| Revision as of 23:26, 2 February 2007 editLight current (talk | contribs)30,368 edits →TOAT comments: more← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:35, 6 March 2020 edit undoGoodguy12345678910 (talk | contribs)26 edits they were being mean to me.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit | ||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| <div id="shortcut" style="border: 2px solid #669; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #c9B1DE"> | |||
| ] | |||
| '''Please post new TOPICS to the <big><font color="red"><b>TOP</b></big></font> of my talk page (but below this notice). For adding comments under existing headings, use contents box to get to the right section | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tlc|hang on}} to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact ] to request that the administrator ] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-test-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] 21:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <big><font color="yellow"> <b> Hmm Anyone can accuse me of being severely mentally ill and get away with it. But I suggest someone drop from a great height and I get blocked for a whole frigging week. How does that work?????</b></big></font> <br> | |||
| == File:TerribleSpelling.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == hi == | |||
| ---------------------'''Please use headlines when starting new topics''' -----------'''Thank you'''---------''' | |||
| -----Saying of the day: '''Beware the ]''' | |||
| ------------------------- | |||
| Hello <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| </div> | |||
| == File:BadassBassBridge.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 07:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Just to let you know == | |||
| ==Archives== | |||
| If your comment has been archived, you can always copy it back here to continue a discussion. Please do not, however, edit the archived page. | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| <!--- PLEASE PUT YOUR COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE ---> | |||
| You have been mentioned at ]. X] (]) 14:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Goodbye?== | |||
| == Notification of automated file description generation == | |||
| I may be permanently blocked soon. So it time to say goodbye to all my freinds. To my adversaries I say 'Au revoir'--] 23:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. | |||
| This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 12:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == A riddle == | |||
| Which is the odd one out? | |||
| *Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| *Man | |||
| ==File source problem with File:Musicians earplug.JPG== | |||
| *Woman | |||
| ] | |||
| *Carpet | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ]. | |||
| *Admin | |||
| If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| Answer Admin. Because you can: | |||
| Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 17:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| *beat a man | |||
| ==File source problem with File:ComponentsCrop.jpg== | |||
| *beat awoman | |||
| ] | |||
| *beat a carpet | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ]. | |||
| If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| But you cant beat an Admin (especially when he uses his FUCKING BIG STICK to beat you into a slimy pulped submission. How frigging brave is that?) '''Fucking cowards''' all of em--] 22:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 16:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==On a lighter note== | |||
| What does it say about me that, when you posted "For instance I know sweet FA!" on the RD, I spent a few seconds wondering what Featured Articles had to do with it? Obviously, ''nice'' Featured Articles...] 22:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Fuck All!--] 22:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, I ''know'' that's what it means in this context, but still it took me seconds. Just thought I'd try share a normal wiki-moment. Or were you swearing at me? In which case I'll restrict my comments to you to serious matters. ] 22:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == High count editors-as much shit as they can swallow == | |||
| Now I know why there are so few high count (> say 25k) non admin editors. Its because they've had as much shit as they can swallow--] 22:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Surprise surprise == | |||
| THe Admins win again. How novel (actually its getting a bit boring -- cant you let the underdog win once in a while?). Maybe you could try playing without that fucking big stick in your hand to even up the odds a bit/?--] 21:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Anchoress statements == | |||
| If Anchoress is truly sorry for calling me ] or mentally ill or not in control of my senses, she will come here to apologise in person. Those remarks truly hurt me. If she also gives me a big kiss (like this: XXXX) I will forgive her completely and we can be best friends again!--] 21:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == AN/I == | |||
| If you remove that thread again I ''will'' block you. ] 15:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I know you would 8-)) That would nearly be a RRR violation. Is that right? --] 15:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Inappropriate redaction == | |||
| How did you feel that was in any way appropriate? Unilaterally deleting someone elses conversation because you don't like the subject is poor behavior. I find it fantastically unlikely that you didn't know this, especially considering your level of experience here. Have more consideration for your fellow editors, please, and use your judgement wisely. - ]</small> (]) 15:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I removed it because it is well off the topic of ] stalking me and is intended to divert attention from the problem. Posts of that nature do not belong on the AN/I 8-)--] 15:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Where else do you think administrators should discuss the topic of an allegedly disruptive editor? ] 15:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::It is inappropriate for you to unilaterally removing conversations other people are having in the matter you chose to employ, Light current. If you feel the posts were "off topic" or otherwise damaging, and the topic is YOU, then you should ask someone else to remove it instead. If you were removing a thread about someone else, that would be somewhat more defensible, but there is a distinct conflict of interest for what you did. - ]</small> (]) 15:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::OK SOrry. I dont think that thread should be there. Would you consider removing it please?--] 15:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't see why it should be removed, people are using it to talk. ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 15:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ah well! Time to go have some tea and talk to the wall instead!--] 15:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hey man == | |||
| I like you, I really do. But you're all over my watch list at the moment and the edits I've seen make me really worried that you're talking '''yourself''' into a block. I'd be sad to see that happen. Please don't. I'd advise a Wikibreak, but I think you've just been on one. I'd advise ], but actually I think right now that'd be like taking an aspirin to cure decapitation. Whatever, please do chill a little. --] 14:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :tanks for warning. Which particular edits are you referring to?--] 14:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm going to politely decline to respond, because I don't want to be drawn into an unnecessary row with you. You've got enough on your hands at the moment and I'm about to go offline. Just accept well-intentioned thoughts. Suggestion that's more productive than tea, or Wikibreak etc... find some electronics stubs or otherwise tagged articles and give a fresh lick of paint and leave alone any pages that begin "Misplaced Pages" or "User talk" for a while? --] 14:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Anti funny template == | |||
| {{nohumor||— ] 01:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)|diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_user_warnings&curid=3134246&diff=104950501&oldid=104888107}} <!-- no subst: on purpose --> | |||
| ==RDs better or worse without me?== | |||
| moved from RD talk--] 10:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Better === | |||
| ===worse=== | |||
| (Worse '''without''' Light Current, just in case the ambiguity throws anyone off) - I say, the more = the merrier, and I've found LC's contributions to be helpful (not to mention human)! ] 04:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Worse''' Without LC at his best, when his amazing span of knowledge is used to provide factual and sourced answers to questions, with a light-hearted tone. These high quality posts are sometimes offset by excessive metadiscussion and drama regarding disagreement about what should be included or the order in which comments should appear, and there sometimes is a seeming intent to draw administrative sanctions. "People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along?" - ] (1992) ] 17:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===just as bad=== | |||
| * ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 17:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Other comments === | |||
| * It depends, as with all users, on what he posts. -- ] 09:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :This isnt a vote, its a gauge of opinin. look I didnt stay away from RD talk for 10 days for nothing. i want to know what people think!--] 09:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I really have very little more to add to what I have written above, and if I am honest I think there are some people a lot worse than you. I hope you won't take it the wrong way if I say that, in my estimation, you sometimes act a little like the court jester. That's not necessarily a bad thing, though it's important to maintain a sense of proportion. Wit and gravity should walk hand in hand. ] | |||
| ::Maybe I'm an attention seeker? even tho the truth might hurt, I prefer it!--] 09:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::What is the unit of measurement of light current? Lamperes?] 17:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Very good 8-) Same as for heavy ] I should think! Or could be 'Camps' or maybe ]s/sec to be serious!--] 23:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Actually, based on recent events, the best unit is blocks/sec--] 23:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Truth be told, I noticed your absence and did my very best to cover the lack of jollity thus ensuing. I wouldn't be surprised if people failed to notice your absence merely because of my antics. As it is, I'm thinking about taking a 24-hour Wikibreak, so you'll have to cover for ''me''! ] 21:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Court jestorship === | |||
| :Aha! You wanna take over as ]?--] 01:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''In literature, the jester is symbolic of common sense and of honesty, notably ], the court jester is a character used for insight and advice on the part of the ], taking advantage of his licence to mock and speak freely to dispense frank observations and highlight the folly of his monarch. This presents a clashing irony as a "greater" man could dispense the same advice and find himself being detained in the dungeons or even executed. Only as the lowliest member of the court can the jester be the monarch's most useful advisor.'' | |||
| Hmmm! 8-))--] 01:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hee hee! Only you can be the jester. I'll, uh, be the, uhh, understudy... ^_^ ] 01:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes acting the fool is a very serious business! Also you can get thrown into the dungeons at any time for making a bad joke ! 8-(--] 01:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Better stock up on ] : 13" × 8", 330mm × 203mm for drafting your merriment and for chapeaus. ] 15:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Atlant == | |||
| If you know any other mature and experienced users, you should nominate them for adminship. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; font-weight:bold; border:none; font-size:10pt; background: #F0F8FF; padding:2px; line-height:10pt; width:30em;">—] (] <small>•</small> ]) </span> 20:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hmm difficult--] 22:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC Scratchpad == | |||
| ] | |||
| == RfC == | |||
| I see that you've identified me as one of your targets for RfC in . I'd be glad to help you with it in any way you need, if jabbing out at me will make you feel better and could help you get past whatever strange thing you're going through, then let's get started. Since you're current under sanction, might I suggest that you begin work on the formal RfC in your userspace on a subpage instead of soapboxing on your talk page? That way, once your block is over, you can move it straight over to RfC and get the ball rolling. - ]</small> (]) 23:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I'm with Chairboy on this one. I'll be happy to co-operate with you in anyway I can. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 00:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please dont be sarcastic, hypocritical or condescending toward me. Thanks 8-((--] 01:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Could you explain please how anyone other than you is being any of the above at the moment? - ]</small> (]) 01:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes. Look at your own edits for a start.--] 01:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| BTW, I note that you appear to have accidentally deleted this section, so I've restored it for your response. As you've just 'promoted' me (I take it you disagree with some things I've been saying) on your enemies list, I strongly urge you to consider my offer above more than ever. - ]</small> (]) 00:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Strange you should all be as keen as turkeys at Xmas. Seems to be a attitude to me8-?--] 00:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::We're just trying to help. That your behavior has been egregious is obvious to everyone but yourself. If an RfC can give you the reality check that gets you back on the right path, then we should do it by all means, and immediately. - ]</small> (]) 01:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::No youre not! Please dont try to patronise me 8-(( '''You''' will feel the full force of an Rfc. Are you braced for it?--] 01:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I understand that you're frustrated, but I'm not patronizing you. RfC isn't a weapon, btw, it's a tool to gauge community consensus on something special. No 'bracing' is needed, and like I mentioned above, I'm offering to assist you in any way necessary in your efforts to file the RfC. - ]</small> (]) 01:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I dont believe you! What about blocking: is that a weapon, punishment or preventaive measure?--] 01:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I'll ask the admin who's currently blocking you if they'd consider unblocking you on the condition that you'd only edit the RfC you're filing for the remnant of your block, I just want to make sure you'll abide by those conditions before I make the request. - ]</small> (]) 01:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Not worth the effort. I have so many things to say to so many people. Not just about inapproporiate and outrageous admin actions and comments. | |||
| :Maybe its best for me to be forced to store them up and let them fester in order to vent them with maximum ejaculatory force, virulity and damning damage when I am finally unblocked? 8-)--] 01:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Now that your block is up, I assume that you'll be filing the RfC. Can I assist? - ]</small> (]) 02:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Im just recovering from a painful shoulder injury so my response time may be a little longer thtn normal 8-((--] 02:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Based on the prolific number of edits you've made today, I take it you've healed! Good to hear, I'm glad you had a speedy recovery. I assume you'll be creating the RfC now? - ]</small> (]) 02:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::thank you im getting better. but part of my editing ability tonite is due to lots of pain killers and a few beverages. I shall need to recover my emotional strength before embarking on tha RfC (which of course can only be on one person). so I would ask you to have patience. remember, this is not a persnal revenge attack against the unlucky admin: this is an attempt to get admins to abide by the current blocking policy -- thats all. nothing personal you understand. basically i would like to say that i have nothing against the individual adm=ins as people: its just some of their actions i disagree with. 8-)--] 02:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Also, I would hope that the community is prepared to give me just a little 'warm up' time after my recent spell in the cooler. Im warming up by doing some editing on real (important) articles (how novel!)--] 02:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Light current, if you're going to go ahead and file an RfC (or several RfCs), then do so. You've been expressing disinterest – sometimes rather rudely – in receiving advice or input from the community in the informal setting of your talk page (, , to choose a couple just from today). If you feel that a more formal and structured request for comment is the route that you need to follow, then so be it. | |||
| :I dont really understand what you re saying here! 8-?--] 22:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Now you're engaging in a ranking (and reranking) of editors for your RfC threat (). Calling those editors 'evil' – which ''is'' what you're doing, whether it's struck through or not – and playing silly games with their rankings is both impolite and unproductive. Either file an RfC or quit playing ]. You've said (just up there ↑) that you're interested in contributing productively for a while rather than filing an RfC, and that you're not driven by a desire for personal revenge—good on you. Live up to those statements. ](]) 22:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Gonna block me again? What ewxcuse this time?--] 22:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You've been taking jabs at people like this quite a bit over the last 24 hours. If you want to make yourself a martyr, you'll succeed; if you want to contribute, then stop playing games. As Ten said, either file an RfC or move on. -- ] 22:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Why so impatient my furry friend? And what do you mean by jabs?--] 22:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === TOAT comments === | |||
| <small>(after edit conflicts)</small> I'd actually prefer that you stick with being a productive and polite editor, and try to resist the urge to goad other editors into blocking you by being rude and keeping a ranked shitlist. I don't get some sort of perverse pleasure from seeing you blocked, you know. You're a very intelligent contributor who is capable of doing good writing and being a net benefit to Misplaced Pages. I wish you'd stick to doing that, rather than trying to figure out how to make me – or someone else – block you. ](]) 22:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for your vote of confidence in me. I'd actually prefer to stick with being a productive and polite editor, however, this is made difficult by virulent comments on my edits from various quarters. | |||
| :In no case have I intiated these exchanges, but I feel obliged to defend myself. When this proper defence results in my blocking I have a right to feel aggreived. | |||
| I want to make sure that All Admins are operating withing the blocking policy and not according to their own loose interpretation of it. And this is the purpose of the RfC | |||
| :Im not trying to get blocked: believe me I try to avoid it at all costs. But what I see as an innocent comment is spometimes taken by some others as being offensive when it is not meant to be. I see the problem as some Admins not AGF enough and of trying to read something smutty or troublesome into EVERYTHING iI say. Other editrs get away with far more risque comments thqan I could possibly hope to these days. in other words Im being victimised by a small group of Admins who will block me for no good reason other than their own erroneos interpretations of the bvlocking policy and out of revenge or temper tantrums: like you did to me over THB when I was only offering him support and trying to make light of his block.--] 23:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === brenneman === | |||
| I've made this offer before, so I'd hope you don't think I'm being sarcastic: If you want help framing a request for comment, I will place myself at your service. Regardless of the outcome, it might help to put whatever problems/concerns you've got into a more structured format, so that not only can someone ''else'' look them over but you ''yourself'' can re-examine them. - <font color="black">]</font> 01:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :But things like aren't going to fly: Don't call other users vandals, and either make a serious attempt at creating a request for comment of stop threataning to do so. I am going to re-remove the section and if you replace it I'll block you for disruption, while still extending my hand to assist you (via email perhaps) in creating said requests for comment. - <font color="black">]</font> 01:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::How can it be disruptive to WP to organise my own talk page?--] 01:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I'm not going to engage you in a long discussion on this, per my previous (e.g. Not _this_ week) discussion with you, but here's a short one: Actually creating a scratch-space request for comment mean digging out diffs, writing some convincing prose, etc. This would indicate that you're willing to do some ''work'' in order to solve a percieved problem. Just plopping the list there is (assuming good faith of course) fantastic trolling-by-accident. Look at the proportion of response (and diverted effort) to input. | |||
| ''proportion of response (and diverted effort) to input.'' I dont understand that. Could you pls explain?--] 02:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: If you really think there is a problem, I'm all for solving problems. But I'm also no-nonsense about ''stopping'' problems, and the manner you've chosen to proceed to date with this has been a problem. | |||
| ::: <font color="black">]</font> 01:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes I intend to do this work as soon as +the present harrassment stops and im feeling well enought to do it. You think I should prepare all the stuff in secret and then plop it on an RfC page Yes? Also what problem are you referring to?--] 01:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Problem = you are being harrassed (your perspective); you are baiting admins (admins perspective). | |||
| Problem, with respect to proposing RfC but not actually moving down the path (trolling-by-accident) = wasting time of many editors, including yourself, if stand off continues without useful discussion (wikipedia perspective). | |||
| Solution = RfC to bring all concerns to the table to enable a productive discussion hopefully leading to a resolved conflict. | |||
| RfC scratch page is not secret if it is on wikipedia in your user domain. I expect Aaron already has it on his watch list. ] ] 03:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Did you not hear that Im recuperating from a serious shoulder injury that makes typing difficult? I can only type one handed The amount of typing the RfC will need Im not fit enough for yet. Althogh the doctor has said to keep my arm moving, it is extremely painful. Also being in pain causes confusion of the mind as Im sure you know.--] 08:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Actually no, I didn't. Clearly time for a break and I hope it recovers fully. Forget the RfC if you're restricted to typing with one hand. Hey, maybe you won't need the RfC by the time you're back typing like a ..... can't think of what to call it, a ]? ...must be something better; like ]? None of these are working for me. Nevermind, and make sure you rest well. ] ] 08:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::No you miss the point; Some AdminS are acting outside the blocking policy. I want to do something about it. An Rfc on one of the worst offenders seems the only way. --] 11:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I know the point, but they clearly think they are acting in the best interests of the encyclopedia. While the blocking policy may be quite specific there is also non specific leeway for neutralising disruptive influences. That will be the focus of the debate. The only reason i say you may not need the RfC is that you may be less interested or have even changed your opinion. We'll see. ] ] 11:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: but i'll stick with the unwashed masses. ;) I really don't have a need for the tools and i sometimes find it is more effective in disputes to not have the admin tool. Sometimes being an admin can get in the way of a serious discussion (dispute). Speaking of which, i see you are in the cooler again? Take the time to heal or play with your RfC page. Don't spin wheels on this page too much, it wastes your time. ] ] 21:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::No, no, come on David. I '''know''' you could do it. I couldnt! Honestly, speaking as a person who does not like Admins genarally, I think you definitely have the temperament and good judgement to be one. I say this even after you have chastised me (but fairly). You couldnt have a stronger recommendation than from the the 'bad boy' of the Rds and WP generally!! Any way have a think about it. If you decide in favor I''ll back you all the way! You know it makes sense!! 8-))--] 22:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Am I really truly disruptive to WP? == | |||
| Well I have let this subject go about 5 or 6 six times in the past. The admin 'attacks on me' problem seems to be getting worse. What would you do in my shoes? Also, would you honsetly say I was disruptive to the encyclopedia. Ie preventing others from editing properly? | |||
| WP 'Blocking policy' defn of disruption | |||
| : | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| '''Disruption''': | |||
| A user may be blocked when their conduct severely disrupts the project — their conduct is inconsistent with a civil, collegial atmosphere and interferes with the process of editors working together harmoniously to create an encyclopedia. | |||
| Disagreements over content or policy are not disruption, but rather part of the normal functioning of Misplaced Pages and should be handled through dispute resolution procedures. ''Blocks for disruption should only be placed when a user is in some way making it difficult for others to contribute to Misplaced Pages.'' | |||
| Sysops may block IP addresses or usernames that disrupt the normal functioning of Misplaced Pages, or pose a sufficiently severe threat to it. Examples include (but are not limited to): | |||
| * Vandalism | |||
| * Excessive reverts (3RR) | |||
| * Inappropriate usernames | |||
| * Abusive sockpuppet accounts | |||
| * "Public" accounts, where the password is publicly available or shared with a large group | |||
| * Anonymous and open proxies | |||
| * Bots must have prior approval on Misplaced Pages:Bots/Requests for approval and may be blocked if an admin thinks they are malfunctioning in a damaging way | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| --] 11:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Those who ignored the instructions - please put your posts here == | |||
| '''Posts placed here may not recieve replies and may be deleted. Please do not complain afterwards. You have been told! 8-)''' | |||
| === Allowed section for freinds only === | |||
| *Placing posts here so they will be out of your way and you won't trip over them: ] ] ] ] ] ] ] the last of which which actually contains the description "Misplaced Pages - the website that “anyone can edit” that’s popular with teenagers and the unemployed." Regards. ] 16:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:35, 6 March 2020
Speedy deletion nomination of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Thomas Leach
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 21:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
File:TerribleSpelling.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TerribleSpelling.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
hi
Hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.209.3.170 (talk) 02:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
File:BadassBassBridge.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BadassBassBridge.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Axmouth02.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:BoundedPlate.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Musicians earplug.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Musicians earplug.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
File source problem with File:ComponentsCrop.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:ComponentsCrop.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 16:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
