| Revision as of 04:09, 23 November 2021 view sourceEzlev (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,650 edits add reason to tagTag: Visual edit← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:12, 23 October 2024 view source Jlwoodwa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,960 edits Add categorization templates (via redirect-helper) |
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{pp-30-500|small=yes}} |
|
|
{{Cleanup rewrite|date=November 2021|the ACPR proposal is barely notable, and the Isocracy one is non-notable, but this term is notable because of its use in media and academia (see also "no-state solution")}} |
|
|
{{Israel-Palestinian peace process}} |
|
|
In the context of the ], a '''zero-state solution''', based on a proposal by the {{ill|Ariel Center for Policy Research|he|מרכז אריאל למחקרי מדיניות}} (ACPR), assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the ] in the ] should get "restoration of ]ian ]" while Egypt should have responsibility for the ]. ] thus has no reason to agree to assimilate them or provide them with a state, since they were part of those countries until their territory was captured in the 1967 ]. This proposal is very similar to the ] advocated by some commentators. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
A very different alternative interpretation of a 'zero-state solution' has been presented by the ] Network, a few years prior to the ACPR proposal.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://isocracy.org/content/country-palestine-zero-state-solution |title= The Country of Palestine: A Zero State Solution|first=Lev|last=Lafayette|date=10 July 2010|publisher=|via=isocracy.org}}</ref> This anarchist perspective is more similar to the ], with the exception that instead of priorities of States, the concrete and visceral rights of individuals are given priority. The Isocracy 'zero-state solution' argues that the oft-suggested ] is not a plausible option, 'there is next to no chance that the half million Israeli settlers are going to move from East Jerusalem or the West Bank. There is next to no chance that a Palestinian state without contiguous borders would ever be viable.' |
|
|
|
{{R with history}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R with Wikidata item}} |
|
==Overview (ACPR) == |
|
|
|
}} |
|
The approach generally assumes that Israel will expand to fill the ] in 1967. Specific proposals differ as whether the present Palestinians can remain where they are, as non-citizens of Israel, or are expected to return to the territory of their national identity. |
|
|
|
|
|
There has been opposition to this plan from Palestinians, Jordanians and Egyptians.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/world/middleeast/12egypt.html|title=Gaza Crisis Imperils 2-State Solution|first=Michael|last=Slackman|date=16 December 2017|publisher=|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
The proposal by ACPR, the "Framework Proposal for a National Strategy Regarding Judea and Samaria and the Issue of Eretz Israel Arabs", describes an objective of "Consolidating a political proposal with the intention of halting Israel's defeatist campaign that is manifest in its most extreme form in the conduct of the Olmert Government". It assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the Palestinians in the West Bank should get "restoration of Jordanian citizenship" while Egypt should have responsibility for the Gaza Strip. It proposes a unilateral solution because it does not believe ] will accept: |
|
|
|
|
|
* Extending Israeli sovereignty over the ] |
|
|
* "] is ]" and restoration of Jordanian citizenship to the Arabs in Judea and Samaria |
|
|
* Municipal autonomy for the Arabs of Judea and Samaria (on the basis of the Camp David Accords) accompanied by a total disarmament of the autonomous areas |
|
|
* The areas of Arab settlements located on private property (the Mosaic Program by Dr. Yuval Arnon Ohanna) |
|
|
* Military liquidation of the military infrastructure in Gaza and according responsibility for the area to Egypt |
|
|
* ]: Equal rights in exchange for equal obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
==Overview (Isocracy) == |
|
|
Whereas the ACPR proposal essentially means one state for Israel, zero states for the Palestinians, the argument from the Isocracy Network is the abolition of States in general. In this particular context it argues that all individuals in the country of historic ] are deserving of equal rights and liberties regardless of the governing authority that they live under. Specifically, the Isocracy version of the "Zero-State" solution argues that: |
|
|
|
|
|
* Governance would be secular and democratic. |
|
|
* There would be no special benefits on the basis of nationalities, real or imagined, or religious affiliation that were separate from the rights of all citizens. |
|
|
* The region would be a Jewish homeland, rather than a Jewish state (as with any other religion). |
|
|
* Land would be held as a public good without discrimination in leasing rights. |
|
|
* There would be no standing armies, only reserve militia and emergency services for the purpose of local defense and civil order, not invasive war. |
|
|
|
|
|
== See also == |
|
|
|
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
| ⚫ |
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
{{Reflist}} |
|
|
{{Citizendium}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==External links== |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|