| Revision as of 17:07, 17 March 2007 edit24fan24 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,454 edits →{{user|AMD64}}: d← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:15, 10 December 2024 edit undoSYSS Mouse (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,157 edits archivingTag: Manual revert | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{RFCUsername}} ] ] | |||
| __NEWSECTIONLINK__ | |||
| {{Template:RFCUsername}} | |||
| == {{user|Wickedsuperbikes}} == | |||
| ==Reports== | |||
| Refused by ]. ] ] 17:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please remember that this is ''not a vote'', rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion. | |||
| *'''Allow''' in good faith, any evidence that's who this person is editing as? - ]</small> (]) 17:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> | |||
| *'''Disallow'''. "Usernames that promote a company: Usernames of or closely resembling the names of companies and groups are discouraged and may be blocked as a violation of Misplaced Pages policy against spamming and advertisement." ] 18:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Usernames should be *discussed* with the user prior to reporting here. --> | |||
| *'''Disallow''' Company name. --] <sup>]</sup><small>]<sub>] </sub></small> 19:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Undiscussed reports will be removed summarily. --> | |||
| :*'''Comment'''. This anti-company name thing is almost becoming too big, and I think we should have some more discussion about it. As quoted above by Coemgenus, WP:U says "... are ''discouraged'' and ''may'' be blocked..." . That is not the same as ''absolutely'' prohibited and ''will'' be blocked. We have to look at intent with the name. In this case, my first thought of the username is not that it is a business, just some person who likes superbikes. I believe we should assume good faith. Of course, if the user starts spamming or making edits that even subtly advertise the company, then obviously the name becomes a violation of WP:U. That is not to say that we should wait for intent in all cases; some names would always be bad e.g. ]. This pursuit of finding all usernames that are also companies also becomes a slippery slope. I'm pretty sure there are many businesses called "Joe's Garage." So is ] advertising, or is he/she a ] fan? Anyway. Comments and feedback are welcome. ('''note''': I will cross-post this to the ]). Regards, ]<sup>]</sup>]</sub> 19:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Please be sure to use the {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}} template: --> | |||
| *'''Allow''' per my comment above. ]<sup>]</sup>]</sub> 19:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- New reports go at the TOP, below this line. --> | |||
| *'''Allow''' per Flyguy649. Without any edits that suggest this person is impersonating a company or making spammy edits, I believe this should be allowed. ] 20:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' per Flyguy649. // ] 21:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' - The name shoud be allowed but to avoid any sort of problems in the future, it would be advisable to tell the user to change his name around a bit to maybe "Wickedsupabikes"..Just my 2 cents..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:small;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span> 21:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' unless ] issues become apparent. This username isn't necessarily linked to the business. ] 23:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' per Flyguy649 ] ('']'') 17:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.'' | |||
| == {{user|PYOINC}} == | |||
| ----<!-- Below this one --> | |||
| Refused by ]. ] ] 17:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' in good faith, any evidence that's who this person is editing as? - ]</small> (]) 17:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow'''. "Usernames of or closely resembling the names of companies and groups are discouraged and may be blocked as a violation of Misplaced Pages policy against spamming and advertisement." ] 18:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' Company name. --] <sup>]</sup><small>]<sub>] </sub></small> 19:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' in good faith, and per my comment in Wickedsuperbikes, above. Also, on its website the company linked above styles itself as "PYO Entertainment", "PYO Entertainment International, Inc.", and "Put Yourself Out", and never as "PYO Inc." on their webpage as far as I can see. ]<sup>]</sup>]</sub> 19:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' - Because of the inclusion of "INC" which roughly means "incorporated" which are used for company names..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:small;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span> 22:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *:Ah, so "''']'''" means "T, Incorporated"? I'd always wondered. Now, is it reasonably possible that "''']'''" might on occasion stand for anything '''else'''? -- ] <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 06:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow'''. The company in question does not appear to promote itself as PYOINC, so I'm led to believe that ]'s name is merely a coincidence. —] 14:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' - Username not necessarily affiliated with said company. ] ('']'') 17:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == {{user|Wilcoxandhall}} == | |||
| Refused by ]. ] ] 17:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' in good faith, any evidence that's who this person is editing as? - ]</small> (]) 17:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''weak allow''' not likely to be a coincidence, but I don't see any real danger ] 18:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow'''. "Usernames of or closely resembling the names of companies and groups are discouraged and may be blocked as a violation of Misplaced Pages policy against spamming and advertisement." ] 18:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' - per ] - ]<sup>]</sup> 18:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' Company name. --] <sup>]</sup><small>]<sub>] </sub></small> 19:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow'''. Obvious company name, different from my comment in Wickedsuperbikes above. ]<sup>]</sup>]</sub> 19:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' - as per ]..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:small;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span> 22:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow'''. Company name. Promotional. ] 13:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' - CHAIRBOY ] ('']'') 17:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == {{user|AMD64}} == | |||
| *The name of this user is the name of a well known product. Almost all of his contributions are AMD related. He could be working in AMD or something and trying to promote his company's products. --] 10:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' as per ]. ] 12:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow'''. Product name. Promotional. ] 13:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' as per ] and ]. It's a bit like a ] writing about hamburgers. Even if the user isn't associated with the company their name supports, they are promoting a product. ]<sup>]</sup>]</sub> 14:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' per above arguments. ] ] 16:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Disallow''' because of connection between name and edits. ] ('']'') 17:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == {{user|Ombudsman}} == | |||
| This username implies that the user holds some official position on Misplaced Pages. While Misplaced Pages doesn't have an ombudsman as far as I know, new users won't know that, and may incorrectly assume that ] is Misplaced Pages's official ombudsman for settling complaints. I hasten to say that I have no experience with ] and do not know whether he has actually used his name to assert authority over any dispute. However, I do note that . I think the community needs to discuss this username here. —] 15:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *<s>'''Disallow'''. Will create confusion as mentioned by ]. We would ban ] on sight; this is essentially the same. ]<sup>]</sup>]</sub> 15:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)</s> | |||
| :*'''Conditional Allow''' Change my vote. User's been here for years. However I agree with ]'s suggestion below. ]<sup>]</sup>]</sub> 16:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' - is not overly confusing. And, (per ] albeit), there are plenty of other usernames just as bad as this one. And I'm not so sure that comment by the IP wasn't trolling, the IP clearly knew the person did not have an official role. ]<sup>]·]</sup> 15:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Provisional allow'''. It seems like ] is a productive editor. I think the username issue could be settled by having ] place a prominent notice on his user page indicating that he is not the official ombudsman for Misplaced Pages. —] 16:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' this has been here before. There wasn't a single comment on it before, and it was removed after 2 days with an edit summary of "old news" ] 16:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :*There is also relevant discussion at ] ] 16:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' if userpage is modified, per ]. ] ] 16:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Conditional allow''' per Psychonaut. ]]<sup>]</sup> 16:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' I've notified Ombudsman of this discussion. Please remember folks. Thanks. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 16:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Allow''' I learned a new word today. I think a small notice on the userpage will clear this up. <small>]<sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 16:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *''''Allow'''. This is inventing a problem where none exists. --] (]) 16:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:15, 10 December 2024
Shortcuts
|
Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • Purge page cache |
This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Misplaced Pages's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:
- Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Misplaced Pages:Usernames for administrator attention.
- For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.
Do NOT post here if:
- the user in question has made no recent edits.
- you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy § Unblocking).
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
- has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
- has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
- is not already blocked.
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Misplaced Pages's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.
Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.
Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList
Reports
Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.
- Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.
Category: