Revision as of 16:47, 29 December 2022 editMB (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers341,678 edits can't have future dates in as of template← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:35, 23 October 2024 edit undoTanviita (talk | contribs)2 editsm →top: Fixed typoTags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App select source | ||
(33 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Intergovernmental organization}} | {{short description|Intergovernmental organization}} | ||
{{use list-defined references|date=December 2022}} | {{use list-defined references|date=December 2022}} | ||
{{Use |
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} | ||
{{Infobox Geopolitical organization | {{Infobox Geopolitical organization | ||
|conventional_long_name = International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | | conventional_long_name = International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | ||
|native_name = {{native name|fr|Tribunal international du droit de la mer|fontsize=68%}} | | native_name = {{native name|fr|Tribunal international du droit de la mer|fontsize=68%}} | ||
|linking_name = the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | | linking_name = the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | ||
|symbol_type = Official logo | | symbol_type = Official logo | ||
|image_symbol = ITLOS logo.svg | | image_symbol = ITLOS logo.svg | ||
|symbol_width = 150px | | symbol_width = 150px | ||
|map_width = 240px | | map_width = 240px | ||
|map_caption = <div style="white-space:nowrap;"> | | map_caption = <div style="white-space:nowrap;"> | ||
{{unbulleted list | {{unbulleted list | ||
| Dark blue: States with judges in the ITLOS | | Dark blue: States with judges in the ITLOS | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
}} | }} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
|org_type = | | org_type = | ||
|membership_type = Judges from | | membership_type = Judges from | ||
|membership = 21 nations | | membership = 21 nations | ||
|admin_center_type = |
| admin_center_type = Location | ||
|admin_center = {{nowrap|{{flagicon|Germany}} ], ]}} | | admin_center = {{nowrap|{{flagicon|Germany}} ], ]}} | ||
|languages_type = ]s | | languages_type = ]s | ||
|languages = {{unbulleted list |English|]}} | | languages = {{unbulleted list |]|]}} | ||
|leader_title1 = President | | leader_title1 = President | ||
|leader_name1 = {{flagicon| |
| leader_name1 = {{flagicon|Iceland}} Judge Tomas Heidar | ||
|leader_title2 = Vice President | | leader_title2 = Vice President | ||
|leader_name2 = {{flagicon| |
| leader_name2 = {{flagicon|India}} Judge Neeru Chadha | ||
|established_event1 = {{nowrap|] adopted}} | | established_event1 = {{nowrap|] adopted}} | ||
|established_date1 |
| established_date1 = 10 December 1982 | ||
|established_event2 = UNCLOS in force | | established_event2 = UNCLOS in force | ||
|established_date2 |
| established_date2 = 16 November 1994 | ||
|official_website = |
| official_website = https://www.itlos.org/ | ||
}} | }} | ||
], close to the River ]]] | ], close to the River ]]] | ||
The '''International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea''' ('''ITLOS''') is an ] created by the mandate of the ]. It was established by the ], signed at ], on December 10, 1982. The Convention entered into force on November 16, 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four ] listed in Article |
The '''International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea''' ('''ITLOS''') is an ] created by the mandate of the ]. It was established by the ], signed at ], on December 10, 1982. The Convention entered into force on November 16, 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four ] listed in Article 287 of the UNCLOS.<ref name="best"/> Although the Tribunal was established by a United Nations convention, it is not an "organ" of the United Nations. Even so, it maintains close links with the United Nations and in 1997 the Tribunal concluded an Agreement on Cooperation and Relationship between the United Nations and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, which establishes a mechanism for cooperation between the two institutions.<ref>{{Cite web |title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Relationship with the United Nations |url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/the-tribunal/relationship-with-the-united-nations/ |access-date=2023-05-25 |website=ITLOS}}</ref> | ||
The Tribunal is based in ], Germany. The Convention also established the ], with responsibility for the regulation of ] beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. |
The Tribunal is based in ], Germany. The Convention also established the ], with responsibility for the regulation of ] beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. As of July 2024, there are currently 157 signatories, 169 States plus the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=United Nations Treaty Collection |url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en#1 |access-date=2024-07-29 |website=treaties.un.org |language=EN}}</ref> {{As of|December 2022}}, holdouts included the ]<ref name="hf" /> and ].<ref name="tw"/> | ||
==Composition== | ==Composition== | ||
According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an ] geographical representation".<ref name="gr" /> | According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an ] geographical representation".<ref name="gr" /> | ||
At the request of ] and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of five judges to deal with the ''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community)''. | At the request of ] and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of five judges to deal with the ''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community)''.{{fact|date=December 2022}} | ||
By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of five judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire)''. | By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of five judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire)''.{{fact|date=December 2022}} | ||
By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber of seven permanent judges and two ''ad hoc'' judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)''.<ref name="pr" /> | By agreement of the parties ] and ], the Tribunal formed a special chamber of seven permanent judges and two ''ad hoc'' judges to deal with the ''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)''.<ref name="pr" /> | ||
==Seats== | ==Seats== | ||
Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany<ref name="itlos" /> or in Singapore.<ref name="singapore" /><ref name="disputes" /> | Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in ]<ref name="itlos" /> or in ].<ref name="singapore" /><ref name="disputes" /> So far, no case has been heard outside Germany.<ref>{{Cite web |title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat |url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/general-information/seat-of-the-tribunal/ |access-date=2024-07-29 |website=www.itlos.org}}</ref> | ||
==Current judges== | ==Current judges== | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
!scope="col"|Vice president | !scope="col"|Vice president | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon| |
|{{flagicon|Cabo Verde}} ] | ||
|scope="row"|] | |scope="row"|] | ||
|1999 | |1999 | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|Japan}} ] | |{{flagicon|Japan}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] || |
|scope="row"| ] ||2023 || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon| |
|{{flagicon|Sierra Leone}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] || |
|scope="row"| ] ||2023 |||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|South Africa}} ] | |{{flagicon|South Africa}} ] | ||
|scope="row"|] | |scope="row"|] | ||
|2023 || | |||
⚫ | | |
||
⚫ | | | ||
|2011–2014 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | |{{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] || |
|scope="row"| ] ||2023|| | ||
⚫ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 99: | Line 98: | ||
|scope="row"| ] ||2011 || || | |scope="row"| ] ||2011 || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon| |
|{{flagicon|Argentina}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ]|| |
|scope="row"| ]||2023 || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|Iceland}} ] | |{{flagicon|Iceland}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] ||2014 || || |
|scope="row"| ] ||2014 ||2023–present || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|Paraguay}} ] | |{{flagicon|Paraguay}} ] | ||
Line 109: | Line 108: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|India}} ] | |{{flagicon|India}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] ||2017 || || | |scope="row"| ] ||2017 || ||2023-present | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|Thailand}} ] | |{{flagicon|Thailand}} ] | ||
Line 122: | Line 121: | ||
|{{flagicon|Chile}} ] | |{{flagicon|Chile}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] ||2020 || || | |scope="row"| ] ||2020 || || | ||
⚫ | |-2020–present | ||
⚫ | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|Jamaica}} ] | |{{flagicon|Jamaica}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] ||2020 || || | |scope="row"| ] ||2020 || || | ||
Line 159: | Line 158: | ||
|{{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | |{{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | ||
|scope="row"| ] ||1996 ||2008 | |scope="row"| ] ||1996 ||2008 | ||
⚫ | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|South Korea}} ] | |||
|scope="row"| ] ||2009 ||2023 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flagicon|France}} ] | |{{flagicon|France}} ] | ||
Line 234: | Line 236: | ||
==Cases== | ==Cases== | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" | ||
|+Cases of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | |+Cases of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 247: | Line 249: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|13 November 1997}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|4 December 1997}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 254: | Line 256: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|13 January 1998}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|1 July 1999}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row" rowspan="2" | ''Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases'' | |scope="row" rowspan="2" | '']'' | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|New Zealand}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|New Zealand}} | ||
| rowspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | | rowspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | ||
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts| |
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts|30 July 1999}} | ||
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts| |
| rowspan="2" | {{Dts|27 August 1999}} | ||
| rowspan="2" | Order on provisional measures | | rowspan="2" | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 270: | Line 272: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|17 January 2000}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|7 February 2000}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 277: | Line 279: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Seychelles}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Seychelles}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|27 November 2000}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|18 December 2000}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| {{Sort|Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean|''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean''}} | |scope="row"| {{Sort|Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean|''Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Chile}} / {{Flag|European Union}}{{Efn|group=upper-alpha|The European Union replaced and succeeded the {{Flag|European Economic Community|name=European Community}} as a party to the case on |
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Chile}} / {{Flag|European Union}}{{Efn|group=upper-alpha|The European Union replaced and succeeded the {{Flag|European Economic Community|name=European Community}} as a party to the case on 1 December 2009.}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|19 December 2000}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|16 December 2009}} | ||
| Terminated at request of parties | | Terminated at request of parties | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 290: | Line 292: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Belize}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Belize}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|France}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|21 March 2001}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|20 April 2001}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 297: | Line 299: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Yemen}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Yemen}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|3 July 2001}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|13 July 2001}} | ||
| Terminated at request of parties | | Terminated at request of parties | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| {{Sort|Mox Plant|''The MOX Plant Case''}} | |scope="row"| {{Sort|Mox Plant|'']''}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ireland}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Ireland}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|United Kingdom}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|United Kingdom}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|9 November 2001}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|3 December 2001}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 311: | Line 313: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Australia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Australia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|2 December 2002}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|23 December 2002}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 318: | Line 320: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Malaysia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Malaysia}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Singapore}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Singapore}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|5 September 2003}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|8 October 2003}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 325: | Line 327: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|18 November 2004}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|18 December 2004}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 332: | Line 334: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|6 July 2007}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|6 August 2007}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 339: | Line 341: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Japan}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|6 July 2007}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|6 August 2007}} | ||
| Judgment on prompt release | | Judgment on prompt release | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal''}} | |scope="row"| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Bangladesh}} / {{Flag|Myanmar}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Bangladesh}} / {{Flag|Myanmar}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|14 December 2009}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|14 March 2012}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| ''Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area'' | |scope="row"| ''Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area'' | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | ] | | colspan="2" align="center" | ] | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|14 May 2010}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|1 February 2011}} | ||
| Advisory opinion | | Advisory opinion | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 358: | Line 360: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Spain}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Spain}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|24 November 2010}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|28 May 2013}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| {{Sort|Virginia G|''The M/V "Virginia G" Case''}} | |scope="row"| {{Sort|Virginia G|''The M/V "Virginia G" Case''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} / {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} / {{Flag|Guinea-Bissau}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|4 July 2011}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|14 April 2014}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 371: | Line 373: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Argentina}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Argentina}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|14 November 2012}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|15 December 2012}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)'' | |scope="row"| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)'' | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission | | colspan="2" align="center" | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|28 March 2013}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|2 April 2015}} | ||
| Advisory opinion | | Advisory opinion | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 384: | Line 386: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Kingdom of the Netherlands|name=Netherlands}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Kingdom of the Netherlands|name=Netherlands}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|21 October 2013}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|22 November 2013}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean''}} | |scope="row"| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} / {{Flag|Ivory Coast}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Ghana}} / {{Flag|Ivory Coast}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|3 December 2014}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|23 September 2017}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 397: | Line 399: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|India}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|India}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|21 July 2015}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|24 August 2015}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 404: | Line 406: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Panama}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Italy}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|17 December 2015}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|10 April 2019}} | ||
| Judgment on merits | | Judgment on merits | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 411: | Line 413: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Ukraine}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Ukraine}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Russia}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|16 April 2019}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|25 May 2019}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 418: | Line 420: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Nigeria}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Nigeria}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|21 May 2019}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|6 July 2019}} | ||
| Order on provisional measures | | Order on provisional measures | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean''}} | |scope="row"| {{Sort|Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean|''Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Mauritius}} / {{Flag|Maldives}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Mauritius}} / {{Flag|Maldives}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|24 September 2019}} | ||
| ''Ongoing'' | | ''Ongoing'' | ||
| | | | ||
Line 430: | Line 432: | ||
|scope="row"| {{Sort|San Padre Pio|''The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case''}} | |scope="row"| {{Sort|San Padre Pio|''The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case''}} | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} / {{Flag|Nigeria}} | | colspan="2" align="center" | {{Flag|Switzerland}} / {{Flag|Nigeria}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|17 December 2019}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|29 December 2021}} | ||
| Terminated at request of parties | | Terminated at request of parties | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 437: | Line 439: | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Marshall Islands}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Marshall Islands}} | ||
| align="center" | {{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}} | | align="center" | {{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|10 November 2022}} | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|15 November 2022}} | ||
| Terminated at request of applicant | | Terminated at request of applicant | ||
|- | |- | ||
|scope="row"| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law'' | |scope="row"| ''Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law'' | ||
| colspan="2" align="center" | |
| colspan="2" align="center" | Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | ||
| {{Dts| |
| {{Dts|12 December 2022}} | ||
| 21 May 2024 | |||
⚫ | | |
||
| Advisory Opinion | |||
⚫ | | |
||
|- | |- | ||
|''The M/T "Heroic Idun" (No. 2) Case'' | |||
| colspan="2" align="center" |{{Flag|Marshall Islands}} / {{Flag|Equatorial Guinea}} | |||
|27 April 2023 | |||
⚫ | |''Ongoing'' | ||
⚫ | | | ||
|- | |||
|''The “Zheng He” Case'' | |||
| align="center" |{{Flag|Luxembourg}} | |||
| align="center" |{{Flag|Mexico}} | |||
|3 June 2024 | |||
|''Ongoing'' | |||
| | |||
|} | |} | ||
{{Notelist|group=upper-alpha|close}} | {{Notelist|group=upper-alpha|close}} | ||
Line 453: | Line 467: | ||
{{reflist|refs= | {{reflist|refs= | ||
<ref name="best">{{cite journal |author1=SM Mitchell |author2=EJ Powell |title=Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) |url=http://www.saramitchell.org/pmunclos.pdf |journal=APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper |publisher=American Political Science Association}}</ref> | <ref name="best">{{cite journal |author1=SM Mitchell |author2=EJ Powell |title=Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos) |url=http://www.saramitchell.org/pmunclos.pdf |journal=APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper |publisher=American Political Science Association}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="disputes">{{Cite web|last=Auto|first=Hermes|date=2020-06-11|title=Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement {{!}} The Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/law-of-the-sea-disputes-can-now-be-heard-in-singapore-under-signed-agreement|access-date=2022-02-02|website= |
<ref name="disputes">{{Cite web|last=Auto|first=Hermes|date=2020-06-11|title=Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement {{!}} The Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/law-of-the-sea-disputes-can-now-be-heard-in-singapore-under-signed-agreement|access-date=2022-02-02|website=straitstimes.com|language=en}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="gr">{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/yiel/yvx077|title=3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)|year=2016|last1=García-Revillo|first1=Miguel G.|journal=Yearbook of International Environmental Law|volume=27|pages=424–426}}</ref> | <ref name="gr">{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/yiel/yvx077|title=3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)|year=2016|last1=García-Revillo|first1=Miguel G.|journal=Yearbook of International Environmental Law|volume=27|pages=424–426}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="hf">{{cite news |last=Groves |first=Steven |title=Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits |url=https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |publisher=The Heritage Foundation |date= |
<ref name="hf">{{cite news |last=Groves |first=Steven |title=Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits |url=https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |publisher=The Heritage Foundation |date=12 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314044246/https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/accession-to-un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea |archive-date=14 March 2012}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="itlos">{{Cite web|title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat|url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/general-information/seat-of-the-tribunal/|access-date=2022-02-02|website= |
<ref name="itlos">{{Cite web|title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat|url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/general-information/seat-of-the-tribunal/|access-date=2022-02-02|website=ITLOS}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="pr">{{cite web |url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_293_en.pdf |title=Press release |date= |
<ref name="pr">{{cite web |url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_293_en.pdf |title=Press release |date=27 September 2019 |website=ITLOS |format=PDF|access-date=2020-10-28}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="singapore">{{Cite web|last=ITLOS|title=ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE|url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_303_E.pdf}}</ref> | <ref name="singapore">{{Cite web|last=ITLOS|title=ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE|url=https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/press_releases_english/PR_303_E.pdf}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="tw">{{cite news |title=Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode |url=https://www.tradewindsnews.com/tankers/iran-strikes-in-strait-of-hormuz-as-middle-east-tanker-tensions-explode/2-1-641469 |publisher=Trade Winds |date= |
<ref name="tw">{{cite news |title=Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode |url=https://www.tradewindsnews.com/tankers/iran-strikes-in-strait-of-hormuz-as-middle-east-tanker-tensions-explode/2-1-641469 |publisher=Trade Winds |date=22 July 2019}}</ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 466: | Line 480: | ||
* {{Official}} | * {{Official}} | ||
* | * | ||
* , |
* "", ITLOS | ||
{{Portalbar|Law|Oceans|Politics}} | {{Portalbar|Law|Oceans|Politics}} | ||
Line 479: | Line 493: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 11:35, 23 October 2024
Intergovernmental organization
International Tribunal for the Law of the SeaTribunal international du droit de la mer (French) | |
---|---|
Official logo | |
Location | Hamburg, Germany |
Working languages | |
Judges from | 21 nations |
Leaders | |
• President | Judge Tomas Heidar |
• Vice President | Judge Neeru Chadha |
Establishment | |
• UNCLOS adopted | 10 December 1982 |
• UNCLOS in force | 16 November 1994 |
Website https://www.itlos.org/ |
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) is an intergovernmental organization created by the mandate of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. It was established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, signed at Montego Bay, Jamaica, on December 10, 1982. The Convention entered into force on November 16, 1994, and established an international framework for law over all ocean space, its uses and resources. The ITLOS is one of four dispute resolution mechanisms listed in Article 287 of the UNCLOS. Although the Tribunal was established by a United Nations convention, it is not an "organ" of the United Nations. Even so, it maintains close links with the United Nations and in 1997 the Tribunal concluded an Agreement on Cooperation and Relationship between the United Nations and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, which establishes a mechanism for cooperation between the two institutions.
The Tribunal is based in Hamburg, Germany. The Convention also established the International Seabed Authority, with responsibility for the regulation of seabed mining beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, that is beyond the limits of the territorial sea, the contiguous zone and the continental shelf. As of July 2024, there are currently 157 signatories, 169 States plus the European Union. As of December 2022, holdouts included the United States and Iran.
Composition
According to its founding statute, the Tribunal has a set of 21 judges who serve from a variety of states parties, "according to a method that intends to assure an equitable geographical representation".
At the request of Chile and the European Union, the Tribunal set up a special chamber composed of five judges to deal with the Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Community).
By agreement of the parties Ghana and Ivory Coast, the Tribunal formed a special chamber composed of five judges to deal with the Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire).
By agreement of the parties Mauritius and Maldives, the Tribunal formed a special chamber of seven permanent judges and two ad hoc judges to deal with the Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives).
Seats
Disputes referred to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or one of its chambers can be heard in Germany or in Singapore. So far, no case has been heard outside Germany.
Current judges
Country | Name | Inauguration | President | Vice president |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cabo Verde | José Luís Jesus | 1999 | 2008–2011 | |
Poland | Stanisław Pawlak | 2005 | ||
Japan | Hidehisa Horinouchi | 2023 | ||
Sierra Leone | Osman Keh Kamara | 2023 | ||
South Africa | Thembile Elphus Joyini | 2023 | ||
Algeria | Boualem Bouguetaia | 2008 | 2014–2017 | |
South Korea | Zha Hyoung Rhee | 2023 | ||
Malta | David Attard | 2011 | 2017–2020 | |
Ukraine | Markiyan Kulyk | 2011 | ||
Argentina | Frida Maria Armas Pfirter | 2023 | ||
Iceland | Tomas Heiðar | 2014 | 2023–present | |
Paraguay | Óscar Cabello Sarubbi | 2017 | ||
India | Neeru Chadha | 2017 | 2023-present | |
Thailand | Kriangsak Kittichaisaree | 2017 | ||
Russia | Roman Kolodkin | 2017 | ||
Netherlands | Liesbeth Lijnzaad | 2017 | ||
Chile | María Teresa Infante Caffi | 2020 | ||
Jamaica | Kathy-Ann Brown | 2020 | ||
Italy | Ida Caracciolo | 2020 | ||
Cameroon | Maurice Kamga | 2020 | ||
China | Duan Jielong | 2020 |
Former judges
Cases
Name | Applicant | Respondent | Case began | Case ended | Disposition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The M/V "Saiga" Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Guinea | 13 November 1997 | 4 December 1997 | Judgment on prompt release |
The M/V "Saiga" (No. 2) Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Guinea | 13 January 1998 | 1 July 1999 | Judgment on merits |
Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases | New Zealand | Japan | 30 July 1999 | 27 August 1999 | Order on provisional measures |
Australia | |||||
The "Camouco" Case | Panama | France | 17 January 2000 | 7 February 2000 | Judgment on prompt release |
The "Monte Confurco" Case | Seychelles | France | 27 November 2000 | 18 December 2000 | Judgment on prompt release |
Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean | Chile / European Union | 19 December 2000 | 16 December 2009 | Terminated at request of parties | |
The "Grand Prince" Case | Belize | France | 21 March 2001 | 20 April 2001 | Judgment on prompt release |
The "Chaisiri Reefer 2" Case | Panama | Yemen | 3 July 2001 | 13 July 2001 | Terminated at request of parties |
The MOX Plant Case | Ireland | United Kingdom | 9 November 2001 | 3 December 2001 | Order on provisional measures |
The "Volga" Case | Russia | Australia | 2 December 2002 | 23 December 2002 | Judgment on prompt release |
Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and Around the Straits of Johor | Malaysia | Singapore | 5 September 2003 | 8 October 2003 | Order on provisional measures |
The "Juno Trader" Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Guinea-Bissau | 18 November 2004 | 18 December 2004 | Judgment on prompt release |
The "Hoshinmaru" Case | Japan | Russia | 6 July 2007 | 6 August 2007 | Judgment on prompt release |
The "Tomimaru" Case | Japan | Russia | 6 July 2007 | 6 August 2007 | Judgment on prompt release |
Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal | Bangladesh / Myanmar | 14 December 2009 | 14 March 2012 | Judgment on merits | |
Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area | International Seabed Authority | 14 May 2010 | 1 February 2011 | Advisory opinion | |
The M/V "Louisa" Case | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Spain | 24 November 2010 | 28 May 2013 | Judgment on merits |
The M/V "Virginia G" Case | Panama / Guinea-Bissau | 4 July 2011 | 14 April 2014 | Judgment on merits | |
The "ARA Libertad" Case | Argentina | Ghana | 14 November 2012 | 15 December 2012 | Order on provisional measures |
Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) | Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission | 28 March 2013 | 2 April 2015 | Advisory opinion | |
The "Arctic Sunrise" Case | Netherlands | Russia | 21 October 2013 | 22 November 2013 | Order on provisional measures |
Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean | Ghana / Ivory Coast | 3 December 2014 | 23 September 2017 | Judgment on merits | |
The "Enrica Lexie" Incident | Italy | India | 21 July 2015 | 24 August 2015 | Order on provisional measures |
The M/V "Norstar" Case | Panama | Italy | 17 December 2015 | 10 April 2019 | Judgment on merits |
Case concerning the Detention of Three Ukrainian Naval Vessels | Ukraine | Russia | 16 April 2019 | 25 May 2019 | Order on provisional measures |
The M/T "San Padre Pio" Case | Switzerland | Nigeria | 21 May 2019 | 6 July 2019 | Order on provisional measures |
Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean | Mauritius / Maldives | 24 September 2019 | Ongoing | ||
The M/T "San Padre Pio" (No. 2) Case | Switzerland / Nigeria | 17 December 2019 | 29 December 2021 | Terminated at request of parties | |
The M/T "Heroic Idun" Case | Marshall Islands | Equatorial Guinea | 10 November 2022 | 15 November 2022 | Terminated at request of applicant |
Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law | 12 December 2022 | 21 May 2024 | Advisory Opinion | |
The M/T "Heroic Idun" (No. 2) Case | Marshall Islands / Equatorial Guinea | 27 April 2023 | Ongoing | ||
The “Zheng He” Case | Luxembourg | Mexico | 3 June 2024 | Ongoing |
- The European Union replaced and succeeded the European Community as a party to the case on 1 December 2009.
References
- SM Mitchell; EJ Powell. "Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Conflict Management and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Itlos)" (PDF). APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. American Political Science Association.
- "International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Relationship with the United Nations". ITLOS. Retrieved 25 May 2023.
- "United Nations Treaty Collection". treaties.un.org. Retrieved 29 July 2024.
- Groves, Steven (12 March 2012). "Accession to U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea Would Expose the U.S. to Baseless Climate Change Lawsuits". The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012.
- "Iran strikes in Strait of Hormuz as Middle East tanker tensions explode". Trade Winds. 22 July 2019.
- García-Revillo, Miguel G. (2016). "3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)". Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 27: 424–426. doi:10.1093/yiel/yvx077.
- "Press release" (PDF). ITLOS. 27 September 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
- "International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat". ITLOS. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
- ITLOS. "ITLOS AND SINGAPORE SIGN MODEL AGREEMENT TO ENABLE THE TRIBUNAL TO SIT IN SINGAPORE" (PDF).
- Auto, Hermes (11 June 2020). "Law of the sea disputes can now be heard in Singapore under signed agreement | The Straits Times". straitstimes.com. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
- "International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Seat". www.itlos.org. Retrieved 29 July 2024.
External links
Portals:53°33′04″N 9°51′03″E / 53.55111°N 9.85083°E / 53.55111; 9.85083
Categories: