| Revision as of 12:14, 9 September 2023 editDaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers24,796 edits →Merge from List of former Emmerdale characters: OopsTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:39, 17 June 2024 edit undoJuniperChill (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,131 edits →"Frank Blackmore (Emmerdale)" listed at Redirects for discussion: add additional nom |
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Television|class=List|importance=High|emmerdale=yes|emmerdale-importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Television|importance=High|emmerdale=yes|emmerdale-importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Soap Operas|class=list}} |
|
{{WikiProject Soap Operas}} |
|
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=List}} |
|
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}} |
|
{{WikiProject Lists |class=List |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Lists |class=List |importance=Low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2022 == |
|
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 17#Frank Blackmore (Emmerdale)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:And also ] at ], but for a different reason. ] (]) 22:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
{{edit semi-protected|List of Emmerdale characters|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Can somebody update Priya Sharma's character duration by ending it with –2022? We now know she is leaving the show and a source has already been added confirming this. ] (]) 16:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}} ] - <small>]</small> 20:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks. Is she definitely leaving in the New Year?] (]) 22:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Hello, ], I believe she is leaving in the new year, as that is what the sources are saying. {{smiley}} ] (]) 08:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::OK. The one I saw said she is due to film her final scenes in a few months time so you are probably right.] (]) 17:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Merge from ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
It's pointless to split lists of characters from a show into current and former. Eventually the show will finish and the merge will be needed. Right now the split doesn't add any value. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 04:10, 9 September 2023 (UTC) PS. See also currently ongoing ] which inspired me to start this merge and identical merge proposals at ], ], ], ] and ]. |
|
|
* '''Oppose''' why is it "pointless", is this is your personal opinion? As a soap editor, it provides readers with a differentiation between current and former characters. Due to the size of the former list, a merge would put ] weight. – ] • 10:58, 9 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
* '''Strong opppose''' – it is not pointless. It is important as it ensures that readers are aware between the difference between current and former characters. This is not a sitcom or drama that has had 20 or less main characters – this is a soap opera with constantly changing characters. I disagree that it means that there is a lot of work for editors – it is not, as we are constantly updating character pages etc and we also move characters when they debut, leave, return, are upgraded to regular or recast. Usually when a character leaves an experienced editor or IP moves the character to the former list the minute the episode airs. Both pages are quite big and merging them would cause the page to be too long and possibly tagged with a *too long* template, let alone it making it even harder to navigate. ] – two pages (one of former and one for present) is not an issue at all and makes it easier to navigate. Also, that policy, along with ], explains how it is important to not make pages too long and too big as it affects download times and creates other issues and suggests that long tables are split off into stand alone pages. The former and present character lists have been used for decades by the soap community through excessive consensus (as I have seen through looking at a lot of the revision history etc from years ago) and this has worked well for years and never caused an issue, so I am surprised that it has been brought up now. ] (]) 12:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
The redirect Frank Blackmore (Emmerdale) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 17 § Frank Blackmore (Emmerdale) until a consensus is reached. JuniperChill (talk) 22:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)