| Revision as of 19:01, 6 April 2007 editFolken de Fanel (talk | contribs)6,134 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:50, 19 December 2024 edit undoXoontor (talk | contribs)117 edits {{R with Wikidata item}} |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{self-published|date=April 2007}} |
|
|
A '''Horcrux''' is a ] object in the fictional '']'' series by ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell|1= |
|
The first example of such an object was introduced in the second novel of the series, '']'', although the concept of the Horcrux was only explained in the sixth novel, '']''. Horcruxes are expected to play a large part in the last book, '']''. |
|
|
|
{{R with Wikidata item}} |
|
{{spoiler}} |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
{{R from fictional element|Harry Potter}} |
|
|
{{R from subtopic}} |
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
|
{{R printworthy}} |
|
|
{{R with Wikidata item}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
==Description== |
|
|
|
] |
|
A Horcrux is defined by Rowling as a "receptacle in which a Dark wizard has hidden a fragment of his ] for the purposes of attaining immortality."<ref name="JKL_Diary_092906">Author's website, , ] </ref> With part of a wizard's soul thus stored, the wizard becomes immortal so long as the Horcrux remains intact, typically hidden away in a safe location. If the wizard's body is destroyed, part of the soul remains preserved within the Horcrux.<ref>Rowling, ''Half Blood Prince'' (Scholastic edition), p.503</ref> However, the destruction of the Horcrux creator's body leaves the wizard in a state of half-life, "lesser than the meanest ghost."<ref>Rowling, ''Goblet of Fire'' (British Bloomsbury edition), p.566</ref>. ] was left in this state when his attempted use of a ] on the infant ] backfired upon himself.<ref>Rowling, ''Philosopher's Stone'' (British Bloomsbury edition), pp.14-15</ref> The magic involved in the creation of a horcrux is considered one of the worst of the ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
A Horcrux can be made from any normal object: Lord Voldemort used a diary, a ring, and other objects as Horcruxes. Horcruxes may be concealed for security, but if discovered are vulnerable to destruction, as seen with ] and ]'s ring.<ref>Tom Riddle's Diary is destroyed in ''Chamber of Secrets'' (British Bloomsbury edition), p.237, while the ring is confirmed as destroyed in ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), pp.470-471</ref> Destruction of the Horcrux destroys the fragment of soul contained within it, ending the protection it provides, and rendering the creator mortal if he or she has no remaining Horcruxes. A wizard must have at least one piece of his soul intact on Earth in order to continue living. Thus, if all of the Horcruxes created by one wizard were destroyed, then there would be no way for them to return after being killed, as their death would release the last piece of their soul from mortal existence.<ref name="HBPp503">Half-Blood Prince (US Scholastic Hardback edition), p.503 "That seventh piece of soul will be the last that anybody wishing to kill Voldemort must attack-- the piece that lives in his body."</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
Although ] confirmed that others have created a Horcrux before, Lord Voldemort is the only wizard explicitly mentioned as having created a Horcrux, and is the only wizard known to have created more than one, thus going "further than anybody along the path that leads to immortality."<ref name="HBPp501-2">Half-Blood Prince (US Scholastic Hardback edition), p.501-502</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Creation== |
|
|
Creating a Horcrux requires an act of violence and supreme wrong: the murder of an individual, which is "the supreme act of evil", that "rips the soul apart".<ref>Rowling, ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), p.465</ref> The soul of the creator is split, and a spell is cast to infuse one portion of the soul into the intended object, which becomes a Horcrux. Professor ] tells a young ], "the soul is supposed to remain intact and whole... splitting it is an act against nature".<ref name="HBPp498">Half-Blood Prince (US Scholastic Hardback edition), p.498 ".. the soul is supposed to remain intact and whole. Splitting it is an act of violation, it is against nature."</ref> It is implied that Voldemort became less human with each Horcrux he created, even before the concept was clearly defined; ] commented in the first book that rumours of Voldemort's death were "codswallop" because there wasn't "enough human left in him to die".<ref>Rowling, ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), p.469</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
There is no apparent limitation on the nature of items that can be made into a Horcrux - even living creatures may be used. Lord Voldemort, because of his own arrogance and ], chose objects of significant sentimental or historical value, or as ] put it, objects "worthy of the honour".<ref name="HBPp504">Half-Blood Prince (US Scholastic Hardback edition), p.504 "... these things suggest to me that Voldemort would have chosen his Horcruxes with some care, favoring objects worthy of the honour."</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Horcruxes within the Harry Potter novels== |
|
|
]: one of the known (albeit destroyed) Horcruxes of ], as seen in the film version of '']''.]] |
|
|
]'s creation of Horcruxes is central to the later storyline of the Harry Potter novels. |
|
|
|
|
|
In '']'', Dumbledore states that he believes it is likely that Voldemort created six Horcruxes from six important murders, and kept the remaining portion of his soul within his body, thus keeping his soul in seven separate locations.<ref name="HBPp506">Half-Blood Prince (US Scholastic Hardback edition), p.506</ref> Voldemort chose to do so as seven is a powerful, mystical number (see ]). Thus, anyone wishing to completely kill Voldemort must first locate and destroy all of his Horcruxes, before attempting to eliminate the remainder of his soul that resides in his body. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dumbledore believed that all of Voldemort's Horcruxes are objects that have had some importance or sentimental value to him.<ref name="HBPp504" /> Since he can only create a Horcrux through a deliberate act of murder, knowing the setting and circumstances of Voldemort's murderous acts can yield clues to the possible location and form of his Horcruxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
===Known Horcruxes=== |
|
|
|
|
|
There were two confirmed Horcruxes that were recovered in the first six books of the series, and whose soul fragments were subsequently destroyed: |
|
|
|
|
|
*''']''', previously in ]'s custody, along with other possessions of Riddle's. In '']'', Lucius secretly slipped the diary into ]'s Transfiguration textbook while she was shopping for school supplies at the ] bookstore. She unwittingly took the diary back to Hogwarts, fell under the influence of Riddle's "memories", reopened the ], and released the ]. For a short time, Harry came into possession of the Riddle diary, and thus began a dialogue with Riddle's "memories". Ginny was captured and taken to the Chamber of Secrets, and while attempting a rescue, Harry confronted Riddle and came to realise there was a connection between the diary and the manifestation of Tom Riddle. While Harry did not know the diary was a Horcrux at the time (or even what a Horcrux was), he destroyed it, along with the Riddle memories and soul fragment, using the Basilisk's poisonous fang to stab into the pages of the diary. Harry took the destroyed diary back to ], where he and Dumbledore confronted Lucius Malfoy. Harry returned the diary to Lucius, as part of a ploy to cause Lucius to free his ] ], by stuffing a sock into the diary which Malfoy then inadvertently threw at the elf. The current whereabouts of the destroyed diary Horcrux is not stated, it was last known to be in the possession of Lucius Malfoy. |
|
|
|
|
|
*''']'s ring''', found by Dumbledore hidden in the Gaunt shack, and subsequently destroyed. Events of Riddle's earlier life suggest that he took the heirloom ring when he framed his uncle, ], for the murder of his father. Riddle wore the gold-and-black ring at Hogwarts, and it appears on his hand in ]'s ] memories.<ref>Rowling, ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), pp.335-346</ref>) Dumbledore destroyed the ring Horcrux during the summer, shortly before the start of Harry's sixth year at ].<ref>Rowling, ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), pp.470-471</ref> Dumbledore was seriously injured in the process, with his hand appearing blackened and burned, due to a "terrible curse" placed upon the Horcrux ring. The damaged ring, with its black stone cracked down the middle, was kept for a time on a little table in the ]; Harry later noted that it was no longer there, but received no explanation from Dumbledore. Its current whereabouts are unknown. |
|
|
|
|
|
===Possible remaining Horcruxes=== |
|
|
While the list of items that Lord Voldemort used for his Horcruxes is at present incomplete, Dumbledore made educated guesses about the other four possible Horcruxes. Dumbledore did tell Harry that Voldemort "liked to collect trophies" and would have "preferred objects with a powerful magical history". Dumbledore went on to speculate that Voldemort intended to secure objects previously owned by each of the four ]. {{HP6}} |
|
|
|
|
|
In an interview, author J.K. Rowling indicated that one could correctly identify some of the Horcruxes by carefully rereading the books.<ref> "JKR: Well, I'm prepared to bet you now, that at least before the week is out, at least one of the Horcruxes will have been correctly identified by careful re-readers of the books."</ref> Dumbledore theorised the four remaining and active Horcruxes to be: |
|
|
|
|
|
* ''']'s locket''', believed to have been stolen from ] by ]. It is described as "a heavy golden locket" with "Slytherin's mark ... an ornate, serpentine ''S''."<ref>Rowling, ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), p.409</ref> Dumbledore and Harry, in an attempt to recover a Horcrux, found a locket in a basin on a small island in the middle of a lake, inside a cave along the coast, where Riddle once terrified young children from his orphanage. Harry discovered that the locket was in fact not a Horcrux, but instead contained a note to the Dark Lord, from someone with the initials "]", who stated that he (or she) had stolen the real Horcrux and planned to destroy it. It is unknown if the Horcrux was successfully destroyed. The jacket cover for the UK adult edition of '']'' features a golden locket with a serpentine ''S''. <ref>. Accessed on ]</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
* ''']'s cup''', also believed to have been stolen from Hepzibah Smith by Tom Riddle. It is described as "a small golden cup with two finely wrought handles", with an engraving of "a badger".<ref>Rowling, ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), pp.408-409</ref> The current location of Hufflepuff's cup is unknown. |
|
|
|
|
|
* '''An unknown relic''' belonging to either ] or ]. Dumbledore was unsure whether Voldemort ever managed to find any of Ravenclaw's relics, but he was confident that Gryffindor's only known surviving relics, the Gryffindor Sword (previously mentioned in '']'') and the ], are safe and accounted for in the Headmaster's office. Rowling has also stated on her website that the Sorting Hat is not a Horcrux.<ref>Author's website, .</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
* '''The great ] ]'''. Dumbledore believed the final Horcrux was originally to be made upon the murder of Harry Potter, considering his importance as the "Chosen One" as foretold by ]'s prophecy. Since that attempt failed, Dumbledore believed that the murder of ] in '']'' may have been used to produced the last Horcrux, and that Nagini became the vessel, based on her behaviour and the control Voldemort exerts over her.<ref>Rowling, ''Goblet of Fire'' (British Bloomsbury edition), p.19 - Frank Bryce is murdered. ''Half-Blood Prince'' (US Scholastic Hardback edition), p.506, Dumbledore speculates on the possibility of Nagini as a Horcrux.</ref> Dumbledore also states that Nagini "underlines the Slytherin connection".<ref>Rowling, ''Half-Blood Prince'' (British Bloomsbury edition), p.473</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
No other candidates have been suggested by characters in the books. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Theories and criticisms== |
|
|
In ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'' (editor ]), several potential horcruxes are suggested. These include objects such as the Mirror of Erised (in keeping with a theme of reflection and mirror images in Rowling's work<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?''pp.96-98</ref>), Tom Riddle's award or medal (these bearing his name and testifying to his glory<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'', p.100</ref>), the goblin-made tiara belonging to Molly Weasley's Aunt Muriel (since it would symbolise Voldemort's desire to be a supreme ruler<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'', p.101</ref>), or the cursed opal necklace (opals and ravens have certain features in common<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'', p.68-69</ref>) are all suggested as possibilities for the 'Fifth Horcrux'. |
|
|
|
|
|
The ‘sixth horcrux’ is suggested as being a relic of Gryffindor that was transformed (possibly a wand<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'', p.101</ref>) or Voldemort's own wand (as a symbol of his own power, and—because it contains a phoenix feather—of immortality<ref>, p.102</ref>). |
|
|
|
|
|
A theory that, according to Granger's work, "quite a few (but not all) fans subscribe to" is the theory that Harry's scar is a horcrux, created either accidentally or deliberately.<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'', p.104</ref> This theory is connected to Harry's scar, "a mystery that is central to the series", and which has been described in the novels by Harry as "Voldemort put a bit of himself in ''me''?"<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?', p.109, Rowling, JK, ''Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets'', p.245</ref> The scar and the connection it represents transferred some of Voldemort's powers and nature to Harry, and allows Harry to sense the presence of the soul portion remaining to Voldemort, as well as Voldemort's mood, feelings, and doings; "feelings more than anything are suggestive of a connection between Harry and Voldemort's soul."<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'', p.109-110</ref> This theory has also been tied into questions of whether Harry will survive the final novel (since it is uncertain if a living horcrux can survive being disarmed).<ref>Granger, John, ''Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?'', p.117</ref> However, the prophecy, which states that "neither can live while the other survives" seems to indicate that Harry is not a horcrux. Voldemort needs Harry to live to keep his horcrux, which is the opposite of what the prophecy states, that Harry must die for Voldemort to live and vice versa. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Bibliography == |
|
|
===Books=== |
|
|
*], '']'', "". (). |
|
|
*{{HP1ref}} |
|
|
*{{HP2ref}} |
|
|
*{{HP4ref}} |
|
|
*{{HP6ref}} |
|
|
|
|
|
===Online resources=== |
|
|
*], '']'', "". (). |
|
|
*{{cite web |url=http://www.jkrowling.com |title= J.K. Rowling's Official Site|accessmonthday= October, 9th |accessyear= 2006 |author= ]}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Notes == |
|
|
<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
<references /></div> |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|