| Revision as of 21:19, 14 October 2022 editBlanchey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,774 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2022: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:40, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,091 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
| (22 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=30|archive_units=days|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Soap Operas|class=c}} |
|
{{WikiProject Soap Operas}} |
|
{{WikiProject Television|class=C|importance=High|british-television=yes|british-television-importance=top|emmerdale=yes|emmerdale-importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Television|importance=High|british-television=yes|british-television-importance=top|emmerdale=yes|emmerdale-importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject England|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject England|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Yorkshire|class=C|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Yorkshire|importance=High}} |
|
⚫ |
}}{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
| Line 14: |
Line 13: |
|
|archive =Talk:Emmerdale/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive =Talk:Emmerdale/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Nicola wheeler/Nicola King updates == |
|
|
|
|
|
Nicola Wheeler/ Nicola king is the second longest serving female cast member. She joined in 2001 but quit in Jan 2006. However she returned 18 months later and despite taking maternity leave in 2015 she has remained in the role since. She has currently been in the role for 20 years. This needs to be updated and added to the longest serving cast members of Emmerdale page please. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Laurel update == |
|
|
|
|
|
Laurel update needed she has been in the show 20 years now. Please can this be added to longest serving section. ] (]) 02:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The last place on the table is 21 years, so once she gets to that, I'll add her. – ] • 09:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Incorrect she should be added as she has now been in Emmerdale 20 years ] (]) 01:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Not acceptable to wait until she has been in it for 21 years just because the last number is 21. There is no point in having a longest serving cast member list if a cast member doesnt match the last in the list. Chaz has almost reached 20 years so do we have to wait for 21 years again? ] (]) 01:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Also 20 years is a huge milestone especially in a soap. Just because the last character in the list is 21 years is irrelevant.laurel has been in Emmerdale for 20 years which is a massive milestone. ] (]) 03:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2022 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Emmerdale|answered=no}} |
|
|
Can somebody remove the unsourced material from the Families section in the Setting and Characters category? If the text is to stay, can somebody else add some sources to back up the information as per Misplaced Pages rules? ] (]) 15:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Hi again, 87. Hope you are well. I will have a look for you in a while. :) ] (]) 19:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Horror?== |
|
::{{Ping|Meena|JuneGloom07|Soaper1234|Raintheone}} pinging a few soap editors. What are your thoughts on this? I read through the section the user above was referring to and there were only 2 sources I believe. Should all the other information be removed (and can be added back if someone wants to back it up with sources)? Also, hope you are all well. ] (]) 20:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::I'm fine thank you. I think there are three unsourced material notices in that section. The ones that say citation needed.] (]) 20:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
IMDb says this is horror. I have never seen the show, but I don't get that impression from the article. The fact that it keeps popping up under horror made me think it's a British Dark Shadows or something. --] (]) 07:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::It certainly would be more favourable to find a source instead of removing it, as that is the whole point in Misplaced Pages! However, I don’t know where to look nor have much time either. If you felt up to it, you could always have a look and drop the links on here? The other thing, recently, a lot of emmerdale articles have had a major cleanup of lots of content known as ], which in other words is information which only concerns a very small number of people, not something most readers would need to know, and that information is better for Emmerdale Wiki on Fandom. I’d argue that a lot of this may be fancruft (particularly the newer information) so that is another reason it could be removed… ] (]) 21:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
IMDb says this is horror. I have never seen the show, but I don't get that impression from the article. The fact that it keeps popping up under horror made me think it's a British Dark Shadows or something. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 07:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
