| Revision as of 04:23, 19 February 2022 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:49, 7 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| nn wrestling cameraman, only claim of noteability is relations to promoters ] 20:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | nn wrestling cameraman, only claim of noteability is relations to promoters ] 20:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - being related to a notable does not automatically make a person notable. - ] <sup>] ] ]</sup> 22:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - being related to a notable does not automatically make a person notable. - ] <sup>] ] ]</sup> 22:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Smerge''' to the relatives, usual story. ] (]) 14:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Smerge''' to the relatives, usual story. ] (]) 14:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''''' < |
:''''' <span style="color:#CC6600;">AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.</span>'''''<br><small> Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ] ] 20:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:relist --> | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom--] 20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom--] 20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to ]. ]] 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to ]. ]] 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. ] 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. ] 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:49, 7 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda 00:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Jackie Crockett
nn wrestling cameraman, only claim of noteability is relations to promoters Burgwerworldz 20:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - being related to a notable does not automatically make a person notable. - Che Nuevara: 22:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Smerge to the relatives, usual story. Stifle (talk) 14:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom--Nick Y. 20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to WP:BIO. Yanksox 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. RFerreira 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.