| Revision as of 10:55, 13 February 2007 editMkdw (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators33,692 edits →[]: - changing to more neutral wording as it was taken the wrong way. These lines are very common on afd's← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:48, 1 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''. ''']''' <sub>]</sub> 13:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :{{la|Sreelakshmi Suresh}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Sreelakshmi Suresh}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| The article has since been reworked and anything above this line may have been voted upon review a previous version. ]] 10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | The article has since been reworked and anything above this line may have been voted upon review of a previous version. ]] 10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' - She is the recipient of 17 national and internation awards in India, the United States, and UK. I have added the proper citations and references along with eliminated the NPOV and formatting issues. ]] 10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' - She is the recipient of 17 national and internation awards in India, the United States, and UK. I have added the proper citations and references along with eliminated the NPOV and formatting issues. ]] 10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Strong Delete''' nn little girl, nothing but a news sideshow. Haven't seen any awards that seemed to be notable and/or awarded for a real purpose (as in, not her age). A big part of notability is ''Thus, if a topic once satisfied the primary notability criterion, it continues to satisfy it over time.''. 25 years from now, would she still be notable? --<small> ]<sup>]</sup> </small> 12:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' doesn't really meet ] as per above, unfortunately the only thing different from thousands of other web designers is her age in a couple of years that will change. <sup>]]</sup> 14:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Strong Keep''', there are numerous references there. I disagree with people claiming she will not be notable in 25 years from now, they are misreading ]. Consider this, if I win the Olympic gold medal for the 100m sprint and then do nothing else ever again in my life does that make me not notable? Of course not! Likewise, even if this girl insteads up being a complete slacker when she grows up she is still "notable" for what she did in the past. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Strong keep''' -- 17 national and ''international'' awards!?!? In 25 years, very few people will remember ] (a former U.S. Supreme Court justice). In fact, very few people remember him even now. To say that the subject of this article fails notability (after the improvements made) is a serious misinterpretation of the idea of "lasting notability". -- ] 21:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' I never meant that future notability is a sign for current notability. I meant, that considering she's basically just a news sideshow, and there are probably thousands of children designing web pages, without her fame, she ''doesn't'' satisfy a real notability. Sort of how even if they're working at Pizza Hut now, the original ] might be notable, but someone who only had a role on an episode or two isn't --<small> ]<sup>]</sup> </small> 23:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' Please stop the edit war on this AFD page immediately. --] | ] 23:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :: Uh, it already has --<small> ]<sup>]</sup> </small> 00:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Keep''' -- The age at which someone achieves international recognition does <i>not</i> change with that person's age. ] 23:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 05:48, 1 March 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Majorly (o rly?) 13:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Sreelakshmi Suresh
- Sreelakshmi Suresh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The article has since been reworked and anything above this line may have been voted upon review of a previous version. Mkdw 10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - She is the recipient of 17 national and internation awards in India, the United States, and UK. I have added the proper citations and references along with eliminated the NPOV and formatting issues. Mkdw 10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete nn little girl, nothing but a news sideshow. Haven't seen any awards that seemed to be notable and/or awarded for a real purpose (as in, not her age). A big part of notability is Thus, if a topic once satisfied the primary notability criterion, it continues to satisfy it over time.. 25 years from now, would she still be notable? -- feb 12:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't really meet WP:NOTE as per above, unfortunately the only thing different from thousands of other web designers is her age in a couple of years that will change. 14:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, there are numerous references there. I disagree with people claiming she will not be notable in 25 years from now, they are misreading WP:N. Consider this, if I win the Olympic gold medal for the 100m sprint and then do nothing else ever again in my life does that make me not notable? Of course not! Likewise, even if this girl insteads up being a complete slacker when she grows up she is still "notable" for what she did in the past. Mathmo 16:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep -- 17 national and international awards!?!? In 25 years, very few people will remember Harry Blackmun (a former U.S. Supreme Court justice). In fact, very few people remember him even now. To say that the subject of this article fails notability (after the improvements made) is a serious misinterpretation of the idea of "lasting notability". -- Black Falcon 21:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I never meant that future notability is a sign for current notability. I meant, that considering she's basically just a news sideshow, and there are probably thousands of children designing web pages, without her fame, she doesn't satisfy a real notability. Sort of how even if they're working at Pizza Hut now, the original Power Rangers might be notable, but someone who only had a role on an episode or two isn't -- feb 23:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Please stop the edit war on this AFD page immediately. --Dhartung | Talk 23:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Uh, it already has -- feb 00:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep -- The age at which someone achieves international recognition does not change with that person's age. Mvandemar 23:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.