| Revision as of 23:21, 2 April 2007 editMinderbinder~enwiki (talk | contribs)4,880 edits →Inappropriate advocacy: r← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023 edit undoCycloneYoris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers82,957 edits Notification: listing of Rvvv at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (886 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="500" align="center" | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="left"|] ] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] ] | |||
| == Re: ] == | |||
| |} | |||
| (in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--] (]|]) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Chhh listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Chhh'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == "ESPPP" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| {{Template:ParanormalAnteniSmile}} | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| {{Template:ReallyRational Skepticism-Member}} | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17#Rvvv}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="float: left; clear: left; width:235px; border-right-style:double; border-left-style:double; border-top-style:double; border-bottom-style:double; padding-top:20px; padding-right:20px; padding-left:20px; padding-bottom:20px; border-width:3px;"><font size="3" font color="ff0033" font face="arial">Please put all new content | |||
| <br /> | |||
| at the bottom of the page</font> | |||
| <br /><br /> | |||
| <font size="3" font color="ff0033" font face="">-Thanks </font></div> | |||
| <div style="float: right; clear: right; padding-left:10px; border-width:3px;"><table border='0' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='300'><tr><td> <font size="2" font color="b97600" font face="">You scored as <b>Cultural Creative</b>. Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized religion but still feels as if there is something greater than ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious. Life has a meaning outside of the rational.</font><br><br></td></tr></table><font face='Arial' size='1'></font></table> | |||
| <table border='0' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='300'><tr><td><table border='0' width='300' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0'><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Cultural Creative</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='94' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>94%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Postmodernist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='88' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>88%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Existentialist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='81' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>81%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Idealist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='63' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>63%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Modernist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='63' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>63%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Fundamentalist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='44' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>44%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Materialist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='31' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>31%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Romanticist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='25' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>25%</font></td></tr></td></tr></table><br><br><font face='Arial' size='1'></font></table> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="display:block; position:absolute; left:12px; top:600px;width:235px; border-right-style:double; border-left-style:double; border-top-style:double; border-bottom-style:double; padding-top:20px; padding-right:20px; padding-left:20px; padding-bottom:20px; border-width:3px;"><font size="3" font color="674303" font face="arial"> '''Hi all,'''</font> | |||
| <font font color="674303" font face="arial">I live/work in Monument Valley Utah. It is wilderness, and I have a lot of time to study, especially Parapsychology.</font> | |||
| <font font color="674303" font face="arial">I'd be very happy to hear from you.</font> | |||
| ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 06:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| </font></div> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for your many '''excellent contributions''' to the parapsychology article as well as your many contributions to the area as a whole. - ] 23:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for your many '''outstanding contributions''' to paranormal articles. - ] <small> ] </small> 22:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| ---- | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==Mediumship== | |||
| Didn't John Edward define the various aspects of Mediumship in one of his books? (eg mental mediumship). We could use his book as a source for that, couldn't we? ] <small> ] </small> 23:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Someone on one of the "purported" category discussions pointed out a guideline that said categories couldn't be cited, and therefore couldn't be used in controversial situations. Do you remember seeing that? ] <small> ] </small> 23:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh, yeah! Bios is perfect! Where was that? I'm taking on the issue (against who else?) here: ]. With that cat, and the meaning of 'purported', we're essentially calling everyone a liar who has had that cat applied to them. ] <small> ] </small> 23:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::The wording wasn't as strong as I remembered, but I don't think it justifies calling all the people liars. Or am I overstating the situation? ] <small> ] </small> 23:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If we're going to rename it, I'd suggest ]. Although, I don't really think it's necessary - it is after all a concept that arose from ], what else would it be cornfused with?) ] <small> ] </small> 04:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| These guys are unbelievable. They've latched onto this "vague" thing when it comes to words that I would like to use, but have no trouble wanting to use "purported", which is not only vague, but very damnning in most of it's uses. And self-described isn't vague? It can mean several things too. Unbelievable. ] <small> ] </small> 21:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Then an apparent SPA himself makes this comment: . Take a look at his contributions, I'd say 95% are about the Edward article. ] <small> ] </small> 21:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==BOLD== | |||
| '''BOLDNESS''' is good :-) ] 05:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Mediumship== | |||
| Just to let you know, I didn't say God/good. The highest level of spirit, according to the idea, is a nondual awareness beyond the duality of good and evil. Good and evil are all lower level stuff. | |||
| This isn't about the article. I'm done with it. This is a personal conversation. But read what your guy Butler is saying. He's not talking about good and evil either. He's saying in the example of Hitler, that he was misguided, confused to his true self, spirit. He's saying that just because he died and went to the spirit world that he's not more enlightened. That's not what I was saying either. I'm saying that the spirit world, according to the belief, is a higher vantage point. It can see both the physical and the spiritual world, thus it is more inclusive than the physical world that, without the aid of mediums, can only see the physical. | |||
| See how that is more advanced? It's not about good and evil, it's vantage points. You might want to ask yourself if the concept of good and evil is more your beliefs or that of Spiritualists. I think you'll find that there's concepts of morality there, but not one of evil as evil is usually defined. Instead they'll use terms like misguided, or confused, or less enlightened. Planes of hell aren't places like in the Bible, they're states of division from spirit. | |||
| That's the concept. Read up on it and you'll see that they aren't thinking of evil and negativity like you are. They're thinking in terms of less enlightenment. Enlightenment, of course, being the nondual awareness beyond positive and negative. | |||
| You'll find a lot of references to mediums talking to ghosts that don't know they're dead. That's the ones that aren't anymore enlightened after death. They can't see a spirit world around them. Mediums often try to help them move towards the light, in other words become aware that they are dead. More advanced. | |||
| When looking for spiritual insight, they are looking for the spirits that are aware of their condition and can talk about it. The more advanced ones. | |||
| Get the idea? | |||
| --''']''' <sup>(]|])</sup> 05:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Inappropriate advocacy == | |||
| This constitutes inappropriate advocacy. Please do not do this again. We know that believers in paranormal phenomena consider Misplaced Pages's articles to have a realist bias, this is a natural consequence of our ] policy which demands that we reflect orthodox opinion. The world in general, especially the scientific community, dismisses the majority of paranormal phenomena as either nonsense or explicable by some mundane alternative. Misplaced Pages '''is not the place to fix that''' and inviting people to go to a website which encourages people to try and use Misplaced Pages to fix something that is not Misplaced Pages's problem is not appreciated. Thank you. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Silliness. I put that on her page, because however non-NPOV she may be, she probably needs a bit of compassion. Otherwise, she might feel like she is the only one with problems on Misplaced Pages. I wasn't trying to fix anything, nor, as far as I know, does the website encourage people to fix something (which you would know if you had read it). And if I want to do it again, I will. It is not against the rules. Thank you. ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 03:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::This might clear things up: ]. --] 23:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Ft. Meade building torn down. == | |||
| An episode of the progarm "The Unexplained: Remote Sensing" on the Biography Channel, aired 4/1/2007 12-1pm MDT stated and showed a photograph that the building WAS torn down at Ft. Meade. I did not catch the date of the episode, and the channel guide did not have the next repeat of this story. Further internet searches on the Bio Channel and other sources may find other information. ] 19:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC) LanceBarber 19:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Martin, I was responding to you from your respond to Minderbinder, in Talk:Remote Viewing Page... | |||
| ::This information is cited to a specific source - why has it been repeatedly deleted? --Milo H Minderbinder 21:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::If I recall rightly, the source only said that it was going to be shut down, and it's dated, so we need a source saying it actually was. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 22:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I can only assume that this was your statement as the link led me to you. Just provide addition information to the Talk... If I have misunderstood the converation and links, please remove all of our edits... Sincerely, ] 21:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Psychic== | |||
| Isn't the summary supposed to summarize what's in the article? ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 00:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It could be looked at that way. Another way to look at it is that it outlines the topic and not necessarily the article about the topic. Like if we were to set up sections for psychics on TV, psychics in Pop Culture, psychics in ____, the intro wouldn't have a statement about each of the different sections, just about the topic overall. On this particular article I moved it down to the section itself because that's the part that might be controversial. If someone thought it was, they could tag the section, not the intro. Psychic isn't all about the research, after all, and the first paragraph of the intro already defined the topic. If anything, the second paragraph was defining a tone for the article, one that the article might not end up taking. | |||
| :--''']''' <sup>(]|])</sup> 00:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Martinphi) == | |||
| Hello, ]. Please be aware that a ] has been filed concerning your conduct on Misplaced Pages. The RFC entry can be found by your name in ], and the actual discussion can be found at ], where you may want to participate.<p>Martinphi</p> -- '''<font color="006400">]</font>''' (<font size="1"><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></font>) 01:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:ConductDiscussion --> | |||
| :You should probably wait until the RFC gets approved before preparing your response. Other certifiers are able to add to it. If this happens, what you write may be rendered out-of-date. '''<font color="006400">]</font>''' (<font size="1"><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></font>) 03:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023
File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hampton11235 (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Re: Astral projection
(in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--dchmelik (t|c) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Chhh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chhh. Since you had some involvement with the Chhh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Socratic barnstar.jpg
The file File:Socratic barnstar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
"ESPPP" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ESPPP. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#ESPPP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
"Rvvv" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Rvvv has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17 § Rvvv until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)