Misplaced Pages

There was no such thing as Palestinians: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:12, 23 November 2021 view sourceOnceinawhile (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers49,716 edits Interview: fix typos← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:04, 1 December 2024 view source Valenciano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,111 edits Following statements: "Later statements" reads better than "Following statements" 
(115 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Statement by Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir}}
{{Italic title}}
{{pp-30-500|small=yes}}
'''''There was no such thing as Palestinians''''' is the first line of a widely repeated statement by the then-newly appointed Israeli Prime Minister ] in an interview with ], then deputy editor of '']'' on June 15, 1969, to mark the second anniversary of the ]. It is considered to be the most famous example of Israeli denial of Palestinian identity.<ref name="Waxman 2006 p. 50">{{cite book | last=Waxman | first=D. | title=The Pursuit of Peace and the Crisis of Israeli Identity: Defending/Defining the Nation | publisher=Palgrave Macmillan US | year=2006 | isbn=978-1-4039-8347-3 | url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oUHIAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA50 | access-date=2021-11-22 | page=50}}</ref>
"'''There was no such thing as Palestinians'''" is part of a widely repeated statement by ], the then ], in her second month in office, made in an interview with ], then deputy editor of '']'' on June 15, 1969, to mark the second anniversary of the ].


The quote has been frequently used to illustrate Israel’s denial of Palestinian history, and is considered to sum up the Palestinians’ sense of victimization by Israel.<ref name="Gelvin Gelvin 2005 p. ">{{cite book | last=Gelvin | first=J.L. | last2=Gelvin | first2=P.H.J.L. | title=The Israel-Palestine Conflict: One Hundred Years of War | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2005 | isbn=978-0-521-85289-0 | url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wfIFVze1MqQC | access-date=2021-11-22 | page=92-93}}</ref> It is considered to be a successor to the early Zionist phrase '']''.<ref name="Parmenter 2010 p. 21">{{cite book | last=Parmenter | first=B.M.K. | title=Giving Voice to Stones: Place and Identity in Palestinian Literature | publisher=University of Texas Press | year=2010 | isbn=978-0-292-78795-7 | url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=NiHlAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA21 | access-date=2021-11-22 | page=21}}</ref> It is considered to be the most famous example of Israeli denial of a distinct ].<ref name=Waxman>{{cite book |last= Waxman |first= D. |title= The Pursuit of Peace and the Crisis of Israeli Identity: Defending/Defining the Nation |page= 50 |publisher= Palgrave Macmillan US |year= 2006 |isbn= 978-1-4039-8347-3 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=oUHIAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA50 |access-date= 2021-11-22 |quote= The denial of a separate and distinct Palestinian identity was most famously expressed in 1969 by then Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir when she stated: "There was no such thing as Palestinians. When was there an independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? ... It was not as though there was a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country from them. They did not exist." |archive-date= 2023-02-28 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230228184556/https://books.google.com/books?id=oUHIAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA50 |url-status= live }}</ref> The quote has been frequently used to illustrate Israel's denial of Palestinian history, and is considered to sum up the Palestinians' sense of victimization by Israel.<ref name=Gelvin>{{cite book |last1= Gelvin |first1= J.L. |last2= Gelvin |first2= P.H.J.L. |title= The Israel-Palestine Conflict: One Hundred Years of War |publisher= Cambridge University Press |pages= 92–93 |year= 2005 |isbn= 978-0-521-85289-0 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=wfIFVze1MqQC |access-date= 2021-11-22 |archive-date= 2021-12-14 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211214080142/https://books.google.com/books?id=wfIFVze1MqQC |url-status= live }}</ref> It is considered to be a successor to the early ] phrase "]",<ref name=Parmenter/> and a predecessor of the controversial 1984 book '']'' and the 2017 satire '']''.{{Cn|date=July 2024}}


] described it as Golda Meir's "most celebrated remark",<ref></ref> whilst ] wrote that "Meir’s jingoistic comments concerning Palestinians remain one of her defining – and most damning – legacies."<ref>Said, </ref> ], a ] professor and activist, asserted that it was Golda Meir's "most celebrated remark".<ref>{{Cite journal |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03064229808536356 |title=Fifty Years of Dispossession |date=1998 |doi=10.1080/03064229808536356 |access-date=2021-11-22 |archive-date=2021-11-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211123022217/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03064229808536356 |url-status=live |last1=Said |first1=Edward |journal=Index on Censorship |volume=27 |issue=3 |pages=76–82 }}</ref> ] journalist Alasdair Soussi wrote that "Meir's jingoistic comments concerning Palestinians remain one of her defining – and most damning – legacies."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Soussi |first1=Alasdir |title=The mixed legacy of Golda Meir, Israel's first female PM |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2019/3/18/the-mixed-legacy-of-golda-meir-israels-first-female-pm |access-date=30 August 2023 |work=] |date=2019-03-18 |archive-date=2021-11-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211123225312/https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2019/3/18/the-mixed-legacy-of-golda-meir-israels-first-female-pm |url-status=live }}</ref>


==Interview== ==Interviews==
===Initial statement===
The interview entitled ''Who can blame Israel'' was published in '']'' on June 15, 1969, and included the following exchange:
* Frank Giles: Do you think the emergence of the Palestinian fighting forces, the ], is an important new factor in the Middle East?
* Golda Meir: Important, no. A new factor, yes. '''There was no such thing as Palestinians'''. When was there an independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? It was either ] before the First World War and then it was a Palestine including Jordan. It was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country from them. They did not exist.<ref>{{cite news|author=Frank Giles|title = Golda Meir: 'Who can blame Israel'|newspaper=Sunday Times|date=June 15, 1969|page=12}}</ref>


===Later statements===
* Frank Giles: Do you think the emergence of the Palestinian fighting forces, the Fedayeen, is an important new factor in the Middle East?
In a 1970 interview with ]:


*Golda Meir: "When were Palestinians born? What was all of this area before the First World War when Britain got the ]? What was Palestine, then? Palestine was then the area between the Mediterranean and the Iraqian border. ] and West Bank was Palestine. I am a Palestinian, from 1921 and 1948, I carried a Palestinian passport. There was no such thing in this area as Jews, and Arabs, and Palestinians. There were Jews and Arabs.
* Golda Meir: Important, no. A new factor, yes. There was no such thing as Palestinians. When was there an independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? It was either southern Syria before the first world war and then it was a Palestine including Jordan. It was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country from them. They did not exist.<ref>{{cite news|author=Frank Giles|title = Golda Meir: 'Who can blame Israel'|newspaper=Sunday Times|date=June 15, 1969|page=12}}</ref>
*Interviewer: "You deny that there was a Palestine Arab people before, but there is now a Palestine liberation movement, and the history of liberation movements are that they grow, won't this one grow and become in the end in fact your biggest enemy?"
*Golda Meir: "I don't say there are no Palestinians, but I say there is no such thing as a distinct Palestinian people."<ref>"" (1970), in ''This Week'', Thames TV. 18:42</ref>


In a 1972 interview with the New York Times, Meir was asked if she stood by the comments; she replied: "I said there never was a Palestinian nation".<ref>New York Times, </ref> In a 1972 interview with '']'', Meir was asked if she stood by the comments; she replied: "I said there never was a Palestinian nation".<ref>New York Times, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211122201431/https://www.nytimes.com/1972/08/27/archives/a-talk-with-golda-meir.html |date=2021-11-22 }}</ref>


==Commentary==
Barbara McKean Parmenter reflected on the statement in its wider context:

<blockquote>In one sense she was right. There was no Palestine in the Western sense of a nation-state and no Palestinian people in the Western sense of a national group taking explicit possession of and improving its national territory. By Western definition, Palestinians, like many other native peoples around die world, did not exist.<ref name="Parmenter 2010 p. 21">{{cite book | last=Parmenter | first=B.M.K. | title=Giving Voice to Stones: Place and Identity in Palestinian Literature | publisher=University of Texas Press | year=2010 | isbn=978-0-292-78795-7 | url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=NiHlAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA21 | access-date=2021-11-22 | page=21}}</ref></blockquote>
Palestinian jurist ] reflected on the statement in 1988:
<blockquote>The obliteration of the history of Palestine is now attempted by deformation of historical facts. Zionist apologists have reached a new stage in deceit by suggesting that not only the Palestinians did not exist in Palestine, but that Palestine was essentially 'uninhabited' by Arabs before the Zionist movement began towards the end of the nineteenth century, and that the Arabs came in large numbers after that, from nearby countries, drawn by the economic benefits of Jewish settlements.<ref>{{cite book |last= Cattan |first= Henry |title=The Palestine Question |page= 21 |publisher= Taylor & Francis |year= 2022|isbn= 9781000737509 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=lqWTEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT198 |access-date= 2023-08-11}}</ref></blockquote>

], an American scholar on Middle Eastern history, commented in 2005:
<blockquote>The fact that Palestinian nationalism developed later than Zionism and indeed in response to it does not in any way diminish the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism or make it less valid than Zionism. All nationalisms arise in opposition to some "other." Why else would there be the need to specify who you are? And all nationalisms are defined by what they oppose. As we have seen, Zionism itself arose in reaction to anti-Semitic and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe. It would be perverse to judge Zionism as somehow less valid than European anti-Semitism or those nationalisms. Furthermore, Zionism itself was also defined by its opposition to the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants of the region. Both the "conquest of land" and the "]" slogans that became central to the dominant strain of Zionism in the Yishuv originated as a result of the Zionist confrontation with the Palestinian "other."<ref name=Gelvin/></blockquote>

] wrote in 2013 about the remark:
<blockquote>Of course, 100 years ago there was no such thing as an Israeli either. The "Israeli" and "Palestinian" nations have come into being simultaneously, and in conflict. The assertion of one is often formulated as the denial of the other."<ref name="Ceallaigh 2013">{{cite news | last=Ceallaigh | first=Philip O | title=The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: 'no such thing as a Palestinian' | newspaper=The Irish Times | date=2013-03-21 | url=https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/the-hundred-years-war-on-palestine-no-such-thing-as-a-palestinian-1.4161695 | access-date=2022-04-14 | archive-date=2023-08-28 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230828082435/https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/the-hundred-years-war-on-palestine-no-such-thing-as-a-palestinian-1.4161695 | url-status=live }}</ref></blockquote>

Barbara McKean Parmenter, a literary critic, reflected in 2010 on the statement:
<blockquote>In one sense she was right. There was no Palestine in the Western sense of a nation-state and no Palestinian people in the Western sense of a national group taking explicit possession of and improving its national territory. By Western definition, Palestinians, like many other native peoples around the world, did not exist.<ref name=Parmenter>{{cite book |last= Parmenter |first= B.M.K. |title= Giving Voice to Stones: Place and Identity in Palestinian Literature |page= 21 |publisher= University of Texas Press |year= 2010 |isbn= 978-0-292-78795-7 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=NiHlAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA21 |access-date= 2021-11-22 |archive-date= 2021-12-14 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20211214080142/https://books.google.com/books?id=NiHlAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA21 |url-status= live }}</ref></blockquote>

], then head of the ], wrote in 2009 about the quote:
<blockquote>The complete response makes it clear that Meir was talking not about the existence of Palestinians as individuals or even as a group, but the existence of a Palestinians ''nation''. And she was stating a simple fact - that prior to the late 1960s no one, least of all the other Arab nations, had recognized the existence or even the potential existence of such a nation. ... Could Meir have made her point more clearly? Probably. And she paid dearly for her lack of clarity. Over the years, her words have repeatedly been cited by anti-Zionists (and sometimes by outright anti-Semites) to "demonstrate" the dismissiveness of Israeli leaders toward the ]."<ref name="Foxman 2007">{{cite book |last=Foxman |first=Abraham H. |author-link=Abraham Foxman |title=The Deadliest Lies Place The Israel Lobby and the Myth of Jewish Control |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |publication-place=New York |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-230-60974-7 |oclc=228143383 |pages=–}}</ref></blockquote>

==See also==
* ]
* '']''


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}

{{Falsification of history}}


] ]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]

]
==References==
]
{{reflist}}
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 22:04, 1 December 2024

Statement by Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir

"There was no such thing as Palestinians" is part of a widely repeated statement by Golda Meir, the then Israeli Prime Minister, in her second month in office, made in an interview with Frank Giles, then deputy editor of The Sunday Times on June 15, 1969, to mark the second anniversary of the Six-Day War.

It is considered to be the most famous example of Israeli denial of a distinct Palestinian identity. The quote has been frequently used to illustrate Israel's denial of Palestinian history, and is considered to sum up the Palestinians' sense of victimization by Israel. It is considered to be a successor to the early Christian Zionist phrase "A land without a people for a people without a land", and a predecessor of the controversial 1984 book From Time Immemorial and the 2017 satire A History of the Palestinian People.

Edward Said, a Palestinian American professor and activist, asserted that it was Golda Meir's "most celebrated remark". Al Jazeera journalist Alasdair Soussi wrote that "Meir's jingoistic comments concerning Palestinians remain one of her defining – and most damning – legacies."

Interviews

Initial statement

The interview entitled Who can blame Israel was published in The Sunday Times on June 15, 1969, and included the following exchange:

  • Frank Giles: Do you think the emergence of the Palestinian fighting forces, the Fedayeen, is an important new factor in the Middle East?
  • Golda Meir: Important, no. A new factor, yes. There was no such thing as Palestinians. When was there an independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? It was either southern Syria before the First World War and then it was a Palestine including Jordan. It was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country from them. They did not exist.

Later statements

In a 1970 interview with Thames TV:

  • Golda Meir: "When were Palestinians born? What was all of this area before the First World War when Britain got the Mandate over Palestine? What was Palestine, then? Palestine was then the area between the Mediterranean and the Iraqian border. East and West Bank was Palestine. I am a Palestinian, from 1921 and 1948, I carried a Palestinian passport. There was no such thing in this area as Jews, and Arabs, and Palestinians. There were Jews and Arabs.
  • Interviewer: "You deny that there was a Palestine Arab people before, but there is now a Palestine liberation movement, and the history of liberation movements are that they grow, won't this one grow and become in the end in fact your biggest enemy?"
  • Golda Meir: "I don't say there are no Palestinians, but I say there is no such thing as a distinct Palestinian people."

In a 1972 interview with The New York Times, Meir was asked if she stood by the comments; she replied: "I said there never was a Palestinian nation".

Commentary

Palestinian jurist Henry Cattan reflected on the statement in 1988:

The obliteration of the history of Palestine is now attempted by deformation of historical facts. Zionist apologists have reached a new stage in deceit by suggesting that not only the Palestinians did not exist in Palestine, but that Palestine was essentially 'uninhabited' by Arabs before the Zionist movement began towards the end of the nineteenth century, and that the Arabs came in large numbers after that, from nearby countries, drawn by the economic benefits of Jewish settlements.

James Gelvin, an American scholar on Middle Eastern history, commented in 2005:

The fact that Palestinian nationalism developed later than Zionism and indeed in response to it does not in any way diminish the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism or make it less valid than Zionism. All nationalisms arise in opposition to some "other." Why else would there be the need to specify who you are? And all nationalisms are defined by what they oppose. As we have seen, Zionism itself arose in reaction to anti-Semitic and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe. It would be perverse to judge Zionism as somehow less valid than European anti-Semitism or those nationalisms. Furthermore, Zionism itself was also defined by its opposition to the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants of the region. Both the "conquest of land" and the "conquest of labor" slogans that became central to the dominant strain of Zionism in the Yishuv originated as a result of the Zionist confrontation with the Palestinian "other."

Philip Ó Ceallaigh wrote in 2013 about the remark:

Of course, 100 years ago there was no such thing as an Israeli either. The "Israeli" and "Palestinian" nations have come into being simultaneously, and in conflict. The assertion of one is often formulated as the denial of the other."

Barbara McKean Parmenter, a literary critic, reflected in 2010 on the statement:

In one sense she was right. There was no Palestine in the Western sense of a nation-state and no Palestinian people in the Western sense of a national group taking explicit possession of and improving its national territory. By Western definition, Palestinians, like many other native peoples around the world, did not exist.

Abraham Foxman, then head of the Anti-Defamation League, wrote in 2009 about the quote:

The complete response makes it clear that Meir was talking not about the existence of Palestinians as individuals or even as a group, but the existence of a Palestinians nation. And she was stating a simple fact - that prior to the late 1960s no one, least of all the other Arab nations, had recognized the existence or even the potential existence of such a nation. ... Could Meir have made her point more clearly? Probably. And she paid dearly for her lack of clarity. Over the years, her words have repeatedly been cited by anti-Zionists (and sometimes by outright anti-Semites) to "demonstrate" the dismissiveness of Israeli leaders toward the Palestinian People."

See also

References

  1. Waxman, D. (2006). The Pursuit of Peace and the Crisis of Israeli Identity: Defending/Defining the Nation. Palgrave Macmillan US. p. 50. ISBN 978-1-4039-8347-3. Archived from the original on 2023-02-28. Retrieved 2021-11-22. The denial of a separate and distinct Palestinian identity was most famously expressed in 1969 by then Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir when she stated: "There was no such thing as Palestinians. When was there an independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? ... It was not as though there was a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country from them. They did not exist."
  2. ^ Gelvin, J.L.; Gelvin, P.H.J.L. (2005). The Israel-Palestine Conflict: One Hundred Years of War. Cambridge University Press. pp. 92–93. ISBN 978-0-521-85289-0. Archived from the original on 2021-12-14. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  3. ^ Parmenter, B.M.K. (2010). Giving Voice to Stones: Place and Identity in Palestinian Literature. University of Texas Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-292-78795-7. Archived from the original on 2021-12-14. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  4. Said, Edward (1998). "Fifty Years of Dispossession". Index on Censorship. 27 (3): 76–82. doi:10.1080/03064229808536356. Archived from the original on 2021-11-23. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  5. Soussi, Alasdir (2019-03-18). "The mixed legacy of Golda Meir, Israel's first female PM". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 2021-11-23. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  6. Frank Giles (June 15, 1969). "Golda Meir: 'Who can blame Israel'". Sunday Times. p. 12.
  7. "Iron Lady of Israeli politics" (1970), in This Week, Thames TV. 18:42
  8. New York Times, A talk with Golda Meir Aug. 27, 1972 Archived 2021-11-22 at the Wayback Machine
  9. Cattan, Henry (2022). The Palestine Question. Taylor & Francis. p. 21. ISBN 9781000737509. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  10. Ceallaigh, Philip O (2013-03-21). "The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: 'no such thing as a Palestinian'". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 2023-08-28. Retrieved 2022-04-14.
  11. Foxman, Abraham H. (2007). The Deadliest Lies Place The Israel Lobby and the Myth of Jewish Control. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 5758. ISBN 978-0-230-60974-7. OCLC 228143383.
Historical negationism
Genocide denial /
denial of mass killings
and atrocities
Holocaust
Other whitewashing
of governments
Other manifestations
Azerbaijan
Germany
Israel / Palestine
Russia
Turkey
United States
Organizations
Publications
Conferences
Publishing houses
Legal status
Statute law
Case law
International law
Related
Categories: