Misplaced Pages

Thomas More Society: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:01, 9 June 2022 edit72.74.27.126 (talk)No edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:37, 12 October 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,415,340 edits Add: date, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Spinixster | Category:Organizations that oppose LGBTQ rights in the United States | #UCB_Category 75/101 
(56 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Conservative pro-life American law firm based in Chicago}} {{short description|Conservative anti-abortion American law firm based in Chicago}}
⚫ {{Use mdy dates|date=May 2022}}
{{About|the national law firm based in Chicago, Illinois|the law firm in Ann Arbor, Michigan|Thomas More Law Center}} {{About|the national law firm based in Chicago, Illinois|the law firm in Ann Arbor, Michigan|Thomas More Law Center}}
⚫ {{Use mdy dates|date=May 2022}}
The '''Thomas More Society''' is a conservative<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2016/01/frozen_embryos_and_the_anti_abortion_activists_who_love_them.html |title=Frozen embryos and the anti-abortion activists who love them |first=Christina |last=Cauterucci |date=January 28, 2016 |work=] |accessdate=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/20/us/anti-abortion-groups-join-battles-over-frozen-embryos.html |title=Anti-Abortion Groups Join Battles Over Frozen Embryos |date=January 20, 2016 |work=] |accessdate=February 4, 2016 |quote=Thomas Olp, of the Thomas More Society, a conservative law firm that filed the brief in concert with Missouri Right to Life and other anti-abortion groups, said...}}</ref> ] ] based in ].<ref name=Huppke>{{cite web|authors=Rex W. Huppke|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2013-10-06-ct-met-thomas-more-anniversary-20131007-story.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809121309/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2013-10-06-ct-met-thomas-more-anniversary-20131007-story.html|archivedate=August 9, 2020|title=Thomas More Society celebrates 15 years on the front line of the culture wars |work=] |date=2013 |accessdate=February 4, 2016}}</ref> Founded in 1997, the group has been engaged in many "]" issues, promoting its ] and ] beliefs through litigation.<ref name="Huppke" /> The society filed cases as part of Donald Trump's ], in which Trump was defeated.<ref name="TietoEllis">Jon Swaine, Rosalind S. Helderman, Josh Dawsey and Tom Hamburger, , ''Washington Post'' (December 7, 2020).</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Rutenberg|first=Jim|last2=Becker|first2=Jo|last3=Lipton|first3=Eric|last4=Haberman|first4=Maggie|last5=Martin|first5=Jonathan|last6=Rosenberg|first6=Matthew|last7=Schmidt|first7=Michael S.|date=January 31, 2021|title=77 Days: Trump's Campaign to Subvert the Election|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/31/us/trump-election-lie.html|access-date=February 1, 2021|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> The '''Thomas More Society''' is a conservative<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2016/01/frozen_embryos_and_the_anti_abortion_activists_who_love_them.html |title=Frozen embryos and the anti-abortion activists who love them |first=Christina |last=Cauterucci |date=January 28, 2016 |work=] |access-date=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/20/us/anti-abortion-groups-join-battles-over-frozen-embryos.html |title=Anti-Abortion Groups Join Battles Over Frozen Embryos |date=January 20, 2016 |work=] |access-date=February 4, 2016 |quote=Thomas Olp, of the Thomas More Society, a conservative law firm that filed the brief in concert with Missouri Right to Life and other anti-abortion groups, said...}}</ref> ]<ref name="Joshua C. Wilson 2020 p. 128">] & Joshua C. Wilson, ''Separate But Faithful: The Christian Right's Radical Struggle to Transform Law & Legal Culture'' (Oxford University Press, 2020), p. 128: "the Chicago-based Thomas More Society (TMS), a different conservative Catholic PILO"</ref><ref>Eugene Volokh, , ], ''Washington Post'' (March 9, 2015): "the Thomas More Society would generally be seen as a conservative Catholic public interest law firm"</ref> ] ] based in ].<ref name="Huppke">{{cite web |author=Rex W. Huppke |date=2013 |title=Thomas More Society celebrates 15 years on the front line of the culture wars |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2013-10-06-ct-met-thomas-more-anniversary-20131007-story.htm |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809121309/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2013-10-06-ct-met-thomas-more-anniversary-20131007-story.html |archive-date=August 9, 2020 |access-date=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref name="Joshua C. Wilson 2020 p. 128"/> The group has been engaged in many "]" issues, promoting its ] and ] beliefs through litigation.<ref name="Huppke" /> The society filed cases as part of Donald Trump's ], in which Trump was defeated.<ref name="TietoEllis">Jon Swaine, Rosalind S. Helderman, Josh Dawsey and Tom Hamburger, , ''Washington Post'' (December 7, 2020).</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last1=Rutenberg|first1=Jim|last2=Becker|first2=Jo|last3=Lipton|first3=Eric|last4=Haberman|first4=Maggie|last5=Martin|first5=Jonathan|last6=Rosenberg|first6=Matthew|last7=Schmidt|first7=Michael S.|date=January 31, 2021|title=77 Days: Trump's Campaign to Subvert the Election|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/31/us/trump-election-lie.html|access-date=February 1, 2021|issn=0362-4331}}</ref>

⚫ ==History and ideology==
Founded by Tom Brejcha in 1997, the group won two U.S. Supreme Court victories against the ] in ''Scheidler v. National Organization for Women'' in ] and ].<ref name=Huppke/> Brejcha is the president and chief counsel of the group.<ref name=BouboushianNix>Jack Bouboushian, , Courthouse News Service (September 18, 2013).</ref> The Thomas More Society has been engaged in many "]" issues, promoting its ] and ] beliefs through litigation.<ref name=Huppke/>

The Thomas More Society is one of a broader set of Christian conservative legal organizations (CCLOs),<ref name=Huppke/><ref name=Farrell>Henry Farrell, , ''Washington Post'' (December 5, 2017).</ref> which include ], ], ], ], ], National Legal Foundation, ], and ].<ref name=Farrell/>

==Organization==
The Thomas More Society received ] tax-exempt status in November 1999.<ref name=ProPublica>, ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer.</ref> On its 2022 ], it reported revenue of $13.4 million and expenses of $16.3 million.<ref name=ProPublica/>


The society is listed on the ]' "Directory of Lay Movements, Organizations, and Professional Associations" as a National Catholic Association.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Directory of Lay Movements, Organizations, and Professional Associations|url=https://www.usccb.org/committees/laity-marriage-family-life-youth/directory-lay-movements-organizations-and-professional |access-date=2022-07-30 |publisher=United States Conference of Catholic Bishops|language=en}}</ref>
⚫ ==History and litigation==
The Thomas More Society is a faithfully Catholic law firm.<ref>] & Joshua C. Wilson, ''Separate But Faithful: The Christian Right's Radical Struggle to Transform Law & Legal Culture'' (Oxford University Press, 2020), p. 128: "the Chicago-based Thomas More Society (TMS), a different conservative Catholic PILO"</ref><ref>Eugene Volokh, , ], ''Washington Post'' (March 9, 2015): "the Thomas More Society would generally be seen as a conservative Catholic public interest law firm"</ref> Founded by Tom Brejcha in 1997, the group won two U.S. Supreme Court victories against the ] in ''Scheidler v. National Organization for Women'' in ] and ].<ref name=Huppke/> Brejcha is the president and chief counsel of the group.<ref name=BouboushianNix>Jack Bouboushian, , Courthouse News Service (September 18, 2013).</ref> The Thomas More Society has been engaged in many "]" issues, promoting its pro-life and pro-traditional-marriage beliefs through litigation.<ref name=Huppke/> It is part of a broader set of Christian conservative legal organizations (CCLOs),<ref name=Huppke/><ref name=Farrell>Henry Farrell, , ''Washington Post'' (December 5, 2017).</ref> which include ], ], ], ], ], National Legal Foundation, ], and ].<ref name=Farrell/>


==Litigation==
===Abortion, contraception, and embryo cases===
===Reproduction issues===
In partnership with the ], the Thomas More Society has challenged the constitutionality of the ]'s ].<ref name=BouboushianNix/><ref>Jennifer S. Mann, , ] (September 9, 2014).</ref> In partnership with the ], the Thomas More Society has challenged the constitutionality of the ]'s ].<ref name=BouboushianNix/><ref>Jennifer S. Mann, , ] (September 9, 2014).</ref>


In 2015, the Thomas More Society filed ]s in the civil case of actress ], who was sued by her ex-boyfriend in an frozen ] case; the society, along with other pro-life groups, sought to have the courts treat the embryo as children (under a "best interests of the child" standard) rather than as ]. The case tied into a broader "personhood" debate that had emerged in the debate over abortion.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/20/us/anti-abortion-groups-join-battles-over-frozen-embryos.html |title=Anti-Abortion Groups Join Battles Over Frozen Embryos |date=January 20, 2016 |work=] |accessdate=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/2016/01/20/the_new_anti_choice_mission_target_frozen_embryos_to_make_it_harder_for_couples_like_sofia_vergara_and_nick_loeb_to_break_up/ |title=The new anti-choice mission: Target frozen embryos to make it harder for couples like Sofia Vergara and Nick Loeb to break up |first=Amanda |last=Marcotte |date=January 20, 2016 |work=] |accessdate=February 4, 2016}}</ref> In 2015, the Thomas More Society filed ]s in the civil case of actress ], who was sued by her ex-boyfriend in a frozen ] case; the society, along with other anti-abortion groups, sought to have the courts treat the embryo as children (under a "best interests of the child" standard) rather than as ]. The case tied into a broader "personhood" debate that had emerged in the politics of abortion.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/20/us/anti-abortion-groups-join-battles-over-frozen-embryos.html |title=Anti-Abortion Groups Join Battles Over Frozen Embryos |date=January 20, 2016 |work=] |access-date=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/2016/01/20/the_new_anti_choice_mission_target_frozen_embryos_to_make_it_harder_for_couples_like_sofia_vergara_and_nick_loeb_to_break_up/ |title=The new anti-choice mission: Target frozen embryos to make it harder for couples like Sofia Vergara and Nick Loeb to break up |first=Amanda |last=Marcotte |date=January 20, 2016 |work=] |access-date=February 4, 2016}}</ref>


In 2016, the Thomas More Society represented pro-life activist ], of California, pro bono.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ocweekly.com/news/david-daleiden-unveils-new-abortion-sting-video-on-eve-of-texas-court-date-6948638 |title=Irvine Anti-Abortion Activist Unveils New Abortion Sting Video on Eve of Court Date |first=Matt |last=Coker |work=] |accessdate=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ocweekly.com/news/david-daleiden-of-irvine-based-anti-abortion-group-is-indicted-in-texas-6927066 |title=Planned Parenthood Hit Videographers Indicted in Texas |first=Matt |last=Coker |work=] |accessdate=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vice.com/read/what-we-know-about-the-charges-against-the-anti-abortion-hidden-camera-activists |title=What We Know About the Charges Against the Pro-Life Hidden Camera Activists |date=January 26, 2016 |first=Mike |last=Pearl |work=] |accessdate=February 4, 2016}}</ref> In 2016, the Thomas More Society represented anti-abortion activist ], of California, pro bono.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ocweekly.com/news/david-daleiden-unveils-new-abortion-sting-video-on-eve-of-texas-court-date-6948638 |title=Irvine Anti-Abortion Activist Unveils New Abortion Sting Video on Eve of Court Date |first=Matt |last=Coker |work=] |date=February 4, 2016 |access-date=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ocweekly.com/news/david-daleiden-of-irvine-based-anti-abortion-group-is-indicted-in-texas-6927066 |title=Planned Parenthood Hit Videographers Indicted in Texas |first=Matt |last=Coker |work=] |date=January 27, 2016 |access-date=February 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vice.com/read/what-we-know-about-the-charges-against-the-anti-abortion-hidden-camera-activists |title=What We Know About the Charges Against the Pro-Life Hidden Camera Activists |date=January 26, 2016 |first=Mike |last=Pearl |work=] |access-date=February 4, 2016}}</ref>


In 2018, the Executive Council of Iowa, which included Republican Governor ], hired the Thomas More Society to defend ] in a legal challenge against ], the strictest in the nation.<ref>, Associated Press (May 21, 2018).</ref> The group stepped in to represent the state after ] ], a Democrat, declined to defend the law's constitutionality.<ref>Rox Laird, , Courthouse News Service (September 6, 2018).</ref> The group represented the state without a fee.<ref name=Pitt>David Pitt, , Associated Press (June 1, 2018).</ref> A state court blocked the Iowa law from going into effect.<ref name=Pitt/> In 2018, the Executive Council of Iowa, which included Republican Governor ], hired the Thomas More Society to defend ] in a legal challenge against ], the strictest in the nation.<ref>, Associated Press (May 21, 2018).</ref> The group stepped in to represent the state after ] ], a Democrat, declined to defend the law's constitutionality.<ref>Rox Laird, , Courthouse News Service (September 6, 2018).</ref> The group represented the state without a fee.<ref name=Pitt>David Pitt, , Associated Press (June 1, 2018).</ref> A state court blocked the Iowa law from going into effect.<ref name=Pitt/>

In 2023 the Thomas More Society joined in representing a Texas man in a suit against his ex-wife's associates. The plaintiff alleges they aided the ex-wife in obtaining the drugs for medical abortion. Asserting that assisting a self-managed abortion is murder, the suit was brought pursuant to wrongful death statutes rather than the ] ("S.B.&nbsp;8"), the anti-abortion vigilante act.<ref name="Slate2023-3-15">{{Cite news |last1=Lithwick |first1=Dahlia |last2=Stern |first2=Mark Joseph |author-link1=Dahlia Lithwick |date=March 15, 2023 |title=Sued for Offering Friendship |language=en-US |work=] |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/03/texas-lawsuit-suing-friends-explained.html |access-date=2023-03-15 |issn=1091-2339}}</ref><ref name="TexTrib2023-3-10">{{Cite news |last=Klibanoff |first=Eleanor |date=March 10, 2023 |title=Three Texas women are sued for wrongful death after allegedly helping friend obtain abortion medication |url=https://www.texastribune.org/2023/03/10/texas-abortion-lawsuit/ |access-date=2023-03-15 |work=] |language=en}}</ref><ref name="TMS2023-3-11">{{Cite press release |date=March 11, 2023 |title=Father of Aborted Unborn Child Brings Wrongful-Death Lawsuit |url=https://thomasmoresociety.org/father-of-aborted-unborn-child-brings-wrongful-death-lawsuit/ |access-date=2023-03-15 |publisher=Thomas More Society |language=en-US}}</ref> Legal scholar ] viewed the suit as an attempt to get the Texas courts to recognize fetal personhood.<ref name="NYT2023-3-14">{{Cite news |last=Goldberg |first=Michelle |date=2023-03-14 |title=Opinion: Abortion Opponents Want to Make Women Afraid to Get Help From Their Friends |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/13/opinion/abortion-lawsuit-texas.html |access-date=2023-03-15 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Lawyers for the plaintiff said the suit would add the manufacturer of the abortion drugs once it is identified.<ref name="TexTrib2023-3-10"/><ref name="TMS2023-3-11"/><ref name="NPR2023-03-11">{{Cite news |last=McCammon |first=Sarah |date=March 11, 2023 |title=A Texas lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for abortion pill access |work=] |url=https://www.npr.org/2023/03/11/1162886824/a-texas-lawsuit-could-have-far-reaching-implications-for-abortion-pill-access |access-date=2023-04-11}}</ref>

In 2024, the firm attempted to remove ] (a citizen-initiated ballot proposal to amend the state constitution to recognize a right to abortion) from the November 2024 ballot. Secretary of State ] directed the referendum to be removed from the ballot, but the ] reversed this decision, ordering the amendment to remain on the ballot.<ref>Anna Spoerre, , ''Missouri Independent'' (September 10, 2024).</ref>


===LGBT issues=== ===LGBT issues===
In 2013, the Thomas More Society intervened on behalf of five ] ]s who ] and sought to block its ].<ref>, '']'' (June 26, 2013).</ref><ref> Juliet Eilperin, , ''Washington Post'' (July 18, 2013).</ref> In 2013, the Thomas More Society intervened on behalf of five ] ]s who ] and sought to block its ].<ref>, '']'' (June 26, 2013).</ref><ref>Juliet Eilperin, , ''Washington Post'' (July 18, 2013).</ref>

⚫ The group represented a former ] student who claimed that he was expelled from the university's master's degree in counseling program for refusing to counsel same-sex couples. The university settled in 2017 with the ex-student for $25,000.<ref>Joe Harris, , Courthouse News Service (January 16, 2017).</ref>


In May 2022, aided by the Thomas More Society, a former ] employee Daniel Snyder filed a federal lawsuit against the company alleging religious discrimination. Snyder lost his job at Arconic's ] plant in June 2021 after publicly posting on the company's intranet his objection to using a rainbow to promote ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kauffmann |first1=Clark |title=Iowan sues after being fired for calling gay pride 'an abomination to God' |url=https://eu.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2022/06/08/iowan-sues-after-being-fired-calling-gay-pride-an-abomination/7559315001/ |access-date=12 September 2024 |work=Des Moines Register |date=8 June 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Terminated employee files appeal in Arconic lawsuit |url=https://www.ourquadcities.com/news/local-news/terminated-employee-files-appeal-in-arconic-lawsuit/ |access-date=12 September 2024 |work=Our Quad Cities News |date=22 November 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Snyder v. Arconic: Fired for Believing What the Bible Teaches (December 14, 2023) |url=https://www.thomasmoresociety.org/news/snyder-v-arconic-fired-for-believing-what-the-bible-teaches |website=Thomas More Society |access-date=12 September 2024}}</ref> In August 2024, the ] dismissed Snyder's appeal.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Morris |first1=William |title=Fired for anti-gay online posting, Riverdale man loses religious discrimination lawsuit |url=https://eu.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2024/08/14/arconic-employee-fired-anti-lgbt-discrimination-suit-8th-circuit-hampton-rainbow/74797367007/ |access-date=12 September 2024 |work=Des Moines Register |date=14 August 2024}}</ref>
⚫ The group represented a former ] student who was expelled from the university's masters degree in counseling program for refusing to counsel same-sex couples. The university settled in 2017 with the ex-student for $25,000.<ref>Joe Harris, , Courthouse News Service (January 16, 2017).</ref>


===Divorce=== ===Divorce===
Line 25: Line 39:


===Challenges to COVID-19 public health measures=== ===Challenges to COVID-19 public health measures===
During the ], the Thomas More Society filed a number of lawsuits on behalf of various parties to stop or weaken public health measures supposedly implemented to stop the spread of the ]. They contended that capacity limits, ] rules, ], and vaccine mandates violates the religious liberties of churches and individuals.<ref>David Crary, , Associated Press (August 13, 2020).</ref><ref>Marina Villeneuve, , Associated Press (October 9, 2020).</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Lawsuit Challenges New York City's 'Key to NYC' Vaccine Initiative on Religious Grounds |url=https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2022/02/08/lawsuit-challenges-new-york-citys-key-to-nyc-vaccine-initiative-on-religious-grounds/ |access-date=2022-05-27 |website=New York Law Journal |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=DuVall |first=Eric|title=Lawyers petition U.S. Supreme Court over NY vaccine mandate |url=https://buffalonews.com/news/local/lawyers-petition-u-s-supreme-court-over-ny-vaccine-mandate/article_a15c1c86-4419-11ec-a52a-2bb82c796ef3.html |access-date=2022-05-27 |website=Buffalo News |language=en}}</ref> The group filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of a ] anti-abortion group which claimed that the COVID-19 restriction on public gatherings unlawfully blocked the group from gathering.<ref>Joe Kelly, , Courthouse News Service (November 6, 2020).</ref> During the ], the Thomas More Society filed lawsuits on behalf of various parties to stop or weaken public health measures implemented to stop the spread of the ]. They contended that capacity limits, ] rules, ], and vaccine mandates violates the religious liberties of churches and individuals.<ref>David Crary, , Associated Press (August 13, 2020).</ref><ref>Marina Villeneuve, , Associated Press (October 9, 2020).</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Lawsuit Challenges New York City's 'Key to NYC' Vaccine Initiative on Religious Grounds |url=https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2022/02/08/lawsuit-challenges-new-york-citys-key-to-nyc-vaccine-initiative-on-religious-grounds/ |access-date=2022-05-27 |website=New York Law Journal |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=DuVall |first=Eric|title=Lawyers petition U.S. Supreme Court over NY vaccine mandate |url=https://buffalonews.com/news/local/lawyers-petition-u-s-supreme-court-over-ny-vaccine-mandate/article_a15c1c86-4419-11ec-a52a-2bb82c796ef3.html |access-date=2022-05-27 |website=Buffalo News |date=November 12, 2021 |language=en}}</ref> The group represented ], a ] ], in one case.<ref>Nathan Solis, , Courthouse News Service (August 13, 2020).</ref> It filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of a ] anti-abortion group which claimed that the COVID-19 restriction on public gatherings unlawfully blocked the group from gathering.<ref>Joe Kelly, , Courthouse News Service (November 6, 2020).</ref>


===Failed efforts to overturn 2020 presidential election outcome=== ===Failed efforts to overturn 2020 presidential election outcome===
Line 32: Line 46:
*, Associated Press (December 4, 2019).</ref> *, Associated Press (December 4, 2019).</ref>


In 2020, after Trump was defeated by ] in the ], the Thomas More Society established the '''Amistad Project''' as part of an ].<ref name=TietoEllis/> Trump repeatedly and falsely claimed that the election was marred by voter fraud.<ref name=TietoEllis/> The project was led by former ] (and later ] professor) ],<ref name=TietoEllis/><ref name=Carpenter>{{cite news |last1=Carpenter |first1=Tim |title=Despite suspension of law license, former Kansas AG Phill Kline helping out in anti-Biden election lawsuits |url=https://www2.ljworld.com/news/state-region/2020/dec/01/despite-suspension-of-law-license-former-kansas-ag-phill-kline-helping-out-in-anti-biden-election-lawsuits/ |access-date=December 30, 2020 |work=Lawrence Journal-World |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref> although his law license was suspended.<ref name=Carpenter/> The effort was tied to ], a senior legal adviser to the Trump campaign who was also special counsel to the Thomas More Society.<ref name=TietoEllis/> The Amistad Projects filed lawsuits on behalf of supposed "grassroots" groups (with titles such as the "Pennsylvania Voters Alliance" and "Wisconsin Voters Alliance") in the ]s won by Biden (], ], ], ], and ]). All the suits were rejected or dismissed by the courts.<ref name=TietoEllis/> Ellis's tie to the society and the project suggested "a coordinated effort to flood the nation's courts with repetitive litigation" allowing Trump to continue to claim that the election results remain contested.<ref name=TietoEllis/> In 2020, after Trump was defeated by ] in the ], the Thomas More Society established the '''Amistad Project''' as part of an ].<ref name=TietoEllis/> Trump repeatedly and falsely claimed that the election was marred by voter fraud.<ref name=TietoEllis/> The project was led by former ] (and later ] professor) ],<ref name=TietoEllis/><ref name=Carpenter>{{cite news |last1=Carpenter |first1=Tim |title=Despite suspension of law license, former Kansas AG Phill Kline helping out in anti-Biden election lawsuits |url=https://www2.ljworld.com/news/state-region/2020/dec/01/despite-suspension-of-law-license-former-kansas-ag-phill-kline-helping-out-in-anti-biden-election-lawsuits/ |access-date=December 30, 2020 |work=Lawrence Journal-World |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref> although his law license was suspended.<ref name=Carpenter/> The effort was tied to ], a senior legal adviser to the Trump campaign who was also special counsel to the Thomas More Society.<ref name=TietoEllis/> The Amistad Projects filed lawsuits on behalf of supposed "grassroots" groups (with titles such as the "Pennsylvania Voters Alliance" and "Wisconsin Voters Alliance") in the ]s won by Biden (], ], ], ], and ]). All the suits were rejected or dismissed by the courts.<ref name=TietoEllis/> Ellis's tie to the society and the project suggested "a coordinated effort to flood the nation's courts with repetitive litigation" allowing Trump to continue to claim that the election results remain contested.<ref name=TietoEllis/>


On December 14, 2020, ahead of the ] vote, Amistad Project attorney Ian Northon accompanied a group of self-described "Republican electors" in ] who were attempted to cast Michigan electoral votes for Trump, despite Biden winning Michigan and being previously certified as the winner. Northon claimed the "electors" were "fulfilling their constitutional duty."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Egan |first1=Paul |last2=Boucher |first2=Dave |title=Michigan GOP legislative leaders seek to ease tensions ahead of Electoral College vote |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/michigan-gop-shirkey-chatfield-electoral-college-vote/6541772002/ |access-date=December 16, 2020 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=December 14, 2020}}</ref> The fake "votes" cast by the pro-Trump "alternate electors" have no legal standing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/paulmcleod/electoral-college-trump-supporters|work=Buzzfeed News|title=Pro-Trump Republicans Are Holding Fake Electoral College Votes While The Real Electoral College Meets To Formalize Biden's Win|author=Paul McLeod|date=December 14, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|author=Nick Corasaniti & Jim Rutenberg|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/15/technology/fake-dueling-slates-of-electors.html|newspaper=New York Times|title=No, there aren't 'alternate electors' who can vote for President Trump.|date=December 15, 2020}}.</ref> On December 14, 2020, ahead of the ] vote, Amistad Project attorney Ian Northon accompanied a group of self-described "Republican electors" in ] who were attempting to cast Michigan electoral votes for Trump, despite Biden winning Michigan and being previously certified as the winner. Northon claimed the "electors" were "fulfilling their constitutional duty."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Egan |first1=Paul |last2=Boucher |first2=Dave |title=Michigan GOP legislative leaders seek to ease tensions ahead of Electoral College vote |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/michigan-gop-shirkey-chatfield-electoral-college-vote/6541772002/ |access-date=December 16, 2020 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=December 14, 2020}}</ref> The fake "votes" cast by the pro-Trump "]" have no legal standing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/paulmcleod/electoral-college-trump-supporters|work=Buzzfeed News|title=Pro-Trump Republicans Are Holding Fake Electoral College Votes While The Real Electoral College Meets To Formalize Biden's Win|author=Paul McLeod|date=December 14, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|author=Nick Corasaniti & Jim Rutenberg|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/15/technology/fake-dueling-slates-of-electors.html|newspaper=New York Times|title=No, there aren't 'alternate electors' who can vote for President Trump.|date=December 15, 2020}}.</ref>


On December 22, 2020, after the electors had cast their votes, the Amistad Project sued in ] on behalf of a variety of plaintiffs: ten voters, five organizations, and eight state legislators. The two Michigan legislators listed as plaintiffs later requested to be dropped from the suit, feeling that the suit that was filed differed too strongly from what they had agreed to.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mauger |first1=Craig |title=2 Michigan lawmakers listed in suit seeking legislative approval of election results |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/22/michigan-maddock-rendon-republican-lawmakers-sue-legislature-approval-presidential-election-results/4014283001/ |access-date=December 23, 2020 |work=The Detroit News |date=December 22, 2020}}</ref> The project sued, among others, ] ], governors, election officials, and legislative officials in the battleground states; the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, and the ] itself.<ref>{{cite web|title=Complaint|publisher=Case 1:20-cv-03791 |url=https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/DC-WVA-20201222-complaint.pdf |website=Election Law Blog}}</ref> The group asked the court to (as the district court later described in denying the request) "declare unconstitutional ] for President of the United States; to invalidate multiple state statutes regulating the certification of Presidential votes; to ignore certain Supreme Court decisions; and, the coup de grace, to enjoin the U.S. Congress from ], and declaring Joseph R. Biden the next President."<ref name=>'''', Civil Action No. 20-3791 (JEB) (D.D.C. January 4, 2021).</ref> The suit was derided by legal community for the substance of its arguments, the broadness of its goals, and for naming the Electoral College as a defendant, with notes that the Electoral College is not something that exists, but a process that happens.<ref name="dumbest">{{cite news |last1=Lambe |first1=Jerry |title=Lawyers Have a Field Day After Republicans File 'the Single Dumbest Election Lawsuit of the Entire Cycle' |url=https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/lawyers-have-a-field-day-after-republicans-file-the-single-dumbest-election-lawsuit-of-the-entire-cycle/ |access-date=December 24, 2020 |work=Law&Crime |date=December 23, 2020}}</ref> On December 22, 2020, after the electors had cast their votes, the Amistad Project sued in ] on behalf of a variety of plaintiffs: ten voters, five organizations, and eight state legislators. The two Michigan legislators listed as plaintiffs later requested to be dropped from the suit, feeling that the suit that was filed differed too strongly from what they had agreed to.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mauger |first1=Craig |title=2 Michigan lawmakers listed in suit seeking legislative approval of election results |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/22/michigan-maddock-rendon-republican-lawmakers-sue-legislature-approval-presidential-election-results/4014283001/ |access-date=December 23, 2020 |work=The Detroit News |date=December 22, 2020}}</ref> The project sued, among others, ] ], governors, election officials, and legislative officials in the battleground states; the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, and the ] itself.<ref>{{cite web|title=Complaint|publisher=Case 1:20-cv-03791 |url=https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/DC-WVA-20201222-complaint.pdf |website=Election Law Blog}}</ref> The group asked the court to (as the district court later described in denying the request) "declare unconstitutional ] for President of the United States; to invalidate multiple state statutes regulating the certification of Presidential votes; to ignore certain Supreme Court decisions; and, the coup de grace, to enjoin the U.S. Congress from ], and declaring Joseph R. Biden the next President."<ref>'''', Civil Action No. 20-3791 (JEB) (D.D.C. January 4, 2021).</ref> The suit was derided by legal community for the substance of its arguments, the broadness of its goals, and for naming the Electoral College as a defendant, with notes that the Electoral College is not something that exists, but a process that happens.<ref name="dumbest">{{cite news |last1=Lambe |first1=Jerry |title=Lawyers Have a Field Day After Republicans File 'the Single Dumbest Election Lawsuit of the Entire Cycle' |url=https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/lawyers-have-a-field-day-after-republicans-file-the-single-dumbest-election-lawsuit-of-the-entire-cycle/ |access-date=December 24, 2020 |work=Law&Crime |date=December 23, 2020}}</ref>


On January 4, 2021, U.S. District Judge ] denied the society's motion for a preliminary injunction, noting that plaintiffs lacked standing, the case was filed in the wrong court, and that plaintiffs made no effort to ] the other side. Boasberg wrote that in addition to those procedural problems, "the suit rests on a fundamental and obvious misreading of the Constitution. It would be risible were its target not so grave: the undermining of a democratic election for President of the United States."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Marley |first1=Patrick |title=Federal judge scoffs at election lawsuit brought by Wisconsin Republicans and others |url=https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/04/judge-scoffs-election-lawsuit-brought-wisconsin-republicans/4130711001/ |access-date=January 4, 2021 |work=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel |date=January 4, 2021}}</ref> On January 4, 2021, U.S. District Judge ] denied the society's motion for a preliminary injunction, noting that plaintiffs lacked standing, the case was filed in the wrong court, and that plaintiffs made no effort to ] the other side. Boasberg wrote that in addition to those procedural problems, "the suit rests on a fundamental and obvious misreading of the Constitution. It would be risible were its target not so grave: the undermining of a democratic election for President of the United States."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Marley |first1=Patrick |title=Federal judge scoffs at election lawsuit brought by Wisconsin Republicans and others |url=https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/04/judge-scoffs-election-lawsuit-brought-wisconsin-republicans/4130711001/ |access-date=January 4, 2021 |work=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel |date=January 4, 2021}}</ref>


], the former justice of the ] who led a state-funded investigation into unfounded allegations of fraud in the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin, was hired by the Thomas More Society<ref>{{cite news|url=https://journaltimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/from-well-qualified-to-an-embarrassment-robin-vos-180-degree-reversal-on-michael-gableman/article_92cfb57c-18d7-11ed-88d9-071b6bf14af8.html |title=Gableman back on familiar ground: election fraud |newspaper=] |date=September 19, 2022 |last=Hölzel|first=Dee}}</ref> after being fired by the politician who hired him, ] ], in August 2022.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://journaltimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/from-well-qualified-to-an-embarrassment-robin-vos-180-degree-reversal-on-michael-gableman/article_92cfb57c-18d7-11ed-88d9-071b6bf14af8.html |title=From 'well qualified' to 'an embarrassment': Robin Vos' 180-degree reversal on Michael Gableman |newspaper=] |date=August 10, 2022 |last=Rogan |first=Adam}}</ref>
⚫ === Education lawsuits ===

⚫ In July 2021, the law firm sued the ] for changing the name and mascots at ] because of Serra's association with the ] and the ]. The firm's press release blamed a {{" '}}]' mentality that radical leftist people in education are trying to force on an unwilling American public".<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 15, 2021 |title=Group sues San Diego Unified over high school name change |url=https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/group-sues-san-diego-unified-over-serra-high-school-name-change/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220525173803/https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/group-sues-san-diego-unified-over-serra-high-school-name-change/ |archive-date=May 25, 2022 |access-date=May 25, 2022 |website=FOX 5 San Diego |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=San Diego Community Members Sue School Board for Unlawful High School Name Change |url=https://thomasmoresociety.org/san-diego-community-members-sue-school-board-for-unlawful-high-school-name-change/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210813143331/https://thomasmoresociety.org/san-diego-community-members-sue-school-board-for-unlawful-high-school-name-change/ |archive-date=August 13, 2021 |website=Thomas More Society}}</ref> The school was renamed to Canyon Hills High School after the firm's request for a ] was denied.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ojeda |first1=Artie |title=Controversial Name Change: Ceremony Marks Official Unveiling of Canyon Hills High School In Tierrasanta |url=https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/controversial-name-change-ceremony-marks-official-unveiling-of-canyon-hills-high-school-in-tierrasanta/2744524/ |access-date=May 26, 2022 |work=NBC 7 San Diego |date=October 14, 2021}}</ref>
⚫ === Education ===
⚫ In July 2021, the law firm sued the ] for changing the name and mascots at ] because of Serra's association with the ] and the ]. The firm's press release blamed a {{" '}}]' mentality that radical leftist people in education are trying to force on an unwilling American public".<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 15, 2021 |title=Group sues San Diego Unified over high school name change |url=https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/group-sues-san-diego-unified-over-serra-high-school-name-change/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220525173803/https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/group-sues-san-diego-unified-over-serra-high-school-name-change/ |archive-date=May 25, 2022 |access-date=May 25, 2022 |website=FOX 5 San Diego |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release |title=San Diego Community Members Sue School Board for Unlawful High School Name Change |url=https://thomasmoresociety.org/san-diego-community-members-sue-school-board-for-unlawful-high-school-name-change/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210813143331/https://thomasmoresociety.org/san-diego-community-members-sue-school-board-for-unlawful-high-school-name-change/ |archive-date=August 13, 2021 |publisher=Thomas More Society |date=July 14, 2021 }}</ref> The school was renamed to Canyon Hills High School after the firm's request for a ] was denied.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ojeda |first1=Artie |title=Controversial Name Change: Ceremony Marks Official Unveiling of Canyon Hills High School In Tierrasanta |url=https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/controversial-name-change-ceremony-marks-official-unveiling-of-canyon-hills-high-school-in-tierrasanta/2744524/ |access-date=May 26, 2022 |work=NBC 7 San Diego |date=October 14, 2021}}</ref>


In January 2022, the law firm reached a settlement agreement between its client ] and the ] to remove ] and ] prayers from its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wu |first=Wenyuan |date=January 14, 2022 |title=Victory! The State of California Removes the Aztec and Ashe Prayers from Its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum |url=https://cferfoundation.org/pr011422/ |website=Californians for Equal Rights}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Thomas |first=Jessel |date=January 18, 2022 |title=California Department of Education Removes Aztec and Ashe Prayers From Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum |work=Latin Post |url=https://www.latinpost.com/articles/153656/20220118/california-department-education-removes-aztec-ashe-prayers-ethnic-studies-model.htm}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Dorman |first=Sam |date=January 17, 2022 |title=California agrees to remove Aztec, Ashe chants from curriculum after legal challenge |url=https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-remove-aztec-ashe-chants-curriculum-legal-challenge |access-date=May 25, 2022 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref> In January 2022, the law firm reached a settlement agreement between its client ] and the ] to remove ] and ] prayers from its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wu |first=Wenyuan |date=January 14, 2022 |title=Victory! The State of California Removes the Aztec and Ashe Prayers from Its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum |url=https://cferfoundation.org/pr011422/ |website=Californians for Equal Rights}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Thomas |first=Jessel |date=January 18, 2022 |title=California Department of Education Removes Aztec and Ashe Prayers From Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum |work=Latin Post |url=https://www.latinpost.com/articles/153656/20220118/california-department-education-removes-aztec-ashe-prayers-ethnic-studies-model.htm}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Dorman |first=Sam |date=January 17, 2022 |title=California agrees to remove Aztec, Ashe chants from curriculum after legal challenge |url=https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-remove-aztec-ashe-chants-curriculum-legal-challenge |access-date=May 25, 2022 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref>
Line 49: Line 65:


==External links== ==External links==
* *
]

] ]
] ]
Line 56: Line 72:
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 10:37, 12 October 2024

Conservative anti-abortion American law firm based in Chicago This article is about the national law firm based in Chicago, Illinois. For the law firm in Ann Arbor, Michigan, see Thomas More Law Center.

The Thomas More Society is a conservative Roman Catholic public-interest law firm based in Chicago. The group has been engaged in many "culture war" issues, promoting its anti-abortion and anti-same-sex marriage beliefs through litigation. The society filed cases as part of Donald Trump's failed attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, in which Trump was defeated.

History and ideology

Founded by Tom Brejcha in 1997, the group won two U.S. Supreme Court victories against the National Organization for Women in Scheidler v. National Organization for Women in 2003 and 2006. Brejcha is the president and chief counsel of the group. The Thomas More Society has been engaged in many "culture war" issues, promoting its anti-abortion and anti-same-sex marriage beliefs through litigation.

The Thomas More Society is one of a broader set of Christian conservative legal organizations (CCLOs), which include Alliance Defending Freedom, American Center for Law and Justice, First Liberty Institute, Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, Liberty Counsel, National Legal Foundation, Christian Legal Society, and Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.

Organization

The Thomas More Society received 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status in November 1999. On its 2022 Form 990, it reported revenue of $13.4 million and expenses of $16.3 million.

The society is listed on the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' "Directory of Lay Movements, Organizations, and Professional Associations" as a National Catholic Association.

Litigation

Reproduction issues

In partnership with the CatholicVote Legal Defense Fund, the Thomas More Society has challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's mandate requiring companies' health insurance plans to cover contraceptives and sterilization.

In 2015, the Thomas More Society filed amicus briefs in the civil case of actress Sofia Vergara, who was sued by her ex-boyfriend in a frozen embryo case; the society, along with other anti-abortion groups, sought to have the courts treat the embryo as children (under a "best interests of the child" standard) rather than as marital property. The case tied into a broader "personhood" debate that had emerged in the politics of abortion.

In 2016, the Thomas More Society represented anti-abortion activist David Daleiden, of California, pro bono.

In 2018, the Executive Council of Iowa, which included Republican Governor Kim Reynolds, hired the Thomas More Society to defend Iowa in a legal challenge against Iowa's recently passed abortion law, the strictest in the nation. The group stepped in to represent the state after Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, a Democrat, declined to defend the law's constitutionality. The group represented the state without a fee. A state court blocked the Iowa law from going into effect.

In 2023 the Thomas More Society joined in representing a Texas man in a suit against his ex-wife's associates. The plaintiff alleges they aided the ex-wife in obtaining the drugs for medical abortion. Asserting that assisting a self-managed abortion is murder, the suit was brought pursuant to wrongful death statutes rather than the Texas Heartbeat Act ("S.B. 8"), the anti-abortion vigilante act. Legal scholar Melissa Murray viewed the suit as an attempt to get the Texas courts to recognize fetal personhood. Lawyers for the plaintiff said the suit would add the manufacturer of the abortion drugs once it is identified.

In 2024, the firm attempted to remove Missouri Amendment 3 (a citizen-initiated ballot proposal to amend the state constitution to recognize a right to abortion) from the November 2024 ballot. Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft directed the referendum to be removed from the ballot, but the Missouri Supreme Court reversed this decision, ordering the amendment to remain on the ballot.

LGBT issues

In 2013, the Thomas More Society intervened on behalf of five Illinois county clerks who opposed same-sex marriage and sought to block its legalization in Illinois.

The group represented a former Missouri State University student who claimed that he was expelled from the university's master's degree in counseling program for refusing to counsel same-sex couples. The university settled in 2017 with the ex-student for $25,000.

In May 2022, aided by the Thomas More Society, a former Arconic employee Daniel Snyder filed a federal lawsuit against the company alleging religious discrimination. Snyder lost his job at Arconic's Riverdale plant in June 2021 after publicly posting on the company's intranet his objection to using a rainbow to promote Gay Pride Month. In August 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed Snyder's appeal.

Divorce

In 2020, the society filed an amicus brief in the Nebraska Supreme Court in the case of Dycus v. Dycus, urging the court to strike down Nebraska's no-fault divorce law. The court upheld the law.

Challenges to COVID-19 public health measures

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Thomas More Society filed lawsuits on behalf of various parties to stop or weaken public health measures implemented to stop the spread of the virus. They contended that capacity limits, social distancing rules, face covering requirements, and vaccine mandates violates the religious liberties of churches and individuals. The group represented Grace Community Church, a Los Angeles County megachurch, in one case. It filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of a Wisconsin anti-abortion group which claimed that the COVID-19 restriction on public gatherings unlawfully blocked the group from gathering.

Failed efforts to overturn 2020 presidential election outcome

The Thomas More Society has been aligned with the presidential administration of Donald Trump. Trump appointed Sarah Pitlyk, a special counsel to the society, to a federal district judgeship.

In 2020, after Trump was defeated by Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election, the Thomas More Society established the Amistad Project as part of an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Trump repeatedly and falsely claimed that the election was marred by voter fraud. The project was led by former Kansas Attorney General (and later Liberty University professor) Phillip Kline, although his law license was suspended. The effort was tied to Jenna Ellis, a senior legal adviser to the Trump campaign who was also special counsel to the Thomas More Society. The Amistad Projects filed lawsuits on behalf of supposed "grassroots" groups (with titles such as the "Pennsylvania Voters Alliance" and "Wisconsin Voters Alliance") in the swing states won by Biden (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin). All the suits were rejected or dismissed by the courts. Ellis's tie to the society and the project suggested "a coordinated effort to flood the nation's courts with repetitive litigation" allowing Trump to continue to claim that the election results remain contested.

On December 14, 2020, ahead of the electoral college vote, Amistad Project attorney Ian Northon accompanied a group of self-described "Republican electors" in Lansing who were attempting to cast Michigan electoral votes for Trump, despite Biden winning Michigan and being previously certified as the winner. Northon claimed the "electors" were "fulfilling their constitutional duty." The fake "votes" cast by the pro-Trump "alternate electors" have no legal standing.

On December 22, 2020, after the electors had cast their votes, the Amistad Project sued in D.C. federal court on behalf of a variety of plaintiffs: ten voters, five organizations, and eight state legislators. The two Michigan legislators listed as plaintiffs later requested to be dropped from the suit, feeling that the suit that was filed differed too strongly from what they had agreed to. The project sued, among others, Vice President Mike Pence, governors, election officials, and legislative officials in the battleground states; the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, and the electoral college itself. The group asked the court to (as the district court later described in denying the request) "declare unconstitutional several decades-old federal statutes governing the appointment of electors and the counting of electoral votes for President of the United States; to invalidate multiple state statutes regulating the certification of Presidential votes; to ignore certain Supreme Court decisions; and, the coup de grace, to enjoin the U.S. Congress from counting the electoral votes on January 6, 2021, and declaring Joseph R. Biden the next President." The suit was derided by legal community for the substance of its arguments, the broadness of its goals, and for naming the Electoral College as a defendant, with notes that the Electoral College is not something that exists, but a process that happens.

On January 4, 2021, U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg denied the society's motion for a preliminary injunction, noting that plaintiffs lacked standing, the case was filed in the wrong court, and that plaintiffs made no effort to serve the other side. Boasberg wrote that in addition to those procedural problems, "the suit rests on a fundamental and obvious misreading of the Constitution. It would be risible were its target not so grave: the undermining of a democratic election for President of the United States."

Michael Gableman, the former justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court who led a state-funded investigation into unfounded allegations of fraud in the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin, was hired by the Thomas More Society after being fired by the politician who hired him, Speaker of the Wisconsin State Assembly Robin Vos, in August 2022.

Education

In July 2021, the law firm sued the San Diego Unified School District for changing the name and mascots at Junipero Serra High School because of Serra's association with the mission system and the cultural assimilation of Native Americans. The firm's press release blamed a "'cancel culture' mentality that radical leftist people in education are trying to force on an unwilling American public". The school was renamed to Canyon Hills High School after the firm's request for a temporary restraining order was denied.

In January 2022, the law firm reached a settlement agreement between its client Californians for Equal Rights and the California Department of Education to remove Aztec and Ashe prayers from its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum.

References

  1. Cauterucci, Christina (January 28, 2016). "Frozen embryos and the anti-abortion activists who love them". Slate magazine. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
  2. "Anti-Abortion Groups Join Battles Over Frozen Embryos". The New York Times. January 20, 2016. Retrieved February 4, 2016. Thomas Olp, of the Thomas More Society, a conservative law firm that filed the brief in concert with Missouri Right to Life and other anti-abortion groups, said...
  3. ^ Amanda Hollis-Brusky & Joshua C. Wilson, Separate But Faithful: The Christian Right's Radical Struggle to Transform Law & Legal Culture (Oxford University Press, 2020), p. 128: "the Chicago-based Thomas More Society (TMS), a different conservative Catholic PILO"
  4. Eugene Volokh, Ban on profane, rude, or indecent speech that disturbs houses of worship violates the First Amendment, The Volokh Conspiracy, Washington Post (March 9, 2015): "the Thomas More Society would generally be seen as a conservative Catholic public interest law firm"
  5. ^ Rex W. Huppke (2013). "Thomas More Society celebrates 15 years on the front line of the culture wars". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
  6. ^ Jon Swaine, Rosalind S. Helderman, Josh Dawsey and Tom Hamburger, Conservative nonprofit group challenging election results around the country has tie to Trump legal adviser Jenna Ellis, Washington Post (December 7, 2020).
  7. Rutenberg, Jim; Becker, Jo; Lipton, Eric; Haberman, Maggie; Martin, Jonathan; Rosenberg, Matthew; Schmidt, Michael S. (January 31, 2021). "77 Days: Trump's Campaign to Subvert the Election". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved February 1, 2021.
  8. ^ Jack Bouboushian, Court Nixes Challenge to Contraceptive Mandate, Courthouse News Service (September 18, 2013).
  9. ^ Henry Farrell, These are the conservative legal groups behind the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, Washington Post (December 5, 2017).
  10. ^ Thomas More Society, ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer.
  11. "Directory of Lay Movements, Organizations, and Professional Associations". United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
  12. Jennifer S. Mann, Missouri lawmaker, wife ask court for contraception insurance exclusion, Religion News Service (September 9, 2014).
  13. "Anti-Abortion Groups Join Battles Over Frozen Embryos". The New York Times. January 20, 2016. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
  14. Marcotte, Amanda (January 20, 2016). "The new anti-choice mission: Target frozen embryos to make it harder for couples like Sofia Vergara and Nick Loeb to break up". Salon. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
  15. Coker, Matt (February 4, 2016). "Irvine Anti-Abortion Activist Unveils New Abortion Sting Video on Eve of Court Date". OC Weekly. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
  16. Coker, Matt (January 27, 2016). "Planned Parenthood Hit Videographers Indicted in Texas". OC Weekly. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
  17. Pearl, Mike (January 26, 2016). "What We Know About the Charges Against the Pro-Life Hidden Camera Activists". VICE. Retrieved February 4, 2016.
  18. Council OKs outside law firm to defend Iowa in abortion suit, Associated Press (May 21, 2018).
  19. Rox Laird, Anti-Abortion Group Can't Join Iowa Legal Brawl, Courthouse News Service (September 6, 2018).
  20. ^ David Pitt, Judge agrees to halt fetal heartbeat abortion law in Iowa, Associated Press (June 1, 2018).
  21. Lithwick, Dahlia; Stern, Mark Joseph (March 15, 2023). "Sued for Offering Friendship". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  22. ^ Klibanoff, Eleanor (March 10, 2023). "Three Texas women are sued for wrongful death after allegedly helping friend obtain abortion medication". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  23. ^ "Father of Aborted Unborn Child Brings Wrongful-Death Lawsuit" (Press release). Thomas More Society. March 11, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  24. Goldberg, Michelle (March 14, 2023). "Opinion: Abortion Opponents Want to Make Women Afraid to Get Help From Their Friends". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  25. McCammon, Sarah (March 11, 2023). "A Texas lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for abortion pill access". NPR News. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
  26. Anna Spoerre, Missouri Supreme Court rules amendment legalizing abortion will remain on ballot, Missouri Independent (September 10, 2024).
  27. Illinois gay marriage foes to maintain legal strategy, Journal Star (June 26, 2013).
  28. Juliet Eilperin, State officials balk at defending laws they deem unconstitutional, Washington Post (July 18, 2013).
  29. Joe Harris, Anti-Gay Counselor Gets $25,000 From Missouri State, Courthouse News Service (January 16, 2017).
  30. Kauffmann, Clark (June 8, 2022). "Iowan sues after being fired for calling gay pride 'an abomination to God'". Des Moines Register. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  31. "Terminated employee files appeal in Arconic lawsuit". Our Quad Cities News. November 22, 2022. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  32. "Snyder v. Arconic: Fired for Believing What the Bible Teaches (December 14, 2023)". Thomas More Society. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  33. Morris, William (August 14, 2024). "Fired for anti-gay online posting, Riverdale man loses religious discrimination lawsuit". Des Moines Register. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  34. Grant Schulte, No-fault divorce law faces legal challenge in Nebraska, Associated Press (September 3, 2020).
  35. ^ Dycus v. Dycus, 307 Neb. 426, 949 N.W.2d 357 (2020).
  36. Baumert, Mark (October 9, 2020). "State Supreme Court rejects Hastings divorce appeal". KOLN.
  37. David Crary, More US churches sue to challenge COVID-19 restrictions, Associated Press (August 13, 2020).
  38. Marina Villeneuve, Court allows NY virus restrictions ahead of Jewish holidays, Associated Press (October 9, 2020).
  39. "Lawsuit Challenges New York City's 'Key to NYC' Vaccine Initiative on Religious Grounds". New York Law Journal. Retrieved May 27, 2022.
  40. DuVall, Eric (November 12, 2021). "Lawyers petition U.S. Supreme Court over NY vaccine mandate". Buffalo News. Retrieved May 27, 2022.
  41. Nathan Solis, Megachurch Sues LA County, California Over Indoor Worship Ban, Courthouse News Service (August 13, 2020).
  42. Joe Kelly, Wisconsin Appeals Court Tosses Limit on Public Gatherings, Courthouse News Service (November 6, 2020).
  43. Short of Money to Run Elections, Local Authorities Turn to Private Funds, New York Times (September 25, 2020).
  45. ^ Carpenter, Tim (December 1, 2020). "Despite suspension of law license, former Kansas AG Phill Kline helping out in anti-Biden election lawsuits". Lawrence Journal-World. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
  46. Egan, Paul; Boucher, Dave (December 14, 2020). "Michigan GOP legislative leaders seek to ease tensions ahead of Electoral College vote". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved December 16, 2020.
  47. Paul McLeod (December 14, 2020). "Pro-Trump Republicans Are Holding Fake Electoral College Votes While The Real Electoral College Meets To Formalize Biden's Win". Buzzfeed News.
  48. Nick Corasaniti & Jim Rutenberg (December 15, 2020). "No, there aren't 'alternate electors' who can vote for President Trump". New York Times..
  49. Mauger, Craig (December 22, 2020). "2 Michigan lawmakers listed in suit seeking legislative approval of election results". The Detroit News. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  50. "Complaint" (PDF). Election Law Blog. Case 1:20-cv-03791.
  51. Wisconsin Voters Alliance v. Pence, Civil Action No. 20-3791 (JEB) (D.D.C. January 4, 2021).
  52. Lambe, Jerry (December 23, 2020). "Lawyers Have a Field Day After Republicans File 'the Single Dumbest Election Lawsuit of the Entire Cycle'". Law&Crime. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  53. Marley, Patrick (January 4, 2021). "Federal judge scoffs at election lawsuit brought by Wisconsin Republicans and others". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  54. Hölzel, Dee (September 19, 2022). "Gableman back on familiar ground: election fraud". Racine Journal Times.
  55. Rogan, Adam (August 10, 2022). "From 'well qualified' to 'an embarrassment': Robin Vos' 180-degree reversal on Michael Gableman". Racine Journal Times.
  56. "Group sues San Diego Unified over high school name change". FOX 5 San Diego. July 15, 2021. Archived from the original on May 25, 2022. Retrieved May 25, 2022.
  57. "San Diego Community Members Sue School Board for Unlawful High School Name Change" (Press release). Thomas More Society. July 14, 2021. Archived from the original on August 13, 2021.
  58. Ojeda, Artie (October 14, 2021). "Controversial Name Change: Ceremony Marks Official Unveiling of Canyon Hills High School In Tierrasanta". NBC 7 San Diego. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
  59. Wu, Wenyuan (January 14, 2022). "Victory! The State of California Removes the Aztec and Ashe Prayers from Its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum". Californians for Equal Rights.
  60. Thomas, Jessel (January 18, 2022). "California Department of Education Removes Aztec and Ashe Prayers From Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum". Latin Post.
  61. Dorman, Sam (January 17, 2022). "California agrees to remove Aztec, Ashe chants from curriculum after legal challenge". Fox News. Retrieved May 25, 2022.

External links

Categories: