Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Edgar de Evia (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:30, 20 September 2021 editDamiens.rf (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users23,536 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Edgar de Evia.Tag: Twinkle		Latest revision as of 21:56, 27 September 2021 edit undoEddie891 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators56,086 edits →Edgar de Evia: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''keep'''. ] <small>''<sup> ]</sup> <sub>]</sub>'' </small> 21:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
	===]===		===]===
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|B}}
	<div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article:		<div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article:
	{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar de Evia}}		{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar de Evia}}
Line 9:		Line 15:
	Biography for a non-notable photographer. ] 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)		Biography for a non-notable photographer. ] 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)</small>
			*'''Keep'''. A simple google books search revealed multiple sources with independent significant coverage (just scroll through the first 4 or 5 pages). Clearly a competent ] was not done. I found a review of his work in '']'': See: {{cite news\|title=COLOR IN REVIEW: Popular Photography's Color Annual Surveys Medium's Current Status How Creative Is Color?" Range of Effects Color vs. Black and White\|work=]\|date=19 May 1957\|page= X17}}] (]) 20:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
			*'''Keep''' multiple hits on Google books indicate that the subject was much discussed and there is no shortage of references about him. ] (]) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
			{{clear}}
			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 21:56, 27 September 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 _Work 21:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Edgar de Evia

AfDs for this article:

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography for a non-notable photographer. damiens.rf 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. damiens.rf 16:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Keep. A simple google books search revealed multiple sources with independent significant coverage (just scroll through the first 4 or 5 pages). Clearly a competent WP:BEFORE was not done. I found a review of his work in The New York Times: See: "COLOR IN REVIEW: Popular Photography's Color Annual Surveys Medium's Current Status How Creative Is Color?" Range of Effects Color vs. Black and White". The New York Times. 19 May 1957. p. X17.4meter4 (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep multiple hits on Google books indicate that the subject was much discussed and there is no shortage of references about him. Mccapra (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.