Revision as of 16:36, 29 August 2023 editTrue Pagan Warrior (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,682 editsm True Pagan Warrior moved page Talk:Defense-Independent ERA to Talk:Defense-independent ERA: Change to sentence case (MOS:AT): WP:SPORTCAPS← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:34, 31 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,139 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| | ||
{{WikiProject Baseball|importance=Mid}} | |||
}} | |||
This is interesting, but where are the references? -JinAZ | This is interesting, but where are the references? -JinAZ | ||
Latest revision as of 12:34, 31 January 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This is interesting, but where are the references? -JinAZ
Here is one (it was hard to find) WilliamKF 01:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC):
http://www.futilityinfielder.com/dipsexpl.html
The formula comes from Voros McCracken via Jay Jaffe (jay at futilityinfielder dot com).
I think we can give $H exactly rather than estimate it:
- $H = (H - HR) / (BFP - (HR + K + BB + HB)))
WilliamKF 17:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
It seems this formula rewards the pitcher with a lower dERA whenever there is an error by his teammates (i.e. batter gets to first on a fielding error.) Does that make sense, I would think it should be neutral? WilliamKF 15:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- I guess this is right since reaching first on error counts as an out in your batting average, so it should count positively for the pitcher. WilliamKF 00:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
In the text, I've added a link to McCracken's article on dERA, which was also archived by Jay Jaffe: http://www.futilityinfielder.com/dips2.html Mack2 02:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Is line 0 of the equation a typo? BFP, when multiplied by .0074, does not automatically equal the number of intentional walks allowed. In fact, it seems completely counterintuitve. Jorgath 04:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Categories: