Misplaced Pages

Talk:American Life League: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:51, 6 May 2022 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Byzic0n - ""← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:03, 20 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,801,449 editsm →top: Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings: -Start, keep BTag: AWB 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Organizations|class=Start|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Organizations|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject United States|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=Start|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Catholicism|class=Start|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Catholicism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Abortion|class=B}} {{WikiProject Abortion}}
}} }}


Line 32: Line 32:


:Well, actually, the Disney boycott thing ''is'' sourced, to Snopes.com (the links following each film name). But maybe what you meant is that you don't consider snopes.com a ]; if that's the case, we can use the ''Washington Post'' instead (). Either way, the Disney boycott should be included since it's one of the actually ] things about this group. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC) :Well, actually, the Disney boycott thing ''is'' sourced, to Snopes.com (the links following each film name). But maybe what you meant is that you don't consider snopes.com a ]; if that's the case, we can use the ''Washington Post'' instead (). Either way, the Disney boycott should be included since it's one of the actually ] things about this group. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

::Thanks for the clarification here. That was obviously my mistake. I wasn't trying to hide information in any way. I just overlooked the source. Sorry. In the end, I think the ''Post'' is definitely a more reliable source and helps give the article more weight. ] 00:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC) ::Thanks for the clarification here. That was obviously my mistake. I wasn't trying to hide information in any way. I just overlooked the source. Sorry. In the end, I think the ''Post'' is definitely a more reliable source and helps give the article more weight. ] 00:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

:::Cool... sounds good to me. Feel free to edit my paraphrase of the Washington Post article. I wasn't meaning to accuse you of anything; apologies if it came across that way. Anyhoo, the Post is definitely better than snopes.com as a source, so it works out. Welcome again to Misplaced Pages. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 01:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC) :::Cool... sounds good to me. Feel free to edit my paraphrase of the Washington Post article. I wasn't meaning to accuse you of anything; apologies if it came across that way. Anyhoo, the Post is definitely better than snopes.com as a source, so it works out. Welcome again to Misplaced Pages. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 01:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


Line 82: Line 80:


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 18:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC) Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 18:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

== Reversion ==


On the American Life League page, I removed two programs that are no longer active (they haven't been for years) and replaced them with two programs that are currently active. The editor reverted the edit -- why? The reversion now has old information because of it. On the American Life League page, I removed two programs that are no longer active (they haven't been for years) and replaced them with two programs that are currently active. The editor reverted the edit -- why? The reversion now has old information because of it.
Line 90: Line 90:


Byzic0n <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Byzic0n <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:My edit summary explains why; you should read those policies to which I linked. ---''']]''' 04:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
:Also, by your edit summaries: "We are primarily education and have dedicated library and resources sections on our website in order to teach people about being pro-life" you sound like you are a member of this organization; if so, you should not be editing this article directly, but only making requests here on the Talk page since you have a conflict of interest ]. ---''']]''' 04:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
::Completely agree with the reversion done by {{u|Avatar317}}; I would have reverted this edit too if I had seen it first. For starters Byzic0n, you don't get to remove referenced information from Misplaced Pages just because the programs are no longer active. All referenced history should be included (as long as it adheres to ], ] and other guidelines of course). ] (]) 07:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:03, 20 November 2024

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconOrganizations Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconConservatism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCatholicism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconAmerican Life League is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconAbortion
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Concerning the international prespective of ALL's attacks on Bill Gates and others

The views of ALL, such as attacks on Bill Gates and criticisms of British Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, are seen as bizarrely extreme by observers outside the USA.

I removed the above section, which was added by User:Hardcoredemocrat, because if you think about Bill Gates donating money to charities in Africa that promote contraception, it is completely logical. Also it doesn't site a source for the observations of those outside the USA, only ALL's attacks. AND even if it did cite a source there is no need for use of words "extremely bizarre" (for that is what he meant I hope), which seem overly dramatic. Chooserr 23:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Missing Sources

I removed this paragraph from the Controversy section. It's a bald assertion with no source.

American Life League is often controversial, and has been accused of being and divisive within the larger pro-life community. Of particular interest is separate, and often competing events during the weekend of the annual March for Life. In fact, American Life League was formed after Judie Brown disputed with other members of the National Right to Life Organization. Furthermore, ALL often runs advertisements in national newspapers campaigning for policy change and against certain bishops of the Catholic Church.

Even with a source, part of this seems to go against the WP:NPOV standard.

Andrew Flusche 04:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I removed this paragraph. No source.

ALL was also involved in boycotts of the Disney films in the early 90s, most notably Aladdin , The Little Mermaid , and The Lion King , for what it perceived to be "subliminal sex messages" placed within the films.

Also, the final words seem to violate the WP:NPOV standard - "what it perceived to be," then putting subliminal sex messages in quotes. Perhaps it would be more neutral to say, "for what the group claimed were subliminal sex messages placed within the films."

Andrew Flusche 04:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, actually, the Disney boycott thing is sourced, to Snopes.com (the links following each film name). But maybe what you meant is that you don't consider snopes.com a reliable source; if that's the case, we can use the Washington Post instead ("Group Sees Dirt In Dust"). Either way, the Disney boycott should be included since it's one of the actually notable (in the Misplaced Pages sense) things about this group. MastCell 22:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification here. That was obviously my mistake. I wasn't trying to hide information in any way. I just overlooked the source. Sorry. In the end, I think the Post is definitely a more reliable source and helps give the article more weight. Andrew Flusche 00:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Cool... sounds good to me. Feel free to edit my paraphrase of the Washington Post article. I wasn't meaning to accuse you of anything; apologies if it came across that way. Anyhoo, the Post is definitely better than snopes.com as a source, so it works out. Welcome again to Misplaced Pages. MastCell 01:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Sources.

Can't we find less biased sources than the groups "People For the American Way" and "Center for Media and Democracy", which both have a strong leftist slant, particularly on this issue? Sion 01:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on American Life League. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 23:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on American Life League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on American Life League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Reversion

On the American Life League page, I removed two programs that are no longer active (they haven't been for years) and replaced them with two programs that are currently active. The editor reverted the edit -- why? The reversion now has old information because of it.

Additionally, I updated a section linking to Charity Navigator referencing 2012 information with more updated information, linking to the same Charity Navigator but in 2019, and the editor reverted that edit too. Why?

There was also a "citation needed" regarding the location the of the organization, so I provided a citation link to their contact page containing their address, phone number, etc and that was reverted. Why?

Byzic0n — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byzic0n (talk • contribs) 01:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

My edit summary explains why; you should read those policies to which I linked. ---Avatar317 04:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Also, by your edit summaries: "We are primarily education and have dedicated library and resources sections on our website in order to teach people about being pro-life" you sound like you are a member of this organization; if so, you should not be editing this article directly, but only making requests here on the Talk page since you have a conflict of interest WP:COI. ---Avatar317 04:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Completely agree with the reversion done by Avatar317; I would have reverted this edit too if I had seen it first. For starters Byzic0n, you don't get to remove referenced information from Misplaced Pages just because the programs are no longer active. All referenced history should be included (as long as it adheres to WP:RS, WP:UNDUE and other guidelines of course). Damien Linnane (talk) 07:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Categories: