Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 13:03, 13 December 2024

Golden Balls
Genre	Game show
Directed by	Julian Smith Kate Douglas-Walker
Presented by	Jasper Carrott
Starring	Amanda Grant
Country of origin	United Kingdom
Original language	English
No. of series	6
No. of episodes	289
Production
Running time	60 minutes (inc. adverts)
Production company	Initial
Original release
Network	ITV
Release	18 June 2007 (2007-06-18) – 18 December 2009 (2009-12-18)

Golden Balls was a British daytime game show that was presented by Jasper Carrott. It was broadcast on the ITV network from 18 June 2007 to 18 December 2009.

Gameplay

Round 1

At the back of the studio is the "Golden Bank," a giant contraption like a lottery machine. Inside are 100 golden balls, containing cash values that range from £10 to £75,000. Twelve of these balls are randomly drawn from the Golden Bank and put into a mixer, and four "Killer" balls are added by Amanda Grant, referred to by Carrott as the "Balls' Assistant" or "Killer Queen." These 16 balls are split equally and randomly among four contestants, each of whom places two balls on their own front and back row holders without looking inside. As Carrott introduces the contestants, they open their front-row balls for all to see.

Following the introductions, the contestants each secretly look at their own back-row balls and announce the contents; they may either tell the truth or lie as they see fit. They then discuss who they think is lying and try to establish who has the worst set of balls, in terms of the lowest total value and/or the most Killer balls. Each contestant secretly casts one vote as to whom they want to remove from the game. The contestant who receives the most votes is eliminated with no winnings. In the event of a two-way tie, the contestants not involved in it must discuss further and try to reach a consensus. If they do, the chosen contestant is eliminated; if not, each tied contestant is given one more ball at random, dispensed from the mixer. One is a Killer, the other is empty, and the person who receives the Killer is out of the game. If every contestant receives one vote, all four continue their discussion; the first three to reach an agreement on who should be eliminated advance to the next round.

All four contestants reveal their back-row balls, and the eliminated contestant must then "bin" their balls, dropping them down a chute and removing them permanently from play.

Round 2

The remaining balls from the three surviving contestants are closed and put into the mixer. Two more cash balls are drawn from the Golden Bank, and one more Killer is added to give a total of 15 balls in play. Each contestant receives five balls, placing two on their front row and three on their back, and play proceeds as in Round 1.

Bin or Win?

The two remaining contestants' balls are again closed and put back into the mixer, and one more Killer ball is added to give a total of 11 balls in play. The balls are mixed and placed on a table, with the contestants seated at opposite ends. Starting with the contestant who brought more money into this round, each first chooses one ball to "bin" (eliminate) and then one to "win" (place in the jackpot). Each ball is opened as it is chosen. If a cash ball is chosen to win, its value is added to the potential jackpot; if a Killer is chosen, the jackpot is immediately divided by 10. Any "win" Killers that are found before the first "win" cash ball do not affect the jackpot. The contestants take turns choosing until they have five "win" balls, after which the one remaining ball is opened and binned.

Depending on the distribution of the balls in the first two rounds, the number of Killers in play at the start of this round can range from one to six.

Split or Steal?

Each contestant is given a set of two balls, one each marked "Split" and "Steal," and must secretly choose one to indicate their intentions after looking inside to confirm which is which. The contestants may speak to each other and ask Carrott for advice before making their decision.

• If both choose Split, they each receive half the jackpot.
• If one chooses Steal and the other chooses Split, the Steal contestant wins the entire jackpot and the Split contestant leaves with nothing.
• If both choose Steal, neither contestant wins any money.

Transmissions

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Scientific research

Golden Balls has attracted attention from social scientists as a natural experiment on cooperation. A team of economists including Richard Thaler have analysed the decisions of the final contestants and found, among other things, the following:

• Individual players on average choose split (to cooperate) 53 percent of the time.
• Contestants' propensity to cooperate is surprisingly high for amounts that would normally be considered consequential but look tiny in their current context, what the authors label a "big peanuts" phenomenon.
• Contestants are less likely to cooperate if their opponent has tried to vote them off the show in the first two rounds of the game, which is in line with the notion that people have an intrinsic preference for reciprocity.
• There is little evidence that contestants' propensity to cooperate depends positively on the likelihood that their opponent will cooperate (i.e., they find little evidence for conditional cooperation).
• Young males are less cooperative than young females, but this gender effect reverses for males 40 years old and above, since men become increasingly more cooperative as their age increases. For males the cooperation is above 30% for age below 30, 50% for 30–40 years old, above 60% for 40–50 and below 80% for age 50 years and above. For females the cooperation rate is below 50% for age below 30, the highest, above 60%, for 30–40 years old, 50% for 40–50 and above 50% for 50 years and above.
• Contestants that promised to split were more likely to split.

Two evolutionary biologists, including Stuart West, have also analysed the correlates of decisions of the final contestants and found similar results. In addition, they also found the following:

• Contestants were less likely to split when their partner had previously lied about the value of their cash balls, but not to hide their killer balls.
• Contestants that initiated laughter were more likely to split.
• In contrast, contestants that initiated physical contact were less likely to split, and being touched was also correlated with being less likely to split.

Another study focuses on whether it is possible to predict the behavior of contestants by carefully analyzing what they say. They find that contestants who make statements that carry an element of conditionality ("I will split if you split") or implicitness ("I want to split", "I came here to split") are less likely to cooperate than contestants who make more explicit promises ("I will split").

Reception

The first show opened with 1.6 million viewers. Viewership climbed to a steady 2 million viewers. In the same 17:00 timeslot, eight of the first eleven episodes beat Channel 4's Richard & Judy, and The Weakest Link on BBC Two also took a dent from the show's success. Series 2 went on to average 2.1 million viewers in early 2008. As of summer 2009, the show's popularity fell; it attracted only around 1.2 million viewers, which led to the show's termination on 18 December 2009. It was originally repeated throughout the week on Challenge in the UK and Republic of Ireland until 2020, although usually during off-peak times. It has also been repeated on ITV again but usually after midnight.

British psychologist Adrian Raine criticised the show, arguing that it "encourages deceitfulness", and that many of its contestants are celebrated for displaying "characteristics of psychopathy". In a review of another ITV quiz show—The Colour of Money—Charlie Brooker criticised Golden Balls' rules, saying that " has more rules and clauses than the European Convention on Human Rights"

Home versions

A video game was released on the Nintendo DS and Wii platforms, and another version for mobile devices was released in November 2008 by Mindscape. In 2008, an interactive DVD game was released by Channel 4. Other versions include an electronic board game in 2007 and a card game in 2008.

International versions

An Argentine version aired on América Televisión in 2008, hosted by Horacio Cabak.

Country	Local name	Host(s)	Network	Year aired
Argentina	Golden Balls	Horacio Cabak	América Televisión	2008

See also

The "Split or Steal?" game element, essentially a variant of the prisoner's dilemma, has been used in other game shows, including:

• Shafted, a previous Endemol production.
• Friend or Foe? an American game show.
• De Verraders, a Dutch game show. During the series finale, if both remaining players chose to steal, the last player eliminated before them won the entire jackpot.
• The Bank Job, a British game show distributed by Endemol Shine Group. In the final episode of each series, if the last two remaining players chose "Trash" (the show's equivalent of Steal), the jackpot was divided among the three players who had been eliminated during that episode.

References

1. ^ ""Golden Balls – UKGameshows". ukgameshows.com.
2. ^ Van den Assem, Van Dolder, and Thaler (January 2012). "Split or Steal? Cooperative behavior when the stakes are large". Management Science. 58 (1): 2–20. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1413. hdl:1765/31292. S2CID 1371739. SSRN 1592456.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
3. ^ Burton-Chellew, Maxwell N.; West, Stuart A. (2 April 2012). "Correlates of Cooperation in a One-Shot High-Stakes Televised Prisoners' Dilemma". PLOS ONE. 7 (4): e33344. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...733344B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033344. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3317651. PMID 22485141.
4. ^ Turmunkh, Uyanga; van den Assem, Martijn J.; van Dolder, Dennie (1 October 2019). "Malleable Lies: Communication and Cooperation in a High Stakes TV Game Show". Management Science. 65 (10): 4795–4812. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3159. hdl:1871.1/e4ed8fb1-220d-464d-bba3-065eaa6363e1. ISSN 0025-1909.
5. Brook, Stephen (3 July 2007). "ITV strikes teatime gold". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
6. Raine, Adrian. "21st Century Television's Faltering Moral Compass". The Economist. 8 April 2009.
7. Brooker, Charlie (21 February 2009). "Charlie Brooker on The Colour of Money". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 7 April 2019.
8. "Golden Balls [Interactive Game] [DVD]". Amazon UK. 17 November 2008. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
9. "Golden Balls Electronic Game". Amazon UK. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
10. "Golden Balls Card Game". Amazon UK. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
11. redactor (27 October 2008). "TV: comienza 'Golden balls', conducido por Horacio Cabak". Periodismo . com (in Spanish). Retrieved 12 March 2019.

External links

• Golden Balls at IMDb.
• Golden Balls Official Endemol UK Site.
• Scientific paper on Golden Balls at SSRN.com.
• Golden Balls at crashthatch.com.
• Golden Balls Mobile Game Official Gameloft UK Site.
• "Golden Balls Game Online" Archived 26 February 2010 at the Wayback Machine – Review of where to play Golden Balls Online.

• 2007 British television series debuts
• 2009 British television series endings
• 2000s British game shows
• British English-language television shows
• ITV game shows
• Television series by Banijay