Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:04, 28 February 2007 editAftli (talk | contribs)53 edits →Candidate pages← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022 edit undoDwaipayanc (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,440 editsm Reverted edits by 5.245.241.17 (talk) to last version by Ed6767Tag: Rollback 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|historical document}}
{{shortcut|]<br>]}}
{{selfref|WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for ] (formerly WP:RFCU) or for ] (])}}
This process is for discussing specific users who have violated ]. In order to request comments on a user's actions, follow the instructions to create a subpage in the section below. Disputes over the writing of articles, including disputes over how best to follow the ] policy, belong in ].
{{historical|type=woundup|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of ].'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.|brief=yes}}
{{info|Prior to ] at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014.


Old RfC/Us can be found in ].
==Uncertified user RfCs==
}}
Requests for comment which do not meet the minimum requirements 48 hours after creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed. See ] for the minimum requirements. The subject RFC page will also be deleted, unless the subject has explicitly requested it to be retained.

==Closing and archiving==
Disputes may be removed from this page and archived under any of the following circumstances:
# If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
# The parties to the dispute agree.
# The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.
Remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at ''']'''. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

==General user conduct==
Discussions about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges or the choice of username. To list a user conduct dispute, please create a subpage using ] as a template, and then list it as follows:

;]
:{''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> (note: that is five tildes, not four, RFCs are signed with the date only, not your username)

<inputbox>
type=create
preload=Template:RfCsubst
default=Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/USERNAME
buttonlabel=User conduct
bgcolor=#eeeeff
width=50
</inputbox>

===Candidate pages===
These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

===Approved pages===
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

;]
:], ], ], ], ]. 02:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Unstoppable stalking, uncivilty, intimidation and harassing. ], ], ] 18:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:], ], ], ] and potentially ].17:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:] has been committing persistent personal attacks for a long time, along with other disruptive behaviour such as violation of 3RR rule and vandalism. 23:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Persistent ] violations 14:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
:Also ] and ] violations. 21:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Has falsely accused an editor of harassment and wikistalking, is disruptive, and refuses to accept fair use policy. 00:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:User-talk page incivility, treating content disputes as vandalism.

;]
: This RFC did not appear to be listed. Claims of wikistalking and deceptive and disruptive behavior. To do with listing images as Replacable Fair Use.

;]
:Abuse of user page as a political soapbox, inflammatory username. 14:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Abuse of user page as a political soapbox, inflammatory username, image abuse. 13:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:], ], ], ] violations 22:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Abortive second go-around after failed refactoring: Issues of civility, talk page obfuscation, and providing sources. - 07:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Incivility, personal attacks, failure to assume good faith. 08:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Incivility, personal attacks, accusations of sockpuppetry on both sides, harassment. - 18:07 4 February 2007 (UTC)

;''']'''
:3RR, Sock, personal attacks, etc. concerning the political issues of naming convention with Taiwan/ROC. 02:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

;''']'''
:], ], other issues. 23:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:], ], ], ] 15:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:], ], ] 11:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

;]
:], ], ], and ]

;]
:], ], ] violations 21:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

== Use of administrator privileges ==
This section is only for discussions specifically related to the use of sysop rights by ]. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, and blocking or unblocking users. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the '''General user conduct''' section above. To list a dispute, create a subpage using the following sample as a template:

;]
:Allegations: {''one or two'' short sentences giving the dry facts} <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>

As with disputes over general user conduct, '''at least two people''' must certify that they believe there is a legitimate basis for the complaint. If the listing is not certified within 48 hours of listing, it will be deleted.

===Candidate pages===
These RfCs still need to meet the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
;]
Allegations: This overzealous administrator has inappropriately used his privileges in editorial conflicts to win "edit wars" against an entire population of Wikipedians who, on the talk page, widely agree with said edits, most notably on the ] entry. The user has blocked articles from being edited indiscriminately and inappropriately. There are many comments from other users relating to such situations on their ]. ] 05:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Allegations: Use of ] and understanding of ] 02:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

===Approved pages===
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.

;]
:Allegations: understanding of ] and application of ] (self nom)--]<sup>g</sup> 11:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Allegations: Abuse of Admin powers, disregarding other Admin comments, abusive language, re ] and ] and incivility towards ] and ]. 03:13, February 22, 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Allegations: Abuse of DRV closure during an ongoing debate. 20:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

;].
:Allegations: Irregularities in AfD closes. (Moved from original request at ]) 23:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Allegations: ] has inappropriately used his administrative privileges in editorial conflicts, blocking users indiscriminately and inappropriately (and later being compelled to unblock said editors). 15:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

;]
:Allegations: Trödel took personal offense at my request that he cite his sources for a statement he made, and subsequently forbid me from discussing anything with him, illegimately blocked me for a threat that I never made, and has been keeping a vulture-eye on my edit history even though he agreed not to in an ANI I previously filed seeking protection from him. 05:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)



]

Latest revision as of 04:08, 25 July 2022

historical document WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations (formerly WP:RFCU) or for Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names (WP:RFC/NAME)
This page has been closed down by community consensus, and is retained only for historical reference.
If you wish to restart discussion on the status of this page, seek community input at a forum such as the village pump.
The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion.
Other dispute resolution processes should be used for conduct issues.
Prior to a discussion at the Village Pump that was closed in December 2014, requests for comment on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the dispute resolution process. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. Old RfC/Us can be found in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive.
Category: