| Revision as of 02:55, 28 September 2022 editAndreJustAndre (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,393 edits →Recent edit to page "recession": ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 23:32, 14 November 2024 edit undoTenWhile6 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,731 editsm TenWhile6 moved page User talk:Andrevan/ArchivedTalkHistory to User talk:AndreJustAndre/ArchivedTalkHistory: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Andrevan" to "AndreJustAndre" |
| (835 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
|
{{User:Andrevan/Buttons}} |
|
|
] |
|
|archiveprefix=User talk:Andrevan/Archives/ |
|
|
|
{{User:Andrevan/bigNotice|image=Card_catalog_from_page_167_of_"Manual_of_library_classification_and_shelf_arrangement"_(1898).jpg|title=This is an archive of the talk page history.|1= If you wish to start or revisit a discussion, please do so .}} |
|
|numberstart=54 |
|
|
|
{{-}} |
|
|format=%%i |
|
|
|header={{User:Andrevan/Talkt}} |
|
|
|archivebox=no |
|
|
|maxarchsize=35000 |
|
|
|age=72 |
|
|
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}</nowiki> |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:Andrevan/MainTalkPageHeader}} |
|
|
<!--- header --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Recent edit to page "recession" == |
|
|
|
|
|
Recently added a factual non biased neutral fact to the page "recession" relating to the redefinition in 2022 of the term in the US, and provided a link to the article referenced. This is a historical fact, is not biased, actually occurred, and should not be censored. Any scholor of economics would find that edit useful. I guess Misplaced Pages doesn't accept facts being added to articles? ] (]) 02:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:That is incorrect, this is well covered in the faq: ]. Or at least, it should be. The Biden admin did not change the definition of a recession. ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 02:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{tps|br}} {{ec}} Your edit makes comment on the current administration and cites '']'' which this left-wing website is less apt to accept. This is exactly the sort of thing you ought to develop consensus for on the article's talk page. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 02:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::What Chris means is, "There is consensus that The Post Millennial is generally unreliable. Editors have noted multiple instances of inaccurate reporting, and consider the publication to be strongly biased." Not "this left-wing website." ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 02:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
.jpg)