G (YB-60) 'Peacemaker'." Archived 18 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine AeroWeb. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "Convair Model 6 Jet Airliner". 7 August 2012.
- "Tails Through Time: The Convair Model 6: A Jumbo Before Its Time". 21 June 2010.
- "YB-60 Factsheet." Archived 15 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- Hill, 1st Lt Bruce R. Jr. "XC-99 begins piece-by-piece trip to Air Force Museum." Archived 3 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine 433rd Airlift Wing Public Affairs, 22 April 2004.
- "B-36 Deployment." strategic-air-command.com. Retrieved: 14 June 2010.
- "B-36 Peacemaker, s/n 51-13730." Castle Air Museum. Retrieved: 14 December 2017.
- "B-36 Peacemaker, s/n 52-2217." Archived 31 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine SAC Museum. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- "B-36 Peacemaker, s/n 52-2220." National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 14 December 2017.
- "B-36 Peacemaker, s/n 52-2827." Pima Air & Space Museum. Retrieved: 9 April 2012.
- ^ Lockett, Brian. "Convair B-36 Crash Reports and Wreck Sites." Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- Lockett, Brian. "Synopsis of the Air Force Accident Report for RB-36H, 51-13722." Goleta Air and Space Museum, air-and-space.com, 30 July 2003. Retrieved: 23 September 2007.
- "Gen disasters". Archived from the original on 5 July 2020. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
- "B-36 fleet destroyed by tornado." Archived 1 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine cotown.net, 27 August 2007. Retrieved: 4 April 2012.
- "Burgoyne's Cove B-36 Crash Site" Retrieved: 21 Mar 2024.
- Pyeatt, Don. "Interview with copilot." Archived 18 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine cotown.net, 31 August 1998. Retrieved: 15 May 2010.
- Ricketts, Bruce. "Broken Arrow, A Lost Nuclear Weapon in Canada". Mysteries of Canada, 11 January 2006. Retrieved: 17 August 2007.
- "Diver may have found 'lost nuke' missing since cold war off Canada coast". The Guardian. 4 November 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2016.
- "Object found off British Columbia coast not missing nuke". BBC News. 25 November 2016. Retrieved 26 November 2016.
- Adler, Les. "Albuquerque's Near-Doomsday." Archived 15 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine Albuquerque Tribune, 20 January 1994. Retrieved: 10 August 2009.
- "Factsheet:Convair B-36J" Archived 6 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine. National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 8 October 2010.
- Lednicer, David. "The Incomplete Guide to Airfoil Usage". m-selig.ae.illinois.edu. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
- Jorgenson, Michael, producer. "Lost Nuke". Archived 18 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine Myth Merchant Films, Spruce Grove, Alberta, 2004.
Bibliography
- Barlow, Jeffrey G. Revolt of the Admirals: The Fight for Naval Aviation, 1945–1950. Washington, D.C.: Naval Historical Center, 1994. ISBN 0-16-042094-6.
- Ford, Daniel. "B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads". Air and Space/Smithsonian, April 1996. Retrieved: 3 February 2007.
- Grant, R.G. and John R. Dailey. Flight: 100 Years of Aviation. Harlow, Essex, UK: DK Adult, 2007. ISBN 978-0-7566-1902-2.
- Jacobsen, Meyers K. Convair B-36: A Comprehensive History of America's "Big Stick". Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer Military History, 1997. ISBN 0-7643-0974-9.
- Jacobsen, Meyers K. Convair B-36: A Photo Chronicle. Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer Military History, 1999. ISBN 0-7643-0974-9.
- Jacobsen, Meyers K. "Peacemaker." Airpower, Vol. 4, No. 6, November 1974.
- Jacobsen, Meyers K. and Ray Wagner. B-36 in Action (Aircraft in Action Number 42). Carrollton, Texas: Squadron/Signal Publications Inc., 1980. ISBN 0-89747-101-6.
- Jenkins, Dennis R. B-36 Photo Scrapbook. St. Paul, Minnesota: Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers, 2003. ISBN 1-58007-075-2.
- Jenkins, Dennis R. Convair B-36 Peacemaker. St. Paul, Minnesota: Specialty Press Publishers and Wholesalers, 1999. ISBN 1-58007-019-1.
- Jenkins, Dennis R. Magnesium Overcast: The Story of the Convair B-36. North Branch, Minnesota: Specialty Press, 2002., ISBN 978-1-58007-129-1.
- Johnsen, Frederick A. Thundering Peacemaker, the B-36 Story in Words and Pictures. Tacoma, Washington: Bomber Books, 1978.
- Knaack, Marcelle Size. Encyclopedia of U.S. Air Force aircraft and missile systems Volume II: Post-World War II Bombers, 1945–1973. Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, 1988. ISBN 0-16-002260-6.Online - via media.defense.gov
- Leach, Norman S. Broken Arrow: America's First Lost Nuclear Weapon. Calgary, Alberta: Red Deer Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-88995-348-2.
- Miller, Jay and Roger Cripliver. "B-36: The Ponderous Peacemaker." Aviation Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1978.
- Miller, Jay. "Tip Tow & Tom-Tom". Air Enthusiast, No. 9, February–May 1979, pp. 40–42. ISSN 0143-5450.
- Morris, Lt. Col. (ret.) and Ted Allan. "Flying the Aluminum and Magnesium Overcast". The collected articles and photographs of Ted A. Morris, 2000. Retrieved: 4 September 2006.
- Orman, Edward W. "One Thousand on Top: A Gunner's View of Flight from the Scanning Blister of a B-36." Airpower, Vol. 17, No. 2, March 1987.
- Peacock, Lindsay. "B-36: Convair's "Big Stick": Part One". Air International, Vol. 39, No. 4, October 1990. pp. 230–234. ISSN 0306-5634.
- Peacock, Lindsay. "B-36: Convair's "Big Stick": Part Two". Air International, Vol. 39, No. 5, November 1990. pp. 279–286, 306. ISSN 0306-5634.
- Puryear, Edgar. Stars in Flight. Novato, California: Presidio Press, 1981. ISBN 0-89141-128-3
- Pyeatt, Don. B-36: Saving the Last Peacemaker (Third Edition). Fort Worth, Texas: ProWeb Publishing, 2006. ISBN 0-9677593-2-3.
- Shiel, Walter P. "The B-36 Peacemaker: 'There Aren't Programs Like This Anymore'". cessnawarbirds.com. Retrieved: 19 July 2009.
- Taylor, John W.R. "Convair B-36." Combat Aircraft of the World from 1909 to the present. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1969. ISBN 0-425-03633-2.
- Thomas, Tony. A Wonderful Life: The Films and Career of James Stewart. Secaucus, New Jersey: Citadel Press, 1988. ISBN 0-8065-1081-1.
- Wagner, Ray. American Combat Planes. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1968. ISBN 0-385-04134-9.
- Wilson, Stewart. Combat Aircraft since 1945. London: Aerospace Publications, 2000. ISBN 1-875671-50-1.
- Winchester, Jim. "Convair B-36". Military Aircraft of the Cold War (The Aviation Factfile). Rochester, Kent, UK: The Grange plc., 2006. ISBN 1-84013-929-3.
- Wolk, Herman S. Fulcrum of Power: Essays on the United States Air Force and National Security. Darby, Pennsylvania: Diane Publishing, 2003. ISBN 1-4289-9008-9.
- Yenne, Bill. "Convair B-36 Peacemaker." International Air Power Review, Vol. 13, Summer 2004. London: AirTime Publishing Inc., 2004. ISBN 1-880588-84-6.
External links
- USAF Museum: XB-36
- Documentary about the Convair b-36 Peacemaker
- USAF Museum: B-36A
- Video of The B-36 from Strategic Air Command. 5:32
- "I Flew with the Atomic Bombers", Popular Mechanics, April 1954, pp. 98–102, 264.
- AeroWeb: B-36 versions and survivors
- "Race For the Superbomb: Lt. Gen. James Edmundson interview transcript: Flying B-36 and B-47 planes" Archived 31 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine. PBS Online.
- ZiaNet: B-36 operations Walker AFB Roswell New Mexico 1955–1957
- "I Flew Thirty-One Hours in a B-36", Popular Mechanics, September 1950
- Size 36, 1950-produced "first public film" on the B-36, in detail
- Handbook flight operating instructions : USAF series B-36A aircraft – The Museum of Flight Digital Collections
Consolidated aircraft | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manufacturer designation | |||||||||||||||||
By role |
|
Convair and General Dynamics aircraft | |
---|---|
Manufacturer designations | |
Bombers | |
Fighters and attack aircraft | |
Civilian transports | |
Military transports | |
Experimental aircraft | |
General Dynamics | |
|
USAAS/USAAC/USAAF/USAF bomber designations, Army/Air Force and Tri-Service systems | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original sequences (1924–1930) |
| ||||||
Main sequence (1930–1962) |
| ||||||
Long-range bomber (1935–1936) | |||||||
Tri-Service sequence (1962–current) | |||||||
Non-sequential |
|
Nuclear propulsion | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spacecraft |
| ||||||||
Sea vessels | |||||||||
Aircraft |
| ||||||||
Ground | |||||||||
Categories:
- Convair B-36 Peacemaker
- Consolidated aircraft
- Convair aircraft
- 1940s United States bomber aircraft
- Six-engined pusher aircraft
- Aircraft with auxiliary jet engines
- Shoulder-wing aircraft
- Aircraft first flown in 1946
- Ten-engined aircraft
- Aircraft with retractable tricycle landing gear
- Six-engined piston aircraft