| Revision as of 11:46, 28 March 2023 editClovermoss (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators30,602 edits →ArbCom case request notification: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:56, 22 December 2024 edit undoDaiopch54 (talk | contribs)5 edits →Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic | ||
| (71 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|date=1 April 2023}} | |||
| {{Archives|bot=MiszaBot III|age=30|auto=no|large=yes}} | {{Archives|bot=MiszaBot III|age=30|auto=no|large=yes}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
| :] | :] | ||
| == Fake Royalties Of India in Misplaced Pages == | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/Chamber_of_Princes). | |||
| ] | |||
| I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 25#Greco-Roman ethnographers}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-family:Segoe Script">]</span><span style="font-size:115%">]</span> 13:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Vinay Jha | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 10:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 20:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == moon user box == | |||
| == Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| The Title and the descriptions are inaccurate , this needs fixing in Wiki and the glottocode as well. ] (]) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| An , could you change the .png file extension to .svg? | |||
| They're smaller, and we don't need the .png any more. | |||
| Thanks. ] (]) 09:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Hello, I’m a bit strapped for time right now but could please reverse your unblock of Andew? Per ], “Except in cases of unambiguous error or significant change in circumstances dealing with the reason for blocking, administrators should avoid unblocking users without first attempting to contact the blocking administrator to discuss the matter.” And I said I would be opposed to any unblock without a topic ban on the talk page. There was an unanswered question from Andew on the talk, I believed your unblock jumped the gun a bit on that discussion. If you do not reverse your block I will take this up in another venue. Thank you, ]] 12:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I am myself strapped for time. Which is a bad excuse when taking actions like this, I hope I can invest some time in this tonight. But when in doubt, if you believe a user absolutely needs to be banned asap to prevent damage to the project, chances are extremely high that you will not be the only admin to think so. Please let us both take a step back from this. In my judgement, you have clearly, blatantly stepped over a line here. If you think that no, it was me who is out of line, let us please leave this to a third, or fourth, or fifth previously uninvolved party. | |||
| :I have received my admin buttons back in 2004, and I freely admit I haven't used them in a good while, but that's the way I remember things should be done, if challenged, take a step back and let others make a call. | |||
| :If you find a third admin (ideally one without known prejudice or involvement) and they decide to overturn my action, I absolutely promise you will hear no further complaints from me. --] <small>]</small> 12:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::As a third admin who had never heard of this editor before reading AN this morning? I think your unblock is so utterly unacceptable that I briefly entertained thoughts that your account was compromised due to the mentions of twitter canvassing on AN. This might have been acceptable back in 2004, but undiscussed unblocks (without even a formal unblock request!) are not the way things are done anymore, unless urgent or so clearly wrong that a misclick is the most likely explanation (think along the lines of blocking the AIV reporter for vandalism, not the vandal; we're talking that obvious), there needs to be discussion first before unilaterally undoing an admin action. The fact the block had stood for three days and no one else had undone it should have been enough to tell you it wasn't in that category. | |||
| ::As to how to resolve it? Reading that discussion I think a R&I topic ban is almost inevitable for Andew, done under ]. It wouldn't have surprised me had that discussion gone that way eventually without this hasty unblock. ] (]) 13:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :I urge you to respond to the ANI thread at the earliest possible opportunity. The longer you leave this, the higher the risk that you will lose your admin tools via a suspended arbitration case. See ] and ] for recent examples. ] ] ] 15:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Consensus might emerge that the block should be re-instated without Dbachmann having a chance to respond. But those suspended cases you link developed over days and weeks not hours. Dbachmann having said nothing about an ANI thread that is less than 2 hours old is not (on its own) a crisis that jeopardizes their status as an admin. I agree that Dbachmann should respond to the concerns raised at that thread under policy, but let's not over state the urgency at play here. ] (]) 16:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::I agree this is not ''that'' urgent at ''the moment''. My point was rather that the ANI thread can't be ignored completely, which is sometimes an option elsewhere. ] ] ] 16:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom case request notification == | |||
| I'm sure there's a template or something for this but I'm not aware of what I should use and what's important is notifiying you of this discussion. I initiated a case request at ArbCom: ]. ] ] 11:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:56, 22 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Dbachmann has not edited Misplaced Pages since 1 April 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
|
Archives: |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. | |
Fake Royalties Of India in Misplaced Pages
You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/Chamber_of_Princes). I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. Vinay Jha
Nomination for deletion of Template:PIE
Template:PIE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Languages attested from the 12th century BC
A tag has been placed on Category:Languages attested from the 12th century BC indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 20:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename
The Title and the descriptions are inaccurate , this needs fixing in Wiki and the glottocode as well. Daiopch54 (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: