Revision as of 01:34, 24 October 2022 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,969 edits FASA award← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:47, 31 December 2024 edit undoParadoctor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers33,686 editsm →WP:MAJORWORK vs. WP:MINORWORK: fix | ||
(44 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header |
{{Talk header}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| | |||
{{Outline of knowledge coverage|poetry}} | |||
{{WikiProject Poetry}} | |||
{{WPPoetry|class=NA}} | |||
}} | |||
{{shortcut|WT:POETRY}} | {{shortcut|WT:POETRY}} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Poetry/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Poetry/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Connected contributor (paid) | |||
|User1 = Noah Hickman | U1-employer = BYU|U1-EH=yes|U1-otherlinks=COI declarations ]}} | |||
== Disclosed COI == | |||
Hi! I work for the BYU Library, and I'll be working on pages affiliated with this project. Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns! ] (]) 23:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Duino Elegies Featured article review == | |||
I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 22:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Wikiproject == | |||
== A Song for Simeon Featured article review == | |||
I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 01:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
Would anyone be interested in joining a sub project of ] on ]? WP's coverage of this is quite poor atm imo ] (]) 17:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Poets Laureate cleanup == | |||
==Dispute at Wenn ich ein Vöglein wär== | |||
Hi, I have been working on cleanup of both the ] and ] articles--both of which were badly out of date. I am currently creating individual list articles for those states that have had more than one poet laureate representing them, and linking back to those articles under the state subheadings, as well creating that link the individual poets laureate together. Others are certainly welcome to join in creating either the state pages or the navboxes. So far this is about 50% done. | |||
The article ] was recently created by ], and I thank them for that. However, the (unsourced) translation is an utter misrepresentation of the German text. The mistranslation of {{lang|de|Wenn}} to 'When' is what caught my eye first. On closer reading, their English text has often no equivalent in the German. I gave more details at ]. | |||
While correcting the translation, I also made more that half a dozen other improvements – some quite substantial – as described in my edit summaries. Tamtam90 reverted them all, twice. I would welcome the input of other editors in this matter. -- ] (]) 00:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
While doing this I've also noticed many different poets laureate articles linked in these navboxes could potentially use some improvement as they have been tagged for things like bibliography, inline citations, and external links clean up. Many of these state poets laureate also do not even have an article despite their title making them notable. This is a huge undertaking though. ] (]) 17:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Disputes on article for "]" == | |||
:Okay, this is done. Every state (except Massachusetts which has no program, and Arizona and Pennsylvania which have only had one laureate) now has an article and an a navigational box for poets laureate that links them all together. ] (]) 13:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
There are several disputes for the professor and poet ]. See the ] and ] if you want to catch up. There is a possible COI editor who is possibly very close to the subject and is very heated on the talk pages. They have repeatedly stated the involved editors do not know what we are talking about when it comes to editing articles for poets and authors, so I'm reaching out here and on ] to address this concern of theirs. Please take a look if interested and feel free to add to conversation/consensus. ] <sup> (]) </sup> 17:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Requested move at ] == | |||
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 05:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
==Informal discussion== | |||
== Wong Phui Nam == | |||
An informal discussion of article issues, a ], has been initiated at ] | |||
== WP:MAJORWORK vs. WP:MINORWORK == | |||
Hello, I have recently expanded the article ], which while not tagged I believe would fit within this Wikiproject. I would be grateful for any edits or input from those more familiar about writing about poets in an encyclopaedic style. Best, ] (]) 16:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
A difference of opinion about which applies arose for me recently, and MOS is not particularly helpful there. | |||
==Whack!== | |||
* ]: {{tq|short}}, example has 16 lines | |||
{{Multitrout|For the state of the page ], as noted at ]|sig=] (]) 13:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)}} | |||
* ]: {{tq|long or epic}}, example has 10000+ lines | |||
:This project has been mostly inactive for about a decade now. Good luck with your fish. --] (]) 16:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
So, what about poems with 17 to 9999 lines? Where do you draw the line, or where do you place the grey area between long and short? | |||
For comparison, the Eminem song "]" (208 lines) and Don McLean's "]" (117 lines) are both minor works. | |||
== Featured Article Save Award for ] == | |||
According to {{ping|Bkonrad}}, Auden's ] (104 lines) is a major work, which I do not see. <span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(-3deg);bottom:-.1em;">]</span> (]) 16:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
There is a ] nomination at ]. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. ] (]) 01:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
:For the record, I don't care all that much, but the disambiguation entry should match however the article on ] is styled. Since it was initially published as a standalone booklet, I'd be inclined to treat it as a major work. ] ≠ ] 16:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Also, until Paradoctor's post above, I was unaware of the poem's length. I only saw there was a style discrepancy between the disambiguation page entry and the article. I defaulted to what was used in the article's style, largely based on seeing it had been a standalone publication. But it could well be that the article should be updated. ] ≠ ] 17:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I like your new sig. <span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(-3deg);bottom:-.1em;">]</span> (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Typically the secondary sources will have some kind of consensus, so I look for that (simpler than hoping to find a rule that is always accurate!). I also tend to find standalone publications (like booklets) are more often treated as “major” than parts of works (like poems within a collection or songs within an album), and format has a bigger impact than the raw number of lines. ] (]) 22:03, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: {{tq|secondary sources}} I'd really be surprised if the sources were a) consistent with each other, b) aligned with our purpose of distinguishing "minor" and "major" works. Maybe more to the point, I suspect most sources will use "major" and "minor" as descriptors of impact, not of length, which is what MOS uses as criterion. I don't think sources will work for us there. "American Pie" is certainly not a minor work in McLean's discography. | |||
:: Same issue with publication context/format. MOS doesn't mention it. | |||
:: {{tq|simpler than hoping to find a rule that is always accurate}} Good thing, then, that I didn't ask for that, wouldn't you say? <span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(-3deg);bottom:-.1em;">]</span> (]) 22:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: It would be good to have some definition like the film industry provides. ] defines a short film as having a run time of no more than 40 minutes. The Canadians use a different definition, but that needn't worry us, we can use and mention these definitions as context would have us. Maybe ] or some publisher's association promulgates a definition of "short poem"? For prose, I dimly recall reading a definition that distinguishes between short story, novelette, novella, and novel in terms of word count. |
Latest revision as of 22:47, 31 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Poetry and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Disclosed COI
Hi! I work for the BYU Library, and I'll be working on pages affiliated with this project. Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns! Noah Hickman (talk) 23:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikiproject
Would anyone be interested in joining a sub project of WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? WP's coverage of this is quite poor atm imo Kowal2701 (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Dispute at Wenn ich ein Vöglein wär
The article Wenn ich ein Vöglein wär was recently created by User:Tamtam90, and I thank them for that. However, the (unsourced) translation is an utter misrepresentation of the German text. The mistranslation of Wenn to 'When' is what caught my eye first. On closer reading, their English text has often no equivalent in the German. I gave more details at Talk:Wenn ich ein Vöglein wär#Disputed translation.
While correcting the translation, I also made more that half a dozen other improvements – some quite substantial – as described in my edit summaries. Tamtam90 reverted them all, twice. I would welcome the input of other editors in this matter. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Disputes on article for "Barrett Watten"
There are several disputes for the professor and poet Barrett Watten. See the Talk:Barrett Watten and Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Question_about_a_professor's_article if you want to catch up. There is a possible COI editor who is possibly very close to the subject and is very heated on the talk pages. They have repeatedly stated the involved editors do not know what we are talking about when it comes to editing articles for poets and authors, so I'm reaching out here and on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment to address this concern of theirs. Please take a look if interested and feel free to add to conversation/consensus. GeogSage 17:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Informal discussion
An informal discussion of article issues, a "Before opening a reassessment", has been initiated at Talk:Dylan Thomas#Article issues and classification
WP:MAJORWORK vs. WP:MINORWORK
A difference of opinion about which applies arose for me recently, and MOS is not particularly helpful there.
- MOS:MINORWORK:
short
, example has 16 lines - MOS:MAJORWORK:
long or epic
, example has 10000+ lines
So, what about poems with 17 to 9999 lines? Where do you draw the line, or where do you place the grey area between long and short?
For comparison, the Eminem song "Rap God" (208 lines) and Don McLean's "American Pie" (117 lines) are both minor works. According to @Bkonrad:, Auden's Spain (104 lines) is a major work, which I do not see. Paradoctor (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, I don't care all that much, but the disambiguation entry should match however the article on Spain (poem) is styled. Since it was initially published as a standalone booklet, I'd be inclined to treat it as a major work. older ≠ wiser 16:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, until Paradoctor's post above, I was unaware of the poem's length. I only saw there was a style discrepancy between the disambiguation page entry and the article. I defaulted to what was used in the article's style, largely based on seeing it had been a standalone publication. But it could well be that the article should be updated. older ≠ wiser 17:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I like your new sig. Paradoctor (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, until Paradoctor's post above, I was unaware of the poem's length. I only saw there was a style discrepancy between the disambiguation page entry and the article. I defaulted to what was used in the article's style, largely based on seeing it had been a standalone publication. But it could well be that the article should be updated. older ≠ wiser 17:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Typically the secondary sources will have some kind of consensus, so I look for that (simpler than hoping to find a rule that is always accurate!). I also tend to find standalone publications (like booklets) are more often treated as “major” than parts of works (like poems within a collection or songs within an album), and format has a bigger impact than the raw number of lines. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:03, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
secondary sources
I'd really be surprised if the sources were a) consistent with each other, b) aligned with our purpose of distinguishing "minor" and "major" works. Maybe more to the point, I suspect most sources will use "major" and "minor" as descriptors of impact, not of length, which is what MOS uses as criterion. I don't think sources will work for us there. "American Pie" is certainly not a minor work in McLean's discography.- Same issue with publication context/format. MOS doesn't mention it.
simpler than hoping to find a rule that is always accurate
Good thing, then, that I didn't ask for that, wouldn't you say? Paradoctor (talk) 22:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)- It would be good to have some definition like the film industry provides. AMPAS defines a short film as having a run time of no more than 40 minutes. The Canadians use a different definition, but that needn't worry us, we can use and mention these definitions as context would have us. Maybe PEN International or some publisher's association promulgates a definition of "short poem"? For prose, I dimly recall reading a definition that distinguishes between short story, novelette, novella, and novel in terms of word count.