| Revision as of 00:53, 23 November 2021 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,135,113 edits →ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:47, 26 November 2024 edit undo4Gramtops (talk | contribs)197 editsm Removed offensive language for talkTag: Manual revert | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| </table> | </table> | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1056563504 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1056563504 --> | ||
| == September 2022 == | |||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on others again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. '''''Please be civil in your comments'''''<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 18:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]] 20:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked as a sockpuppet == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ] as a sockpuppet of {{no ping|1=Jimi Henderson|label1=User:Jimi Henderson}} per the evidence presented at ]. Note that multiple accounts are ], but '''not for '']'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be ] or ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 11:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|reason=Ban Jimi Henderson for good. ] (]) 13:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that | |||
| *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <em>or</em> | |||
| *the block is no longer necessary because you | |||
| *#understand what you have been blocked for, | |||
| *#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and | |||
| *#will make useful contributions instead. | |||
| Please read the ] for more information. ] (]) 13:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed||decline= Your statement below is incoherent. Further inappropriate unblock requests and you may lose access to this page. ] (]) 19:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)}} | |||
| It's mistake, I will good.--] (]) 19:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:47, 26 November 2024
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
September 2022
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Patient Number 9, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please be civil in your comments - FlightTime (open channel) 18:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. freshacconci (✉) 20:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz 11:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Joey Camelaroche (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ban Jimi Henderson for good. Joey Camelaroche (talk) 13:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 13:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Joey Camelaroche (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Your statement below is incoherent. Further inappropriate unblock requests and you may lose access to this page. 331dot (talk) 19:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It's mistake, I will good.--Joey Camelaroche (talk) 19:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)