Misplaced Pages

User talk:WeniWidiWiki: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:33, 1 February 2007 editRenamed user 5417514488 (talk | contribs)8,841 edits The message on your userpage: comment← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:17, 8 July 2012 edit undoFonsScientiae (talk | contribs)1,507 edits Brown people AfD: new section 
(288 intermediate revisions by 75 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''</div><br> '''</div><br>


] ]

]

]


] ]


__NOTOC__
== The message on your userpage ==

== Brown people AfD ==


Hello, I saw that you voted on the deletion of the article ] / ] back in January 2007 ]. As you probably know the result of the voting was a slight keep, so the article is still there. I found the article recently and considered it unacceptable, so I nominated it for deletion again. Could you please visit the article or deletion page and cast your vote? I would really appreciate it. Thank you. ] (]) 14:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I cannot say I am that impressed with message 2 on your userpage - it seems to go against the spirit of WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL and also the honking big "The 💕 anyone can edit" message we have on the frontpage rather than the "the 💕 anyone can edit if they are not too lazy to get an account". --] 23:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
: I support Fredrick's comment. '']'' ] 00:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:17, 8 July 2012

You've reached the talk page of WeniWidiWiki. Discussions are archived, unless still ongoing. Click here to post a message.


Old Discussions

Older Discussions

Much Older Discussions

Good Guy Badges


Brown people AfD

Hello, I saw that you voted on the deletion of the article Brown people / Brown race back in January 2007 here. As you probably know the result of the voting was a slight keep, so the article is still there. I found the article recently and considered it unacceptable, so I nominated it for deletion again. Could you please visit the article or deletion page and cast your vote? I would really appreciate it. Thank you. FonsScientiae (talk) 14:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)