Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:36, 10 April 2023 editEfbrazil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,058 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:40, 9 October 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,374,856 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg/Archive 1. (BOT) 
(42 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}} {{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|search=yes|disclaimer=yes|bottom=yes}} {{Talk header|search=yes|disclaimer=yes|bottom=yes}}
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Jurists|class=GA}}
{{American English}} {{American English}}
{{Article history {{Article history
Line 26: Line 25:
|itn1date=19 September 2020 |itn1date=19 September 2020
|otd1date=2017-03-15|otd1oldid=770364934 |otd1date=2017-03-15|otd1oldid=770364934
|otd2date=2024-03-15|otd2oldid=1213780627
}} }}


{{WikiProject banner shell|1= {{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Ginsburg, Ruth Bader|1=
{{WikiProject Biography {{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=high|s&a-work-group=yes|s&a-priority=}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Law|importance=high}}
|living=no
⚫ {{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Low|Columbia=yes|Columbia-importance=Low}}
|class=GA
⚫ {{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}}
|listas=Ginsburg, Ruth Bader
⚫ {{WikiProject United States courts and judges|importance=High}}
|politician-work-group=yes
⚫ {{WikiProject Jewish Women|importance=low}}
|politician-priority=high
⚫ {{WikiProject Women writers|importance=high}}
|s&a-work-group=yes
|s&a-priority=
}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Law|class=GA|importance=high}}
⚫ {{WikiProject New York (state)|class=GA|importance=Low|Columbia=yes|Columbia-importance=Low}}
⚫ {{WikiProject New York City|class=GA|importance=Low}}
⚫ {{WikiProject United States courts and judges|class=GA|importance=High}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Jewish Women|class=GA|importance=low}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Women writers|class=GA|importance=high}}
}} }}
{{Annual readership|scale=log}} {{Annual readership|scale=log}}
Line 56: Line 48:
}} }}
{{TOC right}} {{TOC right}}
== Featured picture scheduled for POTD ==

Hello! This is to let editors know that ], a ] used in this article, has been selected as the English Misplaced Pages's ] (POTD) for March 15, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at ]. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the ]. The image is scheduled to run on the 90th anniversary of her birth. If you have any concerns, please place a message at ]. Thank you! --] (]) 20:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC) <!-- Template:UpcomingPOTD -->
<div style="margin-top:4px; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background:#faf5ff; overflow:auto;"><div style="margin:0.6em 0.4em 0.1em;">{{POTD/Day|2023-03-15|excludeheader=yes}}</div></div>

== Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023 ==

{{Edit semi-protected|Ruth Bader Ginsburg|answered=yes}}
A few lines down in the "In Popular Culture" section: "contented" should be changed to "contents" – the noun has been incorrectly transformed into the alternate-meaning verb formulation of the root word. ] (]) 02:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 02:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2023 ==

{{Edit semi-protected|Ruth Bader Ginsburg|answered=yes}}
I think there are enough critiques of Ginsburg's City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York decision by Indigenous people and scholars to merit mentioning that it provoked those responses. Many reports of the Vatican's recent decision to repudiate the discovery doctrine cite that decision as the most recent use of the concept, so it's clearly part of her legacy. ] (]) 19:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> &ndash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;(]) 19:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Ruth Bader Ginsburg|answered=yes}}
In the first paragraph, it says: "She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Court as the Court shifted to the right over time." This is unsourced and highly controversial. ] (]) 20:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 20:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
::I agree with the request, and it's easiest to simply delete the sentence. It adds little other than opinion, and is unsourced. I moved the wiki link to the next location mentioning her liberal views. ] (]) 17:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
::I additionally moved forward content that was sourced and covered her liberal leanings to replace what was deleted. I think it overall reads better now. ] (]) 17:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:40, 9 October 2024

Skip to table of contents
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruth Bader Ginsburg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Good articleRuth Bader Ginsburg has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 18, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
May 23, 2017Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
June 17, 2017Good article nomineeListed
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 19, 2020.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 15, 2017, and March 15, 2024.
Current status: Good article
This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
WikiProject iconLaw High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNew York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconNew York City Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States courts and judges High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJewish Women Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 11,884,007 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:


Categories: