| Revision as of 02:54, 21 February 2007 editIlena (talk | contribs)1,128 edits Barrett lost another motion to me today← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:55, 29 March 2007 edit undoThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits archive to history | ||
| (77 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div style="background: #ffff99; border: 1px solid #cc9900; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;"> | |||
| It really might be a good idea to get something into Evidence before bothering with proposals at all... --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 19:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This page has been blanked as a courtesy to prevent sensitive material associated with editors' real life identities from showing up on internet searches. The page has not been deleted and the former discussion is available through the edit history. Please do not revert this page without discussing it with an arbitration ] or a member of the ]. ] 21:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)</div> | |||
| *My line of thinking was - "I make a point, then I prove it." ✎ <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ( ] • ] )</span> 19:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Per their talk pages, both Ilena and Fyslee are working on statements with diffs. They have asked if there is a "deadline" for their presentations. I have advised that they should move promptly but there is no actual deadline or timetable. If the arbitrators have a specific target date in mind for reaching this case, please advise so the parties can be aware. ] 19:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Nope. And Mr. W. Dragon's point makes sense. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: From a practical POV, Peter's methodology sounds good, but he has not yet provided any proof. Can someone get him to do so? (From a scientific POV his methodology is more questionable, as the "points" he makes should be developed based on the evidence, not the opposite. But....this situation is more like a courtroom than a laboratory...;-) -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> (<b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b>) 17:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I understand this and apologise. I have had very little free time due to real life concerns (namely a full time job that ends up cutting into home time too), however I'll try and get something done before I go to sleep this evening. {{unsigned|Peter M Dodge}} | |||
| :: I understand you are having trouble and sympathize with you in this situation. Keep in mind that some of the rest of us are also pressed very hard by this unnecessary situation that could have been prevented from escalating. My original private (well, there's no such thing as private here! - and I can see now unwise) comment about suicidal thoughts was not coming out of nowhere, and you of all people should know what depression (especially when caused and then exacerbated by these constant attacks and now an RfArb) can do to people's thinking. It is very disturbing and causes one to say too much in the wrong settings. So please be careful how you deal with this situation and please provide evidence as soon as possible. Be careful not leave out anything, because that will only force me to dig up what has been left out, since context is important. We are both aware that there are things that don't really have to be brought up, but I will balance things if necessary. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> (<b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b>) 11:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ilena's early ip addresses?== | |||
| Since Ilena's earliest edits here on Misplaced Pages where through ip addresses less than a year ago, I thought it might be helpful to list them here. I just ran across {{user|196.40.14.198}}. I believe there are a few more that were listed somewhere. --] 00:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :What's interesting there is to follow the next couple of . Fyslee quickly accuses her of being a sock puppet. I don't think there was any deliberate deception there on Ilena's part - just a fundamental lack of Misplaced Pages know-how. And thus Fyslee's antagonizing of Ilena begins. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="2" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 01:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, the sockpuppet accusations are unfounded. BLP, NPOV, and NPA warnings should have been given instead. --] 01:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Totally. Though NPA? Was she attacking an editor personally? Mind you, this was before the subject of the article became an editor. But yes to BLP and NPOV. I think if Fyslee would have started out treating Ilena with a gentler hand, we might not be at this point here with the RfArb. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="2" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 01:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{user|196.40.12.109}} is another --] 01:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: True enough about not technically being a sock. She just kept switching around and I thought she was gaming the system. That was a long time ago! | |||
| :::: As far as where we are now, you can thank her mentor. We all may have contributed in various ways, but it could have been stopped if she hadn't been protected and defended when she did wrong. It happened all too often, with chiding remarks all too few. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> (<b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b>) 01:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{user|196.40.12.109}} is another --] 01:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| '''Various IPs from Costa Rica''' | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/196.40.14.198 | |||
| 16:55, 10 March 2006 (hist) (diff) Talk:Stephen Barrett (→Two different matters) '''linkspam''' | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/196.40.12.109 | |||
| 20:37, 10 March 2006 (hist) (diff) Talk:Stephen Barrett (→Two different matters) '''linkspam''' | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/196.40.12.235 | |||
| 23:12, 6 July 2006 (hist) (diff) The National Council Against Health Fraud (→Introduction) | |||
| 23:10, 6 July 2006 (hist) (diff) Stephen Barrett (→Biography) | |||
| 23:08, 6 July 2006 (hist) (diff) Stephen Barrett (→External links) | |||
| 23:04, 6 July 2006 (hist) (diff) Stephen Barrett (→External links) '''linkspam''' | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/196.40.14.167 | |||
| 16:47, 7 July 2006 (hist) (diff) Stephen Barrett (→External links) '''linkspam''' | |||
| 16:46, 7 July 2006 (hist) (diff) Stephen Barrett (→Biography) | |||
| 16:45, 7 July 2006 (hist) (diff) Stephen Barrett (→Platform for activism) | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/200.122.153.238 | |||
| 03:17, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→External links) | |||
| 03:16, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→Lower court rulings) | |||
| 03:15, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→Lower court rulings) '''link spam''' | |||
| 03:14, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→California Supreme Court decision) | |||
| 03:13, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→External links) '''link spam''' | |||
| 03:12, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→California Supreme Court decision) | |||
| 03:11, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→Lower court rulings) | |||
| 03:10, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal (→Lower court rulings) | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/196.40.13.172 | |||
| 16:02, 6 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Barrett v. Rosenthal | |||
| 196.40.14.47 Used in a comment on my blog (11.17.05 - 10:05 pm). I have removed the '''link spam''' she left then. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> (<b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b>) 01:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::She is definitely not a newbie anymore, yet she has a NOOB user box on her user page. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> (<b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b>) 01:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Summarizing: Ilena has edited as: | |||
| *{{user|196.40.14.198}} on 10 March 2006 | |||
| *{{user|196.40.12.109}} on 10 March 2006 | |||
| *{{user|196.40.12.235}} on 6 July 2006 | |||
| *{{user|196.40.14.167}} on 7 July 2006 (same date she started editing as Ilena) | |||
| *{{user|200.122.153.238}} on 6 December 2006 (an ip used by others at other times) | |||
| *{{user|196.40.13.172}} on 6 December 2006 | |||
| --] 02:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===Thank you Ronz! === | |||
| I have never denied the edits I have made before I created an account. Because of the recent research because of your accusations, I just today found out that Stephen Barrett edited as recently as last month (January, 2007), and that before Fyslee slid in and took over, he was posting linkspam after linkspam and attempting to change the history of various articles. | |||
| ] ... after this, Fyslee and friends did the honors. | |||
| Barrett had another bad day today, btw ... he just lost yet another motion! <b><font color="999900">]</font></b> <font color="#999999" size="2">]</font> 02:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, the fact that Barrett edited as Sbinfo is noted at the very top of ] in a position that will never be moved to the archives. Since this ArbCom is not about Barrett's behavior here on Misplaced Pages, I don't think it's relevant. --] 02:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||