Misplaced Pages

User talk:Aryan330: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:05, 5 July 2023 editAryan330 (talk | contribs)495 edits Kindly respond: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:13, 7 April 2024 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators760,381 edits Notification: speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Vani.Tag: Twinkle 
(32 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


== May 2023 == == Kindly respond ==


Please use TAlkpage of Sambhaji or Soyarabai to continue the discussion and not the Mughal-Maratha wars.Thanks. ] (]) 15:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
] Hello, I'm ]. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a ]. Your recent edit to ] seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> ] (]) 18:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


:@] but on that talk page no need to improve because they didn't have any unconstructive edits,only Mughal-Maratha wars contain it which itself added just 5 days ago by Fowler & fowler.
:Ok understood ] (]) 18:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
:So kindly look my reply on that talk page.
:Thanks ] (]) 16:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


== Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion ==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of an ] decision. The thread is ''']'''. <!--Template:AE-notice--> Thank you. <span class="nowrap">— ] &#91;] '''·''' ]&#93;</span> 07:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


== August 2023 ==
:@] No,I am not
:I just undid the unconstructive edits of user @] which had no references, without providing sources he blanked whole result section with sources which provided in that.
:I am not anti Mughal or anything but I just want to say that keep stayed what that was earlier or provide sources for your edit..
:& That is not vandalism absolutely because vandalism is done by @]. He should discuss on talk page!
:I just undid it stored to earlier edit!
:That's it ] (]) 05:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
::There has been long discussion about the results on talk page so don't make these baseless claims. Read ]. ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 05:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
:::I didn't make any claime though!
:::You are trying to divert this discussion without taking action on @]!
:::Check your talk page ] (]) 06:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ''']''' <sup>('']'')</sup> 11:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 15:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 16:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


== Blasphemy ==
== Unjustified warnings and incorrect removal of {{t1|cn}} tags ==


I saw your comments in the ANI thread. I think the user you reported deserves sanction, but not for the reasons you brought up.
Aryan330, the you left at {{u|Ajayraj890}}'s userpage accusing them of disruption, vandalism and edit-warring was unjustified. The user's adding of the {{t1|cn}} tags to the was perfectly fine. And your removal of the tags from the (without adding any ]) and from the (while adding a wrongly formatted citation in the wrong place; fwiw I couldn't verify that that citation supported the infobox numbers) was what was in error.{{pb}}
Please slow down, ''learn'' wikipedia policies and norms, ask for ] when unsure, etc instead of edit-warring and warning users incorrectly. Your current path will simply lead to further sanctions. ] (]) 13:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC) {{small|(Fixed link to ]. ] (]) 13:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC))}}


Even if you think the comment was an attack on an Indian god (it is not obvious that it was an attack), there is no policy or guideline on wikipedia that prevents blasphemy. Indeed, many articles (like having photos of Muhammad in his article) would be considered egregious, but are permitted. There is also no "protection against being offended" ; Even if what someone says offends you it, we do not ].
:I have reverted your two edits. Please take it to the respective article talkpage and list the specific source(s) (with exact page number) that you believe support the tagged claims. I'll be happy to help you format the addition of the citations to the article at that point. ] (]) 13:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:@]
:I just want to say that he should discuss first on talk page,as he said "it seems that strength is exaggerated" if it seems then he should give his evidence in talk page instead of directly adding citation tags as references are alreadyprovidedin reference section!
:yes I should not add as "Disruption" I will take care of it further.
:Thank you & kindly respond me on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/1163057724] (]) 13:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


If you explicitly abuse a religion, it might be sanctionable, but tangential stuff like references to gods is not by any means prohibited.
::Again, Ajayraj890's tagging and comment ''were'' perfectly correct. The ] (click that link!) is on those seeking to retain content in the article to provide proper citations. ] (]) 13:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::@] Ok, understood!
:::I need your help to do so as on mobile visual edits we couldn't able to mark Reference on battle template neither we able to cite some another source on reference list that's why I cant able to cite the link of bendre on reference list.that's why I removed that by saying that it is already present on references as they are present but I was unable to mark that on that place in template where citation needed.
:::Till then, kindly respond me on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/1163057724 ] (]) 13:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::: You needn't worry about citation template formatting for the moment. Just post a comment on the relevant '''article talkpage''' specifying the reference in plain text (as in, {{tq|Book X by Author Y says on Page N that "blah ..."}}, if a URL is available, that's helpful but not necessary) and other editors involved editors can object or ask questions if needed.
:::: As for the : I'll let editors in that discussion respond since I haven't looked into Laine or Kincaid yet. ] (]) 14:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::@]
:::::I would glad if you personally look into it as from some days many one sided users trying hard to let their side's positive side in light.it should look from neutral point of view!
:::::So look personally for me.
:::::Thanks ] (]) 14:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::The article should be in a neutral point of view. Avoid the ] in the paragraphs and cite much source as you can. You can't display anything without reliable sources. And since the article is in English, provide sources from English language as it makes the readers more comfortable. ] (]) 14:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::] Thank you ] (]) 15:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::You have said that the references are already provided in the Reference section. But, the citation doesn't point to the infobox numbers. And please provide ] sources. You have provided three sources for your article ]. One of them doesn't redirect to any links. And the Author of another source is BR Kamble. I haven't found any articles of that person. Moreover, the name of the source 'Studies in Shivaji and His Times. Shivaji University'. Is totally one sided. You haven't provided any other sources for this article. ] (]) 13:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::@]
:::As i mentioned above I couldn't able to cite that reference's link appropriately due to technical reasons.
:::although "Shivaji and times" is not one sided source as information about battle can't be of one sided!
:::In that way Audrey Trushkey's Aurangzeb the man and myth is also one sided but even that it's present on important Misplaced Pages articles! ] (]) 13:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::Even if both of the sources are from a neutral point of view, you have to provide the more reliable , conserved sources that support your claim.
::::I never said that the result of the battle is wrong. Since you haven't provided much sources that could support the statement on 'strength' in the infobox that have made, you can't make such a claim. If you provide some more sources (from a neutral point of view), I will cite that for you. ] (]) 14:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::@]
:::::I had already said I didn't able to cite because of some technical reasons.
:::::I will add it as it is not difficult as many sources claim about this battle it's just to wait for resolve that technical reasons. ] (]) 14:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::You can name the sources. Can't you? I am not aganist the view of result of this battle. I am talking about the strength you have mentioned in the infobox. You should provide reliable sources for that. You can simply name that to me. I can cite them. ] (]) 14:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::::@]
:::::::Thank you but I will add myself as it's additional sources, till now you can cite shivaji and his times for Battle of Umberkhind & indrajit sawant's for Battle of pawankhind.
:::::::1)For Umberkhind I found out that someone edited the Mughals Numbers from "30000" to "50000" which is absolutely wrong as all sources which mentioned this battle including ] mentioned mughal numbers as "30000" not "50000" instead that all numbers are right.you can change it by removing citation tag by citing my mentioned respective sources & Don't worry I will provide more and more sources further!
:::::::2) For Battle of Pawankhind Maratha Strength in all sources mentioned as "300" not "600" as mentioned in battle template that you can change by removing citation tag and citing source which I mentioned,I will add more sources to this article also soon..
:::::::Again I had not edited that templates as you mentioned..
As I suggested you to edit it's clearly can say that I have neutral point of view because I mentioned fault from both sides at battle of Umberkhind,it's Mughal Numbers exaggerated and at battle of Pawankhind Maratha numbers are exaggerated as I mentioned above.
Happy edit
:::::::Thank you,
:::::::You can edit as mentioned above. ] (]) 15:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::::Shivaji and his times, written by JADUNATH SARKAR. Is this the reference? If yes, provide the page number. ] (]) 15:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::@] As i am not able to find that battle on Shivaji and his times because on Google book many pages are missing because of some error as this is not common.
:::::::::But till now you can add citation on ] by using another source '''Maratha Generals and Personalities: A gist of great personalities of Marathas. (2014). (n.p.): Pratik gupta.''' there you can found it on page number 127 ] (]) 16:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::Okay, but I just found something now. The second reference <sup><big>परमानंद, कवींद्र. श्री शिवभारत. भारत इतिहास संशोधन मंडळ,पुणे. pp. Page 291, 292. Does not mention about the Battle. Please provide the page number of first reference.</big></sup> ] (]) 16:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::@] which first reference? ] (]) 16:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::B. R. Kamble (1982). Studies in Shivaji and His Times. And I just found that the second reference doesn't mention the battle. Should i hand over this case to an administrator? I think you have to move this page to Draft space and should request for a review. ] (]) 16:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::@] No as only due to citing errors we can't do that as this battle is renowned and mentioned in many sources and books!
:::::::::::::I said you to add reference which I mentioned till nowMaratha Generals and Personalities: A gist of great personalities of Marathas. (2014). (n.p.): Pratik gupta. ] (]) 16:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::::@] Check Page number '''341'''& '''345''' of second reference परमानंद, कवींद्र. श्री शिवभारत. भारत इतिहास संशोधन मंडळ,पुणे.
::::::::::::::On last line of 341 it's clearly mentioned about '''Kartalab khan'''
::::::::::::::& On 342-345 it's mentioned about shivaji's action in this battle ] (]) 16:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::Wait. Do you consider this as a reference to cite a Misplaced Pages article? I prefer you to read ] before citing any sources. This reads like a fairytale. None of the other sources mentions about their conversation or anything. I think you should have a conversation with ]. He/She will make you understand the problem with this article clearly. ] (]) 16:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::::It is not such a case. My articles were taken down many times. The reasons were lack of resources, lack of context, containing peacock terms etc. I checked the reference you have given now (Maratha Generals and Personalities: A gist of great personalities of Marathas. (2014). (n.p.): Pratik gupta.) and some other sources. None of them have an accurate conclusion about the strength. And i couldn't find any older sources that depicts this battle. Since this article doesn't have a reliable source, there are some limitations. I can edit this page completely giving result as Maratha victory as it should be. But i would be have to remove the strength tag since none of the reliable sources mentions that. Else we could move it to draft space and wait for a review. That would be a better idea in my opinion. ] (]) 16:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::@]
:::::::::::::::I already said you to check page number '''127''' of Maratha Generals and Personalities: A gist of great personalities of Marathas. (2014). (n.p.): Pratik gupta.there it's clearly mentioned that Mughals strength was of 30000 soldiers don't say wrong if haven't checked it!
:::::::::::::::on mentioned sources it's clearly mentioned so removing it can't be done to cause ].
:::::::::::::::As you said that instead of me you would like to cite it then it's only because I have given you this information otherwise I will be citing it in some days immediately after my technical error will resolve but because you said that you would like to help me thats why I am saying you to do so.
:::::::::::::::Note:- even if sources are not correct and you have added citation tag then editer can provide sources even after some months you can't remove it immediately as per Misplaced Pages policy!
:::::::::::::::& here the sources are also present so there is no point to remove it.
:::::::::::::::If would like to help me then cite it if would not then I will cite it within some days.
:::::::::::::::Thank you ] (]) 16:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::@] the source B. R. Kamble (1982). Studies in Shivaji and His Times is praised by '''Cambridge press''' & the source Maratha Generals and Personalities: A gist of great personalities of Marathas. (2014). (n.p.): Pratik gupta.) had no challenge till now for its accurate historical information with evidences. ] (]) 17:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::Maratha Generals and Personalities: A gist of great personalities of Marathas. (2014) is not a reliable source. Atleast you should have read the cover page of the book! ] (]) 17:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::I hope you read the cover page of 'Maratha Generals and Personalities'. Its source is Misplaced Pages itself. Didn't you notice it till today? It is not a reliable source. ] (]) 17:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


In the ANI thread, you may have gotten a bit worked up over what you see as an insult to your religion. However, the long paragraphs, that dont rest on policy are honestly a bit annoying and will likely attract sanctions on you if you keep doing it. Take a step back, calm down a bit, and comment on policy basis if you think necessary. And keep comments short. ] (]) 14:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
== Kindly respond ==
== Alert for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan related articles ==


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
Please use TAlkpage of Sambhaji or Soyarabai to continue the discussion and not the Mughal-Maratha wars.Thanks. ] (]) 15:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


You have shown interest in '''], ], and ].''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic.
:@] but on that talk page no need to improve because they didn't have any unconstructive edits,only Mughal-Maratha wars contain it which itself added just 5 days ago by Fowler & fowler.

:So kindly look my reply on that talk page.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
:Thanks ] (]) 16:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
}}] (]) 01:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

== Arbitration enforcement warning ==

As a result of ], I am giving you a ] warning to 1) read ] and stop referring to good-faith edits as vandalism and 2) not engage in excessive discussion of content or conduct issues on unrelated pages (in particular, ]). Continuing to do either of these things may result in blocks or other sanctions without further warning. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">&#91;]&#93;</sup> <small>(she&#124;they&#124;xe)</small> 02:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 1==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- (&nbsp;|&nbsp;)-->. Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 06:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

== ] moved to draftspace ==

Thanks for your contributions to ]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at ].
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] (]) 18:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

:@] read ] before making citations. ] (]) 03:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

== Maratha raid on Delhi (1737) ==

Hello, I've noticed that you removed the "move" tag from the ]. It's important to remember that tags shouldn't be simply removed; instead, it's more constructive to engage in the discussion on the . ] (]) 14:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

== November 2023 ==
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for long-term ], ]—most recently, filing ] against a topic-area opponent. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's ], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;<span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">&#91;]&#93;</sup> <small>(they&#124;xe&#124;she)</small> 16:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef -->
* This is about the SPI, but it's also about the warning I gave you above for similarly inflammatory conduct in the topic area, and it's also about the fact that almost every edit you've ever made has been about arguing with people over the Mughal–Maratha Wars. I considered just ] you but I couldn't convince myself that you are capable of editing constructively in other topic areas, given what I've seen of your edits so far. I'm open to being convinced that I'm' wrong. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">&#91;]&#93;</sup> <small>(they&#124;xe&#124;she)</small> 16:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

==Concern regarding ]==
] Hello, Aryan330. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 22:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
==Your draft article, ]==
]

Hello, Aryan330. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:13, 7 April 2024

Kindly respond

Please use TAlkpage of Sambhaji or Soyarabai to continue the discussion and not the Mughal-Maratha wars.Thanks. Jonathansammy (talk) 15:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

@Jonathansammy but on that talk page no need to improve because they didn't have any unconstructive edits,only Mughal-Maratha wars contain it which itself added just 5 days ago by Fowler & fowler.
So kindly look my reply on that talk page.
Thanks Aryan330 (talk) 16:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Melechha. Thank you. — SamX 07:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Maratha–Portuguese War (1683–1684) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wareno (talk) 15:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Blasphemy

I saw your comments in the ANI thread. I think the user you reported deserves sanction, but not for the reasons you brought up.

Even if you think the comment was an attack on an Indian god (it is not obvious that it was an attack), there is no policy or guideline on wikipedia that prevents blasphemy. Indeed, many articles (like having photos of Muhammad in his article) would be considered egregious, but are permitted. There is also no "protection against being offended" ; Even if what someone says offends you it, we do not WP:CENSOR.

If you explicitly abuse a religion, it might be sanctionable, but tangential stuff like references to gods is not by any means prohibited.

In the ANI thread, you may have gotten a bit worked up over what you see as an insult to your religion. However, the long paragraphs, that dont rest on policy are honestly a bit annoying and will likely attract sanctions on you if you keep doing it. Take a step back, calm down a bit, and comment on policy basis if you think necessary. And keep comments short. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Alert for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan related articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SKAG123 (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement warning

As a result of this Arbitration Enforcement thread, I am giving you a logged warning to 1) read WP:VAND and stop referring to good-faith edits as vandalism and 2) not engage in excessive discussion of content or conduct issues on unrelated pages (in particular, User talk:SamX). Continuing to do either of these things may result in blocks or other sanctions without further warning. -- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 02:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Purandar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Purandar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Vani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Vani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

@Aryan330 read WP:RAJ before making citations. Ajayraj890 (talk) 03:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Maratha raid on Delhi (1737)

Hello, I've noticed that you removed the "move" tag from the Battle of Delhi (1737). It's important to remember that tags shouldn't be simply removed; instead, it's more constructive to engage in the discussion on the Talk page. Ajayraj890 (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term battleground behavior, against the interests of the encyclopedia—most recently, filing a retaliatory SPI against a topic-area opponent. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin (they|xe|she) 16:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
  • This is about the SPI, but it's also about the warning I gave you above for similarly inflammatory conduct in the topic area, and it's also about the fact that almost every edit you've ever made has been about arguing with people over the Mughal–Maratha Wars. I considered just topic-banning you but I couldn't convince myself that you are capable of editing constructively in other topic areas, given what I've seen of your edits so far. I'm open to being convinced that I'm' wrong. -- Tamzin (they|xe|she) 16:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Vani

Information icon Hello, Aryan330. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Vani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Vani

Hello, Aryan330. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Vani".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 21:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)