| Revision as of 01:13, 25 March 2007 editScheibenzahl (talk | contribs)699 edits →Re:: re← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:56, 22 December 2024 edit undoDaiopch54 (talk | contribs)5 edits →Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|date=1 April 2023}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| {{Archives|bot=MiszaBot III|age=30|auto=no|large=yes}} | |||
| <span style="font-size:60%">]: 21 Jul 2004 (UTC) – 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) / ]: – 25 Nov 04 / ]: – 19 Dec 04 / ]: – 11 Jan 05 / ]: – 8 Mar 05 / ]: – 6 May 05 / ]: – 1 Jul 05 / ]: – 12 Aug 05 / ]: – 7 Nov 05 / ]: </span><span style="font-size:70%"> – 13 Dec 05 / ]: – 16 Jan 06 ]: – 22 Feb 06 / ]: – 21 March 06 / ]: – 19 May 06 / ]: – 5 Jul 06 / – 9 Aug 06 / <: – 9 Sep 06 / : – 2 Oct 06 / : – 23 Oct 06 / : – 30 Nov 06 / </span><span style="font-size:80%"> : – 17:53, 4 Jan 07 / – 05:16, 16 Feb 07 / : – 08:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| </div> | |||
| |archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| |m | |||
| ==BOT - Regarding your recent protection of ]:== | |||
| axarchivesize = 200K | |||
| You recently protected this page but did not give a protection summary. If this is an actual (not deleted) article, talk, or project page, make sure that it is listed on ]. VoABot will automatically list such protected pages only if there is a summary. Do not remove this notice until a day or so, otherwise it may get reposted. Thanks. ] 09:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |counter = 43 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | |||
| |algo = old(30d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Dbachmann/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
| :] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Fake Royalties Of India in Misplaced Pages == | |||
| As you may remember, there was discussion of moving the page. Although several editors supported the move, there was not that many commentators. So I've listed it as proposed move and in the Village Pump and have opened up an informal poll. I'm not sure if you care either way but as you took part in the earlier discussion, I thought you may be interested in clarifying your views in the new discussion. ] Cheers. ] 16:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/Chamber_of_Princes). | |||
| I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. | |||
| Vinay Jha | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| ==Request for Mediation== | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:80%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| | | |||
| |A ] to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, ]. | |||
| ::::::::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold">^</span>]<sup></span>]]</sup> | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 20:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account operated by the ] to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please ].</center></small> | |||
| |} | |||
| <div align="right">''This message delivered: 20:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)''.</div> | |||
| == |
== Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename == | ||
| The Title and the descriptions are inaccurate , this needs fixing in Wiki and the glottocode as well. ] (]) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I have added a "{{]}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ] 21:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Speed of light article dispute == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| Could you have a look at the ] article and the discussion? An editor in Hungary has decided that a formula is wrong and resents my efforts to clarify matters. He may have been the one who recently blanked the article. At least he has promised to make trouble. | |||
| Thanks. ] 23:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Linkspam through images == | |||
| Check . Clearly the intent is to shill this "Himalayan Academy" outfit. Don't know what to do about this (if anything?) I found it only because the user added a ridiculously sappy image to the ] page. ] 23:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : The plot thickens with {{user|Himalayan Academy Publications}}, who has created the ] page, and linked to it from ]. The idea here clearly is to use Misplaced Pages to publicize this "instant karma" outfit in Hawaii: how do grab you?:-) Perhaps an AfD for the ] page (on grounds of unencyclopedic content and non-notability of subject) would be in order? ] 02:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sorry to overhear your conversation, but I also have noticed this flurry of promotional activity. I just removed the link to the ] page from the ] because it does look to me that this is part of a systematic spam campaign of some sort. The pictures have been showing up on some pages I keep on my watch list, which is how I first noticed this. I do think that the people doing it are probably sincere, however, and so this seems a bit different from the usual crass spamlink. Perhaps they just do not know about the spam guidelines, and some friendly outreach may be in order before lowering the boom. ] 03:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::of course. They are offering their images as it were, and it is up to a case-by-case evaluation if they contribute to the each article. I don't think the images are very enclopedic, but they may have some uses as illustrations in some cases. Nothing terrible is happening. ] <small>]</small> 12:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Lemurian scrolls, huh? Misplaced Pages really never ceases to amaze :) ] <small>]</small> 12:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - ] | <sup>] / ]</sup> 02:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Template:Hypothetical Indo-European subfamilies == | |||
| Hi Dab. You removed the link to ] that I had added in the previous edit. While it may not be an IE subfamily within itself, I concluded that since each subfamily is classified according to whether it falls into or between these two groups, the classification is notable. Based on this, I would like to keep the link within the template. Please tell me what you think. Regards, '''] (]·]·])''' 21:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :it is an isogloss, yes, but from the very beginning it was recognized as ''not phylogenetic'', so that the isogloss has really nothing to do with "hypothetical subfamilies". You could extend the template to include various isoglosses, I suppose, but as it is, the link is really not at home in the template. ] <small>]</small> 21:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I see what you mean. My original point was that it was an isogloss that seperated the subfamilies in question, but you have a point about it not actually fitting in with the subfamilies. OK, we'll keep it out of the template. '''] (]·]·])''' 12:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I've finished working on that article, at least I hope so. I would appreciate you comment, if you have time. -] 22:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| It used to be called "Disputed Indian origins of East Asian martial arts" but Kennethtennyson, for reasons which utterly escape me, moved it to its present title. | |||
| If you want to move ahead with the merger, I suggest you get ] involved. | |||
| Frankly, given my druthers, I would just delete both articles and restore the pertinent sections of "Shaolin Kung Fu" and "Bodhidharma" to and version, respectively. | |||
| Merci vielmals!<br>] 00:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| P.S. There's a book scheduled to come out sometime this year, ''The Shaolin Monastery'' by Meir Shahar. Some of the material in the book has already been published as articles in peer-reviewed academic journals, and once it comes out, it will be the only truly scholarly and comprehensive treatment of the subject. | |||
| We should probably do what we can now, with the caveat that we'll probably have to do much of this work all over again once the book comes out. | |||
| :Freedom skies has used your merge tag on "Bodhidharma..." to accuse me of "ethrocentric Chinese bias". | |||
| :Could I trouble you to clarify the situation at ]? | |||
| :] 11:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Vielen dank. Can you believe that Freedom skies called me "ethrocentric"? That's rot furry. ] 13:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You, sir, are an obvious sock of an undercover Chinese ethlocentrist! And a pathetic one at that, you cannot even spell your ''r'''s properly! ] <small>]</small> 13:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hasn't Bakaman told you? There's no such thing as sockpuppets. ] 13:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::no, BakaSUPRman has kept me out of the loop again :( no such thing as sockpuppets? What then? Only the finest Astroturf, I expect? ] <small>]</small> 13:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Speaking of socks, say hello to . ] 17:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Socks of Maleabroad == | |||
| I don't recall if you have been involved in dealing with the various socks of ] or not. A very active new one as ] is under discussion at ], ], and . We gave tagged he user page as a suspected sock of Maleabroad twice, but he has removed both tags. If you have nothing better to do can you take a look? I include you in the loop only because you may have prior knowledge of Maleabroad's editing patterns. ] 16:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hinduism origin == | |||
| Can you weigh in on ] (and its ]) ? The question is basically, whether "Hinduism originated on the Indian subcontinent" is correct, or whether there is support for saying that it originated in the Arctics. I'll also ask Rudra for his opinion. Thanks. ] 22:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :in the '''arctics'''? I am sorry but this is hardly worth spending time on. Hinduism ''by definition'' originated in India. ] <small>]</small> 07:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I agree with dab here. The (partial) artic origin of Hinduism in my experience is limited to two people, ] and ]. The main page should only deal with mainstream ideas. In this particular instance, both Western academics and Hindu devotees for once agree about something broadly speaking so continuing such a discussion IMO is futile. <b><font color="teal">]</font></b>''<sup><font color="teal">]</font></sup>'' <sup><b><font color="teal">]</font></b></sup> 09:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| well, as Buddhipriya points out on the discussion page, quoting Mallory, the "Arctic" stuff has notability beyond Tilak, | |||
| :"Tilak's 'polar theory' for Aryan origins was not a bizarre quirk of a single individual but rather the culmination of an extremely long tradition of analysis of Indo-Aryan myth ... A modern review of this 'northern cycle' of myths can be found in ] (1980) who argues that Indo-Aryan, Iranian and Scythian traditions (and by cultural contact also Greeks) all shared a common mythology of a northern mountainous land which, he argues, could only have been acquired in their prior common home on the Pontic-Caspian steppe." | |||
| this doesn't change the fact that this is mostly confused nonsense, but it is confused nonsense which can itself be the subject of encyclopedic discussion (], ], etc. etc.) ] <small>]</small> 09:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == request for Arbitration == | |||
| Dab, I have requested arbitration to resolve our dispute ]. Please provide your input in the appropriate section.] 17:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I would encourage you to, even though Sbhushan's arbcom listing appears to mischaracterize certain small details such as previous steps in DR process, the nature of the dispute, etc. | |||
| I think even though one Arbcom member has listed this as a content dispute, it certainly might be viewed as a behavior issue among the other parties - something which might be good to get out of the way. -]] 02:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Women in warfare timelines== | |||
| I noticed that you did some work on the women in warfare timelines. While I'm glad to see that you've taken an interest in the subject, I must object to your expounging of legendary women in war. I have made it very clear on the timelines that the women are legendary and that the dates I placed for them are merely estimates of times that they may have lived. I think that they should be included for the sake of exhaustiveness. Also, the information in the paragraphs that you've added to the top of articles would be better placed into the timeline itself, along with dates accompanying the events you describe, such as the Battle of Bråvalla.I'm not trying to give you hard time, of course, I just wanted to give you some constructive criticism. ] 20:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I know, I'm sorry I made a mess. My main objective was to clean up the ] article. Feel free to deal with the timelines articles as you see fit, I just felt it was necessary that the material I removed from the Amazons articles should show up in the edit history of the "women in warfare" articles. I do think it would be good to have some coherent prose for each period rather than naked timelines, but I'm not going to interfere any further, feel free to either revert or incorporate stuff as you see fit. regards, ] <small>]</small> 22:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I wasn't expecting you to do all that, but I'm genuinely grateful that you did. I have ''never'' seen a sockpuppet smacked down with such undue haste. ] 18:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :I'm getting that unhealthy boost when provoked, I know :o/ ] <small>]</small> 18:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Rig Veda bibliography == | |||
| Thanks for collaborating on the update to the Rig Veda editions. It is likely that some of the source details that I am adding from other places may conflict with details that you are aware of. I am working from printed bibliography sources here, so if you spot cases where you have additional or different information I suggest that you add rather than revert any sourced changed that I make. You may also want to add fact tags to any that you think may be wrong and then we can check them together over the next week. I am noticing some dating issues that may be due to reissues or reprints, for example. It will be nice to get this updated by working together. ] 19:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :yes, I see no problems so far -- I just didn't want to have two sections titled "Translations", listing them once is enough. Keep up the good work, ] <small>]</small> 19:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I had not finished the changes I was making while I had the "Construction" tag on, but I see that you have chosen to work on the issue about editions versus translations before I had finished. That's fine, I will abandon work on the article pending completion of your work. I would prefer that you not remove the references that I am adding, and simply add additional variants, so we can get a variant list established. We can then smooth out any issues with variants as another step. My plan was to finish adding what I had as new material and remove duplicates, which is why I put the Construction tag on. ] 19:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::don't be insulted, I was merely pointing out mistakes you were making. I didn't remove any of your references, but it appeared you didn't understand what you were doing. To begin with, an edition and a translation are two completely different things. Then, Elizarenkova published ''excerpts'' in 1972, and a full translation in portions 1989-99. There is nothing wrong with your references, but you seem to have difficulties recognizing them for what they are. No problem, it's a wiki. ] <small>]</small> 20:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I just wanted to say that there is no doubt in my mind that Tigris is simply Ararat arev's sockpuppet. The behavior matches perfectly. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 01:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The problem is that {{user|Tigris}} is a sleeper sock with its first edits back in April 2006, while {{user|Ararat arev}} only became active in December 2006. ] <small>]</small> 10:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==My revert== | |||
| I'm sorry if your edit was intended to contribute to the page ], but the edit you made does not make sense. You changed: | |||
| "The first artificial limb discovered was found in a tomb in Capua, Italy, dating to ] and was made of copper and wood" | |||
| to read: | |||
| "Mytholgically referred to in the ], the "iron leg" given to ] by the ], the first artificial limb discovered archaeologically was found in a tomb in Capua, Italy, dating to ] and was made of copper and wood." | |||
| Thus, you seem to be claiming that an ancient iron leg referred to in 3000+ year-old ancient Indian texts, was in fact constructed 2300 years ago of copper and wood, and turned up in an Italian tomb. I see no other way to read what you wrote. Since this statement is obviously impossible, not to mention a run-on sentence, I labeled it "incoherent" and noted that it could have been intentionally malicious. If it was not, I apologize. | |||
| ] 02:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no idea how you could get such an impression. I agree the sentence is a bit "run-on", you would be free to silently clarify the obviously intended reading by separating the statement into two sentences. I wouldn't dream of claiming even that there ever was a 3000+ year-old "iron leg", hence the "mythologically". ] <small>]</small> 10:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re:== | |||
| ] consists of an unencyclopaedic term: "pseudoscience". It is neither a branch of study in history, nor anything. If anything, it should be "Hindutva science" or "Hindu science" or something, in that article, under sections "criticisms", or "false claims", or "use by Hindutva proponents" you should discuss what you are planning to. Being something is encyclopaedic, not-being something is not.--] 16:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You will note that we have an entire ], and that our ] gives a reasonable, well-referenced outline of the topic. So, no, you are wrong, sorry. There are citeable academic definitions of what qualifies as pseudoscience. The topic is also discussed on ] itself, with Sokal's paper giving an in-depth analysis of the connections of political radicalism, religious fundamentalism and pseudoscientific babble in Hindu nationalism. ] <small>]</small> 16:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have never heard of ''Hindutva pseudoscience'' before. I don't disagree that some people are using false claims. But I want to draw your attention to the fact that history is not science. It uses many scientific methodologies but it is at the end, speculation, unlike palaeontology, for example. Hindutva pseudoscience as a term does not exist and should not be coined on Misplaced Pages. Please stop pushing for your point of view as if it is academic.{{unsigned|Scheibenzahl}} | |||
| == Retaliatory tactics == | |||
| Hello sir, | |||
| Please avoid retaliatory tactics against me for the AfD nom by tagging my page. Since you are an administrator, there is a clear conflict of interest in falsely accusing me when I point out your biases regarding this matter. I request that you participate in this AfD without attacks, incivility or turning wikipedia into a battleground. ] 21:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have identified you as a sock ], Hkelkar, I just couldn't be bothered to tag your page. It is people with characters like yours that turn wikipedia into a battleground, sadly. Your tactic against my alleged bias would be to cite academic sources to straighten it out, just like I was forced to dig for academic sources. Since you cannot do that, you indulge in trolling and sockpuppeteering. Which really reinforces my position: if there was bona fide material to hold against it, you could just do that instead. ] <small>]</small> 22:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm sorry that you think this way. I do not wish to edit-war or stoop to this level so I won't respond in the way that you do. Your falsely accusing me while I detail your biases is an indication that you are abusing your reputation and powers to silence your detractors. Your post does not change the issue of POV forking off of multiple articles. ] 22:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:56, 22 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Dbachmann has not edited Misplaced Pages since 1 April 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
|
Archives: |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. | |
Fake Royalties Of India in Misplaced Pages
You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/Chamber_of_Princes). I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. Vinay Jha
Nomination for deletion of Template:PIE
Template:PIE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Languages attested from the 12th century BC
A tag has been placed on Category:Languages attested from the 12th century BC indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 20:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Kuki-Chin-Naga Page Needs a rename
The Title and the descriptions are inaccurate , this needs fixing in Wiki and the glottocode as well. Daiopch54 (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: