Misplaced Pages

Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:14, 11 August 2022 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 171.23.6.193 - "The article has a distinct lack of mention and content about ethnic cleansing: "← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:24, 18 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,915 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950)/Archive 21) (bot 
(32 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Vital article|topic=History|level=5|class=B}}
{{controversial}}
{{British English}} {{British English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Germany|class=B|importance=High|Prussia=yes|PrussiaImp=Mid}} {{WikiProject Germany|importance=High|Prussia=yes}}
{{WikiProject Poland|class=B|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Poland|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Czech Republic|class=B|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Czech Republic|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Yugoslavia|class=B}} {{WikiProject Yugoslavia|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Romania|class=B}} {{WikiProject Romania|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject European history|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=high}}
}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 24: Line 26:
|indexhere=yes |indexhere=yes
}} }}




== Euphemisms? == == Euphemisms? ==
Line 41: Line 41:
About 90% of the German population of the Czech borderlands had supported the Nazi and affilation to Nazi-Germany. Some 280 000 Germans in Czechoslovakia remained Czechoslovak citizens after the transfer. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> About 90% of the German population of the Czech borderlands had supported the Nazi and affilation to Nazi-Germany. Some 280 000 Germans in Czechoslovakia remained Czechoslovak citizens after the transfer. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:I've noticed this issue too. This expulsion led to the use of forced labour, rapes, executions, massacres, and the extinction of German language dialects and cultures. It surpassed the Jewish Holocaust of World War Two in terms of numbers of victims and was a great travesty for German heritage. Take Kaliningrad, where Germans were executed and used as slaves and German culture was erased and replaced (evidence most strikingly in the new architecture of the city. It is simply another example of the vilification of Germans post-war. ] (]) 13:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
==Internment==
This appears in the Intro: ''"Many German civilians were sent to internment and labour camps where they were used as forced labour as part of German reparations to countries in eastern Europe."'' It has a ref which I can't easily check, but my real problem is that it doesn't seem to be a summary of anything in the body of the article. Plenty of use of "internment camp", but just not in this context. I want to move it down into the body somewhere rather than simply delete it, but it really needs expansion then. Thoughts? - ] (]) 00:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

The death toll includes post war internment and labour camp deaths, in fact the German sources estimate 150,000 killed in the fighting and the remainder in the post war expulsion process. Internment and forced labor constituted the bulk of the losses.--] (]) 00:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Please become familiar with the facts, guessing will waste our time--] (]) 00:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)


: @"didn't apply to anti-fascists": in terms of the degrees this may be technically true (although not all of them contained this restriction), but in practice it meant nothing: one set of my grand parents lived in Czecheslovakia for a few generations. They were communists, and actively fought the Nazis. My grand father died in the process, and my grand mother spent the several years in a Gestapo prison, and was even officially acknowledged as an anti-fascist (including getting special stipend for the rest of her life from the East German government). And she was indeed formally offered the chance to stay in the village she was born: as one of a single-digit number of people (of the entire village), none of which she knew. Now, want to guess what this meant in practice? ] (]) 17:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a good summary of the figure of 600,000 that is cited by the ], ]. --] (]) 01:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
:This article should be reworded to more accurately reflect that it was an ethnic cleansing. "Expulsion" is only appropriate when talking about removing the Germans who had settled in areas that the Nazis conquered in WWII. When we're talking about removing Germans from areas where they had been living for hundreds of years, that's ethnic cleansing by any reasonable definition of the term. Whether removing the Germans was justified or not is frankly irrelevant, as this does not change the fact that it was an ethnic cleansing. Just because Nazi Germany committed one of the worst crimes in history with the Holocaust doesn't mean that we should use euphemisms to talk about what happened to Germans after the war.
:I propose largely replacing "expulsion" with "ethnic cleansing" whenever it refers to Germans living in areas where Germans had historically lived who were then forcibly removed. ] (]) 17:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{tqq|where Germans had historically lived who were then forcibly removed}}; so expulsion? This entire discussion is flawed because ''expulsion is a form of ethnic cleansing'' in the same way population exchange (e.g. ]) is a form of ethnic cleansing in the same way genocide is a form of ethnic cleansing. The full definition of ethnic cleansing is {{tqq|the attempt to get rid of—through '''deportation, displacement or even mass killing'''—members of an unwanted ethnic group}} (emphasis mine). ] (]) 19:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:::If "expulsion is a form of ethnic cleansing", then it shouldn't be controversial for the article to clearly state that millions of Germans were ethnically cleansed from their homes. The reason that can be controversial to say is because there is a difference in connotation between merely "expelling" people and the harsher implications under "ethnically cleansing" an entire demographic. Mass-killing isn't a requirement for ethnic cleansing to have occurred, but even if it were, in some cases, Germans were deliberately mass-killed in revenge for Nazi crimes, and in any case, their removal was done with flagrant disregard to civilian deaths if 500,000 to 1+ million died as a direct consequence. ] (]) 20:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


== Genocide Denial ==
== Between 1944 and 1948 about 31 million people ==


What's up with the genocide denial in this article? ] (]) 08:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
If we mention the population transfers, we should list also non-German nationalities. The context suggests the refugees were all ''German'' more or less.] (]) 09:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
:A very similar flight and expulstion of Italians is called ''an exodus'' (]) and not mentioned in this text.] (]) 09:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
:This is a good idea. ] (]) 01:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


:Because this wasn't a genocide. Not even close. ] (]) 01:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
== A road sign ==
::It was a genocide under the ] which says that
::any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, '''in whole or in part''', a '''national, ethnic''', racial or religious group, as such:
::(a) Killing members of the group;
::(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
::(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical
::destruction in whole or in part;
::(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
::(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. ] (]) 11:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
:::The Allied expulsion removed the Nazi Herrenvolk und Lebensraum ideology from the Czech crown lands once and for all. ] (]) 08:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


No one has denied Holocaust in this article. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The caption isn't obvious. Reichenbach was Austrian and during WWII German. Danzig was German but a Free City between the wars.] (]) 11:01, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
== The article has a distinct lack of mention and content about ethnic cleansing ==


\
This is an unambiguous case of ethnic cleansing of Germans/German-linked 'undesirables' from large swathes of Europe.
The fact the German state of the time was itself a perpetrator of ethnic cleansing shouldn't be used as an excuse to downplay and ignore the obvious in this instance.


== Hungary section of the article ==
I would like to see the accurate description of this episode of ethnic cleansing recognised for what it is, more prominently.


In contrast to expulsions from other nations or states, the expulsion of the Germans from Hungary was dictated from outside Hungary. The section mixes the term "forced labor" with expulsion. Approximately 200 000 civilian Hungarian citizens were deported to the Soviet Union as forced laborers irrespective of their ethnicity/nationality. It's not to be mixed with the expulsion of the ethnic Germans to Germany. For the expulsion there was no "dictate from outside Hungary". The source of this information in the article is inactive. ] (]) 10:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
The reasons not to are up there with the same 'rationale' behind downplaying/ignoring other such crimes as the Armenian Genocide, or ironically enough the Holocaust. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:If you have a reliable source that these events were ethnic cleansing as opposed to expulsion please edit the article accordingly. Independent reliable sources that are explicit will be required.
::It meets the definition for ethnic cleansing perfectly, a group of "undesirable" people were removed from a place where they had lived for centuries. Using your logic someone should just put the dictionary definition of ethnic cleansing in the article. The rest of the contents will provide all the proof needed. ] (]) 01:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
] (]) 15:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
:It's a different term for the same thing - "expulsion" is fine.] (]) 21:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


== Population Movements Chart ==
:: The general consensus is that the expulsions were regrettable, tragic and often mishandled - yet ultimately justified and for the future good of Europe.] (]) 20:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
:::Please restrain yourself from posting such rubbish - especially without a claim to a Reliable Source (you won't find one) on the issue. ] (]) 21:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
:::There is not such ''general consensus''.(] (]) 20:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC))
:::They were absolutely unjustified. ] (]) 01:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


The section Population Movements includes a chart regarding the change in ethnic Germans in various countries. However, the title says it compares 1958 and 1930–31, while the actual columns of data refer to 1939 and 1930–31. I would assume that the data is actually from 1958 and it’s just a typo that has never been noticed for the last decade, but the numbers come from reference books, and I can’t be sure what the correct answer is. I am changing the column to 1958 because that makes far more sense, but wanted to flag it in was I am in the wrong—in which case it should still be cleared up.
It was ethnic cleansing through and through. It's a good example of the old adage "it's not a war crime if you win". ] (]) 05:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)


Separately, population numbers for the Netherlands were added to the chart several years later—but while the rest of the entries show the reduction in German population via subtraction, this one does not. It provides two similar citations which may or may not be to the same source, but it is hard to tell what they are specifically pointing to (which is kind of the point of a citation). ] (]) 19:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Ethnic cleansing of Czechs or Sudeten Germans?
The conclusions of the Potsdam Conference were confirmed by its signatory states in 1996. The US government, said: "The decisions made at Potsdam ... were soundly based in international law. The conference conclusions have been endorsed many times since in various multilateral and bilateral contexts. ... The conclusions of Potsdam are historical fact and the United States is confident that no country wishes to call them into question".
Ultimately justified and for the future good of Europe. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 12:24, 18 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconGermany: Prussia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconPoland High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCzech Republic Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconYugoslavia High‑importance
WikiProject iconFlight and expulsion of Germans (1944–1950) is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Misplaced Pages coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRomania High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconEuropean history High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHuman rights High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInternational relations High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Euphemisms?

It's interesting how the article uses language almost euphemistically. "Expulsion" is used in place of where "ethnic cleansing" would be appropriate nearly every single time; Contrast with articles dealing with the Armenian Genocide which use "harsher" language more liberally, so to speak. This article has some major issues. User: Dehler 15:04, 14 January 2020

Expulsion is used when transfered people are guilty, ethnic cleansing when transfered people are innocent. The Sudeten Germans Flocked to Hitler - Herrenvolk und Lebensraum. They were guilty.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.15.218.62 (talk) 07:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

There is no such thing as collective guilt. It exists only in propaganda and such language displays inhumane thinking. And maybe you should do a little research on the Sudetendeutsche opposision to the Nazis and their fate. --93.203.105.178 (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Supposing there were enough of them remaining.
You should do a little research on the Sudetendeutsche opposision to the Nazis and their fate in Dachau concentration camp and elsewhere during the Nazi-German occupation of the democratic Czechoslovakia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.23.6.193 (talk) 14:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

It is claimed that Sudeten Germans expelled from Czechoslovakia were based on the concept of collective guilt. This is not true.
Almost every decree explicitely stated that the sanctions did not apply to anti-fascists.
About 90% of the German population of the Czech borderlands had supported the Nazi and affilation to Nazi-Germany. Some 280 000 Germans in Czechoslovakia remained Czechoslovak citizens after the transfer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.23.6.193 (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

I've noticed this issue too. This expulsion led to the use of forced labour, rapes, executions, massacres, and the extinction of German language dialects and cultures. It surpassed the Jewish Holocaust of World War Two in terms of numbers of victims and was a great travesty for German heritage. Take Kaliningrad, where Germans were executed and used as slaves and German culture was erased and replaced (evidence most strikingly in the new architecture of the city. It is simply another example of the vilification of Germans post-war. Doorfrench (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
@"didn't apply to anti-fascists": in terms of the degrees this may be technically true (although not all of them contained this restriction), but in practice it meant nothing: one set of my grand parents lived in Czecheslovakia for a few generations. They were communists, and actively fought the Nazis. My grand father died in the process, and my grand mother spent the several years in a Gestapo prison, and was even officially acknowledged as an anti-fascist (including getting special stipend for the rest of her life from the East German government). And she was indeed formally offered the chance to stay in the village she was born: as one of a single-digit number of people (of the entire village), none of which she knew. Now, want to guess what this meant in practice? 174.59.220.235 (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
This article should be reworded to more accurately reflect that it was an ethnic cleansing. "Expulsion" is only appropriate when talking about removing the Germans who had settled in areas that the Nazis conquered in WWII. When we're talking about removing Germans from areas where they had been living for hundreds of years, that's ethnic cleansing by any reasonable definition of the term. Whether removing the Germans was justified or not is frankly irrelevant, as this does not change the fact that it was an ethnic cleansing. Just because Nazi Germany committed one of the worst crimes in history with the Holocaust doesn't mean that we should use euphemisms to talk about what happened to Germans after the war.
I propose largely replacing "expulsion" with "ethnic cleansing" whenever it refers to Germans living in areas where Germans had historically lived who were then forcibly removed. Megathonic (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
where Germans had historically lived who were then forcibly removed; so expulsion? This entire discussion is flawed because expulsion is a form of ethnic cleansing in the same way population exchange (e.g. Population exchange between Greece and Turkey) is a form of ethnic cleansing in the same way genocide is a form of ethnic cleansing. The full definition of ethnic cleansing is the attempt to get rid of—through deportation, displacement or even mass killing—members of an unwanted ethnic group (emphasis mine). Curbon7 (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
If "expulsion is a form of ethnic cleansing", then it shouldn't be controversial for the article to clearly state that millions of Germans were ethnically cleansed from their homes. The reason that can be controversial to say is because there is a difference in connotation between merely "expelling" people and the harsher implications under "ethnically cleansing" an entire demographic. Mass-killing isn't a requirement for ethnic cleansing to have occurred, but even if it were, in some cases, Germans were deliberately mass-killed in revenge for Nazi crimes, and in any case, their removal was done with flagrant disregard to civilian deaths if 500,000 to 1+ million died as a direct consequence. Megathonic (talk) 20:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Genocide Denial

What's up with the genocide denial in this article? 2003:C0:F720:F000:389F:2BEB:D917:7561 (talk) 08:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Because this wasn't a genocide. Not even close. SinoDevonian (talk) 01:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
It was a genocide under the CPPCG which says that
any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical
destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. Crainsaw (talk) 11:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
The Allied expulsion removed the Nazi Herrenvolk und Lebensraum ideology from the Czech crown lands once and for all. 171.23.6.193 (talk) 08:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

No one has denied Holocaust in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.15.223.133 (talk) 12:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

\

Hungary section of the article

In contrast to expulsions from other nations or states, the expulsion of the Germans from Hungary was dictated from outside Hungary. The section mixes the term "forced labor" with expulsion. Approximately 200 000 civilian Hungarian citizens were deported to the Soviet Union as forced laborers irrespective of their ethnicity/nationality. It's not to be mixed with the expulsion of the ethnic Germans to Germany. For the expulsion there was no "dictate from outside Hungary". The source of this information in the article is inactive. Hagnes2002 (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Population Movements Chart

The section Population Movements includes a chart regarding the change in ethnic Germans in various countries. However, the title says it compares 1958 and 1930–31, while the actual columns of data refer to 1939 and 1930–31. I would assume that the data is actually from 1958 and it’s just a typo that has never been noticed for the last decade, but the numbers come from reference books, and I can’t be sure what the correct answer is. I am changing the column to 1958 because that makes far more sense, but wanted to flag it in was I am in the wrong—in which case it should still be cleared up.

Separately, population numbers for the Netherlands were added to the chart several years later—but while the rest of the entries show the reduction in German population via subtraction, this one does not. It provides two similar citations which may or may not be to the same source, but it is hard to tell what they are specifically pointing to (which is kind of the point of a citation). Butterboy (talk) 19:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: