Misplaced Pages

Talk:Wallace Fard Muhammad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:16, 6 July 2023 editFeoffer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,476 edits WD Fard was probably no immigrant← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:01, 27 December 2024 edit undoPARAKANYAA (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers43,575 edits Structuring: ReplyTag: Reply 
(86 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}} {{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=180|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} {{Talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(180d) | algo=old(180d)
| archive=Talk:Wallace Fard Muhammad/Archive %(counter)d | archive=Talk:Wallace Fard Muhammad/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=2 | counter=3
| maxarchivesize=20T | maxarchivesize=20T
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} | archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
Line 10: Line 10:
| minthreadstoarchive=3 | minthreadstoarchive=3
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|blp=no|listas=Fard, Wallace|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no {{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|importance=mid}}
|class=B
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=Mid}}
|listas=Fard, Wallace
{{WikiProject African diaspora|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Mid|NRM=yes|NRMImp=High|Religiousleaders=yes}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low}}
}} }}
{{WikiProject United States|class=B|importance=low|listas=Fard, Wallace}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|class=B|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Illinois|class=B|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject African diaspora|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Religion|class=B|importance=Mid}}
}}
== Birthdate Changes: Believing that Fard is one of the FBI Leads ==

Unless you are an NOI fundy (and therefore have your whole faith to lose), you know that ALL the evidence suggests that WD Ford is WD Fard. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I am the original writer of the current Wallace Fard Muhammad page. Years ago, I came to the page and saw that it was based entirely upon a couple of sources, and those sources basically read the FBI file - developed their own personal belief as to Fard’s identity - then wrote a book outlining their belief. When people come to this subject, they usually fall into one of three camps: 1) People who do not claim to know Fard’s real identity; 2) People who believe strongly that one of the various leads in the FBI file is Fard; and 3) People who believe that Fard is who Elijah Muhammad represented him to be.

When editing Fard’s birthday on this page, for many years, some have chosen to place one of the birthdates of one of the leads from the FBI file (with a note that no one knows the exact birthdate). This approach makes no sense. The FBI concluded that they do not know Fard’s birthdate - after all of their efforts. Further, they internally made it clear that they themselves did not believe that Fard was any of the leads that they developed. Whenever they publicized one of the various identities, claiming that the lead was Fard, internally they stated that their sole purpose was to discredit Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam.

Whenever someone supports the Nation of Islam, they want to “correct the record” by stating that Fard’s birthdate is 1877. Whenever someone believes that Fard is one of the FBI leads, they want to say that his birthdate is one of the lead’s birthdates.

What should actually be placed on this page? Obviously, the footnote should continue to state what it currently states about the date not being known. But when a date is placed on the page, the date that Fard CLAIMED should be the date that is present. I understand that many editors believe that Fard is either this lead found by the FBI or that lead found by the FBI. But that’s your opinion. Any book on the subject can only give some other person’s opinion based upon the same source. So all that there is to say is this: Fard claimed to have been born in 1877 - his actual birthdate is not known for certain. All readers then have a chance to look at the FBI history for themselves. And they can then decide if they believe that one of the FBI leads is Fard. The fact that Fard claimed that his birthdate is 1877 is not disputed and is widely known. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Efforts to trace Fard's history== ==Efforts to trace Fard's history==
Line 61: Line 47:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ0lnqQPybM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ0lnqQPybM


== Excessive detail in Efforts to trace Fard's origin and fate section ==
== Ahmadi Connection Is Uncertain ==

The efforts of one editor to link the Ahamadi movement to Wallace is scrupulous and easily debatable.

Wallace’s ancestral origins are unknown, with some claiming him to be Arab (among the NOI), New Zealander (among the FBI, Pakistani, Afghan, etc. His knowledge and connection to the South Asian originated Ahmadiyya movement is an interesting theory but not one indisputably supported by data and evidence. ] (]) 01:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

== WD Fard was probably no immigrant ==

The YouTuber "Resume Byron", who puts a lot of effort in tracing the roots of WD Fard and his person in general, released a clip five months ago, where he establishes the the theory that Fard wasn't foreign at all, but a native of Jasper, Texas.

He and his family did belong to the group of mixed-race people, which were not considered White nor Black, but were labeled as "mullatos". The mullato community of this area existed outside of the Black and White scheme and they usually did intermarry. Besides some that could "pass as Whites", because of their physical appearance.

This hypothesis, which is based on Census reports, would shake the foundations of basically every theory there was before.

I encourage everyone to have a look on this clip and also the prior work of "Resume Byron".

I can't post the link because YouTube is blacklisted, but the name of the clip is "Wallace Fard Was not Foreign" by the user "Resume Byron".

It's really worth a watch and the time, if you're interested in the "mysterious" past of Fard.

This theory is completely new to me and I don't think it was ever discussed here. Even by doing a quick Google research, the only time I saw it being mentioned was in a subreddit 27th December of 2021. And I don't know where the user that made this post had it's infos. But it gives a hint that someone came up with this before.


It seems to me that there is an excessive amount of detail about the lives of people who have been speculated to be Fard. For example, I don't see how it is relevant to the article or useful to the reader to know about the vacation which Fred Dodd took. In addition, there is nothing in the article explaining a link between Fred Walldad and Fard, and I can't find anything online.
While the documentation, by the 1910 US Census, that there was a mullato named Wallace Fard and had at least one son is rock solid, one has to decide if this was the first official record of "WD Fard". The founder of the Nation of Islam.


Well, I hope that there will be a discussion about it. ] (]) 11:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC) I'm not an expert and I don't want to unilaterally remove information, but it seems to me that this section could use some cleaning up. Other input would be appreciated. ] (]) 14:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


:I actually anticipated this concern. Whole books have been written about Fard's origins, and our readers should be able to learn about the contents of those books -- but on the other hand, even if Fard really was a Tamale vendor in Oregon earlier in life, what does it matter to his legacy?
:YouTube is not blacklisted, the links above work. But it is rarely considered a reliable source. When it is it's usually something like a major newspapers YouTube site. I see no reason to see the person making those videos can possibly meet ] even if he used his own name (which I found but found nothing about him). And we can't do our own research. ] ] 11:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
:John Andrew Morrow has written about virtually every possible origin for Fard, and one of them is definitely that he was a "white passing" American with black ancestry. Writing up Morrow's scholarship is on my to-do list, and I'll look at Resume Byron's videos to see if they have RSes inside them we could potentially use. ] (]) 22:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC) :I didn't know if anyone would have this concern but myself, but now that you have shared it, my proposal would be to split off this content in to a subarticle about Fard's origins, so that the casual reader of the biography doesn't have to get mired down in details that the historians document. Does that plan sound good to you? ] (]) 23:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
:A year late to the party but what happened to this guy and where he's from does not seem undue weight to me, as so many works seem to exclusively focus on it. Honestly it's probably enough to sustain its own article on a purely GNG basis, though I'm not sure if that's the best way to organize it strictly. Could be. ] (]) 09:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
::@] I should have looked at this first I guess before replying to you elsewhere. Of course that makes sense. Morrow, I'm not completely sure about. His full professorship is from a community college. I can't find much about the "Covenants Foundation" other than that he directs it. I see a book of his is ''Covenants of the Prophet with the Christians of the World'', a hard to find (for me at least) book by this publisher and see for which we have no article. ] ] 07:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
:::''Finding W.D. Fard'' is published by ] and Morrow does cite his own sources. So far as I'm aware, (but I'm not yet up to speed) Morrow doesn't reach any definitive conclusions of his own (in contrast to the Byron video that makes a strong thesis statement USING material from Morrow). If Morrow says things that ever conflict with mainstream scholarship, obviously we should weight accordingly.
:::If you have sources you think is more-definitive than the Morrow book, I'm open to them. I'm new-ish to the subject. ] (]) 07:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
::::@] CSP isn't a reliable source. It's article casts doubt on it and discussions at RSN have mainly said either don't use it at all, or only on a case by case basis. And at best ] would apply, ie if only Morrow says it, we shouldn't use it. ] ] 09:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::Thanks for the info about CSP! My bad! Yeah, it sounds like Morrow is only useful when he can link us to the writings of more-reputable scholars -- turns out his degree was in Spanish Lit?!? ] (]) 09:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
::I should reiterate -- Doug Weller is completely correct when he says it's not a Reliable Source we could use directly. ] (]) 07:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


== Lead image ==
'''Copied from User_talk:KingoOfRay'''
:::] John Andrew Morrow is actually a strong advocate of Fard being foreign.
:::The census report, which can be found here:
:::https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/GCH7-ZKY/wallace-fard-1868
:::And the mentioning in this subreddit:
:::https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/rpzcm7/wallace_farq_mohammed_the_founder_of_the_nation/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
:::Are the only sources I can find by a quick Google research.
:::I don't want to watch the whole work by "Resume Byron" again. But I think that he had more quotes than that. Else, I wouldn't made my post. ] (]) 07:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
::@Doug Weller I just want this hypothesis getting unnoticed. Even if it doesn't find it's way into the article. Because neither AK Arian or Morrow or any other researcher/source mentioned this possibility. At least this way, maybe some people are going to dig into it. Besides "Resume Byron" of course. Who doesn't reach many people with his small YouTube channel. I think it's an very, very interesting discovery. Together with the last part of the similarities between him and a fellow prisoner called Lucius Lemus/Leemon (?,I don't quite understand the the surname). A man Fard took as his model, even taking up his birthday as the official birthday proclaimed by the NOI. They said he was born in 1877 at the 26th of February. Just like his fellow prisoner Lucius L. He also took other claims made by L. including how many languages he spoke and could write and were he studied. Things Fard and the NOI later adopted.
::"Resume Byron" is not a professional scholar, historian or journalist. But I had many conversations with him and he's an autodidact with great knowledge in the field of NOI studies. His own research is limited by his financial abilities. But I consider him better educated in many ways than Morrow. Who of course is an expert and professional in Islamic studies. I also personally think that Morrow didn't have much to add in his book, than AK Arian in "Chameleon" or Karl Evazz in "The Messenger", besides leading one through a jungle of different denominations/practices of Islam. ] (]) 09:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


The arguments for replacing the mugshot with the unfree image are “never been confirmed to be him” and “considered offensive”. “Offensive” isn’t a valid reason per ] so that leaves “never confirmed to be him” which is presented without evidence. Plus another apparently public domain image (]) exists so if it’s really an issue we can just crop that one. ] (]) 23:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
:Yeah, we can't really cite an autodidact on Youtube, but we also won't need to. Byron isn't the first person to suggest that Fard might have been what we'd now call a white-passing African-American. Sounds like I need to get a copy of Chameleon and The Messenger and work from those, rather than Morrow.
:It would violate NPOV to lead the article with an obscure mugshot to represent the founder of a religion which uses a historic photo for veneration. Additionally, we need the NoI official portrait so readers can do facial comparisons themselves between the NoI founder and the various photographs of people purported to be Fard. NOTCENSORED doesn't enter into it -- the mug shots are all still in the article. ] (]) 00:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
:Based on your understanding of those three sources, is it controversial to say that the NoI found ''was''' the man arrested in 1926 and sent to San Quentin? I think all mainstream schoalrly sources agree he was the same person, while NoI as a matter of faith teaches that he was not? IS that correct
Thank yuo so much for helping me get up to speed -- we're ''supposed'' to have an article that will get me up to speed, we shall have to write it ourselves. ] (]) 21:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC) ::You failed to explain why either image supposedly isn’t him. Also NPOV doesn’t apply at all to what is essentially a copyright problem, unless you’re specifically arguing for a more flattering portrait for its own sake (which would be NPOV on your part) ] (]) 16:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
:::{{tq|You failed to explain why either image supposedly isn’t him.}} Well that's because I tend to think all the images likely ''are'' of the same subject -- but that's a controversial statement, even amongst historians. NoI members have historically rejected as a matter of faith that the other images are of Fard.
:::{{tq|unless you’re specifically arguing for a more flattering portrait for its own sake}}
:::Not 'flattering', per se -- but a historic image of the subject in his role as religious leader is a more informative and higher-quality depiction than a mere mug shot or newspaper clipping. Mug shots are rarely used as primary image for individuals who have notability outside of crimes. ] (]) 23:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
::::The latter isn’t an excuse to violate fair use rules and quite frankly I don’t care what the NoI thinks because they also think white people are evil devils created by a mad scientist. ] (]) 00:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
:::::The official portrait is completely valid under our fair use rules. {{tq|I don’t care what the NoI thinks because they also think white people are evil devils created by a mad scientist.}}
:::::You're free not to care, but NPOV requires us to lead with a representative image of the subject as he is typically shown -- that's the NoI portrait. The lead image of ] is caligraphy, since that's how he's typically depicted. ]'s lead image is his historic portrait, not the recently-discovered photograph of him. ] (]) 01:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
::::Regrettably to some, but police mug shots and newspaper photo clippings are the only true photographs of the NOI founder. According to Elijah Muhammad's son, Wallace (Warithuddin) Mohammed, the official NOI portrait of the NOI founder was a "cosmetic or doctored" photo of Wallace Fard. Elijah Muhammad's son said the NOI founder used a perming application to straighten his curly wavy-like hair before sitting for the portrait that became the official NOI portrait of Wallace Fard. This description of Fard with curly hair is in line with every mug shot of the criminal Wallace Ford of California who is actually Wallace Fard. Elijah's son added that his father, Elijah Muhammad had many other pictures of the NOI founder which he did not allow members to see. RESUME BYRON ] (]) 04:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
:In principle this was an inappropriate NFCC photo, since there were free alternatives. For the same reason that if there are free images of someone as a child, you cannot use any non free photo of them under our NFCC rules, even if the image of them as a child is not representative. It is weird but how this goes.
:I agree that using the mugshot for the lead photo would be problematic since he's not an exclusively criminal figure, but the closeup image would have been better - though I suppose that could also be deemed problematic since it was involved in a police investigation but that isn't immediately evident by looking at it. If all of the free alternatives are problematic the alternative would be no image.
:However, the image was free anyway, because 1930s sects and newspapers weren't very good at adhering to the letter of copyright law. So problem solved. ] (]) 09:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)


== He was 100% a black supremacist ==
== NPOV issues: Black supremacist and avowed racist. ==


He was a member of the moorish science temple of america, a black supremacist cult, before he left and founded the nation of islam, another black supremacist cult, he taught that black people were the original humans on earth until a scientist named Yakub created "white devils" using eugenics, he was a black supremacist, Elijah Muhammad said multiple times Wallace taught him the Yakub story. ] (]) 16:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
This man is one of the most notable black supremacists, and one of the most notable racists in history. For every other supremacist, or racist, this is in the lede of the article. If by any stretch of the imagination he played coy with his ideologies or beliefs one could possibly stretch empathy to encompass - nah, I'm joking. You guys label anyone even the least racist person a racist if it suits your agenda. Yet a literal avowed racist who ranted extensively about genociding whites gets 'founder of the nation of islam.' and nothing more.
:Do you have any sources that support any of this? ] (]) 17:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
::"MUH SOURCES"
::lmao, pathetic, any simple google search will tell you pretty much the same things as i said, even the article on him mentions this, go back to reddit ] (]) 11:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
:Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Sorry to revert your changes, but I can't source them yet. (And I _have_ tried). Elijah Muhammad absolutely said W.D. Fard was a black supremacist -- but we don't know Elijah was telling the truth. Other of Fards followers said he used "Devils" to refer to ANY non-believer, not just whites. The recent breakthrough connecting Fard to Rutherford further strengthens the already-strong hypothesis that Fard's "devils" were different than Elijah Muhammad's "white devils". A further complication is that the term "black supremacist" is totally anachronistic to Fard's era, it's a phrasing from the 1960s.
:To establish Fard as a black supremacist, we need a published source from BEFORE he left Detroit, ideally from a critic, accusing him of preaching something akin to what we modernly understand as black supremacy. I honestly don't doubt that datum exists, but damned if I or any scholar has found it yet. And if I can't source it, people like Slatersteven will absolutely remove it if I were to try to add it (as well they should!!!) ] (]) 17:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
::I'm pretty sure that saying "black people are the original humans on earth until an evil scientist created white people using eugenics" 100% qualifies as black supremacy, even if the term didn't existed yet, just because the phrase didn't existed at the time doesn't mean the ideas didn't, black supremacy wasn't invented in the 1960's the TERM was coined in the 60's to refer to people that believed black people to be superior to white people. ] (]) 11:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
:::I agree, there's lots of good reasons to suspect Fard _did_ teach something akin to "non-white supremacy" -- but I don't get to use my own opinions. Suppose someone says Fard never actually taught that part of the Yacub story -- that white people were inherently diabolical? Maybe that interpretation was Elijah's?
:::Note that even after the "voodoo murder", the Detroit police never accuse him of being "anti-white" -- and they WERE looking hard at him. There's also the sort of inherent cognitive dissonance of palefaced man preaching white folks are ALL devils. We have at least one firsthand witness insists Fard taught black people were devils ''too''. ] (]) 14:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
::::"here's also the sort of inherent cognitive dissonance of palefaced man preaching white folks are ALL devils"
::::i mean as you said, cognitive disonance, there's lot of self-hating whites that have white guilt, also maybe he didnt actually believed any of the junk he preached and only did that for the money. ] (]) 17:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
:::::I agree, and I strongly suspect we will find that Fard ''did'' preach non-white superiority. Whatever his skin color, he did time in a colored prison and thus certainly would have felt he was a black man in the eyes of America. But damn if I can prove it yet. Keep looking -- we really just need one good new article from before disappears where he talks about Yakub or white devils and we'd have it. ] (]) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
::::::The story of Yakub first originated on the writings of Wallace Fard Muhammad, the founder of the Nation of Islam, in his doctrinal Q&A pamphlet Lost Found Moslem Lesson No. 2 from the early 1930s. ] (]) 17:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
:besides, on wallace being a former member of the moorish science temple of america(from the same article):
:Potential link to Moorish Science Temple of America
:
:In addition to his assertion that Fard was Ford, Evanzz also said that Fard was once a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America, citing as a primary source the 1945 publication by Arna Bontemps and Jack Conroy titled They Seek A City. Authors have also cited E. U. Essien-Udom for this proposition as well. In his 1962 book Black Nationalism: The Search for an Identity, Essien-Udom wrote:
:Noble Drew Ali was shot and stabbed in his offices at the Unity Club in Chicago on the night of March 15, 1929. … He was eventually released on bond, but a few weeks later, he died under mysterious circumstances. Some people claim that he died from injuries inflicted by the police while he was in jail. Others, however, suggest that he was killed by Greene's partisans. For some time, one W. D. Fard assumed leadership of the Moorish movement. According to Bontemps and Conroy, Fard claimed that he was the reincarnation of Noble Drew Ali. By 1930 a permanent split developed in the movement. One faction, the Moors, remains faithful to Noble Drew Ali, and the other, which is now led by Elijah Muhammad, remains faithful to Prophet Fard (Master Wallace Fard Muhammad). However, Minister Malcolm X and other leaders of the Nation of Islam have emphatically denied any past connection whatsoever of Elijah Muhammad, Master Wallace Fard Muhammad, or their movement with Nobel Drew Ali's Moorish American Science Temple.
:On the question of a connection between the Nation of Islam and the Moorish Science Temple of America, Beynon wrote:
:Awakened already to a consciousness of race discrimination, these migrants from the South came into contact with militant movements among northern Negroes. Practically none of them had been in the North prior to the collapse of the Marcus Garvey movement. A few of them had come under the influence of the Moorish-American cult which succeeded it. The effect of both these movements upon the future members of the Nation of Islam was largely indirect. Garvey taught the Negroes that their homeland was Ethiopia. The Noble Drew Ali, the prophet of the Moorish-Americans, proclaimed that these people were 'descendants of Morrocans '.
:Beynon further wrote: "The prophet's message was characterized by his ability to utilize to the fullest measure the environment of his followers. Their physical and economic difficulties alike were used to illustrate the new teaching. Similarly, biblical prophecies and the teachings of Marcus Garvey and Noble Drew Ali were cited as foretelling the coming of the new prophet." Bowen rejects claims that Fard was a member of the MSTA as unsubstantiated. ] (]) 11:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
::""MUH SOURCES"" sorry but read ] nothing can be added to an article unless it is cited to RS. ] (]) 15:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
:::lmao, i already gave you sources showing he was probably a member of the moorish science temple of america, also the sources wikipedia considers as "reliable" are a joke, they can go to actual reliable sources to garbage like the ADL, also primary sources>>>secondary sources, but not according to this website i guess... ] (]) 17:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
::::So they call him a white supremacist, or is that your interpretation? ] (]) 10:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
:::::what are you even talking about? nowhere in the primary historical sources and police records of the time call him a white supremacist, in fact, if you look at what he taught about Yakub as well as pretty much everything about the NOI, you will see he was the exact opposite of white supremacist, even if the term black supremacist did not exist until the 60's, he still taught some form of non-white supremacy. ] (]) 17:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)


== Voodoo murder ==
I want to assume good faith here, but you'd have to have a crayon shoved deep up each nostril to NOT see the blatant POV issue with this article. ] (]) 22:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
:I'm still learning about Fard, but I'm not sure he was a Black Supremacist or if that was more a teaching of his successors. Fard was, at minimum, white-passing. ] (]) 23:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
==ToDo / Thoughts ==
* Per ResumeByron: WDF sold hair relaxer. Important if true given the prominence of the product in Autobio of Malc X.
* Claim that WDF personally used relaxer cited to Elijah Muhammad's son.
* good overview:
** Arrested after infamous ''voodoo'' murder
** Order to disband the cult as condition of release?
** Re-arrested in Detroit
** Threatened with accessory to murder if returns to Detroit
** Maintained correspondence with Elijah Muhammad
] (]) 00:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


I feel this part is abruptly introduced and then isn't covered in great detail - not that it needs to be in a biography of Fard, but as a controversy so tied to the NoI I would think it would be covered in greater detail somewhere! The NoI article just says the killer was declared insane and gives no detail. Is the murder itself notable, you think? Or is this just not mentioned in great detail in more sources? If it's all there is that's how it is but I find the details given here fascinating. ] (]) 09:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:I think you'll need better sources than Morrow for any of this. ] ] 07:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
::So, catch me up -- I know it would be controversial to say, as fact, that the subject of this article was born in Texas, that's just one of many many theories. Is it controversial in your eyes to say that Wallace Fard Muhammad was W.D. Fard who was arrested in 1926, 1932 and 1933? ] (]) 09:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
:::I really need to get out of this discussion, it's distracting me from other priorities. We'd need multiple solid sources for that. ] ] 13:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


:Oh yes, I meant to get back to writing that up. I'll start on it. Thanks for the request! ] (]) 09:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
== Pictures ==


== Structuring ==
At the paragraph "Efforts to trace Fard's history 1914–1926", it says that there are only five known pictures of Fard. This is wrong!


The content in this article is quite good but I think it is organized in a strange manner, different from any biography article I have seen. I think the content on his origins are encyclopedic and shouldn't be trimmed but the way we are currently presenting it strikes me as unsatisfactory.
There are two pictures from the "Detroit Free Press" (edition November 24, 1932) that show him, wearing a scarf and presenting a book to two police officers. After he was being arrested, because of a murder case that involved one of his followers/cult member. ] (]) 10:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


We could split it into an article called maybe, ], and then have a summary of that on this article as an "Early life" type thing. I think the speculations on his later life can stay here. There are other things we can do. As is though this feels very... odd. ] (]) 21:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Fixed! This article needs a lot of work. I've changed it to a handful. These are the pictures we have on Misplaced Pages of Fard:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*The official NoI portrait ] (not displayed because its still under copyright)
At some point, all these images should find their way into this article, but we don't really have the narrative to accompany them written yet.


:Yeah, I've meant to fork this off to a sub-article. Doing that now. ] (]) 00:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
We also need images of the various government documents tied to Fard -- Census record, Marriage records, birth certificates, etc. We probably won't show them in-article, but we should have them available for our readers to inspect. If you know where we could find them, please let me know.
] (]) 21:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC) :Thank you for all the requests/suggestions you've made. Writing in a vacuum is hard, very helpful to have an 'editor' who can help guide you. Thanks! ] (]) 11:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
::Yeah I feel that haha.
::In any case, the article is now much better. Far clearer, good job. ] (]) 01:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:01, 27 December 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wallace Fard Muhammad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconMichigan Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIllinois Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAfrican diaspora Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligion: New religious movements / Religious leaders Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Religious leaders work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Efforts to trace Fard's history

This article tries to create a mystery around his "disappearance". He was simply deported, or fled America to Fiji to avoid prosecution (he was also being investigated for being a spy and helping the Japanese) around 1934, then returned as "Muhammad Abdullah".

Sources: Finding W.D. Fard: Unveiling the Identity of the Founder of the Nation of Islam By John Andrew Morrow link

^Escanaba Daily Press (November 24, 1932) on the murder committed by Robert Harris. It says that Wallace Fard "is awaiting an immigration hearing. Officials said he came to the United States from Asia." link.

^His two findagrave.com profiles link, link

From his findagrave.com profile: "What is certain, is that he was in Fiji from 1934 until roughly 1959"

^Warith Deen Muhammad claimed that Fard had returned to the United States under the name Muhammad Abdullah. In 1976, W.D. had appointed Muhammad Abdullah as imam of Muhammad's Mosque #77 in Oakland, California. The November 26, 1976, issue of the NOI journal Bilalian News reports Muhammad Abdullah's first khutbah at the mosque and shows a photo. W.D. Mohammad did not state that Muhammad Abdullah was Fard until after Abdullah's death in 1992.

Here he is with Louis Farrakhan and Jim Jones in 1976:

https://calisphere.org/item/7c7690dd7f54dc713239e1a824301a26/ (source album: https://calisphere.org/collections/27519)

Video of him using the name Muhammad Abdullah in 1977:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cgu33pkLsis&feature=emb_title (original source: https://diva.sfsu.edu/collections/sfbatv/bundles/229337)

Video of him using the name Muhammad Abdullah in 1989:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ0lnqQPybM

Excessive detail in Efforts to trace Fard's origin and fate section

It seems to me that there is an excessive amount of detail about the lives of people who have been speculated to be Fard. For example, I don't see how it is relevant to the article or useful to the reader to know about the vacation which Fred Dodd took. In addition, there is nothing in the article explaining a link between Fred Walldad and Fard, and I can't find anything online.

I'm not an expert and I don't want to unilaterally remove information, but it seems to me that this section could use some cleaning up. Other input would be appreciated. LemonOrangeLime (talk) 14:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

I actually anticipated this concern. Whole books have been written about Fard's origins, and our readers should be able to learn about the contents of those books -- but on the other hand, even if Fard really was a Tamale vendor in Oregon earlier in life, what does it matter to his legacy?
I didn't know if anyone would have this concern but myself, but now that you have shared it, my proposal would be to split off this content in to a subarticle about Fard's origins, so that the casual reader of the biography doesn't have to get mired down in details that the historians document. Does that plan sound good to you? Feoffer (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
A year late to the party but what happened to this guy and where he's from does not seem undue weight to me, as so many works seem to exclusively focus on it. Honestly it's probably enough to sustain its own article on a purely GNG basis, though I'm not sure if that's the best way to organize it strictly. Could be. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Lead image

The arguments for replacing the mugshot with the unfree image are “never been confirmed to be him” and “considered offensive”. “Offensive” isn’t a valid reason per WP:NOTCENSORED so that leaves “never confirmed to be him” which is presented without evidence. Plus another apparently public domain image (file:WDFardcloseup.jpg) exists so if it’s really an issue we can just crop that one. Dronebogus (talk) 23:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

It would violate NPOV to lead the article with an obscure mugshot to represent the founder of a religion which uses a historic photo for veneration. Additionally, we need the NoI official portrait so readers can do facial comparisons themselves between the NoI founder and the various photographs of people purported to be Fard. NOTCENSORED doesn't enter into it -- the mug shots are all still in the article. Feoffer (talk) 00:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
You failed to explain why either image supposedly isn’t him. Also NPOV doesn’t apply at all to what is essentially a copyright problem, unless you’re specifically arguing for a more flattering portrait for its own sake (which would be NPOV on your part) Dronebogus (talk) 16:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
You failed to explain why either image supposedly isn’t him. Well that's because I tend to think all the images likely are of the same subject -- but that's a controversial statement, even amongst historians. NoI members have historically rejected as a matter of faith that the other images are of Fard.
unless you’re specifically arguing for a more flattering portrait for its own sake
Not 'flattering', per se -- but a historic image of the subject in his role as religious leader is a more informative and higher-quality depiction than a mere mug shot or newspaper clipping. Mug shots are rarely used as primary image for individuals who have notability outside of crimes. Feoffer (talk) 23:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
The latter isn’t an excuse to violate fair use rules and quite frankly I don’t care what the NoI thinks because they also think white people are evil devils created by a mad scientist. Dronebogus (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
The official portrait is completely valid under our fair use rules. I don’t care what the NoI thinks because they also think white people are evil devils created by a mad scientist.
You're free not to care, but NPOV requires us to lead with a representative image of the subject as he is typically shown -- that's the NoI portrait. The lead image of Muhammad is caligraphy, since that's how he's typically depicted. Joseph Smith's lead image is his historic portrait, not the recently-discovered photograph of him. Feoffer (talk) 01:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Regrettably to some, but police mug shots and newspaper photo clippings are the only true photographs of the NOI founder. According to Elijah Muhammad's son, Wallace (Warithuddin) Mohammed, the official NOI portrait of the NOI founder was a "cosmetic or doctored" photo of Wallace Fard. Elijah Muhammad's son said the NOI founder used a perming application to straighten his curly wavy-like hair before sitting for the portrait that became the official NOI portrait of Wallace Fard. This description of Fard with curly hair is in line with every mug shot of the criminal Wallace Ford of California who is actually Wallace Fard. Elijah's son added that his father, Elijah Muhammad had many other pictures of the NOI founder which he did not allow members to see. RESUME BYRON 2600:1700:72EA:E880:CD2C:202:B1BD:3FB6 (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
In principle this was an inappropriate NFCC photo, since there were free alternatives. For the same reason that if there are free images of someone as a child, you cannot use any non free photo of them under our NFCC rules, even if the image of them as a child is not representative. It is weird but how this goes.
I agree that using the mugshot for the lead photo would be problematic since he's not an exclusively criminal figure, but the closeup image would have been better - though I suppose that could also be deemed problematic since it was involved in a police investigation but that isn't immediately evident by looking at it. If all of the free alternatives are problematic the alternative would be no image.
However, the image was free anyway, because 1930s sects and newspapers weren't very good at adhering to the letter of copyright law. So problem solved. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

He was 100% a black supremacist

He was a member of the moorish science temple of america, a black supremacist cult, before he left and founded the nation of islam, another black supremacist cult, he taught that black people were the original humans on earth until a scientist named Yakub created "white devils" using eugenics, he was a black supremacist, Elijah Muhammad said multiple times Wallace taught him the Yakub story. 2804:6A00:F014:8700:E9CD:1795:346B:1EC3 (talk) 16:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Do you have any sources that support any of this? Slatersteven (talk) 17:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
"MUH SOURCES"
lmao, pathetic, any simple google search will tell you pretty much the same things as i said, even the article on him mentions this, go back to reddit 2804:6A00:F014:8700:6D26:51B5:5C43:147F (talk) 11:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Sorry to revert your changes, but I can't source them yet. (And I _have_ tried). Elijah Muhammad absolutely said W.D. Fard was a black supremacist -- but we don't know Elijah was telling the truth. Other of Fards followers said he used "Devils" to refer to ANY non-believer, not just whites. The recent breakthrough connecting Fard to Rutherford further strengthens the already-strong hypothesis that Fard's "devils" were different than Elijah Muhammad's "white devils". A further complication is that the term "black supremacist" is totally anachronistic to Fard's era, it's a phrasing from the 1960s.
To establish Fard as a black supremacist, we need a published source from BEFORE he left Detroit, ideally from a critic, accusing him of preaching something akin to what we modernly understand as black supremacy. I honestly don't doubt that datum exists, but damned if I or any scholar has found it yet. And if I can't source it, people like Slatersteven will absolutely remove it if I were to try to add it (as well they should!!!) Feoffer (talk) 17:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure that saying "black people are the original humans on earth until an evil scientist created white people using eugenics" 100% qualifies as black supremacy, even if the term didn't existed yet, just because the phrase didn't existed at the time doesn't mean the ideas didn't, black supremacy wasn't invented in the 1960's the TERM was coined in the 60's to refer to people that believed black people to be superior to white people. 2804:6A00:F014:8700:6D26:51B5:5C43:147F (talk) 11:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
I agree, there's lots of good reasons to suspect Fard _did_ teach something akin to "non-white supremacy" -- but I don't get to use my own opinions. Suppose someone says Fard never actually taught that part of the Yacub story -- that white people were inherently diabolical? Maybe that interpretation was Elijah's?
Note that even after the "voodoo murder", the Detroit police never accuse him of being "anti-white" -- and they WERE looking hard at him. There's also the sort of inherent cognitive dissonance of palefaced man preaching white folks are ALL devils. We have at least one firsthand witness insists Fard taught black people were devils too. Feoffer (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
"here's also the sort of inherent cognitive dissonance of palefaced man preaching white folks are ALL devils"
i mean as you said, cognitive disonance, there's lot of self-hating whites that have white guilt, also maybe he didnt actually believed any of the junk he preached and only did that for the money. 2804:6A00:F014:8700:6D26:51B5:5C43:147F (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
I agree, and I strongly suspect we will find that Fard did preach non-white superiority. Whatever his skin color, he did time in a colored prison and thus certainly would have felt he was a black man in the eyes of America. But damn if I can prove it yet. Keep looking -- we really just need one good new article from before disappears where he talks about Yakub or white devils and we'd have it. Feoffer (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
The story of Yakub first originated on the writings of Wallace Fard Muhammad, the founder of the Nation of Islam, in his doctrinal Q&A pamphlet Lost Found Moslem Lesson No. 2 from the early 1930s. 2804:29B8:509E:616D:301E:3AD9:462C:83BA (talk) 17:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
besides, on wallace being a former member of the moorish science temple of america(from the same article):
Potential link to Moorish Science Temple of America
In addition to his assertion that Fard was Ford, Evanzz also said that Fard was once a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America, citing as a primary source the 1945 publication by Arna Bontemps and Jack Conroy titled They Seek A City. Authors have also cited E. U. Essien-Udom for this proposition as well. In his 1962 book Black Nationalism: The Search for an Identity, Essien-Udom wrote:
Noble Drew Ali was shot and stabbed in his offices at the Unity Club in Chicago on the night of March 15, 1929. … He was eventually released on bond, but a few weeks later, he died under mysterious circumstances. Some people claim that he died from injuries inflicted by the police while he was in jail. Others, however, suggest that he was killed by Greene's partisans. For some time, one W. D. Fard assumed leadership of the Moorish movement. According to Bontemps and Conroy, Fard claimed that he was the reincarnation of Noble Drew Ali. By 1930 a permanent split developed in the movement. One faction, the Moors, remains faithful to Noble Drew Ali, and the other, which is now led by Elijah Muhammad, remains faithful to Prophet Fard (Master Wallace Fard Muhammad). However, Minister Malcolm X and other leaders of the Nation of Islam have emphatically denied any past connection whatsoever of Elijah Muhammad, Master Wallace Fard Muhammad, or their movement with Nobel Drew Ali's Moorish American Science Temple.
On the question of a connection between the Nation of Islam and the Moorish Science Temple of America, Beynon wrote:
Awakened already to a consciousness of race discrimination, these migrants from the South came into contact with militant movements among northern Negroes. Practically none of them had been in the North prior to the collapse of the Marcus Garvey movement. A few of them had come under the influence of the Moorish-American cult which succeeded it. The effect of both these movements upon the future members of the Nation of Islam was largely indirect. Garvey taught the Negroes that their homeland was Ethiopia. The Noble Drew Ali, the prophet of the Moorish-Americans, proclaimed that these people were 'descendants of Morrocans '.
Beynon further wrote: "The prophet's message was characterized by his ability to utilize to the fullest measure the environment of his followers. Their physical and economic difficulties alike were used to illustrate the new teaching. Similarly, biblical prophecies and the teachings of Marcus Garvey and Noble Drew Ali were cited as foretelling the coming of the new prophet." Bowen rejects claims that Fard was a member of the MSTA as unsubstantiated. 2804:6A00:F014:8700:6D26:51B5:5C43:147F (talk) 11:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
""MUH SOURCES"" sorry but read wp:policy nothing can be added to an article unless it is cited to RS. Slatersteven (talk) 15:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
lmao, i already gave you sources showing he was probably a member of the moorish science temple of america, also the sources wikipedia considers as "reliable" are a joke, they can go to actual reliable sources to garbage like the ADL, also primary sources>>>secondary sources, but not according to this website i guess... 2804:6A00:F014:8700:6D26:51B5:5C43:147F (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
So they call him a white supremacist, or is that your interpretation? Slatersteven (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
what are you even talking about? nowhere in the primary historical sources and police records of the time call him a white supremacist, in fact, if you look at what he taught about Yakub as well as pretty much everything about the NOI, you will see he was the exact opposite of white supremacist, even if the term black supremacist did not exist until the 60's, he still taught some form of non-white supremacy. 2804:29B8:509E:616D:301E:3AD9:462C:83BA (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Voodoo murder

I feel this part is abruptly introduced and then isn't covered in great detail - not that it needs to be in a biography of Fard, but as a controversy so tied to the NoI I would think it would be covered in greater detail somewhere! The NoI article just says the killer was declared insane and gives no detail. Is the murder itself notable, you think? Or is this just not mentioned in great detail in more sources? If it's all there is that's how it is but I find the details given here fascinating. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Oh yes, I meant to get back to writing that up. I'll start on it. Thanks for the request! Feoffer (talk) 09:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Structuring

The content in this article is quite good but I think it is organized in a strange manner, different from any biography article I have seen. I think the content on his origins are encyclopedic and shouldn't be trimmed but the way we are currently presenting it strikes me as unsatisfactory.

We could split it into an article called maybe, Origins of Wallace Fard Muhammad, and then have a summary of that on this article as an "Early life" type thing. I think the speculations on his later life can stay here. There are other things we can do. As is though this feels very... odd. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I've meant to fork this off to a sub-article. Doing that now. Feoffer (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for all the requests/suggestions you've made. Writing in a vacuum is hard, very helpful to have an 'editor' who can help guide you. Thanks! Feoffer (talk) 11:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Yeah I feel that haha.
In any case, the article is now much better. Far clearer, good job. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: