| Revision as of 04:40, 25 April 2023 editItsfini (talk | contribs)271 edits →Claims: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 06:42, 20 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,248,675 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 6 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: Conspiracy theorists.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
| (25 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) |
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
| topic = socsci |
|
| topic = socsci |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Icke, David|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=Yes|class=GA|sports-priority=Low|sports-work-group=yes|listas=Icke, David}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|sports-priority=Low|sports-work-group=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|class=GA|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Football|class=GA|importance=Low|England=Yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Football|importance=Low|England=Yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Paranormal|class=GA}} |
|
{{WikiProject Paranormal}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|class=GA|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|class=GA|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=High}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement|relatedcontent=yes}} |
|
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement|relatedcontent=yes}} |
| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article tools|1=David Icke}} |
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Featured article tools|1=David Icke}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Writers|class=GA}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Proposal for a personal life section == |
|
|
|
|
|
It is common in BLPs for a personal life section to be placed near the end of the article with marriages etc. I won't monitor this page but am putting forward the suggestion. ] (]) 13:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== New article: Brian Rose == |
|
|
An article for an associate of Icke's, ], has been created. I thought editors here might be interested and help to improve it. ] (]) 10:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Reptilians quotes == |
|
== Reptilians quotes == |
| Line 48: |
Line 39: |
|
:::I've never been able to find a single reliable source for the claim that Icke believes in this farcical "Reptilian" theory. I'm 99% sure it's simply a smear tactic used against him to put people off listening to the other (very legitimate) subjects he speaks about. A bunch of links to articles in far left rags claiming that he said this or that (with zero sources) isn't worthy of mentioning in an encyclopedia, nor does it make the claims true. All of these smears and falsified "beliefs" that have been pinned on him should be entirely removed from the article.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span> |
|
:::I've never been able to find a single reliable source for the claim that Icke believes in this farcical "Reptilian" theory. I'm 99% sure it's simply a smear tactic used against him to put people off listening to the other (very legitimate) subjects he speaks about. A bunch of links to articles in far left rags claiming that he said this or that (with zero sources) isn't worthy of mentioning in an encyclopedia, nor does it make the claims true. All of these smears and falsified "beliefs" that have been pinned on him should be entirely removed from the article.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span> |
|
::::There seem to be thousands, including his own publications and many interviews where he promotes these claims. This includes many conservative outlets. I'm sorry, but since your claim appears to make zero sense on its face, perhaps you can clarify your position first? Are you saying he's being sarcastic the whole way through? ] ] 01:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
::::There seem to be thousands, including his own publications and many interviews where he promotes these claims. This includes many conservative outlets. I'm sorry, but since your claim appears to make zero sense on its face, perhaps you can clarify your position first? Are you saying he's being sarcastic the whole way through? ] ] 01:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::::@82.2.204.195 For some reason I can’t reply to the IP address directly, but in this interview<nowiki/>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlAjeTunopo he says that at 4:00. Note that Icke essentially replies that “The phrase ‘The world is run by shapeshifting lizards’ is a one line oversimplification without my backstory or context, if you read deeper into it and into my works you will understand it better.” but upon further examination it remains equally as false and baseless with no real or valid evidence. This isn’t a smear, those claims are real. |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Also note that the interviewer and others say that some of Icke’s other claims in the video are based on events that have actually happened so at least those theories and claims have got that going for them, that being they are based in part on reality, but the claim “Buckingham palace and the world is run by shapeshifting lizards and reptiles” is one he appears to genuinely agree with and has touted for years ] (]) 02:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
{{reflist talk}} |
|
{{reflist talk}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Footnote 8 == |
|
== please update the book section == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the article linked at footnote 8 does not say that his publisher dropped him or why. ] (]) 00:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
It is missing 2 books <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Reptilian shapeshifters == |
| ⚫ |
:This may well be true, but could you name the books?--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 06:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reptilian shapeshifters is linked to the wiki article on reptiles and there is no reference there to reptilian shapeshifters. ] (]) 00:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
== Icke's ban from the Netherlands == |
|
|
|
:{{done}} I broke it into two wikilinks. One to ] and the other to ]. ] (]) 23:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== his new book not in the selected works == |
|
The letter from the Dutch government is on Icke's website , but it is in Dutch. It is confirmed to be correct by the Dutch government. '''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 13:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the dream was released this year |
|
== Claims == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
can someone update the "selected works" ] (]) 22:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
Adding this here to avoid an edit-war. I recently went in and changed multiple references to 'claims' to more neutral language in accordance with WP:CLAIM and, in doing so, helped remedy some WP:NPOV issues. This has since been reverted by @] on the basis of "] ''does not say that we should never use the word, but "To say that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question" - which is exactly what we should do for statements which do not deserve any credibility''". |
|
|
|
:{{cn}} ] (]) 23:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{done}} ] (]) 09:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
For the avoidance of doubt, I agree that the statements lack credibility (Ike is labelled, correctly, as a conspiracy theorist after all), but I do think that belief, in and of itself, is not a neutral point of view. NPOV states "A neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity. Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. Do not editorialize. When editorial bias towards one particular point of view can be detected the article needs to be fixed. The only bias that should be evident is the bias attributed to the source." It would appear, rather, that we fix this not with the use of 'claims' throughout, but through making sure that we don't create false balance. As the NPOV article continues "There are many such beliefs in the world, some popular and some little-known: claims that the Earth is flat, that the Knights Templar possessed the Holy Grail, that the Apollo Moon landings were a hoax, and similar ones. Conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, speculative history, or plausible but currently unaccepted theories should not be legitimized through comparison to accepted academic scholarship. We do not take a stand on these issues as encyclopedia writers, for or against; we merely omit this information where including it would unduly legitimize it, and otherwise include and describe these ideas in their proper context concerning established scholarship and the beliefs of the wider world.". Ergo we need to make sure each 'claim' is described in its proper context. We can achieve this by either linking to or borrowing from relevant pages - for example the ], which manages to cover the subject without frequent use of 'claims' and other npov language. In doing so the following: |
|
|
According to Ike, there is an inter-dimensional race of reptilian beings, the ] or ], which have hijacked the Earth. |
|
|
...would become: |
|
|
Ike is a proponent of the ], believing that there is an inter-dimensional race of reptilian beings, which have hijacked the Earth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Short description== |
|
Use of the link to a conspiracy theory page, here, would provide context without comparison to accepted academic scholarship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Short description generally follows the basic information contained in the lead of the article. He is not much known as a footballer. Icke seems to be best known as a conspiracy theorist. This article starts {{TQ|David Vaughan Icke (...) is an English conspiracy theorist and ...}} so a Short description of {{TQ|English conspiracy theorist (born 1952)}} is reasonable. — ] <sup>]</sup> 11:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
I could be entirely wrong here though and would welcome discussion. ] (]) 04:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Agree. ] (]) 11:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::Also agree, he never hit the big time as a footballer, was somewhat more successful as a BBC sports presenter, and then really hit the big time with his alternative (cough cough) theories.--'''''] <sup>]</sup>''''' 11:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::yup ] (]) 15:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
Note as this was started today, at least give it until tomorrow to decide if there is a consensus. ] (]) 14:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
* No disagreement. Restored to {{TQ|English conspiracy theorist (born 1952)}} — ] <sup>]</sup> 20:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
* Agree per points mentioned above. He is primarily known as a conspiracy theorist. ] (]) 00:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
The Short description generally follows the basic information contained in the lead of the article. He is not much known as a footballer. Icke seems to be best known as a conspiracy theorist. This article starts David Vaughan Icke (...) is an English conspiracy theorist and ...
so a Short description of English conspiracy theorist (born 1952)
is reasonable. — GhostInTheMachine 11:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
Done I broke it into two wikilinks. One to Reptile and the other to Shapeshifting. Cullen328 (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)