Misplaced Pages

User talk:JMarkievicz2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:41, 24 March 2022 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:58, 1 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
Line 25: Line 25:


====]== ====]==
I feel that the matter of {{User|Bluemarine}} and ] now requires the involvement of the Arbitration Committee. Given recent involvement in the matter, I have listed you as a party to the case. <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 04:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC) I feel that the matter of {{User|Bluemarine}} and ] now requires the involvement of the Arbitration Committee. Given recent involvement in the matter, I have listed you as a party to the case. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">]]</span> 04:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


==]== ==]==
Line 34: Line 34:
== (fold) == == (fold) ==


I'm tossing in my hand on the RFAr. The block on Sanchez was it. I've expended a great deal of effort on that article, but to have him do something as manifestly stupid as to violate his clearly and narrowly tailored unblock to wade into the waterboarding debate during an arbitration case cannot be justified, defended, or excused. I will continue to watch the RFAr, and will respond if appropriate, but I will not be adding any more to it. ''']''' <small>]</small> 14:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC) I'm tossing in my hand on the RFAr. The block on Sanchez was it. I've expended a great deal of effort on that article, but to have him do something as manifestly stupid as to violate his clearly and narrowly tailored unblock to wade into the waterboarding debate during an arbitration case cannot be justified, defended, or excused. I will continue to watch the RFAr, and will respond if appropriate, but I will not be adding any more to it. ''']''' <small>]</small> 14:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


== ] == == ] ==

Latest revision as of 13:58, 1 May 2022

Welcome!

Hello, JMarkievicz2, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Elonka 09:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Matt Sanchez

I just wanted to say thank you very much for the research that you've been doing on the Sanchez videos. I've found the information very interesting and enlightening, and I'd definitely like to figure out some way of including at least some of the data in the bio.  :) --Elonka 09:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Request for comment on Request for Comment

Hello, may I ask for your support in getting an RFC established for user Bluemarine/Matt Sanchez? Here are the guidelines. Here is the RFC/User page. It takes at least two to get it started and hopefully this will get some more or renewed attention from editors not currently involved in the discussion.

Yeah, I could support that. What do I do? JMarkievicz2 06:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
here's an example of another request for comment that's been completed.
This is the Bluemarine RFC. Right now it's just a skeleton. Basically you just add your own experience and link to examples of problematic behavior. Thanks for your help. Typing monkey 08:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Urgent request-Comment on Article for Deletion

Hi there - Thank you for your participation in the Bluemarine request for comment. On a related, but broader note, I thought perhaps you'd like to comment on the proposed deletion of a proposed "Dubious Sources" category? This isn't discussed as it should be within Misplaced Pages, in my opinion.Typing Monkey - 03:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

==Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Matt_Sanchez

I feel that the matter of Bluemarine (talk · contribs) and Matt Sanchez now requires the involvement of the Arbitration Committee. Given recent involvement in the matter, I have listed you as a party to the case. WjBscribe 04:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, John Vandenberg (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

(fold)

I'm tossing in my hand on the RFAr. The block on Sanchez was it. I've expended a great deal of effort on that article, but to have him do something as manifestly stupid as to violate his clearly and narrowly tailored unblock to wade into the waterboarding debate during an arbitration case cannot be justified, defended, or excused. I will continue to watch the RFAr, and will respond if appropriate, but I will not be adding any more to it. Horologium (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The indefinite community ban of Bluemarine (talk · contribs) is still in effect, with an Arbitration Committee ban now running concurrently for one year, at which point the community may consider unbanning the user. As a result of the violations of our Biographies of Living People policy that have occurred on the article Matt Sanchez, it has been placed on article probation, which requires that editors be especially mindful of content and interaction policies. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_Bluemarine

Hi, I've initiated a request for amendment in an arbitration case where you were a named party. You may wish to comment. Best regards, Durova 06:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine motion passed

The Committee's decision in this case and the preexisting community ban of Bluemarine (talk · contribs) are modified solely to the extent that Bluemarine is unblocked for the limited purpose of his making contributions related to increasing the accessibility of Misplaced Pages to users with handicapping conditions. This includes uploading encyclopedic audio files, formatting audio file templates, and captioning those audio files, as well as editing his userpage and talkpage, all under the mentorship of Durova (talk · contribs). Except as expressly provided in this motion, the ban on editing by Bluemarine remains in effect. If Bluemarine violates the terms of his limited unblock, or makes any comment reasonably regarded as harassing or a personal attack, he may be reblocked for an appropriate period of time by any uninvolved administrator. If Bluemarine complies with these conditions for a period of 60 days, a request for further modification of his ban may be submitted.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Daniel (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)