Misplaced Pages

Noncommutative geometry: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:21, 6 May 2023 editSilvermatsu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,169 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:22, 16 December 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,406,694 edits Removed URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Linked from User:Mathbot/Most_linked_math_articles | #UCB_webform_linked 1764/1913 
(32 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Branch of mathematics}} {{Short description|Branch of mathematics}}
'''Noncommutative geometry''' ('''NCG''') is a branch of ] concerned with a geometric approach to ]s, and with the construction of ''spaces'' that are locally presented by noncommutative algebras of functions (possibly in some generalized sense). A noncommutative algebra is an ] in which the multiplication is not ], that is, for which <math>xy</math> does not always equal <math>yx</math>; or more generally an ] in which one of the principal ]s is not commutative; one also allows additional structures, e.g. ] or ], to be possibly carried by the noncommutative algebra of functions. '''Noncommutative geometry''' ('''NCG''') is a branch of ] concerned with a geometric approach to ]s, and with the construction of ''spaces'' that are locally presented by noncommutative algebras of functions, possibly in some generalized sense. A noncommutative algebra is an ] in which the multiplication is not ], that is, for which <math>xy</math> does not always equal <math>yx</math>; or more generally an ] in which one of the principal ]s is not commutative; one also allows additional structures, e.g. ] or ], to be possibly carried by the noncommutative algebra of functions.


An approach giving deep insight about noncommutative spaces is through ] (i.e. algebras of ] on a ]).{{sfn|Khalkhali|Marcolli|2008|p=171}} Perhaps one of the typical examples of a noncommutative space is the "]", which played a key role in the early development of this field in 1980s and lead to noncommutative versions of ], ], ], etc.{{sfn|Khalkhali|Marcolli|2008|p=21}} An approach giving deep insight about noncommutative spaces is through ], that is, algebras of ] on a ].{{sfn|Khalkhali|Marcolli|2008|p=171}} Perhaps one of the typical examples of a noncommutative space is the "]", which played a key role in the early development of this field in 1980s and lead to noncommutative versions of ], ], ], etc.{{sfn|Khalkhali|Marcolli|2008|p=21}}


==Motivation== ==Motivation==


The main motivation is to extend the commutative duality between spaces and functions to the noncommutative setting. In mathematics, ''spaces'', which are geometric in nature, can be related to numerical ] on them. In general, such functions will form a ]. For instance, one may take the ring ''C''(''X'') of ] ]-valued functions on a ] ''X''. In many cases (''e.g.'', if ''X'' is a ] ]), we can recover ''X'' from ''C''(''X''), and therefore it makes some sense to say that ''X'' has ''commutative topology''. The main motivation is to extend the commutative duality between spaces and functions to the noncommutative setting. In mathematics, '']'', which are geometric in nature, can be related to numerical ] on them. In general, such functions will form a ]. For instance, one may take the ring ''C''(''X'') of ] ]-valued functions on a ] ''X''. In many cases (''e.g.'', if ''X'' is a ] ]), we can recover ''X'' from ''C''(''X''), and therefore it makes some sense to say that ''X'' has ''commutative topology''.


More specifically, in topology, compact ] topological spaces can be reconstructed from the ] of functions on the space (]). In commutative ], ]s are locally prime spectra of commutative unital rings (]), and every quasi-separated scheme <math>X</math> can be reconstructed up to isomorphism of schemes from the category of quasicoherent sheaves of <math>O_X</math>-modules (]–A. Rosenberg). For ], the cohomological properties of a site are invariants of the corresponding category of sheaves of sets viewed abstractly as a ] (A. Grothendieck). In all these cases, a space is reconstructed from the algebra of functions or its categorified version—some ] on that space. More specifically, in topology, compact ] topological spaces can be reconstructed from the ] of functions on the space (]). In commutative ], ]s are locally prime spectra of commutative unital rings (]), and every quasi-separated scheme <math>X</math> can be reconstructed up to isomorphism of schemes from the category of quasicoherent sheaves of <math>O_X</math>-modules (]–A. Rosenberg). For ], the cohomological properties of a site are invariants of the corresponding category of sheaves of sets viewed abstractly as a ] (A. Grothendieck). In all these cases, a space is reconstructed from the algebra of functions or its categorified version—some ] on that space.


Functions on a topological space can be multiplied and added pointwise hence they form a commutative algebra; in fact these operations are local in the topology of the base space, hence the functions form a sheaf of commutative rings over the base space. Functions on a topological space can be multiplied and added pointwise hence they form a commutative algebra; in fact these operations are local in the topology of the base space, hence the functions form a sheaf of commutative rings over the base space.
Line 18: Line 18:
===Applications in mathematical physics=== ===Applications in mathematical physics===


Some applications in ] are described in the entries ] and ]. The sudden rise in interest in noncommutative geometry in physics follows after the speculations of its role in ] made in 1997.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Connes | first1=Alain | last2=Douglas | first2=Michael R | last3=Schwarz | first3=Albert | title=Noncommutative geometry and Matrix theory | journal=Journal of High Energy Physics | volume=1998 | issue=2 | date=1998-02-05 | issn=1029-8479 | doi=10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/003 | pages=003|arxiv=hep-th/9711162| bibcode=1998JHEP...02..003C | s2cid=7562354 }}</ref> Some applications in ] are described in the entries ] and ]. The sudden rise in interest in noncommutative geometry in physics follows after the speculations of its role in ] made in 1997.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Connes | first1=Alain | last2=Douglas | first2=Michael R | last3=Schwarz | first3=Albert | title=Noncommutative geometry and Matrix theory | journal=] | volume=1998 | issue=2 | date=1998-02-05 | issn=1029-8479 | doi=10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/003 | pages=003|arxiv=hep-th/9711162| bibcode=1998JHEP...02..003C | s2cid=7562354 }}</ref>


===Motivation from ergodic theory=== ===Motivation from ergodic theory===
Line 26: Line 26:
The (formal) duals of ] ]s are often now called non-commutative spaces. This is by analogy with the ], which shows that ] C*-algebras are ] to ] ]s. In general, one can associate to any C*-algebra ''S'' a topological space ''Ŝ''; see ]. The (formal) duals of ] ]s are often now called non-commutative spaces. This is by analogy with the ], which shows that ] C*-algebras are ] to ] ]s. In general, one can associate to any C*-algebra ''S'' a topological space ''Ŝ''; see ].


For the ] between σ-finite ]s and commutative ]s, ] ]s are called ''non-commutative ]s''. For the ] between localizable ]s and commutative ]s, ] ]s are called ''non-commutative ]s''.


==Noncommutative differentiable manifolds== ==Noncommutative differentiable manifolds==


A smooth ] ''M'' is a topological space with a lot of extra structure. From its algebra of continuous functions ''C''(''M'') we only recover ''M'' topologically. The algebraic invariant that recovers the Riemannian structure is a ]. It is constructed from a smooth vector bundle ''E'' over ''M'', e.g. the exterior algebra bundle. The Hilbert space ''L''<sup>2</sup>(''M'',&nbsp;''E'') of square integrable sections of ''E'' carries a representation of ''C''(''M)'' by multiplication operators, and we consider an unbounded operator ''D'' in ''L''<sup>2</sup>(''M'',&nbsp;''E'') with compact resolvent (e.g. the ]), such that the commutators are bounded whenever ''f'' is smooth. A deep theorem<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.4171/JNCG/108|title=On the spectral characterization of manifolds |year=2013 |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |journal=Journal of Noncommutative Geometry |volume=7 |pages=1–82 |s2cid=17287100|arxiv=0810.2088}}</ref> states that ''M'' as a Riemannian manifold can be recovered from this data. A smooth ] ''M'' is a ] with a lot of extra structure. From its algebra of continuous functions ''C''(''M''), we only recover ''M'' topologically. The algebraic invariant that recovers the Riemannian structure is a ]. It is constructed from a smooth vector bundle ''E'' over ''M'', e.g. the exterior algebra bundle. The Hilbert space ''L''<sup>2</sup>(''M'',&nbsp;''E'') of square integrable sections of ''E'' carries a representation of ''C''(''M)'' by multiplication operators, and we consider an unbounded operator ''D'' in ''L''<sup>2</sup>(''M'',&nbsp;''E'') with compact resolvent (e.g. the ]), such that the commutators are bounded whenever ''f'' is smooth. A deep theorem<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.4171/JNCG/108|title=On the spectral characterization of manifolds |year=2013 |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |journal=Journal of Noncommutative Geometry |volume=7 |pages=1–82 |s2cid=17287100|arxiv=0810.2088}}</ref> states that ''M'' as a Riemannian manifold can be recovered from this data.


This suggests that one might define a noncommutative Riemannian manifold as a ] (''A'',&nbsp;''H'',&nbsp;''D''), consisting of a representation of a C*-algebra ''A'' on a Hilbert space ''H'', together with an unbounded operator ''D'' on ''H'', with compact resolvent, such that is bounded for all ''a'' in some dense subalgebra of ''A''. Research in spectral triples is very active, and many examples of noncommutative manifolds have been constructed. This suggests that one might define a noncommutative Riemannian manifold as a ] (''A'',&nbsp;''H'',&nbsp;''D''), consisting of a representation of a C*-algebra ''A'' on a Hilbert space ''H'', together with an unbounded operator ''D'' on ''H'', with compact resolvent, such that is bounded for all ''a'' in some dense subalgebra of ''A''. Research in spectral triples is very active, and many examples of noncommutative manifolds have been constructed.
Line 39: Line 39:
There are also generalizations of the Cone and of the Proj of a commutative graded ring, mimicking a theorem of ] on Proj. Namely the category of quasicoherent sheaves of O-modules on a Proj of a commutative graded algebra is equivalent to the category of graded modules over the ring localized on Serre's subcategory of graded modules of finite length; there is also analogous theorem for coherent sheaves when the algebra is Noetherian. This theorem is extended as a definition of '''noncommutative projective geometry''' by ] and J. J. Zhang,<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Artin | first1=M. | last2=Zhang | first2=J.J. | title=Noncommutative Projective Schemes | journal=] | volume=109 | issue=2 | year=1994 | issn=0001-8708 | doi=10.1006/aima.1994.1087 | pages=228–287| doi-access=free }}</ref> who add also some general ring-theoretic conditions (e.g. Artin–Schelter regularity). There are also generalizations of the Cone and of the Proj of a commutative graded ring, mimicking a theorem of ] on Proj. Namely the category of quasicoherent sheaves of O-modules on a Proj of a commutative graded algebra is equivalent to the category of graded modules over the ring localized on Serre's subcategory of graded modules of finite length; there is also analogous theorem for coherent sheaves when the algebra is Noetherian. This theorem is extended as a definition of '''noncommutative projective geometry''' by ] and J. J. Zhang,<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Artin | first1=M. | last2=Zhang | first2=J.J. | title=Noncommutative Projective Schemes | journal=] | volume=109 | issue=2 | year=1994 | issn=0001-8708 | doi=10.1006/aima.1994.1087 | pages=228–287| doi-access=free }}</ref> who add also some general ring-theoretic conditions (e.g. Artin–Schelter regularity).


Many properties of projective schemes extend to this context. For example, there exists an analog of the celebrated ] for noncommutative projective schemes of Artin and Zhang.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Yekutieli | first1=Amnon | last2=Zhang | first2=James J. |title=Serre duality for noncommutative projective schemes| journal=Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society | publisher=American Mathematical Society (AMS) | volume=125 | issue=3 | date=1997-03-01 | issn=0002-9939 | doi=10.1090/s0002-9939-97-03782-9 | pages=697–708|doi-access=free}}</ref> Many properties of projective schemes extend to this context. For example, there exists an analog of the celebrated ] for noncommutative projective schemes of Artin and Zhang.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Yekutieli | first1=Amnon | last2=Zhang | first2=James J. |title=Serre duality for noncommutative projective schemes| journal=] | publisher=American Mathematical Society (AMS) | volume=125 | issue=3 | date=1997-03-01 | issn=0002-9939 | doi=10.1090/s0002-9939-97-03782-9 | pages=697–708|doi-access=free}}</ref>


A. L. Rosenberg has created a rather general relative concept of '''noncommutative quasicompact scheme''' (over a base category), abstracting Grothendieck's study of morphisms of schemes and covers in terms of categories of quasicoherent sheaves and flat localization functors.<ref>A. L. Rosenberg, Noncommutative schemes, Compositio Mathematica 112 (1998) 93--125, ; Underlying spaces of noncommutative schemes, preprint MPIM2003-111, , ; ] lecture ''Noncommutative schemes and spaces'' (Feb 2000): </ref> There is also another interesting approach via localization theory, due to ], Luc Willaert and Alain Verschoren, where the main concept is that of a '''schematic algebra'''.<ref>Freddy van Oystaeyen, Algebraic geometry for associative algebras, {{isbn|0-8247-0424-X}} - New York: Dekker, 2000.- 287 p. - (Monographs and textbooks in pure and applied mathematics, 232)</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Van Oystaeyen | first1=Fred | last2=Willaert | first2=Luc | title=Grothendieck topology, coherent sheaves and Serre's theorem for schematic algebras | journal=Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=104 | issue=1 | year=1995 | issn=0022-4049 | doi=10.1016/0022-4049(94)00118-3 | pages=109–122| hdl=10067/124190151162165141 | url=https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/3d00aa/5163.pdf | hdl-access=free }}</ref> A. L. Rosenberg has created a rather general relative concept of '''noncommutative quasicompact scheme''' (over a base category), abstracting Grothendieck's study of morphisms of schemes and covers in terms of categories of quasicoherent sheaves and flat localization functors.<ref>A. L. Rosenberg, Noncommutative schemes, Compositio Mathematica 112 (1998) 93--125, ; Underlying spaces of noncommutative schemes, preprint MPIM2003-111, , ; ] lecture ''Noncommutative schemes and spaces'' (Feb 2000): </ref> There is also another interesting approach via localization theory, due to ], Luc Willaert and Alain Verschoren, where the main concept is that of a '''schematic algebra'''.<ref>Freddy van Oystaeyen, Algebraic geometry for associative algebras, {{isbn|0-8247-0424-X}} - New York: Dekker, 2000.- 287 p. - (Monographs and textbooks in pure and applied mathematics, 232)</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Van Oystaeyen | first1=Fred | last2=Willaert | first2=Luc | title=Grothendieck topology, coherent sheaves and Serre's theorem for schematic algebras | journal=] | publisher=Elsevier BV | volume=104 | issue=1 | year=1995 | issn=0022-4049 | doi=10.1016/0022-4049(94)00118-3 | pages=109–122| hdl=10067/124190151162165141 | url=https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/3d00aa/5163.pdf | hdl-access=free }}</ref>


==Invariants for noncommutative spaces== ==Invariants for noncommutative spaces==


Some of the motivating questions of the theory are concerned with extending known ]s to formal duals of noncommutative (operator) algebras and other replacements and candidates for noncommutative spaces. One of the main starting points of ]' direction in noncommutative geometry is his discovery of a new homology theory associated to noncommutative associative algebras and noncommutative operator algebras, namely the ] and its relations to the algebraic K-theory (primarily via Connes–Chern character map). Some of the motivating questions of the theory are concerned with extending known ]s to formal duals of noncommutative (operator) algebras and other replacements and candidates for noncommutative spaces. One of the main starting points of ]' direction in noncommutative geometry is his discovery of a new homology theory associated to noncommutative associative algebras and noncommutative operator algebras, namely the ] and its relations to the ] (primarily via Connes–Chern character map).


The theory of ] of smooth manifolds has been extended to spectral triples, employing the tools of operator ] and ]. Several generalizations of now-classical ]s allow for effective extraction of numerical invariants from spectral triples. The fundamental characteristic class in cyclic cohomology, the ], generalizes the classical ]. The theory of ] of smooth manifolds has been extended to spectral triples, employing the tools of operator ] and ]. Several generalizations of now-classical ]s allow for effective extraction of numerical invariants from spectral triples. The fundamental characteristic class in cyclic cohomology, the ], generalizes the classical ].
Line 53: Line 53:
* The ] is a proposed extension of the ] of particle physics. * The ] is a proposed extension of the ] of particle physics.
* The ], deformation of the function algebra of the ordinary torus, can be given the structure of a spectral triple. This class of examples has been studied intensively and still functions as a test case for more complicated situations. * The ], deformation of the function algebra of the ordinary torus, can be given the structure of a spectral triple. This class of examples has been studied intensively and still functions as a test case for more complicated situations.
* Snyder space<ref>{{cite journal | last=Snyder | first=Hartland S. | title=Quantized Space-Time | journal=Physical Review | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=71 | issue=1 | date=1947-01-01 | issn=0031-899X | doi=10.1103/physrev.71.38 | pages=38–41| bibcode=1947PhRv...71...38S }}</ref> * Snyder space<ref>{{cite journal | last=Snyder | first=Hartland S. | title=Quantized Space-Time | journal=] | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=71 | issue=1 | date=1947-01-01 | issn=0031-899X | doi=10.1103/physrev.71.38 | pages=38–41| bibcode=1947PhRv...71...38S }}</ref>
* Noncommutative algebras arising from ]s. * Noncommutative algebras arising from ]s.
* Examples related to ] arising from ], such as the ] on continued fractions, give rise to noncommutative algebras that appear to have interesting noncommutative geometries. * Examples related to ] arising from ], such as the ] on continued fractions, give rise to noncommutative algebras that appear to have interesting noncommutative geometries.
== Connection == == Connection ==
{{Expand section|reason=nLab (Connection in noncommutative geometry) states there are several such concepts.|date=May 2023}}
{{Under construction}}
===In the sense of Connes <span class="anchor" id="Connes connection"></span>===
{{Expand section|reason=To split this section from this article and create a Connes connection, we need to add some context.|date=May 2023}}
A '''Connes connection''' is a noncommutative generalization of a ] in ]. It was introduced by ], and was later generalized by ] and ].


==== Definition ====
In mathematics, a '''Connes connection''' is a ] generalization of a ] in ].{{Further explanation needed|reason=nLab states there are several such concepts - how is *this* concept defined?|date=March 2023}} It was introduced by ], and was later generalized by ] and ].

== Definition ==
Given a right ''A''-module ''E'', a Connes connection on ''E'' is a linear map Given a right ''A''-module ''E'', a Connes connection on ''E'' is a linear map
:<math>\nabla : E \to E \otimes_A \Omega^1 A</math> :<math>\nabla : E \to E \otimes_A \Omega^1 A</math>
that satisfies the ] <math>\nabla_r(sa) = \nabla_r(s) a + s \otimes da</math>.<ref>{{harvnb|Vale|2009|loc=Definition 8.1.}}</ref> that satisfies the ] <math>\nabla_r(sa) = \nabla_r(s) a + s \otimes da</math>.<ref>{{harvnb|Vale|2009|loc=Definition 8.1.}}</ref>
<!-- need to discuss a more general version involving cyclic homology. --> <!-- need to discuss a more general version involving cyclic homology. -->

== See also ==
* ]
* ]

== Note ==
{{Reflist}}



==See also== ==See also==
*] *]
*] *]
*]
*] *]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
*]
*]


==Citations== ==Citations==
Line 96: Line 91:
*{{Citation | first1=Fred | last1=Van Oystaeyen | first2=Alain | last2=Verschoren | title=Non-commutative algebraic geometry | publisher=] | series=Lecture Notes in Mathematics | volume=887 | year=1981 | isbn=978-3-540-11153-5}} *{{Citation | first1=Fred | last1=Van Oystaeyen | first2=Alain | last2=Verschoren | title=Non-commutative algebraic geometry | publisher=] | series=Lecture Notes in Mathematics | volume=887 | year=1981 | isbn=978-3-540-11153-5}}
{{refend}} {{refend}}
===Connes connection=== ===References for Connes connection===
{{refbegin|2}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |url= https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5492289h/f43.item|title=C* algèbres et géométrie différentielle |year=1980 |journal=C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A|volume=290|issue=13|pages=599–604}} * {{cite journal |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |url= https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5492289h/f43.item|title=C* algèbres et géométrie différentielle |year=1980 |journal=C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A|volume=290|issue=13|pages=599–604|lang=fr}}
** {{cite arXiv |year=2001 |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |title=C* algebras and differential geometry |eprint=hep-th/0101093 }} ** {{cite arXiv |year=2001 |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |title=C* algebras and differential geometry |eprint=hep-th/0101093 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |title=Non-commutative differential geometry |journal=Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS |date=1985 |volume=62 |pages=41–144 |doi=10.1007/BF02698807 |s2cid=122740195 |url=http://www.numdam.org/item/?id=PMIHES_1985__62__41_0 |language=en |issn=1618-1913}} * {{cite journal |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |title=Non-commutative differential geometry |journal=] |date=1985 |volume=62 |pages=41–144 |doi=10.1007/BF02698807 |s2cid=122740195 |url=http://www.numdam.org/item/?id=PMIHES_1985__62__41_0 |language=en |issn=1618-1913}}
* {{cite book |isbn=978-0-08-057175-1|title=Noncommutative Geometry |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |year=1995|publisher=Academic Press}} * {{cite book |isbn=978-0-08-057175-1|title=Noncommutative Geometry |last1=Connes |first1=Alain |year=1995|publisher=Academic Press}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Cuntz |first1=Joachim |last2=Quillen |first2=Daniel |title=Algebra Extensions and Nonsingularity |journal=Journal of the American Mathematical Society |date=1995 |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=251–289 |doi=10.2307/2152819 |jstor=2152819 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2152819 |issn=0894-0347}} * {{cite journal |last1=Cuntz |first1=Joachim |last2=Quillen |first2=Daniel |title=Algebra Extensions and Nonsingularity |journal=] |date=1995 |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=251–289 |doi=10.2307/2152819 |jstor=2152819 |issn=0894-0347|doi-access=free }}
*{{cite journal |doi=10.3842/SIGMA.2012.006|title=On Lie Algebroids and Poisson Algebras |year=2012 |last1=García-Beltrán |first1=Dennise |last2=a-Beltrán |first2=Dennise |last3=Vallejo |first3=José A. |last4=Vorobjev |first4=Yuriĭ |journal=Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications |volume=8 |page=006 |arxiv=1106.1512 |bibcode=2012SIGMA...8..006G |s2cid=5946411 }} *{{cite journal |doi=10.3842/SIGMA.2012.006|title=On Lie Algebroids and Poisson Algebras |year=2012 |last1=García-Beltrán |first1=Dennise |last2=a-Beltrán |first2=Dennise |last3=Vallejo |first3=José A. |last4=Vorobjev |first4=Yuriĭ |journal=Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications |volume=8 |page=006 |arxiv=1106.1512 |bibcode=2012SIGMA...8..006G |s2cid=5946411 }}
* * {{cite web |title=notes on quasi-free algebras |last=Vale |first=R. |date=2009 |url=https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~rvale/ada.pdf}} * * {{cite web |title=notes on quasi-free algebras |last=Vale |first=R. |date=2009 |url=https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~rvale/ada.pdf}}
*{{cite book |doi=10.1017/9781108855846.009|chapter=Connections |title=Topics in Cyclic Theory |year=2020 |pages=201–228 |isbn=9781108855846 }} *{{cite book |doi=10.1017/9781108855846.009|chapter=Connections |title=Topics in Cyclic Theory |year=2020 |pages=201–228 |isbn=9781108855846 }}
{{ref end}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==

Latest revision as of 11:22, 16 December 2024

Branch of mathematics

Noncommutative geometry (NCG) is a branch of mathematics concerned with a geometric approach to noncommutative algebras, and with the construction of spaces that are locally presented by noncommutative algebras of functions, possibly in some generalized sense. A noncommutative algebra is an associative algebra in which the multiplication is not commutative, that is, for which x y {\displaystyle xy} does not always equal y x {\displaystyle yx} ; or more generally an algebraic structure in which one of the principal binary operations is not commutative; one also allows additional structures, e.g. topology or norm, to be possibly carried by the noncommutative algebra of functions.

An approach giving deep insight about noncommutative spaces is through operator algebras, that is, algebras of bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space. Perhaps one of the typical examples of a noncommutative space is the "noncommutative torus", which played a key role in the early development of this field in 1980s and lead to noncommutative versions of vector bundles, connections, curvature, etc.

Motivation

The main motivation is to extend the commutative duality between spaces and functions to the noncommutative setting. In mathematics, spaces, which are geometric in nature, can be related to numerical functions on them. In general, such functions will form a commutative ring. For instance, one may take the ring C(X) of continuous complex-valued functions on a topological space X. In many cases (e.g., if X is a compact Hausdorff space), we can recover X from C(X), and therefore it makes some sense to say that X has commutative topology.

More specifically, in topology, compact Hausdorff topological spaces can be reconstructed from the Banach algebra of functions on the space (Gelfand–Naimark). In commutative algebraic geometry, algebraic schemes are locally prime spectra of commutative unital rings (A. Grothendieck), and every quasi-separated scheme X {\displaystyle X} can be reconstructed up to isomorphism of schemes from the category of quasicoherent sheaves of O X {\displaystyle O_{X}} -modules (P. Gabriel–A. Rosenberg). For Grothendieck topologies, the cohomological properties of a site are invariants of the corresponding category of sheaves of sets viewed abstractly as a topos (A. Grothendieck). In all these cases, a space is reconstructed from the algebra of functions or its categorified version—some category of sheaves on that space.

Functions on a topological space can be multiplied and added pointwise hence they form a commutative algebra; in fact these operations are local in the topology of the base space, hence the functions form a sheaf of commutative rings over the base space.

The dream of noncommutative geometry is to generalize this duality to the duality between noncommutative algebras, or sheaves of noncommutative algebras, or sheaf-like noncommutative algebraic or operator-algebraic structures, and geometric entities of certain kinds, and give an interaction between the algebraic and geometric description of those via this duality.

Regarding that the commutative rings correspond to usual affine schemes, and commutative C*-algebras to usual topological spaces, the extension to noncommutative rings and algebras requires non-trivial generalization of topological spaces as "non-commutative spaces". For this reason there is some talk about non-commutative topology, though the term also has other meanings.

Applications in mathematical physics

Some applications in particle physics are described in the entries noncommutative standard model and noncommutative quantum field theory. The sudden rise in interest in noncommutative geometry in physics follows after the speculations of its role in M-theory made in 1997.

Motivation from ergodic theory

Some of the theory developed by Alain Connes to handle noncommutative geometry at a technical level has roots in older attempts, in particular in ergodic theory. The proposal of George Mackey to create a virtual subgroup theory, with respect to which ergodic group actions would become homogeneous spaces of an extended kind, has by now been subsumed.

Noncommutative C*-algebras, von Neumann algebras

The (formal) duals of non-commutative C*-algebras are often now called non-commutative spaces. This is by analogy with the Gelfand representation, which shows that commutative C*-algebras are dual to locally compact Hausdorff spaces. In general, one can associate to any C*-algebra S a topological space Ŝ; see spectrum of a C*-algebra.

For the duality between localizable measure spaces and commutative von Neumann algebras, noncommutative von Neumann algebras are called non-commutative measure spaces.

Noncommutative differentiable manifolds

A smooth Riemannian manifold M is a topological space with a lot of extra structure. From its algebra of continuous functions C(M), we only recover M topologically. The algebraic invariant that recovers the Riemannian structure is a spectral triple. It is constructed from a smooth vector bundle E over M, e.g. the exterior algebra bundle. The Hilbert space L(ME) of square integrable sections of E carries a representation of C(M) by multiplication operators, and we consider an unbounded operator D in L(ME) with compact resolvent (e.g. the signature operator), such that the commutators are bounded whenever f is smooth. A deep theorem states that M as a Riemannian manifold can be recovered from this data.

This suggests that one might define a noncommutative Riemannian manifold as a spectral triple (AHD), consisting of a representation of a C*-algebra A on a Hilbert space H, together with an unbounded operator D on H, with compact resolvent, such that is bounded for all a in some dense subalgebra of A. Research in spectral triples is very active, and many examples of noncommutative manifolds have been constructed.

Noncommutative affine and projective schemes

In analogy to the duality between affine schemes and commutative rings, we define a category of noncommutative affine schemes as the dual of the category of associative unital rings. There are certain analogues of Zariski topology in that context so that one can glue such affine schemes to more general objects.

There are also generalizations of the Cone and of the Proj of a commutative graded ring, mimicking a theorem of Serre on Proj. Namely the category of quasicoherent sheaves of O-modules on a Proj of a commutative graded algebra is equivalent to the category of graded modules over the ring localized on Serre's subcategory of graded modules of finite length; there is also analogous theorem for coherent sheaves when the algebra is Noetherian. This theorem is extended as a definition of noncommutative projective geometry by Michael Artin and J. J. Zhang, who add also some general ring-theoretic conditions (e.g. Artin–Schelter regularity).

Many properties of projective schemes extend to this context. For example, there exists an analog of the celebrated Serre duality for noncommutative projective schemes of Artin and Zhang.

A. L. Rosenberg has created a rather general relative concept of noncommutative quasicompact scheme (over a base category), abstracting Grothendieck's study of morphisms of schemes and covers in terms of categories of quasicoherent sheaves and flat localization functors. There is also another interesting approach via localization theory, due to Fred Van Oystaeyen, Luc Willaert and Alain Verschoren, where the main concept is that of a schematic algebra.

Invariants for noncommutative spaces

Some of the motivating questions of the theory are concerned with extending known topological invariants to formal duals of noncommutative (operator) algebras and other replacements and candidates for noncommutative spaces. One of the main starting points of Alain Connes' direction in noncommutative geometry is his discovery of a new homology theory associated to noncommutative associative algebras and noncommutative operator algebras, namely the cyclic homology and its relations to the algebraic K-theory (primarily via Connes–Chern character map).

The theory of characteristic classes of smooth manifolds has been extended to spectral triples, employing the tools of operator K-theory and cyclic cohomology. Several generalizations of now-classical index theorems allow for effective extraction of numerical invariants from spectral triples. The fundamental characteristic class in cyclic cohomology, the JLO cocycle, generalizes the classical Chern character.

Examples of noncommutative spaces

Connection

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2023)

In the sense of Connes

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2023)

A Connes connection is a noncommutative generalization of a connection in differential geometry. It was introduced by Alain Connes, and was later generalized by Joachim Cuntz and Daniel Quillen.

Definition

Given a right A-module E, a Connes connection on E is a linear map

: E E A Ω 1 A {\displaystyle \nabla :E\to E\otimes _{A}\Omega ^{1}A}

that satisfies the Leibniz rule r ( s a ) = r ( s ) a + s d a {\displaystyle \nabla _{r}(sa)=\nabla _{r}(s)a+s\otimes da} .

See also

Citations

  1. Khalkhali & Marcolli 2008, p. 171.
  2. Khalkhali & Marcolli 2008, p. 21.
  3. Connes, Alain; Douglas, Michael R; Schwarz, Albert (1998-02-05). "Noncommutative geometry and Matrix theory". Journal of High Energy Physics. 1998 (2): 003. arXiv:hep-th/9711162. Bibcode:1998JHEP...02..003C. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/003. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 7562354.
  4. Connes, Alain (2013). "On the spectral characterization of manifolds". Journal of Noncommutative Geometry. 7: 1–82. arXiv:0810.2088. doi:10.4171/JNCG/108. S2CID 17287100.
  5. Artin, M.; Zhang, J.J. (1994). "Noncommutative Projective Schemes". Advances in Mathematics. 109 (2): 228–287. doi:10.1006/aima.1994.1087. ISSN 0001-8708.
  6. Yekutieli, Amnon; Zhang, James J. (1997-03-01). "Serre duality for noncommutative projective schemes". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 125 (3). American Mathematical Society (AMS): 697–708. doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-97-03782-9. ISSN 0002-9939.
  7. A. L. Rosenberg, Noncommutative schemes, Compositio Mathematica 112 (1998) 93--125, doi; Underlying spaces of noncommutative schemes, preprint MPIM2003-111, dvi, ps; MSRI lecture Noncommutative schemes and spaces (Feb 2000): video
  8. Freddy van Oystaeyen, Algebraic geometry for associative algebras, ISBN 0-8247-0424-X - New York: Dekker, 2000.- 287 p. - (Monographs and textbooks in pure and applied mathematics, 232)
  9. Van Oystaeyen, Fred; Willaert, Luc (1995). "Grothendieck topology, coherent sheaves and Serre's theorem for schematic algebras" (PDF). Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 104 (1). Elsevier BV: 109–122. doi:10.1016/0022-4049(94)00118-3. hdl:10067/124190151162165141. ISSN 0022-4049.
  10. Snyder, Hartland S. (1947-01-01). "Quantized Space-Time". Physical Review. 71 (1). American Physical Society (APS): 38–41. Bibcode:1947PhRv...71...38S. doi:10.1103/physrev.71.38. ISSN 0031-899X.
  11. Vale 2009, Definition 8.1.

References

References for Connes connection

Further reading

External links

Categories: