Revision as of 14:41, 26 July 2022 editFostera12 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,665 edits ←Created page with 'Proposing the article for deletion due to the fact that the subject is highly opinionated and biased. What constitutes pan indian film the information is already available in those specific movie article. No such movement started since 2015.~~~~' | Latest revision as of 23:41, 2 August 2022 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators763,259 edits →Pan-Indian film: Closed as keep (XFDcloser) | ||
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''keep'''. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 23:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | |||
:{{la|1=Pan-Indian film}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | |||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Pan-Indian film}}) | |||
Proposing the article for deletion due to the fact that the subject is highly opinionated and biased. What constitutes pan indian film the information is already available in those specific movie article. No such movement started since 2015.] (]) 14:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC) | Proposing the article for deletion due to the fact that the subject is highly opinionated and biased. What constitutes pan indian film the information is already available in those specific movie article. No such movement started since 2015.] (]) 14:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep'''. version of the article is better imo. actually. Many Kannada, Telugu, etc films have had huge pan-India releases.The nominator seems to be in an edit war in the article. ] (]) 19:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 21:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 21:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
*<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly ] to the log (]). I have transcluded it to ]. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 21:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)</small><!--Cyberbot I relist--> | |||
*'''Keep''' The topic is covered by mutliple ]-compliant sources, therefore it meets the notability criteria. I have the article to it's pre-edit warring state so that the merit of the topic can be assessed by uninvolved users. ]. | |||
:The following independent reliable sources sources present significant coverage about the topic in hand: | |||
# Srivastan S, '']'' (7 January 2022) | |||
# : Manoj Kumar R , Gabbeta Ranjith Kumar, '']'' (11 July 2018) | |||
# Nidhima Taneja. '']'' (16 January 2022) | |||
# Juhi Chakraborty, '']'' (23 April 2021) | |||
# Prakash Pecheti, '']'' (17 June 2021) | |||
# Bharti Dubey and Hemachandra Ethamukkala, '']'' (23 April 2022) | |||
:"highly opinionated and biased" is not valid rationale for deletion. We write articles based on independent reliable sources. If such sources are opinionated and biased, then the same is reflected in the article. -- ] (]) 08:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*'''Keep''' No need of deletion as article is full of reliable sources. And all the films in it are notable. ] (]) 15:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*'''Keep''' It is evident that the term/film movement received wide recognition in the media and the critics. Also, there are plenty of sources that solely covers the topic.] (]) 16:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment:''' If the article seems opinionated and biased perhaps pursuing ] edits would be a better route to take than deletion. ] (]) 07:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*'''Keep''' - NPOV is not a great reason for deleting an article on its own, especially when notability appears met and there is a better version restored. ] (]) 13:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
{{clear}} | |||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 23:41, 2 August 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz 23:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Pan-Indian film
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Pan-Indian film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Proposing the article for deletion due to the fact that the subject is highly opinionated and biased. What constitutes pan indian film the information is already available in those specific movie article. No such movement started since 2015.Fostera12 (talk) 14:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This version of the article is better imo. Huge movement actually. Many Kannada, Telugu, etc films have had huge pan-India releases.The nominator seems to be in an edit war in the article. DareshMohan (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 26. —Talk to my owner:Online 21:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The topic is covered by mutliple WP:GNG-compliant sources, therefore it meets the notability criteria. I have restored the article to it's pre-edit warring state so that the merit of the topic can be assessed by uninvolved users. Misplaced Pages:Deletion is not cleanup.
- The following independent reliable sources sources present significant coverage about the topic in hand:
- The 'pan-Indian' strategy of Telugu cinema Srivastan S, The Hindu (7 January 2022)
- Baahubali turns 5: How SS Rajamouli’s film changed Indian cinema forever: Manoj Kumar R , Gabbeta Ranjith Kumar, The Indian Express (11 July 2018)
- Allu Arjun’s Pushpa shows Telugu films have pan-India audience. Step aside, Bollywood Nidhima Taneja. The Print (16 January 2022)
- RRR, Pushpa, Liger, Radhe Shyam, Adipurush: Are pan India films the way forward? Juhi Chakraborty, The Hindustan Times (23 April 2021)
- New mantra for pan-India stories Prakash Pecheti, Telangana Today (17 June 2021)
- BigStory: Are pan-India films promoting too much violence? Bharti Dubey and Hemachandra Ethamukkala, The Times of India (23 April 2022)
- "highly opinionated and biased" is not valid rationale for deletion. We write articles based on independent reliable sources. If such sources are opinionated and biased, then the same is reflected in the article. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No need of deletion as article is full of reliable sources. And all the films in it are notable. Deepika o (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep It is evident that the term/film movement received wide recognition in the media and the critics. Also, there are plenty of sources that solely covers the topic.Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: If the article seems opinionated and biased perhaps pursuing NPOV edits would be a better route to take than deletion. Chagropango (talk) 07:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - NPOV is not a great reason for deleting an article on its own, especially when notability appears met and there is a better version restored. MaxnaCarta (talk) 13:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.