Misplaced Pages

User talk:Throast: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:26, 23 November 2021 editThroast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,943 edits →Please help: comment← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:51, 10 August 2024 edit undoThroast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,943 edits →Helmuth Nyborg and far-right: re 
(429 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NoACEMM}}
== Poster ==
{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 75K
|counter = 3
|minthreadsleft = 10
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = User talk:Throast/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Talk header|disclaimer=yes}}
{{Notice|image=Antu emblem-important.svg|If you came here to inquire about why I ] one of your edits, please read my ] and any '''links''' to relevant ], or talk page discussions provided ''first''. Any message that clearly neglects my edit summary '''will ''not'' be answered'''.}}
{{Ds/aware|blp}}


== Happy New Year, Throast! ==
Hi there. I don't know why you think the file you uploaded has the correct saturation and if its contrast were changed, it would look like . shows a different and clearly worse version than the two files here, but the others, including the original film website (archived ) and IMP Awards show that the png version is the correct one. Have a nice day. ] 19:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
:And do you know what happened to the image that was there before you replaced it with yours? ] (]) 20:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
]]
::Yes, it was deleted per ]. You might find it archived on the though. ] 20:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Paragraph break}}
:::I see. I'd like to add that your argument doesn't disprove mine. Warner Bros. could have just as well used an altered version, so can IMP Awards. Per my argument, the image I added can only be the original one when it is compared to yours because more detail is retained. ] (]) 20:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}}
::::Well, maybe we should discuss this further on the film's talk page then, see how other editors think. I personally believe that the original site, which was active during the film's theatrical release, is sufficient as a source and should be considered the best source unless proven otherwise. ] 20:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
'''Throast''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
:::::I honestly didn't expect you to bring up the original film website. :D So you do have the upper hand here. I don't think setting up a discussion on the talk page is worth the hassle. I appreciate the civil discourse. Cheers ] (]) 14:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
<br />] (]) 15:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)<br /><br />
</div>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> ] (]) 15:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
:{{u|Abishe}}, what a pleasant surprise. I wish you a Happy New Year as well! ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 15:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

== "Distributor" or "Presented by" ==

Would you like to take a look at ] and ]? If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. ] (]) 18:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

:Also there's another ]. ] (]) 11:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
::I'm not too familiar with track list conventions, so I don't think I'm going to chime in. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 15:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! == == A barnstar for you! ==


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar'''
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Here's a barnstar for you to enjoy. I am impressed by how you cleaned up the article on the ] and did such a good job with the cleanup and condensing information. ] (]) 19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Great moves, keep it up, proud of you ] (]) 05:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
|} |}
:Oh my gosh, thank you! ] (]) 00:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

==New message from Emir of Misplaced Pages==
{{talkback|User talk:Emir of Misplaced Pages|Nationality of David Dobrik|ts=18:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)}}
] (]) 18:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

== Question ==

I apologize in advance for writing here (I don’t know if I’m supposed to T_T) but Misplaced Pages is so confusing at first and I’m still trying to figure it out…
First of all, thanks for the feedback on the Gabbie Hanna edit!! It’s incredibly appreciated cause, again, I’m new and I still have to get the knack of it.
Secondly, I think your comment might have been probably directed at the controversies section – because the rest of the things I added were largely updates of stuff that was already up on there – and I do want to try to explain myself (obviously, if it is contrast with Misplaced Pages’s guidelines, I won’t put it anymore!!).
Preface: Gabbie Hanna is one of my favorite singers lol.
Her second EP, Bad Karma, is a response to all her past controversies and deals with basically everything that she has gone through from 2019 to 2021. But you cannot grasp the full scope of the EP without a background of her controversies, cause without context it largely does not make sense. (example: the song Special is about her controversy with Smiles, drama channels, Paytas and Kenza. Call Me Crazy is about Paytas. Etc.)
Still, I would appreciate a lot a response and some suggestions on how I should write/do edits next time!!
Thanks in advance!! ] (]) 22:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
:I totally understand, I've been on here for eight years and it's still confusing to me. I left you a response on your talk page. ] (]) 22:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Would you mind going through my changes for Gabbie Hanna's article and telling me the specific things that were wrong? I just created a page for her upcoming debut album and I want to add it in her own article but at this point I'm afraid whatever I will write will be reverted lol
Also, I spent a lot of time on that article and gathered all the references so if possible I would like to salvage as much as possible and keep all the things that were good/relevant. Thanks in advance] (]) 08:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
:], I'm afraid ] will likely be deleted as it clearly violates ] and ]. Before you edit, let alone create, any more articles, ''please'' get yourself acquainted with Misplaced Pages's policies!

:When I reverted your first batch of edits to the Gabbie Hanna article , I left an edit summary citing some policies which I further explained on your talk page.

:''PLEASE'' check out ''']''' before making any further edits and read through the policies I linked to in my edit summary, your talk page etc. If you need any further guidance, go to the ] to get in touch with experienced editors. ] (]) 09:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the heads up!! I understand if you will delete it, sorry again.

One thing that I would like to point out tho is that Youtubers who make music rarely get independent coverage, even her 2 released work have gotten 2 or 3 articles at best, so while I do understand wikipedia's policy and the need to enforce it, it's hard when people just don't give coverage to the person you're trying to write an article about.
:], notability is what it's all about. If there's no significant coverage by reliable independent secondary sources on the subject (plus some additional criteria depending on the subject), there should be no article on Misplaced Pages. Perhaps Gabbie Hanna has her own Fandom or other fan based forums where you can contribute. If you want to continue editing here, I hope you take my advice to heart. Cheers! ] (]) 09:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

==]==

The youtube video doesn't appear to be under a free license. Is there something I'm missing?] (]) 04:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
:] You're right, I thought I'd checked for it but must have confused it with another YouTube video. Sorry for the inconvenience. ] (]) 10:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

== ] podcast interview ==

I note that you follow the article about ]. I added a link to a podcast interview on the theory that it might be of interest to readers wanting to learn more about her, did you manage to watch it? - ] (]) 14:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
:{{reply to|Scott Sanchez}} The hosts of the podcast are biased towards her as evident by the support they show her at points throughout the episode. I don't think the source is neutral enough to include as prominently in the external links section. ] (] &#124; ]) 13:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

== Revert ==

Just letting you know that you reverted my edit but all I did was fix the citation template, so the Hollywood Reporter citation and whatever problems there were with the link are still there but not in a cite template properly. Not sure if it should be removed or just needs a link fixing or something so I'll leave it to you but thought you should know. ] (]) 17:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

:Oh never mind, I see you already realised haha. ] (]) 17:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|Alduin2000}} Thanks anyway for letting me know here, in case I hadn't realized. Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for fixing the citation template. ] (] &#124; ]) 17:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

== Hi dear user ==

I found to be over the top, please correct me if i'm wrong but, all the sources i put are reliable and numerous. What's undue about what i wrote?--] (]) 14:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

You removed credits, wikilinks, well sourced encyclopedic informations for what? I'm really not getting it--] (]) 14:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|Hotbox eron}} Please take a look at ], ], ], and ], policies which, in my opinion, your edits are in conflict with. Going into strenuous detail about one particular song, unreleased at that, is a good example of undue content. This article is about the album as a whole. It would be excessive to dissect every single song on the album. Also, YouTube videos as sources are generally inferior compared to articles published by reputable publications in my opinion. You state that other journalists are included but Charlamagne tha God is neither a journalist nor a music critic, he is a radio host. His opinion on the album might be included but before you add it, I would recommend you to seek consensus for it on the article talk first, as his off the cuff remarks are in contrast with the written reviews by music critics for reputable publications that are otherwise featured in the "critical reception" section. ] (] &#124; ]) 15:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
::Thank you. I understand your point now, I'll fix my edit--] (]) 16:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Hotbox eron}} There are still ] issues in your edit and you did not explain the removal of cited content in the "critical reception" section. The keyboarders who worked on the track "Hurricane" are already credited in the "personnel" section and do not belong in the "producer" column of the table. I will address your edit but please refrain from reverting back to your version. Instead of ], seek consensus on the talk if you disagree. ] (] &#124; ]) 16:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

== ''Donda'' ==

I was not starting an edit war, as only one edit was reverted and I won't readd the content since I now understand why it's redundant so no talk page debate is required. --] 07:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|Kyle Peake}} Hey, sorry for the late response. An edit war is not always started in bad faith and I can see that we are both trying to improve the article. An edit war is started once an editor reverts back to their preferred version after they have already been reverted. Hence, the editor introducing the disputed edit is supposed to then seek consensus for their edit once they have been reverted. Thank you for understanding. ] (] &#124; ]) 09:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
::I am aware of the faith guideline about edit warring, but I thought it only counted as warring if you reverted more than once? If I was still in disagreement with you about this actual content for instance, I would have posted on the ''Donda'' talk page. --] 15:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Kyle Peake}} You might be referring to the ], which is merely a "bright-line rule" that, if broken, can lead to a block. Edit warring describes a general pattern of behavior which I described above. The 3RR is there to deal with particularly bad cases of edit warring. Anyway, this was just supposed to be a clarification, I understand that the issue is settled now. ] (] &#124; ]) 16:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

== Wrong Website Under “About” ==

Wrong website or no website shows up when Nicki Minaj name is Googled every few days. It’ll show the the correct site under “About” when Nicki Minaj name is Googled, then disappears or shows an inactive website (mypinkfriday.com) a few days later.

Who keeps removing her correct website under “About” when her name is Googled? It’s being done by someone here. I believe it’s you, Throat. ] (]) 02:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|Rvaughn21}} What are you even talking about? Google knowledge panels have nothing to do with Misplaced Pages. Why would you bring that up here, let alone accuse me without any evidence? ] (] &#124; ]) 11:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

== Pending changes reviewer granted ==

]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|pending changes reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to ] on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at ], while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at ].

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

''See also:''
*], the guideline on reviewing
*], the summary of the use of pending changes
*], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.<!-- Template:Pending changes reviewer granted --> <br>
] (]) 13:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

:Hi Throast, congrats on being granted the right, looking through some of your accepts, here are some minor mistakes I found:
:] Spacing needs to be corrected before accepting
:] I'm not 100% sure about this one but editor claimed the king was "Michael Gurguis" although ] seems to contradict that (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here)
:Please note that none of these violates any of the guidelines in ], but it's best to correct mistakes before accepting. Thanks for keeping the backlog down for (looking at ]) quite some time and have fun reviewing changes :D ]]] 17:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|Justiyaya}} Thank you very much for notifying me, it's my first day as a reviewer and I'm currently working on getting a handle on it. How do I correct an edit before I accept it? Or am I supposed to accept first and then immediately correct manually? ] (] &#124; ]) 17:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
:::Oh, if you edit the page, before you publish it, next the minor edit box there is an accept all pending edits option which you can click on, if you choose not to select that option, your edit will be published without being accepted. ]]] 17:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
::::You might find the ] useful if you want to test stuff out but you seem to have most figured out already. ]]] 17:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Justiyaya}} Got it. For some reason it didn't occur to me that I can just edit the page when looking at the diff. Thank you. ] (] &#124; ]) 17:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
::::::Welcome :D ]]] 17:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

==Pending changes note to self==
On October 5 at 17:38 UTC, I meant to revert instead of as vandalism. For some reason, perhaps due to another user simultaneously trying to revert that edit, mine was overridden. I am aware that the edit I accidentally reverted does not count as vandalism, though I can't undo it now unfortunately. ] (] &#124; ]) 17:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

:Looking at the history of the article, no damage appears to have been done :D
:I would've probably ] too, just with a different edit summary
:You have gained a {{talk page watcher}} ]]] 18:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

== H3h3 productions revert ==

Hey I saw you reverted two of my edits. The one about the description, I would describe them more as a YouTube duo than a channel (singular) as they have multiple channels covering multiple topics. And their more active channel is not h3h3hproductions. And my other edit was about the speculation of why the viewership surged, even if the source said it, it doesn't mean it's the objective truth, which is why I think it should be reverted. Thanks. ] (]) 23:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|Perfecnot}} The title of the article is "h3h3productions", which clearly suggests that the article is about this specific channel. The lead supports this by saying {{tq|h3h3productions is a YouTube channel...|q=yes}}, hence "YouTube channel" is the most accurate description. The article title is not "Ethan and Hila Klein", in which case the short description you've proposed might be more fitting.
:Regarding the sourced content you removed as "speculation": One of Misplaced Pages's key principles is that ], which you might want to read up on. As I stated in my edit summary, the claim you removed is very much verified by the source. Thank you. ] (] &#124; ]) 23:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
::Would the H3 Podcast (Their main channel now) be deserving of a blurb then? They are ranked like top 20 podcasts in America by viewership. ] (]) 00:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Perfecnot}} No. If you believe the podcast meets standalone notability, you might as well create a new article. The article as it stands now is about the YouTube channel "h3h3productions". ] (] &#124; ]) 00:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
::::Yeah I just looked up what a blurb was, I meant an article. My bad ] (]) 00:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
::Glad we came to a consensus regarding the article :) ] (]) 18:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Perfecnot}} Yeah 👍 ] (] &#124; ]) 18:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

== Pending changes reviewer granted ==

]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|pending changes reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to ] on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at ], while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at ].

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.


== Gorillaz/Hardcastle ==
''See also:''
*], the guideline on reviewing
*], the summary of the use of pending changes
*], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.<!-- Template:Pending changes reviewer granted --> <br>
] (]) 13:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
:Congrats :D ]]] 14:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|Justiyaya}} Thanks! ] (] &#124; ]) 16:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


In regards to the revisions to ] - what's the difference in how he's still attributed as an artist on ], but can't be on his own page? ] (]) 23:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
:You cited a Fandom article, which features ] and ]. Neither of these sources can be used in this case because they are ]. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 00:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)


== KavKav ==
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


I applaud you for your continued commitment to the truth. I am so sorry that a particular someone has been threatening and shit-talking you for doing your job. I support you and I love you <3 ] (]) 18:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


==Kanye West edit requests==
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
Hi, I know I'm going out on a limb here by just asking you to let me edit Kanye's Misplaced Pages article. But I've noticed that the people in charge on editing have left out a lot of information in the sections about 2016, which was a pivotal moment in his life. If we can work together to come to an agreement then that'd be great. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
:Hey {{u|Tronfa}}, nobody is in charge of any article on Misplaced Pages. It so happens that some editors who probably have the article on their watchlist are more willing to respond to edit requests than others. That said, if you'd like to add anything specific to the article and don't yet have the necessary user rights to edit it directly, feel free to make a request on ] following the steps ] and using ]. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 23:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->


== Being paid by h3 podcast == == Kevin Campbell ==


Hi
It is not legal for you to vandalize my page because you are being paid by Ethan Klein and h3. Please cease ] (]) 07:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
I edited and removed information on Kevin Campbells Misplaced Pages page because a. It was untrue and gives a false impression of the relationship with Mark Morrison and b. There was no court injunction or dispute with Mark Morrison. I know this as a fact because I was in the room with both Kevin and Mark at that time advising them both. I would be grateful if you would remove once again that which I edited. Thank you. Robert ] (]) 15:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
:Hello, I advise you refrain from editing any articles on Misplaced Pages about subjects you have personal or professional relationships with as this presents a ]. The information you removed seems to be supported by ]. I suggest raising the issue on the article talk page using {{tl|Edit COI}} and providing independent reliable sources to support your claim. Note that these sources need to be ''published''; your own testimony does not count as a reliable source. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 16:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)


== Please help == ==Helmuth Nyborg and far-right==


Hi, I have significantly updated the ] article with reliable sources . I believe that "far-right" is warranted for a description in the lead. Would you agree with this? ] (]) 19:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
This person is vandalizing my page for money ] (]) 07:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
:I've responded on the article talk page. Please consider the compromise made by the other IP. Also, while acknowledging that you were not the instigator, I ask you to refrain from ]. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 20:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
::Could you please give your opinion about the latest attempt to add the "far-right politician" label in the article's first sentence? On the talk page, we seemed to agree for a while that the wording I proposed here was the best summary, but now there is another attempt to restore the 51.6.193.169 IP's original change. ] (]) 16:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
:::The label should not be included pending consensus, so feel free to remove it for that reason. I've stated that I'm opposed to the "far-right" label in the lead sentence and have proposed a compromise which nobody (neither IP nor other participants) have commented on. However, I don't feel passionate either way and will probably not comment any further. If editors keep restoring the label without discussion, ] might be the way forward. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 18:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
::::As I said on the article talk page, I think additional RFCs or noticeboard threads would not be appropriate after the existing noticeboard thread already failed to make a consensus for inclusion. Of the two people who came to that article from the fringe theories noticeboard, there is one (you) who opposes including it in the first sentence, and one (Joe Roe) who thinks it should be mentioned in the lead section, but also supported my proposed compromise. But I also think I shouldn't revert the additions more than three times, even though BLP issues are an exception to the three-revert rule. My next revert will be my third in about 24hrs. Can you suggest any other solutions, if the material in the first sentence keeps being restored after I next remove it? ] (]) 04:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::You should try hashing it out with {{u|Generalrelative}} first. They've interpreted my "bottom up" comment to be about the "far-right" label, which it was not, so there seems to be major confusion/miscommunication there. The label is clearly contentious, and a single editor's judgment should not override the discussion on the talk page. If it gets restored again, I suggest requesting ] (of the version without the "far-right" label in the lead sentence) at ] pending consensus. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 08:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::Do you still think reverting again and then requesting page protection is the right solution? The user now restoring the material in the first sentence is the same one who added it there recently. It looks to me like someone also is using a blatant sock puppet to try to poison the well for undoing this change, and I'm not sure what's the correct way to react to that. ] (]) 22:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::I suggest requesting full page protection and ''briefly'' describing the content dispute + linking the version ''without'' the disputed content. That way, an admin can decide the appropriate course of action, and you're in the clear regarding reverts. However, looking at how the talk page discussion is developing, consensus seems to be turning against you. If your RFPP is declined, which it very well might be, I strongly recommend moving on from the article altogether. ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 07:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)


==166 Medium Regiment (India)==
Please stop vandalizing my page you’ve removed everything I actually did positive for 20 years and replaced it with paid negative content from h3 which is all false. Why would you do that? You erased 20 years of my life and instead added in one month and made it skewed highly negative please help? ] (]) 16:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
I have restored the version of the article ] before editing by {{noping|ODSTsog}}. As far as I could see, edits made by other editors, including you, during the period when ODSTsog was active, were essentially reverts of ODSTsog's editing, rather than substantially new edits, but if I have inadvertently undone significant contributions of yours then please accept my apology, and, of course, restore the contributions. ] (]) 20:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Knightedblog0934}} I am not vandalizing "your" page. I have also not replaced anything. I've improved the sourcing and struck unsourced or poorly sourced information, as well as information serving a promotional purpose, entirely in line with Misplaced Pages policy. You need to stop creating sockpuppet accounts. Your primary account ] has been blocked for making legal threats against editors like me. ] (] &#124; ]) 16:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
:{{u|JBW}}, that's perfectly fine, I would have done the same had I looked at the edit history. I think one of these edits popped up at recent changes, and I reverted without looking into it further. Thanks! ] <sup style="font-size:.7em; line-height:1.5em;"><nowiki>{</nowiki><nowiki>{</nowiki>ping<nowiki>}}</nowiki> me!</sup> (] &#124; ]) 20:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
==] ==
Hi ]. In the recent discussion about "Release history" table, Andrew318 said that those are distributors, not labels. So if you have any further comments. Regards. ] (]) 10:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:51, 10 August 2024


This is Throast's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
If you came here to inquire about why I reverted one of your edits, please read my edit summary and any links to relevant policies, guidelines, or talk page discussions provided first. Any message that clearly neglects my edit summary will not be answered.
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Happy New Year, Throast!

Happy New Year!

Throast,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
Abishe (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Abishe, what a pleasant surprise. I wish you a Happy New Year as well! Throast (talk | contribs) 15:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

"Distributor" or "Presented by"

Would you like to take a look at Template talk:Infobox film#‎Should we change "Distributor" to "Presented by"? and Talk:Mission: Impossible – Fallout#Production company/Distributor? If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. 2001:D08:2900:B820:17AC:6FB2:C5DE:206A (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Also there's another recent discussion for track listing template. 2001:D08:2910:B7EF:17AC:F77F:AFB:708D (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm not too familiar with track list conventions, so I don't think I'm going to chime in. Throast (talk | contribs) 15:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Great moves, keep it up, proud of you Itzybella8 (talk) 05:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Gorillaz/Hardcastle

In regards to the revisions to Lee Hardcastle - what's the difference in how he's still attributed as an artist on Tranz, but can't be on his own page? 24.125.26.243 (talk) 23:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

You cited a Fandom article, which features user-generated content and WP:FACEBOOK. Neither of these sources can be used in this case because they are unreliable. Throast (talk | contribs) 00:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

KavKav

I applaud you for your continued commitment to the truth. I am so sorry that a particular someone has been threatening and shit-talking you for doing your job. I support you and I love you <3 2605:A601:A9E2:E000:CC63:43A7:EAB9:364D (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Kanye West edit requests

Hi, I know I'm going out on a limb here by just asking you to let me edit Kanye's Misplaced Pages article. But I've noticed that the people in charge on editing have left out a lot of information in the sections about 2016, which was a pivotal moment in his life. If we can work together to come to an agreement then that'd be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tronfa (talk • contribs) 19:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey Tronfa, nobody is in charge of any article on Misplaced Pages. It so happens that some editors who probably have the article on their watchlist are more willing to respond to edit requests than others. That said, if you'd like to add anything specific to the article and don't yet have the necessary user rights to edit it directly, feel free to make a request on Talk:Kanye West following the steps here and using this template. Throast (talk | contribs) 23:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Kevin Campbell

Hi I edited and removed information on Kevin Campbells Misplaced Pages page because a. It was untrue and gives a false impression of the relationship with Mark Morrison and b. There was no court injunction or dispute with Mark Morrison. I know this as a fact because I was in the room with both Kevin and Mark at that time advising them both. I would be grateful if you would remove once again that which I edited. Thank you. Robert 90.247.92.2 (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I advise you refrain from editing any articles on Misplaced Pages about subjects you have personal or professional relationships with as this presents a conflict of interest. The information you removed seems to be supported by reliable sources. I suggest raising the issue on the article talk page using {{Edit COI}} and providing independent reliable sources to support your claim. Note that these sources need to be published; your own testimony does not count as a reliable source. Throast (talk | contribs) 16:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Helmuth Nyborg and far-right

Hi, I have significantly updated the Helmuth Nyborg article with reliable sources . I believe that "far-right" is warranted for a description in the lead. Would you agree with this? 51.6.193.169 (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I've responded on the article talk page. Please consider the compromise made by the other IP. Also, while acknowledging that you were not the instigator, I ask you to refrain from personally attacking other editors. Throast (talk | contribs) 20:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Could you please give your opinion about the latest attempt to add the "far-right politician" label in the article's first sentence? On the talk page, we seemed to agree for a while that the wording I proposed here was the best summary, but now there is another attempt to restore the 51.6.193.169 IP's original change. 84.212.187.87 (talk) 16:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
The label should not be included pending consensus, so feel free to remove it for that reason. I've stated that I'm opposed to the "far-right" label in the lead sentence and have proposed a compromise which nobody (neither IP nor other participants) have commented on. However, I don't feel passionate either way and will probably not comment any further. If editors keep restoring the label without discussion, WP:RFC might be the way forward. Throast (talk | contribs) 18:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
As I said on the article talk page, I think additional RFCs or noticeboard threads would not be appropriate after the existing noticeboard thread already failed to make a consensus for inclusion. Of the two people who came to that article from the fringe theories noticeboard, there is one (you) who opposes including it in the first sentence, and one (Joe Roe) who thinks it should be mentioned in the lead section, but also supported my proposed compromise. But I also think I shouldn't revert the additions more than three times, even though BLP issues are an exception to the three-revert rule. My next revert will be my third in about 24hrs. Can you suggest any other solutions, if the material in the first sentence keeps being restored after I next remove it? 84.212.187.87 (talk) 04:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
You should try hashing it out with Generalrelative first. They've interpreted my "bottom up" comment to be about the "far-right" label, which it was not, so there seems to be major confusion/miscommunication there. The label is clearly contentious, and a single editor's judgment should not override the discussion on the talk page. If it gets restored again, I suggest requesting full protection (of the version without the "far-right" label in the lead sentence) at WP:RFPP pending consensus. Throast (talk | contribs) 08:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Do you still think reverting again and then requesting page protection is the right solution? The user now restoring the material in the first sentence is the same one who added it there recently. It looks to me like someone also is using a blatant sock puppet to try to poison the well for undoing this change, and I'm not sure what's the correct way to react to that. 84.212.187.87 (talk) 22:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
I suggest requesting full page protection and briefly describing the content dispute + linking the version without the disputed content. That way, an admin can decide the appropriate course of action, and you're in the clear regarding reverts. However, looking at how the talk page discussion is developing, consensus seems to be turning against you. If your RFPP is declined, which it very well might be, I strongly recommend moving on from the article altogether. Throast (talk | contribs) 07:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

166 Medium Regiment (India)

I have restored the version of the article 166 Medium Regiment (India) before editing by ODSTsog. As far as I could see, edits made by other editors, including you, during the period when ODSTsog was active, were essentially reverts of ODSTsog's editing, rather than substantially new edits, but if I have inadvertently undone significant contributions of yours then please accept my apology, and, of course, restore the contributions. JBW (talk) 20:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

JBW, that's perfectly fine, I would have done the same had I looked at the edit history. I think one of these edits popped up at recent changes, and I reverted without looking into it further. Thanks! Throast (talk | contribs) 20:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Discussion about "Label" or "distributor"

Hi Throast. In the recent discussion about "Release history" table, Andrew318 said that those are distributors, not labels. So if you have any further comments. Regards. 2001:D08:2910:FB3C:17E0:D15C:D305:FC85 (talk) 10:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)