Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish bankers: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:31, 29 March 2022 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:36, 26 April 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors373,261 editsm Fix Linter errors. More needed. Leaving font tags for bots. 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
non-encyclopedic listcruft with little hope of ever becoming comprehensive or maintanable → ] {<font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sup>]</sup></font><font face="arial, helvetica">ł</font><font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sub>]</sub></font>} 12:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC) non-encyclopedic listcruft with little hope of ever becoming comprehensive or maintanable → ] {<font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sup>]</sup></font><font face="arial, helvetica">ł</font><font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sub>]</sub></font>} 12:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete or speedy delete''': This isn't just a case of lack of comprehensiveness. This is another one of those "let's list the Jews" things that ''certain people'' are forever engaging in. Of evil intent, evil effect, and misbegotten impetus. ] 13:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete or speedy delete''': This isn't just a case of lack of comprehensiveness. This is another one of those "let's list the Jews" things that ''certain people'' are forever engaging in. Of evil intent, evil effect, and misbegotten impetus. ] 13:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Should not breakdown lists by category generally ] ] 14:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC) * '''Delete''' Should not breakdown lists by category generally ] ] 14:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. --]<sup><small>( ] | ])</small></sup> 14:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. --]<sup><small>( ] | ])</small></sup> 14:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' - ill-intended ] 14:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC) * '''Delete''' - ill-intended ] 14:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' listcruft with malicious intent. --] 14:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' listcruft with malicious intent. --] 14:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to ]</i> '''Delete''' as conspiracycruft, possibly with malicious intent. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 14:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Redirect''' to ] '''Delete''' as conspiracycruft, possibly with malicious intent. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 14:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', listcruft. —] 15:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''', listcruft. —] 15:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' ] 15:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' ] 15:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Line 20: Line 20:
****It's already been tried: ]. The verdict was "keep". &mdash; ] <small>]</small> 18:21, 13 November 2005 (UTC) ****It's already been tried: ]. The verdict was "keep". &mdash; ] <small>]</small> 18:21, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The logical conclusion of this practice is ] and ]. ] 16:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. The logical conclusion of this practice is ] and ]. ] 16:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
**I should get started on ], then. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 16:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC) **I should get started on ], then. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 16:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
***Better not create ]. Unemployed people are unlikely to deserve an article, and listing non-existing articles which will never be created (or cannot be created) is cause for deletion. - ]|] 09:48, 14 November 2005 (UTC) ***Better not create ]. Unemployed people are unlikely to deserve an article, and listing non-existing articles which will never be created (or cannot be created) is cause for deletion. - ]|] 09:48, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
****Well, thank you for that advice. In return, might I interest you in a slice of ]? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 15:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC) ****Well, thank you for that advice. In return, might I interest you in a slice of ]? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 15:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', per above arguments. ] 17:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''', per above arguments. ] 17:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*<s>'''Delete''' &mdash; Inconsequential list. &mdash; ] 17:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)</s> *<s>'''Delete''' &mdash; Inconsequential list. &mdash; ] 17:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)</s>
Line 35: Line 35:
*'''Delete''' per Durova ] | ] 23:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per Durova ] | ] 23:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. File under "who cares?" listcruft. Impossible maintain and could potentially have thousands of entries, most of whom would be relinked. I'd give careful consideration to the lists under ] too, the concept of which I find vaguely offensive. (I know it survived an AFD, but I think it should be revisited). If someone really wants to pigeonhole people by their religion, there are categories for that sort of thing. ] 04:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. File under "who cares?" listcruft. Impossible maintain and could potentially have thousands of entries, most of whom would be relinked. I'd give careful consideration to the lists under ] too, the concept of which I find vaguely offensive. (I know it survived an AFD, but I think it should be revisited). If someone really wants to pigeonhole people by their religion, there are categories for that sort of thing. ] 04:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. This makes as much sense as a ], or a ]. ] (] <small>], ], ], <font color=green>]</font> ]</small>) 07:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. This makes as much sense as a ], or a ]. ] (] <small>], ], ], ] ]</small>) 07:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. But someone's gotta make ]. - ] ] 08:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. But someone's gotta make ]. - ] ] 08:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. While all you politically-correct sheep are jumping off a cliff, trying to outdo one another (without actually having visited the main-page list), you failed to realize that this was but one of a series of lists of Jewish notables. It appears to be maintained by Jews and is well-organized, and the persons in the list are "bankers of notabiliy," such as founders of historic firms like Salomon, and most from the 1800's. If it were a conspiracy list, wouldn't it be targeting present-day bankers? So, you sheep can go jump off a cliff, having voted prejudicially without first investigating the case.] 09:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. While all you politically-correct sheep are jumping off a cliff, trying to outdo one another (without actually having visited the main-page list), you failed to realize that this was but one of a series of lists of Jewish notables. It appears to be maintained by Jews and is well-organized, and the persons in the list are "bankers of notabiliy," such as founders of historic firms like Salomon, and most from the 1800's. If it were a conspiracy list, wouldn't it be targeting present-day bankers? So, you sheep can go jump off a cliff, having voted prejudicially without first investigating the case.] 09:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:36, 26 April 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (75% delete from 30 votes, and 10 keep votes). - Mailer Diablo 01:50, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

List of Jewish bankers

non-encyclopedic listcruft with little hope of ever becoming comprehensive or maintanable → Ξxtreme Unction {łblah} 12:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Just proving my point, someone (Arniep) nominated a whole "list of" Jewish. Not surprisingly, the "List of Jewish Criminals" is going down in flames, while most of the rest are "speedy keep." In fact, one person who voted against "List of Jewish Bankers" voted FOR some of the other lists. This merely proves my point that reactionary politically-correct bias is operating here...I'm sure a court of law would find that since these lists were created by the same user, who has shown an intent not of anti-Semitism but Jewish identity (being Jewish), taken as a whole the lists should be equal. Remember, DISCRIMINATION is picking out one thing and applying different standards.Ryoung122 09:36, 18 November 2005 (UTC)


List of Jewish American academics List of Jewish American business figures List of Jewish American political figures List of Jewish American scientists List of Jewish American show business figures List of Jewish American sport figures List of Jewish American writers List of Jewish Americans List of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society List of Jewish Members of the National Academy of Engineering List of Jewish Recipients of National Medal of Technology List of Jewish bankers List of Jewish criminals List of Jewish publishers List of Jews List of Jews in business List of Jews in law

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.