Misplaced Pages

User talk:WJBscribe: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:15, 28 February 2007 editCorbieVreccan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,682 edits Looking for Barnstar input and pointers← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:41, 31 December 2024 edit undoSkarmory (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,617 edits You are missed: Commenting. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Retired}}
{{User:WJBscribe/Talktop}}
{{nobots}}


== Thank you and a farewell note ==
== Sockpuppets... ==


I wanted to say a huge thank you not only to those who have posted supportive messages here and elsewhere, but also to those who have posted criticisms of my actions. It has been a pleasure editing this project alongside each and every one of you, whether we have agreed or not. I hope that those whose advice I have not felt able to follow over the last couple of weeks do think it fell on deaf ears. I have read every word and listened carefully.
I believe them to be the same because that IP address is of the same range, and they are haggling over exactly the same edits as before. ] 11:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
:Compare this new one: to the WHOIS entry that you were having problems with ] 11:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
::You may be interested in this... ] 21:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


Some have suggested that my recent actions have been out of character. I think that overlooks some of my history on this project. I have always believed more in principles than rules. Some may remember my unblock of Giano during the 2008 ArbCom elections, others my staunch objection to the existence of an off-wiki bureaucrat mailing list, or indeed my strong opposition to certain resysop decisions at ] that I felt ran contrary to the best interests of the project. It is probably true to say that I have been one of the most "activist" / "interventionist" bureaucrats. Whether that is a good or bad thing I leave to the judgment of others, but I make no apology for it.
==]==


Harassment is a serious issue, and one that has affected me personally in my time editing the project. I have never spoken publicly about the full reasons for my withdrawal from the 2008 ArbCom elections. I did so due to threats I received that actions would be taken against me in the real world to embarrass me and my then employer. I had recently started a new position and was relatively junior, so that was a threat that I could not ignore. I withdrew from the elections and resigned as an admin and bureaucrat. Some months later, when I felt more secure and established at work, I resumed service as an admin and bureaucrat. It has been a matter of great sadness to me to see some suggest that I don't take the issue of harassment seriously or that recent actions by me are supportive of harassment. That is not the case, and I caution people against being overly quick to accept unquestioningly a narrative that has been presented to them. The WMF account of its actions in relation to Fram does not withstand the most cursory scrutiny - it should be treated with utmost suspicion.
I think I know some of the people involved, so am not voting, but your assessment seems to be correct. A useful contrast might be ] and ] which are professional class telescopes available for school use. ] 12:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


There are two very serious problems facing the community at the moment, and neither ought to be allowed to eclipse the other:
:By the way, just sent you a text about ticket for tomorrow. Let me know what you want me to do ] 12:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
#'''WMF v community self-governance'''. There is an urgent need to clarify the extent to which WMF is required to defer to community consensus, and the extent to which it must explain its actions and be held accountable for them by local communities. Without this, the project will hemorrhage contributors. Absent sufficient autonomy, wikipedia will simply not be the project that many of us chose to give our time to. The number of staffers would need to rise exponentially to fill the gap. I suggest WMF think long and hard about the value to them of the volunteer time they benefit from.
#'''Fair process in WMF actions'''. In all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, the accused must have basic rights. Those include the right to know the name of their accuser(s), to understand what they are accused of, and to have the opportunity to defend themselves. The accused must also have the right for any public statement about them to clearly identify the misconduct that they were found to have committed, rather than to be subject to vague insinuations and innuendo thrown about from those who claim to speak from a position of authority. Fram has been treated abysmally. The decision of two of my fellow bureaucrats to re-enact a punishment applied by WMF with no respect for basic concepts of fairness was the last straw in convincing me that I could not continue here.


I would remind everyone that over the last few years I been minimally active on the project, with little time to dedicate to it. Everyone will be fine without me. I also think that it is time for this project to stop relying on old hands in key positions. ArbCom is increasingly comprised of re-elected former Arbs, many bureaucrats (including me) were elected over a decade ago. That's not a good thing. We need fresh blood in key roles.
::Not sure edits have improved the situation. You might want to go and fix the fact that the dome, and not the telescope, is 1.3 m across. The later would be something like the second largest telescope ever to be operational in the UK.... ] 12:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


I hope that matters are resolved in relation to the two issues that I have identified above such that in future I will feel able to continue contributing to this project, but my days as a bureaucrat or administrator are done. <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 11:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
==Helping out with the Unassessed Misplaced Pages Biographies==
::''Replies to this message and further discussion have been ]''


== Precious anniversary ==
Seeing that you are an active member of the ], I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of ] tagged with <nowiki>{{WPBiography}}</nowiki>. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --] 23:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| title = Precious
| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
| image_upright = 0.45
| bold = ]
}}
miss you - see Die Fliege (the fly) on my talk --] (]) 09:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


... so delighted to read your measured comments again, "old" crat ;) - ], read ] and enjoy ! --] (]) 16:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
==Zodiac killer==
I think I am correct here, but feel like a hard ass. Can you take a minute to ] and perhaps weigh in? I personally think if a living person is going to be accused of serial killing, we should add a source for that. Call me silly, but I think about libel lawsuits with those sorts of accusations. ] 05:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
:I agree 100% with you on the need for sources for anything controversial here and support your comments. We can't have hearsay that people are suspected serial killers being listed on Misplaced Pages. There should be:
:# a ref to confirm each person was a real suspect
:# a ref to confirm any piece of evidence which puports to connect them
:Hardcopy references should be just as good as web sources unless you have reason to doubt the person who is adding them (the fact readers have to go to a library to double check them shouldn't be an issue). Page numbers should be included though. By the way, my personal opinion is that the article is in a shocking state. Its full of OR and editorialising e.g. "Even if Kane is responsible for the disappearance of Donna Lass -- and it's possible she disappeared of her own free will -- that still does not make Kane the Zodiac" and "Finally, it should be noted that the SFPD has never sought to question Mr. X". Phrases like ''it should be noted'' are clealy against the MOS. If you're intending to take on tyding this one up- good luck! <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 05:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
::It will be a challenge indeed. The page was just unlocked after being fully protected for 2 weeks. There is a WP:OWN|ownership dispute, and these Zodiac ...err...enthusiasts take this page very seriously. I am starting on the refs, then will tackle the other (enormous) issues one by one. Thanks for having a look. ] 05:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


{{-}}
== RfA thanks ==
== Three years ago? Yikes. ==


On the off chance you still look in from time to time, I saw something that reminded me of something else which in turn reminded me of Framgate, and I'm amazed to see that it all started 3 years ago yesterday. It feels so much more recent. While thinking back on everything, I still don't regret a lot, but I do regret my part in your resignation and retirement. I imagine it was like 95% WMF's fault and 5% mine, but I regret that 5%. Hope you're well, and thanks for caring so much about the integrity of the project. --] (]) 20:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, WJBscribe, I just wanted to thank you for your support on ], which was successful with a final tally of 61/0/2. I'm honored at the trust the community has placed in me and hope my conduct as an administrator will justify that trust. If you have any comments about my use of the tools I would be glad to hear from you on my talk page. Thanks again! ] 08:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


You two are forever my heroes for your actions then. ] (]) 03:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
== Membership list ==


:{{ping|Floquenbeam}} It does feel both like a very long time ago and in another way just yesterday. I think even 5% is beating yourself up too much. I don't think events would have played out differently if you hadn't asked for your bits back at the noticeboard; I couldn't have watched things play out from the sidelines. In the end, the result would still have been the same, there wouldn't have been enough support for the actions I took (esp. re: Fram) and my position would have still have ended up untenable.<br/>Ultimately, it's not because I resigned the bits that I don't contribute any more, I miss everyone and care for the project, but I don't want to give valuable free labour to WMF. I was comfortable contributing to a community-run project advancing free knowledge that was largely self-governing save for the minimal legally required role that WMF originally had (and Jimbo's increasingly shrinking founder role). And I was happy to give my time to that project. But increasingly the projects are now <u>run</u> by WMF, which sees itself as having a governance role over a social movement. The goal of trying (perhaps in vain) to build a NPOV online encyclopaedia that was free to all was alluring. is depressing (it's like they didn't realise ] existed).<br/>The community has failed to stand up to WMF and has tacitly endorsed its every encroaching remit. More of those who have stayed, and those who joined recently, believe that WMF are <u>in charge</u>. They liken WMF to Facebook without understanding how Misplaced Pages is (was?) different. I feel that Facebook provides a service to its users whereas WMF receives services from the community. But it seems people don't see it that way. That's fine, I get it. From my point of view though, the battle for self-governance we won with Jimbo was then lost to WMF, which whittled it away a piece at a time. WMF forces through policies and tech features that no one wants, while ignoring the features that the community asks for and the bugs it's crying out to have fixed (e.g. ]). WMF now attempt to set the agenda, rather than responding to wishes of the projects. WMF even dictates where and how discussions happen, eschewing the noticeboards and consensus building structures we set up. People seem to be grudgingly accepting that. I couldn't and still can't. The result is that I don't want to give my time here any more, however tempting. <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 13:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
I have to agree with Satyr on this one: when you look through MILHIST's membership history, every other edit is Kirill Lokshin sorting out members who have put their names at the bottom. I also use it to update the inactive members list and the newsletter, which would be more difficult if I had to use the history. And besides, I get a kick out of being Member No.17 (I was when I joined). :D ] (Have a nice day!) 12:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
::Yes, I still see echoes of this in the recent UCoC enforcement vote (and many other issues too, but that's foremost in my head). Good to hear from you. Take care. --] (]) 22:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
:Fair enough. If you're both against the idea, I'll let it drop. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 12:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
:::Well, it seems you have nudged me slightly out of my self exile. I have at least commented on the current RfBs. I do look in from time to time. It may be that the community / WMF balance will improve with time. One can only hope... <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 11:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
::::Sorry, only people who support the WMF unconditionally are allowed to oppose RFB candidates. --] (]) 14:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
==Happy First Edit Day!==
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{{ombox
| name = First Edit Day
| image = ]
| imageright = ]
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| plainlinks = yes
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi WJBscribe! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ]<sup>]</sup> 21:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
}}


== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
== The Link ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Hey Buddy. K. I wanna use it on my User:Page. I want it to be a pic of a calculator that links to the page that shows my edit count. -- Cheers! ] 18:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Revert at ] ==


If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
Hi. Can you tell me why you reverted my edits on ]? . I have reverted your revert. (I used rollback to save time - hope you don't mind :)) Regards, - ] (]) 19:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
: Weird. Maybe you should file a report at the village pump. There must be a bug or something. Anyways, not a big deal. Appreciate your efforts in keeping the article vandal-free. - ] (]) 19:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


</div>
==My RfA==
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->


== Precious anniversary ==
] has closed successfully (79/0/1), so it appears that I am now an administrator. Thanks very much for your vote of confidence. If there's anything I can ever do to help, please don't hesitate to let me know. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 02:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Nine}}
Best wishes for what you do with your time, - miss you here. --] (]) 08:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


== RfA thanks == == You are missed ==


Thank you again for both your actions and your articulation of the danger to the project posed by the WMF. I greatly respect your decision to leave, but it's a sad loss. ] (]) 09:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting ]. It was (47/0/0) upon closure and now ] is complete. I think the tools will aid both me and the encyclopedia. Feel free to on my talk page, or if you think I'm misbehaving I'm always open to ]. Thanks, <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">]</font><sup>]</font></sup> 13:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
:{{ping|Yngvadottir}} Thank you, and I greatly appreciate your inclusion of "''This edit is not an endorsement of the WMF''" in your edit summaries. Were I to be minded to make any further edits in future, I would definitely adopt that! <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 13:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Let me second the sentiment that you are missed. It's hard to believe it's been five years since all that went down. I'm sorry things shook out like they did, but your principled stand was noticed by many. ] (]) 00:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
== Oversight ==
:I will also add that you are definitely missed. I'm damn happy that I got to know you while you were here; I'm one of the lucky users that had this privilege. ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 04:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

::Me, too! ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 04:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Neat. I didn't know they had an email. Thanks for the tip! ] 00:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
In light of some recent events, I went ahead and read back through some of the Fram situation (one that occurred before my time actively editing). I think Misplaced Pages would be well-served by more bureaucrats and administrators like you were at that time. Thank you for your service. <span style="background-color: black">] ] ]</span> 00:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

== Lists ==

Looks like Will Beback must have finished what he was doing. The few remaining comments are mostly notes that unsourced entries were deleted.

I can do a table, but since it's just a list of names now, it's going to become a big wall of blank fields that need to be filled in manually -- are you ready for that ]? <font face="Trebuchet MS, Trebuchet"><i><b>]]</b></i></font> 01:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
:OK then, that's easy enough. <font face="Trebuchet MS, Trebuchet"><i><b>]]</b></i></font> 01:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

== Angelo Sepe ==

The present version of the article is very different from the one that was deleted as a copyvio. It appears to be fine. ] 09:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

== List of... ==

Thanks for your help with the references. -] · ] · 03:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

:Currently, everyone in the list is sourced so it isn't violating BLP. I think it'd be fair to make a file of all the sourced names that are removed and place it in Chidom's user space so that his previous work wouldn't be lost. -] · ] · 17:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

==More ] crap==

Can you take another look at this? I deleted whole sections (all suspects, since most have been eliminated, and no arrests have ever been made), and anticipate a lot of resistance to the changes. Maybe you can watchlist it, if you don't mind. There's a Zodiac movie coming out on Friday, and I expect it's going to be hell on this page. ] 08:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
:I'll take a look. I suggest that on Friday you list it at ] so everyone knows its likely to be problematic. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 08:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree with your deletions 100%. I was very uncomfortable with the coverage of suspects that article. I will watchlist it so that any attempt to readd them will have to comply with ]. By the way, how reliable a source is 'www.zodiackiller.com' anyway? <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 08:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
:Well, it's been online for almost 10 years, and is the most comprehensive Zodiac killer site out there. 2 million hits a month. Featured on both TV and newspaper articles about the case. I think it's pretty reliable. . By the way, I already put the article on that notice board. The film is having advance screenings, and there are also several TV shows in America this week. The traffic to the article is way up already. Thanks for your help. ] 08:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

== open proxies ==

I've volunteered my comments on the issue you recently raised on my talk page, @ . I hope someone finds it helpful :)

<span class="user-sig user-Adrian"><i>—{{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} <small>2007-02-27 08:32Z</small></i></span>
:Thanks, might be nice if someone actually un-indef blocks that IP as a result as well :-). <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 08:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

:: What you wanted an actual logical outcome? Silly :x
:: <span class="user-sig user-Adrian"><i>—{{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} <small>2007-02-27 10:49Z</small></i></span>

::: *grumble* if I *wanted* a timestamp the bot would recognize, I would have added one. By updating the in-comment one, I dodged the problem without sacrificing the all-important aesthetics.
::: If you need me, I'll be color-coordinating your signature for you :P
::: <span class="user-sig user-Adrian"><i>—{{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} <small>2007-02-27 11:08Z</small></i></span>
:::: Pardon my trying to help :-). I hadn't noticed the change to the in-comment one. By the way, one of Essjay's Bots archives this page too. Though there are plenty of my timestamps for it to go by in thread. What colour do you think my sig should be anyway... <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 11:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
(outdent) You know I'm kidding ;) I actually like the current shade, although you could always join me in my .sig rebellion and transclude the whole thing. *just got done explaining why it's not going to topple Misplaced Pages, for the 29th time ...* That's the problem when policy makers try to legislate solutions to nonexistent problems -- the technical aspects of the system (whether transclusion causes load {no, transclusions are rendered when changed rather than on-load}) are best left to developers. And under normal circumstances, you couldn't transclude your .sig even if you wanted to ... policy overlapping an existing technical solution.

<span class="user-sig user-Adrian"><i>—{{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} <small>2007-02-27 11:30Z</small></i></span>
:I can see the problem where people transclude sigs and don't subst them. But not sure I see any issues beyond that. What does the 'z' stand for in your timestamp anyway? <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 11:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
:: What baseline problems do you see with unsubst'ed sigs (such as yours truly's) ? :)
:: <span class="user-sig user-Adrian"><i>—{{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} <small>2007-02-27 11:40Z</small></i></span>
:::LOL. I'd always thought yours was substituted... Just seen I'm wrong. OK, I'm actually going to shut up now. You know a lot more about this than I do ;-) .... <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 11:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
::::PS. Do you like my (slightly desperate) appeal to ] at Afd? <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 11:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
::::: If you want to watch me slug the whole thing out ''yet again'', you can check out thread :x
::::: <span class="user-sig user-Adrian"><i>—{{User:Adrian/zap2.js}} <small>2007-02-27 11:52Z</small></i></span>

==''Signpost'' updated for February 26th, 2007.==

{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;"
! ]<font style="position: relative; top: .3em; font-size: 250%;">'''Weekly Delivery'''</font>
|}
<br>
{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;"
|-
| colspan=3 |
----
|-
| align="left" | '''Volume 3, Issue 9''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']'''
|-
| colspan=3 align=center |
----
|}
{| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% style="background-color:transparent;"
| width=50% | ]
| width=50% | ]
|-
| width=50% | ]
| width=50% | ]
|-
| width=50% | ]
| width=50% | ]
|-
| width=50% | ]
| width=50% | ]
|-
| width=50% | ]
| width=50% |
|}

{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;"
| colspan=2 |
----
|-
| align="left" | ''']''' &nbsp;|&nbsp; ] &nbsp;|&nbsp; ] &nbsp;|&nbsp; ] &nbsp;|&nbsp; ]
| align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small>
|-
| colspan=2 |
----
|}
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 08:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

== Re: Possible username prob ==

Hmm, fair enough. It's only come up once before (somebody wanted ]), and we just settled it on ]. IIRC, we mentioned the discussion under the request itself; I don't recall if we linked it from ]. Not sure about the best course of action for resolving these -- I figure taking care of it on WT:CHU/U keeps a (longer-lasting) record the bcrats can easily find and take into consideration, linking it from WP:RFC/N encourages community input. Not sure how well it'll scale, but so long as we only run into these every so often, it seeeeeems like it might be the way to go? If you have any suggestions, feel free -- as I said, this would only be the second time it's come up. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 09:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
:I'll take care of the CHU/U side, if you'll take RFC/N? :) &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 09:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

I'm afraid I messed up big time. I confused this kid with the ]. Sorry.
I've striked out my AFD comment. - ]|] 12:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
:No prob- easily done. I only came across this article because it mentioned in a post at ]. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 12:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

==I posted it to ANI==

But when are you gonna get the fuckin' shiny buttons, hon????? ] 13:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm home if you want to chit-chat. On IRC my name is Amsterdad, on Skype my name is KingCranky. Let me know if you A) have the time; B) have the inclination; and C)which chat format you want to use. Got some great news, by the way: my book project, which was stalled, is back on track after 4 months of trying and failing to track somebody down for a series of interviews. I have one book in me and it looks like it is going to emerge. Joy! ] 17:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm on undernet, not in any channel. With my username you can type directly to me. Alternatively, we can use gmail (you have that addy now) or yahoo (trex132). As to the ANI thing, I am going through contributions as we speak/type. ] 17:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
:Gmail it is, then, Hit me up when you get the chance. I am working on my second article from that ANI page now. ] 17:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


==Barnstar Hurdles==

Hi, WjB - I've appreciated your comments over at ]. As you may have seen from my links on that page, I've been sort of shoved into taking point on getting the ] approved (as opposed to making changes to the current Editor's Barnstar). Have you gone through the barnstar approval process before? This is my first time and I'm actually rather unclear how much support we need to get a go for a new barnstar, or even for an Other-Related Award. The first run-through was rather abruptly (and, imho, inappropriately/prematurely) archived by Evrik, so we've re-proposed it. It's once again getting strong support, but I'm really unclear on how much is enough. Any thoughts or pointers? <font face="Georgia">] ]<font color="navy">♦</font>]</font> 04:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:41, 31 December 2024

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.


Thank you and a farewell note

I wanted to say a huge thank you not only to those who have posted supportive messages here and elsewhere, but also to those who have posted criticisms of my actions. It has been a pleasure editing this project alongside each and every one of you, whether we have agreed or not. I hope that those whose advice I have not felt able to follow over the last couple of weeks do think it fell on deaf ears. I have read every word and listened carefully.

Some have suggested that my recent actions have been out of character. I think that overlooks some of my history on this project. I have always believed more in principles than rules. Some may remember my unblock of Giano during the 2008 ArbCom elections, others my staunch objection to the existence of an off-wiki bureaucrat mailing list, or indeed my strong opposition to certain resysop decisions at WP:BN that I felt ran contrary to the best interests of the project. It is probably true to say that I have been one of the most "activist" / "interventionist" bureaucrats. Whether that is a good or bad thing I leave to the judgment of others, but I make no apology for it.

Harassment is a serious issue, and one that has affected me personally in my time editing the project. I have never spoken publicly about the full reasons for my withdrawal from the 2008 ArbCom elections. I did so due to threats I received that actions would be taken against me in the real world to embarrass me and my then employer. I had recently started a new position and was relatively junior, so that was a threat that I could not ignore. I withdrew from the elections and resigned as an admin and bureaucrat. Some months later, when I felt more secure and established at work, I resumed service as an admin and bureaucrat. It has been a matter of great sadness to me to see some suggest that I don't take the issue of harassment seriously or that recent actions by me are supportive of harassment. That is not the case, and I caution people against being overly quick to accept unquestioningly a narrative that has been presented to them. The WMF account of its actions in relation to Fram does not withstand the most cursory scrutiny - it should be treated with utmost suspicion.

There are two very serious problems facing the community at the moment, and neither ought to be allowed to eclipse the other:

  1. WMF v community self-governance. There is an urgent need to clarify the extent to which WMF is required to defer to community consensus, and the extent to which it must explain its actions and be held accountable for them by local communities. Without this, the project will hemorrhage contributors. Absent sufficient autonomy, wikipedia will simply not be the project that many of us chose to give our time to. The number of staffers would need to rise exponentially to fill the gap. I suggest WMF think long and hard about the value to them of the volunteer time they benefit from.
  2. Fair process in WMF actions. In all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, the accused must have basic rights. Those include the right to know the name of their accuser(s), to understand what they are accused of, and to have the opportunity to defend themselves. The accused must also have the right for any public statement about them to clearly identify the misconduct that they were found to have committed, rather than to be subject to vague insinuations and innuendo thrown about from those who claim to speak from a position of authority. Fram has been treated abysmally. The decision of two of my fellow bureaucrats to re-enact a punishment applied by WMF with no respect for basic concepts of fairness was the last straw in convincing me that I could not continue here.

I would remind everyone that over the last few years I been minimally active on the project, with little time to dedicate to it. Everyone will be fine without me. I also think that it is time for this project to stop relying on old hands in key positions. ArbCom is increasingly comprised of re-elected former Arbs, many bureaucrats (including me) were elected over a decade ago. That's not a good thing. We need fresh blood in key roles.

I hope that matters are resolved in relation to the two issues that I have identified above such that in future I will feel able to continue contributing to this project, but my days as a bureaucrat or administrator are done. WJBscribe (talk) 11:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Replies to this message and further discussion have been archived

Precious anniversary

Precious
Six years!

miss you - see Die Fliege (the fly) on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

... so delighted to read your measured comments again, "old" crat ;) - February flowers - late Valentine, read Alte Liebe and enjoy Handel's birthday! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Three years ago? Yikes.

On the off chance you still look in from time to time, I saw something that reminded me of something else which in turn reminded me of Framgate, and I'm amazed to see that it all started 3 years ago yesterday. It feels so much more recent. While thinking back on everything, I still don't regret a lot, but I do regret my part in your resignation and retirement. I imagine it was like 95% WMF's fault and 5% mine, but I regret that 5%. Hope you're well, and thanks for caring so much about the integrity of the project. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

You two are forever my heroes for your actions then. Folly Mox (talk) 03:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

@Floquenbeam: It does feel both like a very long time ago and in another way just yesterday. I think even 5% is beating yourself up too much. I don't think events would have played out differently if you hadn't asked for your bits back at the noticeboard; I couldn't have watched things play out from the sidelines. In the end, the result would still have been the same, there wouldn't have been enough support for the actions I took (esp. re: Fram) and my position would have still have ended up untenable.
Ultimately, it's not because I resigned the bits that I don't contribute any more, I miss everyone and care for the project, but I don't want to give valuable free labour to WMF. I was comfortable contributing to a community-run project advancing free knowledge that was largely self-governing save for the minimal legally required role that WMF originally had (and Jimbo's increasingly shrinking founder role). And I was happy to give my time to that project. But increasingly the projects are now run by WMF, which sees itself as having a governance role over a social movement. The goal of trying (perhaps in vain) to build a NPOV online encyclopaedia that was free to all was alluring. This is depressing (it's like they didn't realise WP:PILLARS existed).
The community has failed to stand up to WMF and has tacitly endorsed its every encroaching remit. More of those who have stayed, and those who joined recently, believe that WMF are in charge. They liken WMF to Facebook without understanding how Misplaced Pages is (was?) different. I feel that Facebook provides a service to its users whereas WMF receives services from the community. But it seems people don't see it that way. That's fine, I get it. From my point of view though, the battle for self-governance we won with Jimbo was then lost to WMF, which whittled it away a piece at a time. WMF forces through policies and tech features that no one wants, while ignoring the features that the community asks for and the bugs it's crying out to have fixed (e.g. Misplaced Pages:Mobile communication bugs). WMF now attempt to set the agenda, rather than responding to wishes of the projects. WMF even dictates where and how discussions happen, eschewing the noticeboards and consensus building structures we set up. People seem to be grudgingly accepting that. I couldn't and still can't. The result is that I don't want to give my time here any more, however tempting. WJBscribe (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Yes, I still see echoes of this in the recent UCoC enforcement vote (and many other issues too, but that's foremost in my head). Good to hear from you. Take care. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Well, it seems you have nudged me slightly out of my self exile. I have at least commented on the current RfBs. I do look in from time to time. It may be that the community / WMF balance will improve with time. One can only hope... WJBscribe (talk) 11:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, only people who support the WMF unconditionally are allowed to oppose RFB candidates. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Calendar emojiHappy First Edit Day!
Hi WJBscribe! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU 21:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Party popper emoji

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

Best wishes for what you do with your time, - miss you here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

You are missed

Thank you again for both your actions and your articulation of the danger to the project posed by the WMF. I greatly respect your decision to leave, but it's a sad loss. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

@Yngvadottir: Thank you, and I greatly appreciate your inclusion of "This edit is not an endorsement of the WMF" in your edit summaries. Were I to be minded to make any further edits in future, I would definitely adopt that! WJBscribe (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Let me second the sentiment that you are missed. It's hard to believe it's been five years since all that went down. I'm sorry things shook out like they did, but your principled stand was noticed by many. 28bytes (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

I will also add that you are definitely missed. I'm damn happy that I got to know you while you were here; I'm one of the lucky users that had this privilege. ~Oshwah~ 04:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Me, too! Andre🚐 04:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

In light of some recent events, I went ahead and read back through some of the Fram situation (one that occurred before my time actively editing). I think Misplaced Pages would be well-served by more bureaucrats and administrators like you were at that time. Thank you for your service. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)