Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pandigital number: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:57, 12 August 2023 editQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,091 editsm Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:10, 21 July 2024 edit undoSupyovalk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,650 editsm Added Quality - Start 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=start|
{{maths rating}} }}


== Too complicated == == Too complicated ==

Latest revision as of 09:10, 21 July 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMathematics
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Too complicated

This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, Theonlyedge 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter Σ) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. PrimeFan 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! Numerao 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

This is honestly retarded. This is like saying a straight in poker is mathamatically important. AtrusRand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.88.251.198 (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Error in number 987654521, should be 987654321

The number 1234567890 does NOT have all digits in order (unless you mean modulo 10). 84.196.254.9 (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Categories: