| Revision as of 16:00, 29 April 2022 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,134,948 edits →User script to detect unreliable sources: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:19, 8 October 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,268 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Talk header|wp=yes|WT:WPBF |
{{Talk header|wp=yes|WT:WPBF}} | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell| | |||
| {{WikiProject Bahá'í Faith}} | {{WikiProject Bahá'í Faith}} | ||
| ⚫ | }} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| | algo = old(60d) | | algo = old(60d) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
| {{Archive box|auto=yes}} | {{Archive box|auto=yes}} | ||
| == Featured article review: Baháʼí Faith == | |||
| == Missing/broken references == | |||
| I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 15:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| I'm trying to make a dent in ], and a few articles related to the Baha'i faith have issues that I can't fix. Basically, some refs linked via {{tl|sfn}} and {{tl|harvnb}} and similar have missing full citations or have some other problems. You can check ] to have error messages enabled (Svick's script is the simplest to use, but Trappist's script is a bit more refined if you're interested in doing deeper cleanup). | |||
| {{columns-list|colwidth=30em| | |||
| #<s>]</s> | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #<s>]</s> | |||
| #] | |||
| #<s>]</s> | |||
| #<s>]</s> | |||
| #<s>]</s> | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #<s>]</s> | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| ⚫ | }} | ||
| The cause is often copy-pasting a short reference from another article without copy-pasting the full reference. If you can find where things were copy-pasted from, you can usually find what the full reference is. | |||
| Thanks for any help you can give!  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 13:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks. Occasional cross editing where people delete something else also happens. What a mess. But thanks for helping and pointing things out. ] (]) 13:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :There's very likely more, but those were pretty easy to spot as being of interest to this project.  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 13:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Also reminds me that many ''Baha'i News'' references are smei-broken - they've been posted more than once in lots of places but a few later dropped them while later ones consciously went about cleaning up scans. I went around for a while at least deleting the dead urls for a while and in a few cases fix urls when new ones came along. But there is much yet to be done. But I don't know a simple way to gather the list of such in one place. ] (]) 14:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC on ecclesiastical titles == | |||
| There is a proposal for a ] being conducted at ]. Interested editors are encouraged to participate. It is a bit Christian-centric as currently written, so the opinions of those with knowledge of other religions is especially welcome. --] (]) 02:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Baháʼí Faith veiw on Joseph Smith == | |||
| Joseph Smith is considered by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to be a prophet. Bahá’ís do not regard him as such. He is not considered by Bahá’ís to be a prophet, minor or otherwise. He is considered to be a "religious teacher sensitive to the spiritual currents flowing in the early 19th century directly from the appearance of the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh and the Revelation of their Messages of hope and Divine Guidance." (Lights of Guidance, p. 511) | |||
| Joseph Smith could be mentioned on the ] page or given a similar page title "Baháʼí Faith veiw on Joseph Smith." ] (]) 06:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ~ ] (], ] | ], ]) 08:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ==Help with picture== | |||
| Hello and greetings from the Basque country. | |||
| I am translating the article of the Bab into euskara and I see that the link to the picture of the room in Shiraz does not appear in the translated article. Could you help me? Thanks in advance. | |||
| ] | |||
| The page which had been ] was unsuccessfully proposed for a change to ], then successfully changed to ], and is now being proposed for a change to ]. Your input and expertise would be most welcome at: | |||
| :The only images that can work across languages go on Wikimedia Commons, but the licensing requirements are more difficult. Copyrighted material, like this image, goes on the English Misplaced Pages and won't cross over to euskara. You may be able to upload the image to the other wiki and use it there. is the copyrighted source of that image, along with many others, and is the copyright notice you'll need to upload. ] ☼ - ] 19:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ] Best, ]] 00:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Project-independent quality assessments == | |||
| == User script to detect unreliable sources == | |||
| Quality assessments are used by Misplaced Pages editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at ], but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent ] was approved and has been implemented to add a {{para|class}} parameter to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. | |||
| {{Main|User:Headbomb/unreliable}} | |||
| I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to ] and ]s. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the ]. The idea is that it takes something like | |||
| *John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. (<code><nowiki>John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.</nowiki></code>) | |||
| and turns it into something like | |||
| * John Smith "{{highlight||pink}}" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. | |||
| No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. | |||
| It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{tl|cite web}}, {{tl|cite journal}} and {{tl|doi}}. | |||
| However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} a new {{para|QUALITY_CRITERIA|custom}} parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. ] (]) 20:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| The script is mostly based on ], ] and ] and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed. | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Do note that this is '''not a script to be mindlessly used''', and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at ]. Questions, comments and requests can be made at ]. | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] ] 10:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for help with ] == | |||
| -  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> | |||
| This article has gone through many lives since it was created in 2006, and it was recently totally rewritten (in a very non-wikipedia kind of way) on 20 March 2024. I've started to try to wiki-fy it but haven't gotten very far as I've started to question the existence of the page at all, or at least the name of the page. I have two comments on the talk page with more thoughts, one of which has some possible names that could be more clear (ex. '''Golden Age (Baháʼí)''' and '''Baháʼí views on government''' for two) but would really appreciate some more input as I'm a fairly new editor and not an expert on the Baháʼí faith. ] (]) 19:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: ] (]) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 12:19, 8 October 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Bahá'í Faith and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Featured article review: Baháʼí Faith
I have nominated Baháʼí Faith for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nutez (talk) 15:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:The Buddha
The page which had been Gautama Buddha was unsuccessfully proposed for a change to Siddhartha Gautama, then successfully changed to The Buddha, and is now being proposed for a change to Buddha. Your input and expertise would be most welcome at: Talk:The_Buddha#Requested_move_25_November_2022 Best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments are used by Misplaced Pages editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Isaac
Isaac has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 10:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Request for help with New world order (Baháʼí)
This article has gone through many lives since it was created in 2006, and it was recently totally rewritten (in a very non-wikipedia kind of way) on 20 March 2024. I've started to try to wiki-fy it but haven't gotten very far as I've started to question the existence of the page at all, or at least the name of the page. I have two comments on the talk page with more thoughts, one of which has some possible names that could be more clear (ex. Golden Age (Baháʼí) and Baháʼí views on government for two) but would really appreciate some more input as I'm a fairly new editor and not an expert on the Baháʼí faith. Underswamp (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories: