| Revision as of 20:01, 18 July 2022 editFrankensteinsDad (talk | contribs)357 edits →July 2022: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:48, 18 March 2023 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,398 edits Declining unblock request (unblock-review) | ||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> | Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> | ||
| ==May 2020== | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a ] that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in ], disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos1 -->. If you are adding sources, please try and follow the format that is used on the page. Adding bare urls as you did with the AllMovie links is not useful for wikipedia. I would suggest reading and experimenting with ] on your sandbox page.] (]) 22:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I'm sorry, but the source I found said there were 3 directors on Interzone, which would make them all co-directors. Also regarding bare urls, I went to the infolink you sent me and it says "There is nothing wrong with adding bare URL references to Misplaced Pages. If you only have time and inclination to copy the reference URL you found, we thank you for your contribution!" Are you sure you sent me to the right spot?] (]) 14:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Its not inherently wrong if you only have time, but after you made the edits with bare-URLs, you went on shortly after to make more edits. So I don't think time was a factor. I would still suggest learning how to cite properly. ] (]) 10:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == March 2021 == | == March 2021 == | ||
| Line 52: | Line 46: | ||
| == July 2022 == | == July 2022 == | ||
| ] Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to ], appear to be ]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally ] way, are highly ] and can lead to a ] or ]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through ]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Please stop copying and pasting discussions from other places to my talk; discussions on the issue should be on ].<!-- Template:uw-point --> ] (]) 18:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thank you for contributing to the article ]. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Misplaced Pages's core policies is that contributions must be ] through ], preferably using ]. If you require further assistance, please look at ], or ask at the ]. For additional information, please see ] & ].<!-- Template:uw-unreliable --> ] (]) 18:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :After my info about Greg Rucka's son was removed from his article, I was told specifically to discuss it further on Greg Rucka's talk page. Then when I post a comment on the talk page asking for a discussion I get indefinitely BLOCKED? Good one. Why didn't you guys just tell me Greg Rucka is editing the information that goes on his page? That would've been a lot simpler. FrankensteinsDad (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC) ] (]) 17:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ---Lilach5 (]) ] 04:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == July 2022 == | |||
| Due to your violations of the policy on ], you have been indefinitely blocked from ] and its talk page. Please read the ]. ] (]) 05:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. | |||
| You have shown interest in '''articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles.''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 05:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :After my info about Greg Rucka's son was removed from his article, even though I provided at least ten reference sources, I was told specifically to discuss it further on Greg Rucka's talk page. Then when I post a comment on the talk page asking for a discussion I get indefinitely BLOCKED? Good one. Why didn't you guys just tell me Greg Rucka didn't want the information on his page? That would've been a lot simpler. Thanks for your impartial handling of the matter. ] (]) 16:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::When you wrote {{tpq|It has everything to do with Rucka. It shows what kind of child he has raised, which says a lot about him as a father}}, you disqualified yourself from writing about Greg Rucka on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 17:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::I am not aware of any communication from Greg Rucka about this article. I am acting to enforce ] policy. ] (]) 17:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::They ASKED me why it pertained to his article! If the article is about Rucka and his personal life, and he's got a son who is arrested vandalizing storefronts 3,000 miles away from where he lives, I'd say the son's arrest was a definite life-changing event in Rucka's personal life as well. That's why I put it under "Personal life" where such things are discussed in most wiki articles. Why does his article have to be kept sanitized? ] (]) 17:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::An arrest (no conviction has been verified) of an adult son does not belong in the biography of his father. The arrest was covered by unreliable sensationalist tabloid newspapers, not by impeccably reliable sources. Have you read, studied and completely understood the essential ] policy? Your various comments make it crystal clear that your motivation is a desire to besmirch this man's reputation through guilt by association. That type of behavior simply is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 17:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Well I certainly have nothing against the guy, I just thought it was a very unique incident, the part about him travelling 3,000 miles to smash some innocent people's windows. The sources I listed showed actual mug shots of the kid's face as he was getting booked, so how could the sources all be unreliable? It doesn't matter what newspaper reported it, it's either true or it's not. Anyway, I'd appreciate if you'd take the block off? I promise I won't revisit the page. Sorry for causing any trouble. ] (]) 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Since you show no sign of understanding and accepting ] and ] policies, I will not be unblocking you. If you want another administrator to review the situation, follow the unblock request instructions at ]. ] (]) 20:42, 24 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| If you look at the page you sent me to, it says "There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable... The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims." The news item I took from the Times has nothing to do with a medical claim. It is simply a report of Rucka's son getting arrested in NYC for committing vandalism and is 100% accurate. If you don't believe the story is true, please ask Mr. Rucka, and I'm sure he will corroborate it. | |||
| </div> | |||
| : Your source is: https://nypost.com/2020/09/06/comic-book-artists-son-arrested-in-blm-rampage-in-nyc/ which is the NY Post and not the New York Times. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1124425181 --> | |||
| * The ] guidance states: {{xt| There is consensus that the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics. A tabloid newspaper, editors criticise its lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including a number of examples of outright fabrication. Editors consider the New York Post more reliable in the period before it changed ownership in 1976, and particularly unreliable for coverage involving the New York City Police Department}}. | |||
| * The ] guidance states: {{xt|Outside exceptional circumstances, the source should normally not be used, and it should never be used for information about a living person. Even in cases where the source may be valid, it is usually better to find a more reliable source instead. If no such source exists, that may suggest that the information is inaccurate.}} | |||
| : This is an unreliable source which is why I am reverting your edits. Please do not ]; if you would like to add this information, please find a ]. ] (]) 01:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Why is my account blocked? == | |||
| ] Please stop adding unreferenced or ] biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at ]. Content of this nature could be regarded as ] and is in violation of ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> ] (]) 22:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ] (]) 21:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :I listed at least ten reference sources. You are the one engaging in an editing war. You are vandalizing my sourced additions and you have no right to do it. If you took the time to check the story, you'll see it is 100% true, and you have no right to keep removing my statements as they are sourced and referenced. If you persist in vandalising the sites, I will report you to wikipedia. ] (]) 22:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Per ] the new york post is an unreliable source, any unsouced information will be challegened and removed Per ] ] (]) 23:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::I deleted the NY post and the Sun as references, as you requested. I'm assuming the remaining ten references are suitable? Thanks for your input. Hopefully this will resolve the issue. ] (]) 23:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I should probally bring this to your attention that Daily Mail (including Daily Mail UK) is generally Unrelaible and the use of the source is generally prohibited per ] ] (]) 19:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ::::::It seems like no conservative newspapers are reliable any more. That's really odd. ] (]) 20:01, 18 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 23:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|decline=Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)|1=Could someone help me please? My account has been blocked, and I did not commit any violations of wikipedia. I don't even know why I've been blocked. Can someone please help me fix this? Thanks. ] (]) 18:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)}} | |||
| You are the one edit warring, not me. I simply listed a true news report regarding the subject of the article and backed it up with at least ten references. It's not slander if it is true, and it certainly pertains to the article. You keep vandalizing my submissions even though they are sourced. If one or two of the sources are invalid, then tell me and i'll remove them. But all ten sources cannot be wrong. THe story is 100% reliable and is true. Some of the sources even show photographs of Rucka's son's mug shot after he was arrested. With all those sources and photographic evidence, how can none of the reference sources be true? Not possible! | |||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 18 March 2023
Welcome!
Hi FrankensteinsDad! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternately, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
March 2021
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Misplaced Pages. They must be written in original language to comply with Misplaced Pages's copyright policy. On The Lightning Express. — Diannaa (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfonso Brescia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War of the Robots. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to User talk:Sariel Xilo, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Please stop copying and pasting discussions from other places to my talk; discussions on the issue should be on Talk:Greg Rucka. Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- After my info about Greg Rucka's son was removed from his article, I was told specifically to discuss it further on Greg Rucka's talk page. Then when I post a comment on the talk page asking for a discussion I get indefinitely BLOCKED? Good one. Why didn't you guys just tell me Greg Rucka is editing the information that goes on his page? That would've been a lot simpler. FrankensteinsDad (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC) FrankensteinsDad (talk) 17:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ---Lilach5 (לילך5) discuss 04:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Due to your violations of the policy on Biographies of living people, you have been indefinitely blocked from Greg Rucka and its talk page. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 05:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Cullen328 (talk) 05:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- After my info about Greg Rucka's son was removed from his article, even though I provided at least ten reference sources, I was told specifically to discuss it further on Greg Rucka's talk page. Then when I post a comment on the talk page asking for a discussion I get indefinitely BLOCKED? Good one. Why didn't you guys just tell me Greg Rucka didn't want the information on his page? That would've been a lot simpler. Thanks for your impartial handling of the matter. FrankensteinsDad (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- When you wrote
It has everything to do with Rucka. It shows what kind of child he has raised, which says a lot about him as a father
, you disqualified yourself from writing about Greg Rucka on Misplaced Pages. Cullen328 (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)- I am not aware of any communication from Greg Rucka about this article. I am acting to enforce WP:BLP policy. Cullen328 (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- They ASKED me why it pertained to his article! If the article is about Rucka and his personal life, and he's got a son who is arrested vandalizing storefronts 3,000 miles away from where he lives, I'd say the son's arrest was a definite life-changing event in Rucka's personal life as well. That's why I put it under "Personal life" where such things are discussed in most wiki articles. Why does his article have to be kept sanitized? FrankensteinsDad (talk) 17:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- An arrest (no conviction has been verified) of an adult son does not belong in the biography of his father. The arrest was covered by unreliable sensationalist tabloid newspapers, not by impeccably reliable sources. Have you read, studied and completely understood the essential WP:BLP policy? Your various comments make it crystal clear that your motivation is a desire to besmirch this man's reputation through guilt by association. That type of behavior simply is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. Cullen328 (talk) 17:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well I certainly have nothing against the guy, I just thought it was a very unique incident, the part about him travelling 3,000 miles to smash some innocent people's windows. The sources I listed showed actual mug shots of the kid's face as he was getting booked, so how could the sources all be unreliable? It doesn't matter what newspaper reported it, it's either true or it's not. Anyway, I'd appreciate if you'd take the block off? I promise I won't revisit the page. Sorry for causing any trouble. FrankensteinsDad (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- An arrest (no conviction has been verified) of an adult son does not belong in the biography of his father. The arrest was covered by unreliable sensationalist tabloid newspapers, not by impeccably reliable sources. Have you read, studied and completely understood the essential WP:BLP policy? Your various comments make it crystal clear that your motivation is a desire to besmirch this man's reputation through guilt by association. That type of behavior simply is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. Cullen328 (talk) 17:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- When you wrote
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Why is my account blocked?
FrankensteinsDad (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
FrankensteinsDad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Could someone help me please? My account has been blocked, and I did not commit any violations of wikipedia. I don't even know why I've been blocked. Can someone please help me fix this? Thanks. FrankensteinsDad (talk) 18:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon 18:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.