| Revision as of 13:18, 13 March 2007 editZsinj (talk | contribs)Administrators16,127 edits unblocking on good faith, email contents also posted← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:33, 28 August 2007 edit undoPenwhale (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users7,574 edits Case closure notification | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1= I am blocked for no good reason. Please unblock me|decline=You are blocked because it is believed this account belongs to someone who is currently blocked from editing. -- ] 18:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| Dear Administrator, | Dear Administrator, | ||
| Line 9: | Line 7: | ||
| Batabat | Batabat | ||
| ==Arbcom== | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| You have been listed as a party of this arbcom: .] 03:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | {{tick|40}} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>While I will agree that Yamla did not assume good faith and did not give you any background information concerning your situation, I would like to point out that some of your edits back in February (http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Batabat) appear to have been in the defense of a blocked user. Sometimes blocked users are so frustrated that they create new user accounts to continue getting mad at people. This causes more of a disruption. It appears Yamla thought you were one of these new user accounts to continue spreading the disruption of that user. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - ] | <sup>] / ]</sup> 16:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Assuming good faith, I will unblock you. However, treat this as a warning that Misplaced Pages is not the place to spread your own opinion about topics. It is a place to collect cited, notable information for the world. A few key policies outline this: | |||
| == ] Closed == | |||
| *Notability guideline: http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:NOTE | |||
| The above named arbitration case in which you were named as a party has closed. The remedy is as follows: | |||
| *Citing sources guideline: http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:CITE | |||
| The remedies of revert limitations (formerly revert parole), including the limitation of 1 revert per week, civility supervision (formerly civility parole) and supervised editing (formerly probation) that were put in place at ] shall apply to any editor who edits articles which relate to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility. Before any penalty is applied, a warning placed on the editor's user talk page by an administrator shall serve as notice to the user that these remedies apply to them. | |||
| *Civility policy: http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:CIVIL | |||
| You may view the full case decisions ]. | |||
| I hope you will be a helpful contributor to our project and I welcome you back. Be careful not to cause the same disruption as you did last time, because no administrator will be able to unblock you next time. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' <font style="color:#22AA00;">''']'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>]</sup></font> 13:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| - ] | <sup>] / ]</sup> 00:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:33, 28 August 2007
Dear Administrator,
My my user name is Batabat. I live and work in Budapest, Hungary. Last month I was blocked by Yamla on a baseless ground that I am someone's sockpuppet. It took me a while to find out what this term in the language of the administrators meant. When I found this out, I wrote to Yamla to ask him/her to unblock me, because the suspicion was absolutely groundless. I even suggested him/her to call me or talk on a webcam to be assured that I am who I am. Unfortunately, Yamla never responded to my appeals.
I find this frustrating and, forgive my straightforward judgment, very unprofessional on the part of the administrator. Blocking a user on a mere "belief" that he/she might be a sockpuppet severely undermines the reputation of Wiki and its administrators. I appeal to other administrators to intervene into the matter and unblock me. I am not a sockpuppet!
Batabat
Arbcom
You have been listed as a party of this arbcom: .Hajji Piruz 03:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | 16:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 Closed
The above named arbitration case in which you were named as a party has closed. The remedy is as follows: The remedies of revert limitations (formerly revert parole), including the limitation of 1 revert per week, civility supervision (formerly civility parole) and supervised editing (formerly probation) that were put in place at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan shall apply to any editor who edits articles which relate to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility. Before any penalty is applied, a warning placed on the editor's user talk page by an administrator shall serve as notice to the user that these remedies apply to them.
You may view the full case decisions here.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | 00:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)