Misplaced Pages

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:54, 23 March 2022 editKenzie.one (talk | contribs)230 editsm HistoryTag: Visual edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:20, 6 December 2024 edit undoAdem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,948 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(258 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Security-oriented intergovernmental organization}} {{Short description|Security-oriented intergovernmental organization}}
{{hatnote group|
{{Redirect|OSCE|the examination model|Objective structured clinical examination}} {{Redirect|OSCE|the examination model|Objective structured clinical examination}}
{{Distinguish|OECD}}
}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2020}} {{Use dmy dates|date=October 2020}}
{{Infobox geopolitical organization {{Infobox geopolitical organization
| linking_name = the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe | linking_name = the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
| symbol_type = Logo | symbol_type = Logo
| image_flag = OSCE_flag.svg | image_flag = OSCE flag.svg
| image_symbol = OSCE logo.svg | image_symbol = OSCE logo.svg
| symbol_width = 200px | symbol_width = 125px
| image_map = Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (orthographic projection).svg | image_map = Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (orthographic projection).svg
| map_width = 220px | map_width = 220px
| membership = ]<br>] | membership = ]<br>]
| official_languages = English, French, German, Italian, Russian, Spanish | official_languages = ], ], ], ], ], ]
| admin_center_type = Secretariat | admin_center_type = Secretariat
| admin_center = ], Austria | admin_center = ], ]
| org_type = ]<br>with no legal personality | org_type = ]<br>with no ]
| leader_title1 = {{nowrap|]}} | leader_title1 = {{nowrap|]}}
| leader_name1 = {{nowrap|]}} | leader_name1 = {{nowrap|]}}
| leader_title2 = ] | leader_title2 = ]
| leader_name2 = ] | leader_name2 = ]
| leader_title3 = ] | leader_title3 = ]
| leader_name3 = ] | leader_name3 = ]
| leader_title4 = ] | leader_title4 = ]
| leader_name4 = ] | leader_name4 = ]
| leader_title5 = ] | leader_title5 = ]
| leader_name5 = ] | leader_name5 = ]
| established_event1 = As the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe | established_event1 = As the ]
| established_date1 = July 1973 | established_date1 = July 1973
| established_event2 = ] | established_event2 = ]
Line 34: Line 37:
| established_date4 = 1 January 1995 | established_date4 = 1 January 1995
| area_km2 = 50119801 | area_km2 = 50119801
| population_estimate = 1.3 billion<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://countryeconomy.com/countries/groups/osce |title=OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2021 |access-date=3 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170719004054/http://countryeconomy.com/countries/groups/osce |archive-date=19 July 2017 |url-status=live }}</ref> | population_estimate = 1,300,028,916<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://countryeconomy.com/countries/groups/osce |title=OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2022|newspaper=Countryeconomy.com}}</ref>
| GDP_nominal = US$44.5 trillion<ref>{{cite web|url=https://countryeconomy.com/countries/groups/osce|title=OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2018|website=Countryeconomy.com|access-date=30 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170719004054/http://countryeconomy.com/countries/groups/osce|archive-date=19 July 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> | GDP_nominal = US$56.813 trillion<ref>{{cite web |url=https://countryeconomy.com/countries/groups/osce|title=OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2023 |website=Countryeconomy.com}}</ref>
| GDP_PPP_rank = | GDP_PPP_rank =
| GDP_nominal_year = 2020 | GDP_nominal_year = 2023
| GDP_nominal_per_capita = US$34,500 | GDP_nominal_per_capita = US$43,701
| population_estimate_year = 2020 | population_estimate_year = 2023
| population_estimate_rank = 3rd | population_estimate_rank = 3rd
| population_density_km2 = 25 | population_density_km2 = 25
Line 53: Line 56:
}} }}


The '''Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe''' ('''OSCE''') is the world's largest regional security-oriented ] with observer status at the ].<ref>{{Cite web|title=United Nations|url=https://www.osce.org/partnerships/111477|access-date=2022-01-20|website=www.osce.org|language=en}}</ref> Its mandate includes issues such as ], promotion of ], ], and ]s. It employs around 3,460 people, mostly in its field operations but also in its secretariat in ], ], and its institutions.<ref name=galbreath/> The '''Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe''' ('''OSCE''') is a regional security-oriented ] comprising member states in Europe, North America, and Asia. Its mandate includes issues such as ], the promotion of ], ], and ]s. It employs around 3,460 people, mostly in its field operations but also in its secretariat in ], ], and its institutions.<ref name=galbreath>{{cite book |last=Galbreath |first=David J. |title=The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) |series=Routledge global institutions (Volume 14) |year=2007 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York, NY |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=v7d8AgAAQBAJ |isbn=9780203960943}}</ref> It has observer status at the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=United Nations |url=https://www.osce.org/partnerships/111477 |access-date=2022-01-20 |website=www.osce.org |language=en |archive-date=2 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220302183309/https://www.osce.org/partnerships/111477 |url-status=live |quote=On 26 May 1993, a Framework for Co-operation and Co-ordination between the United Nations Secretariat and the CSCE was agreed upon, and in October of the same year, the UN granted the CSCE observer status.}}</ref>


It has its origins in the mid 1975 ] (CSCE) held in ], Finland. The OSCE is concerned with early warning, conflict prevention, ], and post-conflict rehabilitation. Most of its 57 participating countries are in ], but there are a few members present in ] and ]. The participating states cover much of the land area of the ]. It was created during the ] era as a forum for discussion between the ] and ].<ref name=galbreath>{{cite book|last=Galbreath|first=David J.|title=The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)|year=2007|publisher=Routledge|location=New York, NY|isbn=9780203960943}}</ref> The OSCE had its origins in 1975: its predecessors came together during the era of the ] to form a forum for discussion between the ] and the ].<ref>{{cite book |last= Galbreath |first=David J. |title=The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) |series=Routledge global institutions (Volume 14)|year=2007 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York, NY |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=v7d8AgAAQBAJ |isbn=9780203960943 |page=41 |quote=Like the CSCE, the purpose was to promote trust and confidence between East and West.}}</ref> Most of its 57&nbsp;participating countries are in ], but with some members in ] or in ]. The participating countries comprise much of the land area of the ].

The OSCE is concerned with ], conflict prevention, ], and post-conflict rehabilitation.


== History == == History ==
===Roots===
], ], ] and ] at the 1975 CSCE summit in ], Finland]]{{Update|part=History|date=March 2022|reason=Russia-Ukrainian War not mentioned}}
], ], ] and ] at the 1975 CSCE summit in ], Finland]]
The Organization has its roots in the 1973 ] (CSCE). Talks had been mooted about a European security grouping since the 1950s but the ] prevented any substantial progress until the talks at ] in ] began in November 1972. These talks were held at the suggestion of the ] which wished to use the talks to maintain its control over the ] in ], and ] ] hosted them in order to bolster his ]. ], however, saw these talks as a way to reduce the tension in the region, furthering economic cooperation and obtaining humanitarian improvements for the populations of the ].


The Organization has its roots in the 1975 ] (CSCE). Talks had been mooted about a European security grouping since the 1950s but the ] prevented any substantial progress until the talks at ] in ] began in November 1972. These talks were held at the suggestion of the ] which wished to use the talks to maintain its control over the ]s in ], and ] ] hosted them in order to bolster his ]. ], however, saw these talks as a way to reduce the tension in the region, furthering economic cooperation and obtaining humanitarian improvements for the populations of the ].
The recommendations of the talks, in the form of "The Blue Book", gave the practical foundations for a three-stage conference called the "Helsinki process".<ref>{{cite web|title=Final Recommendations of the Helsinki Consultations|url=http://www.osce.org/mc/40213|publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe|access-date=9 May 2015|date=3 July 1973|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518092327/http://www.osce.org/mc/40213|archive-date=18 May 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> The CSCE opened in Helsinki on 3 July 1973 with 35 states sending representatives. Stage&nbsp;I only took five days to agree to follow the Blue Book. Stage&nbsp;II was the main working phase and was conducted in ] from 18 September 1973 until 21 July 1975.


The recommendations of the talks, in the form of "The Blue Book", gave the practical foundations for a three-stage conference called the "Helsinki process".<ref>{{cite web |title=Final Recommendations of the Helsinki Consultations |url=http://www.osce.org/mc/40213 |publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe |access-date=9 May 2015 |date=3 July 1973 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518092327/http://www.osce.org/mc/40213 |archive-date=18 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> The CSCE opened in Helsinki on 3 July 1973 with 35 states sending representatives. Stage&nbsp;I took only five days to agree to follow the Blue Book. Stage&nbsp;II was the main working phase and was conducted in ] from 18 September 1973 until 21 July 1975.
The result of Stage&nbsp;II was the ]. This was signed by the 35 participating states during Stage&nbsp;III, which took place in ] between 30 July – 1 August 1975. It was opened by the ]'s diplomat Cardinal ], who was the chairman of the conference.

The result of Stage&nbsp;II was the ]. This was signed by the 35&nbsp;participating states during Stage&nbsp;III, which took place in ] between 30 July – 1 August 1975. It was opened by the ]'s diplomat Cardinal ], who was the chairman of the conference.


The concepts of improving relations and implementing the act were developed over a series of follow-up meetings, with major gatherings in ] (4 October 1977{{spaced ndash}}8 March 1978), ] (11 November 1980{{spaced ndash}}9 September 1983) and ] (4 November 1986{{spaced ndash}}19 January 1989). The concepts of improving relations and implementing the act were developed over a series of follow-up meetings, with major gatherings in ] (4 October 1977{{spaced ndash}}8 March 1978), ] (11 November 1980{{spaced ndash}}9 September 1983) and ] (4 November 1986{{spaced ndash}}19 January 1989).


The ] was written "to ensure that individuals are permitted to exercise their rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of association, including the right to form, join and participate effectively in non-governmental organizations, which seek the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms."<ref name="nosce">{{cite news |title=EU Statement on the continued crackdown on civil society in Russia |url=https://www.norway.no/en/missions/osce/norway-and-the-osce/statements/statements-with-norwegian-alignment-2021/eu-statement-on-the-continued-crackdown-on-civil-society-in-russia/ |work=OSCE Permanent Council No. 1323 |publisher=The Permanent Delegation of Norway to the OSCE |date=8 July 2021 |access-date=7 January 2023 |archive-date=7 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230107181839/https://www.norway.no/en/missions/osce/norway-and-the-osce/statements/statements-with-norwegian-alignment-2021/eu-statement-on-the-continued-crackdown-on-civil-society-in-russia/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
The ] required a change of role for the CSCE. The ], signed on 21 November 1990, marked the beginning of this change. The process was capped by the renaming of the CSCE as the OSCE on 1 January 1995, in accordance with the results of a conference held in ] in 1994. The OSCE now had a formal secretariat, a Senior Council, a Parliamentary Assembly, a Conflict Prevention Centre, and an Office for Free Elections, which later became the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.


The ] was agreed in 1991.<ref name="mmosce">{{cite news |title=Moscow mechanism |url=https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/e/20066.pdf |publisher=OSCE |access-date=8 June 2022 |archive-date=28 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220928055408/https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/e/20066.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref>
In December 1996, the "] Declaration on a Common and Comprehensive Security Model for Europe for the Twenty-First Century" affirmed the universal and indivisible nature of security on the European continent.


===CSCE becomes OSCE===
In ] on 19 November 1999, the OSCE ended a two-day summit by calling for a political settlement in ] and adopting a ].
The ] required a change of role for the CSCE.{{why|date=September 2023}} The ], signed on 21 November 1990, marked the beginning of this change. The process was capped by the renaming of the CSCE as the OSCE on 1 January 1995, in accordance with the results of a conference held in ] in 1994. The OSCE now had a formal secretariat, a Senior Council, a Parliamentary Assembly, a Conflict Prevention Centre, and an Office for Free Elections, which later became the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.<!-- as a matter of historical fact, some of these things occurred; although no citations are provided to verify it. But why was it "required", and who is asserting that? This needs to be explicated, and sourced, to stay in Misplaced Pages. -->


In December 1996, the "] on a Common and Comprehensive Security Model for Europe for the Twenty-First Century" affirmed the universal and ] on the European continent.
Through its ] (ODIHR), the OSCE observes and assesses elections in its member states, in order to support fair and transparent democratic processes, in keeping with the mutual standards to which the organization is committed;<ref name="cns2004">{{cite web|url=http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=%5CPolitics%5Carchive%5C200408%5CPOL20040809c.html |title=International Monitoring of US Election Called 'Frightening'|last=Hammond|first=Roch|date=9 August 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080203051236/http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=%5CPolitics%5Carchive%5C200408%5CPOL20040809c.html|archive-date=3 February 2008|website=CNSNews.com|publisher=Cybercast News Service|access-date=2016-12-30}}</ref> between 1994 and 2004 the OSCE sent teams of observers to monitor more than 150 elections, typically focusing on elections in emerging democracies.<ref name="USAToday2004">{{cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-08-10-osce-observers_x.htm |title=U.S. invites international observers to Nov. election|publisher=USA Today. usatoday.com|date= 10 August 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080515111154/http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-08-10-osce-observers_x.htm|archive-date=15 May 2008|access-date=2016-12-30}}</ref> In 2004, at the invitation of the ] Government, the ODIHR deployed an assessment mission, made up of participants from six OSCE member states, which observed that year's US presidential election and produced a report.<ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161230160843/http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/usa/eom/general_2004 |date=30 December 2016 }}". OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Retrieved 2016-12-30.</ref> It was the first time that a US presidential election was the subject of OSCE monitoring, although the organization had previously monitored state-level American elections in Florida and California, in 2002 and 2003.<ref name="USAToday2004"/>

In ] on 19 November 1999, the OSCE ended a two-day summit<ref name="NATO Review 2000 z633">{{cite web |title=The OSCEs Istanbul Charter for European Security |website=NATO Review |date=July 1, 2000 |url=https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2000/07/01/the-osces-istanbul-charter-for-european-security/index.html |access-date=February 13, 2024}}</ref> by calling for a political settlement in ]<ref name="RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty 1999 z527">{{cite web |last=O'Rourke |first=Breffni |title=OSCE: Summit Hears Clinton, Yeltsin Comment On Chechnya |website=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty |date=November 9, 1999 |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/1092699.html |access-date=February 13, 2024}}</ref> and adopting a ].<ref name="NATO Review 2000 z633" />

Through its ] (ODIHR), the OSCE observes and assesses elections in its member states, in order to support fair and transparent democratic processes, in keeping with the mutual standards to which the organization is committed; between 1994 and 2004 the OSCE sent teams of observers to monitor more than 150 elections, typically focusing on elections in emerging democracies.<ref name="USAToday2004">{{cite web |url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-08-10-osce-observers_x.htm |title=U.S. invites international observers to Nov. election |publisher=USA Today. usatoday.com |date=10 August 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080515111154/http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-08-10-osce-observers_x.htm |archive-date=15 May 2008 |access-date=2016-12-30}}</ref> In 2004, at the invitation of the ] Government, the ODIHR deployed an assessment mission, made up of participants from six OSCE member states, which observed that year's US presidential election and produced a report.<ref> {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161230160843/http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/usa/eom/general_2004 |date=30 December 2016}}. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Retrieved 2016-12-30.</ref> It was the first time that a US presidential election was the subject of OSCE monitoring, although the organization had previously monitored state-level American elections in Florida and California, in 2002 and 2003.<ref name="USAToday2004"/>

==== Criticism of OSCE ====
Members of OSCE have criticised the organisation for being in a position where Russia, and sometimes Belarus, can veto all OSCE decisions, Moscow has, for a number of years, not allowed the approval of the organisation's budget, the organisation of official OSCE events or the extension of missions. In November 2023 they vetoed the appointment of Estonia as chairman from 2024.<ref>{{cite web |title=Formin expresses regret over Russia and Belarus veto of Estonia's 2024 OSCE chairmanship |url=http://www.baltictimes.com/formin_expresses_regret_over_russia_and_belarus_veto_of_estonia_s_2024_osce_chairmanship/ |date=21 November 2023}}</ref>

=== OSCE missions and operations ===

==== 1992 Georgia Mission ====
The OSCE Mission to Georgia was established in November 1992 with its headquarters in the capital ]. The Mission's mandate expired on 31 December 2008. Between these dates it was powerless to control the outbreak of the August 2008 ].<ref name="gosce">{{cite news |title=OSCE Mission to Georgia (closed) |url=https://www.osce.org/georgia-closed |publisher=OSCE |date=n.d. |access-date=8 June 2022 |archive-date=8 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220608230312/https://www.osce.org/georgia-closed |url-status=live}}</ref>

==== 1993 Mission to Moldova ====
The objective of the mission to ] is to facilitate a comprehensive and lasting political settlement of the ] in all its aspects, strengthening the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the ] within its internationally recognised borders with a special status for ].<ref>{{cite web |title=OSCE Mission to Moldova |url=https://www.osce.org/mission-to-moldova |access-date=21 October 2023}}</ref>

OSCE promoted a ] as a diplomatic negotiation platform, which began in 2005, suspended by Russia and Transnistria in 2006 until it started again in 2012, before making slow progress over the next ten years. The process stopped following the 2022 ] as two of the parties were then at war with each other.

In December 2022 Russia blocked the renewal of the annual mandate by limiting it to a six month period, repeated again in June 2023 to another six month period.<ref>{{cite web |title=OSCE Moldova mission mandate extended for six months |url=https://www.shrmonitor.org/osce-moldova-mission-mandate-extended-for-six-months/ |date=30 June 2023}}</ref>

==== 1995 Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina ====
The ] concluded in 1995 with the ] with the ongoing OSCE Mission being mandated to helping to secure lasting peace and therefore to build a stable, secure, and democratic state through building sustainable democratic institutions, strengthening good governance and human rights principles, and supporting the development of a multi-national and multi-ethnic democratic society.<ref>{{cite web |title=OSCE MISSION TO BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA |url=https://www.osce.org/mission-to-bosnia-and-herzegovina/mandate |access-date=21 October 2023}}</ref>

==== 1998 Kosovo Mission ====
The OSCE ] was established by the Permanent Council in October 1998 and shuttered in June 1999 amidst the recalcitrance of the ].{{citation needed|date=September 2023}}

The 1999 ] took over the work in Kosovo where it concentrates on institution and democracy building, as well as human rights.

The OSCE's refusal to police events surrounding the ] still rankles in Russia.<ref name="rusview">{{cite news |title=RUSSIAN VIEWS OF THE OSCE ACTIVITIES |url=https://www.rusemb.org.uk/osce/ |publisher=he Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia |access-date=8 June 2022 |archive-date=26 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220626193021/https://www.rusemb.org.uk/osce/ |url-status=live}}</ref>

==== 2001 Mission to Macedonia ====
The ongoing Mission to Macedonia is monitoring and supporting the implementation of the ] that put an end to the 2001 armed conflict in ].

==== 2001 Mission to Serbia ====
The current mission to Serbia started after ] lost his power as ] in 2000. The mission was mandated to assist the authorities and civil society with democratic development and human rights protection, including the rights of persons belonging to national minorities. To promote democratisation, tolerance and the rule of law.<ref>{{cite web |title=OSCE MISSION TO SERBIA |url=https://www.osce.org/mission-to-serbia/mandate |access-date=21 October 2023}}</ref>

==== 2006 Mission to Montenegro ====
The current mission began with the ], monitored by OSCE, with a mandate being granted with the objective of assisting and promoting the implementation of OSCE principles and commitments including the politico-military and human aspects of security and stability.<ref>{{cite web |title=OSCE MISSION TO MONTENEGRO |url=https://www.osce.org/mission-to-montenegro/mandate |access-date=21 October 2023}}</ref>

==== 2012 Texas election ====
Before the U.S. presidential elections of November 2012, the OSCE announced its intention to send electoral observers to Texas and to other ]s. This prompted the Attorney General of Texas ] to send letters to U.S. ] ] and to the OSCE,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/releases/2012/102312abbot_letter.pdf |title=Attorney General of Texas |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130114215959/https://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/releases/2012/102312abbot_letter.pdf |archive-date=14 January 2013 |website=oag.state.tx.us |url-status=dead |access-date=18 January 2013 }}</ref> threatening to arrest OSCE officials if they should enter electoral premises in Texas and break ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=4199 |date=25 October 2012 |title=Attorney General Abbott Informs U.S. State Department that International Election Observers Cannot Circumvent Texas Law |publisher=Texas Attorney General |website=Oag.state.tx.us |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024053635/https://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=4199 |archive-date=24 October 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In reply, the ] stated that OSCE observers enjoyed immunities.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728033857/https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2012/10/199824.htm#DEPARTMENT |date=28 July 2020}} US State Department.</ref> In the event, no incidents between OSCE and Texas authorities were recorded during the elections.

==== 2017 Turkey constitutional referendum ====
In April 2017, Turkish President ] criticized the OSCE for reporting that opposition "No" campaigners in the ] had faced bans, police interventions and arrests. Erdoğan said: "Now the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe says if the result is 'yes', that means there are a lot of problems. Who are you? First of all, you should know your place. This is not your duty."<ref> {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508054305/http://www.euronews.com/2017/04/14/erdogan-slams-osce-ahead-of-constitutional-referendum |date=8 May 2018 }}. ]. 14 April 2017.</ref><ref>" {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508054844/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/president-erdogan-slams-osce-over-referendum-campaign-report--112053 |date=8 May 2018 }}". '']''. 14 April 2017.</ref><ref>
{{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508055229/http://www.dw.com/en/osce-turkey-referendum-contested-on-an-unlevel-playing-field/a-38453816 |date=8 May 2018 }}. '']'', 17 April 2017.</ref>

==== OSCE involvement in Ukraine (2014–2021) ====
]
On 21 March 2014, the OSCE deployed its ] at the request of Ukraine's government.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220329232817/https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine |date=29 March 2022}}. OSCE.</ref> The mission has received mixed reviews. While some observers have applauded its function as the "eyes and ears of the international community",<ref>{{cite journal |last=Stephanie |first=Liechtenstein |title=The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission has become the Eyes and Ears of the International Community on the Ground in Ukraine |journal=Security and Human Rights |date=1 March 2014 |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=5–10 |doi=10.1163/18750230-02501008}}</ref> others have accused the mission of bias towards either Russia or Ukraine.

On 27 April 2014, the ] group that had taken control in the city of ] took eight members of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (OSCE SMM) as hostages.<ref>Luke Harding. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806004221/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/27/ukraine-kidnapped-observers-slavyansk-vyacheslav-ponomarev |date=6 August 2020 }}. '']'', 27 April 2014.</ref> The group appointed ] as mayor of the city.

During the ], an OSCE observer allowed Russian separatists to travel in a vehicle with the organization's markings; this prompted allegations that the OSCE was biased in the war and not interested in carrying out its duties of mediating a ceasefire. The organization issued a statement regretting the incident.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ru.tsn.ua/politika/nablyudateli-obse-vozili-v-svoem-avtomobile-vooruzhennyh-boevikov-389982.html |publisher=TSN |title=Наблюдатели ОБСЕ возили в своем автомобиле вооруженных боевиков |language=ru |date=3 October 2014 |access-date=4 October 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141005233633/http://ru.tsn.ua/politika/nablyudateli-obse-vozili-v-svoem-avtomobile-vooruzhennyh-boevikov-389982.html |archive-date=5 October 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>

Moreover, the OSCE Observer Mission at Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk (which is organizationally separate from the Special Monitoring Mission) also received criticism alleging that only two checkpoints on the Russian–Ukrainian border are currently being monitored, which Daniel Baer, the US ambassador to the OSCE at the time, described as "seriously inadequate".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Marshall |first=Andrew |date=2022-09-01 |title=What is the Organisation for Security and Co-Operation in Europe? - Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute |url=https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2022/09/01/what-is-the-organisation-for-security-and-co-operation-in-europe/ |access-date=2022-12-29 |website=bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com |language=en-GB |archive-date=29 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221229092441/https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2022/09/01/what-is-the-organisation-for-security-and-co-operation-in-europe/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

The mission has been criticized for taking months to deploy drones to help monitor borders as well as withdrawing them after only several weeks of use due to Russian electronic attacks. Drones have been reintroduced to observe the conflict in 2018.<ref>{{cite news |title=OSCE relaunches long-range surveillance drone program in Ukraine |url=https://www.unian.info/war/10058525-osce-relaunches-long-range-surveillance-drone-program-in-ukraine.html |publisher=UNIAN |date=27 March 2018 |access-date=4 January 2021 |archive-date=21 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121002240/https://www.unian.info/war/10058525-osce-relaunches-long-range-surveillance-drone-program-in-ukraine.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

In 2014, an advisor to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence wrongly claimed that approximately 80% of the OSCE observers located near ] were Russian citizens and that many had ties to Russian security agencies such as the ] and the ]. In reality, one observer out of 17 in Mariupol was a Russian citizen.<ref>{{cite news |title=OSCE denies it gave information about Ukrainian troop positions to Russians |url=https://www.unian.info/society/1008007-osce-denies-it-gave-information-about-ukrainian-troop-positions-to-russians.html |access-date=24 January 2021 |publisher=UNIAN |date=11 November 2014 |archive-date=18 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418121437/https://www.unian.info/society/1008007-osce-denies-it-gave-information-about-ukrainian-troop-positions-to-russians.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In total, the mission reports the number of Russian citizens in its ranks as 39 out of 720, or 5,4%.<ref>{{cite web |title=Status Report 14 December 2020 |url=https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/e/3/474042.pdf |website=OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine |publisher=OSCE |access-date=4 January 2021 |archive-date=27 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210127175322/https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/e/3/474042.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> The organization has also been accused of allegedly revealing the locations of Ukrainian troops to Russian forces during the conflict.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://osce.einnews.com/article__detail/233848306?lcode=xlBANnWjcZIh_XzBy9uIdg%3D%3D |publisher=OSCE news |title=The OSCE monitoring mission has stopped using drones to monitor the situation in the rebel-held territories}}{{Dead link |date=September 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://euroua.com/europe/osce/3258-missiya-obse-v-ukraine-pod-shkvalom-kritiki |publisher=EuroUA|title= Миссия ОБСЕ в Украине под шквалом критики |access-date=11 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141015223106/http://euroua.com/europe/osce/3258-missiya-obse-v-ukraine-pod-shkvalom-kritiki |archive-date=15 October 2014 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://gazeta.ua/ru/articles/politics/_litvin-rasskazal-genseku-obse-chto-kritika-v-adres-ukrainy-ne-vsegda-ob-ektivna/400033 |publisher=Gazeta |title=Литвин рассказал генсеку ОБСЕ, что критика в адрес Украины не всегда объективна|date= 16 September 2011 |access-date=11 November 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141111060936/http://gazeta.ua/ru/articles/politics/_litvin-rasskazal-genseku-obse-chto-kritika-v-adres-ukrainy-ne-vsegda-ob-ektivna/400033 |archive-date=11 November 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.liga.net/news/politics/4011607-rossiya_uznala_ot_obse_mesta_dislokatsii_ryada_podrazdeleniy_sil_ato.htm |publisher=Liga |title=Россия узнала от ОБСЕ места дислокации ряда подразделений сил АТО |date=11 November 2014 |access-date=11 November 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141111060121/http://news.liga.net/news/politics/4011607-rossiya_uznala_ot_obse_mesta_dislokatsii_ryada_podrazdeleniy_sil_ato.htm |archive-date=11 November 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ukrinform.ua/rus/news/minoboroni_80_sotrudnikov_obse_v_mariupole__rossiyane_sredi_nih_fsbshniki_1682979 |publisher=Ukrinform |title=Минобороны: 80% сотрудников ОБСЕ в Мариуполе – россияне, среди них ФСБшники |access-date=11 November 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150603002550/http://www.ukrinform.ua/rus/news/minoboroni_80_sotrudnikov_obse_v_mariupole__rossiyane_sredi_nih_fsbshniki_1682979 |archive-date=3 June 2015 |url-status=dead}}</ref>

On 1 December 2014, the mission was in the area to "facilitate a local ceasefire and monitor the repair works on a power station", that it "heard an exchange of artillery fire between unspecified parties", and that "artillery rounds were impacting at approximately 1km to the east of the SMM's position; therefore the SMM left due to security concerns". Furthermore, the report states that the "SMM team in the ] was in constant contact with the SMM team in Staromikhailivka". No mention of a wounded observer is made.<ref>{{cite web |title=Latest from OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) based on information received as of 18:00 (Kyiv time) 1 December 2014 |url=https://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/128901 |website=OSCE.org |publisher=OSCE |access-date=28 January 2021 |archive-date=2 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210202014237/https://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/128901 |url-status=live }}</ref>

On 27 October 2015, a suspended OSCE monitor confirmed he had been a former employee of Russia's ]. The suspended SMM stated that he had no trouble receiving the position and neither the OSCE nor Ukraine's Security Service thoroughly checked his background.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unian.info/politics/1166116-suspended-osce-monitor-confirms-hes-russian-gru-officer.html |publisher=UNIAN |title=Suspended OSCE monitor confirms he's Russian GRU officer |access-date=28 October 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151028133935/http://www.unian.info/politics/1166116-suspended-osce-monitor-confirms-hes-russian-gru-officer.html |archive-date=28 October 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> Following the report the OSCE issued a comment stating the monitor had been fired due to violations of the organization's code of conduct.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/10/osce-ukraine-lies/ |publisher=Value Walk |title=That Time A Russian OSCE Monitor in Ukraine Got Drunk, Said Too Much |date=30 October 2015 |access-date=30 October 2015 |archive-date=28 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728033914/https://www.valuewalk.com/2015/10/osce-ukraine-lies/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

On 6 April 2016, photos of OSCE monitors attending the wedding of a Russian separatist emerged. The wedding had taken place in June 2015. The OSCE expressed regret over the incident, issuing a statement saying "The unprofessional behaviour displayed by the monitors in the picture is an individual incident that should not be abused to cast a shadow on the reputation of other mission members." The OSCE reported that the monitors were no longer with the OSCE special monitoring mission.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-osce-staff-at-separatist-wedding/27660759.html |publisher=Radio Free Europe |title= OSCE Expresses 'Regret' After Staff Shown at Separatist Wedding in Ukraine |newspaper=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty |date=7 April 2016 |access-date=7 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160408065108/http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-osce-staff-at-separatist-wedding/27660759.html |archive-date=8 April 2016 |url-status=live|last1=Shamanska |first1=Anna }}</ref>

In April 2017, an OSCE vehicle struck a mine, which killed one SMM member and injured two.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-osce-idUSKBN17P0CZ|title=American member of watchdog OSCE killed in Ukraine |date=24 April 2017 |work=] |access-date=2 July 2017 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170704183146/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-osce-idUSKBN17P0CZ |archive-date=4 July 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Two armoured vehicles were on patrol near ] when one struck the mine.<ref name="NYT01">{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/23/world/europe/american-killed-ukraine.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-1&action=click&contentCollection=Europe&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article |title=Land Mine Kills American on Monitoring Mission in Ukraine |date=23 April 2017 |work=The New York Times |access-date=24 April 2017 |agency=Reuters |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171231052020/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/23/world/europe/american-killed-ukraine.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-1&action=click&contentCollection=Europe&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article |archive-date=31 December 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> The dead man was an American paramedic, while the injured included a woman from ] and a man from the ].<ref name=NYT01/>

On 18 July 2018, the German broadcaster ] reported that Russian intelligence services had received inside information about the activities of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine from a staff member of the OSCE. The insider information consisted of observers' preferences in alcohol and women, their financial situation, and their contacts in Ukraine. The OSCE issued a statement expressing concern over the alleged security breach.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.france24.com/en/20180718-osce-ukraine-mission-says-claim-russian-spying-big-blow |title=OSCE Ukraine mission says claim of Russian spying 'big blow' |date=18 July 2018 |publisher=France24 |access-date=18 July 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180718193243/http://www.france24.com/en/20180718-osce-ukraine-mission-says-claim-russian-spying-big-blow |archive-date=18 July 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref>

Russia has accused members of the Mission of working for the Ukrainian ] and of spying on the pro-Russian separatists.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Miller |first1=Christopher |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-fsb-arrests-osce-ukraine-spying/27865916.html |title=Russia Detains OSCE Monitor, Accuses Him Of Spying For Ukraine |access-date=4 January 2021 |publisher=Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty |date=18 July 2016 |archive-date=12 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210112001030/https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-fsb-arrests-osce-ukraine-spying/27865916.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Furthermore, Russia has accused the mission of bias after it reported troop movements from separatist forces, accusing the mission of ignoring similar moves from Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ukraine crisis: Russia accuses OSCE monitors of bias |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30056604 |agency=BBC |date=14 November 2014 |access-date=4 January 2021 |archive-date=12 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112023822/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30056604 |url-status=live }}</ref> Russia's foreign minister also has claimed that the mission failed to pay sufficient attention to human and minority rights within the Government-controlled areas of Ukraine. Furthermore, he criticised that the mission did not clearly attribute ceasefire violations to either side.<ref>{{cite news |title=Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov unhappy with OSCE SMM's performance in Ukraine |url=https://www.unian.info/world/osce-russia-s-foreign-minister-lavrov-unhappy-with-osce-monitors-in-ukraine-11109665.html |access-date=8 January 2021 |publisher=UNIAN |date=12 August 2020 |archive-date=21 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200921010547/https://www.unian.info/world/osce-russia-s-foreign-minister-lavrov-unhappy-with-osce-monitors-in-ukraine-11109665.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

==== 2022 Mission to Armenia ====
An OSCE ] was sent to ] between 21 and 27 October 2022 following the ]. The request was made by the ]. The OSCE sent international experts to monitor the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/529239|title=OSCE sends a needs assessment team to Armenia|date=October 19, 2022}}</ref>

==== OSCE involvement in Ukraine (2022–present) ====
The ] began on February 24. The OSCE mandate in Ukraine expired on March 31, 2022, due to objections by Russia. On April 24, 2022, the OSCE protested the detention of four staff members in Donetsk and Luhansk, without specifying who had detained them.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/516447 |title=OSCE Chairman-in-Office and Secretary General call for immediate release of detained OSCE officials in areas of Donetsk and Luhansk |access-date=25 April 2022 |archive-date=25 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220425105630/https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/516447 |url-status=live }}</ref> On 20 September, two Ukrainian OSCE staffers were sentenced to 13 years of prison by a court in the ] for "alleged high treason and espionage for the United States."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Liechtenstein |first1=Stephanie |title=OSCE Ukrainian staff members sentenced in Russian-separatist kangaroo court |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/20/osce-ukrainian-staff-russian-court-00057715 |website=] |access-date=2022-09-22 |language=en |date=2022-09-20 |archive-date=22 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220922022139/https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/20/osce-ukrainian-staff-russian-court-00057715 |url-status=live }}</ref>

In March 2022, 45 participating States promoted, with the support of Ukraine, the activation of the ] for the establishment of an independent expert mission on violations and abuses committed in the war of the Russian Federation, supported by Belarus, against Ukraine.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://delegazioneosce.esteri.it/it/news/dalla_rappresentanza/2022/03/bozza-nuovo-articolo/|title=Attivazione del Meccanismo di Mosca dell'OSCE sui diritti umani in relazione all'attacco russo in Ucraina|language=IT|website=delegazioneosce.esteri.it|access-date=27 December 2022|archive-date=27 December 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221227145346/https://delegazioneosce.esteri.it/it/news/dalla_rappresentanza/2022/03/bozza-nuovo-articolo/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.international.gc.ca/news-nouvelles/2022/2022-03-03-statement_humanitarian_kinnear-declaration_humanitaires.aspx?lang=eng|title=Statement by Ambassador Jocelyn Kinnear on the invocation of the Moscow mechanism to address the human rights and humanitarian impacts of Russia's invasion and acts of war against Ukraine|date=3 March 2022|access-date=8 June 2022|archive-date=30 May 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220530232329/https://www.international.gc.ca/news-nouvelles/2022/2022-03-03-statement_humanitarian_kinnear-declaration_humanitaires.aspx?lang=eng|url-status=live}}</ref> The report of the Mission of Experts was presented to the OSCE Permanent Council on 13 April 2022 and documented clear patterns of violations of international humanitarian law by the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/f/a/515868.pdf|title=Report on violations of international humanitarian and human rights law, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Ukraine since 24 february 2022|date=12 April 2022|website=osce.org|access-date=8 June 2022|archive-date=7 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220607134515/https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/f/a/515868.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> OSCE/] continues to monitor the violations of ] and ] in Ukraine.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The legal framework applicable to the armed conflict in Ukraine |url=https://www.osce.org/odihr/548614 |access-date=2024-03-20 |website=www.osce.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Ukraine Monitoring Initiative Methodology |url=https://www.osce.org/odihr/548611 |access-date=2024-03-20 |website=www.osce.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine |url=https://www.osce.org/odihr/523081 |access-date=2024-03-20 |website=www.osce.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Second Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine |url=https://www.osce.org/odihr/534933 |access-date=2024-03-20 |website=www.osce.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Third Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine |url=https://www.osce.org/odihr/548629 |access-date=2024-03-20 |website=www.osce.org |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Fourth Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine |url=https://www.osce.org/odihr/560325 |access-date=2024-03-20 |website=www.osce.org |language=en}}</ref>

On 2 June 2022, the same 45 participating States invoked again the Moscow Mechanism to establish a new mission of experts to consider, follow up and build upon the findings of the Moscow Mechanism report published in April 2022.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://delegazioneosce.esteri.it/it/news/dalla_rappresentanza/2022/06/nuova-attivazione-del-meccanismo/|title=Nuova attivazione del Meccanismo di Mosca dell'OSCE sulla guerra di aggressione russa in Ucraina|language=IT|website=delegazioneosce.esteri.it|access-date=27 December 2022|archive-date=27 December 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221227145339/https://delegazioneosce.esteri.it/it/news/dalla_rappresentanza/2022/06/nuova-attivazione-del-meccanismo/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://osce.delegfrance.org/STATEMENT-BY-FRANCE-ON-THE-INVOCATION-OF-THE-MOSCOW-MECHANISM-TO-ADDRESS-THE-1788|title=Statement by France on the invocation of the Moscow Mechanism to address the human rights and humanitarian impacts of Russia's invasion and acts of war against Ukraine|date=2 June 2022|website=delegfrance.org|access-date=8 June 2022|archive-date=24 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230124215234/https://osce.delegfrance.org/STATEMENT-BY-FRANCE-ON-THE-INVOCATION-OF-THE-MOSCOW-MECHANISM-TO-ADDRESS-THE-1788|url-status=live}}</ref> The subsequent report, presented on 14 July 2022 to the OSCE Permanent Council, confirmed the outcomes of the previous mission and identified blatant violations of international humanitarian law, mainly attributable to the Russian armed forces, as well as widespread violations of human rights, especially in the territories under effective control of the Russian Federation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.osce.org/odihr/522616|title=Report on violations of international humanitarian and human rights law, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Ukraine (1 April - 25 June 2022)|date=14 July 2022|format=PDF|website=osce.org|access-date=15 July 2022|archive-date=14 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220714230624/https://www.osce.org/odihr/522616|url-status=live}}</ref>

The Russian delegation was not invited to the 29th OSCE Ministerial Council in December 2022 where the delegates considered the ramifications and regional security challenges created by Russia's continued war against Ukraine. There were calls to assess the reparations that Russia should be accountable for.

Since the start of its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has seized €2.7 million worth of armored vehicles that were previously part of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine. According to a letter that was sent by Russian OSCE representatives to OSCE Secretary-General Helga Schmid in January 2023, 71 trucks and cars were brought to the Luhansk People's Republic and the Donetsk People's Republic as "evidence" and criminal proceedings were initiated against former OSCE personnel for espionage.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000143461680/gestohlene-fahrzeuge-entfuehrte-mitarbeiter-die-osze-hadert-mit-russland|title=Gestohlene Fahrzeuge, entführte Mitarbeiter: Die OSZE hadert mit Russland|date=13 February 2023|website=derstandard.at|access-date=13 February 2023}}</ref>

== OSCE Parliamentary Assembly ==
{{main|Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe}}
In 2004, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly sent ]s to the U.S. presidential elections. The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly's president at the time was Democratic Congressman ]. Hastings had previously been impeached for corruption by the U.S. Congress. The OSCE faced criticism of partisanship and double standards due to Hastings's past and the fact that the OSCE's mandate was to promote democracy and the values of civil society.<ref>{{cite news |title=US vote 'mostly free and fair' |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/americas/2004/vote_usa_2004/3987655.stm |access-date=23 December 2013 |newspaper=BBC |date=5 November 2004 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131213215747/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/americas/2004/vote_usa_2004/3987655.stm |archive-date=13 December 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>


In 2010, the ] was criticized from within by the Latvian delegation for lacking transparency and democracy. ] (b. 1938) secretary general of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, who held the post from the organization's inception in 1992 until 2015, faced a challenge from the Latvian ]. According to the rules of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the incumbent general secretary can only be replaced with a full consensus minus one. Pabriks called the rules "quite shocking from the perspective of an organization that's monitoring elections".<ref> {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217210855/http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0710/An_election_in_Copenhagen.html |date=17 December 2013}} politico.com</ref>
The 2004 assessment took place against the backdrop of the controversial recount effort in the 2000 US presidential election,<ref name="USAToday2004"/> and came about largely through the initiative of 13 ] members of the ]. That group, which included ], of California, and ], of Texas, initially addressed a request for election observers to the ], in a letter to ], the ], but the request was declined.<ref name="cns2004"/> Subsequently, the administration of ] ], through the ], headed by ] ], responded to the lawmakers' concerns by inviting the OSCE election-monitoring mission.<ref name="cns2004"/>


==Synopsis and list of members==
=== Languages === === Languages ===
The six official languages of the OSCE are ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.osce.org/secretariat/327261|title=OSCE website now available in six official languages|publisher=OSCE Secretariat|date=30 June 2017|access-date=7 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190707082107/https://www.osce.org/secretariat/327261|archive-date=7 July 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> The six official languages of the OSCE are ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.osce.org/secretariat/327261 |title=OSCE website now available in six official languages |publisher=OSCE Secretariat |date=30 June 2017 |access-date=7 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190707082107/https://www.osce.org/secretariat/327261 |archive-date=7 July 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref>


=== Participating states === === Participating states ===
Line 90: Line 188:
}}]] }}]]
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:95%;" {| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:95%;"
! rowspan="2" |State !!rowspan="2" data-sort-type="date" |Admission !!colspan="2" |Signed the
!style="width:31%;"| State
!style="width:23%;"| Admission
!style="width:23%;line-height:1.25em;"| Signed the<br />]
!style="width:23%;line-height:1.25em;"| Signed the<br />]
|- |-
! data-sort-type="date" |] !! data-sort-type="date" |]
| {{ALB}} || 19 June 1991 || 16 September 1991 || 17 September 1991
|- |-
| {{AND}} || 25 April 1996 || 10 November 1999 || 17 February 1998 | {{ALB}} || 19 June 1991 ||16 September 1991|| 17 September 1991
|- |-
| {{ARM}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 17 April 1992 | {{AND}} || 25 April 1996 || 10 November 1999|| 17 February 1998
|- |-
| {{AUT}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{ARM}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 17 April 1992
|- |-
| {{AZE}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 20 December 1993 | {{AUT}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{BLR}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992 || 8 April 1993 | {{AZE}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 20 December 1993
|- |-
| {{BEL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{BLR}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992|| 8 April 1993
|- |-
| {{BIH}} || 30 April 1992 || 8 July 1992 || &nbsp; | {{BEL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{BGR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{BIH}} || 30 April 1992 || 8 July 1992 ||
|- |-
| {{CAN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{BGR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{HRV}} || 24 March 1992 || 8 July 1992 || &nbsp; | {{CAN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{CYP}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{HRV}} || 24 March 1992 || 8 July 1992 ||&nbsp;{{refn|Yugoslavia was an original signatory|name=YG|group=Note}}
|- |-
| {{CYP}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
| {{CZE}} || 1 January 1993 || &nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}} || &nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}}
|- |-
| {{CZE}} || 1 January 1993 ||&nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}} ||&nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}}
| {{DEN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{EST}} || 10 September 1991 || 14 October 1991 || 6 December 1991 | {{DEN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{FIN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{EST}} || 10 September 1991|| 14 October 1991 || 6 December 1991
|- |-
| {{FRA}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{FIN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{GEO}} || 24 March 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 21 January 1994 | {{FRA}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{GER}}<br><small>- as {{FRG}}</small><BR><small>- as {{GDR}}</small> || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{GEO}} || 24 March 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 21 January 1994
|- |-
| {{GRE}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{GER}}<br><small>→ as {{FRG}}</small><BR><small>→ as {{GDR}}</small> ||25 June 1973 ||1 August 1975 ||21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{flag|Holy See}}|| 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{GRE}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{HUN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{flag|Holy See}} ||25 June 1973||1 August 1975|| 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{ISL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{HUN}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{IRL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{ISL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{ITA}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{IRL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{KAZ}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 23 September 1992 | {{ITA}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{KGZ}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 3 June 1994 | {{KAZ}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 23 September 1992
|- |-
| {{LVA}} || 10 September 1991 || 14 October 1991 || 6 December 1991 | {{KGZ}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 3 June 1994
|- |-
| {{LIE}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{LVA}} || 10 September 1991|| 14 October 1991 || 6 December 1991
|- |-
| {{LTU}} || 10 September 1991 || 14 October 1991 || 6 December 1991 | {{LIE}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{LUX}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{LTU}} || 10 September 1991|| 14 October 1991 || 6 December 1991
|- |-
| {{MLT}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{LUX}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{MDA}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992 || 29 January 1993 | {{MLT}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{MCO}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{MDA}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992|| 29 January 1993
|- |-
| {{MCO}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
| {{MNG}} || 21 November 2012{{refn|Asia ] 2004-2012.|group=Note}} || || &nbsp;
|- |-
| {{MNG}} || 21 November 2012{{refn|Asia ] 2004–2012. |group=Note}} ||||
| {{MNE}} || 22 June 2006 || 1 September 2006 || &nbsp;
|- |-
| {{NLD}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{MNE}} || 22 June 2006 || 1 September 2006||
|- |-
| {{NLD}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
| {{NMK}}{{refn|Previously referred to by the OSCE as the "Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"|group=Note}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/about/13131.html |title=Archived copy |access-date=27 June 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090709001345/http://www.osce.org/about/13131.html |archive-date=9 July 2009 }}</ref> || 12 October 1995 || 8 July 1992 || &nbsp;
|- |-
| {{NMK}}{{refn|Previously referred to by the OSCE as the "Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"|group=Note}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/about/13131.html |title=OSCE: About - Participating States |access-date=27 June 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090709001345/http://www.osce.org/about/13131.html |archive-date=9 July 2009 }}</ref> ||12 October 1995 ||8 July 1992||&nbsp;{{refn|Yugoslavia was an original signatory|name=YG|group=Note}}
| {{NOR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{POL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{NOR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{POR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{POL}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{ROM}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{POR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{RUS}} (as {{flag|USSR}}) || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{ROM}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{SMR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{RUS}} (as {{flag|USSR}}) || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{SRB}} (as {{flag|Yugoslavia}}) || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{SMR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{SRB}} (as {{flag|Yugoslavia}}) ||25 June 1973|| 1 August 1975||21 November 1990
| {{SVK}} || 1 January 1993 || &nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}} || &nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}}
|- |-
| {{SVK}} || 1 January 1993 ||&nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}} ||&nbsp;{{refn|Czechoslovakia was an original signatory|name=CZ|group=Note}}
| {{SVN}} || 24 March 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 8 March 1993
|- |-
| {{ESP}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{SVN}} || 24 March 1992 || 8 July 1992 || 8 March 1993
|- |-
| {{SWE}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{ESP}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{SWI}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{SWE}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{TJK}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992 || &nbsp; | {{SWI}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{TUR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{TJK}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992||
|- |-
| {{TKM}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992 || &nbsp; | {{TUR}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{UKR}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992 || 16 June 1992 | {{TKM}} || 30 January 1992 || 8 July 1992||
|- |-
| {{UK}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{UKR}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992|| 16 June 1992
|- |-
| {{USA}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990 | {{UK}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990
|- |-
| {{UZB}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992 || 27 October 1993 | {{USA}} || 25 June 1973 || 1 August 1975 || 21 November 1990

|}
{{Reflist|group="Note"}}

====Bilateral Priorities with Participating States====

{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%;"
!style="width:31%;" !class="sortable;"| State
!style="width:33%;"| Bilateral Priorities
!style="width:33%;"| Contexts/Statements
|-
| {{KGZ}} || Elections, Rule of Law, Democracy<ref name="kyrgz-election-2021">{{cite news |title=OSCE Mission Head Cites Lack Of Public Discussion, 'Strong Links' In Kyrgyz Votes |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/osce-mission-head-cites-lack-of-public-discussion-strong-links-in-kyrgyz-votes/31045416.html |agency=rferl}}</ref>
|-
| {{USA}} || Elections || Secretary General Roberto Montella of OSCE PA said the work to monitor the 2020 presidential, congressional and down ballot elections in the US were of the most important in history of the OSCE assembly.<ref name="usa-elections-2020">{{cite news |title=National Security International election observers in the U.S. consider this year the most challenging ever |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/election-international-monitors/2020/10/22/91712842-13c4-11eb-82af-864652063d61_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref>
|- |-
| {{UZB}} || 30 January 1992 || 26 February 1992|| 27 October 1993
|} |}


=== Partners for co-operation === ==== Partners for co-operation ====
{{col-float-begin|width=22em}} {{col-float-begin|width=22em}}
''']''' ; ] States
* {{flagcountry|Algeria}} * {{flagcountry|Algeria}}
* {{flagcountry|Egypt}} * {{flagcountry|Egypt}}
Line 235: Line 317:
* {{flagcountry|Tunisia}} * {{flagcountry|Tunisia}}
{{col-float-break|width=22em}} {{col-float-break|width=22em}}
''']''' ; ]
* 1992 &nbsp; {{flagcountry|Japan}} * {{flagcountry|Japan}} (1992–present)
* 1994 &nbsp; {{flagcountry|South Korea}} * {{flagcountry|South Korea}} (1994–present)
* 2000 &nbsp; {{flagcountry|Thailand}} * {{flagcountry|Thailand}} (2000–present)
* {{flagcountry|Afghanistan|2013}} (2003–2021){{refn|Despite the Taliban's return to power in 2021, there is no current evidence that the OSCE has removed the country from its list of partners in cooperation.|group=Note}}
* 2003 &nbsp; {{flagcountry|Afghanistan|2013}}
''']''' ; ]
* 2009 &nbsp; {{flagcountry|Australia}}<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.osce.org/partners-for-cooperation|title=OSCE - Partners for Co-operation|website=www.osce.org|access-date=20 January 2022}}</ref> * {{flagcountry|Australia}}<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.osce.org/partners-for-cooperation |title=OSCE - Partners for Co-operation |website=www.osce.org |access-date=20 January 2022 |archive-date=20 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220120124057/https://www.osce.org/partners-for-cooperation |url-status=live }}</ref> (2009–present)
{{col-float-end}} {{col-float-end}}


== Legal status == == Legal status ==
{{refimprove-section|date=February 2022}} {{more citations needed section|date=February 2022}}
A unique aspect of the OSCE is the non-binding status of its constitutive charter. Rather than being a formal ] ratified by national ]s, the Helsinki Final Act represents a political commitment by the ] of all signatories to build security and cooperation in Europe on the basis of its provisions. This allows the OSCE to remain a flexible ''process'' for the evolution of improved cooperation, which avoids disputes and/or sanctions over implementation.<ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513230327/http://www.osce.org/secretariat/36184 |date=13 May 2013 }}", OSCE Secretariat</ref> A unique aspect of the OSCE is the non-binding status of its constitutive charter. Rather than being a formal ] ratified by national ]s, the Helsinki Final Act represents a political commitment by the ] of all signatories to build security and cooperation in Europe on the basis of its provisions. This allows the OSCE to remain a flexible ''process'' for the evolution of improved cooperation, which avoids disputes and/or sanctions over implementation.<ref name="ReferenceA">" {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513230327/http://www.osce.org/secretariat/36184 |date=13 May 2013}}", OSCE Secretariat</ref>


By agreeing to these commitments, signatories for the first time accepted that treatment of citizens ''within'' their borders was also a matter of legitimate international concern. This open process of the OSCE is often given credit for helping build democracy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, thus leading to the end of the Cold War{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}}. Unlike most international intergovernmental organizations, however, the OSCE does not have international legal personality on account of the lack of legal effect of its charter.<ref>" {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513230327/http://www.osce.org/secretariat/36184 |date=13 May 2013 }}", OSCE Secretariat</ref> As a result, its headquarters' host, ], had to confer legal personality on the organization in order to be able to sign a legal agreement regarding its presence in ]. By agreeing to these commitments, signatories for the first time accepted that treatment of citizens ''within'' their borders was also a matter of legitimate international concern. This open process of the OSCE is often given credit for helping build democracy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, thus leading to the end of the Cold War{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}}. Unlike most international intergovernmental organizations, however, the OSCE does not have international legal personality on account of the lack of legal effect of its charter.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> As a result, its headquarters' host, ], had to confer legal personality on the organization in order to be able to sign a legal agreement regarding its presence in ].


== Structure and institutions == == Structure and institutions ==
Political direction to the organization is given by heads of state or government during summits. Summits are not regular or scheduled but held as needed. The last summit took place in Astana (Kazakhstan), on 1 and 2 December 2010. The high-level decision-making body of the organization is the OSCE Ministerial Council, which meets at the end of every year. At the ambassadorial level, the OSCE Permanent Council convenes weekly in Vienna and serves as the regular negotiating and decision-making body. The chairperson of the Permanent Council is the ambassador to the Organization of the participating State which holds the chairmanship. Political direction to the organization is given by heads of state or government during summits. Summits are not regular or scheduled but held as needed.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Summits |url=https://www.osce.org/summits |access-date=2022-06-08 |website=www.osce.org |language=en |archive-date=14 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220614220049/https://www.osce.org/summits |url-status=live }}</ref> The last summit took place in Astana (Kazakhstan), on 1 and 2 December 2010. The high-level decision-making body of the organization is the OSCE Ministerial Council, which meets at the end of every year. At the ambassadorial level, the OSCE Permanent Council convenes weekly in Vienna and serves as the regular negotiating and decision-making body. The chairman of the Permanent Council is the ambassador to the Organization of the participating State which holds the chairmanship.


In addition to the Ministerial Council and Permanent Council, the Forum for Security Co-operation is also an OSCE decision-making body. It deals predominantly with matters of military co-operation, such as modalities for inspections according to the Vienna Document of 1999.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/documents/fsc/1999/11/4265_en.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050430191753/http://www.osce.org/documents/fsc/1999/11/4265_en.pdf|title=Vienna Document 1999 of the Negotiations on Confidence- and Security-building Measures|publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe|date=16 November 1999|archive-date=30 April 2005|access-date=21 May 2016}}</ref> In addition to the Ministerial Council and Permanent Council, the Forum for Security Co-operation is also an OSCE decision-making body. It deals predominantly with matters of military co-operation, such as modalities for inspections according to the Vienna Document of 1999.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/documents/fsc/1999/11/4265_en.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050430191753/http://www.osce.org/documents/fsc/1999/11/4265_en.pdf |title=Vienna Document 1999 of the Negotiations on Confidence- and Security-building Measures |publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe |date=16 November 1999 |archive-date=30 April 2005 |access-date=21 May 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


The OSCE's Secretariat is located in ], ]. The organization also has offices in ], ], ], ] and ]. The OSCE's Secretariat is located in ], ]. The organization also has offices in ], ], ], ] and ].


] in ], ]]] ] in ], ]]]
{{As of|2016|03}}, the OSCE employed 3,462 staff, including 513 in its secretariat and institutions and 2,949 in its 17 field operations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/whatistheosce/factsheet?download=true|title=What is the OSCE?|publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe|page=7|access-date=1 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160326185933/http://www.osce.org/whatistheosce/factsheet?download=true|archive-date=26 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> {{As of|2021|10}}, the OSCE employed 3,568 staff, including 609 in its secretariat and institutions and 2,959 in its 17&nbsp;field operations.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/whatistheosce/factsheet?download=true |title=What is the OSCE? |publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe |page=7 |access-date=1 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160326185933/http://www.osce.org/whatistheosce/factsheet?download=true |archive-date=26 March 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref>


The ] is made up of 323 parliamentarians from 57 member states. The Parliamentary Assembly performs its functions mainly via the Standing Committee, the Bureau, and 3 General Committees (Committee on Political Affairs and Security, Committee on Economic Affairs, Science, Technology and Environment, and Committee on Democracy, Human Rights and Humanitarian Questions).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/pa/260596?download=true|title=The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly|website=osce.org|access-date=17 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118011354/http://www.osce.org/pa/260596?download=true|archive-date=18 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> The ] is made up of 323&nbsp;parliamentarians from 57&nbsp;member states. The Parliamentary Assembly performs its functions mainly via the Standing Committee, the Bureau, and 3&nbsp;General Committees (Committee on Political Affairs and Security, Committee on Economic Affairs, Science, Technology and Environment, and Committee on Democracy, Human Rights and Humanitarian Questions).<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/pa/260596?download=true |title=The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly |website=osce.org |access-date=17 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118011354/http://www.osce.org/pa/260596?download=true |archive-date=18 January 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref>


The Parliamentary Assembly passes resolutions on matters such as political and security affairs, economic and environmental issues, and democracy and human rights. Representing the collective voice of OSCE parliamentarians, these resolutions and recommendations are meant to ensure that all participating states live up to their OSCE commitments. The Parliamentary Assembly also engages in parliamentary diplomacy, and has an extensive election observation program. The Parliamentary Assembly passes resolutions on matters such as political and security affairs, economic and environmental issues, and democracy and human rights. Representing the collective voice of OSCE parliamentarians, these resolutions and recommendations are meant to ensure that all participating states live up to their OSCE commitments. The Parliamentary Assembly also engages in parliamentary diplomacy, and has an extensive election observation program.


] in ], the seat of the ]]] ] in ], the seat of the ]]]
The oldest OSCE institution is the ] (ODIHR), established in 1991 following a decision made at the 1990 ]. It is based in ], ], and is active throughout the OSCE area in the fields of ], democratic development, human rights, tolerance and non-discrimination, rule of law, and ] and ] issues. The ODIHR has observed over 300 elections and referendums since 1995, sending more than 50,000 observers. It has operated outside its own area twice, sending a team that offered technical support to the 9 October 2004 presidential elections in ], an OSCE Partner for Co-operation, and an election support team to assist with parliamentary and provincial council elections on 18 September 2005. ODIHR is headed by ], Italy. The oldest OSCE institution is the ] (ODIHR), established in 1991 following a decision made at the 1990 ]. It is based in ], ], and is active throughout the OSCE area in the fields of ], democratic development, human rights, tolerance and non-discrimination, rule of law, and ] and ] issues. The ODIHR has observed over 300&nbsp;elections and referendums since 1995, sending more than 50,000 observers. It has operated outside its own area twice, sending a team that offered technical support to the 9 October 2004 presidential elections in ], an OSCE Partner for Co-operation, and an election support team to assist with parliamentary and provincial council elections on 18 September 2005. ODIHR is headed by ], Italy.


The Office of the ], established in December 1997, acts as a watchdog to provide early warning on violations of ] in OSCE participating States. The representative also assists participating States by advocating and promoting full compliance with OSCE norms, principles and commitments regarding freedom of expression and free media. As of 2020, the current representative is ], Portugal. The Office of the ], established in December 1997, acts as a watchdog to provide early warning on violations of ] in OSCE participating States. The representative also assists participating States by advocating and promoting full compliance with OSCE norms, principles and commitments regarding freedom of expression and free media. As of 2020, the current representative is ], Portugal.


The ] was created on 8 July 1992 by the Helsinki Summit Meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. It is charged with identifying and seeking early resolution of ethnic tension that might endanger peace, stability or friendly relations between participating states. As of 2020, the current representative is ] (]). The ] was created on 8 July 1992 by the Helsinki Summit Meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. It is charged with identifying and seeking early resolution of ethnic tension that might endanger peace, stability or friendly relations between participating states. As of 2020, the current representative is ] (]).


Each year the OSCE holds an OSCE Asian Conference with partner nations (currently Australia, Thailand, South Korea, Japan and Afghanistan).<ref name="osceasianconf">{{cite web|title=2017 OSCE Asian Conference|url=http://www.osce.org/event/2017-osce-asian-conference|publisher=OSCE|access-date=5 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170630150147/http://www.osce.org/event/2017-osce-asian-conference|archive-date=30 June 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Each year the OSCE holds an OSCE Asian Conference with partner nations (currently Australia, Thailand, South Korea, Japan and Afghanistan).<ref name="osceasianconf">{{cite web |title=2017 OSCE Asian Conference |url=http://www.osce.org/event/2017-osce-asian-conference |publisher=OSCE |access-date=5 July 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170630150147/http://www.osce.org/event/2017-osce-asian-conference |archive-date=30 June 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref>


The OSCE and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic established the OSCE Academy in 2002. The aim of the OSCE Academy is "to promote regional cooperation, conflict prevention and good governance in Central Asia through offering post-graduate education, professional training and intellectual exchange."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://osce-academy.net/en/about/history/|title=History of the Academy :: OSCE Academy in Bishkek|website=osce-academy.net}}</ref> The OSCE and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic established the OSCE Academy in 2002. The aim of the OSCE Academy is "to promote regional cooperation, conflict prevention and good governance in Central Asia through offering post-graduate education, professional training and intellectual exchange."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://osce-academy.net/en/about/history/ |title=History of the Academy :: OSCE Academy in Bishkek |website=osce-academy.net |access-date=17 February 2022 |archive-date=17 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220217092257/https://osce-academy.net/en/about/history/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


===List=== === List ===
* Court of Conciliation and Arbitration * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 284: Line 366:
* Secretariat * Secretariat


==Field operations== == Field operations ==
Almost all field operations of OSCE have been conducted in countries of former Yugoslavia and the former Soviet Union. Almost all field operations of OSCE have been conducted in countries of former Yugoslavia and the former Soviet Union.


===Discontinued=== === Active ===
The following field missions are currently active:<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.osce.org/where-we-are | title=Where we are | access-date=1 December 2022 | archive-date=1 December 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221201112100/https://www.osce.org/where-we-are | url-status=live }}</ref>
* Missions of Long Duration (8 September 1992 – July 1993) closed
* Mission to Georgia (November 1992 – 31 December 2008) closed
* Mission to Estonia (15 February 1993 – 31 December 2001) closed
* Mission to Latvia (19 November 1993 – 31 December 2001) closed
* Mission to Ukraine (24 November 1994 – 30 April 1999) closed
* Representative to the Estonian Expert Commission on Military Pensioners (1994 – 2006) mandate terminated
* Liaison Office in Central Asia (16 March 1995 – June 1995) closed
* Representative to the Joint Committee on the ] (6 April 1995 – 31 October 1999) disbanded
* Assistance Group to Chechnya (26 April 1995 – 16 December 1998) closed
* Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office for Dayton Article IV (1995 – 2015) discontinued
* ] (July 1996 – December 2007) closed
* Advisory and Monitoring Group in Belarus (January 1998 – 31 December 2002) closed
* Kosovo Verification Mission (October 1998 – June 1999) closed
* Office in Yerevan (16 February 2000 – 31 August 2017) closed
* Office in Baku (2014 – 31 December 2015) closed
* Office in Minsk (1 January 2003 – 31 March 2011) closed


{| class="wikitable"
===Active===
! Mission
* Presence in Albania (since 1997)
! Region
* Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina (since 1995, ])
! Deployed
* Mission in Kosovo (since 1999)
! Notes
* Mission to Montenegro
* Mission to Serbia (since 2001)
* Mission to Skopje (since 2001, ] (in the agreement Republic of Macedonia, today ])
* Mission to Moldova (since 1992, ])
* Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine (since 1993, during the ])
* ] (since 2014, during the ])
* Observer Mission at the Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk (since 2014, during the War in Donbas)
* Personal Representative of the Chairperson-in-Office on the Conflict Dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference (since 1995, ])
* Centre in Ashgabat (])
* Programme Office in Nur-Sultan (])
* Programme Office in Bishkek (])
* Programme Office in Dushanbe (])
* Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan

== Chairmanship ==
], Vienna]]
The OSCE chairmanship is assumed at yearly intervals by one participating state, which then plays the central role in managing the organization's work and in its external representation. The foreign minister of the country possessing the chair holds the OSCE's most senior position as ] (CiO).

The responsibilities of the Chairperson-in-Office include:
* co-ordination of the work of OSCE institutions;
* representing the OSCE;
* supervising activities related to conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation.

The CiO is assisted by the previous and incoming chairpersons-in-office; the three of them together constitute the OSCE ].<ref>{{cite web|title=The OSCE Chair-in-Office (CiO)|url=http://www.international.gc.ca/osce/chairman-president.aspx?lang=eng|website=Global Affairs. international.gc.ca|publisher=Government of Canada|access-date=12 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141112221325/http://www.international.gc.ca/osce/chairman-president.aspx?lang=eng|archive-date=12 November 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref> The CiO nominates Personal Representatives – experts in fields of priority for the CiO.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Chairperson-in-Office Representatives|url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/chairperson-in-office-representatives|access-date=2021-01-14|website=www.osce.org|language=en}}</ref> The origin of the institution lies with the Charter of Paris for a New Europe (1990), and the Helsinki Document (1992) formally institutionalized this function.<ref>{{cite web|title=Who we are|url=http://www.osce.org/sq/node/108325|website=osce.org|publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe|access-date=12 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141112204256/http://www.osce.org/sq/node/108325|archive-date=12 November 2014|url-status=live}}</ref>

The OSCE Chair for 2022 is ],<ref>{{Cite web|title=OSCE Chairpersonship|url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship|access-date=2022-01-04|website=www.osce.org|language=en}}</ref> represented by ] as Chairperson-in-Office.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Zbigniew Rau|url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/chairperson-in-office|access-date=2022-01-04|website=www.osce.org|language=en}}</ref>

== Secretary General ==
While the Chairperson-in-Office is the OSCE's most senior official, on a day-to-day basis the Secretary General is the OSCE's ] and can, when requested by the Chairmanship, serve as a representative of the Chairperson-in-Office. Since the establishment of the office in 1992, Secretary Generals have been:
# {{flagicon|GER}} {{Interlanguage link multi|Wilhelm Höynck|de}} (1993–1996)
# {{flagicon|ITA}} Giancarlo Aragona (1996–1999)
# {{flagicon|SVK}} ] (1999–2005)
# {{flagicon|FRA}} ] (2005–2011)
# {{flagicon|ITA}} ] (2011–2017)
# {{flagicon|CHE}} ] (2017–2020)
# {{flagicon|GER}} ] (2020–)

== Summits of heads of state and government ==
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%;line-height:1.3em;"
! Summit !! Date !! Location !! Country !! Decisions
|- |-
| ]
| I ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 30 July – 1 August 1975 || Helsinki ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}}
| {{ALB}}
| Closing of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE). Signing of the ].
| 1999
|
|- |-
| | ]
| II ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 19–21 November 1990 || Paris ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|France}}
| {{BIH}}
| (Second CSCE Summit). Signing of the ] for a New Europe (Paris Charter), the Vienna Confidence and Security Building Measures (CSBM) Document and the ] Treaty.
| 1995
| ]
|- |-
| ]
| III ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 9–10 July 1992 || Helsinki ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}}
| {{KOS}}
| Final Document: ''The Challenges of Change''. Creation of the High Commissioner on National Minorities, the Forum for Security Co-operation and the Economic Forum. Suspension of ] from membership.
| 1999
| ]
|- |-
| ]
| IV ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 1994 || Budapest ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Hungary}}
| {{MNE}}
| Final Document: ''Towards a Genuine Partnership in a New Era''. Approval of a multi-national peace-keeping force to ]. Endorsement of the Code of Conduct on politico-military aspects of security.
| 2006
|
|- |-
| ]
| V ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 2–3 December 1996 || Lisbon ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Portugal}}
| {{SRB}}
| (First OSCE Summit). ''Lisbon Declaration on a Common and Comprehensive Security Model for Europe for the Twenty-First Century''. Adoption of a Framework for Arms Control.
| 2001
|
|- |-
| ]
| VI ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 18–19 November 1999 || Istanbul ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Turkey}}
| {{MKD}}
| Signing of the Istanbul Document and the Charter for European Security.
| 2001
| ]
|- |-
| ]
| VII ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 1–2 December 2010 || Astana ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Kazakhstan}}
| {{MLD}}
| Adoption of the Astana Commemorative Declaration, which reconfirms the Organization's comprehensive approach to security based on trust and transparency.
| 1992
|}
| ]

=== Ministerial Council Meetings (ordinary) ===
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%;line-height:1.3em;"
! Council !! Date !! Location !! Country !! Decisions
|- |-
| Centre in Ashgabat
| 1st ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 19–20 June 1991 || Berlin ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Germany}}
| {{TKM}}
| Admission of Albania
| 1999
|
|- |-
| Programme Office in Astana
| 2nd ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 30–31 January 1992 || Prague ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Czechoslovakia}}
| {{KAZ}}
| Admission of ten former Soviet republics.
| 1998
|
|- |-
| Programme Office in Bishkek
| 3rd ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 14–15 December 1992 || Stockholm ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Sweden}}
| {{KGZ}}
| Creation of the post of Secretary General and appointment of ] as first High Commissioner on National Minorities.
| 1998
|
|- |-
| Programme Office in Dushanbe
| 4th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 30 November – 1 December 1993 || Rome ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Italy}}
| {{TJK}}
| Establishment of the Mission to Tajikistan.
| 1994
|
|- |-
| Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
| 5th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 7–8 December 1995 || Budapest ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Hungary}}
| {{UZB}}
| Establishment of the Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina to carry out the tasks assigned to the OSCE in the ].
| 1995
|-
| 6th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 18–19 December 1997 || Copenhagen ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Denmark}}
| Creation of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities and the Representative on Freedom of the Media.
|-
| 7th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 2–3 December 1998 || Oslo ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Norway}}
| |
|- |-
| Personal Representative of the Chairman-in-Office on the Conflict Dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference
| 8th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 27–28 November 2000 || Vienna ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Austria}}
| {{ARM}}<br>{{AZE}}
| Vienna Declaration on the OSCE's activities in South-Eastern Europe. Re-admission of ].Teija Egan Evans
| 1995
| ]
|}

=== Discontinued ===
The following field missions have been completed, closed or discontinued:<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.osce.org/closed-field-operations | title=Closed field operations and related field activities | access-date=1 December 2022 | archive-date=1 December 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221201113009/https://www.osce.org/closed-field-operations | url-status=live }}</ref>

{| class="wikitable"
! Mission
! Region
! Start
! End
! Notes
|- |-
| Missions of Long Duration in Kosovo, Sandjak and Vojvodina
| 9th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 3–4 December 2001 || Bucharest ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Romania}}
| {{flagicon image|Flag of Serbia and Montenegro (1992–2006).svg}} ] <br> {{flagicon image|}} &nbsp;'''∟''' ] <br> {{flagicon image|}} &nbsp;'''∟''' ] <br> {{flagicon image|}} &nbsp;'''∟''' ]
| Bucharest Declaration. Bucharest Plan of Action for Combating Terrorism. Creation of the Strategic Police Matters Unit and a Senior Police Adviser in the OSCE Secretariat.
| 8 September 1992
| July 1993
| ]
|- |-
| Mission to Georgia
| 10th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2002 || Porto ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Portugal}}
| {{GEO}}
| Porto Declaration: ''Responding to Change''. OSCE Charter on Preventing and Combating Terrorism.
| November 1992
| 31 December 2008
|
|- |-
| Mission to Estonia
| 11th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 1–2 December 2003 || Maastricht ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Netherlands}}
| {{EST}}
| Strategy to Address Threats to Security and Stability in the Twenty-First Century. Strategy Document for the Economic and Environmental Dimension.
| 15 February 1993
| 31 December 2001
|
|- |-
| Mission to Latvia
| 12th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2004 || Sofia ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Bulgaria}}
| {{LAT}}
|
| 19 November 1993
| 31 December 2001
|
|- |-
| Mission to Ukraine
| 13th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 2005 || Ljubljana ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Slovenia}}
| {{UKR}}
| Statement on the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism. Approval of the Border Security and Management Concept.
| 24 November 1994
| 30 April 1999
|
|- |-
| Representative to the Estonian Expert Commission on Military Pensioners
| 14th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 4–5 December 2006 || Brussels ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Belgium}}
| {{EST}}
| Brussels Declaration on Criminal Justice Systems. Ministerial Statement on Supporting and Promoting the International Legal Framework against Terrorism.
| 1994
| 1996
|
|- |-
| Liaison Office in Central Asia
| 15th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 29–30 November 2007 || Madrid ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Spain}}
| {{UZB}}
| Madrid Declaration on Environment and Security. Ministerial Statement on Supporting the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy.
| 16 March 1995
| December 2000
|
|- |-
| Representative to the Joint Committee on the ]
| 16th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 4–5 December 2008 || Helsinki ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}}
| {{LAT}}
|
| 6 April 1995
| 31 October 1999
|
|- |-
| Assistance Group to Chechnya
| 17th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 1–2 December 2009 || Athens ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Greece}}
| {{RUS}} <br> {{flagicon image|}} &nbsp;'''∟''' ]
| Ministerial Declarations on Non-Proliferation and on the OSCE Corfu Process.
| 26 April 1995
| 16 December 1998
| ]
|- |-
| Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office for Article IV, Annex 1-B of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina
| ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 16–17 July 2010 || Almaty ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Kazakhstan}}
| {{BIH}}
| Informal discussions on Corfu Process progress, the situation in Kyrgyzstan and the forthcoming OSCE summit.
| 1995
| 2015
| ]
|- |-
| ] / Office in Zagreb
| 18th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2011 || Vilnius ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Lithuania}}
| {{CRO}}
| Decisions on responses to conflicts and transnational threats; to enhance capabilities in early warning; early action; dialogue facilitation and mediation support; and post-conflict rehabilitation. Decisions to enhance engagement with OSCE Partners for Co-operation, Afghanistan in particular.
| July 1996
| 17 January 2012
| ]
|- |-
| Advisory and Monitoring Group in Belarus
| 19th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2012 || Dublin ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Ireland}}
| {{BLR}}
|Helsinki+40 Process: clear path to the 2015 40th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, intent to reinforce and revitalize the OSCE; unanimous support for Transnistrian settlement process: negotiated, comprehensive, just and viable ]; strengthening good ]: deepening engagement in preventing and countering ], addressing transnational threats, and adding an ] framework to earlier decisions on threats from ], drugs and chemical precursors and strategic policing; despite Ireland's hopes, a decision on human rights was ''not'' reached: greater, still, was concern for the council's trend of human rights decision-failures.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/event/mc_2012|title=19th OSCE Ministerial Council|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171111214904/http://www.osce.org/event/mc_2012|archive-date=11 November 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
| January 1998
| 31 December 2002
|
|- |-
| ] / Task force for Kosovo
| 20th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 2013 || Kyiv ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Ukraine}}
| {{flagicon image|Flag of Serbia and Montenegro (1992–2006).svg}} ] <br> {{flagicon image|}} &nbsp;'''∟''' ]
|Decision on the combating trafficking in human beings. Decision on the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief. Ministerial Declaration on Strengthening the OSCE's Efforts to Address Transnational Threats. Decision on the Extension of the Mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media. Decision on the time and place of the next meeting of the OSCE Ministerial Council. Decision on the improving the environmental footprint of energy-related activities in the OSCE region. Ministerial Declaration on the Update of the OSCE Principles Governing Non-Proliferation. Decision on the enhancing OSCE efforts to implement the Action Plan on Improving the Situation of Roma and Sinti Within the OSCE Area, With a Particular Focus on Roma and Sinti Women, Youth and Children. Ministerial Statement on the Work of the Permanent Conference on Political Issues in the Framework of the Negotiation Process for the Transnistrian Settlement in the ]. Decision on the appointment of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities. Declaration on Furthering the Helsinki+40 Process. Decision on the small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Decision on the protection of energy networks from natural and man-made disasters.
| October 1998
| June 1999
| ]
|- |-
| Office in Yerevan
| 21st ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 4–5 December 2014 || Basel ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Switzerland}}
| {{ARM}}
|Declaration on further steps in the Helsinki+40 Process. Ministerial statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. Declaration on youth. Declaration on the Transfer of Ownership to the Parties to the Agreement on Sub-regional Arms Control, Annex 1B, Article IV of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Declaration on the OSCE role in countering the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters in the context of the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions 2170 (2014) and 2178 (2014). Declaration on the OSCE role in countering kidnapping and hostage-taking committed by terrorist groups in the context of the implementation of the UN Security Council resolution 2133 (2014). Decision on the prevention of corruption. Decision on enhancing disaster risk reductionDecision on preventing and combating violence against women. Decision on an addendum to the 2004 OSCE Action Plan for the Promotion of Gender Equality. Ministerial commemorative declaration on the seventieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War. Declaration on enhancing efforts to combat anti-Semitism. Declaration on co-operation with the Mediterranean Partners. Ministerial declaration on co-operation with the Asian Partners. Decision on small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Commemorative Declaration on the Occasion of the Twentieth Anniversary of the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security.
| 16 February 2000
| 31 August 2017
|
|- |-
| Office in Baku / Project Co-ordinator in Baku
| 22nd ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 3–4 December 2015 || Belgrade ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Serbia}}
| {{AZE}}
|Ministerial Declaration on Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism and Radicalization that lead to Terrorism. Declaration on the OSCE Activities in Support of Global Efforts in Tackling the World Drug Problem. Ministerial Declaration on Reinforcing OSCE Efforts to Counter Terrorism in the Wake of Recent Terrorist Attacks. Declaration on Youth and Security. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format.
| July 2000
| 31 December 2015
|
|- |-
| Office in Minsk
| 23st ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 8–9 December 2016 || Hamburg ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Germany}}
| {{BLR}}
|Decision on the OSCE's role in the governance of large movements of migrants and refugees. Decision on strengthening good governance and promoting connectivity. Decision on OSCE efforts related to reducing the risks of conflict stemming from the use of information and communication technologies. Declaration on strengthening OSCE efforts to prevent and counter terrorism. Decision on enhancing the use of Advance Passenger Information. Ministerial statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format.
| 1 January 2003
| 31 March 2011
|
|- |-
| Observer Mission at the Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk
| 24th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 7–8 December 2017 || Vienna ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Austria}}
| {{RUS}}
|Decision on enhancing OSCE efforts to reduce the risk of conflict stemming from the use of information and communication technologies. Decision on strengthening efforts to prevent trafficking in human beings. Decision on strengthening efforts to combat all forms of child trafficking, including for sexual exploitation, as well as other forms of sexual exploitation of children. Decision on promoting economic participation in the OSCE area. Decision on small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Ministerial Statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian settlement process in the 5+2 format. Decisions on the appointment of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, the Representative on Freedom of the Media, the Director of the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, and the Secretary General.
| 24 July 2014
| 30 September 2021
|
|- |-
| ]
| 25th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2018 || Milan ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Italy}}
| {{UKR}}
|Decision on the OSCE Chairmanship in the Year 2020. Decision on the Time and Place of the Next Meeting of the OSCE Ministerial Council. Decision on Safety of Journalists. Decision on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women. Decision on Human Capital Development in the Digital Era. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. Declaration on the Digital Economy a Driver for Promoting Co-operation, Security and Growth. Declaration on the Role of Youth in Contribution to Peace and Security Efforts. Declaration on Security and Co-operation in the Mediterranean. Declaration on OSCE Efforts in the Field of Norms and Best Practices on Small Arms and Light Weapons and Stockpiles of Conventional Ammunition.
| March 2014
| March 2022
| ]
|- |-
| Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine
| 26th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 2019 || Bratislava ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Slovakia}}
| {{UKR}}
|Decision on the OSCE Chairmanship in the Years 2021 and 2022. Decision on Renaming the Contact Group with the Asian Partners for Co-operation and the Contact Group with the Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation. Decision on Time and Place of the Next Meeting of the OSCE Ministerial Council. Commemorative Declaration on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the "5+2" Format. Document No.2, Commemorative. Declaration on the Occasion of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the OSCE Principles Governing Non-Proliferation and Fifteenth Anniversary of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540.
| June 1999
| March 2022
|
|- |-
| ]
| 27th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 3–4 December 2020 || Tirana ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Albania}}
| {{ARM}}
|Decision on the appointment of the OSCE Secretary General. Decision on the appointment of the Director of the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Decision on the appointment of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities. Decision on the appointment of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media. Decision on the OSCE Chairmanship in the year 2023. Decision on Preventing and Combating Corruption through Digitalization and Increased Transparency. Decision on Prevention and Eradication of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Decision on the Time and Place of the Next Meeting of the OSCE Ministerial Council. Declaration on Strengthening Co-operation in Countering Transnational Organized Crime. Declaration on Co-operation With the OSCE Asian Partners. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format.
| 21 October 2022
| 27 October 2022
| ]
|- |-
| 28th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 2–3 December 2021 || Stockholm ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Sweden}}
|} |}

== Chairmanship ==
], Vienna]]
The OSCE chairmanship is assumed at yearly intervals by one participating state, which then plays the central role in managing the organization's work and in its external representation. The foreign minister of the country possessing the chair holds the OSCE's most senior position as ] (CiO).

The responsibilities of the chairman-in-office include:
* co-ordination of the work of OSCE institutions;
* representing the OSCE;
* supervising activities related to conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation.

The CiO is assisted by the previous and incoming chairmen-in-office; the three of them together constitute the OSCE ].<ref>{{cite web |title=The OSCE Chair-in-Office (CiO) |url=http://www.international.gc.ca/osce/chairman-president.aspx?lang=eng |website=Global Affairs. international.gc.ca |publisher=Government of Canada |access-date=12 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141112221325/http://www.international.gc.ca/osce/chairman-president.aspx?lang=eng |archive-date=12 November 2014 |url-status=dead}}</ref> The CiO nominates personal representatives – experts in fields of priority for the CiO.<ref>{{Cite web |title=chairman-in-Office Representatives |url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/chairperson-in-office-representatives |access-date=2021-01-14 |website=www.osce.org |language=en |archive-date=15 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210115094530/https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/chairperson-in-office-representatives |url-status=live }}</ref> The origin of the institution lies with the Charter of Paris for a New Europe (1990), and the Helsinki Document (1992) formally institutionalized this function.<ref>{{cite web |title=Who we are|url=http://www.osce.org/sq/node/108325 |website=osce.org |publisher=Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe |access-date=12 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141112204256/http://www.osce.org/sq/node/108325 |archive-date=12 November 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>

The OSCE chair for 2022 was ],<ref>{{Cite web |title=OSCE Chairpersonship |url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship |access-date=2022-01-04 |website=www.osce.org |language=en |archive-date=4 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201204124915/https://www.osce.org/chairmanship |url-status=live }}</ref> with ] serving as chairman-in-office.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Zbigniew Rau |url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/chairperson-in-office |access-date=2022-01-04 |website=www.osce.org |language=en |archive-date=1 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211201085318/https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/chairperson-in-office |url-status=live }}</ref> The chair for 2023 is ], represented by ] as chairman-in-office.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/5/472932.pdf |title=Decision No. 5/20 OSCE Chairmanship in the Year 2023|date=4 December 2020|publisher=OSCE|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221213134832/https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/5/472932.pdf |archive-date=13 December 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/535161 |title=North Macedonia takes over OSCE Chair &#124; OSCE |access-date=1 January 2023 |archive-date=1 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230101172149/https://www.osce.org/chairmanship/535161 |url-status=live }}</ref>


=== Chairmanship history === === Chairmanship history ===
Chairmanship of the OSCE is held by a member state on a calendar-year basis, with the minister for foreign affairs of that state performing the function of Chairperson-in-Office. The table below shows the holders since 1991.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091230231131/http://www.osce.org/item/41439.html |date=30 December 2009 }}, December 2009, pages 20–23.</ref> Chairmanship of the OSCE is held by a member state on a calendar-year basis, with the minister for foreign affairs of that state performing the function of chairman-in-office. The table below shows the holders since 1991.<ref> {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091230231131/http://www.osce.org/item/41439.html |date=30 December 2009 }}, December 2009, pages 20–23.</ref> ] was due to hold the chairmanship in 2024, however, this was not approved following objections from ] and ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.dw.com/en/is-the-osces-future-in-crisis/a-65867647 | title=Is the OSCE's future in crisis? – DW – 06/09/2023 | website=] }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.yahoo.com/osce-may-collapse-over-belarus-102400094.html | title=OSCE may collapse over Belarus, Russia's reluctance to approve Estonia's presidency, says Finnish MFA | date=29 May 2023 }}</ref>


{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%;" {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%;"
! Year !! Country !! Chairperson-in-Office ! Year !! Country !! Chairman-in-Office
|- |-
| 1991 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Germany}} || ] (from June) | 1991 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Germany}} || ] (from June)
Line 527: Line 653:
| 2019 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Slovakia}} || ] | 2019 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Slovakia}} || ]
|- |-
| 2020 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Albania}} || ] | 2020 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Albania}} || ]
|- |-
| 2021 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Sweden}}||] | 2021 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Sweden}}||]
|- |-
| '''2022''' ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| '''{{flagcountry|Poland}}'''||''']''' | 2022 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Poland}}||]
|- |-
| 2023 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|North Macedonia}} || | 2023 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"|{{flagcountry|North Macedonia}}|| ]
|- |-
| 2024 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| || | '''2024''' ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| '''{{flagcountry|Malta}}'''||''']'''
|- |-
| 2025 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}} || | 2025 ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}} ||
|}

== Secretary general ==
While the chairman-in-office is the OSCE's most senior official, on a day-to-day basis the secretary general is the OSCE's ] and can, when requested by the chairmanship, serve as a representative of the chairman-in-office. Since the establishment of the office in 1992, the secretaries general have been:

{| class="wikitable"
! Secretary General
! Country
! Term of office
|-
| {{Interlanguage link|Wilhelm Höynck|de}}
| {{GER}}
| 1993–1996
|-
| ]
| {{ITA}}
| 1996–1999
|-
| ]
| {{SVK}}
| 1999–2005
|-
| ]
| {{FRA}}
| 2005–2011
|-
| ]
| {{ITA}}
| 2011–2017
|-
| ]
| {{CHE}}
| 2017–2020
|-
| ]
| {{GER}}
| 2020–2024
|-
|-
| ]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Feridun Sinirlioğlu |url=https://www.osce.org/node/582163 |access-date=2024-12-06 |website=www.osce.org |language=en}}</ref>
| {{TUR}}
| 2024–
|-
|}

== Summits of heads of state and government ==
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%; line-height:1.3em;"
! Summit !! Date !! Location !! Country !! Decisions
|-
| I ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 30 July – 1 August 1975 || Helsinki ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}}
| Closing of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE). Signing of the ].
|-
| II ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 19–21 November 1990 || Paris ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|France}}
| (Second CSCE Summit). Signing of the ] for a New Europe (Paris Charter), the Vienna Confidence and Security Building Measures (CSBM) Document and the ] Treaty.
|-
| III ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 9–10 July 1992 || Helsinki ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}}
| Final Document: ''The Challenges of Change''. Creation of the High Commissioner on National Minorities, the Forum for Security Co-operation and the Economic Forum. Suspension of ] from membership.
|-
| IV ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 1994 || Budapest ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Hungary}}
| Final Document: ''Towards a Genuine Partnership in a New Era''. Approval of a multi-national peace-keeping force to ]. Endorsement of the Code of Conduct on politico-military aspects of security.
|-
| V ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 2–3 December 1996 || Lisbon ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Portugal}}
| (First OSCE Summit). ''Lisbon Declaration on a Common and Comprehensive Security Model for Europe for the Twenty-First Century''. Adoption of a Framework for Arms Control.
|-
| VI ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 18–19 November 1999 || Istanbul ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Turkey}}
| Signing of the Istanbul Document and the Charter for European Security.
|-
| VII ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 1–2 December 2010 || Astana ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Kazakhstan}}
| Adoption of the Astana Commemorative Declaration, which reconfirms the Organization's comprehensive approach to security based on trust and transparency.
|}

=== Ministerial Council Meetings (ordinary) ===
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%; line-height:1.3em;"
! Council !! Date !! Location !! Country !! Decisions !! Doc
|-
| 1st ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 19–20 June 1991 || Berlin ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Germany}} || Admission of Albania ||
|-
| ||10 September 1991 || Moscow || style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Russia}} ||Question of the admission of the Republics of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. ||
|-
| 2nd ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 30–31 January 1992|| Prague ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Czechoslovakia}}
| Admission of ten former Soviet republics. ||
|-
| 3rd ||style="white-space:nowrap"| 14–15 December 1992|| Stockholm ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Sweden}}
| Creation of the post of Secretary General and appointment of ] as first High Commissioner on National Minorities. ||
|-
| 4th ||30 November –<br />1 December 1993 || Rome ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Italy}}
| Establishment of the Mission to Tajikistan. ||
|-
| 5th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 7–8 December 1995 ||Budapest ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Hungary}}
| Establishment of the Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina to carry out the tasks assigned to the OSCE in the ]. ||
|-
| 6th ||style="white-space:nowrap"| 18–19 December 1997||Copenhagen ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Denmark}}
| Creation of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities and the Representative on Freedom of the Media. ||
|-
| 7th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 2–3 December 1998 ||Oslo ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Norway}}|| ||
|-
| 8th ||style="white-space:nowrap"| 27–28 November 2000||Vienna ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Austria}}
| Vienna Declaration on the OSCE's activities in South-Eastern Europe. Re-admission of ]. ||
|-
| 9th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 3–4 December 2001 ||Bucharest ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Romania}}
| Bucharest Declaration. Bucharest Plan of Action for Combating Terrorism. Creation of the Strategic Police Matters Unit and a Senior Police Adviser in the OSCE Secretariat. ||
|-
| 10th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2002 ||Porto ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Portugal}}
| Porto Declaration: ''Responding to Change''. OSCE Charter on Preventing and Combating Terrorism. ||
|-
| 11th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 1–2 December 2003 ||Maastricht ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Netherlands}}
| Strategy to Address Threats to Security and Stability in the Twenty-First Century. Strategy Document for the Economic and Environmental Dimension. ||
|-
| 12th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2004 ||Sofia ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Bulgaria}}|| ||
|-
| 13th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 2005 ||Ljubljana ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Slovenia}}
| Statement on the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism. Approval of the Border Security and Management Concept. ||
|-
| 14th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 4–5 December 2006 ||Brussels ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Belgium}}
| Brussels Declaration on Criminal Justice Systems. Ministerial Statement on Supporting and Promoting the International Legal Framework against Terrorism. ||
|-
| 15th ||style="white-space:nowrap"| 29–30 November 2007||Madrid ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Spain}}
| Madrid Declaration on Environment and Security. Ministerial Statement on Supporting the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy. ||
|-
| 16th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 4–5 December 2008 ||Helsinki ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Finland}} || ||
|-
| 17th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 1–2 December 2009 ||Athens ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Greece}}
| Ministerial Declarations on Non-Proliferation and on the OSCE Corfu Process. ||
|-
| ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 16–17 July 2010 ||Almaty ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Kazakhstan}}
| Informal discussions on Corfu Process progress, the situation in Kyrgyzstan and the forthcoming OSCE summit. ||
|-
| 18th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2011 ||Vilnius ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Lithuania}}
| Decisions on responses to conflicts and transnational threats; to enhance capabilities in early warning; early action; dialogue facilitation and mediation support; and post-conflict rehabilitation. Decisions to enhance engagement with OSCE Partners for Co-operation, Afghanistan in particular. ||
|-
| 19th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2012 ||Dublin ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Ireland}}
|Helsinki+40 Process: clear path to the 2015 40th&nbsp;anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, intent to reinforce and revitalize the OSCE; unanimous support for Transnistrian settlement process: negotiated, comprehensive, just and viable ]; strengthening good ]: deepening engagement in preventing and countering ], addressing transnational threats, and adding an ] framework to earlier decisions on threats from ], drugs and chemical precursors and strategic policing; despite Ireland's hopes, a decision on human rights was ''not'' reached: greater, still, was concern for the council's trend of human rights decision-failures.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/event/mc_2012 |title=19th OSCE Ministerial Council |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171111214904/http://www.osce.org/event/mc_2012 |archive-date=11 November 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref> ||
|-
| 20th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 2013 ||Kyiv ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Ukraine}}
|Decision on the combating trafficking in human beings. Decision on the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief. Ministerial Declaration on Strengthening the OSCE's Efforts to Address Transnational Threats. Decision on the improving the environmental footprint of energy-related activities in the OSCE region. Ministerial Declaration on the Update of the OSCE Principles Governing Non-Proliferation. Decision on the enhancing OSCE efforts to implement the Action Plan on Improving the Situation of Roma and Sinti Within the OSCE Area, With a Particular Focus on Roma and Sinti Women, Youth and Children. Ministerial Statement on the Work of the Permanent Conference on Political Issues in the Framework of the Negotiation Process for the Transnistrian Settlement in the ]. Declaration on Furthering the Helsinki+40 Process. Decision on the small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Decision on the protection of energy networks from natural and man-made disasters. ||
|-
| 21st ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 4–5 December 2014 ||Basel ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Switzerland}}
|Declaration on further steps in the Helsinki+40 Process. Ministerial statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. Declaration on youth. Declaration on the Transfer of Ownership to the Parties to the Agreement on Sub-regional Arms Control, Annex&nbsp;1B, Article&nbsp;IV of the ]. Declaration on the OSCE role in countering the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters in the context of the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions 2170 and 2178. Declaration on the OSCE role in countering kidnapping and hostage-taking committed by terrorist groups in the context of the implementation of the UN Security Council resolution 2133. Decision on the prevention of corruption. Decision on enhancing disaster risk reduction. Decision on preventing and combating violence against women. Decision on an addendum to the 2004 OSCE Action Plan for the Promotion of Gender Equality. Ministerial commemorative declaration on the seventieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War. Declaration on enhancing efforts to combat anti-Semitism. Declaration on co-operation with the Mediterranean Partners. Ministerial declaration on co-operation with the Asian Partners. Decision on small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Commemorative Declaration on the Occasion of the Twentieth Anniversary of the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. ||
|-
| 22nd ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 3–4 December 2015 ||Belgrade ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Serbia}}
|Ministerial Declaration on Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism and Radicalization that lead to Terrorism. Declaration on the OSCE Activities in Support of Global Efforts in Tackling the World Drug Problem. Ministerial Declaration on Reinforcing OSCE Efforts to Counter Terrorism in the Wake of Recent Terrorist Attacks. Declaration on Youth and Security. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. ||
|-
| 23st ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 8–9 December 2016 ||Hamburg ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Germany}}
|Decision on the OSCE's role in the governance of large movements of migrants and refugees. Decision on strengthening good governance and promoting connectivity. Decision on OSCE efforts related to reducing the risks of conflict stemming from the use of information and communication technologies. Declaration on strengthening OSCE efforts to prevent and counter terrorism. Decision on enhancing the use of Advance Passenger Information. Ministerial statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. ||
|-
| 24th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 7–8 December 2017 ||Vienna ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Austria}}
|Decision on enhancing OSCE efforts to reduce the risk of conflict stemming from the use of information and communication technologies. Decision on strengthening efforts to prevent trafficking in human beings. Decision on strengthening efforts to combat all forms of child trafficking, including for sexual exploitation, as well as other forms of sexual exploitation of children. Decision on promoting economic participation in the OSCE area. Decision on small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Ministerial Statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian settlement process in the 5+2 format. ||
|-
| 25th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 6–7 December 2018 ||Milan ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Italy}}
|Decision on Safety of Journalists. Decision on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women. Decision on Human Capital Development in the Digital Era. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. Declaration on the Digital Economy a Driver for Promoting Co-operation, Security and Growth. Declaration on the Role of Youth in Contribution to Peace and Security Efforts. Declaration on Security and Co-operation in the Mediterranean. Declaration on OSCE Efforts in the Field of Norms and Best Practices on Small Arms and Light Weapons and Stockpiles of Conventional Ammunition. ||
|-
| 26th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 5–6 December 2019 ||Bratislava ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Slovakia}}
|Commemorative Declaration on the Occasion of the 25th&nbsp;Anniversary of the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the "5+2" Format. Document No.&nbsp;2, Commemorative. Declaration on the Occasion of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the OSCE Principles Governing Non-Proliferation and Fifteenth Anniversary of ].||
|-
| 27th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 3–4 December 2020 ||Tirana ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Albania}}
|Decision on Preventing and Combating Corruption through Digitalization and Increased Transparency. Decision on Prevention and Eradication of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Declaration on Strengthening Co-operation in Countering Transnational Organized Crime. Declaration on Co-operation With the OSCE Asian Partners. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. ||
|-
| 28th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 2–3 December 2021 ||Stockholm ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Sweden}} || ||
|-
| 29th ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| 1–2 December 2022 ||Łódź ||style="white-space:nowrap;"| {{flagcountry|Poland}}
|For the first time a delegation was not invited, Russia was not permitted to attend because of the ongoing invasion of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web |title=Russia attempting to hold OSCE hostage, chairman says |url=https://english.nv.ua/nation/russia-attempting-to-hold-osce-hostage-chairman-says-news-50288065.html |access-date=2 December 2022 |archive-date=2 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221202080731/https://english.nv.ua/nation/russia-attempting-to-hold-osce-hostage-chairman-says-news-50288065.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Margareta Cederfelt said: "This OSCE Ministerial Council should take steps to establish a high-level body to examine the damages inflicted by the Russian Federation on Ukraine, and to assess the reparations that Russia should be accountable for. Russia started this war, and it must pay for it." Most OSCE participating states support an initiative by Ukraine to create a special tribunal to prosecute Russia for the crime of aggression.<ref>{{cite web |title=Rau: Most OSCE states support creation of special tribunal to prosecute Russia |date=2 December 2022 |url=https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-polytics/3626522-rau-most-osce-states-support-creation-of-special-tribunal-to-prosecute-russia.html |access-date=2 December 2022 |archive-date=2 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221202161154/https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-polytics/3626522-rau-most-osce-states-support-creation-of-special-tribunal-to-prosecute-russia.html |url-status=live }}</ref> ||
|-
|30th
|29&nbsp;November&nbsp;– 1&nbsp;December&nbsp;2023<ref>{{Cite web |last=FoNet |date=2023-11-24 |title=Sergej Lavrov može da sleti u Skoplje |url=https://n1info.rs/region/sergej-lavrov-moze-da-sleti-u-skoplje/ |access-date=2023-11-25 |website=N1 |language=sr-RS}}</ref>
|Skopje
|{{Flag|North Macedonia}}
|
|
|-
|31st
| 5–6 December 2024<ref>{{Cite web|date=2023-11-27 |title=Neutral Malta to chair OSCE after Moscow blocks NATO member Estonia|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/neutral-malta-chair-osce-after-moscow-blocks-nato-member-estonia-2023-11-27/|access-date=2023-11-30 |website=Reuters|language=en}}</ref>
|
|{{Flag|Malta}}
|
|
|-
|32nd
|2025
|Helsinki
|{{Flag|Finland}}
|
|
|} |}


Line 543: Line 851:
Since 1993, the OSCE's budget by year (in millions of ]) has been: Since 1993, the OSCE's budget by year (in millions of ]) has been:
{{div col|colwidth=15em|content= {{div col|colwidth=15em|content=
* 2019 ... €138.2 million<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.osce.org/funding-and-budget |title=Funding and budget |access-date=18 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180818214536/https://www.osce.org/funding-and-budget |archive-date=18 August 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> * 2021 ... €138.2 million<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.osce.org/funding-and-budget |title=Funding and budget |access-date=18 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180818214536/https://www.osce.org/funding-and-budget |archive-date=18 August 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref>
* 2018 ... €137.8 million * 2020 ... €138.2 million
* 2019 ... €138.2 million
* 2018 ... €137.8 million
* 2017 ... €139.0 million * 2017 ... €139.0 million
* 2016 ... €141.1 million * 2016 ... €141.1 million
Line 574: Line 884:


{{Graph:Chart {{Graph:Chart
| width = 540 | width= 540
| xAxisTitle = Year | xAxisTitle= Year
| x = 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 | x = 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021
| yAxisTitle = Budget (€) | yAxisTitle = Budget (€)
| yAxisFormat = s | yAxisFormat= s
| y = 12000000, 21000000, 18900000, 34900000, 43400000, 118700000, 146100000, 202700000, 194500000, 167500000, 165500000, 180800000, 186600000, 186200000, 186200000, 164100000, 158600000, 150700000, 150000000, 148400000, 144800000, 142300000, 141100000, 141100000, 139000000, 137800000, 138200000 | y= 12000000, 21000000, 18900000, 34900000, 43400000, 118700000, 146100000, 202700000, 194500000, 167500000, 165500000, 180800000, 186600000, 186200000, 186200000, 164100000, 158600000, 150700000, 150000000, 148400000, 144800000, 142300000, 141100000, 141100000, 139000000, 137800000, 138200000, 138200000, 138200000
| showSymbols = |yGrid= | showSymbols= |yGrid=
}} }}


== Relations with the United Nations == == Relations with the United Nations ==
The OSCE considers itself a regional organization in the sense of ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/ec/43240 |title=Secretariat - External Cooperation |publisher=OSCE |access-date=4 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728173159/http://www.osce.org/ec/43240 |archive-date=28 July 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> and is an ] in the ].<ref name="UN_ARES485">{{UN document |docid=A-RES-48-5 |type=Resolution |body=General Assembly |session=48 |resolution_number=5 |accessdate=2008-10-01 |date=22 October 1993 |title=Observer status for the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe in the General Assembly}}</ref> The Chairperson-in-Office gives routine briefings to the ].<ref>{{UN document |docid=S-PV-5982 |body=Security Council |type=Verbatim Report |meeting=5982 |page=2 |anchor=pg002-bk06 |date=26 September 2008 |speakername=Mr. Stubb | speakernation=Finland |accessdate=2008-10-01 }}</ref> The OSCE considers itself a regional organization in the sense of ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/ec/43240 |title=Secretariat - External Cooperation |publisher=OSCE |access-date=4 February 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728173159/http://www.osce.org/ec/43240 |archive-date=28 July 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> and is an ] in the ].<ref name="UN_ARES485">{{UN document |docid=A-RES-48-5 |type=Resolution |body=General Assembly |session=48 |resolution_number=5 |accessdate=2008-10-01 |date=22 October 1993 |title=Observer status for the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe in the General Assembly}}</ref> The Chairman-in-Office gives routine briefings to the ].<ref>{{UN document |docid=S-PV-5982 |body=Security Council |type=Verbatim Report |meeting=5982 |page=2 |anchor=pg002-bk06 |date=26 September 2008 |speakername=Mr. Stubb | speakernation=Finland |accessdate=2008-10-01}}</ref>


==The three dimensions== ==The three dimensions==
Line 590: Line 900:
The OSCE takes a comprehensive approach to the politico-military dimension of security, which includes a number of commitments by participating States and mechanisms for conflict prevention and resolution. The organization also seeks to enhance military security by promoting greater openness, transparency and co-operation. The OSCE takes a comprehensive approach to the politico-military dimension of security, which includes a number of commitments by participating States and mechanisms for conflict prevention and resolution. The organization also seeks to enhance military security by promoting greater openness, transparency and co-operation.


; ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/what/arms-control|title=Arms control|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118231829/http://www.osce.org/what/arms-control|archive-date=18 November 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> ; ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/what/arms-control |title=Arms control |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118231829/http://www.osce.org/what/arms-control |archive-date=18 November 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The end of the Cold War resulted in a huge amount of surplus weapons becoming available in what is known as the international ] for weapons. The OSCE helps to stop the—often illegal—spread of such weapons and offers assistance with their destruction. The OSCE hosts the annual exchange of information under the ] treaty. The OSCE has also implemented two additional exchanges of information, the ] and the ]. The ], the implementing body for the ], meets monthly at its Vienna headquarters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/oscc|title=Open Skies Consultative Commission|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180215024333/http://www.osce.org/oscc|archive-date=15 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> The end of the Cold War resulted in a huge amount of surplus weapons becoming available in what is known as the international ] for weapons. The OSCE helps to stop the—often illegal—spread of such weapons and offers assistance with their destruction. The OSCE hosts the annual exchange of information under the ] treaty. The OSCE has also implemented two additional exchanges of information, the ] and the ]. The ], the implementing body for the ], meets monthly at its Vienna headquarters.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/oscc |title=Open Skies Consultative Commission |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180215024333/http://www.osce.org/oscc |archive-date=15 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>


; Border management<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/what/borders|title=Border management|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161129124531/http://www.osce.org/what/borders|archive-date=29 November 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> ; Border management<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/what/borders |title=Border management |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161129124531/http://www.osce.org/what/borders |archive-date=29 November 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The actions taken by the OSCE in border monitoring range from conflict prevention to post-conflict management, capacity building and institutional support. The actions taken by the OSCE in border monitoring range from conflict prevention to post-conflict management, capacity building and institutional support.


; Combating terrorism<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/what/terrorism|title=Combating terrorism|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118232004/http://www.osce.org/what/terrorism|archive-date=18 November 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> ; Combating terrorism<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/what/terrorism |title=Combating terrorism |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118232004/http://www.osce.org/what/terrorism |archive-date=18 November 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref>
With its expertise in conflict prevention, crisis management and early warning, the OSCE contributes to worldwide efforts in ]. With its expertise in conflict prevention, crisis management and early warning, the OSCE contributes to worldwide efforts in ].


; Conflict prevention<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/what/conflict-prevention|title=Conflict prevention and resolution|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118231839/http://www.osce.org/what/conflict-prevention|archive-date=18 November 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/cpc|title=Conflict prevention and resolution|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140315201005/http://www.osce.org/cpc|archive-date=15 March 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> ; Conflict prevention<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/what/conflict-prevention |title=Conflict prevention and resolution |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161118231839/http://www.osce.org/what/conflict-prevention |archive-date=18 November 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/cpc |title=Conflict prevention and resolution |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140315201005/http://www.osce.org/cpc |archive-date=15 March 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The OSCE works to prevent conflicts from arising and to facilitate lasting comprehensive political settlements for existing conflicts. It also helps with the process of rehabilitation in post-conflict areas. The OSCE works to prevent conflicts from arising and to facilitate lasting comprehensive political settlements for existing conflicts. It also helps with the process of rehabilitation in post-conflict areas.


Line 611: Line 921:
The OSCE was a rather small organization until selection by the international community to provide electoral organization to post war Bosnia and Herzegovina in early 1996. Ambassador Frowick was the first OSCE representative to initiate national election in September 1996, human rights issues and rule of law specifically designed to provide a foundation for judicial organization within Bosnia and Herzegovina. The OSCE was a rather small organization until selection by the international community to provide electoral organization to post war Bosnia and Herzegovina in early 1996. Ambassador Frowick was the first OSCE representative to initiate national election in September 1996, human rights issues and rule of law specifically designed to provide a foundation for judicial organization within Bosnia and Herzegovina.


The OSCE had regional offices and field offices, to include the office in Brcko in northeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina which remained in limbo until the Brcko Arbitration Agreement could be decided, finalized and implemented. The OSCE had regional offices and field offices, to include the office in ] in northeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina which remained in limbo until the Brcko Arbitration Agreement could be decided, finalized and implemented.


Brcko become a "special district" and remains so today. Brcko become a "special district" and remains so today.


The OSCE essentially took the place of the United Nations in Bosnia and Herzegovina in part because the Bosnian leadership felt deep contempt for the UN efforts to stop the war which began in 1991 and ended in 1995. During the time the United Nations were attempting a political solution, thousands of UN troops were posted in and around Bosnia and Herzegovina with special emphasis on Sarajevo. From 1991 to 1995, over 200,000 Bosnians were killed and over one million displaced and another million as refugees.{{citation needed|date=February 2020}} The OSCE essentially took the place of the United Nations in Bosnia and Herzegovina in part because the Bosnian leadership felt deep contempt for the UN efforts to stop the war which began in 1991 and ended in 1995. During the time the United Nations were attempting a political solution, thousands of UN troops were posted in and around Bosnia and Herzegovina with special emphasis on Sarajevo. From 1991 to 1995, over 200,000 Bosnians were killed and over one million displaced and another million as refugees.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bosnia: Dayton Accords |url=https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/specials/bosnia/context/dayton.html |access-date=2023-06-20 |website=archive.nytimes.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=UNMIBH: United Nations Mission in Bosnia Herzegovina - Background |url=https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/mission/past/unmibh/background.html |access-date=2022-06-28 |website=peacekeeping.un.org |archive-date=14 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220814104603/https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/mission/past/unmibh/background.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


The OSCE continues to have a presence and a number of initiatives to bring a sustained peace to the region. The OSCE continues to have a presence and a number of initiatives to bring a sustained peace to the region.


=== Economic and environmental dimension (second dimension) === === Economic and environmental dimension (second dimension) ===
{{Unreferenced section|date=February 2012}}


Activities in the economic and environmental dimension include the monitoring of developments related to economic and environmental security in OSCE participating States, with the aim of alerting them to any threat of conflict; assisting States in the creation of economic and environmental policies, legislation and institutions to promote security in the OSCE region. Activities in the economic and environmental dimension include the monitoring of developments related to economic and environmental security in OSCE participating States, with the aim of alerting them to any threat of conflict; assisting States in the creation of economic and environmental policies, legislation and institutions to promote security in the OSCE region.<ref name="adm223">{{cite web |title=Objectives and institutions of the OSCE |url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/foreign-policy/international-organizations/osce/ausrichtung-und-institutionen-der-osze.html |date=22 March 2023}}</ref>


; Economic activities ; Economic activities
Line 631: Line 940:


=== Human dimension (third dimension) === === Human dimension (third dimension) ===
The commitments made by OSCE participating States in the ] aim to ensure full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; to abide by the ]; to promote the principles of democracy by building, strengthening and protecting democratic institutions; and to promote ] throughout the OSCE region. The commitments made by OSCE participating States in the ] aim to ensure full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; to abide by the ]; to promote the principles of democracy by building, strengthening and protecting democratic institutions; and to promote ] throughout the OSCE region.<ref name="adm223"/>


;Combating trafficking in human beings ; Combating trafficking in human beings
Since 2003, the OSCE<ref name="osce.org">{{cite web|url=https://www.osce.org/cthb|title=Combating trafficking in human beings|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140315004217/http://www.osce.org/cthb|archive-date=15 March 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> has had an established mechanism for combating trafficking in human beings, as defined by Article 3 of the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://untreaty.un.org/English/TreatyEvent2003/Texts/treaty2E.pdf|title=Palermo Protocol|website=Untreaty.un.org|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060928150400/http://untreaty.un.org/English/TreatyEvent2003/Texts/treaty2E.pdf|archive-date=28 September 2006}}</ref> which is aimed at raising public awareness of the problem and building the political will within participating states to tackle it effectively. Since 2003, the OSCE<ref name="osce.org">{{cite web |url=https://www.osce.org/cthb|title=Combating trafficking in human beings |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140315004217/http://www.osce.org/cthb |archive-date=15 March 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> has had an established mechanism for combating trafficking in human beings, as defined by Article 3 of the ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://untreaty.un.org/English/TreatyEvent2003/Texts/treaty2E.pdf |title=Palermo Protocol |website=Untreaty.un.org |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060928150400/http://untreaty.un.org/English/TreatyEvent2003/Texts/treaty2E.pdf |archive-date=28 September 2006}}</ref> which is aimed at raising public awareness of the problem and building the political will within participating states to tackle it effectively.


The OSCE actions against ] are coordinated by the Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings.<ref name="osce.org"/> ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/cthb/43180|title=Maria Grazia Giammarinaro|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111027231736/http://www.osce.org/cthb/43180|archive-date=27 October 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> a judge in the Criminal Court of Rome, took Office as the Special Representative in March 2010. From 2006 to 2009, this Office was held by ], a former Finnish Minister of Health and Social Services. Biaudet currently serves as Finnish Ombudsman for Minorities. Her predecessor was former Austrian Minister ], who served as the first OSCE Special Representative for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings. The OSCE actions against ] are coordinated by the Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings.<ref name="osce.org"/> ],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/cthb/43180 |title=Maria Grazia Giammarinaro |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111027231736/http://www.osce.org/cthb/43180 |archive-date=27 October 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> a judge in the Criminal Court of Rome, took Office as the Special Representative in March 2010. From 2006 to 2009, this Office was held by ], a former Finnish Minister of Health and Social Services. Biaudet currently serves as Finnish Ombudsman for Minorities. Her predecessor was former Austrian Minister ], who served as the first OSCE Special Representative for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings.


The activities around Combating Trafficking in Human Beings in the OSCE Region of the Office of the Special Representative include:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osce.org/publications/cthb/2007/10/27431_971_en.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091015181750/http://www.osce.org/publications/cthb/2007/10/27431_971_en.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=15 October 2009|title=Combating Trafficking in Human Beings in the OSCE Region|website=Osce.org|access-date=31 December 2017}}</ref> The activities around Combating Trafficking in Human Beings in the OSCE Region of the Office of the Special Representative include:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.osce.org/publications/cthb/2007/10/27431_971_en.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091015181750/http://www.osce.org/publications/cthb/2007/10/27431_971_en.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=15 October 2009 |title=Combating Trafficking in Human Beings in the OSCE Region |website=Osce.org |access-date=31 December 2017 }}</ref>
* Co-operation with governments, helping them to accept and act on their responsibilities for curbing trafficking in human beings; * Co-operation with governments, helping them to accept and act on their responsibilities for curbing trafficking in human beings;
* Providing governments with decision and policy-making aids and offering guidance on anti-trafficking management, with the aim of arriving at solutions tailored to the needs of the individual countries and in line with international standards; * Providing governments with decision and policy-making aids and offering guidance on anti-trafficking management, with the aim of arriving at solutions tailored to the needs of the individual countries and in line with international standards;
* Assisting governments to develop the national anti-trafficking structures required for efficient internal and transnational co-operation; * Assisting governments to develop the national anti-trafficking structures required for efficient internal and transnational co-operation;
* Raising awareness to draw attention to the complexity of the problem and to the need for comprehensive solutions; * Raising awareness to draw attention to the complexity of the problem and to the need for comprehensive solutions;
* Considering all dimensions of ], namely trafficking for ], trafficking for ], including domestic servitude, trafficking into ]s,trafficking in organs and trafficking in children; * Considering all dimensions of ], namely trafficking for ], trafficking for ], including domestic servitude, trafficking into ]s, trafficking in organs and trafficking in children;
* Ensuring the effective interaction of all agents and stake holders involved in the fight against human trafficking, ranging from governmental authorities, law enforcement officials to NGOs, and—last but not least—]s, as the agencies providing support thorough expertise and know-how; * Ensuring the effective interaction of all agents and stake holders involved in the fight against human trafficking, ranging from governmental authorities, law enforcement officials to NGOs, and—last but not least—]s, as the agencies providing support thorough expertise and know-how;
* Guaranteeing the highest possible visibility of the OSCE's fight against human trafficking to focus attention on the issue. * Guaranteeing the highest possible visibility of the OSCE's fight against human trafficking to focus attention on the issue.


;Democratization ; Democratization
The OSCE claims to promote democracy and assist the participating states in building ]. The OSCE claims to promote democracy and assist the participating states in building ].<ref>{{cite web |title=Conflict Resolution through Democracy Promotion? The Role of the OSCE in Georgia |url=https://gsdrc.org/document-library/conflict-resolution-through-democracy-promotion-the-role-of-the-osce-in-georgia/ |date=2008 |access-date=8 September 2023 |archive-date=8 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230908062557/https://gsdrc.org/document-library/conflict-resolution-through-democracy-promotion-the-role-of-the-osce-in-georgia/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>


;Education ; Education
Education programmes are an integral part of the organization's efforts in conflict prevention and post-conflict rehabilitation. Education programmes are an integral part of the organization's efforts in conflict prevention and post-conflict rehabilitation.


;Elections ; Elections
As part of its democratization activities, the OSCE carries out election assistance projects in the run-up to, during, and following elections. However, the effectiveness of such assistance is arguable—Kazakhstan, for example, despite being the former chair of the OSCE, is considered by many to be one of the least democratic countries in the world. Moreover, the recent democratic advances made in other Central Asian republics, notably Kyrgyzstan, have led to rumours of Soviet-style disruption of the Kyrgyz democratic process by, in particular, Kazakhstan and Russia. This may be in large part due to fears over the long-term stability of these countries' own quasi-dictatorships. As part of its democratization activities, the OSCE carries out election assistance projects in the run-up to, during, and following elections. However, the effectiveness of such assistance is arguable—Kazakhstan, for example, despite being the former chair of the OSCE, is considered by many to be one of the least democratic countries in the world. Moreover, the recent democratic advances made in other Central Asian republics, notably Kyrgyzstan, have led to rumours of Soviet-style disruption of the Kyrgyz democratic process by, in particular, Kazakhstan and Russia. This may be in large part due to fears over the long-term stability of these countries' own quasi-dictatorships.


;Gender equality ; Gender equality
The equality of men and women is an integral part of sustainable democracy. The OSCE aims to provide equal opportunities for men and women and to integrate ] in policies and practices. The equality of men and women is an integral part of sustainable democracy. The OSCE aims to provide equal opportunities for men and women and to integrate ] in policies and practices.


;Human rights ; Human rights
The OSCE's ] activities focus on such priorities as ] and religion, preventing torture and trafficking in persons. The OSCE's ] activities focus on such priorities as ] and religion, preventing torture and trafficking in persons.


;National and international NGOs ; National and international NGOs
OSCE could grant ] to ] and ] in the form of "Researcher-in-residence programme" (run by the Prague Office of the OSCE Secretariat): accredited representatives of national and international NGOs are granted access to all records and to numerous topical compilations related to OSCE field activities. OSCE could grant ] to ] and ] in the form of "Researcher-in-residence programme" (run by the Prague Office of the OSCE Secretariat): accredited representatives of national and international NGOs are granted access to all records and to numerous topical compilations related to OSCE field activities.


;Media freedom ; Media freedom
The OSCE observes relevant media developments in its participating states with a view to addressing and providing early warning on violations of ]. The OSCE observes relevant media developments in its participating states with a view to addressing and providing early warning on violations of ].


;Minority rights ; Minority rights
Ethnic conflict is one of the main sources of large-scale violence in Europe today. The OSCE's approach is to identify and to seek early resolution of ethnic tensions, and to set standards for the rights of persons belonging to ]s and ] has been established. Ethnic conflict is one of the main sources of large-scale violence in Europe today. The OSCE's approach is to identify and to seek early resolution of ethnic tensions, and to set standards for the rights of persons belonging to ]s and ] has been established.<ref>{{cite web |title=National minority standards of the OSCE and the High Commissioner on National Minorities |url=https://www.coe.int/en/web/minorities/osce-national-minority-standards |access-date=8 September 2023}}</ref>


== OSCE Democracy Defender Award == == OSCE Democracy Defender Award ==
The Democracy Defender Award honors a person or group for contributions to the promotion of democracy and the defense of human rights "in the spirit of Helsinki Final Act and other OSCE principles and commitments." The award was established in 2016 on the initiative of Ambassadors of 8 countries, and supported by the delegations of the 18 countries of the OSCE (22 countries in 2017).<ref name="demdefend">{{cite web|url=http://www.swedenabroad.com/en-GB/Embassies/OSCE/Current-affairs/News/Democracy-Defender-Award-presented-at-Schwedenhaus-sys/|title=Democracy Defender Award presented at Schwedenhaus|publisher=OSCE mission in Sweden}}{{Dead link|date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref name="epde">{{cite web|url=http://www.epde.org/en/newsreader/items/russian-epde-member-golos-awarded-2017-democracy-defender-award-in-vienna.html|title=Russian EPDE member "Golos" awarded 2017 Democracy Defender Award in Vienna|publisher=European Platform for Democratic Elections}}{{Dead link|date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The Democracy Defender Award honors a person or group for contributions to the promotion of democracy and the defense of human rights "in the spirit of Helsinki Final Act and other OSCE principles and commitments." The award was established in 2016 on the initiative of Ambassadors of 8&nbsp;countries, and supported by the delegations of the 18&nbsp;countries of the OSCE (22&nbsp;countries in 2017).<ref name="demdefend">{{cite web |url=http://www.swedenabroad.com/en-GB/Embassies/OSCE/Current-affairs/News/Democracy-Defender-Award-presented-at-Schwedenhaus-sys/ |title=Democracy Defender Award presented at Schwedenhaus |publisher=OSCE mission in Sweden}}{{Dead link |date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref><ref name="epde">{{cite web |url=http://www.epde.org/en/newsreader/items/russian-epde-member-golos-awarded-2017-democracy-defender-award-in-vienna.html|title=Russian EPDE member "Golos" awarded 2017 Democracy Defender Award in Vienna |publisher=European Platform for Democratic Elections}}{{Dead link |date=July 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref>


{|class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders" style="text-align:center" {|class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders" style="text-align:center"
|- |-
! scope="col" width=50 style="background:#87CEFA;"|Year ! scope="col" style="background:#87CEFA;" |Year
! scope="col" width=150 style="background:#87CEFA;"|Recipient ! scope="col" style="background:#87CEFA;" |Recipient
! scope="col" width=150 style="background:#87CEFA;"| Nationality ! scope="col" style="background:#87CEFA;" |Nationality
! scope="col" class=unsortable width=250 style="background:#87CEFA;"| Notes ! scope="col" class=unsortable style="background:#87CEFA;" |Notes
! scope="col" class=unsortable width=80 style="background:#87CEFA;"|Reference ! scope="col" class=unsortable style="background:#87CEFA;" |Reference
|- |-
|2022 || ZMINA <br> ]
|2020
| {{Flag|Ukraine}} <br> {{Flag|Russia}} || Ukrainian Human Rights Centre Zmina and to the Russian Memorial Human Rights Centre in recognition of their courageous and important efforts to promote human rights and democracy. ||<ref>{{cite web |title=Denmark and OSCE-partner countries honours Human Rights Centre ZMINA and Memorial Human Rights Centre with 2022 Democracy Defender Award |url=https://oestrig.um.dk/nyheder/denmark-and-osce-partner-countries-honours-zmina-and-memorial-with-2022-democracy-defender-award |access-date=7 September 2023}}</ref>
|]
|{{Flag|Belarus}}
|Belarusian organisation established in 1996 which advocates for the rights of political prisoners in Belarus and against the government of ].
|<ref>{{Cite web|date=March 12, 2020|title=On the 2020 Democracy Defender Award|url=https://osce.usmission.gov/on-the-2020-democracy-defender-award-winner/|access-date=February 24, 2021|website=U.S. Mission to the OSCE}}</ref>
|- |-
|2020 ||]
|2019
|{{Flag|Belarus}} ||Belarusian organisation established in 1996 which advocates for the rights of political prisoners in Belarus and against the government of ].
|
|<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 12, 2020 |title=On the 2020 Democracy Defender Award |url=https://osce.usmission.gov/on-the-2020-democracy-defender-award-winner/ |access-date=February 24, 2021 |website=U.S. Mission to the OSCE |archive-date=1 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210501163243/https://osce.usmission.gov/on-the-2020-democracy-defender-award-winner/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|{{flag|Armenia}}
|Armenian organisation which intends to raise public awareness on important issues and reduce the impact of misinformation on decision-making.
|<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://osce.usmission.gov/2019-democracy-defender-award-seminar-and-presentation/|title=2019 Democracy Defender Award Seminar and Presentation|date=2019-03-13|website=U.S. Mission to the OSCE|language=en-US|access-date=2019-03-25}}</ref>
|- |-
|2019 ||] (UIC)
|2018
|{{flag|Armenia}} ||Armenian organisation which intends to raise public awareness on important issues and reduce the impact of misinformation on decision-making.
|
|<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://osce.usmission.gov/2019-democracy-defender-award-seminar-and-presentation/ |title=2019 Democracy Defender Award Seminar and Presentation |date=2019-03-13 |website=U.S. Mission to the OSCE |language=en-US |access-date=2019-03-25 |archive-date=28 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728033903/https://osce.usmission.gov/2019-democracy-defender-award-seminar-and-presentation/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|{{flag|Serbia}}
|Serbian organisation established in 2002 to improve the democratic culture, the rule of law and the freedom of the Media
|<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://osce.usmission.gov/serbias-crta-receives-2018-democracy-defender-award/|title=Serbia's 'CRTA' Receives the 2018 Democracy Defender Award {{!}} USOSCE|date=2018-03-19|website=U.S. Mission to the OSCE|language=en-US|access-date=2019-03-25}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.swedenabroad.se/en/embassies/serbia-belgrade/current/news/democracy-defender-award-till-engagemang-för-demokratisk-utveckling-i-serbien/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805225333/https://www.swedenabroad.se/en/embassies/serbia-belgrade/current/news/democracy-defender-award-till-engagemang-f%C3%B6r-demokratisk-utveckling-i-serbien/|url-status=dead|archive-date=5 August 2020|title=Democracy Defender Award" till engagemang för demokratisk utveckling i Serbien|website=Sweden Abroad|language=en|access-date=2019-03-25}}</ref>
|- |-
|2018 ||
| 2017
|{{flag|Serbia}} ||Serbian organisation established in 2002 to improve the democratic culture, the rule of law and the freedom of the Media
| ]
|<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://osce.usmission.gov/serbias-crta-receives-2018-democracy-defender-award/ |title=Serbia's 'CRTA' Receives the 2018 Democracy Defender Award {{!}} USOSCE |date=2018-03-19 |website=U.S. Mission to the OSCE |language=en-US |access-date=2019-03-25 |archive-date=28 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728033856/https://osce.usmission.gov/serbias-crta-receives-2018-democracy-defender-award/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.swedenabroad.se/en/embassies/serbia-belgrade/current/news/democracy-defender-award-till-engagemang-för-demokratisk-utveckling-i-serbien/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805225333/https://www.swedenabroad.se/en/embassies/serbia-belgrade/current/news/democracy-defender-award-till-engagemang-f%C3%B6r-demokratisk-utveckling-i-serbien/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=5 August 2020 |title=Democracy Defender Award" till engagemang för demokratisk utveckling i Serbien |website=Sweden Abroad |language=en |access-date=2019-03-25}}</ref>
| {{flag|Russia}}
| Russian organisation established in 2000 to protect the electoral rights of citizens and to foster civil society
|<ref name=demdefend/>
|- |-
| 2017 || ]
| 2016
| {{flag|Russia}} || Russian organisation established in 2000 to protect the electoral rights of citizens and to foster civil society
| ]
|<ref name=demdefend/>
| {{flag|Ukraine}}
| Ukrainian activist, coordinator of Euromaidan SOS and leader of Civil Rights Center
|<ref name="pravda.ua">{{cite web|url=http://oestrig.um.dk/da/om-os/nyheder/newsdisplaypage.aspx?newsid=8bfd912e-1d71-4fc2-9c10-e5fa9adfea03|title=Democracy Defenders Award|publisher=OSCE mission in Denmark|access-date=29 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180926114450/http://oestrig.um.dk/da/om-os/nyheder/newsdisplaypage.aspx?newsid=8bfd912e-1d71-4fc2-9c10-e5fa9adfea03|archive-date=26 September 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
|- |-
| 2016 || ]
| {{flag|Ukraine}} || Ukrainian activist, coordinator of Euromaidan SOS and leader of Civil Rights Center
|<ref name="pravda.ua">{{cite web |url=http://oestrig.um.dk/da/om-os/nyheder/newsdisplaypage.aspx?newsid=8bfd912e-1d71-4fc2-9c10-e5fa9adfea03 |title=Democracy Defenders Award |publisher=OSCE mission in Denmark |access-date=29 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180926114450/http://oestrig.um.dk/da/om-os/nyheder/newsdisplaypage.aspx?newsid=8bfd912e-1d71-4fc2-9c10-e5fa9adfea03 |archive-date=26 September 2018 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
|} |}

== Criticism ==
Following an unprecedented period of activity in the 1990s and in the first decade of the 21st century, the OSCE faced accusations from the ] states (primarily{{Citation needed|reason= Why primarily?|date= December 2016}} ]) of being a tool for the Western states to advance their own interests. For instance, the events in ] in 2004 (the "]") led to allegations by Russia of OSCE involvement on behalf of the pro-Western ] (President of Ukraine from 2005 to 2010). At the 2007 ], ] stated:<blockquote>They are trying to transform the OSCE into a vulgar instrument designed to promote the foreign policy interests of one or a group of countries. And this task is also being accomplished by the OSCE's bureaucratic apparatus, which is absolutely not connected with the state founders in any way. Decision-making procedures and the involvement of so-called non-governmental organizations are tailored for this task. These organizations are formally independent but they are purposefully financed and therefore under control.<ref> {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070221222921/http://www.kommersant.com/p741749/r_527/Munich_Speech_Vladimir_Putin/ |date= 21 February 2007 }}, ''Kommersant Moscow''</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.rferl.org/a/1058603.html|title= OSCE: Election Experts Debate Russian Criticism|publisher= Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty|access-date=24 April 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170424181306/http://www.rferl.org/a/1058603.html|archive-date= 24 April 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.brama.com/news/press/2004/07/040729csce.html|title= Criticism of OSCE by Nine CIS Countries Draws the Response|website=Brama.com|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170907000510/http://www.brama.com/news/press/2004/07/040729csce.html |archive-date=7 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.aspr.ac.at/osce_report06.pdf|title= Austrian Study Centre for Peace and Conflict Resolution (ASPR) - Peace Castle Austria|website=Aspr.ac.at|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070927225839/http://www.aspr.ac.at/osce_report06.pdf|archive-date=27 September 2007|url-status= live}}</ref></blockquote>Russia and its allies are advancing the concept of a comprehensive OSCE reform, which would make the Secretariat, institutions and field presences more centralized and accountable to collective consensus-based bodies and focus the work of the Organization on topical security issues (human trafficking, terrorism, non-proliferation, arms control, etc.), at the expense of the "Human Dimension", or human rights issues. The move to reduce the autonomy of the theoretically independent OSCE institutions, such as ODIHR, would effectively grant a Russian veto over any OSCE activity. Western participating States are opposing this process, which they see as an attempt to prevent the OSCE from carrying out its democratization agenda in post-Soviet countries.{{citation needed|date=October 2014}}

Following the ], the Russian parliamentarian ] accused the OSCE's ODIHR of having double standards. The point was made that while numerous violations of the voting process were registered, its criticism came only from within the United States (media, human rights organizations, McCain's election staff), while the OSCE - known for its bashing criticism of elections on the post-Soviet space - remained silent.<ref>" {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110511125521/http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?id=-13534 |date=11 May 2011 }}", ], 6 November 2008</ref><ref>" {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090225014407/http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2005/03/13658_en.pdf |date=25 February 2009 }}" of the U.S. 2008 presidential election</ref>

=== OSCE Parliamentary Assembly ===
{{main|Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe}}
In 2004, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly sent ]s to the U.S. presidential elections. The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly's president at the time was Democratic Congressman ]. Hastings had previously been impeached for corruption by the U.S. Congress. The OSCE faced criticism of partisanship and double standards due to Hastings's past and the fact that the OSCE's mandate was to promote democracy and the values of civil society.<ref>{{cite news|title= US vote 'mostly free and fair'|url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/americas/2004/vote_usa_2004/3987655.stm|access-date= 23 December 2013|newspaper=BBC|date=5 November 2004|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131213215747/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/americas/2004/vote_usa_2004/3987655.stm|archive-date= 13 December 2013|url-status=live}}</ref>

In 2010, the ] was criticized from within by the Latvian delegation for lacking transparency and democracy. ] (b. 1938) secretary general of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, who held the post from the organization's inception in 1992 until 2015, faced a challenge from the Latvian ]. According to the rules of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the incumbent general secretary can only be replaced with a full consensus minus one. Pabriks called the rules "quite shocking from the perspective of an organization that's monitoring elections".<ref> {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131217210855/http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0710/An_election_in_Copenhagen.html |date=17 December 2013 }} politico.com</ref>

=== 2012 Texas controversy ===
Before the U.S. presidential elections of November 2012, the OSCE announced its intention to send electoral observers to Texas and to other ]s. This prompted the Attorney General of Texas ] to send letters to U.S. ] ] and to the OSCE,<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/releases/2012/102312abbot_letter.pdf |title= Attorney General of Texas |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130114215959/https://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/releases/2012/102312abbot_letter.pdf |archive-date= 14 January 2013 |website= oag.state.tx.us |url-status= dead |access-date= 18 January 2013 }}</ref> threatening to arrest OSCE officials if they should enter electoral premises in Texas and break ].<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=4199 |date= 25 October 2012 |title= Attorney General Abbott Informs U.S. State Department that International Election Observers Cannot Circumvent Texas Law |publisher=Texas Attorney General|website=Oag.state.tx.us|access-date=31 December 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131024053635/https://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=4199|archive-date= 24 October 2013 |url-status= live}}</ref> In reply, the ] stated that OSCE observers enjoyed immunities.<ref> US State Department</ref> In the event, no incidents between OSCE and Texas authorities were recorded during the elections.

=== War in Donbas ===
]
On 21 March 2014, the OSCE deployed its ] at the request of Ukraine's government.<ref>. OSCE.</ref> The mission has received mixed reviews. While some observers have applauded its function as the "eyes and ears of the international community",<ref>{{cite journal |last1= Stephanie |first1= Liechtenstein |title= The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission has become the Eyes and Ears of the International Community on the Ground in Ukraine |journal= Security and Human Rights |date= 1 March 2014 |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=5–10 |doi=10.1163/18750230-02501008 }}</ref> others have accused the mission of bias towards either Russia or Ukraine.

On 27 April 2014, the ] group that had taken control in the city of ] (Slavyansk) took eight members of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (OSCE SMM) as hostages.<ref>Luke Harding. . '']'', 27 April 2014</ref> The group appointed ] as mayor of the city.

During the ], an OSCE observer allowed Russian separatists to travel in a vehicle with the organization's markings; this prompted allegations that the OSCE was biased in the war and not interested in carrying out its duties of mediating a ceasefire. The organization issued a statement regretting the incident.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://ru.tsn.ua/politika/nablyudateli-obse-vozili-v-svoem-avtomobile-vooruzhennyh-boevikov-389982.html|publisher=TSN|title=Наблюдатели ОБСЕ возили в своем автомобиле вооруженных боевиков|language= ru|date= 3 October 2014|access-date= 4 October 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141005233633/http://ru.tsn.ua/politika/nablyudateli-obse-vozili-v-svoem-avtomobile-vooruzhennyh-boevikov-389982.html|archive-date= 5 October 2014|url-status= live}}</ref>

Moreover, the OSCE Observer Mission at Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk (which is organizationally separate from the Special Monitoring Mission) also received criticism alleging that only two checkpoints on the Russian–Ukrainian border are currently being monitored, which Daniel Baer, the US ambassador to the OSCE at the time, described as "seriously inadequate".{{Citation needed|reason=No source for the quote by Daniel Baer is provided|date=January 2021}}

On the other hand, Ukraine has faced criticism following a BBC report showing an alleged violation of the ] when ] in a residential neighbourhood of ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://twitter.com/TomBurridgebbc/status/826812407225909249 | title=We met Ukrainian troops and tanks in #Avdiivka ... | date=1 February 2017 | author=Tom Burridge | publisher=Twitter | access-date=6 August 2018 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180409062136/https://twitter.com/TomBurridgebbc/status/826812407225909249 | archive-date=9 April 2018 | url-status=live }}</ref> The mission has also been criticized for taking months to deploy drones to help monitor borders as well as withdrawing them after only several weeks of use due to Russian electronic attacks. Drones have been reintroduced to observe the conflict in 2018.<ref>{{cite news |title= OSCE relaunches long-range surveillance drone program in Ukraine |url= https://www.unian.info/war/10058525-osce-relaunches-long-range-surveillance-drone-program-in-ukraine.html |publisher= UNIAN |date=27 March 2018}}</ref>

In 2014, an advisor to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence wrongly claimed that approximately 80% of the OSCE observers located near ] were Russian citizens and that many had ties to Russian security agencies such as the ] and the ]. In reality, one observer out of 17 in Mariupol was a Russian citizen.<ref>{{cite news |title=OSCE denies it gave information about Ukrainian troop positions to Russians |url= https://www.unian.info/society/1008007-osce-denies-it-gave-information-about-ukrainian-troop-positions-to-russians.html |access-date=24 January 2021 |publisher=UNIAN |date=11 November 2014}}</ref> In total, the mission reports the number of Russian citizens in its ranks as 39 out of 720, or 5,4%.<ref>{{cite web |title=Status Report 14 December 2020 |url= https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/e/3/474042.pdf |website=OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine |publisher= OSCE |access-date= 4 January 2021}}</ref> The organization has also been accused of allegedly revealing the locations of Ukrainian troops to Russian forces during the conflict.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://osce.einnews.com/article__detail/233848306?lcode=xlBANnWjcZIh_XzBy9uIdg%3D%3D |publisher= OSCE news|title= The OSCE monitoring mission has stopped using drones to monitor the situation in the rebel-held territories}}{{Dead link|date=September 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted= yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://euroua.com/europe/osce/3258-missiya-obse-v-ukraine-pod-shkvalom-kritiki|publisher=EuroUA|title= Миссия ОБСЕ в Украине под шквалом критики |access-date= 11 November 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141015223106/http://euroua.com/europe/osce/3258-missiya-obse-v-ukraine-pod-shkvalom-kritiki|archive-date=15 October 2014|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://gazeta.ua/ru/articles/politics/_litvin-rasskazal-genseku-obse-chto-kritika-v-adres-ukrainy-ne-vsegda-ob-ektivna/400033|publisher= Gazeta|title= Литвин рассказал генсеку ОБСЕ, что критика в адрес Украины не всегда объективна|date= 16 September 2011|access-date= 11 November 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141111060936/http://gazeta.ua/ru/articles/politics/_litvin-rasskazal-genseku-obse-chto-kritika-v-adres-ukrainy-ne-vsegda-ob-ektivna/400033|archive-date=11 November 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.liga.net/news/politics/4011607-rossiya_uznala_ot_obse_mesta_dislokatsii_ryada_podrazdeleniy_sil_ato.htm|publisher= Liga|title= Россия узнала от ОБСЕ места дислокации ряда подразделений сил АТО|date=11 November 2014|access-date= 11 November 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141111060121/http://news.liga.net/news/politics/4011607-rossiya_uznala_ot_obse_mesta_dislokatsii_ryada_podrazdeleniy_sil_ato.htm|archive-date=11 November 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.ukrinform.ua/rus/news/minoboroni_80_sotrudnikov_obse_v_mariupole__rossiyane_sredi_nih_fsbshniki_1682979|publisher=Ukrinform|title=Минобороны: 80% сотрудников ОБСЕ в Мариуполе – россияне, среди них ФСБшники|access-date=11 November 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150603002550/http://www.ukrinform.ua/rus/news/minoboroni_80_sotrudnikov_obse_v_mariupole__rossiyane_sredi_nih_fsbshniki_1682979|archive-date=3 June 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>

On 1 December 2014, Ukrainian media reported that an OSCE observer was injured by Ukrainian counter-artillery fire while observing militants firing at Ukrainian forces. The OSCE team was accused of being located next to two pro-Russian mortar-teams. The report stated that the OSCE team did not radio in or record the Russian mortar-team firing on Ukrainian positions. The report criticised that this constituted unorthodox behaviour and that the incident showed that the OSCE team was not acting in an impartial manner.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://burkonews.info/osce-observer-wounded-counter-fire-observing-separatist-militia-firing-mortar-ukrainian-forces/|archive-url= https://archive.today/20141213050204/https://burkonews.info/osce-observer-wounded-counter-fire-observing-separatist-militia-firing-mortar-ukrainian-forces/|url-status= dead|archive-date= 2014-12-13|publisher=BurkoNews|title=OSCE observer is wounded from counter-fire while observing separatist militia firing a mortar at Ukrainian forces.}}</ref>

In contrast, the report provided by the OSCE on that day states that the mission was in the area to "facilitate a local ceasefire and monitor the repair works on a power station", that it "heard an exchange of artillery fire between unspecified parties", and that "artillery rounds were impacting at approximately 1km to the east of the SMM's position; therefore the SMM left due to security concerns". Furthermore, the report states that the "SMM team in the ] was in constant contact with the SMM team in Staromikhailivka". No mention of a wounded observer is made.<ref>{{cite web |title= Latest from OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) based on information received as of 18:00 (Kyiv time) 1 December 2014 |url=https://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/128901 |website=OSCE.org |publisher=OSCE |access-date=28 January 2021}}</ref>

On 27 October 2015, a suspended OSCE monitor confirmed he had been a former employee of Russia's ]. The suspended SMM stated that he had no trouble receiving the position and neither the OSCE nor Ukraine's Security Service thoroughly checked his background.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unian.info/politics/1166116-suspended-osce-monitor-confirms-hes-russian-gru-officer.html|publisher=UNIAN|title=Suspended OSCE monitor confirms he's Russian GRU officer |access-date=28 October 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151028133935/http://www.unian.info/politics/1166116-suspended-osce-monitor-confirms-hes-russian-gru-officer.html|archive-date= 28 October 2015|url-status= live}}</ref> Following the report the OSCE issued a comment stating the monitor had been fired due to violations of the organization's code of conduct.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/10/osce-ukraine-lies/|publisher= Value Walk|title= That Time A Russian OSCE Monitor in Ukraine Got Drunk, Said Too Much|date=30 October 2015}}</ref>

On 6 April 2016, photos of OSCE monitors attending the wedding of a Russian separatist emerged. The wedding had taken place in June 2015. The OSCE expressed regret over the incident, issuing a statement saying "The unprofessional behaviour displayed by the monitors in the picture is an individual incident that should not be abused to cast a shadow on the reputation of other mission members." The OSCE reported that the monitors were no longer with the OSCE special monitoring mission.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-osce-staff-at-separatist-wedding/27660759.html|publisher=Radio Free Europe|title= OSCE Expresses 'Regret' After Staff Shown at Separatist Wedding in Ukraine|access-date= 7 April 2016|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160408065108/http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-osce-staff-at-separatist-wedding/27660759.html|archive-date=8 April 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>

In April 2017, an OSCE vehicle struck a mine, which killed one SMM member and injured two.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-osce-idUSKBN17P0CZ|title=American member of watchdog OSCE killed in Ukraine|date= 24 April 2017|work= ]|access-date= 2 July 2017 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170704183146/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-osce-idUSKBN17P0CZ|archive-date= 4 July 2017|url-status= live}}</ref> Two armoured vehicles were on patrol near ] when one struck the mine.<ref name="NYT01">{{Cite news |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/23/world/europe/american-killed-ukraine.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-1&action=click&contentCollection=Europe&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article |title= Land Mine Kills American on Monitoring Mission in Ukraine |date= 23 April 2017 |work=The New York Times |access-date=24 April 2017 |agency=Reuters |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171231052020/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/23/world/europe/american-killed-ukraine.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-1&action=click&contentCollection=Europe&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article |archive-date= 31 December 2017 |url-status= live }}</ref> The dead man was an American paramedic, while the injured included a woman from ] and a man from the ].<ref name=NYT01/>

On 18 July 2018, the German broadcaster ] reported that Russian intelligence services had received inside information about the activities of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine from a staff member of the OSCE. The insider information consisted of observers' preferences in alcohol and women, their financial situation, and their contacts in Ukraine. The OSCE issued a statement expressing concern over the alleged security breach.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.france24.com/en/20180718-osce-ukraine-mission-says-claim-russian-spying-big-blow |title=OSCE Ukraine mission says claim of Russian spying 'big blow'|date= 18 July 2018|publisher=France24|access-date= 18 July 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180718193243/http://www.france24.com/en/20180718-osce-ukraine-mission-says-claim-russian-spying-big-blow|archive-date=18 July 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>

Russia has accused members of the Mission of working for the Ukrainian ] and of spying on the pro-Russian separatists.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Miller |first1= Christopher |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-fsb-arrests-osce-ukraine-spying/27865916.html |title= Russia Detains OSCE Monitor, Accuses Him Of Spying For Ukraine|access-date=4 January 2021 |publisher= Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty |date=18 July 2016}}</ref> Furthermore, Russia has accused the mission of bias after it reported troop movements from separatist forces, accusing the mission of ignoring similar moves from Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ukraine crisis: Russia accuses OSCE monitors of bias |url= https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30056604 |agency= BBC |date= 14 November 2014}}</ref> Russia's foreign minister also has claimed that the mission failed to pay sufficient attention to human- and minority-rights within the Government-controlled areas of Ukraine. Furthermore, he criticised that the mission did not clearly attribute ceasefire violations to either side.<ref>{{cite news |title= Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov unhappy with OSCE SMM's performance in Ukraine |url= https://www.unian.info/world/osce-russia-s-foreign-minister-lavrov-unhappy-with-osce-monitors-in-ukraine-11109665.html |access-date= 8 January 2021 |publisher= UNIAN |date= 12 August 2020}}</ref>

=== Turkey ===
In April 2017, Turkish President ] criticized the OSCE for reporting that opposition "No" campaigners in the ] had faced bans, police interventions and arrests. Erdoğan said: "Now the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe says if the result is 'yes', that means there are a lot of problems. Who are you? First of all, you should know your place. This is not your duty."<ref> {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180508054305/http://www.euronews.com/2017/04/14/erdogan-slams-osce-ahead-of-constitutional-referendum |date=8 May 2018 }}. ]. 14 April 2017.</ref><ref>" {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180508054844/http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/president-erdogan-slams-osce-over-referendum-campaign-report--112053 |date=8 May 2018 }}". '']''. 14 April 2017.
</ref><ref>
{{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180508055229/http://www.dw.com/en/osce-turkey-referendum-contested-on-an-unlevel-playing-field/a-38453816 |date= 8 May 2018 }}. '']'', 17 April 2017.
</ref>

=== Reaction to protests in Kazakhstan ===
Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova criticised the OSCE for being indifferent to ]. At the same time, she also noted how closely the OSCE follows events in some other countries.<ref> TASS. 13 January 2022. </ref> She said the OSCE was not helping journalists who have been attacked in Kazakhstan when she mentioned the attack on the office of the Kazakh branch of the ] in Almaty, which involved some 500 perpetrators. <ref> TASS. 8 January 2022.</ref> ], in an interview, condemned the way the West, including the OSCE, had reacted to the events in Kazakhstan as terrible and shameful. <ref> TASS. 13 January 2022. </ref>


== See also == == See also ==
{{div col|content= {{div col|content=
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 782: Line 1,033:
* ] * ]
}} }}

==Notes==
{{Reflist|group=Note}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}

==Further reading==
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite book |year=2023 |editor-last1=Baldi |editor-first1=Stefano |editor-link1=Stefano Baldi |title=Inside the OSCE. Papers from the Seminars for Italian Universities on the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe |url=https://diplosor.files.wordpress.com/2023/08/baldi_inside_osce-1.pdf| publisher=Editoriale Scientifica|location=Napoli| isbn=979-12-5976-712-7}}
{{refend}}


==External links== ==External links==
Line 791: Line 1,050:
* The U.S. Mission to the OSCE * The U.S. Mission to the OSCE
* The OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina * The OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
* Policing OnLine Information System * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211225100710/https://polis.osce.org/ |date=25 December 2021 }} Policing OnLine Information System
* {{Curlie|Society/Government/Multilateral/Regional/Organization_for_Security_and_Cooperation_in_Europe|OSCE}}
* required for U.S. citizens hired by the Organization. Provides a detailed outline of the OSCE, with additional modules on each major area that it is involved in. Website freely available, but tests only given to those who have submitted applications. * required for U.S. citizens hired by the Organization. Provides a detailed outline of the OSCE, with additional modules on each major area that it is involved in. Website freely available, but tests only given to those who have submitted applications.
* on ] * on ]
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100412095525/http://www.aspr.ac.at/conflict_management/osce_academy/summer_academy_on_osce.htm |date=12 April 2010 }} * {{Webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100412095525/http://www.aspr.ac.at/conflict_management/osce_academy/summer_academy_on_osce.htm |date=12 April 2010}}
* {{Internet Archive short film|id=gov.archives.arc.653077|name=Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975)}} * {{Internet Archive short film |id=gov.archives.arc.653077 |name=Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (1975)}}
* *


Line 802: Line 1,060:
{{Europe topics (small)}} {{Europe topics (small)}}
{{Election Organizations}} {{Election Organizations}}
{{regional organizations}}
{{Commonwealth of Independent States}} {{Commonwealth of Independent States}}
{{Eastern Bloc}} {{Eastern Bloc}}
Line 809: Line 1,068:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Organization For Security And Co-Operation In Europe}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Organization For Security And Co-Operation In Europe}}
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
Line 816: Line 1,074:
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 14:20, 6 December 2024

Security-oriented intergovernmental organization "OSCE" redirects here. For the examination model, see Objective structured clinical examination. Not to be confused with OECD.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
Flag of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Flag Logo of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Logo
Location of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
SecretariatVienna, Austria
Official languagesEnglish, French, German, Italian, Russian, Spanish
TypeIntergovernmental organization
with no legal personality
Membership57 participating countries
11 partners for co-operation
Leaders
• Chairman-in-Office Ian Borg
• Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Maria Telalian
• Representative on Freedom of the Media Jan Braathu
• High Commissioner on National Minorities Christophe Kamp
• Secretary-General Feridun Sinirlioğlu
Establishment
• As the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe July 1973
• Helsinki Accords 30 July – 1 August 1975
• Paris Charter 21 November 1990
• Renamed OSCE 1 January 1995
Area
• Total50,119,801 km (19,351,363 sq mi)
Population
• 2023 estimate1,300,028,916 (3rd)
• Density25/km (64.7/sq mi)
GDP (nominal)2023 estimate
• TotalUS$56.813 trillion
• Per capitaUS$43,701
Website
osce.org

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) is a regional security-oriented intergovernmental organization comprising member states in Europe, North America, and Asia. Its mandate includes issues such as arms control, the promotion of human rights, freedom of the press, and free and fair elections. It employs around 3,460 people, mostly in its field operations but also in its secretariat in Vienna, Austria, and its institutions. It has observer status at the United Nations.

The OSCE had its origins in 1975: its predecessors came together during the era of the Cold War to form a forum for discussion between the Western Bloc and the Eastern Bloc. Most of its 57 participating countries are in Europe, but with some members in Asia or in North America. The participating countries comprise much of the land area of the Northern Hemisphere.

The OSCE is concerned with early warning, conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation.

History

Roots

Helmut Schmidt, Erich Honecker, Gerald Ford and Bruno Kreisky at the 1975 CSCE summit in Helsinki, Finland

The Organization has its roots in the 1975 Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE). Talks had been mooted about a European security grouping since the 1950s but the Cold War prevented any substantial progress until the talks at Dipoli in Espoo began in November 1972. These talks were held at the suggestion of the Soviet Union which wished to use the talks to maintain its control over the communist states in Eastern Europe, and President of Finland Urho Kekkonen hosted them in order to bolster his policy of neutrality. Western Europe, however, saw these talks as a way to reduce the tension in the region, furthering economic cooperation and obtaining humanitarian improvements for the populations of the communist bloc.

The recommendations of the talks, in the form of "The Blue Book", gave the practical foundations for a three-stage conference called the "Helsinki process". The CSCE opened in Helsinki on 3 July 1973 with 35 states sending representatives. Stage I took only five days to agree to follow the Blue Book. Stage II was the main working phase and was conducted in Geneva from 18 September 1973 until 21 July 1975.

The result of Stage II was the Helsinki Final Act. This was signed by the 35 participating states during Stage III, which took place in Finlandia Hall between 30 July – 1 August 1975. It was opened by the Holy See's diplomat Cardinal Agostino Casaroli, who was the chairman of the conference.

The concepts of improving relations and implementing the act were developed over a series of follow-up meetings, with major gatherings in Belgrade (4 October 1977 – 8 March 1978), Madrid (11 November 1980 – 9 September 1983) and Vienna (4 November 1986 – 19 January 1989).

The Copenhagen commitment was written "to ensure that individuals are permitted to exercise their rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of association, including the right to form, join and participate effectively in non-governmental organizations, which seek the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms."

The Moscow Mechanism was agreed in 1991.

CSCE becomes OSCE

The fall of the Soviet Union required a change of role for the CSCE. The Charter of Paris for a New Europe, signed on 21 November 1990, marked the beginning of this change. The process was capped by the renaming of the CSCE as the OSCE on 1 January 1995, in accordance with the results of a conference held in Budapest in 1994. The OSCE now had a formal secretariat, a Senior Council, a Parliamentary Assembly, a Conflict Prevention Centre, and an Office for Free Elections, which later became the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

In December 1996, the "Lisbon Declaration on a Common and Comprehensive Security Model for Europe for the Twenty-First Century" affirmed the universal and indivisible nature of security on the European continent.

In Istanbul on 19 November 1999, the OSCE ended a two-day summit by calling for a political settlement in Chechnya and adopting a Charter for European Security.

Through its Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), the OSCE observes and assesses elections in its member states, in order to support fair and transparent democratic processes, in keeping with the mutual standards to which the organization is committed; between 1994 and 2004 the OSCE sent teams of observers to monitor more than 150 elections, typically focusing on elections in emerging democracies. In 2004, at the invitation of the United States Government, the ODIHR deployed an assessment mission, made up of participants from six OSCE member states, which observed that year's US presidential election and produced a report. It was the first time that a US presidential election was the subject of OSCE monitoring, although the organization had previously monitored state-level American elections in Florida and California, in 2002 and 2003.

Criticism of OSCE

Members of OSCE have criticised the organisation for being in a position where Russia, and sometimes Belarus, can veto all OSCE decisions, Moscow has, for a number of years, not allowed the approval of the organisation's budget, the organisation of official OSCE events or the extension of missions. In November 2023 they vetoed the appointment of Estonia as chairman from 2024.

OSCE missions and operations

1992 Georgia Mission

The OSCE Mission to Georgia was established in November 1992 with its headquarters in the capital Tbilisi. The Mission's mandate expired on 31 December 2008. Between these dates it was powerless to control the outbreak of the August 2008 Russo-Georgian war.

1993 Mission to Moldova

The objective of the mission to Moldova is to facilitate a comprehensive and lasting political settlement of the Transnistria conflict in all its aspects, strengthening the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova within its internationally recognised borders with a special status for Transnistria.

OSCE promoted a 5+2 format as a diplomatic negotiation platform, which began in 2005, suspended by Russia and Transnistria in 2006 until it started again in 2012, before making slow progress over the next ten years. The process stopped following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine as two of the parties were then at war with each other.

In December 2022 Russia blocked the renewal of the annual mandate by limiting it to a six month period, repeated again in June 2023 to another six month period.

1995 Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Bosnian War concluded in 1995 with the Dayton Agreement with the ongoing OSCE Mission being mandated to helping to secure lasting peace and therefore to build a stable, secure, and democratic state through building sustainable democratic institutions, strengthening good governance and human rights principles, and supporting the development of a multi-national and multi-ethnic democratic society.

1998 Kosovo Mission

The OSCE Kosovo Verification Mission was established by the Permanent Council in October 1998 and shuttered in June 1999 amidst the recalcitrance of the Milosevic regime.

The 1999 OSCE Mission in Kosovo took over the work in Kosovo where it concentrates on institution and democracy building, as well as human rights.

The OSCE's refusal to police events surrounding the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence still rankles in Russia.

2001 Mission to Macedonia

The ongoing Mission to Macedonia is monitoring and supporting the implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement that put an end to the 2001 armed conflict in North Macedonia.

2001 Mission to Serbia

The current mission to Serbia started after Slobodan Milošević lost his power as President of Serbia and Montenegro in 2000. The mission was mandated to assist the authorities and civil society with democratic development and human rights protection, including the rights of persons belonging to national minorities. To promote democratisation, tolerance and the rule of law.

2006 Mission to Montenegro

The current mission began with the 2006 Montenegrin independence referendum, monitored by OSCE, with a mandate being granted with the objective of assisting and promoting the implementation of OSCE principles and commitments including the politico-military and human aspects of security and stability.

2012 Texas election

Before the U.S. presidential elections of November 2012, the OSCE announced its intention to send electoral observers to Texas and to other U.S. states. This prompted the Attorney General of Texas Greg Abbott to send letters to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to the OSCE, threatening to arrest OSCE officials if they should enter electoral premises in Texas and break Texas law. In reply, the U.S. Department of State stated that OSCE observers enjoyed immunities. In the event, no incidents between OSCE and Texas authorities were recorded during the elections.

2017 Turkey constitutional referendum

In April 2017, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan criticized the OSCE for reporting that opposition "No" campaigners in the Turkish constitutional referendum had faced bans, police interventions and arrests. Erdoğan said: "Now the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe says if the result is 'yes', that means there are a lot of problems. Who are you? First of all, you should know your place. This is not your duty."

OSCE involvement in Ukraine (2014–2021)

OSCE SMM monitoring the movement of heavy weaponry in eastern Ukraine

On 21 March 2014, the OSCE deployed its Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine at the request of Ukraine's government. The mission has received mixed reviews. While some observers have applauded its function as the "eyes and ears of the international community", others have accused the mission of bias towards either Russia or Ukraine.

On 27 April 2014, the Girkin group that had taken control in the city of Sloviansk took eight members of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (OSCE SMM) as hostages. The group appointed Vyacheslav Ponomarev as mayor of the city.

During the war in Donbas, an OSCE observer allowed Russian separatists to travel in a vehicle with the organization's markings; this prompted allegations that the OSCE was biased in the war and not interested in carrying out its duties of mediating a ceasefire. The organization issued a statement regretting the incident.

Moreover, the OSCE Observer Mission at Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk (which is organizationally separate from the Special Monitoring Mission) also received criticism alleging that only two checkpoints on the Russian–Ukrainian border are currently being monitored, which Daniel Baer, the US ambassador to the OSCE at the time, described as "seriously inadequate".

The mission has been criticized for taking months to deploy drones to help monitor borders as well as withdrawing them after only several weeks of use due to Russian electronic attacks. Drones have been reintroduced to observe the conflict in 2018.

In 2014, an advisor to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence wrongly claimed that approximately 80% of the OSCE observers located near Mariupol were Russian citizens and that many had ties to Russian security agencies such as the FSB and the GRU. In reality, one observer out of 17 in Mariupol was a Russian citizen. In total, the mission reports the number of Russian citizens in its ranks as 39 out of 720, or 5,4%. The organization has also been accused of allegedly revealing the locations of Ukrainian troops to Russian forces during the conflict.

On 1 December 2014, the mission was in the area to "facilitate a local ceasefire and monitor the repair works on a power station", that it "heard an exchange of artillery fire between unspecified parties", and that "artillery rounds were impacting at approximately 1km to the east of the SMM's position; therefore the SMM left due to security concerns". Furthermore, the report states that the "SMM team in the JCCC was in constant contact with the SMM team in Staromikhailivka". No mention of a wounded observer is made.

On 27 October 2015, a suspended OSCE monitor confirmed he had been a former employee of Russia's Main Intelligence Directorate. The suspended SMM stated that he had no trouble receiving the position and neither the OSCE nor Ukraine's Security Service thoroughly checked his background. Following the report the OSCE issued a comment stating the monitor had been fired due to violations of the organization's code of conduct.

On 6 April 2016, photos of OSCE monitors attending the wedding of a Russian separatist emerged. The wedding had taken place in June 2015. The OSCE expressed regret over the incident, issuing a statement saying "The unprofessional behaviour displayed by the monitors in the picture is an individual incident that should not be abused to cast a shadow on the reputation of other mission members." The OSCE reported that the monitors were no longer with the OSCE special monitoring mission.

In April 2017, an OSCE vehicle struck a mine, which killed one SMM member and injured two. Two armoured vehicles were on patrol near Luhansk when one struck the mine. The dead man was an American paramedic, while the injured included a woman from Germany and a man from the Czech Republic.

On 18 July 2018, the German broadcaster ARD reported that Russian intelligence services had received inside information about the activities of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine from a staff member of the OSCE. The insider information consisted of observers' preferences in alcohol and women, their financial situation, and their contacts in Ukraine. The OSCE issued a statement expressing concern over the alleged security breach.

Russia has accused members of the Mission of working for the Ukrainian SBU and of spying on the pro-Russian separatists. Furthermore, Russia has accused the mission of bias after it reported troop movements from separatist forces, accusing the mission of ignoring similar moves from Ukraine. Russia's foreign minister also has claimed that the mission failed to pay sufficient attention to human and minority rights within the Government-controlled areas of Ukraine. Furthermore, he criticised that the mission did not clearly attribute ceasefire violations to either side.

2022 Mission to Armenia

An OSCE Needs Assessment Team was sent to Armenia between 21 and 27 October 2022 following the Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis. The request was made by the government of Armenia. The OSCE sent international experts to monitor the Armenia–Azerbaijan border.

OSCE involvement in Ukraine (2022–present)

The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine began on February 24. The OSCE mandate in Ukraine expired on March 31, 2022, due to objections by Russia. On April 24, 2022, the OSCE protested the detention of four staff members in Donetsk and Luhansk, without specifying who had detained them. On 20 September, two Ukrainian OSCE staffers were sentenced to 13 years of prison by a court in the Luhansk People's Republic for "alleged high treason and espionage for the United States."

In March 2022, 45 participating States promoted, with the support of Ukraine, the activation of the Moscow Mechanism for the establishment of an independent expert mission on violations and abuses committed in the war of the Russian Federation, supported by Belarus, against Ukraine. The report of the Mission of Experts was presented to the OSCE Permanent Council on 13 April 2022 and documented clear patterns of violations of international humanitarian law by the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine. OSCE/ODIHR continues to monitor the violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine.

On 2 June 2022, the same 45 participating States invoked again the Moscow Mechanism to establish a new mission of experts to consider, follow up and build upon the findings of the Moscow Mechanism report published in April 2022. The subsequent report, presented on 14 July 2022 to the OSCE Permanent Council, confirmed the outcomes of the previous mission and identified blatant violations of international humanitarian law, mainly attributable to the Russian armed forces, as well as widespread violations of human rights, especially in the territories under effective control of the Russian Federation.

The Russian delegation was not invited to the 29th OSCE Ministerial Council in December 2022 where the delegates considered the ramifications and regional security challenges created by Russia's continued war against Ukraine. There were calls to assess the reparations that Russia should be accountable for.

Since the start of its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has seized €2.7 million worth of armored vehicles that were previously part of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine. According to a letter that was sent by Russian OSCE representatives to OSCE Secretary-General Helga Schmid in January 2023, 71 trucks and cars were brought to the Luhansk People's Republic and the Donetsk People's Republic as "evidence" and criminal proceedings were initiated against former OSCE personnel for espionage.

OSCE Parliamentary Assembly

Main article: Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

In 2004, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly sent election observers to the U.S. presidential elections. The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly's president at the time was Democratic Congressman Alcee Hastings. Hastings had previously been impeached for corruption by the U.S. Congress. The OSCE faced criticism of partisanship and double standards due to Hastings's past and the fact that the OSCE's mandate was to promote democracy and the values of civil society.

In 2010, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe was criticized from within by the Latvian delegation for lacking transparency and democracy. Spencer Oliver (b. 1938) secretary general of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, who held the post from the organization's inception in 1992 until 2015, faced a challenge from the Latvian Artis Pabriks. According to the rules of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the incumbent general secretary can only be replaced with a full consensus minus one. Pabriks called the rules "quite shocking from the perspective of an organization that's monitoring elections".

Synopsis and list of members

Languages

The six official languages of the OSCE are English, French, German, Italian, Spanish and Russian.

Participating states

OSCE signatories as of 2012   signed Helsinki Final Act and Paris Charter   signed Helsinki Final Act only   non-signatory participant   partner for cooperation
State Admission Signed the
Helsinki Final Act Charter of Paris
 Albania 19 June 1991 16 September 1991 17 September 1991
 Andorra 25 April 1996 10 November 1999 17 February 1998
 Armenia 30 January 1992 8 July 1992 17 April 1992
 Austria 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Azerbaijan 30 January 1992 8 July 1992 20 December 1993
 Belarus 30 January 1992 26 February 1992 8 April 1993
 Belgium 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Bosnia and Herzegovina 30 April 1992 8 July 1992
 Bulgaria 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Canada 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Croatia 24 March 1992 8 July 1992  
 Cyprus 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Czech Republic 1 January 1993    
 Denmark 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Estonia 10 September 1991 14 October 1991 6 December 1991
 Finland 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 France 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Georgia 24 March 1992 8 July 1992 21 January 1994
 Germany
→ as  West Germany
→ as  East Germany
25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Greece 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Holy See 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Hungary 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Iceland 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Ireland 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Italy 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Kazakhstan 30 January 1992 8 July 1992 23 September 1992
 Kyrgyzstan 30 January 1992 8 July 1992 3 June 1994
 Latvia 10 September 1991 14 October 1991 6 December 1991
 Liechtenstein 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Lithuania 10 September 1991 14 October 1991 6 December 1991
 Luxembourg 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Malta 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Moldova 30 January 1992 26 February 1992 29 January 1993
 Monaco 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Mongolia 21 November 2012
 Montenegro 22 June 2006 1 September 2006
 Netherlands 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 North Macedonia 12 October 1995 8 July 1992  
 Norway 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Poland 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Portugal 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Romania 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Russia (as  Soviet Union) 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 San Marino 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Serbia (as  Yugoslavia) 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Slovakia 1 January 1993    
 Slovenia 24 March 1992 8 July 1992 8 March 1993
 Spain 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Sweden 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Switzerland 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Tajikistan 30 January 1992 26 February 1992
 Turkey 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Turkmenistan 30 January 1992 8 July 1992
 Ukraine 30 January 1992 26 February 1992 16 June 1992
 United Kingdom 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 United States 25 June 1973 1 August 1975 21 November 1990
 Uzbekistan 30 January 1992 26 February 1992 27 October 1993

Partners for co-operation

Middle East and North Africa States
Asia
Oceania

Legal status

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A unique aspect of the OSCE is the non-binding status of its constitutive charter. Rather than being a formal treaty ratified by national legislatures, the Helsinki Final Act represents a political commitment by the heads of government of all signatories to build security and cooperation in Europe on the basis of its provisions. This allows the OSCE to remain a flexible process for the evolution of improved cooperation, which avoids disputes and/or sanctions over implementation.

By agreeing to these commitments, signatories for the first time accepted that treatment of citizens within their borders was also a matter of legitimate international concern. This open process of the OSCE is often given credit for helping build democracy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, thus leading to the end of the Cold War. Unlike most international intergovernmental organizations, however, the OSCE does not have international legal personality on account of the lack of legal effect of its charter. As a result, its headquarters' host, Austria, had to confer legal personality on the organization in order to be able to sign a legal agreement regarding its presence in Vienna.

Structure and institutions

Political direction to the organization is given by heads of state or government during summits. Summits are not regular or scheduled but held as needed. The last summit took place in Astana (Kazakhstan), on 1 and 2 December 2010. The high-level decision-making body of the organization is the OSCE Ministerial Council, which meets at the end of every year. At the ambassadorial level, the OSCE Permanent Council convenes weekly in Vienna and serves as the regular negotiating and decision-making body. The chairman of the Permanent Council is the ambassador to the Organization of the participating State which holds the chairmanship.

In addition to the Ministerial Council and Permanent Council, the Forum for Security Co-operation is also an OSCE decision-making body. It deals predominantly with matters of military co-operation, such as modalities for inspections according to the Vienna Document of 1999.

The OSCE's Secretariat is located in Vienna, Austria. The organization also has offices in Copenhagen, Geneva, The Hague, Prague and Warsaw.

A meeting of the OSCE Permanent Council at the Hofburg in Vienna, Austria

As of October 2021, the OSCE employed 3,568 staff, including 609 in its secretariat and institutions and 2,959 in its 17 field operations.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe is made up of 323 parliamentarians from 57 member states. The Parliamentary Assembly performs its functions mainly via the Standing Committee, the Bureau, and 3 General Committees (Committee on Political Affairs and Security, Committee on Economic Affairs, Science, Technology and Environment, and Committee on Democracy, Human Rights and Humanitarian Questions).

The Parliamentary Assembly passes resolutions on matters such as political and security affairs, economic and environmental issues, and democracy and human rights. Representing the collective voice of OSCE parliamentarians, these resolutions and recommendations are meant to ensure that all participating states live up to their OSCE commitments. The Parliamentary Assembly also engages in parliamentary diplomacy, and has an extensive election observation program.

The Młodziejowski Palace in Warsaw, the seat of the ODIHR

The oldest OSCE institution is the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), established in 1991 following a decision made at the 1990 Summit of Paris. It is based in Warsaw, Poland, and is active throughout the OSCE area in the fields of election observation, democratic development, human rights, tolerance and non-discrimination, rule of law, and Roma and Sinti issues. The ODIHR has observed over 300 elections and referendums since 1995, sending more than 50,000 observers. It has operated outside its own area twice, sending a team that offered technical support to the 9 October 2004 presidential elections in Afghanistan, an OSCE Partner for Co-operation, and an election support team to assist with parliamentary and provincial council elections on 18 September 2005. ODIHR is headed by Matteo Mecacci, Italy.

The Office of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, established in December 1997, acts as a watchdog to provide early warning on violations of freedom of expression in OSCE participating States. The representative also assists participating States by advocating and promoting full compliance with OSCE norms, principles and commitments regarding freedom of expression and free media. As of 2020, the current representative is Teresa Ribeiro, Portugal.

The High Commissioner on National Minorities was created on 8 July 1992 by the Helsinki Summit Meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. It is charged with identifying and seeking early resolution of ethnic tension that might endanger peace, stability or friendly relations between participating states. As of 2020, the current representative is Kairat Abdrakhmanov (Kazakhstan).

Each year the OSCE holds an OSCE Asian Conference with partner nations (currently Australia, Thailand, South Korea, Japan and Afghanistan).

The OSCE and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic established the OSCE Academy in 2002. The aim of the OSCE Academy is "to promote regional cooperation, conflict prevention and good governance in Central Asia through offering post-graduate education, professional training and intellectual exchange."

List

Field operations

Almost all field operations of OSCE have been conducted in countries of former Yugoslavia and the former Soviet Union.

Active

The following field missions are currently active:

Mission Region Deployed Notes
Presence in Albania  Albania 1999
Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina  Bosnia and Herzegovina 1995 Dayton Agreement
Mission in Kosovo  Kosovo 1999 Kosovo Conflict
Mission to Montenegro  Montenegro 2006
Mission to Serbia  Serbia 2001
Mission to Skopje  North Macedonia 2001 Ohrid Agreement (2001)
Mission to Moldova  Moldova 1992 Transnistria conflict
Centre in Ashgabat  Turkmenistan 1999
Programme Office in Astana  Kazakhstan 1998
Programme Office in Bishkek  Kyrgyzstan 1998
Programme Office in Dushanbe  Tajikistan 1994
Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan  Uzbekistan 1995
Personal Representative of the Chairman-in-Office on the Conflict Dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference  Armenia
 Azerbaijan
1995 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Discontinued

The following field missions have been completed, closed or discontinued:

Mission Region Start End Notes
Missions of Long Duration in Kosovo, Sandjak and Vojvodina Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
  Kosovo
  Sandjak
  Vojvodina
8 September 1992 July 1993 Yugoslav wars
Mission to Georgia  Georgia November 1992 31 December 2008
Mission to Estonia  Estonia 15 February 1993 31 December 2001
Mission to Latvia  Latvia 19 November 1993 31 December 2001
Mission to Ukraine  Ukraine 24 November 1994 30 April 1999
Representative to the Estonian Expert Commission on Military Pensioners  Estonia 1994 1996
Liaison Office in Central Asia  Uzbekistan 16 March 1995 December 2000
Representative to the Joint Committee on the Skrunda Radar Station  Latvia 6 April 1995 31 October 1999
Assistance Group to Chechnya  Russia
  Chechnya
26 April 1995 16 December 1998 First Chechen War
Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office for Article IV, Annex 1-B of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina  Bosnia and Herzegovina 1995 2015 Dayton Agreement
Mission to Croatia / Office in Zagreb  Croatia July 1996 17 January 2012 Croatian War of Independence
Advisory and Monitoring Group in Belarus  Belarus January 1998 31 December 2002
Kosovo Verification Mission / Task force for Kosovo Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
  Kosovo
October 1998 June 1999 Kosovo conflict
Office in Yerevan  Armenia 16 February 2000 31 August 2017
Office in Baku / Project Co-ordinator in Baku  Azerbaijan July 2000 31 December 2015
Office in Minsk  Belarus 1 January 2003 31 March 2011
Observer Mission at the Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk  Russia 24 July 2014 30 September 2021
Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine  Ukraine March 2014 March 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war
Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine  Ukraine June 1999 March 2022
Needs Assessment Team in Armenia  Armenia 21 October 2022 27 October 2022 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Chairmanship

OSCE Permanent Council venue at the Hofburg, Vienna

The OSCE chairmanship is assumed at yearly intervals by one participating state, which then plays the central role in managing the organization's work and in its external representation. The foreign minister of the country possessing the chair holds the OSCE's most senior position as chairman-in-office (CiO).

The responsibilities of the chairman-in-office include:

  • co-ordination of the work of OSCE institutions;
  • representing the OSCE;
  • supervising activities related to conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation.

The CiO is assisted by the previous and incoming chairmen-in-office; the three of them together constitute the OSCE Troika. The CiO nominates personal representatives – experts in fields of priority for the CiO. The origin of the institution lies with the Charter of Paris for a New Europe (1990), and the Helsinki Document (1992) formally institutionalized this function.

The OSCE chair for 2022 was Poland, with Zbigniew Rau serving as chairman-in-office. The chair for 2023 is North Macedonia, represented by Bujar Osmani as chairman-in-office.

Chairmanship history

Chairmanship of the OSCE is held by a member state on a calendar-year basis, with the minister for foreign affairs of that state performing the function of chairman-in-office. The table below shows the holders since 1991. Estonia was due to hold the chairmanship in 2024, however, this was not approved following objections from Russia and Belarus.

Year Country Chairman-in-Office
1991  Germany Hans-Dietrich Genscher (from June)
1992  Czechoslovakia Jiří Dienstbier (until 2 July); Jozef Moravčík (from 3 July)
1993  Sweden Margaretha af Ugglas
1994  Italy Beniamino Andreatta (until 11 May); Antonio Martino (from 12 May)
1995  Hungary László Kovács
1996   Switzerland Flavio Cotti
1997  Denmark Niels Helveg Petersen
1998  Poland Bronisław Geremek
1999  Norway Knut Vollebæk
2000  Austria Wolfgang Schüssel (until 4 February); Benita Ferrero-Waldner (from 5 February)
2001  Romania Mircea Geoană
2002  Portugal Jaime Gama (until 6 April); António Martins da Cruz (from 7 April)
2003  Netherlands Jaap de Hoop Scheffer (until 3 December); Bernard Bot (from 4 December)
2004  Bulgaria Solomon Passy
2005  Slovenia Dimitrij Rupel
2006  Belgium Karel De Gucht
2007  Spain Miguel Ángel Moratinos
2008  Finland Ilkka Kanerva (until 4 April); Alexander Stubb (from 5 April)
2009  Greece Dora Bakoyannis (until 5 October); George Papandreou (from 6 October)
2010  Kazakhstan Kanat Saudabayev
2011  Lithuania Audronius Ažubalis
2012  Ireland Eamon Gilmore
2013  Ukraine Leonid Kozhara
2014   Switzerland Didier Burkhalter
2015  Serbia Ivica Dačić
2016  Germany Frank-Walter Steinmeier
2017  Austria Sebastian Kurz (until 18 December); Karin Kneissl (from 18 December)
2018  Italy Angelino Alfano (until 1 June); Enzo Moavero Milanesi (from 1 June)
2019  Slovakia Miroslav Lajčák
2020  Albania Edi Rama
2021  Sweden Ann Linde
2022  Poland Zbigniew Rau
2023  North Macedonia Bujar Osmani
2024  Malta Ian Borg
2025  Finland

Secretary general

While the chairman-in-office is the OSCE's most senior official, on a day-to-day basis the secretary general is the OSCE's chief administrative officer and can, when requested by the chairmanship, serve as a representative of the chairman-in-office. Since the establishment of the office in 1992, the secretaries general have been:

Secretary General Country Term of office
Wilhelm Höynck [de]  Germany 1993–1996
Giancarlo Aragona  Italy 1996–1999
Ján Kubiš  Slovakia 1999–2005
Marc Perrin de Brichambaut  France 2005–2011
Lamberto Zannier  Italy 2011–2017
Thomas Greminger  Switzerland 2017–2020
Helga Schmid  Germany 2020–2024
Feridun Sinirlioğlu  Turkey 2024–

Summits of heads of state and government

Summit Date Location Country Decisions
I 30 July – 1 August 1975 Helsinki  Finland Closing of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE). Signing of the Final Act (Helsinki Act).
II 19–21 November 1990 Paris  France (Second CSCE Summit). Signing of the Charter of Paris for a New Europe (Paris Charter), the Vienna Confidence and Security Building Measures (CSBM) Document and the CFE Treaty.
III 9–10 July 1992 Helsinki  Finland Final Document: The Challenges of Change. Creation of the High Commissioner on National Minorities, the Forum for Security Co-operation and the Economic Forum. Suspension of FR Yugoslavia from membership.
IV 5–6 December 1994 Budapest  Hungary Final Document: Towards a Genuine Partnership in a New Era. Approval of a multi-national peace-keeping force to Nagorno-Karabakh. Endorsement of the Code of Conduct on politico-military aspects of security.
V 2–3 December 1996 Lisbon  Portugal (First OSCE Summit). Lisbon Declaration on a Common and Comprehensive Security Model for Europe for the Twenty-First Century. Adoption of a Framework for Arms Control.
VI 18–19 November 1999 Istanbul  Turkey Signing of the Istanbul Document and the Charter for European Security.
VII 1–2 December 2010 Astana  Kazakhstan Adoption of the Astana Commemorative Declaration, which reconfirms the Organization's comprehensive approach to security based on trust and transparency.

Ministerial Council Meetings (ordinary)

Council Date Location Country Decisions Doc
1st 19–20 June 1991 Berlin  Germany Admission of Albania
10 September 1991 Moscow  Russia Question of the admission of the Republics of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
2nd 30–31 January 1992 Prague  Czechoslovakia Admission of ten former Soviet republics.
3rd 14–15 December 1992 Stockholm  Sweden Creation of the post of Secretary General and appointment of Max van der Stoel as first High Commissioner on National Minorities.
4th 30 November –
1 December 1993
Rome  Italy Establishment of the Mission to Tajikistan.
5th 7–8 December 1995 Budapest  Hungary Establishment of the Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina to carry out the tasks assigned to the OSCE in the Dayton Peace Agreements.
6th 18–19 December 1997 Copenhagen  Denmark Creation of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities and the Representative on Freedom of the Media.
7th 2–3 December 1998 Oslo  Norway
8th 27–28 November 2000 Vienna  Austria Vienna Declaration on the OSCE's activities in South-Eastern Europe. Re-admission of FR Yugoslavia.
9th 3–4 December 2001 Bucharest  Romania Bucharest Declaration. Bucharest Plan of Action for Combating Terrorism. Creation of the Strategic Police Matters Unit and a Senior Police Adviser in the OSCE Secretariat.
10th 6–7 December 2002 Porto  Portugal Porto Declaration: Responding to Change. OSCE Charter on Preventing and Combating Terrorism.
11th 1–2 December 2003 Maastricht  Netherlands Strategy to Address Threats to Security and Stability in the Twenty-First Century. Strategy Document for the Economic and Environmental Dimension.
12th 6–7 December 2004 Sofia  Bulgaria
13th 5–6 December 2005 Ljubljana  Slovenia Statement on the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism. Approval of the Border Security and Management Concept.
14th 4–5 December 2006 Brussels  Belgium Brussels Declaration on Criminal Justice Systems. Ministerial Statement on Supporting and Promoting the International Legal Framework against Terrorism.
15th 29–30 November 2007 Madrid  Spain Madrid Declaration on Environment and Security. Ministerial Statement on Supporting the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy.
16th 4–5 December 2008 Helsinki  Finland
17th 1–2 December 2009 Athens  Greece Ministerial Declarations on Non-Proliferation and on the OSCE Corfu Process.
16–17 July 2010 Almaty  Kazakhstan Informal discussions on Corfu Process progress, the situation in Kyrgyzstan and the forthcoming OSCE summit.
18th 6–7 December 2011 Vilnius  Lithuania Decisions on responses to conflicts and transnational threats; to enhance capabilities in early warning; early action; dialogue facilitation and mediation support; and post-conflict rehabilitation. Decisions to enhance engagement with OSCE Partners for Co-operation, Afghanistan in particular.
19th 6–7 December 2012 Dublin  Ireland Helsinki+40 Process: clear path to the 2015 40th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, intent to reinforce and revitalize the OSCE; unanimous support for Transnistrian settlement process: negotiated, comprehensive, just and viable solution to the conflict; strengthening good governance: deepening engagement in preventing and countering corruption, addressing transnational threats, and adding an anti-terrorism framework to earlier decisions on threats from information and communication technologies, drugs and chemical precursors and strategic policing; despite Ireland's hopes, a decision on human rights was not reached: greater, still, was concern for the council's trend of human rights decision-failures.
20th 5–6 December 2013 Kyiv  Ukraine Decision on the combating trafficking in human beings. Decision on the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief. Ministerial Declaration on Strengthening the OSCE's Efforts to Address Transnational Threats. Decision on the improving the environmental footprint of energy-related activities in the OSCE region. Ministerial Declaration on the Update of the OSCE Principles Governing Non-Proliferation. Decision on the enhancing OSCE efforts to implement the Action Plan on Improving the Situation of Roma and Sinti Within the OSCE Area, With a Particular Focus on Roma and Sinti Women, Youth and Children. Ministerial Statement on the Work of the Permanent Conference on Political Issues in the Framework of the Negotiation Process for the Transnistrian Settlement in the 5+2 format. Declaration on Furthering the Helsinki+40 Process. Decision on the small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Decision on the protection of energy networks from natural and man-made disasters.
21st 4–5 December 2014 Basel   Switzerland Declaration on further steps in the Helsinki+40 Process. Ministerial statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. Declaration on youth. Declaration on the Transfer of Ownership to the Parties to the Agreement on Sub-regional Arms Control, Annex 1B, Article IV of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Declaration on the OSCE role in countering the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters in the context of the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions 2170 and 2178. Declaration on the OSCE role in countering kidnapping and hostage-taking committed by terrorist groups in the context of the implementation of the UN Security Council resolution 2133. Decision on the prevention of corruption. Decision on enhancing disaster risk reduction. Decision on preventing and combating violence against women. Decision on an addendum to the 2004 OSCE Action Plan for the Promotion of Gender Equality. Ministerial commemorative declaration on the seventieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War. Declaration on enhancing efforts to combat anti-Semitism. Declaration on co-operation with the Mediterranean Partners. Ministerial declaration on co-operation with the Asian Partners. Decision on small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Commemorative Declaration on the Occasion of the Twentieth Anniversary of the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security.
22nd 3–4 December 2015 Belgrade  Serbia Ministerial Declaration on Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism and Radicalization that lead to Terrorism. Declaration on the OSCE Activities in Support of Global Efforts in Tackling the World Drug Problem. Ministerial Declaration on Reinforcing OSCE Efforts to Counter Terrorism in the Wake of Recent Terrorist Attacks. Declaration on Youth and Security. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format.
23st 8–9 December 2016 Hamburg  Germany Decision on the OSCE's role in the governance of large movements of migrants and refugees. Decision on strengthening good governance and promoting connectivity. Decision on OSCE efforts related to reducing the risks of conflict stemming from the use of information and communication technologies. Declaration on strengthening OSCE efforts to prevent and counter terrorism. Decision on enhancing the use of Advance Passenger Information. Ministerial statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format.
24th 7–8 December 2017 Vienna  Austria Decision on enhancing OSCE efforts to reduce the risk of conflict stemming from the use of information and communication technologies. Decision on strengthening efforts to prevent trafficking in human beings. Decision on strengthening efforts to combat all forms of child trafficking, including for sexual exploitation, as well as other forms of sexual exploitation of children. Decision on promoting economic participation in the OSCE area. Decision on small arms and light weapons and stockpiles of conventional ammunition. Ministerial Statement on the negotiations on the Transnistrian settlement process in the 5+2 format.
25th 6–7 December 2018 Milan  Italy Decision on Safety of Journalists. Decision on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women. Decision on Human Capital Development in the Digital Era. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format. Declaration on the Digital Economy a Driver for Promoting Co-operation, Security and Growth. Declaration on the Role of Youth in Contribution to Peace and Security Efforts. Declaration on Security and Co-operation in the Mediterranean. Declaration on OSCE Efforts in the Field of Norms and Best Practices on Small Arms and Light Weapons and Stockpiles of Conventional Ammunition.
26th 5–6 December 2019 Bratislava  Slovakia Commemorative Declaration on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of the OSCE Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the "5+2" Format. Document No. 2, Commemorative. Declaration on the Occasion of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the OSCE Principles Governing Non-Proliferation and Fifteenth Anniversary of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540.
27th 3–4 December 2020 Tirana  Albania Decision on Preventing and Combating Corruption through Digitalization and Increased Transparency. Decision on Prevention and Eradication of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Declaration on Strengthening Co-operation in Countering Transnational Organized Crime. Declaration on Co-operation With the OSCE Asian Partners. Ministerial Statement on the Negotiations on the Transnistrian Settlement Process in the 5+2 format.
28th 2–3 December 2021 Stockholm  Sweden
29th 1–2 December 2022 Łódź  Poland For the first time a delegation was not invited, Russia was not permitted to attend because of the ongoing invasion of Ukraine. The President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Margareta Cederfelt said: "This OSCE Ministerial Council should take steps to establish a high-level body to examine the damages inflicted by the Russian Federation on Ukraine, and to assess the reparations that Russia should be accountable for. Russia started this war, and it must pay for it." Most OSCE participating states support an initiative by Ukraine to create a special tribunal to prosecute Russia for the crime of aggression.
30th 29 November – 1 December 2023 Skopje  North Macedonia
31st 5–6 December 2024  Malta
32nd 2025 Helsinki  Finland

Fiscal history

Since 1993, the OSCE's budget by year (in millions of euro) has been:

  • 2021 ... €138.2 million
  • 2020 ... €138.2 million
  • 2019 ... €138.2 million
  • 2018 ... €137.8 million
  • 2017 ... €139.0 million
  • 2016 ... €141.1 million
  • 2015 ... €141.1 million
  • 2014 ... €142.3 million
  • 2013 ... €144.8 million
  • 2012 ... €148.4 million
  • 2011 ... €150.0 million
  • 2010 ... €150.7 million
  • 2009 ... €158.6 million
  • 2008 ... €164.1 million
  • 2007 ... €186.2 million
  • 2006 ... €186.2 million
  • 2005 ... €186.6 million
  • 2004 ... €180.8 million
  • 2003 ... €165.5 million
  • 2002 ... €167.5 million
  • 2001 ... €194.5 million
  • 2000 ... €202.7 million
  • 1999 ... €146.1 million
  • 1998 ... €118.7 million
  • 1997 ... €43.3 million
  • 1996 ... €34.9 million
  • 1995 ... €18.9 million
  • 1994 ... €21 million
  • 1993 ... €12 million
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Relations with the United Nations

The OSCE considers itself a regional organization in the sense of Chapter VIII of the United Nations Charter and is an observer in the United Nations General Assembly. The Chairman-in-Office gives routine briefings to the United Nations Security Council.

The three dimensions

Politico-military dimension (first dimension)

The OSCE takes a comprehensive approach to the politico-military dimension of security, which includes a number of commitments by participating States and mechanisms for conflict prevention and resolution. The organization also seeks to enhance military security by promoting greater openness, transparency and co-operation.

Arms control

The end of the Cold War resulted in a huge amount of surplus weapons becoming available in what is known as the international grey market for weapons. The OSCE helps to stop the—often illegal—spread of such weapons and offers assistance with their destruction. The OSCE hosts the annual exchange of information under the Conventional Forces in Europe treaty. The OSCE has also implemented two additional exchanges of information, the Vienna Document and the Global Exchange of Military Information. The Open Skies Consultative Commission, the implementing body for the Treaty on Open Skies, meets monthly at its Vienna headquarters.

Border management

The actions taken by the OSCE in border monitoring range from conflict prevention to post-conflict management, capacity building and institutional support.

Combating terrorism

With its expertise in conflict prevention, crisis management and early warning, the OSCE contributes to worldwide efforts in combating terrorism.

Conflict prevention

The OSCE works to prevent conflicts from arising and to facilitate lasting comprehensive political settlements for existing conflicts. It also helps with the process of rehabilitation in post-conflict areas.

Military reform

The OSCE's Forum for Security Co-operation provides a framework for political dialogue on military reform, while practical activities are conducted by field operations, as well as the Conflict Prevention Centre.

Policing

OSCE police operations are an integral part of the organization's efforts in conflict prevention and post-conflict rehabilitation.

Implementation

The OSCE was a rather small organization until selection by the international community to provide electoral organization to post war Bosnia and Herzegovina in early 1996. Ambassador Frowick was the first OSCE representative to initiate national election in September 1996, human rights issues and rule of law specifically designed to provide a foundation for judicial organization within Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The OSCE had regional offices and field offices, to include the office in Brcko in northeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina which remained in limbo until the Brcko Arbitration Agreement could be decided, finalized and implemented.

Brcko become a "special district" and remains so today.

The OSCE essentially took the place of the United Nations in Bosnia and Herzegovina in part because the Bosnian leadership felt deep contempt for the UN efforts to stop the war which began in 1991 and ended in 1995. During the time the United Nations were attempting a political solution, thousands of UN troops were posted in and around Bosnia and Herzegovina with special emphasis on Sarajevo. From 1991 to 1995, over 200,000 Bosnians were killed and over one million displaced and another million as refugees.

The OSCE continues to have a presence and a number of initiatives to bring a sustained peace to the region.

Economic and environmental dimension (second dimension)

Activities in the economic and environmental dimension include the monitoring of developments related to economic and environmental security in OSCE participating States, with the aim of alerting them to any threat of conflict; assisting States in the creation of economic and environmental policies, legislation and institutions to promote security in the OSCE region.

Economic activities

Among the economic activities of the OSCE feature activities related to migration management, transport and energy security. Most activities are implemented in co-operation with partner organizations.

Environmental activities

The OSCE has developed a range of activities in the environmental sphere aimed at addressing ecologic threats to security in its participating States. Among the activities feature projects in the area of hazardous waste, water management and access to information under the Aarhus Convention.

Human dimension (third dimension)

The commitments made by OSCE participating States in the human dimension aim to ensure full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; to abide by the rule of law; to promote the principles of democracy by building, strengthening and protecting democratic institutions; and to promote tolerance throughout the OSCE region.

Combating trafficking in human beings

Since 2003, the OSCE has had an established mechanism for combating trafficking in human beings, as defined by Article 3 of the Palermo Protocol, which is aimed at raising public awareness of the problem and building the political will within participating states to tackle it effectively.

The OSCE actions against trafficking in human beings are coordinated by the Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings. Maria Grazia Giammarinaro, a judge in the Criminal Court of Rome, took Office as the Special Representative in March 2010. From 2006 to 2009, this Office was held by Eva Biaudet, a former Finnish Minister of Health and Social Services. Biaudet currently serves as Finnish Ombudsman for Minorities. Her predecessor was former Austrian Minister Helga Konrad, who served as the first OSCE Special Representative for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings.

The activities around Combating Trafficking in Human Beings in the OSCE Region of the Office of the Special Representative include:

  • Co-operation with governments, helping them to accept and act on their responsibilities for curbing trafficking in human beings;
  • Providing governments with decision and policy-making aids and offering guidance on anti-trafficking management, with the aim of arriving at solutions tailored to the needs of the individual countries and in line with international standards;
  • Assisting governments to develop the national anti-trafficking structures required for efficient internal and transnational co-operation;
  • Raising awareness to draw attention to the complexity of the problem and to the need for comprehensive solutions;
  • Considering all dimensions of human trafficking, namely trafficking for sexual exploitation, trafficking for forced and bonded labour, including domestic servitude, trafficking into forced marriages, trafficking in organs and trafficking in children;
  • Ensuring the effective interaction of all agents and stake holders involved in the fight against human trafficking, ranging from governmental authorities, law enforcement officials to NGOs, and—last but not least—international organizations, as the agencies providing support thorough expertise and know-how;
  • Guaranteeing the highest possible visibility of the OSCE's fight against human trafficking to focus attention on the issue.
Democratization

The OSCE claims to promote democracy and assist the participating states in building democratic institutions.

Education

Education programmes are an integral part of the organization's efforts in conflict prevention and post-conflict rehabilitation.

Elections

As part of its democratization activities, the OSCE carries out election assistance projects in the run-up to, during, and following elections. However, the effectiveness of such assistance is arguable—Kazakhstan, for example, despite being the former chair of the OSCE, is considered by many to be one of the least democratic countries in the world. Moreover, the recent democratic advances made in other Central Asian republics, notably Kyrgyzstan, have led to rumours of Soviet-style disruption of the Kyrgyz democratic process by, in particular, Kazakhstan and Russia. This may be in large part due to fears over the long-term stability of these countries' own quasi-dictatorships.

Gender equality

The equality of men and women is an integral part of sustainable democracy. The OSCE aims to provide equal opportunities for men and women and to integrate gender equality in policies and practices.

Human rights

The OSCE's human rights activities focus on such priorities as freedom of movement and religion, preventing torture and trafficking in persons.

National and international NGOs

OSCE could grant consultive status to NGOs and INGOs in the form of "Researcher-in-residence programme" (run by the Prague Office of the OSCE Secretariat): accredited representatives of national and international NGOs are granted access to all records and to numerous topical compilations related to OSCE field activities.

Media freedom

The OSCE observes relevant media developments in its participating states with a view to addressing and providing early warning on violations of freedom of expression.

Minority rights

Ethnic conflict is one of the main sources of large-scale violence in Europe today. The OSCE's approach is to identify and to seek early resolution of ethnic tensions, and to set standards for the rights of persons belonging to minority groups and High Commissioner on National Minorities has been established.

OSCE Democracy Defender Award

The Democracy Defender Award honors a person or group for contributions to the promotion of democracy and the defense of human rights "in the spirit of Helsinki Final Act and other OSCE principles and commitments." The award was established in 2016 on the initiative of Ambassadors of 8 countries, and supported by the delegations of the 18 countries of the OSCE (22 countries in 2017).

Year Recipient Nationality Notes Reference
2022 ZMINA
Memorial
 Ukraine
 Russia
Ukrainian Human Rights Centre Zmina and to the Russian Memorial Human Rights Centre in recognition of their courageous and important efforts to promote human rights and democracy.
2020 Viasna Human Rights Centre  Belarus Belarusian organisation established in 1996 which advocates for the rights of political prisoners in Belarus and against the government of Alexander Lukashenko.
2019 Union of Informed Citizens (UIC)  Armenia Armenian organisation which intends to raise public awareness on important issues and reduce the impact of misinformation on decision-making.
2018 CRTA  Serbia Serbian organisation established in 2002 to improve the democratic culture, the rule of law and the freedom of the Media
2017 Golos  Russia Russian organisation established in 2000 to protect the electoral rights of citizens and to foster civil society
2016 Oleksandra Matviychuk  Ukraine Ukrainian activist, coordinator of Euromaidan SOS and leader of Civil Rights Center

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Yugoslavia was an original signatory
  2. ^ Czechoslovakia was an original signatory
  3. Asia partner for co-operation 2004–2012.
  4. Previously referred to by the OSCE as the "Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
  5. Despite the Taliban's return to power in 2021, there is no current evidence that the OSCE has removed the country from its list of partners in cooperation.

References

  1. "OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2022". Countryeconomy.com.
  2. "OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2023". Countryeconomy.com.
  3. Galbreath, David J. (2007). The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Routledge global institutions (Volume 14). New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 9780203960943.
  4. "United Nations". www.osce.org. Archived from the original on 2 March 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2022. On 26 May 1993, a Framework for Co-operation and Co-ordination between the United Nations Secretariat and the CSCE was agreed upon, and in October of the same year, the UN granted the CSCE observer status.
  5. Galbreath, David J. (2007). The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Routledge global institutions (Volume 14). New York, NY: Routledge. p. 41. ISBN 9780203960943. Like the CSCE, the purpose was to promote trust and confidence between East and West.
  6. "Final Recommendations of the Helsinki Consultations". Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 3 July 1973. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 9 May 2015.
  7. "EU Statement on the continued crackdown on civil society in Russia". OSCE Permanent Council No. 1323. The Permanent Delegation of Norway to the OSCE. 8 July 2021. Archived from the original on 7 January 2023. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
  8. "Moscow mechanism" (PDF). OSCE. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 September 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  9. ^ "The OSCEs Istanbul Charter for European Security". NATO Review. 1 July 2000. Retrieved 13 February 2024.
  10. O'Rourke, Breffni (9 November 1999). "OSCE: Summit Hears Clinton, Yeltsin Comment On Chechnya". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 13 February 2024.
  11. ^ "U.S. invites international observers to Nov. election". USA Today. usatoday.com. 10 August 2004. Archived from the original on 15 May 2008. Retrieved 30 December 2016.
  12. "Presidential Election, 2 November 2004, United States of America" Archived 30 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Retrieved 2016-12-30.
  13. "Formin expresses regret over Russia and Belarus veto of Estonia's 2024 OSCE chairmanship". 21 November 2023.
  14. "OSCE Mission to Georgia (closed)". OSCE. n.d. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  15. "OSCE Mission to Moldova". Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  16. "OSCE Moldova mission mandate extended for six months". 30 June 2023.
  17. "OSCE MISSION TO BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA". Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  18. "RUSSIAN VIEWS OF THE OSCE ACTIVITIES". he Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia. Archived from the original on 26 June 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  19. "OSCE MISSION TO SERBIA". Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  20. "OSCE MISSION TO MONTENEGRO". Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  21. "Attorney General of Texas" (PDF). oag.state.tx.us. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 January 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
  22. "Attorney General Abbott Informs U.S. State Department that International Election Observers Cannot Circumvent Texas Law". Oag.state.tx.us. Texas Attorney General. 25 October 2012. Archived from the original on 24 October 2013. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  23. Daily Press Briefing: 26 October 2012 Archived 28 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine US State Department.
  24. "Erdogan slams OSCE ahead of constitutional referendum" Archived 8 May 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Euronews. 14 April 2017.
  25. "President Erdoğan slams OSCE over referendum campaign report Archived 8 May 2018 at the Wayback Machine". Hürriyet. 14 April 2017.
  26. "OSCE: Turkey referendum 'contested on an unlevel playing field'" Archived 8 May 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Deutsche Welle, 17 April 2017.
  27. OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine Archived 29 March 2022 at the Wayback Machine. OSCE.
  28. Stephanie, Liechtenstein (1 March 2014). "The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission has become the Eyes and Ears of the International Community on the Ground in Ukraine". Security and Human Rights. 25 (1): 5–10. doi:10.1163/18750230-02501008.
  29. Luke Harding. "Ukraine: kidnapped observers paraded by pro-Russian gunmen in Slavyansk" Archived 6 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine. The Guardian, 27 April 2014.
  30. "Наблюдатели ОБСЕ возили в своем автомобиле вооруженных боевиков" (in Russian). TSN. 3 October 2014. Archived from the original on 5 October 2014. Retrieved 4 October 2014.
  31. Marshall, Andrew (1 September 2022). "What is the Organisation for Security and Co-Operation in Europe? - Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute". bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com. Archived from the original on 29 December 2022. Retrieved 29 December 2022.
  32. "OSCE relaunches long-range surveillance drone program in Ukraine". UNIAN. 27 March 2018. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  33. "OSCE denies it gave information about Ukrainian troop positions to Russians". UNIAN. 11 November 2014. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  34. "Status Report 14 December 2020" (PDF). OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine. OSCE. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  35. "The OSCE monitoring mission has stopped using drones to monitor the situation in the rebel-held territories". OSCE news.
  36. "Миссия ОБСЕ в Украине под шквалом критики". EuroUA. Archived from the original on 15 October 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  37. "Литвин рассказал генсеку ОБСЕ, что критика в адрес Украины не всегда объективна". Gazeta. 16 September 2011. Archived from the original on 11 November 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  38. "Россия узнала от ОБСЕ места дислокации ряда подразделений сил АТО". Liga. 11 November 2014. Archived from the original on 11 November 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  39. "Минобороны: 80% сотрудников ОБСЕ в Мариуполе – россияне, среди них ФСБшники". Ukrinform. Archived from the original on 3 June 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  40. "Latest from OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) based on information received as of 18:00 (Kyiv time) 1 December 2014". OSCE.org. OSCE. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
  41. "Suspended OSCE monitor confirms he's Russian GRU officer". UNIAN. Archived from the original on 28 October 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  42. "That Time A Russian OSCE Monitor in Ukraine Got Drunk, Said Too Much". Value Walk. 30 October 2015. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
  43. Shamanska, Anna (7 April 2016). "OSCE Expresses 'Regret' After Staff Shown at Separatist Wedding in Ukraine". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Radio Free Europe. Archived from the original on 8 April 2016. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
  44. "American member of watchdog OSCE killed in Ukraine". Reuters. 24 April 2017. Archived from the original on 4 July 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  45. ^ "Land Mine Kills American on Monitoring Mission in Ukraine". The New York Times. Reuters. 23 April 2017. Archived from the original on 31 December 2017. Retrieved 24 April 2017.
  46. "OSCE Ukraine mission says claim of Russian spying 'big blow'". France24. 18 July 2018. Archived from the original on 18 July 2018. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  47. Miller, Christopher (18 July 2016). "Russia Detains OSCE Monitor, Accuses Him Of Spying For Ukraine". Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  48. "Ukraine crisis: Russia accuses OSCE monitors of bias". BBC. 14 November 2014. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  49. "Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov unhappy with OSCE SMM's performance in Ukraine". UNIAN. 12 August 2020. Archived from the original on 21 September 2020. Retrieved 8 January 2021.
  50. "OSCE sends a needs assessment team to Armenia". 19 October 2022.
  51. "OSCE Chairman-in-Office and Secretary General call for immediate release of detained OSCE officials in areas of Donetsk and Luhansk". Archived from the original on 25 April 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
  52. Liechtenstein, Stephanie (20 September 2022). "OSCE Ukrainian staff members sentenced in Russian-separatist kangaroo court". Politico. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
  53. "Attivazione del Meccanismo di Mosca dell'OSCE sui diritti umani in relazione all'attacco russo in Ucraina". delegazioneosce.esteri.it (in Italian). Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 27 December 2022.
  54. "Statement by Ambassador Jocelyn Kinnear on the invocation of the Moscow mechanism to address the human rights and humanitarian impacts of Russia's invasion and acts of war against Ukraine". 3 March 2022. Archived from the original on 30 May 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  55. "Report on violations of international humanitarian and human rights law, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Ukraine since 24 february 2022" (PDF). osce.org. 12 April 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 June 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  56. "The legal framework applicable to the armed conflict in Ukraine". www.osce.org. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  57. "Ukraine Monitoring Initiative Methodology". www.osce.org. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  58. "Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine". www.osce.org. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  59. "Second Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine". www.osce.org. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  60. "Third Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine". www.osce.org. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  61. "Fourth Interim Report on reported violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine". www.osce.org. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  62. "Nuova attivazione del Meccanismo di Mosca dell'OSCE sulla guerra di aggressione russa in Ucraina". delegazioneosce.esteri.it (in Italian). Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 27 December 2022.
  63. "Statement by France on the invocation of the Moscow Mechanism to address the human rights and humanitarian impacts of Russia's invasion and acts of war against Ukraine". delegfrance.org. 2 June 2022. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  64. "Report on violations of international humanitarian and human rights law, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Ukraine (1 April - 25 June 2022)" (PDF). osce.org. 14 July 2022. Archived from the original on 14 July 2022. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
  65. "Gestohlene Fahrzeuge, entführte Mitarbeiter: Die OSZE hadert mit Russland". derstandard.at. 13 February 2023. Retrieved 13 February 2023.
  66. "US vote 'mostly free and fair'". BBC. 5 November 2004. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
  67. An election in Copenhagen Archived 17 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine politico.com
  68. "OSCE website now available in six official languages". OSCE Secretariat. 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 7 July 2019. Retrieved 7 July 2019.
  69. "OSCE: About - Participating States". Archived from the original on 9 July 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  70. "OSCE - Partners for Co-operation". www.osce.org. Archived from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
  71. ^ "Making a credible case for a legal personality for the OSCE Archived 13 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine", OSCE Secretariat
  72. "Summits". www.osce.org. Archived from the original on 14 June 2022. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  73. "Vienna Document 1999 of the Negotiations on Confidence- and Security-building Measures" (PDF). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 16 November 1999. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 April 2005. Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  74. "What is the OSCE?". Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. p. 7. Archived from the original on 26 March 2016. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
  75. "The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly". osce.org. Archived from the original on 18 January 2018. Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  76. "2017 OSCE Asian Conference". OSCE. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
  77. "History of the Academy :: OSCE Academy in Bishkek". osce-academy.net. Archived from the original on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
  78. "Where we are". Archived from the original on 1 December 2022. Retrieved 1 December 2022.
  79. "Closed field operations and related field activities". Archived from the original on 1 December 2022. Retrieved 1 December 2022.
  80. "The OSCE Chair-in-Office (CiO)". Global Affairs. international.gc.ca. Government of Canada. Archived from the original on 12 November 2014. Retrieved 12 November 2014.
  81. "chairman-in-Office Representatives". www.osce.org. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  82. "Who we are". osce.org. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Archived from the original on 12 November 2014. Retrieved 12 November 2014.
  83. "OSCE Chairpersonship". www.osce.org. Archived from the original on 4 December 2020. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  84. "Zbigniew Rau". www.osce.org. Archived from the original on 1 December 2021. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  85. "Decision No. 5/20 OSCE Chairmanship in the Year 2023" (PDF). OSCE. 4 December 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 December 2022.
  86. "North Macedonia takes over OSCE Chair | OSCE". Archived from the original on 1 January 2023. Retrieved 1 January 2023.
  87. OSCE Magazine, issue number 4/2009 Archived 30 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine, December 2009, pages 20–23.
  88. "Is the OSCE's future in crisis? – DW – 06/09/2023". Deutsche Welle.
  89. "OSCE may collapse over Belarus, Russia's reluctance to approve Estonia's presidency, says Finnish MFA". 29 May 2023.
  90. "Feridun Sinirlioğlu". www.osce.org. Retrieved 6 December 2024.
  91. "19th OSCE Ministerial Council". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 11 November 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  92. "Russia attempting to hold OSCE hostage, chairman says". Archived from the original on 2 December 2022. Retrieved 2 December 2022.
  93. "Rau: Most OSCE states support creation of special tribunal to prosecute Russia". 2 December 2022. Archived from the original on 2 December 2022. Retrieved 2 December 2022.
  94. FoNet (24 November 2023). "Sergej Lavrov može da sleti u Skoplje". N1 (in Serbian). Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  95. "Neutral Malta to chair OSCE after Moscow blocks NATO member Estonia". Reuters. 27 November 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  96. "Funding and budget". Archived from the original on 18 August 2018. Retrieved 18 August 2018.
  97. "Secretariat - External Cooperation". OSCE. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 4 February 2011.
  98. United Nations General Assembly Session 48 Resolution 5. Observer status for the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe in the General Assembly A/RES/48/5 22 October 1993. Retrieved 2008-10-01.
  99. United Nations Security Council Verbatim Report 5982. S/PV/5982 page 2. Mr. Stubb Finland 26 September 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-01.
  100. "Arms control". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  101. "Open Skies Consultative Commission". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 15 February 2018. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  102. "Border management". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 29 November 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  103. "Combating terrorism". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  104. "Conflict prevention and resolution". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  105. "Conflict prevention and resolution". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 15 March 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  106. "Bosnia: Dayton Accords". archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  107. "UNMIBH: United Nations Mission in Bosnia Herzegovina - Background". peacekeeping.un.org. Archived from the original on 14 August 2022. Retrieved 28 June 2022.
  108. ^ "Objectives and institutions of the OSCE". 22 March 2023.
  109. ^ "Combating trafficking in human beings". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 15 March 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  110. "Palermo Protocol" (PDF). Untreaty.un.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2006.
  111. "Maria Grazia Giammarinaro". Osce.org. Archived from the original on 27 October 2011. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  112. "Combating Trafficking in Human Beings in the OSCE Region" (PDF). Osce.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 October 2009. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
  113. "Conflict Resolution through Democracy Promotion? The Role of the OSCE in Georgia". 2008. Archived from the original on 8 September 2023. Retrieved 8 September 2023.
  114. "National minority standards of the OSCE and the High Commissioner on National Minorities". Retrieved 8 September 2023.
  115. ^ "Democracy Defender Award presented at Schwedenhaus". OSCE mission in Sweden.
  116. "Russian EPDE member "Golos" awarded 2017 Democracy Defender Award in Vienna". European Platform for Democratic Elections.
  117. "Denmark and OSCE-partner countries honours Human Rights Centre ZMINA and Memorial Human Rights Centre with 2022 Democracy Defender Award". Retrieved 7 September 2023.
  118. "On the 2020 Democracy Defender Award". U.S. Mission to the OSCE. 12 March 2020. Archived from the original on 1 May 2021. Retrieved 24 February 2021.
  119. "2019 Democracy Defender Award Seminar and Presentation". U.S. Mission to the OSCE. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  120. "Serbia's 'CRTA' Receives the 2018 Democracy Defender Award | USOSCE". U.S. Mission to the OSCE. 19 March 2018. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  121. "Democracy Defender Award" till engagemang för demokratisk utveckling i Serbien". Sweden Abroad. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  122. "Democracy Defenders Award". OSCE mission in Denmark. Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2017.

Further reading

External links

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
Members
Partners for
Cooperation
Bodies and posts
Relations
Active field missions
Former field missions
Europe articles
History
Chronology
By topic
Geography
Politics
Intergovernmental
European Union
Economy
Intergovernmental
Sovereign states by
Society
Culture
Demographics
Election and democracy support/reform organizations
Internationally focused NGOs
Intergovernmental organizations
Governmental/
government-funded organizations
Country focused NGOs
Regional organizations
Bodies
Topics
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)
"Participants" (11)
1991 agreements parties and "participants" (11)
Additionally the 1993 CIS Charter parties and "members" (9)
Self-proclaimed "associate member" as defined in the CIS Charter (1)
1991 agreements parties that do not participate in the summits (2)
Former "participant" that renounced 1991 agreements and 1993 Charter (1)
Sports
Military
Economics
Organization
Outside the CIS framework
Eastern Bloc
Formation
Soviet-allied states
Organizations
Revolts and
opposition
Conditions
Dissolution
Categories: