Misplaced Pages

Emperor of India: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:45, 2 August 2023 editDrKay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators159,648 edits failed verification: not found in sources cited | there's nothing in any of the three sources provided about why the title was given or what it signifiedTag: Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:19, 24 December 2024 edit undoMaurya-E-Mughal (talk | contribs)60 editsNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(61 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Title used by British monarchs from 1 May 1876 to 22 June 1948}} {{short description|Title used by British monarchs from 1876 to 1948}}
{{about|the official title "Emperor of India" which was used by British monarchs|the list of native Indian emperors|List of Indian monarchs|the British battleship|HMS Emperor of India}} {{about|an official title used by British monarchs|other emperors in the Indian subcontinent|List of Indian monarchs|the British battleship|HMS Emperor of India}}
{{Redirect|Empress of India}}
⚫ {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}}
{{Use British English|date=May 2019}} {{Use British English|date=May 2019}}

{{Not to be confused with|Emperor of Hindustan}}

⚫ {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2024}}
{{Infobox former monarchy {{Infobox former monarchy
| royal_title = Emperor | royal_title = Emperor
| native_name = ''Kaisar-i-Hind'' | native_name = ''Kaisar-i-Hind''
| coatofarms = Star-of-India-gold-centre.svg
⚫ | coatofarmscaption = The ]
| realm = India | realm = India
| border = imperial | border = imperial
| image = King George VI LOC matpc.14736 (cleaned).jpg
| coatofarms = {{box|type=transparent|]{{nbsp|3}}]}}
⚫ | image_size =
⚫ | coatofarmscaption = The ] and the ]
| image = King George VI LOC matpc.14736 (cleaned).jpg | alt =
⚫ | caption = '''Last to reign<br />]'''<br />11 December 1936 – 15 August 1947
⚫ | image_size =
| alt =
⚫ | caption = '''Last to Reign<br />]'''<br />11 December 1936 – 15 August 1947
| first_monarch = ] | first_monarch = ]
| last_monarch = ]<br />(continued as ] and ]) | last_monarch = ]<br />(continued as ] and ])
Line 20: Line 22:
| ended = 22 June 1948 | ended = 22 June 1948
}} }}
'''Emperor''' or '''Empress of India''' was a title used by ]s from 1 May 1876 (with the ]) to 22 June 1948.<ref name="gazette1948-06-22a">{{London Gazette |issue=38330 |date=22 June 1948 |page=3647}} Royal Proclamation of 22 June 1948, made in accordance with the ('Section 7: ...(2)The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the words " Indiae Imperator " and the words " Emperor of India " and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm.'). According to this Royal Proclamation, the King retained the ] 'George VI by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas King, Defender of the Faith'</ref><ref name="Act1947">'']'' (10 & 11 Geo. 6. c. 30)</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=David Kenneth Fieldhouse |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nZHdAZDr-kYC&pg=PA37 |title=Select Documents on the Constitutional History of the British Empire and Commonwealth: Settler self-government, 1840–1900 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=1985 |isbn=978-0-313-27326-1 |page=37}}</ref> The image of the emperor or empress appeared on currency, in government buildings, railway stations, courts, on statues etc. Oaths of allegiance were made to the emperor or empress and the lawful successors by the ], ], governors, ] in India in events such as ]s. '''Emperor''' or '''Empress of India''' was a title used by ]s from 1 May 1876 (with the ]) to 22 June 1948<ref name="gazette1948-06-22a">{{London Gazette |issue=38330 |date=22 June 1948 |page=3647}} Royal Proclamation of 22 June 1948, made in accordance with the ('Section 7: ...(2)The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the words " Indiae Imperator " and the words " Emperor of India " and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm.'). According to this Royal Proclamation, the King retained the ] 'George VI by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas King, Defender of the Faith'</ref><ref name="Act1947">'']'' (10 & 11 Geo. 6. c. 30)</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=David Kenneth Fieldhouse |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nZHdAZDr-kYC&pg=PA37 |title=Select Documents on the Constitutional History of the British Empire and Commonwealth: Settler self-government, 1840–1900 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=1985 |isbn=978-0-313-27326-1 |page=37}}</ref> to signify their sovereignty over the ] as its imperial ]. The image of the emperor or empress appeared on ], in government buildings, railway stations, courts, on statues etc. Oaths of allegiance were made to the emperor or empress and the lawful successors by the ], ], governors, ] in India in events such as ]s.


The title was abolished on 22 June 1948, with the ], under which ] made a ] that the words "Emperor of India" were to be omitted in ] and from ]s. This was almost a year after he became the ] of the newly ] and independent dominions of ] and ] in 1947. These were abolished upon the establishment of the ] in 1950 and the ] in 1956. The title was abolished on 22 June 1948, with the ], under which ] made a ] that the words "Emperor of India" were to be omitted in ] and from ]s. This was almost a year after he became the ] of the newly ] and independent dominions of ] and ] in 1947. These were abolished upon the establishment of the ] in 1950 and the ] in 1956.


==History== ==History==
{{See also|Style of the British sovereign}} {{See also|Style of the British sovereign}}
] where lamps are exchanged. The prime minister, Benjamin Disraeli, is offering Queen Victoria an imperial crown in exchange for an earl's coronet. She made him ] at this time.<ref>{{cite book|author=Harold E. Raugh|title=The Victorians at War, 1815–1914: An Encyclopedia of British Military History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HvE_Pa_ZlfsC&pg=PA122|year=2004|publisher=ABC-CLIO|page=122|isbn=9781576079256}}</ref>]] ] where lamps are exchanged. She made him ] at this time.<ref>{{cite book |author=Harold E. Raugh |title=The Victorians at War, 1815–1914: An Encyclopedia of British Military History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HvE_Pa_ZlfsC&pg=PA122 |year=2004 |publisher=] |page=122 |isbn=9781576079256 }}</ref>]]


After the nominal ] ] was deposed at the conclusion of the ] (10 May 1857 – 1 November 1858), the government of the ] decided to transfer control of ] and the ]s from the mercantile ] (EIC) to ], thus marking the beginning of the ]. The EIC was officially dissolved on 1 June 1874, and the ], ], decided to offer ] the title "Empress of India" shortly afterwards. Victoria accepted this style on 1 May 1876. The first ] (which served as an imperial coronation) was held in her honour eight months later on 1 January 1877.<ref>L. A. Knight, "The Royal Titles Act and India", ''The Historical Journal'', Cambridge University Press, Vol. 11, No. 3 (1968), pp. 488–489.</ref> After the nominal ] ] was deposed at the conclusion of the ] (10 May 1857 – 1 November 1858), the government of the ] decided to transfer control of ] and the ]s from the mercantile ] (EIC) to ], thus marking the beginning of the ]. The EIC ], and the ], ], decided to offer ] the title "Empress of India" shortly afterwards. Victoria accepted this style on 1 May 1876. The first ] (which served as an imperial coronation) was held in her honour eight months later on 1 January 1877.<ref>L. A. Knight, "The Royal Titles Act and India", ''The Historical Journal'', Cambridge University Press, Vol. 11, No. 3 (1968), pp. 488–489.</ref>


]]] ]]]
The idea of having Queen Victoria proclaimed empress of India was not particularly new, as ] had already suggested it in 1843 upon becoming the ]. By 1874, ] ], the Queen's private secretary, had ordered English charters to be scrutinised for imperial titles, with ] and ] mentioned as sound precedents. The Queen, possibly irritated by the sallies of the republicans, the tendency to democracy, and the realisation that her influence was manifestly on the decline, was urging the move.<ref name="Knight 489">L. A. Knight, p. 489.</ref> Another factor may have been that the Queen's first child, ], was married to ], the heir apparent to the ]. Upon becoming empress, she would outrank her mother.<ref>{{cite web |title=Remembering Vicky, the Queen Britain never had |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/ideas/2013/07/remembering-vicky-queen-britain-never-had |website=www.newstatesman.com|date=10 June 2021 }}</ref> By January 1876, the Queen's insistence was so great that Benjamin Disraeli felt that he could procrastinate no longer.<ref name="Knight 489" /> Initially, Victoria had considered the style "Empress of Great Britain, Ireland, and India", but Disraeli had persuaded the Queen to limit the title to India in order to avoid controversy.<ref>L. A. Knight, p. 488.</ref> Hence, the title ''Kaisar-i-Hind'' was coined in 1876 by the orientalist ] as the official imperial title for the British monarch in India.<ref>B.S. Cohn, "Representing Authority in Victorian India", in E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger (eds.), ''The Invention of Tradition'' (1983), 165–209, esp. 201-2.</ref> The term ''Kaisar-i-Hind'' means emperor of India in the vernacular of the Hindi and Urdu languages. The word ''kaisar'', meaning 'emperor', is a derivative of the Roman imperial title ] (via Persian, Turkish – see '']''), and is cognate with the German title '']'', which was borrowed from the Latin at an earlier date.<ref>See ], "Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts", p. 29, 12.1 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130523094912/http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0703/ejvs0703article.pdf|date=23 May 2013}}</ref> The idea of having Queen Victoria proclaimed empress of India was not particularly new, as ] had already suggested it in 1843 upon becoming the ]. By 1874, ] ], the Queen's private secretary, had ordered English charters to be scrutinised for imperial titles, with ] and ] mentioned as sound precedents. The Queen, possibly irritated by the sallies of the republicans, the tendency to democracy, and the realisation that her influence was manifestly on the decline, was urging the move.<ref name="Knight 489">L. A. Knight, p. 489.</ref> Another factor may have been that the Queen's first child, ], was married to ], the heir apparent to the ]. Upon becoming empress, she would outrank her mother.<ref>{{cite web |title=Remembering Vicky, the Queen Britain never had |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/ideas/2013/07/remembering-vicky-queen-britain-never-had |work=] |date=10 June 2021 }}</ref> By January 1876, the Queen's insistence was so great that Benjamin Disraeli felt that he could procrastinate no longer.<ref name="Knight 489" /> Initially, Victoria had considered the style "Empress of Great Britain, Ireland, and India", but Disraeli had persuaded the Queen to limit the title to India in order to avoid controversy.<ref>L. A. Knight, p. 488.</ref> Hence, the title ''Kaisar-i-Hind'' was coined in 1876 by the orientalist ] as the official imperial title for the British monarch in India.<ref>B.S. Cohn, "Representing Authority in Victorian India", in E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger (eds.), ''The Invention of Tradition'' (1983), 165–209, esp. 201-2.</ref> The term ''Kaisar-i-Hind'' means emperor of India in the vernacular of the Hindi and Urdu languages. The word ''kaisar'', meaning 'emperor', is a derivative of the Roman imperial title {{lang|it|]}} (via ] and ] – see {{lang|ota-Latn|]}}), and is cognate with the German title {{lang|de|]}}, which was borrowed from the Latin at an earlier date.<ref>See ], "Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts", p. 29, 12.1 {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130523094912/http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs0703/ejvs0703article.pdf|date=23 May 2013}}</ref>


Many in the United Kingdom, however, regarded the assumption of the title as an obvious development from the ], which resulted in the founding of British India, ruled directly by ]. The public were of the opinion that the title of "queen" was no longer adequate for the ceremonial ruler of what was often referred to informally as the "Indian Empire." The new styling underlined the fact that the native states were no longer a mere agglomeration but a collective entity.<ref>L. A. Knight, pp. 491, 496</ref> Many in the United Kingdom, however, regarded the assumption of the title as an obvious development from the ], which resulted in the founding of British India, ruled directly by ]. The public were of the opinion that the title of "queen" was no longer adequate for the ceremonial ruler of what was often referred to informally as the "Indian Empire". The new styling underlined the fact that the native states were no longer a mere agglomeration but a collective entity.<ref>L. A. Knight, pp. 491, 496</ref>


] ]
] ]
When ] ascended to the throne on 22 January 1901, he continued the imperial tradition laid down by his mother, Queen Victoria, by adopting the title Emperor of India. Three subsequent British monarchs followed in his footsteps, and the title continued to be used after India and Pakistan had become independent on 15 August 1947. It was not until 22 June 1948 that the style was officially abolished during the reign of ].<ref name="Act1947" /> When ] ascended to the throne on 22 January 1901, he continued the imperial tradition laid down by his mother, Queen Victoria, by adopting the title Emperor of India. Three subsequent British monarchs followed in his footsteps, and the title continued to be used after India and Pakistan had become independent on 15 August 1947. It was not until 22 June 1948 that the style was officially abolished during the reign of ].<ref name="Act1947" />


The first emperor to visit India was ]. For his imperial coronation ceremony at the ], the ] was created. The Crown weighs {{convert|920|g|lb|abbr=on}} and is set with 6,170 diamonds, 9 emeralds, 4 rubies, and 4 sapphires. At the front is a very fine emerald weighing {{convert|32|carat|g}}.<ref>{{cite book |author=Edward Francis Twining |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XvIOAQAAMAAJ |title=A History of the Crown Jewels of Europe |publisher=B. T. Batsford |year=1960 |page=169 |asin=B00283LZA6 |author-link=Edward_Twining}}</ref> The king wrote in his diary that it was heavy and uncomfortable to wear: "Rather tired after wearing my crown for {{frac|3|1|2}} hours; it hurt my head, as it is pretty heavy."<ref>{{cite book |last=Brooman |first=Josh |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JyWgAAAAMAAJ |title=The World Since 1900 |publisher=Longman |year=1989 |isbn=0-5820-0989-8 |edition=3rd |page=96}}</ref> The first emperor to visit India was ]. For his imperial coronation ceremony at the ], the ] was created. The Crown weighs {{convert|920|g|lb|abbr=on}} and is set with 6,170 diamonds, 9 emeralds, 4 rubies, and 4 sapphires. At the front is a very fine emerald weighing {{convert|32|carat|g}}.<ref>{{cite book |author=Edward Francis Twining |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XvIOAQAAMAAJ |title=A History of the Crown Jewels of Europe |publisher=B. T. Batsford |year=1960 |page=169 |asin=B00283LZA6 |author-link=Edward Twining}}</ref> The king wrote in his diary that it was heavy and uncomfortable to wear: "Rather tired after wearing my crown for {{frac|3|1|2}} hours; it hurt my head, as it is pretty heavy."<ref>{{cite book |last=Brooman |first=Josh |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JyWgAAAAMAAJ |title=The World Since 1900 |publisher=Longman |year=1989 |isbn=0-5820-0989-8 |edition=3rd |page=96}}</ref>


The title "Emperor of India" did not disappear when British India became the ] (1947–1950) and ] (1947–1952) after independence in 1947. George VI retained the title until 22 June 1948, the date of a Royal Proclamation<ref name="RP">{{London Gazette |issue=38330 |date=22 June 1948 |page=3647}}</ref> made in accordance with Section 7 (2) of the ], reading: "The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the words "Indiae Imperator" and the words "Emperor of India" and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm."<ref>, Section 7 (2)</ref> Thereafter, George VI remained monarch of Pakistan until his death in 1952 and of India until it became the ] in 1950. The title "Emperor of India" did not disappear when British India became the ] (1947–1950) and ] (1947–1952) after independence in 1947. George VI retained the title until 22 June 1948, the date of a Royal Proclamation<ref name="RP">{{London Gazette |issue=38330 |date=22 June 1948 |page=3647}}</ref> made in accordance with Section 7 (2) of the ], reading: "The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the words {{lang|la|Indiae Imperator}} and the words "Emperor of India" and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm."<ref>, Section 7 (2)</ref> Thereafter, George VI remained monarch of Pakistan until his death in 1952 and of India until it became the ] in 1950.


], as well as those of the ] and the ], had routinely included the abbreviated title ''Ind. Imp.'' Coins in India, on the other hand, had the word "empress", and later "king-emperor" in English. The title appeared on coinage in the United Kingdom throughout 1948, with a further Royal Proclamation made on 22 December under the ] to omit the abbreviated title.<ref>{{London Gazette|issue=38487|date=24 December 1948|page=6665}}</ref> ], as well as those of the ] and the ], had routinely included the abbreviated title {{lang|la|Ind. Imp}}. Coins in India, on the other hand, had the word ''empress'', and later ''king-emperor'' in English. The title appeared on coinage in the United Kingdom throughout 1948, with a further Royal Proclamation made on 22 December under the ] to omit the abbreviated title.<ref>{{London Gazette|issue=38487|date=24 December 1948|page=6665}}</ref>


==List of emperors and empresses== ==List of emperors and empresses ==
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
!Portrait !Portrait
Line 61: Line 63:
|1 May 1876 – 22 January 1901 |1 May 1876 – 22 January 1901
|22 January 1901 |22 January 1901
|''None''{{efn|Victoria's husband ] died on 14 December 1861.}} |''None''{{efn|Victoria's husband ] died on 14 December 1861.}}
|]<br>(''represented by ]'') |]<br>(''represented by ]'')
|] |]
|- |-
|] |]
|{{Nowrap|]}} |{{Nowrap|]}}
|9 November 1841 |9 November 1841
Line 85: Line 87:
|Saxe-Coburg and Gotha<br>{{small|(1910–1917)}}<br><hr />]<br>{{small|(1917–1936)}} |Saxe-Coburg and Gotha<br>{{small|(1910–1917)}}<br><hr />]<br>{{small|(1917–1936)}}
|- |-
|] |]
|{{Nowrap|]}} |{{Nowrap|]}}
|23 June 1894 |23 June 1894
Line 91: Line 93:
|28 May 1972 |28 May 1972
|''None'' |''None''
|''None''{{efn|Edward VIII ] after less than one year of reign.}} |''None''{{efn|] after less than one year of reign.}}
|Windsor |Windsor
|- |-
|] |]
|] |]
|14 December 1895 |14 December 1895
Line 106: Line 108:


==See also== ==See also==
*]
*] *]


==Notes== ==Notes==
Line 117: Line 120:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Emperor of India}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Emperor of India}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 07:19, 24 December 2024

Title used by British monarchs from 1876 to 1948 This article is about an official title used by British monarchs. For other emperors in the Indian subcontinent, see List of Indian monarchs. For the British battleship, see HMS Emperor of India.

Not to be confused with Emperor of Hindustan.

Emperor of India
Kaisar-i-Hind
Imperial
The Star of India
Last to reign
George VI
11 December 1936 – 15 August 1947
Details
First monarchVictoria
Last monarchGeorge VI
(continued as monarch of India and Pakistan)
Formation1 May 1876
Abolition22 June 1948

Emperor or Empress of India was a title used by British monarchs from 1 May 1876 (with the Royal Titles Act 1876) to 22 June 1948 to signify their sovereignty over the Indian Empire as its imperial head of state. The image of the emperor or empress appeared on Indian currency, in government buildings, railway stations, courts, on statues etc. Oaths of allegiance were made to the emperor or empress and the lawful successors by the governors-general, princes, governors, commissioners in India in events such as imperial durbars.

The title was abolished on 22 June 1948, with the Indian Independence Act 1947, under which George VI made a royal proclamation that the words "Emperor of India" were to be omitted in styles of address and from customary titles. This was almost a year after he became the titular head of the newly partitioned and independent dominions of India and Pakistan in 1947. These were abolished upon the establishment of the Republic of India in 1950 and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan in 1956.

History

See also: Style of the British sovereign
New Crowns for Old: Disraeli and Victoria in a cartoon mimicking a scene in Aladdin where lamps are exchanged. She made him Earl of Beaconsfield at this time.

After the nominal Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar was deposed at the conclusion of the Indian Rebellion of 1857 (10 May 1857 – 1 November 1858), the government of the United Kingdom decided to transfer control of British India and the princely states from the mercantile East India Company (EIC) to the Crown, thus marking the beginning of the British Raj. The EIC was officially dissolved on 1 June 1874, and the British prime minister, Benjamin Disraeli, decided to offer Queen Victoria the title "Empress of India" shortly afterwards. Victoria accepted this style on 1 May 1876. The first Delhi Durbar (which served as an imperial coronation) was held in her honour eight months later on 1 January 1877.

The Imperial Crown of India

The idea of having Queen Victoria proclaimed empress of India was not particularly new, as Lord Ellenborough had already suggested it in 1843 upon becoming the governor-general of India. By 1874, Major-General Sir Henry Ponsonby, the Queen's private secretary, had ordered English charters to be scrutinised for imperial titles, with Edgar and Stephen mentioned as sound precedents. The Queen, possibly irritated by the sallies of the republicans, the tendency to democracy, and the realisation that her influence was manifestly on the decline, was urging the move. Another factor may have been that the Queen's first child, Victoria, was married to Frederick, the heir apparent to the German Empire. Upon becoming empress, she would outrank her mother. By January 1876, the Queen's insistence was so great that Benjamin Disraeli felt that he could procrastinate no longer. Initially, Victoria had considered the style "Empress of Great Britain, Ireland, and India", but Disraeli had persuaded the Queen to limit the title to India in order to avoid controversy. Hence, the title Kaisar-i-Hind was coined in 1876 by the orientalist G.W. Leitner as the official imperial title for the British monarch in India. The term Kaisar-i-Hind means emperor of India in the vernacular of the Hindi and Urdu languages. The word kaisar, meaning 'emperor', is a derivative of the Roman imperial title caesar (via Persian and Ottoman Turkish – see Kaiser-i-Rum), and is cognate with the German title Kaiser, which was borrowed from the Latin at an earlier date.

Many in the United Kingdom, however, regarded the assumption of the title as an obvious development from the Government of India Act 1858, which resulted in the founding of British India, ruled directly by the Crown. The public were of the opinion that the title of "queen" was no longer adequate for the ceremonial ruler of what was often referred to informally as the "Indian Empire". The new styling underlined the fact that the native states were no longer a mere agglomeration but a collective entity.

George V's signature with the initials R I (Rex Imperator)
A Canadian 1-cent coin with the inscription Ind. Imp. (Indiae Imperator)'

When Edward VII ascended to the throne on 22 January 1901, he continued the imperial tradition laid down by his mother, Queen Victoria, by adopting the title Emperor of India. Three subsequent British monarchs followed in his footsteps, and the title continued to be used after India and Pakistan had become independent on 15 August 1947. It was not until 22 June 1948 that the style was officially abolished during the reign of George VI.

The first emperor to visit India was George V. For his imperial coronation ceremony at the Delhi Durbar, the Imperial Crown of India was created. The Crown weighs 920 g (2.03 lb) and is set with 6,170 diamonds, 9 emeralds, 4 rubies, and 4 sapphires. At the front is a very fine emerald weighing 32 carats (6.4 g). The king wrote in his diary that it was heavy and uncomfortable to wear: "Rather tired after wearing my crown for 3+1⁄2 hours; it hurt my head, as it is pretty heavy."

The title "Emperor of India" did not disappear when British India became the Union of India (1947–1950) and Dominion of Pakistan (1947–1952) after independence in 1947. George VI retained the title until 22 June 1948, the date of a Royal Proclamation made in accordance with Section 7 (2) of the Indian Independence Act 1947, reading: "The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the words Indiae Imperator and the words "Emperor of India" and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm." Thereafter, George VI remained monarch of Pakistan until his death in 1952 and of India until it became the Republic of India in 1950.

British coins, as well as those of the Empire and the Commonwealth, had routinely included the abbreviated title Ind. Imp. Coins in India, on the other hand, had the word empress, and later king-emperor in English. The title appeared on coinage in the United Kingdom throughout 1948, with a further Royal Proclamation made on 22 December under the Coinage Act 1870 to omit the abbreviated title.

List of emperors and empresses

Portrait Name Birth Reign Death Consort Imperial Durbar Royal House
Victoria 24 May 1819 1 May 1876 – 22 January 1901 22 January 1901 None 1 January 1877
(represented by Lord Lytton) 		Hanover
Edward VII 9 November 1841 22 January 1901 – 6 May 1910 6 May 1910

Alexandra of Denmark

1 January 1903
(represented by Lord Curzon) 		Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
George V 3 June 1865 6 May 1910 – 20 January 1936 20 January 1936

Mary of Teck

12 December 1911 Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
(1910–1917)
Windsor
(1917–1936)
Edward VIII 23 June 1894 20 January 1936 – 11 December 1936 28 May 1972 None None Windsor
George VI 14 December 1895 11 December 1936 – 15 August 1947 6 February 1952

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon

None Windsor

See also

Notes

  1. Victoria's husband Prince Albert died on 14 December 1861.
  2. Edward VIII abdicated after less than one year of reign.
  3. A durbar was deemed expensive and impractical due to poverty and demands for independence.

References

  1. "No. 38330". The London Gazette. 22 June 1948. p. 3647. Royal Proclamation of 22 June 1948, made in accordance with the Indian Independence Act 1947, 10 & 11 GEO. 6. CH. 30. ('Section 7: ...(2)The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the words " Indiae Imperator " and the words " Emperor of India " and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm.'). According to this Royal Proclamation, the King retained the style and titles 'George VI by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas King, Defender of the Faith'
  2. ^ Indian Independence Act 1947 (10 & 11 Geo. 6. c. 30)
  3. David Kenneth Fieldhouse (1985). Select Documents on the Constitutional History of the British Empire and Commonwealth: Settler self-government, 1840–1900. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 37. ISBN 978-0-313-27326-1.
  4. Harold E. Raugh (2004). The Victorians at War, 1815–1914: An Encyclopedia of British Military History. ABC-Clio. p. 122. ISBN 9781576079256.
  5. L. A. Knight, "The Royal Titles Act and India", The Historical Journal, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 11, No. 3 (1968), pp. 488–489.
  6. ^ L. A. Knight, p. 489.
  7. "Remembering Vicky, the Queen Britain never had". New Statesman. 10 June 2021.
  8. L. A. Knight, p. 488.
  9. B.S. Cohn, "Representing Authority in Victorian India", in E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger (eds.), The Invention of Tradition (1983), 165–209, esp. 201-2.
  10. See Witzel, Michael, "Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts", p. 29, 12.1 PDF Archived 23 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  11. L. A. Knight, pp. 491, 496
  12. Edward Francis Twining (1960). A History of the Crown Jewels of Europe. B. T. Batsford. p. 169. ASIN B00283LZA6.
  13. Brooman, Josh (1989). The World Since 1900 (3rd ed.). Longman. p. 96. ISBN 0-5820-0989-8.
  14. "No. 38330". The London Gazette. 22 June 1948. p. 3647.
  15. Indian Independence Act 1947, Section 7 (2)
  16. "No. 38487". The London Gazette. 24 December 1948. p. 6665.
  17. Vickers, Hugo (2006), Elizabeth: The Queen Mother, Arrow Books/Random House, p. 175, ISBN 978-0-09-947662-7
Emperors of India
Categories: