Misplaced Pages

Talk:Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:06, 3 June 2023 editPaul Siebert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,740 edits Infobox deaths: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:47, 6 December 2024 edit undo95.109.249.40 (talk) Why not just call the article "Volhynian massacre": ReplyTag: Reply 
(71 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the ].{{pb}}}} The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the ].{{pb}}}}


{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=2|archive_units=months|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} {{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Ds/talk notice|topic=e-e}} {{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=e-e}}
{{Notice|{{find}}}} {{Notice|{{find}}}}
{{On this day|date1=2009-07-11|oldid1=301195866|date2=2011-07-11|oldid2=438912598|date3=2013-07-11|oldid3=563600413|date4=2016-07-11|oldid4=729279387|date5=2019-07-11|oldid5=905851579}} {{On this day|date1=2009-07-11|oldid1=301195866|date2=2011-07-11|oldid2=438912598|date3=2013-07-11|oldid3=563600413|date4=2016-07-11|oldid4=729279387|date5=2019-07-11|oldid5=905851579}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Poland {{WikiProject Poland|importance = Mid}}
{{WikiProject Ukraine|importance=mid}}
|class = C
{{WikiProject Soviet Union|importance=Mid |hist=yes |mil=yes |rus=yes|rus-importance=low }}
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = no
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes
|importance = Mid}}
{{WikiProject Ukraine|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Soviet Union|class=Start |importance=Mid
|hist=yes |mil=yes |rus=yes|rus-importance=low }}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=b |B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y |Polish=yes|German=yes|Russian=yes|WWII=yes }} {{WikiProject Military history|class=b |B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y |Polish=yes|German=yes|Russian=yes|WWII=yes }}
{{WikiProject Death|class=b|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Death|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Crime|class=C|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Disaster management|class=C|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement|class=C|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Law Enforcement|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Law|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=C|importance=mid}} {{WikiProject Sociology|importance=mid}}
}} }}
{{Refideas {{Refideas
Line 44: Line 35:
}} }}


== Inconsistent Cassaulty numbers in the same paragraph ==


The second paragraph in the introduction includes these two contradictory sentences back to back. Please fix this. I would but the article is locked. Thanks
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 December 2022 ==
"The UPA's actions resulted in up to 100,000 deaths. Estimates of the death toll range between 60,000 to 120,000. "
] (]) 08:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)


{{edit extended-protected|Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia|answered=yes}}
In "Classification as genocide - Polish view"," On 22 July 2016"should be " On 8 July 2016". Both resources were written on 8 July 2016. ] (]) 00:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 17:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> Done, with sources from article. ] (]) 17:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)


== Ambiguous lede == == Diversions and pacifications ==


In the section "Second World War", there is some very obfuscatory language used. "There were acts of diversion" is an evasive way of referring to deadly attacks. "The Polish side responded with pacifications, in which probably several hundred people were killed": This is a misuse of the word "pacification".
Lede consists of 3 paragraphs, mid paragraph currently reads:


These terms are euphemisms for illegal killings, and I propose to delete the subsection "Ukrainian diversion in September 1939". Perhaps someone familiar with the subject-matter could rewrite the subsection using more direct language. ] (]) 09:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
<blockquote>According to Timothy Snyder, the ethnic cleansing was a Ukrainian attempt to prevent the post-war Polish state from asserting its sovereignty over Ukrainian-majority areas that had been part of the prewar Polish state. Henryk Komański and Szczepan Siekierka write that the killings were directly linked to the policies of Stepan Bandera's faction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and its military arm, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, whose goal as specified at the Second Conference of the OUN-B on 17–23 February 1943 (March 1943 in some sources) was to purge all non-Ukrainians from the future Ukrainian state. The massacres led to a conflict between Polish resistance and Ukrainian insurgency in the German-occupied territories, with the Polish Home Army in Volhynia responding to the Ukrainian attacks, on a much smaller scale.</blockquote>


== Wrong cat ==
My reading of it is as an attempt to contrasts two views of the massacres.


Greetings @] , we can't justify having wrong categories with some other wrongs elsewhere (or here) .
# Snyder; "a Ukrainian attempt to prevent the post-war Polish state from asserting its sovereignty over Ukrainian-majority areas that had been part of the prewar Polish state."
# Henryk Komański and Szczepan Siekierka; "to purge all non-Ukrainians from the future Ukrainian state"


A better thing to spend our time on is to ask why is there no ] article. Is it only limited to ]? ] (]) 12:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't see how these views contrast nor how there is anything contentious in either statements. If they don't contrast and are not contentious, I don't see the need to namecheck authors or present them as such.


:@] Adding a parent category is correct if there is no relevant subcategory. That said, we can probably replace it by ]. Although massacres are not the same concept as war crimes, so I don't really see a problem with this. This was a massacre, and at some level of abstraction, it was committed by Ukraine, just like other ] were committed by other countries (now, I am not saying some entries there are wrong - I've just corrected a category for one execution, for example, which was not a "massacre"). <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 06:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
The purpose of the lede is to summarize.


== RfC on Category:Massacres committed by Ukraine ==
Can we simplify to .....=>


<!-- ] 10:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1724666467}}
<blockquote>The ethnic cleansing was a Ukrainian attempt to prevent the post-war Polish state from asserting its sovereignty over Ukrainian-majority areas that had been part of the prewar Polish state. The massacres led to a conflict between Polish resistance and Ukrainian insurgency in the German-occupied territories, with the Polish Home Army in Volhynia responding to the Ukrainian attacks, on a much smaller scale.</blockquote>
This cagegorization - characterizing the event as "Massacres committed by Ukraine" - is challenged. Nowhere in the article it says it "was committed by Ukraine", and no sources are saying so. I disagree with the thesis above ] that ''at some level of abstraction, it was committed by Ukraine'' but I'm the only one opposing. ] (]) 09:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)


== Changes in the article Lead and Section title ==
(It is already stated clearly in paragraph 1 that UPA were perpetrators of these atrocities). --] (]) 18:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


Since this article is only editable by established editors, could I ask for the incorporation of the following changes to the text that are more accurate:
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 February 2023 ==


*Change "The UPA's actions resulted in up to 100,000 deaths." to "The UPA's actions resulted in the death of around 100,000 Poles."
{{Edit extended-protected|Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia|answered=yes}}
"Many Ukrainians perceived the 2016 resolution as an "anti-Ukrainian gesture" in the context of Vladimir Putin's attempts to use the Volhynia issue to divide Poland and Ukraine in the context of the Russian–Ukrainian war"
Because this is just a feeling/opinion of a closer unknown person. The source was also not given ] (]) 22:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> It is sourced. {{tq|The Sejm’s resolution was interpreted by many Ukrainian politicians and journalists as an “anti-Ukrainian gesture” adopted in the particularly unfavourable moment of the military conflict in the Donbas region and conscious attempts of the Kremlin to use Volhynian topic to further complicate Polish-Ukrainian relations.}} The source even sources it. ] (]) 15:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)


*Remove: "The ruling Germans also actively encouraged both Ukrainians and Poles to kill each other." and from section title remove"...and the Ukrainian anti-German uprising".
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 February 2023 ==


The first statement is somewhat problematic because though the Germans might have instigated ethnic hatred on a lower level there is no evidence that they directly worked with UPA to organize the massacres, so this statement should not be included in the lead as it suggest the Germans were the co-organizers. Also, the second statement is problematic because UPA only operated in the Kresy region (now Western Ukraine) so this was not a Greater Ukrainian uprising and also its scope was very limited as UPA spent most of its time on attacking Poles and Soviet partisans. So, this is a very questionable claim especially to be used in a section title. ] (]) 17:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
{{Edit extended-protected|Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia|answered=yes}}
::Can someone provide reliable sources on the numbers of Poles killed during ] by Ukrainians in ] and ]?
Remove sentence as Failed verification/WP:SYNTH: "Others, including Waldemar Rezmer, use the word "Zagłada", originally applied to the Final Solution, to describe the massacres." - cannot attribute to Rezmer in the sources - note clear use Zagłada in source for "originally applied" but (source) instead says "previously reserved" - . Also note that Rezmer is alive so this can be considered defamatory.
::Thanks.
::] (]) 22:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)


::*], the problem with (the second half of) this Section title "and the Ukrainian anti-German uprising" is that there is no source which talks about an "Ukrainian anti-German uprising" instead you have texts related to various skirmishes between UPA and German military units, and that UPA's relationship with the German occupiers varied in different times, but no greater Ukrainian anti-German uprising. It's just not there (like with the ]). Also, UPA was just as much created in order to fight against Poles and the Soviets, however this section titles makes it sound like the primary reason for UPA's creation was anti-German insurgency.
Please look into Archive(12): " "zagłada" and "Zagłada" - when Capitonym happens ".- for more ] (]) 22:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> I have removed the unverifiable attribution. To be clear, I don't think the content in question would constitute defamation. If you disagree, consult ] and ] asap. ] (]) 14:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


:::Also, there is an on-line article, which describes this type of a situation, where statements are inserted into Misplaced Pages that have no academic consensus or a source, to back up their validity: https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/
== Infobox deaths ==


:::Example from the article of this type claims in Misplaced Pages:
A major article section surveys estimates of 10,000 to 30,000 Ukrainian dead among victims, yet they are absent from the infobox, which treats the subject as a one-sided attack and not a conflict with mass killing of civilians by more than one side. Even if that were deemed acceptable, the text tells us that a very large number of Ukrainians were among the victims of UPA, but they are omitted.


:::"In early November 2015, you will find K.e.coffman in “20 July plot,” an article about the failed plan by German officers to assassinate Hitler. A sentence has jumped out at her. It says that some of the conspirators came to see the plot as “a grand, if futile gesture” that would save “the honour of themselves, their families, the army and Germany.” The claim isn’t supported by any sources. It’s conjecture, hearsay. And to her it seems strangely flattering."
There’s a disconnect, belying ] “to summarize . . . key facts that appear in the article.” It’s like an infobox summarizing some other article, or restricted to only selected parts of this one. &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 13:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


:::Also, the second statement is problematic and should not be in the Lead "the ruling Germans also actively encouraged both Ukrainians and Poles to kill each other." This statement fails an accuracy check, based on what the sources actually say and could be considered as an overstatement. Also, other reliable sources like IPN say this "Thus, the Poles did not seek to create conflict situations." https://volhyniamassacre.eu/zw2/history/178,The-Genocide-on-Poles-Conducted-by-the-OUN-B-and-UPA.html this is why the statement should not be in the lead, as it's out of place, oversimplified, and its conclusion is disputed in academic discourse.
:That depends on how we define the article's topic, and ''by whom'' these Ukrainians were killed. I assume the article tells about the massacre of ''Poles'' by ''UPA''. If those Ukrainians were killed by UPA, then these figures definitely should be included. If those Ukrainians were killed by Poles, then we need to carefully think how to represent these facts.

:We mush avoid a broadly discredited concept of "''Second Polish-Ukrainian war''", which is being actively pushed by some Ukrainian sources, and which is totally rejected by the international scholarly community. ] (]) 16:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
:::Lastly, regarding this statement "The UPA's actions resulted in up to 100,000 deaths" the number whatever it is, should clearly say "Poles", not "people" as it creates confusion and the reader is left wondering if this is everyone, including Armenians, Jews, Russians, Czechs, Georgians or anti-UPA Ukrainians. Also, the sources already cited say this (source no. 10): "...a hundred thousand Poles perished." This statement needs to clearly say "Poles". --] (]) 05:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
::This is about the infobox reflecting the article’s current content, not re-determining and changing the topic. &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 13:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
:::::I've entered, into the article, the corrections you suggested.
:::I am not proposing to change the topic, I am asking how the topic is defined. ] (]) 15:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
:::::If I've overlooked anything or made an error, please let me know.
::::Well, the article’s coverage of the topic explicitly includes subsections on “Polish casualties” and “Ukrainian casualties,” with detailed surveys of both of their numbers in sources. The infobox lists “Deaths” of Poles and Czechs. So the summarizing of “key facts that appear in the article” has a very different emphasis by omitting part of that, without any rationale. Clear?
:::::Thanks for your contributions to improving the article.
::::You seemed to be implying that “by whom” someone was killed makes their deaths not key facts. Does the article or sources support such an assessment? &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 16:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
:::::Have you considered choosing, for use on Misplaced Pages, a pseudonym, which would facilitate communication with other editors?
:::::I think the key logic is that retribution killings are a part of this subject, and not divorced from it. Even if there were a complete article on them, it would remain part of this broader subject in summary style. There is no reason to omit them. &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 16:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
:::::Best,
::::::The question is simple: the infobox provides a list of perpetrators, and it is exhaustive. Therefore, if those 10,000-30,000 Ukrainians were murdered by someone from this list, these deaths should be included. However, if they were killed by somebody else, we cannot add them without expanding the list of perpetrators.
:::::] (]) 08:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
::::::However, if the we adjust the perpetrator list, the article's scope (and probably a title) should be probably modified too. However, before discussing that, please, answer who murdered those Ukrainians. ] (]) 16:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
], I just came across this statement that should also be adjusted "Local UPA commanders in Volhynia, joining the armed uprising against the Germans, began attacking the Polish population, committing massacres in numerous villages." The part "joining the armed uprising against the Germans" should be removed, it just sounds confusing and makes it sound as if the Poles were part of the German occupation. Poor wording in this case, confusing two separate issues. --] (]) 09:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::::You have the right to decline discussing this. &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 21:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
::Yes, I had noticed that clause but provisionally held off from deleting it. I've now deleted it. Thanks!
::::::::I find this your response aggressive and unfriendly.
::] (]) 20:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
::::::::In addition, you are missing the point: as I explained, the lists of the victims and perpetrators must be consistent: we must include all victims (irrespective to their ethnicity) provided that they were murdered by the perpetrators listed in the infobox. However, if we include some category of the victims that were killed by someone else (except by Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, Ukrainian Insurgent Army, Mykola Lebed, Roman Shukhevych), then the perpetrator list should be updated accordingly.
:Just to add, UPA fighting with the Germans, and anti-Polish killings, were two separate things however that statement confuses the two. --] (]) 09:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
::::::::If several thousands of Ukrainians were murdered by the same perpetrators that were killing the Poles (again, their list is: "''Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, Ukrainian Insurgent Army, Mykola Lebed, Roman Shukhevych''"), then I agree that these Ukrainian victims should be included. However, if they were killed by somebody else (e.g. by Polish self-defence), then the latter must be added to the list of the perpetrators.

::::::::In the latter case, I anticipate a huge problem: if we list both UPA and Polish self-defence in the perpetrators list, and we list both Ukrainians and Poles in the list of victims, then a reader may be completely confused: who was being murdered and by whom? Instead of providing a clear and brief summary, such an infobox would just confuse a reader. ] (]) 21:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
== Why not just call the article "Volhynian massacre" ==
::::::In addition, the estimates vary from 2 to 30 thousands, not 10-30, as you say. And many sources say that some of them were killed in 1946-47, whereas the infobox define the time of the event as 1943-45. All of that should be specified too, but, again, that may require an adjustment of the article's scope. ] (]) 17:51, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

:::::::2 thousand is an estimate for Volyn only. But I suppose if you want the infobox to offer the full range of estimates then you’d want to amend the “c. 100,000” in the infobox as well, right? &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 21:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to propose to rename the article to "Volhynian massacre", since that's what event is known as in Polish and Ukrainian (Rzeź wołyńska; Волинська трагедія). The historical event is commonly known by this name, and refered as such by historians.] (]) 22:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

:The article also covers related massacres in eastern Galicia.
:Also, have there been no other massacres in Volhynia, other than of Poles during World War II?
:] (]) 23:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
::@] It's still the WP: Common Name. And yeah, the topic might also include regions outside Volhynia, but that's how the event is known by historians and common people, since Volhynia was the most notable and central location. Common names aren't always the most accurate. Additionally, even if there are others (idk of top of my head), Volhynian massacre in WW2 is still the most known, and as such, would be a dominating name for this specific event, with other potencial events in Volhynian getting a disambiguation name. ] (]) 20:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
:::Thanks.
:::The Polish Misplaced Pages does title its article "'']''".
:::] (]) 23:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
:::: The Rzeż Wołyńska article talks about events in Volhynia and does not include Eastern Galicia in its scope. ] (]) 18:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
:Ukrainian "Volhynian tragedy" (Волинська трагедія) and Polish "Volhynian slaughter" (Rzeź wołyńska) - are not the same names. Your edit summary stated: "The event in both Polish and Ukrainian just known as "Volhynian massacre"" - that doesn't seem to be the case.
:The previous version was a longstanding name of the article that was changed without proper discussion and the time needed for other editors to get involved. Because it's a controversial topic, there should be voting on whether to move the page or not. ] (]) 17:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
:Because this article is not for truth and memory. It is Polish ultranationalist propaganda brochure that absolutely ignore Ukrainian historians, Ukrainian views, and any views critical to Polish new trend on whitewashing of Polish war criminals. And attack is a better way to defend, so Poland attack Ukraine to distract attention from Polish war crimes in interwar period, against Belarusians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians, Slovaks, Czechs,Jews, Germans and others. For Misplaced Pages, if a lot of Polish insane nationalist come to talk page - then they right. ] (]) 20:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:47, 6 December 2024

Skip to table of contents
Commons-emblem-issue.svgWARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations (9 May 2021): The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on July 11, 2009, July 11, 2011, July 11, 2013, July 11, 2016, and July 11, 2019.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPoland Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUkraine Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSoviet Union: Russia / History / Military Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Russia (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: European / German / Polish / Russian & Soviet / World War II
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
German military history task force
Taskforce icon
Polish military history task force
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force
WikiProject iconDeath Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDisaster management Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Enforcement Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSociology Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:


Inconsistent Cassaulty numbers in the same paragraph

The second paragraph in the introduction includes these two contradictory sentences back to back. Please fix this. I would but the article is locked. Thanks "The UPA's actions resulted in up to 100,000 deaths. Estimates of the death toll range between 60,000 to 120,000. " 104.246.224.162 (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)


Diversions and pacifications

In the section "Second World War", there is some very obfuscatory language used. "There were acts of diversion" is an evasive way of referring to deadly attacks. "The Polish side responded with pacifications, in which probably several hundred people were killed": This is a misuse of the word "pacification".

These terms are euphemisms for illegal killings, and I propose to delete the subsection "Ukrainian diversion in September 1939". Perhaps someone familiar with the subject-matter could rewrite the subsection using more direct language. MrDemeanour (talk) 09:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Wrong cat

Greetings @Piotrus , we can't justify having wrong categories with some other wrongs elsewhere (or here) .

A better thing to spend our time on is to ask why is there no Polish culture article. Is it only limited to Poland? ManyAreasExpert (talk) 12:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

@Manyareasexpert Adding a parent category is correct if there is no relevant subcategory. That said, we can probably replace it by Category:War crimes committed by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. Although massacres are not the same concept as war crimes, so I don't really see a problem with this. This was a massacre, and at some level of abstraction, it was committed by Ukraine, just like other Category:Massacres committed by countries were committed by other countries (now, I am not saying some entries there are wrong - I've just corrected a category for one execution, for example, which was not a "massacre"). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

RfC on Category:Massacres committed by Ukraine

This cagegorization - characterizing the event as "Massacres committed by Ukraine" - is challenged. Nowhere in the article it says it "was committed by Ukraine", and no sources are saying so. I disagree with the thesis above Talk:Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia#Wrong cat that at some level of abstraction, it was committed by Ukraine but I'm the only one opposing. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Changes in the article Lead and Section title

Since this article is only editable by established editors, could I ask for the incorporation of the following changes to the text that are more accurate:

  • Change "The UPA's actions resulted in up to 100,000 deaths." to "The UPA's actions resulted in the death of around 100,000 Poles."
  • Remove: "The ruling Germans also actively encouraged both Ukrainians and Poles to kill each other." and from section title remove"...and the Ukrainian anti-German uprising".

The first statement is somewhat problematic because though the Germans might have instigated ethnic hatred on a lower level there is no evidence that they directly worked with UPA to organize the massacres, so this statement should not be included in the lead as it suggest the Germans were the co-organizers. Also, the second statement is problematic because UPA only operated in the Kresy region (now Western Ukraine) so this was not a Greater Ukrainian uprising and also its scope was very limited as UPA spent most of its time on attacking Poles and Soviet partisans. So, this is a very questionable claim especially to be used in a section title. 94.172.109.57 (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Can someone provide reliable sources on the numbers of Poles killed during World War II by Ukrainians in Volhynia and eastern Galicia?
Thanks.
Nihil novi (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Nihil novi, the problem with (the second half of) this Section title "and the Ukrainian anti-German uprising" is that there is no source which talks about an "Ukrainian anti-German uprising" instead you have texts related to various skirmishes between UPA and German military units, and that UPA's relationship with the German occupiers varied in different times, but no greater Ukrainian anti-German uprising. It's just not there (like with the Slovak National Uprising). Also, UPA was just as much created in order to fight against Poles and the Soviets, however this section titles makes it sound like the primary reason for UPA's creation was anti-German insurgency.
Also, there is an on-line article, which describes this type of a situation, where statements are inserted into Misplaced Pages that have no academic consensus or a source, to back up their validity: https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/
Example from the article of this type claims in Misplaced Pages:
"In early November 2015, you will find K.e.coffman in “20 July plot,” an article about the failed plan by German officers to assassinate Hitler. A sentence has jumped out at her. It says that some of the conspirators came to see the plot as “a grand, if futile gesture” that would save “the honour of themselves, their families, the army and Germany.” The claim isn’t supported by any sources. It’s conjecture, hearsay. And to her it seems strangely flattering."
Also, the second statement is problematic and should not be in the Lead "the ruling Germans also actively encouraged both Ukrainians and Poles to kill each other." This statement fails an accuracy check, based on what the sources actually say and could be considered as an overstatement. Also, other reliable sources like IPN say this "Thus, the Poles did not seek to create conflict situations." https://volhyniamassacre.eu/zw2/history/178,The-Genocide-on-Poles-Conducted-by-the-OUN-B-and-UPA.html this is why the statement should not be in the lead, as it's out of place, oversimplified, and its conclusion is disputed in academic discourse.
Lastly, regarding this statement "The UPA's actions resulted in up to 100,000 deaths" the number whatever it is, should clearly say "Poles", not "people" as it creates confusion and the reader is left wondering if this is everyone, including Armenians, Jews, Russians, Czechs, Georgians or anti-UPA Ukrainians. Also, the sources already cited say this (source no. 10): "...a hundred thousand Poles perished." This statement needs to clearly say "Poles". --94.172.109.57 (talk) 05:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
I've entered, into the article, the corrections you suggested.
If I've overlooked anything or made an error, please let me know.
Thanks for your contributions to improving the article.
Have you considered choosing, for use on Misplaced Pages, a pseudonym, which would facilitate communication with other editors?
Best,
Nihil novi (talk) 08:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Nihil novi, I just came across this statement that should also be adjusted "Local UPA commanders in Volhynia, joining the armed uprising against the Germans, began attacking the Polish population, committing massacres in numerous villages." The part "joining the armed uprising against the Germans" should be removed, it just sounds confusing and makes it sound as if the Poles were part of the German occupation. Poor wording in this case, confusing two separate issues. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 09:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I had noticed that clause but provisionally held off from deleting it. I've now deleted it. Thanks!
Nihil novi (talk) 20:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Just to add, UPA fighting with the Germans, and anti-Polish killings, were two separate things however that statement confuses the two. --94.172.109.57 (talk) 09:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Why not just call the article "Volhynian massacre"

Hi, I would like to propose to rename the article to "Volhynian massacre", since that's what event is known as in Polish and Ukrainian (Rzeź wołyńska; Волинська трагедія). The historical event is commonly known by this name, and refered as such by historians.Artemis Andromeda (talk) 22:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

The article also covers related massacres in eastern Galicia.
Also, have there been no other massacres in Volhynia, other than of Poles during World War II?
Nihil novi (talk) 23:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
@Nihil novi It's still the WP: Common Name. And yeah, the topic might also include regions outside Volhynia, but that's how the event is known by historians and common people, since Volhynia was the most notable and central location. Common names aren't always the most accurate. Additionally, even if there are others (idk of top of my head), Volhynian massacre in WW2 is still the most known, and as such, would be a dominating name for this specific event, with other potencial events in Volhynian getting a disambiguation name. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks.
The Polish Misplaced Pages does title its article "Rzeź wołyńska".
Nihil novi (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
The Rzeż Wołyńska article talks about events in Volhynia and does not include Eastern Galicia in its scope. Hedviberit (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Ukrainian "Volhynian tragedy" (Волинська трагедія) and Polish "Volhynian slaughter" (Rzeź wołyńska) - are not the same names. Your edit summary stated: "The event in both Polish and Ukrainian just known as "Volhynian massacre"" - that doesn't seem to be the case.
The previous version was a longstanding name of the article that was changed without proper discussion and the time needed for other editors to get involved. Because it's a controversial topic, there should be voting on whether to move the page or not. Hedviberit (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Because this article is not for truth and memory. It is Polish ultranationalist propaganda brochure that absolutely ignore Ukrainian historians, Ukrainian views, and any views critical to Polish new trend on whitewashing of Polish war criminals. And attack is a better way to defend, so Poland attack Ukraine to distract attention from Polish war crimes in interwar period, against Belarusians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians, Slovaks, Czechs,Jews, Germans and others. For Misplaced Pages, if a lot of Polish insane nationalist come to talk page - then they right. 95.109.249.40 (talk) 20:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: