| Revision as of 18:53, 19 March 2007 editFiggyBee (talk | contribs)4,641 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:33, 1 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''<span style="color:red;">d</span>elete'''. - ] 09:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced ] <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced ] <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' it seems a little ] to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least ''exists''). ] 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' it seems a little ] to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least ''exists''). ] 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Doesn't appear to meet ]. ] 11:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Speedy delete per CSD:A7'''. "An internet provider in Queensland" is not an assertion of notability. <span style="font-family:serif;font-size:120%">''']''' ]</span> 22:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 11:33, 1 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
AaNet
Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced Betacommand 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment it seems a little WP:POINT to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least exists). FiggyBee 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. PCock 11:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per CSD:A7. "An internet provider in Queensland" is not an assertion of notability. Αργυριου (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.