Revision as of 11:08, 31 August 2022 editNjd-de (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers28,228 editsm Rollback edit(s) by 180.252.89.33 (talk): Vandalism (UV 0.1.3)Tag: Rollback← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 10:59, 18 November 2024 edit undoOXYLYPSE (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,688 edits Rm nonsenseTag: 2017 wikitext editor |
(32 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
{{Old peer review|reviewedname=Adobe Systems|archive=1}} |
|
{{Vital article|topic=Society|level=5|link=Misplaced Pages:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences|anchor=%7b%7banchor%7cComputing, electronics and software%7d%7d Computing, electronics and software (42 articles)|class=B |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Computer graphics|importance=Mid}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=high}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=High}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject California|importance=mid|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=low}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Typography|importance=low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Archives|banner=yes|age=90|bot=ClueBot III}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Adobe Inc./Archive|format= %%i|age=2160|<!--90 days-->|header={{automatic archive navigator}}|maxarchsize=100000|minkeepthreads=4|numberstart=1}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Computer graphics|class=B|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
|
{{Refideas |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Computing|class=B|importance=high}} |
|
|
|
| {{cite web |last1=Peterson |first1=Jake |title=Adobe Photoshop's New Terms of Service Demands the Right to Access Your Work |url=https://lifehacker.com/tech/photoshops-terms-of-service-demands-the-right-to-your-content |website=] |date=June 6, 2024}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Companies|class=B|importance=High}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject California|class=B|importance=mid|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Apple Inc. |
|
|
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = y |
|
|
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = y |
|
|
| b3 <!--Structure --> = y |
|
|
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = y |
|
|
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = y |
|
|
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = y |
|
⚫ |
|class=B|importance=low}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Typography|class=B|importance=low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
⚫ |
{{Old peer review|reviewedname=Adobe Systems|archive=1}} |
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Adobe Systems/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080603155243/http://blogs.adobe.com/acom/2008/06/welcome_to_acrobatcom_work_tog_1.html to http://blogs.adobe.com/acom/2008/06/welcome_to_acrobatcom_work_tog_1.html |
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 19:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Update Adobe Inc. Logo == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Wikipedians, I'm writing to request a logo update in Adobe Inc. Misplaced Pages page. |
|
|
|
|
|
As Adobe has currently changed the design of the logo to https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Adobe_Corporate_Logo.png, please help to update the logo in Infobox from Adobe logo and wordmark (2017).svg to Adobe Corporate Logo.png. Thank you! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:I see no sign on Adobe's web site that they are changing the colors of their logo. I see no sign on Google News that they have announced such a change or that such a change has been noted by any of the design news web sites. Unless you can provide a citation to a reliable source for that information (see ] and ]), there is no need to change the logo in this article at this time. --] (]) 03:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
::And I take that back. The colors of the logo on the Adobe web site just changed this morning. Therefore, User:Shhuang123's proposed new logo now matches the one on the Adobe web site. I withdraw my opposition to the proposed logo update. |
|
|
::It is highly unlikely you could have known that Adobe was about to change its logo unless you are either a current Adobe employee, officer, or director or have a close relationship to one. If that's true, you need to openly disclose that information under ]. If you had done so, I would not have opposed the proposed update, or I would have merely argued that it should be delayed until Adobe had actually updated its web site.--] (]) 19:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::: Hi ], you are correct. Adobe has changed the logo on its website. Can you please use that as a source for the logo update? |
|
|
::: For your information, I have declared myself as an Adobe employee in my user page https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Shhuang123 to avoid COI. Thank you! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
::: Hi ], can you please let me know if I should update the logo or if anyone can help me update the logo? Thanks! shhuang 22:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
== "Day Software" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">]<sup>]</sup></span>''' 23:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Change Adobe Logo in InfoBox == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there Wikipedians, |
|
|
I wanted to say that I would like to change the Adobe Logo in InfoBox to this new logo : |
|
|
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Adobe_Systems_logo_and_wordmark.svg ] (]) 16:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Lawsuit == |
|
I withdraw this proposal as the proposed logo is old. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adobe Inc. is currently getting sued by the United States Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-complaint-against-adobe-and-two-adobe-executives-alleged-violations ) Shouldn't this be added? ] (]) 02:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
Thank you, |
|
|
Ananjanphotoshopcreations ] (]) 16:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Should "incorporated in Delaware" be added in the first sentence? == |
|
== Infobox : the number of employees is quite outdated == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed it has been reverted after I made a similar edit on Roblox Corporation. I'd like to open up discussion here to gather opinions, as this sentence is still in articles such as ] and ]. ] (]) 00:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
It says |
|
|
:11,847 (2013) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Tagging ] for relevant discussion. ] (]) 00:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
I understand that this figure comes from Wikidata (https://www.wikidata.org/Q11463?uselang=en#P1128), where, incidently the most recent and correct figure of 25,988 (3 December 2021) is available, but I cannot figure how to connect those dots. ] (]) 12:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::According to , "more than 60% of ] companies" and "more than 90% of U.S.-based companies that went public in 2021" are incorporated in Delaware. The article also points out why this is this is such an attractive choice. Furthermore, is almost double that of its population. |
|
|
::Because "big corporation incorporated in Delaware" is such a ubiquitous concept, while also being quite inconsequential for anything not law- or tax-related, this is hardly ever relevant to mention, especially in the lead or first sentence. I can see a "Litigation" section á la "Big Corp. was sued at the Court of Delaware, its place of incorporation, for ...", but not much else. |
|
|
::In both examples mentioned above, the source is either a financial document or an investor FAQ. I've also seen cases that link straight to the incorporation papers. None of these is a reliable, secondary source that somehow highlights why this is relevant to mention. |
|
|
::Thereby, I stand by my prior opinion that this kind of info should be excluded unless it is highlighted by secondary sources. In fact, if mentioned without the appropriate context why so many companies are Delawarian, this might even be confusing to the reader and should therefore be actively avoided. ] []] 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thanks for your response. I also support the option of omitting it from the first sentence after thinking. This is definititely a stylistic consistency issue and it concerns a fair amount of articles (just search for "incorporated in Delaware"). |
|
|
:::I am also interested in a ] if this talk page does not garner enough discussion, given how many articles it concerns. ] (]) 08:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== The year 2019 is misaligned in the table under the 'Finances' tab == |
|
== Sorry for inconvenience and delay to joint the clips of adobe systems... == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
okay and thanks enough ] (]) 13:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
The year 2019 is misaligned compared to the other years in the table under the 'Finances' tab. This makes the table look unprofessional in my opinion. ] (]) 09:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
|