| Revision as of 01:11, 1 February 2007 editWeniWidiWiki (talk | contribs)2,824 edits →The message on your userpage← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:17, 8 July 2012 edit undoFonsScientiae (talk | contribs)1,507 edits →Brown people AfD: new section | ||
| (287 intermediate revisions by 75 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| '''</div><br> | '''</div><br> | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| __NOTOC__ | |||
| == The message on your userpage == | |||
| == Brown people AfD == | |||
| Hello, I saw that you voted on the deletion of the article ] / ] back in January 2007 ]. As you probably know the result of the voting was a slight keep, so the article is still there. I found the article recently and considered it unacceptable, so I nominated it for deletion again. Could you please visit the article or deletion page and cast your vote? I would really appreciate it. Thank you. ] (]) 14:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I cannot say I am that impressed with message 2 on your userpage - it seems to go against the spirit of WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL and also the honking big "The 💕 anyone can edit" message we have on the frontpage rather than the "the 💕 anyone can edit if they are not too lazy to get an account". --] 23:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I support Fredrick's comment. '']'' ] 00:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Well last I checked, editors were still permitted to hold personal opinions and edit their userpages as they see fit. Thanks for sharing your opinions. Myself and many others who are bogged down reverting and warning the constant vandalism of wikipedia by IP editors do not agree. - ] 01:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:17, 8 July 2012
You've reached the talk page of WeniWidiWiki. Discussions are archived, unless still ongoing. Click here to post a message.
Brown people AfD
Hello, I saw that you voted on the deletion of the article Brown people / Brown race back in January 2007 here. As you probably know the result of the voting was a slight keep, so the article is still there. I found the article recently and considered it unacceptable, so I nominated it for deletion again. Could you please visit the article or deletion page and cast your vote? I would really appreciate it. Thank you. FonsScientiae (talk) 14:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)