| Revision as of 11:18, 16 March 2022 editTholme (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,201 editsm lintfix← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:52, 28 August 2023 edit undoL235 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators27,362 edits + | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| U4CBC thoughts | |||
| {{ivmbox|1= | |||
| * "sanctions" -> "remedies". We've been trying to move away from "sanctions" for some time; see ]. | |||
| ; Enforcement templates and procedural documents | |||
| * A bit worried about the choice of regions. Do we know how many editors come from each region? | |||
| The following subsection is added to the ] of the ]: | |||
| * This seems like a lot for a committee of 16 people to take on. In the spirit of the ''coordinating'' that the U4C is supposed to do, I will try to write up specific proposals on the ways in which the U4C can delegate its authority when appropriate, to reduce its overall caseload. | |||
| ** I also suggest that the U4C's subcommittees in some cases include non-U4C members. | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| ** The administrative support for U4C should be significant, professional, and confidential. Don't underestimate the challenge of establishing effective, e.g., CRM systems. | |||
| '''Enforcement templates and procedural documents''' | |||
| ** Mail for the U4C should first go through a screening and organization process before directly going into the inbox of the U4C members. I recommend delegating the task of sorting mail, assigning internal tracking numbers, linking related mail, holding cases until they are ripe for decision before they go into U4C members' inboxes, etc., to trusted non-members or administrative support staff. | |||
| * Relationship between U4C and Global Council? | |||
| Arbitrators and arbitration clerks may, after consultation with the Arbitration Committee, update and maintain templates and procedural documents related to arbitration enforcement processes (including the system). | |||
| * The U4C should establish an advisory group among high-level editors with NDA access, similar to the role of the English Misplaced Pages ] with the enwiki ArbCom. Perhaps a single mailing list for members of high-level decision making bodies as defined in the charter. | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| }} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:52, 28 August 2023
U4CBC thoughts
- "sanctions" -> "remedies". We've been trying to move away from "sanctions" for some time; see User:L235/sanctions verbiage.
- A bit worried about the choice of regions. Do we know how many editors come from each region?
- This seems like a lot for a committee of 16 people to take on. In the spirit of the coordinating that the U4C is supposed to do, I will try to write up specific proposals on the ways in which the U4C can delegate its authority when appropriate, to reduce its overall caseload.
- I also suggest that the U4C's subcommittees in some cases include non-U4C members.
- The administrative support for U4C should be significant, professional, and confidential. Don't underestimate the challenge of establishing effective, e.g., CRM systems.
- Mail for the U4C should first go through a screening and organization process before directly going into the inbox of the U4C members. I recommend delegating the task of sorting mail, assigning internal tracking numbers, linking related mail, holding cases until they are ripe for decision before they go into U4C members' inboxes, etc., to trusted non-members or administrative support staff.
- Relationship between U4C and Global Council?
- The U4C should establish an advisory group among high-level editors with NDA access, similar to the role of the English Misplaced Pages functionaries with the enwiki ArbCom. Perhaps a single mailing list for members of high-level decision making bodies as defined in the charter.