| Revision as of 12:03, 15 March 2007 editRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits remove issues older than a month← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,323,036 editsm Robot: Fixing double redirect to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Society, sports, and culture | ||
| (133 intermediate revisions by 68 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{shortcut|]}} | |||
| {{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}} | |||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
| *] -- Edit-war problem: appropriate? See also ]. 22:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * Dispute whether the should be removed. 16:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Is appropriate on its own? ].18:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] -- Is a newly-added section "Principles of constitutional design" POV? 17:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] -- Is ] a reliable source or an extremist source? Is this article NPOV? 15:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] Should the ] be merged into ] or should it exist in summary style. 20:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] Should sections on recent scandals and ethnic/sex/diversity issues remain in the main article? Or should they be placed into the subsidiary article on the ] with a summary in the main history section. | |||
| *] - need input on if the article has improved or not. In particular whether it is still unbalanced with respect to ], written in a brochure style or deals with controversies in an inappropriate manner. Thanks in advance. 17:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]. Dispute over whether it is appropriate to state that all students "have at least average ability". 01:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]. Edit warring by editors who evidently believe that there really is no such thing as Islamphobia, and the Muslims have only themselves to blame. 00:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]. One editor isnists on adding long sections of exhaustive detail concerning the performance of the school's sports teams. 22:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] - are recent changes to the article helpful and do they adhere to NPOV? Which of two versions of the article is preferable? 15:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] - This organisation espouses legalisation of sexual relationship between men and boys. A fairly heated argument has developped over whether this article should be added to ]. Further imput welcomed. 01:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Should each entry in this list be individually sourced? -10:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]Improper use of ref tag as platform for making unsupported point. 16:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign--> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:00, 21 October 2009
Redirect to: