Talk:Kathryn Cramer: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:28, 30 January 2007 edit70.231.154.13 (talk) add section← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:04, 20 September 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,246,289 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(145 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~talkheader~~}}		{{Talk header}}
	{{~~Notable~~ ~~Wikipedian~~\|~~Pleasantville~~\|Cramer, Kathryn}}		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=c\|blp=yes\|listas=Cramer, Kathryn\|1=
			{{WikiProject Biography\|a&e-work-group=yes}}
	{{wikipedian-bio}}
			{{WikiProject United States\|importance=Low\|WA=yes\|WA-importance=low\|Seattle=yes\|Seattle-importance=low}}
			{{WikiProject New York (state)\|importance=Low\|Columbia=yes\|Columbia-importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Electronic literature\|women=yes}}
			{{WikiProject Women writers\|importance=MID}}
			}}
			{{Connected contributor\|Pleasantville\|declared=yes\|editedhere=yes}}
			{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
			\| age=2160
			\| archiveprefix=Talk:Kathryn Cramer/Archive
			\| numberstart=2
			\| maxarchsize=100000
			\| header={{Automatic archive navigator}}
			\| minkeepthreads=4
			\| format= %%i
			\| archivebox=yes
			\| box-advert=yes
			}}

			==SF Encyclopedia online==
	==Autobiography tizzy==
	I seemed to be #6 on Alvonruff's list of most popular ISFDB authors without a Misplaced Pages entry, and I'm not an easy subject, so I've started it myself. {{unsigned\|Pleasantville\|17:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)}}

			The new online version of the ] has an indepth entry on me. --] (]) 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) aka ]
	:Not a good idea, Kathryn. Please read ] and ]. ] <small>]</small> 03:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==
	::"Not a good idea" violates civility and assumption of good faith. The article is non-controversial, there is no NPOV question at issue here, and it's absurd to require writers to seek third parties to submit routine corrections and citations. This page is filled with mean and petty dispute, all of which is pointless and merely calls wikipedia into disrepute. '''If the editors (or trolls) behind this controversy are simply concerned about ], you may affix my signature to Kathryn's edits of this page.''' I have no doubt that there are dozens of writers and editors who would be happy to do the same -- and to affix their actual names, not (as you do) a pseudonym. ] 23:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	::: As this is your second edit in Misplaced Pages, I would appreciate that rather than making assertions about how this project should be run and what is appropriate or not, you take a bit of time and learn a bit more about the project before doing so. I have placed some pointers in your talk page. ] <small>]</small> 16:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

			I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
	:::: I explained the reason for infrequently editing wikipedia in my keynote lecture at WikiSym 2006. I'm quite familiar with the project and how it should be run and I am confident that '''this''' is not how it should be run. Cramer has elsewhere offered an excellent discussion of the real needs of editors and scholars for material like this -- material which you would deny the community. The consequence, apparently, will be an imminent fork in which the experts will create a separate resource leaving the pseudonymous trolls to cultivate wikipedia. That's an undesirable outcome. {{unsigned\|MarkBernstein}} 04:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110920202744/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html
			*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/text_761563123__1/Science_Fiction.html

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	:::::Mark, if you are familiar with this project you should be aware of our core policies, including ] and ]. All information in an article, even the names of the subject's parents, should be verifiable by any reader. If the subject of an article adds informatoon which is known only to them then we are just taking their word for unverifiable facts. While the names of parents might be uncontroversial the principle is important. Suppose they claim to have held a certain position or received an award, should we just assume they are right? Further, can anyone be assumed to write a truly neutral article about his or herself? The answer is "no", we can't make that assumption. So we'd be happy if you or another person wrote a verifiable, neutral article about this subject. -] · ] · 01:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	:::: The article has always been NPOV, and only a handful of facts have raised questions of verifiability. Some of the verifiability questions (like the parentage) are well founded. Others have been answered, but the sniping continues unabated. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:{{{2\|}}}\| {{{2}}}\|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 05:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
	:::::This isn't sniping. It's a review. As for neutrality, there were problems with the first version that Pleasantville created. We don't have to go into it. -] · ] · 19:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	Jossi: Look, whoever you are, this is absurd. Your requests for citations for my parentage academic degrees etc. and requests for citations when citations are already given (did you follow the LINK to the Hugo Semiprozine category? No. You didn't) These are essentially harassment.

			I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
	Kathryn {{unsigned2\|16:04, 26 January 2007\|Pleasantville}}
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160121185518/http://www.locusmag.com/News/2016/01/david-g-hartwell-1941-2016/ to http://www.locusmag.com/News/2016/01/david-g-hartwell-1941-2016
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222120924/http://math.cofc.edu/kasman/MATHFICT/mfview.php?callnumber=mf52 to http://math.cofc.edu/kasman/MATHFICT/mfview.php?callnumber=mf52
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129025711/http://newbooksinsciencefiction.com/2014/11/05/kathryn-cramer-and-ed-finn-hieroglyph-stories-and-visions-for-a-better-future-william-morrow-2014/ to http://newbooksinsciencefiction.com/2014/11/05/kathryn-cramer-and-ed-finn-hieroglyph-stories-and-visions-for-a-better-future-william-morrow-2014/

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	:I am sorry to hear you consider that harassment. Me and others have asked you ''not'' to edit your own article. You are welcome to provide material in this talk page. Please read our guidelines about ] ] <small>]</small> 21:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	::Try not to get carried away and bite her, Jossi. ] is a useful guideline but not a bludgeon to smack people with. Obviously, a person is concerned that an article about them should represent them in a certain way. Let's work with that understanding and a bit more patience. ] 02:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 06:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
	== Cite web template ==

			== External links modified (January 2018) ==
	Let me introduce you to the {{tl\|cite web}} template:

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	<tt><nowiki>{{cite web \|url= \|title= \|accessdate=</nowiki>{{CURRENTYEAR}}-{{CURRENTMONTH}}-{{CURRENTDAY2}}<nowiki> \|last= \|first= \|authorlink= \|coauthors= \|date= \|year= \|month= \|format= \|work= \|publisher= \|pages= \|language= \|archiveurl= \|archivedate= \|quote= }}</nowiki></tt>

			I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019231720/http://www.fantasticmetropolis.com/i/disextinction/ to http://www.fantasticmetropolis.com/i/disextinction/
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031110821/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit31.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit31.html

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	] <small>]</small> 22:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	== We have asked... ==

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
	... that you ''do not'' edit your own article. But you chose to ignore our guidelines. May you consider stopping editing your article? ] <small>]</small> 22:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

	==Tidying==
	I've removed some material that struck me as definitely not notable or relevant, but I'm wondering whether there is a general notability concern. Any thoughts? ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 23:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

	So my blog is cited in the New York Times, Forbes, the BBC etc. and it's not notable? You are a hoot. What is notable?] 23:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

	:I only looked at the NYT piece, and it quoted you in relation to the Pakistan work, and in quoting you, mentioned your blog. That doesn't in and of itself make your blog notable. It also doesn't in and of itself make you notable.

	:It would help a lot if you'd tone down the insults you're doling out all over the place. It's actually not much of a hoot to me that I'm spending this time trying to sort this issue out. You shouldn't have created the page in the first place. If you are really notable, someone else would have done so. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 23:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

	I can't see much in the way of insults but I'd urge Kathryn to try to ''work with'' Slim, rather than feel she is someone to fight against. Slim's grasp of how things work here will be invaluable to you in getting things done. But Slim, the article is here now. Let's not jump up and down on the person concerned for creating it. Not everyone is clear on the "rules" here and people are obviously concerned to be represented in what seems to them fair terms. We do have articles on people who are not ''all that important'', so it's sometimes difficult for an outsider to understand why they should not be included. ] 02:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	:Hi GN, there have been comments elsewhere from Pleasantville that have been unhelpful; that's what I was referring to. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 08:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
	:... Such as calling editors that responded on a posting at ] "semi-anonymous people acting like jerks", making sarcastic comments about "mind group", posting an in her blog in which he called these editors "a pack of officious trolls", and being dismissive to ''all'' comments made by others. ] <small>]</small> 17:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	== Length of biblio section ==

	The biblio section is way too long. I woud appreciate to know from the author, what would be a representative sampling of her work, rather the the whole collection of essays, reviews and other such as available here http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?Kathryn%20Cramer

	] <small>]</small> 00:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	:I think the standard used at ] should be applied. Of course, Dr Connolley is an admin here so he doesn't get much in the way of bullying from editors for editing his own article, but just about everything he's ever published seems to be on his list. ] 02:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	::I do not think that William Connolley edited that article on his own, and I do not think that when he edited his article that he was an admin. In any case, I am asking the subject of this article to provide a shortlist of the most prominent works that she has published, as to not make this into a catalog. And if you think that the comments made to this person are "bullying" I would suggest that you explicitly say who and when so that it can be properly addressed. Such wide-ranging statements are not helpful. ] <small>]</small> 05:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
	:::I think repeatedly making the same "request" constitutes bullying, Jossi. Littering an article with demands for sources could also be considered overaggressive. This now seems to be shifting the point of attack. Slow down. Chill out. ] 07:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
	::::Well, I
	disagree with your assessment. Rather than passing judgment on the behavior of others, you can roll your sleeves and help. ] <small>]</small> 16:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	:The list that Pleasantville added was taken directly from , and I've shortened it a little, but I agree it should be shortened further. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 08:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	The problem with the ISFDB bibio is that parts of it are wrong. I am not an easy bibliographic subject, so some of what I've put here is corrections to what's in the ISFDB. I don't disagree that the biblio could be shortened. If done 2 rounds of shortening it myself.

	Also, if you are going to reference Gary Westfahl on hard sf as further reading, please also reference my chapter on Hard SF in the Cambridge Companion to SF: http://cco.cambridge.org/extract?id=ccol0521816262_CCOL0521816262A018 (ed. Farah Mendlesohn & Edward James.] 19:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	:If ISFDB is incorrect, Kathryn, it is not up to Misplaced Pages to fix it. You may want to contact the maintainers of that database to get these entries fixed. It may sound counterintuitive, but in Misplaced Pages we speak of "verifiability, not truth". See ]. ] <small>]</small> 19:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

	Ah, the death of print. The titles pages of the printed books trump ISFDB. Yes? Or does Misplaced Pages had a rule against citing print sources?
	Regarding a reference for Harvard, see my bio on the Eastgate Systems website which has been that way since about 1994. http://www.eastgate.com/people/Cramer.html ] 02:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
	:The title of a book is easily verifiable via its ISBN number. Follow this link, for example: ISBN 0-06113-154-7 , and use the Library of Congress catalog link there. ] <small>]</small> 02:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	The issue is not title. The issue is authorship. I have multiple books with title page credit but not cover credit. I take it you are not familiar with the term "title page bibliography". Also the online Library of Congress Catalog is incomplete.] 15:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:Are these books you've edited or written? ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 15:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	::The titles in question are anthologies which Cramer edited. ] 18:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::I wonder whether we should even be listing them in that case. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 21:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::I would argue for inclusion on "cover credits" only, as per other authors biblio sections. ] <small>]</small> 22:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	==Conflict of Interest==
	I put a conflict of interest tag on this page, it seemed appropriate as the subject started the page and contributed most of the content. Notability also appears to be right on the line. --] 03:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:Notability is not in question, Daniel. See http://www.harpercollins.com/authors/20277/Kathryn_Cramer/index.aspx?authorID=20277 ] <small>]</small> 05:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	::That's probably written by her too, though. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 15:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	::: Notability within the science fiction field is not in question. She is a multiple-time Hugo nominee, to name her most prominent claim to fame. She was a pioneer in hypertext; she is a name to conjure with in some circles. You are definitely verging on personal vendetta here, Slim. The question of self-editing is old news; let's all quit the griping, assume good will for parties on '''''both''''' sides, and concentrate on making this a better article.--] 18:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	Also, Daniel, SlimVirgin cut most of the referencs to such publications as The New York Times, Forbes, the BBC, the Washington Post, Nature magazine, etc. Um. A helpful hint. Perhaps having a look at a few recent editions of Who's Who in America might prove illuminating and might assist in verifying some of the information I provided. (I myself don't have a copy because I didn't spend the $300 buck to see my name up in lights; I think it was the 2006 edition.) ] 15:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:No, I cut your reference to your blog. Kathryn, could I ask you to stop self-promoting, please? If you would stop doing that, you'd be in a better frame of mind to understand what we mean by an encyclopedia article. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 15:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:Also note that '']'' is mostly never used as a reliable source for biographies in WP, due to the "vanity" aspects of these type of publications ] <small>]</small> 16:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


	::The notability discussion, like the recent attempt to assert that Dave Winer is not notable, is clearly consistent with uncivil personal axe-grinding and inconsistent with Misplaced Pages standards of fairness, civility, and indeed with the traditions of scholarship. Jossi and SlimVirgin, for some reason, continually argue against Cramer's credentials, finding one reason or another to doubt things that are widely known and easily verified. Cramer is incontenstibly the editor of numerous important science fiction anthologies that are widely read and influential. This is not in question. Cramer's NYRSF has been nominated for the Hugo award on numerous occasions. This is not in question. Cramer's early work in literary hypertext is not in question. There is no good faith reason for this controversy. ] 18:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::Please do not misrepresent my comments. I never asserted lack of notability. On the contrary. ] <small>]</small> 18:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::I agree notability is probably established, that doesn't mean the COI tag should go, the self promotional qualities of this article should not go without notice. --] 18:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	::::Does anyone know what is meant by "She is an ] in the use of digital ] for ]"? ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 19:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::::Thanks, Jossi. I'm still not clear on the notability issue. Can anyone say exactly what she's notable for? ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 21:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::::: (a) She and David Hartwell select ''The Year's Best Science Fiction'' and have done so for years, making them a leading voice in contemporary science fiction. (b) Her major anthologies on Hard SF and Space Opera have helped define current trends in science fiction and deliniate literary discourse on the future. (c) Her research in reconciling online mapping resources such as Goggle Maps with disaster-related satellite photography has appeared in major publications (e.g. Nature) and, more to the point, was of significant importance in the Katrina aftermath, as it was for some time the sole public source of information on the status of domiciles (and, by inference, their inhabitance) trapped in the flood. (d) She published an influential short hypertext fiction which appeared before the Web was invented, which has been widely taught and reviewed, and she edited other important early hypertext fictions. (e) She's been nominated for a slew of Hugo awards. ] 00:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::::::Just to address the last point, she herself writes that the Hugo award nominations are given to her despite the fact that she does almost nothing for the magazine. Perhaps this is irony, but it's hard to tell. Mark, I also know you know her in real life. I'm really not trying to be difficult, and I'm sorry if I'm being obtuse or offensive, but there's a distinct lack of independent third party sources here, and that concerns me. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 04:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::::: My question is has she been the subject of multiple verifiable article in reputable sources? As far as I can tell she receives only a passing mention in the NY Times piece on satellite mapping, beyond that I don't see much in the way of reputable sources for the article to meet ] she does appear to have some fans in the Misplaced Pages community, but the sharpness with which they respond to what really seem to be pretty well intentioned actions of editors to improve the article makes me wonder. I don't think anyone her has any thing against Kathryn, but I am not sure this article would pass an AFD. This situation reminds me of a number of AFDs, where a users first action was to create a page about themselves (when they are of fringe notability), the reaction of users unfamiliar with Misplaced Pages is often hostility when confronted with the work of well intentioned editors. I sure would like to see an article in some reputable publication that is focused on Kathryn Cramer, it would help me sleep better at night. --] 03:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

	::::::::Yes, that's what I'd like to see. Pretty well everything I've found has taken its information from Cramer herself. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 04:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::: There are abundant books written or edited by Mrs Cramer. You can check Google books for example: . That in itself will make this person notable as an sf author/editor. Besides that, there are several books that mentions Cramer in that capacity. So I would not be concerned with notability issues, but with a good, simple, and NPOV article, removing any material that may not be directly relevant to her notability. ] <small>]</small> 04:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::::::: I see that she has written plenty, but I still fail to see what has been written about her. Writing a lot of books doesn't automatically make one notable, if these books have not garnered her enough attention to make her the subject of any non trivial articles then I can't see enough notability. Book reviews could be construed as being about the author, are there any that we could look at? --] 04:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

	:::::::::: (ed conf) If you follow the Google books link above, you will find books that refer to Cramer's work, not just books authored or edited by Cramer. I have not explored these in detail, though. ] <small>]</small> 04:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::::::Agreed. She would get a '''Keep''' vote from me in an AFD. --] 04:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::::Perhaps Kathryn or Mark could help out here by supplying a list of independent third-party sources i.e. independent reliable publications that have published material about Kathryn Cramer that hasn't been entirely supplied by her, or independent book reviews, as Daniel suggests. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 04:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:04, 20 September 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kathryn Cramer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

Electronic literature: Women

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature
	This article is supported by Women Electronic Literature Writers Task Force.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Pleasantville (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

SF Encyclopedia online

The new online version of the Science Fiction Encyclopedia has an indepth entry on me. --Pleasantville (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) aka Kathryn Cramer

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kathryn Cramer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110920202744/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/HugoNomList.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/text_761563123__1/Science_Fiction.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kathryn Cramer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Categories: